• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings"

Copied!
34
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

uOttawa.cauOttawa.ca

Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings

By Murat Saatcioglu

(2)

uOttawa.ca

Basic Principles of Design

𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 ≥ 𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐶𝐶𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷

It is a good practice to reduce seismic demands to the extent possible. This can be done at the conceptual design stage by selecting a suitable structural system

 Select a suitable site with favorable soil conditions

 Avoid using unnecessary mass

 Use a simple structural layout with minimum torsional effects

 Avoid strength and stiffness taper along the height

 Avoid soft stories

 Provide sufficient lateral bracing and drift control by using concrete structural walls

 Isolate non-structural elements

(3)

uOttawa.ca

Seismic Amplification due to Soft Soil

Soil amplification

Liquefaction

(4)

uOttawa.ca

Unnecessary Use of Mass

Heavy Roofing Tiles Carried by URM Walls

Use of Soil for Plantation not Accounted for in design

(5)

uOttawa.ca

Unnecessary Use of Mass

Soil on Top of a Structural Slab

(6)

uOttawa.ca

Torsional Irregularity

(7)

uOttawa.ca

Torsional Irregularity

Increased shear demands on columns away from the shar-wall core

(8)

uOttawa.ca

Vertical Irregularity

Central core-wall was removed at the 3rd floor level to accommodate a conference

hall and replaced by columns

(9)

uOttawa.ca

Vertical Irregularity (Soft Story)

El Centro County Services Building in California with a soft story. Also lack of column confinement

(10)

uOttawa.ca

Drift Control – Bracing by Shear Walls

Non-ductile concrete frames with URM infill

walls (left). Building stiffened by reinforced

concrete shear-walls (right) in the same

block

(11)

uOttawa.ca

Interference of Non-Structural Elements

Non-structural elements providing unintentional lateral support

(12)

uOttawa.ca

Seismic Design and Detailing Requirements of CSA A23.3-19 and ACI 318-19

Capacity design is employed…..

Selected elements are designed to yield while critical elements remain elastic

Design for

Strength and Deformability

(13)

uOttawa.ca

• 𝑓𝑓𝑐𝑐 ≤ 80 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 for normal-density concrete

• 𝑓𝑓𝑐𝑐 ≤ 30 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 for structural low-density concrete, unless demonstrated by tests that the strength and toughness is comparable to those elements built with normal-density concrete.

• If 𝑓𝑓𝑦𝑦 > 400 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 the increase in strain demands shall be considered in design and detailing. Higher grades of steel permitted in ACI-318.

• Reinforcement shall comply with CSA G30.18; weldable grade if Rd > 2.5.

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Material Strength Limitations

ACI-318 Requirements

(14)

uOttawa.ca

Ductile Moment resisting frames (R

d

= 4.0) Members Subjected to Predominant Flexure

• Longitudinal Reinforcement

M

r

M

r

M

r+

> 1/2 M

r

- -

M

r+

> 1/2 M

r

- -

Top and Botom 2 bars continuous M

r

- > 1/4 M

r

-

M

r+

> 1/4 M

r

-

Top and Bottom: 1.4b

w

d / f

y

≤ ρ ≤ 0.025

(15)

uOttawa.ca

Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R

d

= 4.0) Members Subjected to Predominant Flexure

• Transverse Reinforcement

c

1

h

n

s

1

s

2

≤ d / 2

50 mm

2d

4 / d s

1

mm 300

s

1

bar . long b

1

8 ( d ) s ≤

hoop b

1

24 ( d ) s ≤

Hoops Sirrups with Hoops

seismic hooks

d

b
(16)

uOttawa.ca

Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R

d

= 4.0) Members Subjected to Predominant Flexure

Wf

M-pr M+pr

(Ve)left (Ve)right

Ve = M-pr M+pr ln

ln

Wf ln 2 + +-

Plastic Hinge

• Shear Resistance Requirement

(17)

uOttawa.ca

Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R

d

= 4.0)

