uOttawa.cauOttawa.ca
Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings
By Murat Saatcioglu
uOttawa.ca
Basic Principles of Design
𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 ≥ 𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐶𝐶𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷
It is a good practice to reduce seismic demands to the extent possible. This can be done at the conceptual design stage by selecting a suitable structural system
Select a suitable site with favorable soil conditions
Avoid using unnecessary mass
Use a simple structural layout with minimum torsional effects
Avoid strength and stiffness taper along the height
Avoid soft stories
Provide sufficient lateral bracing and drift control by using concrete structural walls
Isolate non-structural elements
uOttawa.ca
Seismic Amplification due to Soft Soil
Soil amplification
Liquefaction
uOttawa.ca
Unnecessary Use of Mass
Heavy Roofing Tiles Carried by URM Walls
Use of Soil for Plantation not Accounted for in design
uOttawa.ca
Unnecessary Use of Mass
Soil on Top of a Structural Slab
uOttawa.ca
Torsional Irregularity
uOttawa.ca
Torsional Irregularity
Increased shear demands on columns away from the shar-wall core
uOttawa.ca
Vertical Irregularity
Central core-wall was removed at the 3rd floor level to accommodate a conference
hall and replaced by columns
uOttawa.ca
Vertical Irregularity (Soft Story)
El Centro County Services Building in California with a soft story. Also lack of column confinement
uOttawa.ca
Drift Control – Bracing by Shear Walls
Non-ductile concrete frames with URM infill
walls (left). Building stiffened by reinforced
concrete shear-walls (right) in the same
block
uOttawa.ca
Interference of Non-Structural Elements
Non-structural elements providing unintentional lateral support
uOttawa.ca
Seismic Design and Detailing Requirements of CSA A23.3-19 and ACI 318-19
Capacity design is employed…..
Selected elements are designed to yield while critical elements remain elastic
Design for
Strength and Deformability
uOttawa.ca
• 𝑓𝑓𝑐𝑐′ ≤ 80 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 for normal-density concrete
• 𝑓𝑓𝑐𝑐′ ≤ 30 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 for structural low-density concrete, unless demonstrated by tests that the strength and toughness is comparable to those elements built with normal-density concrete.
• If 𝑓𝑓𝑦𝑦 > 400 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 the increase in strain demands shall be considered in design and detailing. Higher grades of steel permitted in ACI-318.
• Reinforcement shall comply with CSA G30.18; weldable grade if Rd > 2.5.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Material Strength Limitations
ACI-318 Requirements
uOttawa.ca
Ductile Moment resisting frames (R
d= 4.0) Members Subjected to Predominant Flexure
• Longitudinal Reinforcement
M
rM
rM
r+> 1/2 M
r- -
M
r+> 1/2 M
r- -
Top and Botom 2 bars continuous M
r- > 1/4 M
r-
M
r+> 1/4 M
r-
Top and Bottom: 1.4b
wd / f
y≤ ρ ≤ 0.025
uOttawa.ca
Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R
d= 4.0) Members Subjected to Predominant Flexure
• Transverse Reinforcement
c
1h
ns
1s
2≤ d / 2
50 mm2d
4 / d s
1≤
mm 300
s
1≤
bar . long b
1
8 ( d ) s ≤
hoop b
1
24 ( d ) s ≤
Hoops Sirrups with Hoops
seismic hooks
d
buOttawa.ca
Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R
d= 4.0) Members Subjected to Predominant Flexure
Wf
M-pr M+pr
(Ve)left (Ve)right
Ve = M-pr M+pr ln
ln
Wf ln 2 + +-
Plastic Hinge
• Shear Resistance Requirement
uOttawa.ca
Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R
d= 4.0)
Members Subjected to Combined Flexure and Axial Load
• Longitudinal Reinforcement
Reduced maximum reinforcement ratio to
eliminate congestion of column cage and
concrete placement
uOttawa.ca
• Hoops, seismic crossties or spirals
• Spacing < 6db, 24dt and ½ least dimension of member
Buckling Prevention Ties for Members Subjected to
Combined Flexure and Axial Load
uOttawa.ca
Concrete Confinement in Members Subjected to Combined Flexure and Axial Load
Well confined column
Poorly confined column
uOttawa.ca
CSA A23.3-2019 Confinement Steel Requirements
𝝆𝝆𝒔𝒔
𝒌𝒌𝒑𝒑 = 𝑷𝑷𝒇𝒇 𝑨𝑨𝒈𝒈𝜶𝜶𝟏𝟏𝒇𝒇𝒇𝒄𝒄
uOttawa.ca
𝑘𝑘𝑛𝑛 = 𝐷𝐷𝑙𝑙 (𝐷𝐷𝑙𝑙 − 2)
Where, nlis the number of laterally supported longitudinal bars
𝑘𝑘𝑝𝑝 = 𝑀𝑀𝑓𝑓 𝐴𝐴𝑔𝑔𝛼𝛼1𝑓𝑓𝒇𝑐𝑐
CSA A23.3-2019 Confinement Steel Requirements
uOttawa.ca
CSA A23.3-2019 Confinement Steel Requirements
Spacing of transverse reinforcement for confinement of fully ductile columns:
Spacing of transverse reinforcement for confinement of moderately ductile columns:
uOttawa.ca
ACI 318-19 Confinement Steel Requirements
bc : Core dimension measured to the outside of the perimeter hoop.
