A Stakeholder Analysis of the UCt Hospital

(1)

University

of Cape

Town

I I i

I

(2)

The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source.

The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only.

Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author.

University

of Cape

Town

(3)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick Thomas: l\

are

(4)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick

1 1.1 1.2 1.3

1.4

1.5 1.6 2 2.1

2.2 2.3 2.4 25 2.6 2.7 3 3.1

4 4.1

4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 5

1

5.2

5.4

6

Motivation

Literature review

Matrix

,r_rlrlV::ITP interaction The South African sector

The sector

PPI - Africa

Instrumentation and

scenarios Table 5.8: Stakeholder

5.9: Stakeholder

5.10: <...r::l,valhrol,rj.oY

B:

of

of "no UCTH structures of PPI structures for the

for PPP of

References

4 1 7 8 9 9 9 10 12 12 15 15 19 20 22 24 26 28

28

29 30 30 31 32 33 33 33 34 35 35 36 37 38 39 39 39 40 42 43 44

47 48

53 54 56 58 60 61 62 65 66 67

(5)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick 4

care.

outcomes

a

(6)

University

of Cape

Town

Patnck Thomas: A Stakeholder of the UCT

- - - _ . _ - - - _ ^.._---

care to

sector.

actors.

(7)

University

of Cape

Town

Pal rick Thomas: A Siakehoider

(8)

University

of Cape

Town

Palrick Thomas: A Stakeholder Analysis ur the lXT 7

:1

1.1

(9)

University

of Cape

Town

was

(10)

University

of Cape

Town

1

A 1

1

9

avenues

(11)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick 10

no on

1

is as

(12)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick Th!lma~: A Stakeholder I J

(13)

University

of Cape

Town

1

Persons or groups that or interests in a

its

•

(14)

University

of Cape

Town

13

1

•

the current and

n::n'~I""lrc to

(15)

University

of Cape

Town

L ii iii.

a

14

(16)

University

of Cape

Town

(17)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick

1 2 3 4 5

1

sum are:

• •

•

• •

Thc~.:

an

in contrast to or

on

no worse

(18)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick Thomas: A Stakeholder

• •

•

17

(19)

University

of Cape

Town

•

• •

• +

• •

18

are:

(20)

University

of Cape

Town

• a

•

(21)

University

of Cape

Town

20

• is consumers

•

resources

(22)

University

of Cape

Town

To\vn; where hoth and

(23)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick Thomas: A Stakeholder of Ihe LJCT 22

--~---

(24)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick Thomas: A Slakeholder 23

(25)

University

of Cape

Town

Palnck Thomas: 1\ Stakeholdel

• •

•

oj the (JeT 24

(26)

University

of Cape

Town

Pal rick Thomas: Stakeholder

• •

•

• •

is

are:

(27)

University

of Cape

Town

26

(28)

University

of Cape

Town

II

(29)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick A Stakeholder

(30)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick

Rhiin Klinikull1 administration

group. vast III U U E " H V U H , systems

(31)

University

of Cape

Town

Pmrick 10

of several in South

(32)

University

of Cape

Town

31

J() G4 Groote

(33)

University

of Cape

Town

II II

Town

• Retain and recruit

• Imnrove access to resources

UCT Private Academic Hncnit::ll

• •

•

2002

•

over

UCT Private Acaaem Late 2003

(34)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick

to

1

In rlt>,~,. .. inti\

a

II stakeholders in the literature review.

(35)

University

of Cape

Town

1 2

some

is

(36)

University

of Cape

Town

Thomas: l\ Stakeholder

(37)

University

of Cape

Town

• •

•

• •

as

(38)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick Thomas: lI. Stakeholder

• •

•

1 2 3 4

were

can

(39)

University

of Cape

Town

(40)

University

of Cape

Town

1 2 3 4

(41)

University

of Cape

Town

Role of

RK times No

not not

Yes

12

14 Referred to as PA we

15 Additional Stakeholder: These stakeholders are not involved in the

success of the yet due 10 their role as than mere

stakdlOlders.

but Jess involvement in structures and

II Referred to NDoR

the the

(42)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick

a

(43)

University

of Cape

Town

B

..

