• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Annual Report 2012/13 - MFMA - National Treasury

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "Annual Report 2012/13 - MFMA - National Treasury"

Copied!
319
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)
(2)

Chapter 1:

Mayor’s Foreword and Executive Summary

Page 1

Component A: Mayor’s Foreword Page 2

Component B: Executive Summary Page 6

1.1 Municipal Manager’s Overview Page 8

1.2 Municipal Population, Functions and Environmental Overview Page 8

1.3 Service Delivery Overview Page 17

1.4 Financial Health Overview Page 18

1.5 Organisational Development Overview Page 19

1.6 Statutory Annual Report Process Page 21

Chapter 2:

Governance

Page 22

Component A: Political and Administrative Governance Page 23

2.1 Political and Administrative Governance Page 24

Component B: Intergovernmental Relations Page 30

Component C: Public Accountability and Participation Page 31

2.2 IDP Participation and Alignment Page 31

Component D: Corporate Governance Page 32

2.3 Risk Management Page 32

2.4 Anti-Corruption and Fraud Page 33

2.5 Supply Chain Management Page 34

2.6 Web-site (www.ga-segonyana.gov.za) Page 34

Chapter 3:

Service Delivery Performance

Page 35

Component A: Basic Services Page 38

3.1 Water provision Page 40

3.2 Waste Water (Sanitation) Provision Page 47

3.3 Electricity Page 53

3.4 Waste Management Page 59

3.5 Housing Page 64

3.6 Free Basic Services & Indigent Support Page 70

Component B: Roads and Transport Page 72

3.7 Roads, Transport and Stormwater Page 72

Component C: Planning and Development Page 74

3.8 Planning and Local Economic Development Page 74

Component D: Community & Social Services Page 86

3.9 Community and Social Services Page 86

Component E: Health Page 93

Index

(3)

3.10 Health Page 93

Component F: Safety and Security Page 94

3.11 Safety and Security Page 94

Component G: Financial Management Page 96

Component H: Institutional Development Page 108

Component I: Governance Page 114

Chapter 4:

Organisational Development Performance

Page 120

Component A: Introduction to the Municipal Personnel Page 121

4.1 Employee totals, turnover and vacancies Page 121

Component B: Managing the Municipal Workforce Page 124

4.2 Policies Page 124

4.3 Monitoring and Evaluation Page 126

Component C: Employment Equity Status Page 127

Component D: Capacitating the Municipal Workforce Page 132

Component E: Managing the Workforce Expenditure Page 135

Chapter 5:

Financial Performance

Page 137

5.1 Statements of Financial Position Page 138

5.2 Grants Page 141

5.3 Assets Page 142

5.4 Basic Service Delivery Page 143

Component A: Capital Budget Page 144

Component B: Cash Flow Management and Investments Page 147

5.5 Cash flows Page 147

5.6 Investments Page 148

5.7 Borrowing Page 149

Component C: Disclosure of Staff Remuneration Page 150

Chapter 6:

Report of the Auditor General for the 2011/2012 Financial Year

Page 152

Chapter 7:

Audited Financial Statements for the 2012/2013 Financial Year

Page 168

Chapter 8:

Report of the Auditor General for the 2012/2013 Financial Year

Page 297

(4)

1

(5)

2

Component A: Mayor’s Foreword

We, as a municipality is driven by a set of key priority areas that determine our overall agenda. Objective are set for these priority areas, which are as follow:

x Water x Sanitation

x Roads and Transport x Electricity

x Land Development x Housing

x LED and Poverty Alleviation x Health

x Sport, recreation and community facilities x Refuse collection

x Education x Social Welfare

x Municipal Capacity and Infrastructure x Cemeteries

x Telkom and Postal Services

Key Policy Developments

Within the context of the above-mentioned vision, we are especially proud about the following achievements that we have managed to realise during 2012/13.

