• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Biodiversity and Health in the Face of Climate Change

N/A
N/A
Nguyễn Gia Hào

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Biodiversity and Health in the Face of Climate Change"

Copied!
494
0
0

Teks penuh

This volume contributes significantly to the knowledge base to show the interlinkages between biodiversity and health in a changing climate. This book would not have been possible without the collective expertise and understanding of the various interrelated issues of biodiversity and health in the face of climate change.

Editors

Aletta Bonn, Professor of Ecosystem Services at the Friedrich Schiller University Jena in Germany and head of the Ecosystem Services Department at the Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research Germany (UFZ) and the German Center for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv). With a working background at the interface between science and policy in the UK and Germany, her research focuses on ecosystem services, biodiversity and human well-being, participatory conservation and citizen science.

Contributors

Raymond De Young Associate Professor of Environmental Psychology and Planning at the University of Michigan, USA. Matthew Dennis Lecturer in Geographical Information Science in Geography at the University of Manchester, UK.

Biodiversity and Health in the Face of Climate Change: Challenges,

Background

The work with NBS shows the importance of green areas for adaptation and mitigation of climate change (Kabisch et al. 2017). Biodiversity supports ecosystem services essential to human health and well-being (Cardinale et al. 2012).

Scope of the Book

Specifically, this book identifies not only the contribution of biodiversity to physical health, but also to mental and spiritual health and well-being in the face of climate change. The scope of this book is the contribution of biodiversity to physical, mental and spiritual health and well-being in the face of climate change.

Structure and Contents of the Book

  • Part I: Biodiversity and Physical Health
  • Part II: Biodiversity, Mental Health and Spiritual Well-Being
  • Part III: Implications of the Biodiversity and Health Relationship
  • Part IV: Planning and Managing Urban Green Spaces for Biodiversity and Health in a Changing Climate

The final chapters review the evidence on the impact of biodiversity on mental health and spiritual well-being. Complementing this chapter, Ruth Hunter and co-authors discuss the effectiveness of urban green space interventions for improving health and biodiversity and make recommendations for research, policy, and practice.

Lovell R, Wheeler BW, Higgins SL, Irvine KN, Depledge MH (2014) A systematic review of the health and well-being benefits of biodiverse environments. Watts N, Adger WN, Agnolucci P et al (2015) Health and climate change: policy responses to protect public health.

Biodiversity and Physical Health

Biodiversity, Physical Health and Climate Change: A Synthesis of Recent Evidence

Introduction

Biodiversity is considered one of the underlying requirements for the beneficial functioning of ecosystems for human health and well-being and as such is entrenched in policy-oriented arenas (Lovell et al. 2014; Sandifer et al. 2015). Third, we provide an overview of some of the important ways in which climate change affects physical health and the natural environment, including through biodiversity (see section 2.4).

Fig. 2.1  Determinants of human health and well-being (Barton and Grant 2006, based on Dahlgren  and Whitehead 1991), including biodiversity at the human scale (after Garrett 2015, Ruokolainen  et al
Fig. 2.1 Determinants of human health and well-being (Barton and Grant 2006, based on Dahlgren and Whitehead 1991), including biodiversity at the human scale (after Garrett 2015, Ruokolainen et al

Nature’s Contributions to Physical Health

Some of the published evidence relates to effects seen as a result of simply being in 'natural' spaces (Haluza et al. 2014). Brassica vegetables are associated with anti-cancer properties as well as a number of other health benefits (Moreno et al. 2006).

Fig. 2.2  Pathways for physiological outcomes associated with ‘exposure to natural environments’
Fig. 2.2 Pathways for physiological outcomes associated with ‘exposure to natural environments’

Biodiversity and Physical Health

In turn, biodiversity ultimately affects human health by making agricultural systems inherently more resilient and less vulnerable to large-scale losses (Dobson et al. 2006). Evidence also suggests a link between biodiversity and the productivity of systems for human use, for example, more biodiverse forests and fisheries are more productive for fuel and food (Harrison et al. 2014).

Fig. 2.3  The inter-relationships between human and ecological health as expressed through the  exposome concept (top) and the pathways to reductions in physical health through dysbiosis  (bot-tom) (Renz et al
Fig. 2.3 The inter-relationships between human and ecological health as expressed through the exposome concept (top) and the pathways to reductions in physical health through dysbiosis (bot-tom) (Renz et al

Climate Change and Physical Health

Although changes in influenza peaks and seasons have been observed, climatic and other determinants are currently uncertain (Caini et al. 2018). The stagnation events associated with air quality episodes may also be associated with summer heat waves and thus have cumulative outcomes for human health (Doherty et al. 2017).

