• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

A study to evaluate the suitability of strategic alignment in a changing external environment : a case study of Moreland Developments (Pty) Limited.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "A study to evaluate the suitability of strategic alignment in a changing external environment : a case study of Moreland Developments (Pty) Limited."

Copied!
115
0
0

Teks penuh

The background of this research will provide an understanding of the nature of the firm's dilemma as well as theoretical information relevant to this area of ​​study. The theoretical field of study will be used to develop a model derived from relevant literature focusing on corporate strategy.

Background of the Research

  • The Land Development Process
  • Moreland's strategy
  • The Impact of Changes in the External Environment
  • Examination of the Management Dilemma
  • The Theoretical Model

The first part of the model development will focus on an accurate assessment of an organization's internal and external environment. This partnership of an appropriate strategy with the company and external environmental conditions completes the development of the first part of the model.

Motivation for the research

The three types of evaluation criteria that will be used are suitability, which is a broad assessment of whether the strategy addresses the conditions under which the organization operates; acceptability, which relates to the expected performance results if the strategy were implemented and actually;. The second part of the model completes the framework for the development of the theoretical model. The model will then be used to assess and provide solutions to Moreland's profit margin dilution dilemma caused by changes outside the organization's control.

Value of the Study

Problem Statement

Objectives of the Study

The framework of the model is based on literature by Pearce and Robinson (2000) and Johnson and Scholes (1999). The theory establishes the context for the company's internal and external environments, which support the strategic direction of the organization.

Summary

THEORETICAL BASE

INTRODUCTION

How effective the company's existing strategy will be based on our analysis of emerging environmental conditions. The first step in developing a model is a detailed analysis of the company's internal and external environment.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE THEORETICAL MODEL

The second step is to examine the external environment using, primarily, Porter's Five Forces model. In long-term planning, the future is expected to be predictable through the extrapolation of historical growth.

Figure 2.1 Gap Analysis
Figure 2.1 Gap Analysis

THE INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT

  • SWOT Analysis

Organizational ability – skills, routines, management and leadership of an organization (organizational ability is the focus of this section). Second, the core competency should make a significant contribution to the perceived benefits of the end product for customers.

Figure 2.2 Porter
Figure 2.2 Porter's Value Chain

AN ANALYSIS OF THE EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT

  • The PEST Analysis (Political, Economic, Social and Technological)
  • The Industry's Dominant Forces

Market growth rate and position in business (early development, rapid growth and take-off, early maturity, maturity, saturation and stagnation, decline). The threat of entry determines the likelihood that new firms will enter an industry and compete away for value, either passing it on to buyers in the form of lower prices or driving it out by raising the costs of competition.

Figure 2.3 Porter
Figure 2.3 Porter's Five Forces Model

STRATEGIC OPTIONS BASED ON THE INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENTS

The firm that chooses this strategy is very committed to its current products and markets. Market development is chosen if the firm believes that existing products will be well received by new customer groups. However, if the firm has resources that exceed the requirements of a focused growth strategy, it should consider vertical integration.

The development of the model follows from the choice of a grand strategy, based on an accurate assessment of the company's internal and external environment.

Figure 2.5 Strategic Options - Internal or External Direction
Figure 2.5 Strategic Options - Internal or External Direction

TESTING OF SUITABILITY, ACCEPTABILITY AND FEASIBILITY

  • ANALYSING SUITABILITY
  • ANALYSING ACCEPTABILITY
  • ANALYSING FEASIBILITY

The assessment of the returns likely to accrue from specific options is an important measure of an option's acceptability. The company's net present value (NPV) is then calculated by adding all discounted annual cash flows (after taxes) over the expected life of the project. The likely return of a particular strategy is an important measure of the acceptability of that strategy.

The technique allows each of the important assumptions underlying a given strategy to be questioned and changed.

Table 2.1 Life Cycle Analysis
Table 2.1 Life Cycle Analysis

SUMMARY

The requirements of alternative future strategies should be outlined, indicating the key resources and competencies for each strategy. A scoring system can be used to compare various strategic options with the current resources and competencies of the organization to assess two aspects: first, the extent to which the current resources and competencies will have to change in order to achieve or maintain the threshold requirements for. each strategy, and second, the unique resources and core competencies needed to maintain competitive advantage. The danger is that resource deployment analysis will simply lead organizations to choose strategies that best fit the configuration of their current resources and competencies.

It must be remembered that the real benefit of such an analysis is identifying those necessary changes in resources and competencies that any strategy entails, and analyzing whether those changes are feasible given the scale, quality of resources, or time frame of the change. .

Figure 2.8 Theoretical Model
Figure 2.8 Theoretical Model

CASE STUDY OF MORELAND DEVELOPMENTS (pTY) LTD

INTRODUCTION

COMPANY BACKGROUND

  • The Structure of the Company The Portfolios of the Company
  • Internal Business Processes
  • Competitor Analysis

Expansion of the GLASS project (Group land and building register) to the next phase (including internal rollout). Moreland has largely maximized its share of the local market (Durban) and the company has realized that growth in Durban. The recent increase in the value of the Rand has had a negative impact on the group's result.

The development of the La Lucia Ridge Office Estate and the Umhlanga Ridge Town Center has led to a demand for residential property around these catalyst projects.