Dear Community of Ga-Segonyana, the Municipality are

continuously striving to enhance service delivery to create a better life for all people of Ga-Segonyana. This is clearly defined in our vision and mission statement.

Vision

In Ga-Segonyana, our vision is “To be an integrated municipality that is committed to the creation of a better life through sustainable development for the people of Ga-Segonyana.. For us this is more than merely words – we are working actively to make it true for all our people.

“What is it then that you are actually doing?” you may ask. For us, this summarised in our mission statement; “Ensuring the delivery of quality and affordable services, in a sustainable manner that enhances good governance, equity and responsibility to the people of Ga-Segonyana”.

(6)

3

During 2012/2013 the following policies were developed and or reviewed:

x Department Financial Services o Travel and Subsistence o Supply chain

x Department Corporate Services and LED o Acting allowance

o Leave encashment policy o Night shift standby allowance o Employment on probation o Fraud and anti-corruption policy o Induction policy

o Overtime policy o Recruitment policy o Retirement policy

o Subsistence and travelling allowance policy o Leave and procedure policy

x Department Community Services o Draft Fleet policy

o Draft Outdoor policy

Key Service Delivery Improvements

Specific improvements in service delivery achieved in the community during the 2012/13 financial year x Department Technical Services

o Water Projects

o Roads project and regular maintenance of gravel roads.

o Electricity ( high mast lights)

x Office of the Municipal Manager

o Annual PMS assessments in terms of service delivery done for top management

x Department Community Services

o Refuse managememt:7893kl of septic tanks sucked

o Refuse removal: 3221 households done weekly and 5576 business done

o 27 parks managed and maintained, including 3 new parks done by Department of Environmental Affair(DEAT) , Indalo Yethu Programme

o 20 kilometres of road paintings done o 844 roadworthy vehicle testing done o 15 road sighs repaired and installed

o Maintenance of cemetery in 8 wards completed

(7)

4

o 17 poor families assisted with R950 for coffins

o Library development grant spent according to activities as outlined in the business plan o 3934 inquiries attended at library

o 38 disaster incident done

Public Participation

Our Municipality involve our communities in our affairs by means of public advertisements of our Integrated Development Plan and Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan, as well as our performance plans, with specific reference to the Annual Report. We also advertise the activities of the Oversight Report and invite participation from our communities.

Our community also participate through the structures of the IDP Representative Forum and the annual IDP and budget road shows that we conduct annually.

We also conduct public engagement session when major new (or reviewed) by-laws, policies, strategic or sector plans and strategies are considered.

Remaining Challenges

Department of Finances

Audit opinion - Disclaimer

Increasing debt due to non-culture payment

Manual meter readings

Non adherence to supply chain process

Inadequate funding to address aging infrastructure

Data integrity both for billing and meters installed

Validate the correction of indigent register

Affordability of long term borrowing

Low staff morale

Department Corporate Services and LED

Cascading down of the PMS system

Technical Challenges

Provision of basic sanitation

Upgrading of roads

Municipal resources

Counter funding for bulk or capital projects

(8)

5

Local Economic Development

Development and servicing of both residential and business sites.

Illegal land invasion

Bulk electricity supply hampering development

Bulk water supply hampering development

Community Services

Waste management is done by service provider Uhuru Environmental PTY.LTD

Future Actions

Our immediate future priorities to improve our services will be as follows:

Financial Services:

x Developed action plan to address auditor general queries

x Enforce Credit Control Debt Collection policy to curb increasing debt

Technical Services:

x Business plans has been drawn up to source funding x Three year plan readily available for funded projects

Community Service:

x Greening and beautify of Town and Mothibistad Stadium x To have cleaning campaigns in Mothibistad and Town

Conclusion

This Report is our feedback to you, our loyal friends and compatriots. It contains particulars of what we achieved during the past financial year (2012/13) and give an overview of the obstacles that remain in realising our vision and mission above. We believed that we have made important strides in fulfilling our Government’s mandate to create a better life for all – especially the most vulnerable and poor in our society.