Fig. 2.5  Pathways through which climate change can influence human health and well-being,  including though ecosystem-related effects
Fig. 2.5 Pathways through which climate change can influence human health and well-being, including though ecosystem-related effects

Exploring a Subset of Interactions Through an Urban Case Study

The neighborhood could also see an increase of up to 3.4 °C (2.4 °C) in the temperature of the hottest summer day (night), according to the central estimate of the UKCIP09 projections (high emissions scenario) with these highest increases expected for the upland Pennine fringe (Cavan 2010). At least one industrial fire occurred in Rochdale to the north-east of the borough.

Fig. 2.6  Peak daily concentrations of air pollutants monitored for human health (top) and maxima  and minima air temperatures  (bottom)
Fig. 2.6 Peak daily concentrations of air pollutants monitored for human health (top) and maxima and minima air temperatures  (bottom)

Conclusion

Uncertainties remain about some of the evidence for links between biodiversity, human physical health and climate change. Lovell R, Wheeler BW, Higgins SL, Irvine KN, Depledge MH (2014) A systematic review of health and well-being.

Climate Change and Pollen Allergies

  • Introduction
  • Clinical Implications of Pollen-induced Respiratory Allergy
  • Allergenic Pollen and Epidemiology
  • Adjuvant Factors from Pollen and Impact of Environmental Factors
  • New Pollen Allergies: The Case of Ragweed
  • Climate Change Effects
  • Pollen Information Services
  • Conclusions and Future Challenges

Gilles S, Fekete A, Zhang X et al (2011) Pollen metabolome analysis reveals adenosine as a key regulator of dendritic cell-prone T(H) cell responses. Troise C, Voltolini S, Delbono G et al (1992) Allergy to pollens from Betulaceae and Corylaceae in a Mediterranean area (Genoa, Italy).

Table 3.1  Epidemiological studies on the allergenic properties of airborne pollen from different  plant taxa
Table 3.1 Epidemiological studies on the allergenic properties of airborne pollen from different plant taxa

Vector-Borne Diseases

Triple Vulnerability: Climate Change, Biodiversity and Vector-Borne Diseases

Climate and biodiversity change has health impacts that vary widely from direct effects such as progressive temperature increases from global warming, flooding or heat waves due to increased climate variability and extreme weather events, to indirect effects such as changes in ecosystem services, food productivity or species distributions (Montag et al. 2017). VBDs are clearly highly intertwined with climate change and the extent of biodiversity (Engering et al. 2013).

Table 4.1Main vectors and diseases they transmit MosquitoesTicksSandfliesTriatomine bugsTsetse fliesFleasBlack fliesAquatic snailsLice AedesAnophelesCulex
Table 4.1Main vectors and diseases they transmit MosquitoesTicksSandfliesTriatomine bugsTsetse fliesFleasBlack fliesAquatic snailsLice AedesAnophelesCulex

Disease-Transmitting Mosquitoes and Ticks

  • Influence of Temperature on Vector Mosquitoes and Associated Pathogens
  • Distributional Changes of Mosquito Vector Species
  • Distributional Changes of Ticks in Europe

In arboviruses, temperature affects plaque growth (Jia et al. 2007) and replication rate (Kilpatrick et al. 2008). There are objective reasons why climate change affects the distribution and seasonal activity of disease-transmitting ticks (Ogden et al. 2014).

Biodiversity and VBDs: The Large Unknowns .1 Pathogen Diversity

  • Vector Diversity
  • Host Diversity

However, large knowledge gaps still exist regarding the diversity of reservoir hosts for mosquito- and tick-borne pathogens in old and new distribution areas (Baráková et al. 2018; Hashiguchi et al. 2018). This model also applies to other vector-host systems where a generalist vector uses many host species, only a few of which are competent reservoir hosts (Swaddle and Calos 2008; Civitello et al. 2015).

How to Manage VBDs?

  • Chemical Insecticides
  • Biological Insecticides
  • New Genetic Tools in Vector Control
  • Sustainable Control Programs

This theoretically self-sustaining Wolbachia method is now in the large-scale trial phase (reviewed in Mishra et al. 2018). Vu etc. 1998) and are now also proposed as biological agents against Culex mosquitoes.

Responses to VBDs Along with Biodiversity Loss and Climate Change

  • Target the Complexity
  • Interconnecting People and Knowledge
  • Policy Options

Friederike Reuss is funded by the Hessian Center on Climate Change of the Hessian Agency for Conservation, Environment and Geology. Montag D, Kuch U, Rodriguez L, Müller R (2017) Overview of the panel on biodiversity and health under climate change.

