• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

The challenge of slow economic development within the countryside - is one which gives rise to a plethora of opportunistic problems that ultimately directly and indirectly compromises the quality of the life and living conditions in many rural areas in developing countries like South Africa. This challenge was also prevalent within Umzumbe Phungashe Sub-Region, which was used as the case study in this research. The rationale behind this study is that rural areas, in both developed countries as well as in developing countries like South Africa, remain largely under-developed. This is despite initiatives such as projects targeted at stimulating Rural Local Economic Development (RLED). RLED is viewed by both the government and theorists alike as an imperative approach towards the achievement of sustained development of rural areas (Rogerson, 2006; Davis, 2006 and Nel and Rogerson, 2007). They argue that if RLED is carried out successfully, it has the potential to remedy the injustices of our historical legacy, such as; poverty, exclusion, escalating unemployment rate, infrastructural backlog, brain drain from rural to urban areas, migration of skilled labours, lack of opportunities and poor planning amongst others; which inevitably hinder the improvement of the living standards in the countryside.

It is against this background that this dissertation proposed a deconstruction of the barriers hindering sustained RLED, in a quest deal with the challenge of slow economic development in rural areas, while simultaneously crafting strategies to stimulate and promote sustained local economic development within the countryside. The process, method and approach of deconstruction is important; not only in highlighting the obstacles to it successful implementation, but in helping to forge more innovative solutions to deal with those factors that hinder its success.

The study sought to rigorously deconstruct the most salient hindering factors, contributing to the slow rate of Rural Local Economic Development; while simultaneously proposing innovative indigenous strategies to deal with the former. It aimed to this through investigating a number of issues, such as to:-

 Evaluate approaches and model of LED which have been utilised internationally and elsewhere in Africa;

 Investigate the most salient contributing factors to the slow rate of Rural Local Economic Development in South Africa, with the emphasis of KwaZulu-Natal;

 Identify innovative indigenous strategies that can be used or formulated (in the absence of efficient ones) to spur sustained Rural Local Economic Development; by using the case study of Umzumbe Phungashe Sub-Region;

 Investigate the reason(s) for the reluctance of big businesses (and other potential investors) to invest in rural areas; and,

 Identify what contribution localised indigenous initiatives have to offer traditional top-down LED projects.

The main theme under study, which is Local Economic Development within the countryside, was broadly discussed, stemming from its background, definitions, evolution and approaches and strategies that guide it. Furthermore, postmodernism and deconstruction as an epistemological approach to unpacking the factors that attribute to the slow rate and modest results of Local Economic Development in rural areas was discussed together with other complementary concepts such as; rurality, ruralisation, re-imagining rural areas and reframing development. The broad overarching policy framework that directly or indirectly impacts on Local Economic Development within the countryside was also discussed.

In this dissertation globalisation has been discussed together with its associated theories and factors that promote and drive it. This analysis has been carried out in a quest to provide a foundation to evaluate the relationship between globalisation and Local Economic Development within the countryside, under the theme “globalisation a challenge- opportunity”, which alludes to the notion that in cases where globalisation poses a challenge; that it should be dealt with efficiently and effectively to ensure that such is

ultimately turned into an opportunity. Furthermore, various cases studies from both developed and developing countries have been investigated to identify both challenges and opportunities; while simultaneously identifying lessons that can be learnt from such.

A rigorous analysis of the study area or case study highlighting its strengths and weaknesses was carried out in this dissertation. This was carried out in an effort to identify those challenges that impact negatively on the rate of Rural Local Economic Development, so that credible solutions to deal with such can be crafted. Furthermore, the analysis intended to identify the strong points that the area possesses so that they can be strengthened and exploited to help promote sustained rural development.

In summary the dissertation found that there are a plethora factors that have been identified as the most salient factors hindering sustained Rural Local Economic Development in the area. These factors inter alia; have been the lack of understanding of what Local Economic Development is and what it is meant to achieve and how. Low literacy levels, investment in under-researched projects that do not speak to the needs of the community, corruption, poor project management skills and inadequate infrastructure have all worked against the development of successful economic strategy. The involvement of all stakeholders in the area has been identified as the main turning point in eradicating the barriers hindering Local Economic Development. From such forums it is argued that more innovative and homebrewed solutions can be produced - which have better chances of successfully eradicating these barriers.