(9)

6

Component B: Executive Summary

1.1 Municipal Manager’s Overview

Service Delivery performance

We are reasonably satisfied that we, as managers, have contributed positively towards Council’s service delivery successes in 2012/13. However, there were also several challenges that need to be addressed. In this regard, the following could be highlighted:

x All indigent households have access to free basic sanitation, electricity and water at a basic level.

x Completion of Phase I of the Bankhara-Bodulong sewerage outflow project x Construction of additional high mast lights

x Development of a Housing Chapter in collaboration with the district municipality x The grading of 1,600 km of roads

x Promoting tourism through a variety of initiatives, including The Eye x Strengthening of the Administration

x Improving the financial viability of the municipality

The 2012/13 financial year has been a challenging, yet successful one for us. We have managed to make important progress towards a better life for all our communities, and have improved our institutional response systems and capacity considerably. Yet, there is no denying that still needs to be done.

We strive towards improving service delivery, taking into consideration the following values.

x To deliver quality, affordable and sustainable services

x To serve the people in an accountable, equitable and transparent manner.

x To nourish the spirit of self-reliance and co-operative governance x To build a culture of payment and a spirit of belonging and

ownership amongst our people

x To implement all our plans through leadership and commitment.

x To promote integrated human settlement.

x To deal with our customers in a friendly and honest manner to acknowledge their human dignity.

(10)

7

Policies and related administrative matters

The municipality has maintained registers of the required administrative and financial policies throughout the 2012/13 financial year. The employment equity plan was reviewed and progress reports about its implementation submitted to the Department of Labour. The following important plans and policies were also reviewed and/or implemented:

x Department Financial Services New policies developed:

o Borrowing

o Cash management and Investment o Funding and Reserve

The following policies were reviewed o Asset management

o Supply Chain Management

x Department Corporate Services

New and reviewed policies during 2012/13:

o Recruitment policy(Revise) o Retention of Skilled Personnel o Land disposal policy

o Travelling allowance o Induction policy

o Training and development/Study policy o Leave Encashment Policy

o Housing Help/Assistance o Standby, Shift Allowance policy o Occupation Health and Safety o Contract workers

o Laptop policy

o Telephone usage policy o Cellular phone policy o Catering policy o Retirement policy

x Policies to be developed or reviewed in 2013/14:

o Department of Finances:

ƒ Credit Control and De

ƒ Indigent

ƒ Property rates

ƒ Budget and Virement

ƒ Bulk Contribution

ƒ Asset Management

ƒ Supply Chain

ƒ Tariff Policy

ƒ Travel and Subsistence

ƒ Cellphone

(11)

8

ƒ Fraud and Prevention

o Department Corporate Services:

ƒ Retention of Skilled personnel

ƒ Councilors Funeral policy

ƒ Probation policy

ƒ Training and development policy

ƒ Recruitment policy

ƒ Employee Funeral policy

Shared Services

The municipality entered into an agreement with the district municipality for the utilisation of the following shared services:

Internal Audit (JTG District Municipality)

IT Shared service (new) JTG District municipality

Risk management (JTG District municipality

1.2 Municipal Population, Functions and Environmental Overview

Ga-Segonyana Local Municipality is an administrative area in the John Taolo Gaetsewe District of the Northern Cape in South Africa.

Segonyana is the Setswana name of a spring, commonly known as the Eye.

John Taolo Gaetsewe (formerly Kgalagadi) is one of the five districts of the Northern Cape province of South Africa. The seat of the authority is Kuruman. The majority of its people speak Setswana. (Source: http://www.ga- segonyana.gov.za)

Ga-Segonyana Municipality is a former cross-boundary municipality with areas in the Northern Cape and the North- West Province. The municipal jurisdiction consists of 33 residential areas within a radius of approximately 80km in and around Kuruman, and has approximately 75,000 residents.