The Influence of Socio-economic and Socio-demographic Factors

Introduction

Interest in research has recently increased regarding the role that urban green spaces can play in improving the health of urban residents (Hartig et al. 2014). In particular, the effects of urban green spaces on urban health, depending on accessibility and socio-economic status/trends, are investigated.

Methods

This suggests a more complex relationship between availability and accessibility of urban green spaces and socio-economic differences, which depends on the indicators used to measure greenness, availability and quality characteristics of urban green spaces. The term 'socio-economic confounder' is used in this chapter to describe factors that have a potential impact on health and may even nullify a possible link between urban green space and health outcomes.

published within the last 5 years (2013–2017, Fig. 5.1). The analysis was therefore  restricted to papers published in English from 2013 onward to highlight recent  advances in the subject
published within the last 5 years (2013–2017, Fig. 5.1). The analysis was therefore restricted to papers published in English from 2013 onward to highlight recent advances in the subject

Results

  • Mental Health and General Health
  • Birth Outcome
  • Overweight
  • Physical Activity, Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality
  • Green Space Metrics, Buffers and Data Used
  • Confounding Factors

Association between green space and stress became non-significant after adjustment for confounders (Cusack et al. Padilla et al. 2016) showed that the significant association between green space and stress disappeared when models were adjusted for socio-economic confounders.

Table 5.1The main characteristics and results of studies on greenness and health by confounding factors ReferencesCountry, cityAimHEALTHStudy designGreen space metrics and bufferConfounderMain results Abelt and  McLafferty  (2017)U.S., New YorkAssessment o
Table 5.1The main characteristics and results of studies on greenness and health by confounding factors ReferencesCountry, cityAimHEALTHStudy designGreen space metrics and bufferConfounderMain results Abelt and  McLafferty (2017)U.S., New YorkAssessment o

Discussion

  • Urban Green Space and Health Outcomes in Relation to Socio-demographic and Socio-economic Confounders
  • Implications for Urban Policy and Planning
  • Directions for Future Research

Furthermore, the mediating effect of urban greenery was highlighted for lower-income or disadvantaged groups (Flouri et al. Some relationships between greenery and health seemed to be stronger for people living in low-income areas (Xu et al. 2017).

Conclusion

Cusack L et al (2017) Associations between multiple green space measures and birth weight across two US cities. Thompson CW et al (2016) Mitigating stress and supporting health in deprived urban communities: the importance of green space and the social environment.

Green Spaces and Child Health and Development

  • Potential Mechanisms
  • Pregnancy and Childhood as Important Windows of Vulnerability
  • Pregnancy Outcomes and Complications
  • Brain Development
  • Respiratory and Allergic Conditions
  • Cardiometabolic Risk Factors
  • Final Remarks

The available evidence on the effects of green spaces on asthma and allergic conditions in children is inconsistent (Lambert et al. 2017). Dadvand P et al (2018b) Green space use and blood glucose in children; a population-based study CASPIAN-V.

Biodiversity, Mental Health and Spiritual Well-being

Theoretical Foundations of Biodiversity and Mental Well-being Relationships

Introduction

Biodiversity also helps to mitigate the negative effects of climate change on human health (see Lindley et al. However, biodiversity (with climate change) can also harm human health by dispersing pollen and increasing contact with disease-carrying organisms (Vaz et al.).

Environmental Preference

  • Aesthetic Model of Preferences
  • Preference Matrix
    • Connection to Biodiversity in the Preference Matrix
  • Fractal Geometry and Visual Fluency
    • Connection to Biodiversity with Fractals
    • Fractal Dimension and Preference
    • Fractal Dimension and Restorative Outcomes
  • Biophilia Hypothesis
    • Connection to Biodiversity in the Biophilia Hypothesis

Further support for the preference for mid-range D scores was found in the study by Bies et al. (2016) that examined preferences for statistical (fractals that do not repeat exactly but have the same statistical properties as they occur in nature) or exact (fractal patterns that repeat exactly, created by a computer program) fractals. The biophilia hypothesis emphasizes people's positive response to nature, which may manifest itself in a preference for specific animals, plants or environments (Hartig et al. 2011).