The adopted method of deconstruction together with postmodernism as an approach to knowledge created an enabling environment for the dissertation to investigate the root causes of the factors that contribute to the failure of the LED strategies. The dissertation has helped bridge the gap in the studies that have highlighted the obstacles to RLED, while failing to eloquently debunk the inertia for these challenges and forge more innovative solutions to eradicate such.

The dissertation challenges the orthodox production of knowledge to solving problems through merely adopting foreign tools and strategies aimed at stimulating RLED. Research has proven that in many instances these imported tools and strategies are not necessarily appropriate to achieve successful implementation in

developing areas. Without a clear comprehension of the specific local factors that make an area unique, generalised LED strategies are bound to fail because they do not address these factors directly. Little notice is taken of indigenous knowledge which could support LED strategies. The modernist approach to problems of one tool fits all has proven inadequate in so far as dealing with a number of social problems, such as poverty relief, crime, substance abuse and RLED amongst others.

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

Aliber, M. (2005): Overcoming Underdevelopment in South Africa’s Second Economy, in UNDP South Africa.

Amin, A. (1999): An institutional perspective on regional economic development, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), pp. 365–378.

Arno, T. (2006): From the “Washington” towards a “Vienna Consensus”? A quantitative analysis on globalization, development and global governance. Paper, prepared for the discussion process leading up to the EU-Latin America and Caribbean Summit 2006, May 11, 2006 to May 12, 2006, Vienna, Austria. Centro Argentino de Estudios Internacionales, Buenos Aires.

Babbie E. and Mouton, J. (2001): The Practice of Social Research, Southern Africa, Oxford University Press.

Bateman, M., Pablo Duran Ortíz, J., and Maclean, K, (2011): A Post-Washington Consensus Approach to Local Economic Development in Latin America? An Example from Medellín, Colombia: Background Note; Overseas Development Institute.

Berry, J. W. (2003): Conceptual Approaches to Acculturation. In K. M. Chun, P. B.

Organista, & G. Marín (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in Theory, Measurement and Applied Research (pp. 17-37). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Beck, Ulrich, Sznaider, Natan and Winter, Rainer, eds. (2003): Global America? The Cultural Consequences of Globalization. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

Binns, T. and Nel, E. (2002): Devolving Development: Integrated Development Planning and Developmental Local Government in Post-apartheid South Africa, Regional Studies, 36(8), pp. 921–932.

Bond, P. (2002): Local economic development debates in South Africa, Municipal Services Project, and Occasional Papers No. 6 (University of the Witwatersrand: Johannesburg).

Bogdan, R. and Biklen, C. (2006): Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Bond, P., (1998): Local Economic Development and the Municipal Services Crisis In Post- apartheid South Africa: the Case of Stutterheim. Urban Forum 9:2.

Burton. D., (2000): Research Training for Social Scientists: A Handbook for Postgraduate Researchers, SAGE Publications, London, pp 1-503.

Blakely, E. J. (1994): Planning Local Economic Development: Theory and Practice, 2nd edition Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Cornwall, A and Deborah, E., (2010): Deconstructing Development Discourse Buzzwords and Fuzzwords. Oxfam GB.

Davis, J.R (2006): Evaluating and Disseminating Experiences in Local Economic Development: Observations on Integrated Development Programmes of the Free State, Republic of South Africa; Working Paper: Natural Resources Institute.

Dear, M. (2001): The Postmodern Turn, in Mninca, C (ed.), Postmodern Geography:

Theory and Practice, Oxford, Blackwell, 1-34.

DPLG, “Department Provincial and Local Government” (2010): Stimulating and Developing Sustainable Local Economies: National Framework for Local Economic Development (LED) in South Africa (2006 – 2011).

DPLG “Department Provincial and Local Government” (2001): Refocusing development on the poor – Draft LED policy paper. Pretoria: DPLG.

DPLG“Department Provincial and Local Government” (2006): Stimulating and developing sustainable local economies: National framework for local economic development (LED) in South Africa. Pretoria: DPLG.