Figure 3.2 Land Management Strategy
Figure 3.2 Land Management Strategy

MORELAND'S FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

  • Turnover
  • Capital Employed

Operating profit levels are under pressure due to property taxes and rising land maintenance costs. In the commercial portfolio, particularly La Lucia Ridge Office Estate and Umhlanga Ridge New Town Centre, the bulk of the infrastructure development took place in 2001, as evidenced by the negative cash flow. The increase in the resort's cash flow in 2002 is attributed to the large sales made in Zimbali as well as the income from the Sibaya casino.

The increase in development expenditure in the residential portfolio is in line with addressing current demand for housing in the La Lucia, Umhlanga and Mount Edgecombe triangle.

Table 3.2 Financial Analysis - Operating and Attributable Profit
Table 3.2 Financial Analysis - Operating and Attributable Profit

SUMMARY

In light of sub-par margins caused primarily by an increase in cost of sales, Moreland's current focus (or niche market) strategy based on differentiation appears to be inappropriate. The next chapter will examine the strategic options available to the company in light of environmental changes.

INTRODUCTION

Limit the company's risk exposure from environmental forces that have resulted in an increase in cost of sales. Environmental forces mainly include high home ownership rates, reduced Local Authority contributions and the cyclical nature of interest rates. The current strategy exposes the company to changes in the environment that are essentially beyond Moreland's control.

Do nothing - Changes in the environment are expected to continue as observed in the ROCE trend.

INTERNAL ASSESSMENT .1 SWOT Analysis

  • Porter's Value Chain

Analysis of the company's existing strengths shows that most remain strengths and will help Moreland respond to environmental changes. In applying the resource-based view to examining Moreland's internal strengths, a systematic assessment of internal resources is made in the context of the company's competitive environment. The key resources listed above are developed and controlled by Moreland and the profits generated by these core competencies in the role of value creation accrue to the company.

Redirecting resources within the firm will not circumvent the external threats the company faces, ie.

Figure 4.2 Strategic Options - Internal Assessment (Evaluation)
Figure 4.2 Strategic Options - Internal Assessment (Evaluation)

THE EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT .1 PEST ANALYSIS

  • THE INDUSTRY'S DOMINANT FORCES (a) Market size
  • PORTER'S FIVE FORCES MODEL

Moreland's strategic access to prime coastal land has created a significant barrier to competitors, particularly in the residential and resort portfolios. These triggers started new projects for Moreland in the form of the expansion of Zimbali Coastal Resort as well as the Durban Point development project. In general, the position of each of the portfolios in the business cycle changes from year to year according to the driving force of the particular market.

The number of buyers is portfolio specific, with typically a larger number in the homes compared to the other portfolios.

Figure 4.5 porter
Figure 4.5 porter's Five Forces Model (Evaluation)

DEDUCTION OF APPROPRIATE STRATEGIES

This option is therefore not appropriate given the scale of threats that are beyond the company's control and are likely to continue in the long term. A more likely and viable option is forward vertical integration where Moreland buys a real estate development company closer to the end customer. This means that the company has to pay for the design, installation and maintenance of internal infrastructure that would normally be provided by the local authority.

Therefore, it appears that the acquisition of an unrelated company would only achieve a short-term profit opportunity and would not provide the company with a long-term sustainable advantage.

Figure 4.6 Strategic Options - Internal and External Assessment (Evaluation)
Figure 4.6 Strategic Options - Internal and External Assessment (Evaluation)

TESTING OF SUITABILITY, ACCEPTABILITY AND FEASABILITY This IS a broad assessment of whether the strategy of concentric diversification

  • SUITABILITY (a) Suitability
  • ANALYSING ACCEPTABILITY

This concentric diversification strategy adequacy test measures the effect of the strategy on the balance of Moreland's portfolios. This analysis shows the potential impact of the concentric diversification strategy on a number of Moreland's performance parameters. This test of the concentric diversification strategy concerns the expected performance outcomes, such as risk and return, if Moreland adopts the strategy.

This final test of the concentric diversification strategy addresses the question of whether Moreland has the resources and skills to execute the strategy.

Table 4.4 Positioning (Test ofSuitability)
Table 4.4 Positioning (Test ofSuitability)

SUMMARY

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

  • INTRODUCTION
  • SHORT-TERM OBJECTIVES
  • SHORT TO MEDIUM TERM OBJECTIVES
  • CONCLUSION

Moreland's internal value chain should be configured accordingly to create synergies in sales, marketing, project management and transfer. The rationale for this approach is similar to that of a joint venture with a real estate development company, in that the high sales costs for serviced land could be spread across a fully developed site, as opposed to the status quo of the high maintenance costs of land. included in the sale of land only, resulting in a lower profit margin. Despite the obvious benefits of the focused differentiated strategy that Moreland is currently pursuing, the limitations of such a strategy have exposed the company's lack of agility in dealing with changes in the business environment.

A company with a broad portfolio can be more resilient in the face of a rapidly changing external environment because of its operational agility to respond to change.

Table 5.1 Joint Venture Contribution
Table 5.1 Joint Venture Contribution

Gambar

Figure 2.1 Gap Analysis
Figure 2.2 Porter's Value Chain
Figure 2.3 Porter's Five Forces Model
Figure 2.4 Strategic Options - Internal Assessment
+7

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

ffiffigffifqmiEs6& rBq lE lFiE@ffi{Effim!!ffiTrF4mm o e:6rn6 qfqffiem{dsfrffi qmftir@@$Fq 4h lnfft aiii ri{i... "lm.tut fiiqffi mqPrsFrnwffi