• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

PDF 04Notice of Motion Durban High Court

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "PDF 04Notice of Motion Durban High Court"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA DURBAN AND COAST LOCAL DIVISION

Case Number:

In the matter between:

ELIZABETH GUMEDE (born SHANGE) Applicant

and

PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

First Respondent

MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND CONSTITUTIONAL

DEVELOPMENT Second Respondent

PREMIER OF KWAZULU-NATAL Third Respondent

KWAZULU-NATAL MEC FOR TRADITIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS

Fourth Respondent

AMOS GUMEDE Fifth Respondent

NOTICE OF MOTION

(2)

Page 2

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the applicant in this matter intends applying to the above Honourable Court for an order in the following terms:

1. declaring that section 7(1) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act No. 120 of 1998 (“the Recognition Act”) is inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid;

2. declaring that the inclusion of the words “entered into after the commencement of this Act” in section 7(2) of the Recognition Act is inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid;

3. declaring that the inclusion of the words “entered into after the commencement of this Act” in section 7(5) of the Recognition Act is inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid;

4. declaring that section 20 of the KwaZulu Act on the Code of Zulu Law No. 16 of 1985 is inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid;

5. declaring that section 20 of the Natal Code of KwaZulu Law Proclamation R151 of 1987 is inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid;

(3)

Page 3

6. declaring section 22 of the Natal Code of KwaZulu Law Proclamation R151 of 1987 is inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid.

7. declaring that a customary marriage in which a spouse is not a partner in any other existing customary marriage, produces the legal consequences of a marriage in community of property.

8. declaring that a spouse in a customary marriage is entitled, on divorce, to claim maintenance from the other spouse.

9. ordering those respondents who oppose this application to pay the costs, jointly and severally, the one paying, the other to be absolved

10. referring this order to the Constitutional Court for confirmation

TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT if you intend opposing this application you are required:

(a) to notify the applicant’s attorney in writing on or before the day of April 2006; and further you are required to appoint in such

notification an address referred to in Rule 6(5)(b) at which you will accept notice and service of all documents in these proceedings;

and

(4)

Page 4

(b) within fourteen (14) days after the service of this notice upon you, to file your answering affidavit, if any.

TAKE NOTICE FURTHER THAT the affidavit of the applicant, annexed hereto, will be used in support hereof.

TAKE NOTICE FURTHER THAT the applicant has appointed the Legal Resources Centre, 71 Diakonia Centre, 20 St Andrews Street, Durban as the address at which she will accept notice and service of all documents in these proceedings.

If no such notice of intention to oppose be given, the application will be

made on the day of 2006 at 9:30am.

DATED at DURBAN on this 10th day of March 2006.

____________________________

Attorney for Applicant

LEGAL RESOURCES CENTRE Applicant’s Attorney

71 Diakonia Centre 20 St Andrews Street DURBAN

Ref: Ms S Samuel Tel: 3017572

(5)

Page 5

TO: The Registrar of the High Court

Masonic Grove

DURBAN

AND TO: PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

First Respondent

C/O The State Attorney

Smith Street

DURBAN

AND TO: MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND

CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT Fourth Respondent

C/O The State Attorney

Smith Street

DURBAN

AND TO: PREMIER OF KWAZULU-NATAL

Third Respondent

C/O The State Attorney

Smith Street

DURBAN

AND TO: KWAZULU-NATAL MEC FOR TRADITIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS Fourth Respondent

C/O The State Attorney

Smith Street

DURBAN

AND TO: AMOS GUMEDE

Fifth Respondent

Adams Mission

KWAZULU-NATAL

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA President of the Republic of South Africa and another v Hugo Case CCT 11/96 Decided on 18 April 1997 Media Summary The following

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa MEDIA SUMMARY – JUDGMENT DELIVERED IN SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL From: The Registrar, Supreme Court of Appeal Date: … November 2005 Status:

SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA MEDIA STATEMENT – REGISTRAR OF PENSION FUNDS & ANOTHER v BRIAN ANGUS NO & OTHERS FROM: The Registrar, Supreme Court of Appeal Date: 30

“Because of the acceptance of the second respondent’s claim by the first respondent, the former has now, in terms of the Companies Act, acquired the right to be present at the enquiry,

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa MEDIA SUMMARY – JUDGMENT DELIVERED IN SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL From: The Registrar, Supreme Court of Appeal Date: 29 May 2007 Status:

Case CCT 84/2012 In the matter between: JUSTICE MPONDOMBINI SIGCAU Applicant and PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA First Respondent THE COMMISSION ON TRADITIONAL

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa MEDIA SUMMARY – JUDGMENT DELIVERED IN SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL From: The Registrar, Supreme Court of Appeal Date: 1 June 2005 Status:

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa MEDIA SUMMARY – JUDGMENT DELIVERED IN SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL From: The Registrar, Supreme Court of Appeal Date: 21 September 2007 Status: