• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

The evolution of orbital-angular-momentum entanglement of photons in turbulent air.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "The evolution of orbital-angular-momentum entanglement of photons in turbulent air."

Copied!
149
0
0

Teks penuh

We will present a numerical study of the evolution of OAM entanglement between two qubits propagating in turbulence. Our experimental study of the evolution of OAM entanglement between two qubits is presented in Chapter 4.

Introduction

The orbital angular momentum of light

Angular momentum in paraxial optics

The paraxial approach assumes that the propagation distance of an optical wave is much greater than the transverse dispersion of the wave [86]. Now if we assume that the transverse dispersion of the wave is smaller than the propagation distance, the diffraction effects on the optical wave U(x, y, z) change slowly with the propagation distance and the transverse variations.

Optical beam carrying OAM

For these values ​​of p and ℓ, the intensity profile of the beam is a single bright ring that increases in diameter with ℓ. The radial profile of the beam can be scaled by choosing different values ​​of kr as shown in fig.

Figure 2.1 shows the intensity profile and the phase cross section of the LG mode at a given z for ℓ = 1, 2 and 3 when the radial index p = 0
Figure 2.1 shows the intensity profile and the phase cross section of the LG mode at a given z for ℓ = 1, 2 and 3 when the radial index p = 0

Generation of light beam with OAM

A more practical way to generate light with OAM is to use diffraction in a pitchfork or fork-shaped hologram [16–18]. LG beams today are easily generated using “computer-generated holograms” obtained by adding a diffrac-.

Figure 2.4: Schematic image of a spiral phase plate.
Figure 2.4: Schematic image of a spiral phase plate.

Quantum entanglement

Spontaneous parametric down-conversion

The process is much more efficient if the wave vectors of the three photons satisfy the momentum conservation condition it specifies. 2.39). Since then, SPDC has been the preferred method of generating complex photons due to the relative simplicity of the process.

Figure 2.6: Spontaneous parametric down conversion. (a) the non-linear crystal – BBO (Beta Barium Borate) – splits the pump photon into two photons (signal and idler)
Figure 2.6: Spontaneous parametric down conversion. (a) the non-linear crystal – BBO (Beta Barium Borate) – splits the pump photon into two photons (signal and idler)

OAM and multidimensional entanglement

The phase-matching condition appears as a sync function in the two-photon state. Thus, we can write the state of two photons in the LG base |ℓ, p⟩ as 2.46).

Quantum state tomography

The density matrix ρ of a qubit's state can be written in terms of the matrices above as The quantity ⟨un|ρ|un⟩ can be approximated by measuring the coincidence theorems corresponding to the projection operator |un⟩⟨un| and normalizing the results by dividing by the total count rate (corresponding to tr{σ0ρ}), that is. un|ρ|un⟩= count rate for projective measurement. The identity operator can be written as 2.57) Therefore one can estimate tr{σnρ} using the coincidence count rates by. tr{σnρ}= counting rate forun−counting rate forvn. count rate forun+ count rate forvn. 2.52 can be generalized to the case where one has 2 qubits and to the case of qudits. 2.59) can be estimated by measuring observables that are products of Pauli matrices.

This quantity can be estimated from the coincidence count rate as was done in the case of a qubit above. count rate forunum−count rate vvnum−count rate forunvm+ count rate for vnvm count rate forunum+ count rate vvnum+ count rate forunvm+ count rate vnvm. 2.62).

Optical wave in atmospheric turbulence

  • Statistical description of optical turbulence
  • Power spectra for refractive-index fluctuations
  • Simulating atmospheric turbulence: the split-step method
  • Previous theoretical studies
  • The single phase screen approximation
  • The IPE

We can set up an experiment to obtain the power spectrum of the refractive index fluctuation. In the Kolmogorov theory, these properties are given by the power spectral density of the refractive index fluctuation [Eq. The latter is inversely proportional to the spatial extent of the refractive index fluctuation (which is usually given by the external turbulence scale).

The density matrix representing the state of the two photons can be written in the OAM basis as.

Figure 2.7: The energy cascade theory of turbulence.
Figure 2.7: The energy cascade theory of turbulence.

Summary

Although some work has been done in the past on the effect of atmospheric turbulence on entangled OAMs, the authors assumed that the overall effect of turbulence on the propagation path can be modeled by a single phase distortion in the beam [ 41 ]. In the first case, we use the single-phase screen approximation, that is, we model the turbulent atmosphere with a single-phase screen based on the Kolmogorov turbulence theory. We then compare our results with those obtained by Smith and Raymer [84] where the single-phase screen approximation was used to obtain an analytical expression for the evolution of OAM entanglement in turbulence.