The municipality’s economy is mainly based on the surrounding mining and agricultural activities. The municipal seat, Kuruman, is situated on the Namaquari route, forming part of the main route between Gauteng and Namibia and Cape Town via Upington.

(Source: http://www.kurumankalahari.co.za)

Ga-Segonyana Municipality was a cross-boundary municipality that straddled the boundary between the North-West and Northern Cape Provinces. It was established in 2000 through the amalgamation of Kuruman and Mothibistad Municipalities and includes sections of the Bophirima District Municipality. The process of amalgamation of the cross-boundary municipalities started in 2006, with the official handing over by the various departments scheduled for 1 April 2007.

80% of the population, of roughly 70 400, stay in rural villages, or lives and works on commercial farms.

(12)

9

Figure / Table 1.1: Map of the Kuruman

(Source: Google Map Maker)

Figure / Table 1.2: Map of the Ga-Segonyana municipal area

(Source: Municipal Demarcation Board)

(13)

10

There are 33 residential areas divided into thirteen wards, and the council consists of thirteen wards and thirteen proportional representative (PR) councillors.

The economy of Ga-Segonyana is based on mining and agriculture (both commercial and subsistence), with tourism and commercial sectors contributing to a vibrant economy centred in Kuruman. Huge development in the

surrounding mining areas is leading to extreme development in our area. Despite various challenges, all sectors of the economy have growth potential which can attract investors and entrepreneurs.

(Source: IDP, 2007/08)

Dependency ratio was at 58,1% and educational status was at 8,4% went through higher education, 29% attended school, 20,6% attended matric in the Ga-Segonyana Municipality area of jurisdiction. The unemployment rate was 33, 7% during the 2011 census. Economy of the municipality is reliant on mining, agriculture, tourism and commercial sector in and around Kuruman town. Rapid mining development lead to extreme pressure on resources planning and allocation in that, these developments does not allow for thorough assessment of availability resources like the availability of water, electricity, waste management, sanitation and other municipal services.

Population demographics of the municipality is at 93651 constituting of 48 957 females and 44 994 being males across different racial lines. The municipality is situated at 1 340 metres above sea level and at the brim of the Kalahari, this has resulted in the area having extreme temperatures which is very cold in winter and very hot in summer. It experiences summer rainfall and an annual rainfall of 266mm which fall from mid-November to end of April.

Ga-Segonyana depends on underground water supply for its domestic, agricultural and commercial demand and use.

(LM, 2013 Status Quo Analysis Report) Figure / Table 1.3: Population

(Source: Statistic South Africa: Census 2001 and Community Survey 2007 and Census 2011)

Census

2001

Commun ity Survey

2007

Census

2011

Age Category Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total

0-4 3996 3946 7942 3841 3545 7386 5765 5400 11164

5-9 4278 4108 8386 3804 3302 7106 4941 4953 9894

10-14 4253 4303 8556 4261 3893 8154 4745 4637 9382

15-19 4311 4381 8692 4255 4105 8360 4721 4761 9482

20-24 2936 3522 6458 2879 3613 6492 4326 4368 8693

25-29 2268 3024 5292 2544 2757 5301 3997 4391 8388

30-34 2164 2638 4802 2089 2565 4654 3551 3908 7458

35-39 2060 2466 4526 2108 2339 4447 2933 3350 6282

40-44 1957 2095 4052 1723 2302 4025 2436 2720 5156

45-49 1401 1672 3073 1481 2050 3531 2046 2504 4551

50-54 1091 1277 2368 1144 1480 2624 1748 2134 3882

55-59 873 979 1852 1194 1345 2539 1383 1735 3117

60-64 585 873 1458 599 916 1515 969 1248 2216

65-69 454 723 1177 620 894 1514 624 852 1476

70-74 277 511 788 264 562 826 363 658 1021

75-79 161 298 459 422 493 915 236 484 720

80-84 95 203 298 111 108 219 144 316 460

85+ 58 152 210 58 124 182 67 242 308

33218 37171 70389 33397 36393 69790 44995 48661 93650

(14)

11

According to Census 2011 the total population are 93652, the density is 20.8/.km2 and there are 26 816 households.

