The number shown in 2 (a) as a percentage of the number who started the program in that student intake.). At the end of the first year of the program, 9 of these students have withdrawn.
Delivery of Planned Courses
Compensating action if required
Summary Program Evaluation 1. Alumni Evaluations (1439/1440)
- Graduating Students Evaluations (Exit Survey)
- Rating on Sub-Standards 4 by program faculty and teaching staff 4.1 to 4.10
The results of the survey show that 66.06% of the alumni are satisfied with the survey aspect "The level of program preparation for you in the following Program learning outcomes". The level of program preparation for our graduates in the following Program Learning Outcomes 1- Demonstrate their knowledge and skills related to electrical engineering issues through appropriate.
Sub-Standards
In addition, the results and analysis of employers will be discussed at the fourth meeting of the College Advisory Committee. For each course, indicate whether student evaluations and/or other evaluations of teaching quality have been conducted.
NONE
MATHE
List courses taught by this program this year and for this program that are in other programs
- Cognitive Skills
- Communication, Information Technology, Numerical 4.1 Demonstrate the ability to
The actual achievement of this program's learning outcome is 67%, which is marginally below the benchmark (70%), an increase of 5% over the performance in the same KPI last year. The actual achievement of this program's learning outcome is 68%, which is marginally below the benchmark (70%), the increase is 6% compared to the performance in the same KPI last year.
Professional Development Activities for Faculty, Teaching and Other Staff
The induction week is intended to acquaint new faculty members with university regulations and rules. Independent opinion on the quality of the program (eg head of another similar department / .. program offering commentary on evidence received and conclusions reached).
Matters Raised by Evaluator Giving
Some learning areas involving complex numbers and programming should be emphasized in some courses. The texts in the course files must be updated (the latest version no more than 5 years old).
Implications for Planning for the Program
Average rating on the adequacy of academic and career counseling on a five-point scale in an annual survey of the last year. Stakeholder evaluation of IT services (Average overall suitability rating on a five-point scale of an annual survey).
Action Plan Progress Report
- Progress on Implementation of Previous Year’s Action Plans
APPENDIX-1
College of Engineering
Department of Electrical Engineering Result Analysis
The average marks
Maximum marks
Passing rate
Applied Mathematics for Engineers Electrical Energy Utilization Power System Operation & Control Power System Planning Industrial Power System Design High Voltage Engineering Protection of the Chosen. Communication systems Fiber optics communication Mobile communication Power Electronics Electrical Power Lab Fundamentals of Control Systems Control Systems Lab Control Systems Lab Management of Engineering Projects Microwave Electronics Electric Machines (2) 24 Electric Machines Lab. Power System Protection Lab Mobile Communications Power Electronics Electrical Energy Utilization Power System Operation & Control Power System Planning Industrial Power System Design Engineering Project Management Microwave Electronics Integrated VLSI Circuit Design Integrated VLSI Circuit Lab.
Signals and System Analysis Probability Methods in Electrical Engineering Introduction to Microprocessors Microprocessor Laboratory Microprocessor Laboratory Electrical Circuits Analysis Electromagnetic.
COURSES WITH LOW PASSING RATES SPRING-2019
COURSES WITH LOW PASSING RATES FALL-2018
Control Systems Laboratory Microwave Electronics Electric Power Laboratory Fundamentals of Control Systems Wave Propagation and Antennas 13 Electric Machines Laboratory. 1 Logic Design Lab for EE Students Logic Design Lab for EE Students Fundamentals of Network Engineering. Introduction to Microprocessors Microprocessor Lab Electromagnetic Control Systems Lab VLSI Integrated Circuit Design VLSI Integrated Circuit Lab.
Electronics Lab (2) Principles of Communications Microprocessor Lab Electronics (1) Electrical Circuits Lab Electrical Circuits Lab Electrical Measurements Lab Logic Design Lab for EE Students Logic Design Lab for EE Students Fundamentals of Engineering Network Logic Design for EE Students. Fundamentals of Network Engineering Logic Design for EE Students 2 Logic Design Lab for EE Students.
APPENDIX-2
This analysis has been prepared on the basis of a survey designed specifically to analyze the feedback from the Alumni in Electrical Engineering program for the academic year 1439/1440. Ø The second aspect: the level of program preparation for you in the following program learning outcomes. Ø The third aspect: The importance of these learning outcomes for your work experience.
The total number of alumni in the program who responded to this survey (sample size) was 33. Results on your work experience 10 0.860 Where the scale shows the truth and stability of all aspects of the survey.
Alumni Employment Record
First Aspect: Qualities and Abilities
Second Aspect: The level of program preparation for you in the following Program Learning Outcomes
The results summarized in the table above show that 66.06% of the graduates are half satisfied with the second aspect of the survey "The level of preparation of the program for you in the following program learning outcomes".
Third aspect: The level of importance of these Learning Outcomes to your employment experience
The results summarized in the table above show that 73.94% of the alumni are satisfied with the third aspect of the survey. The alumni's ability to perform task effectively in multidisciplinary teams are averaged with a grade of 66.67.
Proposed plans for improvement
The second aspect: The level of preparation of the program for you in the following program learning outcomes 1. Increase the student's interests in graduation projects to focus on creating electrical engineering designs taking into account public health, safety and welfare , as well as global, cultural, social, environmental and economic factors. Raising the awareness of students to recognize the ethical and professional responsibilities of electrical engineers during their studies and oriented seminars.
Demonstrate the ability to work effectively in interdisciplinary teams whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, set goals, plan tasks and meet objectives. Raise students' awareness of the importance of working effectively in team groups through labs and workshops.
APPENDIX-3
This analysis was prepared on the basis of a study specifically designed to analyze the feedback from the Employers in Electrical Engineering program for the academic year 1439/1440. Ø The second aspect: the level of program preparation for our graduates in the following learning outcomes. Ø The third aspect: the importance of these learning outcomes for our graduate work experience.
In addition, the mean and rotation are calculated for each position and for all three aspects. Where the scale shows the truth and stability of all aspects of the investigation.
First Aspect: Qualities and Abilities
Second Aspect: The level of program preparation for our graduates in the following Learning Outcomes
The results summarized in the above table show that 83% of employers are satisfied with the second aspect of the survey. While employers rated statements in the survey related to solving complex technical problems, creating electrical engineering designs, project management techniques and professional responsibilities as average. Third aspect: The degree of importance of these learning outcomes for our master's education experience.
Third Aspect: The level of importance of these learning outcomes to our graduate employment experience
Analyze, formulate and solve complex electrical engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science and mathematics. Create electrical engineering design to produce solutions that meet specific needs taking into account public health, safety and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental and economic factors. Demonstrate the ability to recognize the ethical and professional responsibilities of electrical engineers and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact.
Demonstrate the ability to recognize the ethical and professional responsibilities of electrical engineers and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental and societal contexts. Raising the awareness of students to recognize the ethical and professional responsibilities of electrical engineering is during their studies and oriented seminars.
APPENDIX-4
This analysis was prepared on the basis of a survey specially designed to analyze the opinions of students in the Department of Electrical Engineering for their evaluation. Ø First aspect: help and support provided for my education Ø Second aspect: resources for educational support. Additionally, the mean and rotation are calculated for each statement and all four aspects.
With the scale showing the veracity and stability of all aspects of the survey.
First aspect: the assistance and support provided to my education
Second aspect: Resources for educational support
Third aspect: Evaluation of the education that I got
Fourth aspect: Overall Evaluation
APPENDIX-5
اﳌﻤﻠ
وزا
ﺟ8ﺎﻣ8
ﺔ اﳉ
ﯿﺔ ﳇﻬﻨ اﻟ
ﻗﺴ
Communications and Electronics Track Matrix Fall-2018
Fiber Optic Communication Mobile Communication Wave Propagation and Antennas Logic Design for EE Students Logic Design Lab for EE Students Fundamentals of network Engineering.