Fig. 7.1  Pictures of natural fractals, demonstrating self-similarity in which a repeated pattern is a  reduced-size copy of the whole
Fig. 7.1 Pictures of natural fractals, demonstrating self-similarity in which a repeated pattern is a reduced-size copy of the whole

Theories of Restorative Environments

  • Stress Reduction Theory (SRT)
    • Connection to Biodiversity in the SRT
  • Attention Restoration Theory (ART)
    • Connection to Biodiversity in the ART

Biodiversity was not a concept used in the original theoretical writings of RTSH. Most strikingly, coherence was rated significantly lower in the desert environment compared to the other three landscapes (see Fig. 7.3).

Fig. 7.2 Simplified  version of the Stress  Reduction Theory of  affective/arousal response  to a natural environment
Fig. 7.2 Simplified version of the Stress Reduction Theory of affective/arousal response to a natural environment

Ecosystem Services Cascade Model

  • Connection to Health and Well-being in the Ecosystem Service Cascade Model

Most research on the benefits of ecosystem services to human health and well-being focuses on the physical health benefits of providing and regulating ecosystem services (Sandifer et al. 2015). The exact chance pathways linking biodiversity to physical and mental health and well-being through the Cascade model are little understood (Sandifer et al. 2015).

Discussion

The Ecosystem Service Cascade Model discusses human health and well-being as benefits derived from biodiversity and ecosystem services (Haines-Young and Potschin 2010; Potschin and Haines-Young 2011), but little research links ecosystem services to human health and well-being (Sandifer et al.). But since biodiversity itself can occur at any stage of the Ecosystem Service Cascade Model, it is still unclear what the exact casual pathways are that link biodiversity to health and well-being (Sandifer et al. 2015).

Table 7.2  Summary of the six frameworks offering perspective on biodiversity and mental well-  being relationships with descriptions of how biodiversity and mental well-being are conceptualised,  and the mediating pathways that could explain biodiversity-
Table 7.2 Summary of the six frameworks offering perspective on biodiversity and mental well- being relationships with descriptions of how biodiversity and mental well-being are conceptualised, and the mediating pathways that could explain biodiversity-

Biodiversity in the Context

Key Concepts

  • Biodiversity
  • Mental Health and Well-Being
  • Linking Biodiversity to Mental Health: Research Questions and Conceptual Model

That is why we also discuss the concepts of mental health and mental well-being, albeit less extensively. When we use the term “mental health” throughout the remainder of this chapter, mental well-being is implied.

Measurement of Biodiversity

  • Characteristics of Nature in General
  • The Object to Be Assessed: The Biodiversity of What?
  • How to Measure Distance?
  • Aggregating Biodiversity Across Different Areas
  • Type of Access Metric
  • Actual Versus Perceived Biodiversity
  • Access Versus Exposure, and Type of Contact
  • Mediators, Confounders and Covariates

Another approach is to assess biodiversity at the level of the residential environment as a whole. Information on the level of biodiversity, in terms of species diversity, is not always available.

Concluding Remarks

Dallimer M, Irvine KN, Skinner AM et al (2012) Biodiversity and the well-being factor: understanding the links between human self-reported well-being and species richness. Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S et al (2007) Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review.

Review of the Mental Health

Introduction

To date, only one systematic review has explicitly investigated the health and well-being benefits of contact with biodiversity (Lovell et al. 2014). Describe the state and nature of the body of evidence published since the review by Lovell et al. 2014), in relation to biodiversity with mental health and well-being;.

Methods

  • Literature Review
  • Characteristics of the Recent Literature

Biodiversity indicators were classified based on the levels of biodiversity identified by Botzat et al. 2016) – namely ecosystems/habitats (e.g. parks, forests); communities of species (eg plants, birds, butterflies); or individual species. Abundance may be more important for mental health or mental well-being than the number of different species (Dallimer et al. 2012).

Fig. 9.1  Process of literature review and identified relevant articles
Fig. 9.1 Process of literature review and identified relevant articles

Gambar

Fig. 2.1  Determinants of human health and well-being (Barton and Grant 2006, based on Dahlgren  and Whitehead 1991), including biodiversity at the human scale (after Garrett 2015, Ruokolainen  et al
Fig. 2.2  Pathways for physiological outcomes associated with ‘exposure to natural environments’
Fig. 2.3  The inter-relationships between human and ecological health as expressed through the  exposome concept (top) and the pathways to reductions in physical health through dysbiosis  (bot-tom) (Renz et al
Fig. 2.4  Biodiversity metrics and some of the ecosystem functions underpinning physical human  health (top – Schwarz et al
+7

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Studi terbaru pada tanaman herbal yang memiliki komponen bioaktif telah menunjukkan efek anti kanker payudara yang kuat, yang dapat melalui berbagai mekanisme seperti