87% of the population are Black Africans, 7.6% are coloured, 4.6% are white and 0.4% are Indian/ Asian. 78% of the population’s first language are Tswana, 12.7% are Afrikaans, 2.9% English, 1% are Southern Ndebele and 5%

other languages. (Source: http://en.wikipedia.org) 43% of the population are below the age of 20 years, 53% are between 20 and 64 years and 4% are older than 65 years.

Figure / Table 1.4: Basic demographic profile (StatsSA, Municipal Fact Sheet, Census , 2011)

(Source: Statistic South Africa: Census 2001 and Census 2011)

It is clear that the trend in the Ga-Segonyana municipal area is towards a growing population. This is largely attributable to the mining activities in the area. This movement of people is predominantly from the municipal jurisdiction area of the Joe Morolong municipality.

Figure / Table 1.5: Population according to gender

(Source: Statistic South Africa: Census 2011)

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0

Younger than 15

years Between 15 and

64 years 65 Years and older 35.4

60.5

4.2 32.5

63.2

4.3

Y2001 Y2011

Category

Unit of

measurement 2001 2011

Population No of persons 70,392 93,651

Age S tructure

Younger than 15 years No of persons 35.4 32.5 Between 15 and 64 years No of persons 60.5 63.2 65 Years and older No of persons 4.2 4.3 Dependency ratio Per 100 (ages 15-64) 65.3 58.1 Sex Ratio

M ales per 100

females 89.4 92.5

1996-2001 2001-2011 Population growth Percentage per year 2.6 2.9 Basic demographic profile

-100% -50% 0% 50% 100%

Black African Coloured Indian or Asian White Other

Black African Coloured Indian or Asian White Other

Male (38863) (3520) (269) (2054) (288)

Female 42621 3593 96 2240 107

(15)

12

The 2011 census divided the municipality into the following main areas:

Place Area (km2) Population Batlharo Ba Ga Motlhware 459.53 37,270

Ga Mohana 2.83 3,674

Gathlose 498.52 116

Kudumane 198.06 14,033

Kuruman Part 1 32.22 0

Kuruman Part 2 93.61 9,824

Mothibistad 2.93 4,626

Remainder of the municipality 3,197.71 849

(Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuruman)

Figure / Table 1.6: Population according to wards

(Source: Statistic South Africa: Census 2011)

(6000) (4000) (2000) 0 2000 4000 6000

Ward 1 Ward 2 Ward 3 Ward 4 Ward 5 Ward 6 Ward 7 Ward 8 Ward 9 Ward 10 Ward 11 Ward 12 Ward 13

(3021) (4369) (4821)

(2765) (1509) (4364)

(2719) (2684) (1803) (5332)

(3356) (4872)

(3378)

3100 4383

5175 3059 1783

4455 3100

3306 1981

5844 3577

5422 3473

Male Female

(16)

13

Figure / Table 1.7: Population according to wards and gender

(Source: Statistic South Africa: Census 2011)

Figure / Table 1.8: Number of persons and households

(Source: Statistic South Africa: Census 2001 and Community Survey 2007 and Census 2011)