Members Subjected to Combined Flexure and Axial Load

• Longitudinal Reinforcement

Reduced maximum reinforcement ratio to

eliminate congestion of column cage and

concrete placement

(18)

uOttawa.ca

• Hoops, seismic crossties or spirals

• Spacing < 6db, 24dt and ½ least dimension of member

Buckling Prevention Ties for Members Subjected to

Combined Flexure and Axial Load

(19)

uOttawa.ca

Concrete Confinement in Members Subjected to Combined Flexure and Axial Load

Well confined column

Poorly confined column

(20)

uOttawa.ca

CSA A23.3-2019 Confinement Steel Requirements

𝝆𝝆𝒔𝒔

𝒌𝒌𝒑𝒑 = 𝑷𝑷𝒇𝒇 𝑨𝑨𝒈𝒈𝜶𝜶𝟏𝟏𝒇𝒇𝒇𝒄𝒄

(21)

uOttawa.ca

𝑘𝑘𝑛𝑛 = 𝐷𝐷𝑙𝑙 (𝐷𝐷𝑙𝑙 2)

Where, nlis the number of laterally supported longitudinal bars

𝑘𝑘𝑝𝑝 = 𝑀𝑀𝑓𝑓 𝐴𝐴𝑔𝑔𝛼𝛼1𝑓𝑓𝒇𝑐𝑐

CSA A23.3-2019 Confinement Steel Requirements

(22)

uOttawa.ca

CSA A23.3-2019 Confinement Steel Requirements

Spacing of transverse reinforcement for confinement of fully ductile columns:

Spacing of transverse reinforcement for confinement of moderately ductile columns:

(23)

uOttawa.ca

ACI 318-19 Confinement Steel Requirements

bc : Core dimension measured to the outside of the perimeter hoop.

Ach : Core area Ag : Gross area

𝐾𝐾𝑓𝑓 = 𝑓𝑓𝑐𝑐

172 + 0.6 ≥ 1.0 𝐾𝐾𝑛𝑛 = 𝐷𝐷

𝐷𝐷 − 2

𝐷𝐷: Number of laterally supported longitudinal bars

(24)

uOttawa.ca

ACI 318-19 Confinement Steel Requirements

Maximum spacing requirements for transverse confinement reinforcement:

a) One-fourth of the minimum column dimension

b) For Grade 60 (400 MPa), 6db of the smallest longitudinal c) For Grade 80 (550 MPa), 5dbar b of the smallest longitudinal d) Sbaro as calculated below:

hx is the largest xi (see the figure). It should not

exceed 150 mm and it need not be less than 100 mm

75 mm

(25)

uOttawa.ca

Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R

d

= 4.0)

Members Subjected to Combined Flexure and Axial Load

Vcol = Macol Mbcol

lu + M-pr

M+pr

lu

M+pr M-pr

Mcola

Mbcol

Vcol Vcol

• Shear Resistance

𝑉𝑉𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑙𝑙 = 𝑀𝑀𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑎 + 𝑀𝑀𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑙𝑙𝑏𝑏𝑢𝑢

• The factored shear need not exceed that obtained from structural analysis under factored load combinations with RdRo = 1.3

• The values of θ ≥ 45o and β ≤ 0.10 shall be used in shear design

• The transverse reinforcement shall be hoops or spirals.