Ach : Core area Ag : Gross area
𝐾𝐾𝑓𝑓 = 𝑓𝑓𝑐𝑐′
172 + 0.6 ≥ 1.0 𝐾𝐾𝑛𝑛 = 𝐷𝐷ℓ
𝐷𝐷ℓ − 2
𝐷𝐷ℓ: Number of laterally supported longitudinal bars
uOttawa.ca
ACI 318-19 Confinement Steel Requirements
Maximum spacing requirements for transverse confinement reinforcement:
a) One-fourth of the minimum column dimension
b) For Grade 60 (400 MPa), 6db of the smallest longitudinal c) For Grade 80 (550 MPa), 5dbar b of the smallest longitudinal d) Sbaro as calculated below:
hx is the largest xi (see the figure). It should not
exceed 150 mm and it need not be less than 100 mm
75 mm
uOttawa.ca
Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R
d= 4.0)
Members Subjected to Combined Flexure and Axial Load
Vcol = Macol Mbcol
lu + M-pr
M+pr
lu
M+pr M-pr
Mcola
Mbcol
Vcol Vcol
• Shear Resistance
𝑉𝑉𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑙𝑙 = 𝑀𝑀𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑎 + 𝑀𝑀𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑙𝑙𝑏𝑏 ℓ𝑢𝑢
• The factored shear need not exceed that obtained from structural analysis under factored load combinations with RdRo = 1.3
• The values of θ ≥ 45o and β ≤ 0.10 shall be used in shear design
• The transverse reinforcement shall be hoops or spirals.
uOttawa.ca
Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R
d= 4.0)
Strong Column - Weak beam Concept
M
ancM
bncM
lpbM
rpb∑ M
nc≥ ∑ M
pbuOttawa.ca
• Joint Shear Resistance (Clause 21.3.3.1.2)
A
sA'
sC
1= T
1C
2= T
2T
1= 1. 25 A'
sf
yT
2= 1. 25 A
sf
yx x
V
eV
eV
x-x= V
e- T
2- C
1Joints in Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R
d= 4.0)
uOttawa.ca
• Shear Resistance (Clause 21.3.3.4.1)
j c
c
j
2 . 2 f ' A
V = λ φ
j c
c
j
1 . 6 f ' A
V = λ φ
j c
c
j
1 . 3 f ' A
V = λ φ
Continue half the column transverse reinforcement into the joint
Continue the column transverse reinforcement into the joint
Continue the column transverse reinforcement into the joint
Joint Shear in Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R
d= 4.0)
uOttawa.ca
Joint Shear Failure
uOttawa.ca
The same as those for ductile moment resisting frame elements, except:
• For beams, the clear span of the member shall be not less than three times the beam effective depth.
• For columns, the shortest cross-sectional dimension shall be not less than 250 mm.
Moderately Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R
d= 2.5)
M
rM
rM
r+> 1/3 M
r- -
M
r+> 1/3 M
r- M
r- > 1/5 M
r- -
M
r+> 1/5 M
r-
uOttawa.ca
c1
h
n
s1 s2 ≤ d/ 2 50 mm
2d
4 / d s1 ≤
mm 300
s1 ≤
bar . long b 1 8(d ) s ≤
hoop b
1 24(d ) s ≤
Hoops Sirrups with Hoops seismic hooks
db
Other requirements that are different than those for ductile moment resisting frame elements:
• Probable moment resistance is replaced by nominal moment resistance (for beam, column and joint shear calculations, as well as for checking the strong column-weak beam
requirement).
• Confinement reinforcement spacing is relaxed to h/2.
• Joint shear limits are reduced.
Moderately Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R
d= 2.5)
uOttawa.ca
Flexural Shear walls
t
As
ℓ
h p
h w
ℓw
Concentrated vertical
reinforcement & ties requirements
Design V & M
Minimum wall thickness requirements Concrete and reinforcement requirements
Distributed vertical and horizontal reinforcement requirements
Minimum height of plastic hinge region
hw / ℓw > 2.0
uOttawa.ca
As ≥ 2-15M
≥ 4 bars in 2 layers (plastic hinge)
ρv= 0.0015Ag ρh = 0.002Ag
Rd = 1.5 Rd = 2.0 Rd = 3.5
As ≥ 0.0005bw ℓw
≥ 0.00075bw ℓw (plastic hinge) ρv= 0.0025Ag ρh = 0.0025Ag
As ≥ 0.001bw ℓw
≥ 0.0015bw ℓw (plastic hinge) ρv= 0.0025Ag ρh = 0.0025Ag
hp
hw
ℓw
t t t
As As As
ℓw ℓw
uOttawa.ca