Male Female

Black

African

Coloured Indian or Asian

White Other Black African

Coloured Indian or Asian

White Other

NC452: Ga- Segonyana

38863 3520 269 2054 288 42621 3593 96 2240 107

Ward 1 742 289 55 1864 72 737 250 34 2044 35

Ward 2 3821 386 26 123 14 3842 401 2 130 9

Ward 3 4727 34 13 1 46 5114 49 7 1 4

Ward 4 2731 6 19 1 8 3037 14 7 - 1

Ward 5 1489 11 5 1 3 1769 8 5 - -

Ward 6 4274 38 3 3 46 4413 22 2 4 14

Ward 7 2684 20 9 2 4 3078 20 - 1 1

Ward 8 2659 6 13 - 6 3284 13 1 3 5

Ward 9 1779 12 4 - 9 1965 11 - - 5

Ward 10 5195 80 22 4 30 5782 43 4 2 13

Ward 11 3220 67 23 38 7 3463 70 6 35 2

Ward 12 4793 52 14 2 10 5353 54 3 2 9

Ward 13 749 2519 63 14 33 784 2639 23 18 9

Number of people

Number of households

0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000

Census 2001 Community Survey 2007

Census 2011

Census 2001

Community Survey

2007 Census 2011

Number of people 70392 69791 93651

Number of households 17106 17163 28816

(17)

14

Figure / Table 1.9: Registered Voters per Ward

(Source: Municipal Demarcation Board)

The population density in the area is approximately 14 persons per square km, which is substantially less than the national average of 32.

Figure / Table 1.10: Persons per household

(Source: Statistic South Africa: Census 2011)

Ward 1

8% Ward 2 9% Ward 3

7%

Ward 4 7%

Ward 5 7%

Ward 6 Ward 7 8%

7%

Ward 8 9%

Ward 9 8%

Ward 10 8%

Ward 11 7%

Ward 12 8%

Ward 13

7% Ward Number of voters per ward

Ward 1 3291

Ward 2 3510

Ward 3 2748

Ward 4 2710

Ward 5 2820

Ward 6 3446

Ward 7 2910

Ward 8 3548

Ward 9 3225

Ward 10 3466

Ward 11 2848

Ward 12 3416

Ward 13 2920

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10+

Series1 7060 4438 3759 3791 2831 1924 1192 692 449 679

(18)

15

Figure / Table 1.11: Demographic information according to Census 2011

(Source: StatsSA, 2011 Census)

Population Age Structure Dependency Ration Sex Ration

<15 15-64 65% Per 100 (15-64)

2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 1996-2001 2001-2011

70392 93651 35.4 32.5 60.5 63.2 4.2 4.3 65.3 58.1 89.4 92.5 2.55 2.85

Population Growth (%

p.a) Males per 100 females

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 90000 100000

2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 1996- 2001

2001- 2011

<15 15-64 65% Per 100

(15-64)

Males per 100 females

Population Age Structure Dependency

Ration

Sex Ration Population Growth (%

p.a) Series1 70392 93651 35.4 32.5 60.5 63.2 4.2 4.3 65.3 58.1 89.4 92.5 2.55 2.85

Axis Title

Demographics

(19)

16 (Source: Statistic South Africa: Census 2001 and Community Survey 2007 and Census 2011)

Figure / Table 1.13: Statistics in terms of Labour and Education according to Census 2011

(Source: StatsSA, 2011 Census)

Employed 34%

Unemployed 21%

Not economical

ly active 45%

Community Survey 2007

15-34 ye ars

2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011

45.5 33.7 56.6 43.2 19.6 9.7 18 24 6 9.5

Une mployme nt Rate (official)

Une mployme nt Rate (official)

No Schooling Highe r Education Matric Education (age d 20+)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011

15-34 years No Schooling Higher

Education

Matric Unemployment

Rate (official)

Yourth Unemployment

Rate (official)

Education (aged 20+)

Labour and Education

Ga-Segonyana 45.5 33.7 56.6 43.2 19.6 9.7 18 24 6 9.5

Axis Title

Ga-Segonyana

Employed 24%

Unemployed 20%

Not economically

active 56%

Census 2001

Employment status Census 2001 Community Survey 2007 Census 2011

Employed 10195 14579 12487

Unemployed 8517 8758 3567

Not economically active 24098 18886 10762

Employed 47%

Unemployed 13%

Not economically active

40%

Census 2011

(20)