(26)

uOttawa.ca

Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R

d

= 4.0)

Strong Column - Weak beam Concept

M

anc

M

bnc

M

lpb

M

rpb

∑ M

nc

≥ ∑ M

pb
(27)

uOttawa.ca

• Joint Shear Resistance (Clause 21.3.3.1.2)

A

s

A'

s

C

1

= T

1

C

2

= T

2

T

1

= 1. 25 A'

s

f

y

T

2

= 1. 25 A

s

f

y

x x

V

e

V

e

V

x-x

= V

e

- T

2

- C

1

Joints in Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R

d

= 4.0)

(28)

uOttawa.ca

• Shear Resistance (Clause 21.3.3.4.1)

j c

c

j

2 . 2 f ' A

V = λ φ

j c

c

j

1 . 6 f ' A

V = λ φ

j c

c

j

1 . 3 f ' A

V = λ φ

Continue half the column transverse reinforcement into the joint

Continue the column transverse reinforcement into the joint

Continue the column transverse reinforcement into the joint

Joint Shear in Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R

d

= 4.0)

(29)

uOttawa.ca

Joint Shear Failure

(30)

uOttawa.ca

The same as those for ductile moment resisting frame elements, except:

• For beams, the clear span of the member shall be not less than three times the beam effective depth.

• For columns, the shortest cross-sectional dimension shall be not less than 250 mm.

Moderately Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R

d

= 2.5)

M

r

M

r

M

r+

> 1/3 M

r

- -

M

r+

> 1/3 M

r

- M

r

- > 1/5 M

r

- -

M

r+

> 1/5 M

r

-

(31)

uOttawa.ca

c1

h

n

s1 s2d/ 2 50 mm

2d

4 / d s1

mm 300

s1

bar . long b 1 8(d ) s

hoop b

1 24(d ) s

Hoops Sirrups with Hoops seismic hooks

db

Other requirements that are different than those for ductile moment resisting frame elements:

• Probable moment resistance is replaced by nominal moment resistance (for beam, column and joint shear calculations, as well as for checking the strong column-weak beam

requirement).

• Confinement reinforcement spacing is relaxed to h/2.

• Joint shear limits are reduced.

Moderately Ductile Moment Resisting Frames (R

d

= 2.5)

(32)

uOttawa.ca

Flexural Shear walls

t

As

h p

h w

w

Concentrated vertical

reinforcement & ties requirements

Design V & M

Minimum wall thickness requirements Concrete and reinforcement requirements

Distributed vertical and horizontal reinforcement requirements

Minimum height of plastic hinge region

hw / w > 2.0

(33)

uOttawa.ca

As ≥ 2-15M

≥ 4 bars in 2 layers (plastic hinge)

ρv= 0.0015Ag ρh = 0.002Ag

Rd = 1.5 Rd = 2.0 Rd = 3.5

As ≥ 0.0005bw w

≥ 0.00075bw w (plastic hinge) ρv= 0.0025Ag ρh = 0.0025Ag

As ≥ 0.001bw w

≥ 0.0015bw w (plastic hinge) ρv= 0.0025Ag ρh = 0.0025Ag

hp

hw

w

t t t

As As As

w w

(34)

uOttawa.ca

Questions and Comments…

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

1) The structure of the planned building is a six floor and one basement with the Intermediate reinforced concrete moment frames in Surakarta. 2) Quake load analysis

BASE PLATES (Cont’d)..  Moment and axial force replaced by equivalent axial force at a distance e from center of column.  Small eccentricities  equivalent axial force

There is still a possible remaining capacity gain in axial load and bending moment of confined concrete column compared to that of the unconfined one, particularly in

6.11 Comparison of acceleration responses at base level, first floor and roof level subjected to four earthquakes full intensity applied along X-axis Peak acceleration and displacement

Thesis Title : SEISMIC FRAGILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS WITH MASONRY INFILLS Name of Thesis Supervisors : Hemant B Kaushik Thesis Submitted to the Department/ Center :

For beam-column joints with principal tension stress p1 > -0.29/JZ and principal compression stress Pc < 0.5f/ or 0.45f: for biaxial bending, failure may be due to joint shear, bond

International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial and Energy Engineering 2014 26-27 December, 2014, Khulna, BANGLADESH ICMIEE-PI-1403350 Seismic Fragility Evaluation of a Moment

For the tanks studied in this paper, when a tank is empty, flexure strength governs the failure mode for all aspect ratios ratio of height to diameter of the support shaft and time