Giddens, A (1990): The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Giddens, A. (2002): Runaway World: How Globalisation is Shaping our Lives. London:

Profile Books.

Gills, Barry, ed. (2000): Globalization and the Politics of Resistance. London: Palgrave.

Held, David and McGrew, Anthony, eds. (2002) Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Held, D and McGrew, eds. (2003): The Great Globalization Debate: An Introduction. In The Global Transformations Reader, edited by David Held and Anthony McGrew, pp 1-50.

Cambridge: Polity Press.

Heaton, J. (2004): Reworking Qualitative Data. London: SAGE Publications.

Helmsing, A.H.J, (2003: Local economic development: New generations of actors, policies and instruments for Africa. Public Administration and Development 23, 67–76.

Hindson, H and Vicente, V (2005): Whither LED in South Africa? A Commentary on the Policy Guidelines for Implementing Local Economic Development in South Africa.

Hopkins, A.G. (2002): The History of Globalisation – and the Globalisation of History? In Globalisation in World History, edited by A.G. Hopkins, pp11-46. London: Pimlico.

Hopper, P. (2007) Understanding Cultural Globalization. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Kajornboon, A., (2011): Using interviews as research instruments: Language Institute Chulalongkorn University.

Huntington, Samuel P. (1996): The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. London: Simon and Schuster.

Keane, J. (2003): Global Civil Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Kottak. P (2007): The cultural integration of immigrants: A survey based upon the papers and proceedings of the UNESCO Conference held in Havana, April 1956. New York:

Columbia University Press [email protected] Page 23

Kevin, O and Macgarvey, A., (2003): Rural women and local economic development in south-west Victoria, Journal of Rural Studies 19 (2003) 173–186.

Lindlof, G. and Taylor, V., (2008): Qualitative Communication Research Methods, 2nd Edition. SAGE, Thousand Oaks.

Lee, H., (2009): Christianity and the Postmodern Turn: A Critique of Postmodern Epistemology.

Legraine, C (2002): The Challenges of Globalization for Development in Southern Africa Development Southern Africa Vol 18, No 1.

Luke, M. (2010): Sociology at the University of Sussex and author of The Sociology of Globalization, Polity Press.

Mandle, J. R. (2003): Globalization and the Poor. Cambridge University Press United Kingdom

Murray, E. (2006): Geographies of Globalization. New York: Routledge

Manona, S., (2005): Smallholder Agriculture as Local Economic DEVELOPMENT (LED) Strategy in Rural South Africa: Exploring Prospects in Pondoland, Eastern Cape.

University of the Western Cape, South Africa.

Markey, S.; Halseth, G; and Manson, D, (2008): Challenging the inevitability of rural decline: Advancing the policy of place in northern British Columbia, Journal of Rural Studies 24 (2008) 409–421.

Mayoux, L. (2001): From Marginalization to Empowerment Towards A New Approach in Small Enterprise Development: Paper presented to SDC Employment and Income Division Workshop.

Marais, L., Barnes, L. and Schoeman, J., (2002): A Provincial Comparison of Post- apartheid Housing Policy and Delivery: The Free State and Northern Cape as Case Studies, in Donaldson, R. and Marais, L. (eds.), Transforming Rural and Urban Spaces in South Africa During the 1990s. Reform, Restitution, Restructuring, Africa Institute of South Africa, Pretoria, pp. 381-406.

Meyer-Stamer, J. (2006): The Hexagon of Local Economic Development and LED in South Africa, meso-partner working paper No. 05, Duisburg.

Mitchell, D. (2001): Postmodern Geographical Praxis? The Postmodern impulse and the war against the homeless people in the Post- Justrice City, in Minca, C (ed.) Postmoddern Geography, Theory and Practice, Blackwell, Oxford, 57-92.

Musakwa, W., (2009): Local Economic Development as a Poverty Alleviation Tool: a Case Study on the Urban Renewal Program in Kwamashu Durban. A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the Master of Science in Urban and Regional Planning; School of Architecture, Town Planning and Housing, University of Kwa-Zulu Natal.

MXA (2003): Report on the national policy and institutional landscape of the Consolidated Municipal Infrastructure and Local Economic Development Programmes, DPLG.