17

Figure / Table 1.14: Statistics in terms of Household Dynamics according to Census 2011

rce: StatsSA, 2011 Census)

(Source: StatsSA, 2011 Census)

1.3 Service Delivery Overview

Figure / Table 1.15: Basic Services Overview

(Source: StatsSA, 2011 Census)

2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011

17163 26816 4 3.5 51.7 42.7 72.5 81 81.6 65.7

Ave rage house hold size

Fe male he ade d house holds %

Formal dwe llings

%

% Housing owne d/ paying off House holds

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000

2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011 2001 2011

Households Average

household size

Female headed households %

Formal dwellings %

% Housing owned/ paying

off Household Dynamics

Ga-Segonyana 17163 26816 4 3.5 51.7 42.7 72.5 81 81.6 65.7

Ga-Segonyana

0 20 40 60 80 100

Acceptable standard of development:

Housing

Acceptable standard of development:

Refuse disposal

Acceptable standard of development:

Toilet facilities

Acceptable standard of development:

Electricity (Lighting)

Acceptable standard of development:

Water available according to RDP

standars 72.5

20.3

51.9

74.5

90.6 79.7

24.9

88.2 90.8 98.5

85

18

41

91 88

Percentage (%) Census 2001 Percentage (%) Community Survey 2007 Percentage (%) Census 2011

(21)

18

Basic services in the Municipality as reflected according to Stats South Africa between Census 2001, Community Survey in 2007 and Census 2011. It is very important to take into consideration the increase in terms of people and households in the area, which had a serious impact in terms of service delivery. The above lines represented above are reflected in the Table below:

Figure / Table 1.16: Basic Services Overview (2)

(Source: StatsSA, 2011 Census)

1.4 Financial Health Overview

Figure / Table 1.17: Financial Health Overview

GA-SEGONYANA MUNICIPALITY

STATEMENT OF COMPARISON OF BUDGET AND ACTUAL AMOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2013 Notes to the user:

(1) Approved Budget: The Final Budget approved by council and submitted to National Treasury.

(2) Final Budget: The Final Amended Budget used by the municipality, for which council approval was not obtained (i.e. adjustments/virements allowed without council approval).

(3) If the Approved Budget (normally the Adjustment Budget) is the same as the Final Budget, only column need to be used.

30 June 2013

Description

Original Budget Final

Virement

Final Actual

Unauthori sed

Variance Actual Outcome

Actual Outcome

Total

Adjustme

nts as % of as % of

Budget Adjustm

ents Budget Budget Outcome

Expenditu re

Final Budget

Original Budget

R R R R R R R R R R

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

Revenue from Non-exchange

Transactions

Property Rates

18,905,470

-

18,905,47 0

(379)

18,905,091

16,889,43 3

-

(2,015,658)

89.34

89.34 Property Rates - Penalties imposed and

collection charges

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.00

0.00

Fines

(2,142,110)

-

(2,142,110 )

4,404,936

2,262,826

4,814,028

-

2,551,202

212.74

0.00 Licences and Permits

7,651,760

-

7,651,760

(4,184,680)

3,467,080

3,418,722

-

(48,358)

98.61

44.68 Income for Agency Services

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.00

0.00 Government Grants and Subsidies

Received

70,296,329

-

70,296,32 9

37,894,019

108,190,34 8

152,369,8 38

-

44,179,490

140.83

216.75 Public Contributions and Donations

-

-

-

-

-

2,196,200

-

2,196,200

0.00

0.00

Revenue from Exchange Transactions

Service Charges

734,470

-

734,470

92,636,202

93,370,672

94,335,31 8

-

964,646

101.03

12,844.00 Rental of Facilities and Equipment

974,866

-

974,866

491,057

1,465,923

1,265,072

-

(200,851)

86.30

129.77

Performance Indicator: Basic Services Percentage (%)