III

o .. ..

sU[)Oosea to has

it is at a rllc:>rh,::>nro.rlt:l to us. But in a I

a it

(44)

University

of Cape

Town

Palrick

must be as

i t

! 1

!

(45)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick

(46)

University

of Cape

Town

Thoma,,,: A Stakeholder of t.he \JeT

1

(47)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick Thoma~:

some

say we a Golden Arrow of which we see their bills. It is a

for an because we are

if the medical section of the market.

were or ^/I

(48)

University

of Cape

Town

(49)

University

of Cape

Town

Current ideas Future for UCTH

• NnT ,nrprpc:Tpr! In rnmn;::l'tl't"nr I •

•

education at Closer business associations

of resources UCTH

• run npnpTlt<: GSH from UCTH • of the

•

Groote Schuur • Not interested contact

• amicable relations

Ward memorandum

• Problem of

•

• Financial cain • ^Noionqer

(50)

University

of Cape

Town^own intellectual to work for "

(51)

University

of Cape

Town

2

(52)

University

of Cape

Town

• •

•

are:

IP\J\JPFU;; on

(53)

University

of Cape

Town

I it is

resources.

(54)

University

of Cape

Town

-nlOmas: .A Stakehoider of the UCT Hospital

I •

' I I ! Some resources from

II to interactions

and I· Some at UGH state of the

II! Lots of scope for ovn::mcinn

""I-h,...!,.."..,,, shared which could be used at GSH

• Unsure of

•

Groote I one:"" ~""I:>tll"\ne: ,nhlh.t ,1"1<=>::.1 rn-nnp~:>t,nn I "

• rrl I 1=1=(,: MRT I=M(':

"

PAWC of interaction ,

Reauires adeouate contractina I ^II Definite

• I :

II or PPP

I : ^criteriabeneficial ^I^II ^No

Rhon

" ^No^ch~rinnnf rocru Irf""o.c I • 1\11::> I •

]9 With rcsncct to orovineia! and national rc!!ulations 2:overnin!! true PPP.

(55)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick

1 2 3 4 5 6

we can

can

we are not sure or

some core

as

(56)

University

of Cape

Town

1

2

3

a

(57)

University

of Cape

Town

UCT

Potential dissatisfaction PAwe

GSH NDoH

GSH RK

(58)

University

of Cape

Town

•

health-insurance contribution to a

conlract to health

(59)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick Thomas: A Slakehoider

eHG

RK

some

i t

(60)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick Thomas: 1\ Stakeholder

.. •

.. ..

• ..

.. ..

..

"At some not

case there a PO~:iSI[JII

we

and will for

and build on,

structure and

a

(61)

University

of Cape

Town

GSH Westcarc

NDoH

"~~"'.M"IM" with funds or medical aids.

GSH."

is a

in bold indicate nnr<'nr,;;a influence and are

and

if well

want to see

of

and to

i i t

(62)

University

of Cape

Town

(63)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick

co-

(64)

University

of Cape

Town

Patrick Thomas:

(65)

University

of Cape

Town

(66)

University

of Cape

Town

Patnck

1

• •

•

1 2 3

• Where would you like to

• Do you involved in

with the

t What interaction is there between and the sector

t Is there PPP for the use of resources, research and with GSH?

• Is there even scope for PPP?

2

t What interactions do you have with the

• this to any rln,,.,Y",Q t What are you out

• What other benefits would you like to

• What do you encounter in the and what would you like to do to tackle these?

• Where would you like to

• •

•

3

t When did you

• What were your

• What were the

•

• •

•

have on

it your

(67)

University

of Cape

Town

•

(68)

University

of Cape

Town

(69)

University

of Cape

Town

Palrick A SWkeholder

on

ere

(70)

University

of Cape

Town

no. 2

(71)

University

of Cape

Town

van