Communications and Electronics Track Matrix Spring-2019
Logic Design for EE Students Logic Design Lab for EE Students Fundamentals of Network Engineering.
Communications and Electronics Track Direct Assessment Comparison
PLO 6
PLO 8
Max Target Actual PLOs
Fall-2018 Actual PLOs Spring-2019
Communications and Electronics Track Indirect Assessment Comparison
Exit Survey Comparison
Alumni Survey
Max Target Alumni Survey Spring-2019
Employer Survey
Max Target Employer Survey Spring-2019
COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-1
Course Marks Course Evaluation
Survey Exit Survey Alumni Survey Employer Survey
Program Learning Outcome-1
COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-2
Program Learning Outcome-2
COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-3
Program Learning Outcome-3
COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-4
Program Learning Outcome-4
COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-5
Program Learning Outcome-5
COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-6
Program Learning Outcome-6
COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-7
Program Learning Outcome-7
COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-8
Program Learning Outcome-8
COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-9
Program Learning Outcome-9
COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONICS TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-10
Program Learning Outcome-10
Assessment Year: 1439-40 Program Learning Outcome: Demonstrate their knowledge and skills related to electrical engineering issues using appropriate learning strategies. Assessment year: 1439-40 Program Learning Outcome: Describes knowledge of concepts, principles, theories and procedures in electrical engineering. Assessment Year: 1439-40 Program Learning Outcome: Analyse, formulate and solve complex electrical engineering problems by applying the principles of engineering, science and mathematics.
Assessment Year: 1439-40 Program Learning Outcomes: Demonstrate the ability to carry out appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions. Assessment Year: 1439-40 Program Learning Outcome: Demonstrates the ability to communicate effectively with a variety of audiences.
ELECTRICAL POWER TRACK FALL-2018
ELECTRICAL POWER TRACK MAPPING SPRING-2019
Electrical Power Track
Direct Assessment Comparison
Indirect Assessment Comparison
ELECTRICAL POWER TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-1
ELECTRICAL POWER TRACK
ELECTRICAL POWER TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-3
ELECTRICAL POWER TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-4
ELECTRICAL POWER TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-5
ELECTRICAL POWER TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-6
ELECTRICAL POWER TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-7
ELECTRICAL POWER TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-8
ELECTRICAL POWER TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-9
ELECTRICAL POWER TRACK PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOME-10
The actual achievement of this program's learning outcomes is 70%, which is equal to the benchmark (70%). The actual achievement of this program's learning outcomes is 69%, which is slightly below the benchmark (70%). Assessment year: 1439-40 Program learning outcomes: Demonstrate the ability to carry out work effectively in interdisciplinary teams whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, set goals, plan tasks and meet objectives.
Year of Assessment: 1439-40 Program Learning Outcome: Demonstrate the ability to recognize the ethical and professional responsibilities of electrical engineers and make informed judgments that must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental and social. In order to further improve the learning outcome performance indicator of this program in terms of subjects, it is recommended that in the courses dealing with this indicator, group discussion takes place in class.
APPENDIX-6
Electrical Engineering Program
Executive Summary
KPIs addressed
Management of Program Quality Assurance 3
Standard 5: Student Administration and Support
Financial Planning and Management 1 Standard 9: Faculty and Staff Employment Processes 2
Standard 11: Institutional Relationships with the
- Why this internal benchmark provider was chosen?
- How was the benchmark calculated?
- Name of the internal benchmark provider
- Why this external benchmark provider was chosen?
- Name of the external benchmark provider
The internal benchmark is based on a survey conducted among EE staff during the year and is the average of the scores on the issues relevant to this KPI. The internal benchmark is based on surveys conducted among EE students and staff during the year and is the average of the results in these two surveys. The internal benchmark is based on surveys conducted among EE students and staff during the year and is the average of the scores for the "Information Technology" aspect of these two surveys.
To obtain the actual benchmark, the response scores for the relevant aspects of the two studies were averaged. The internal benchmark is based on surveys conducted among EE students and staff throughout the year and is an average of the scores on the relevant aspects of the two surveys.