Numerical results are presented in Section 3.3, where we first discuss the case where the turbulent atmosphere is modeled by a single-phase screen (3.3.1) followed by our discussion of the case where we use the multi-phase screen to simulate turbulence (3.3. 2 ).

Numerical simulation

  • Generating random phase screen
  • Accuracy of the phase screens
  • Decoherence process
  • Validity of the simulation

The first test we perform is the calculation of the structure function of the phase screens. Consequently, the calculated phase screen more accurately represents the statistics of the turbulent atmosphere. As we add the sub-harmonics, the structure function of the phase screens approaches the analytical expression.

To get a better model of the turbulent atmosphere, we will use a multi-phase screen approach.

Figure 3.1: A graphical representation of a random phase screen. The phase value is given by the grey scale.
Figure 3.1: A graphical representation of a random phase screen. The phase value is given by the grey scale.

Results

OAM entanglement through turbulence simulated by a single phase

The fact that concurrency survives longer for higher values ​​of |ℓ|- suggests that the rate of entanglement decay will occur around a different point for larger values ​​of ℓ: the rate at which decoherence occurs depends on the value of ℓ. To find that ℓ dependence, we use S&R theory to find the values ​​of ω0/r0 where the concurrency is equal to 0.5 for the various |ℓ|-values ​​considered. For example, it was observed in the weak fluctuation regime that the concurrency lasts longer for higher values ​​of|ℓ|, here we see that the concurrency drops to zero around the same value of w0/r0.

This suggests that there is a value of K beyond which the evolution of simultaneity depends only on w0/r0.

Figure 3.12: The concurrence plotted against the scintillation strength (w 0 /r 0 ) when one of the two photons propagates in turbulence
Figure 3.12: The concurrence plotted against the scintillation strength (w 0 /r 0 ) when one of the two photons propagates in turbulence

Conclusion

Most theoretical work is based on the Paterson model (discussed in section 2.4.5), which uses the single-phase screen approach, where the overall effect of the turbulent medium on a propagating jet is assumed to be only a phase distortion [ 41]. 82] where a 1 km thick turbulent medium was simulated in the laboratory with two phase screens and the crosstalk in the communication channels was reduced by means of an adaptive correction of the turbulence, as well as by optimization. However, none of the experimental studies directly addressed the decay of OAM entanglement due to atmospheric turbulence.

This is an experimental verification of the theoretical study carried out by Smith and Raymer (S&R).

Experimental procedure

The SLMs are imaged through lenses L3 (f3 = 500 mm) and L4 (f4 = 2 mm) to the input of the single-mode fibers, where only the fundamental Gaussian mode is coupled into the fibers. Bandpass filters (IF2) with width 10 nm and centered on 710 nm are placed in front of the fibers to ensure that the photons detected have the desired wavelength. The atmospheric turbulence is simulated by adding random phase fluctuations [as given by Eq. 2.106)] to the phase function of one of the SLMs in the case when only one of the photons propagates through turbulence, and to the phase functions of both SLMs in the case when both photons propagate through turbulence.

These negative eigenvalues ​​are removed by adding the absolute value of the most negative eigenvalue to the diagonal elements of the reconstructed density matrix and re-normalizing the results.

Figure 4.1: Experimental setup used to detect the OAM eigenstate after SPDC. The plane of the crystal is relayed imaged onto two separate SLMs using lenses, L 1 and L 2 (f 1 = 200 mm and f 2 = 400 mm), where the LG modes are selected
Figure 4.1: Experimental setup used to detect the OAM eigenstate after SPDC. The plane of the crystal is relayed imaged onto two separate SLMs using lenses, L 1 and L 2 (f 1 = 200 mm and f 2 = 400 mm), where the LG modes are selected

Results and discussion

Single photon case

It can also be observed that both the S&R theory and the numerical results indicate that the coincidence lasts longer for higher values ​​of |ℓ|. The experimental results were normalized by dividing the agreement values ​​by the initial value obtained for each |ℓ|. The IPE also predicts that the coincidence will last longer at higher |ℓ| values, as shown in Figure 2.

4.6(b), in addition, predicts that the concurrency decays at a much slower rate and deviates completely from the other curves when |ℓ| > 1.

Figure 4.6: The concurrence plotted against the scintillation strength (w 0 /r 0 ) when only one photon is propagated through turbulence for |ℓ| = 1, 3, 5 and 7
Figure 4.6: The concurrence plotted against the scintillation strength (w 0 /r 0 ) when only one photon is propagated through turbulence for |ℓ| = 1, 3, 5 and 7

Two-photon case

The reason for this is that the IPE underestimates the coupling of different base elements that are far apart. However, there is no clear distinction between the points corresponding to |ℓ| not = 3.5 and 7 (the convergence is about 0.25 at ω0/r0 = 4 for all these cases). Our experimental results support the fact that the matching lasts longer for higher|ℓ|-values ​​[Fig.