Census 2001

Community Survey 2007

Census 2011

Acceptable standard of development: Housing 72.5 79.7 85

Acceptable standard of development: Refuse disposal 20.3 24.9 18

Acceptable standard of development: Toilet facilities 51.9 88.2 41

Acceptable standard of development: Electricity (Lighting) 74.5 90.8 91

Acceptable standard of development: Water available according to RDP

standards 90.6 98.5 88

Census 2001

Community Survey 2007

Census 2011

Number of people 70392 69791 93651

Number of households 17106 17163 28816

(22)

19

Interest Earned - External Investments

-

-

-

483,550

483,550

1,714,060

-

1,230,510

354.47

0.00 Interest Earned - Outstanding Debtors

2,077,370

-

2,077,370

(881,320)

1,196,050

636,884

-

(559,166)

53.25

30.66

Other Income

2,672,009

-

2,672,009

29,428,242

32,100,251

3,084,527

-

(29,015,72 5)

9.61

115.44 Profit on Sale of Land

-

-

-

-

-

1,047,709

-

1,047,709

0.00

0.00

Total Revenue

101,170,16 4

-

101,170,1 64

160,271,62 8

261,441,79 2

281,771,7 90

-

20,329,999

107.78

278.51

Expenditure

Employee Related Costs

23,866,278

-

23,866,27

8

34,553,778

58,420,056

58,726,87 9

306,823

306,823

100.53

246.07 Remuneration of Councillors

6,204,903

-

6,204,903

165,200

6,370,103

6,418,885

48,782

48,782

100.77

103.45

Depreciation and Amortisation

13,005,400

-

13,005,40

0

23,300

13,028,700

53,099,21 8

40,070,518

40,070,518

407.56

408.29 Impairment Losses

1,484,360

-

1,484,360

-

1,484,360

9,813,610

8,329,250

8,329,250

661.13

661.13

Repairs and Maintenance

14,009,660

-

14,009,66

0

8,665,684

22,675,344

21,069,35 0

-

(1,605,994)

92.92

150.39 Finance Costs

7,169,877

-

7,169,877

(33,047)

7,136,830

4,661,124

-

(2,475,706)

65.31

65.01

Bulk Purchases

49,401,335

-

49,401,33

5

4,027,625

53,428,960

53,340,09 4

-

(88,866)

99.83

107.97

General Expenses

(19,076,19

3)

-

(19,076,19

3)

120,615,09

8 101,538,90 5

68,599,64 8

-

(32,939,25 7)

67.56

0.00 Other Losses on Continued Operations

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.00

0.00 Loss on Disposal of Property, Plant and

Equipment

-

-

-

-

-

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

SuMMARY Of ACTIVITIES Of AuDIT COMMITTEE The following activities were carried out by the Audit Committee during the financial year ended 31 December 2012 in the discharge of its

1.6.7.5 Corporate Services, Human Resources, Health and Safety Committee The terms of reference of this committee are to advise and make recommendations to the Executive Committee on:

Publication of Annual Budget In accordance with Section 22 of the MFMA, the Municipal Manager shall ensure that immediately after the annual budget is tabled in the Council: 26.1 The

DIREC KEY P SECT NR RIS1 SECT NR MPAC1 NR MPAC3 CTORATE: OFFIC PERFORMANCE A ION: RISK MANAG Operational INDICATOR Number of risk management reports submitted the Risk

The required budget reform returns were not submitted to National Treasury in terms of the MFMA No 56 of 2003, S741... The required budget reform returns were not submitted to National

The administration of the council is good and on standard with the rest of the country, - however the lack of proper funding hamper the change management challenges, mSCOA requires;

Officials delegated in terms of Section 79 of the MFMA: - Assistant Director Expenditure - Chief Financial Officer - Deputy Chief Financial Officer - Director Expenditure - Assistant

Municipalities that did not not comply with Section 71 of the MFMA in Quarter 1, 2008/09... Grants and Subdsidies as per Division of Revenue Act