As stated in the previous section, it becomes more difficult to accurately measure the mode for higher values ​​of |ℓ|.

Figure 4.7: The concurrence plotted against the scintillation strength (w 0 /r 0 ) when both photons are propagated through turbulence
Figure 4.7: The concurrence plotted against the scintillation strength (w 0 /r 0 ) when both photons are propagated through turbulence

Truncation problem in the IPE

Conclusions

However, the effects of turbulence on the OAM entanglement between two systems of dimensions higher than two have received little attention. In this chapter, the effects of atmospheric turbulence on the OAM entanglement between two qutrits (quantum state described by a three-dimensional Hilbert space) are investigated theoretically and experimentally. This chapter is organized as follows: The experimental procedure is presented in section 5.2, followed by the numerical procedure in section 5.3.

We introduce an experiment where down-converted photons are simulated with back-projected light in section 5.5 and some conclusions are provided in section 5.6.

Experimental procedure

For bipartite two-dimensional states (qubits), the entanglement is the lower bound for the square of the simultaneity. The BG states can thus be used as a basis for representing the quantum state of the two photons after SPDC. In the BG basis, one can write the state of the two photons produced by the SPDC as [72].

The flatness of the OAM spectrum plays an important role in the reconstruction of the density matrix representing the state of the two photons produced by SPDC.

Figure 5.1: The tangle and the concurrence squared plotted against the scintillation strength (w 0 /r 0 )
Figure 5.1: The tangle and the concurrence squared plotted against the scintillation strength (w 0 /r 0 )

Numerical procedure

Results and discussion

The evolution of the entanglement between two qubits is qualitatively similar to the evolution of entanglement between two qubits initially in a Bell state presented in the previous chapters. However, unlike what was observed in the qubit case, the experimental curves of the entanglement corresponding to different |ℓ| values ​​appear to be superimposed [Fig. The numerical results also show that the curves of the entanglement corresponding to |ℓ|= 3 and 5 overlap, but the entanglement decays slightly faster when |ℓ|= 1.

5.5 (a) (except for the error bars) where we plot the numerical results for the evolution of the entanglement between the two qutris on the same graph.

Figure 5.5: Numerical (a) and experimental (b) results of the evolution of the tangle between two qutrits against the scintillation strength for | ℓ | = 1, 3 and 5.
Figure 5.5: Numerical (a) and experimental (b) results of the evolution of the tangle between two qutrits against the scintillation strength for | ℓ | = 1, 3 and 5.

Simulating down-converted photons with back-projected light

One of the APDs is replaced by a diode laser at a wavelength of 710 nm and a BBO crystal with a mirror. We perform whole-state tomography to reconstruct the density matrix describing the state of the two qutrites. It can be seen from the density matrix plots that the back-projection experiment simulates the down-conversion experiment well.

To further compare the two experiments, we study the evolution of the OAM. a): Theoretical (b): Down conversion (c): Back projection.

Figure 5.6: (a) Simplified diagram of the experimental setup used to detect the OAM eigenstates after SPDC.(b) Diagram of the setup used to simulate the  down-conversion experiment with back projected classical light
Figure 5.6: (a) Simplified diagram of the experimental setup used to detect the OAM eigenstates after SPDC.(b) Diagram of the setup used to simulate the down-conversion experiment with back projected classical light

Conclusions

Rubinsztein-Dunlop, “Direct observation of angular momentum transfer of absorbing particles by a laser beam with a phase singularity,” Phys. Paterson, “Atmospheric turbulence and orbital angular momentum of single photons for optical communication,” Phys. Roux, “The infinitesimal propagation equation for the decoherence of an entangled orbital-angular-momentum biphoton state in atmospheric turbulence,” Phys.

Padgett, “Intrinsic and extrinsic nature of the orbital angular momentum of a light ray,” Phys.

Gambar

Figure 2.1: Cross section of the intensity profile and phase of a LG beam with radial index p = 0
Figure 2.3: The intensity profile and phase of a BG beam for different values of the radial parameter k r when ℓ = 1.
Figure 2.9: Illustration of the split-step method. The turbulent atmosphere is modelled by a series of consecutive phase screens separated by a distance ∆z
Figure 3.1: A graphical representation of a random phase screen. The phase value is given by the grey scale.
+7

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

In previous work, we have undertaken a series of investigations of the historical evolution of racial gaps in home ownership rates and in the value of owner-occupied housing based on