• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Comparison of Responses to the Tsunami and the Airport Closure

Dalam dokumen Practice, Theory and Issues (Halaman 114-118)

Responding to Crises in Thailand: A Governance Analysis 99

network of offi ces are available online on a real-time basis, serving as an early detection and early warning mechanism that alerts TAT to potential problems which TAT and the Thai tourism industry need to address jointly and resolve. In the turbulent conditions of 2008–2009, TAT’s network of offi ces worldwide con-ducted surveys which revealed that the downturn in tourism resulted from a number of factors: the impact of the global economic slowdown, the political instability leading up to the airport closure and the subsequent protests in April 2009, and H1N1 A. TAT noted that:

The sensitivity varies from market to market. The survey fi ndings revealed that 6 out of 21 key source markets for visitor arrivals to Thailand – or 28 per cent – considered Infl uenza A (H1N1) to be the key factor in the decision not to travel to Thailand. While 17 out of the 21 markets – or 81 per cent – indicated that the political unrest and political instability that subsequently led to the airport closure and Songkran protest in April 2009 was the most important contributor to the decline in outbound travel to Thailand.

(Svetasreni, 2009)

Comparison of Responses to the Tsunami and the Airport

100 K. Campiranon et al.

Conclusion

This chapter has provided an overview of several crises which have impacted severely on Thailand’s tourism sector and has analysed the Thai government’s responses to two of them, the tsunami and the airport closure. The analysis has demonstrated the need for governments to take an increasingly proactive and structured stance towards any future crisis events. Safety in a destination, and the perception that the destination is safe to visit, is a prerequisite for a successful tourism industry. But, this chapter has also shown that the problems resulting from the scale, intensity and rapidity of events such as the tsunami and the airport closure are too severe and widespread for the tourism industry to resolve on its own. Instead, it must rely on the resources and skill of the government and its various agencies, for which tourism is seldom a priority during a crisis. This indicates that only a government has the power resources, skill and command ability to deal effectively with the immediate problems and to restructure devastated areas and infrastructure following a major crisis such as the tsunami.

As discussed in the introduction to this chapter, governance refers to the processes by which decisions are made (Graham et al., 2003) and, therefore, the ways in which decision-making power is organized and used in crises such as those discussed here. What emerges from this discussion of the differences between the tsunami and the airport closure cases is a clear difference in stake-holder cohesion due to political confl ict, with consequent impacts. In the airport crisis, the tourism sector became a point of leverage ‘used’ to further the ends of political opponents. The approach of targeting tourism directly to achieve politi-cal ambitions (as distinct from politipoliti-cal crises having an indirect effect) has been seen in other countries (Richter and Waugh, 1986; Aziz, 1995).

Thus, while in the tsunami crisis there was exercise of power by key tourism actors for the benefi t of the tourism sector, in the airport case, the non-tourism actors were exercising their power to the detriment of non-tourism. Crucially, tourism stakeholders were able to exercise little power, as the scale of both crises was too large and complex for the tourism industry to resolve.

Further research is required to understand the ways in which government policy and action by key actors can determine the success or even the survival of a tourism sector following the disruption resulting from a major crisis. In particu-lar, the linkages between political organizations, government agencies and central and regional or sector organizations merit more study. Irrespective of the reasons for civil unrest, potential tourists and tourism industry investors seek a stable political environment and this is beyond the capability of the tourism sector to guarantee.

References

Australian Government (2010) Travel advice: Thailand. Australian Government (www.

smartraveller.gov.au/zw-cgi/view/Advice/Thailand, accessed 4 April 2010).

Aziz, H. (1995) Understanding attacks on tourists in Egypt. Tourism Management 6(2), 91–95.

Responding to Crises in Thailand: A Governance Analysis 101

Bangkok Post (2008) Second airport closed. Bangkok Post (www.bangkokpost.com/

topstories/topstories.php?id=132330, accessed 10 January 2010).

Bangkok Post (2009) Timeline: How the red-shirt protest developed and ended. Bangkok Post (www.bangkokpost.com/news/local/140563/red-shirt-revolution, accessed 12 January 2010).

Baral, A., Baral, S. and Morgan, N. (2004) Marketing Nepal in an uncertain climate:

confronting perceptions of risk and insecurity. Journal of Vacation Marketing 10(2), 186–193.

Barta, P. (2008) Thai protests heighten crisis. The Wall Street Journal (online.wsj.com/

article/SB122762440088656477.html?mod=googlenews_wsj, accessed 6 July 2009).

Beirman, D. (2002) Marketing of tourism destinations during a prolonged crisis: Israel and the Middle East. Journal of Vacation Marketing 8(2), 167–177.

Campiranon, K. (2009) Critical success factors of crisis management in tourism: a case study of political crisis in Thailand. MSc thesis, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok.

Campiranon, K. and Arcodia, C. (2007) Market segmentation in time of crisis: a case study of the MICE sector in Thailand. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing 23 (2–4), 151–161.

CNN (2008) Explainer: Thailand’s political crisis. CNN (edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/

asiapcf/11/26/thailand.crisis.explainer/index.html#cnnSTCText, accessed 3 December 2008).

Dawson, K. (2008) Bangkok airport back in operation, but economic pain may linger.

VOA News (www.voanews.com/english/2008-12-04-voa8.cfm, accessed 2 July 2009).

EIU ViewsWire (2003) Thailand industry: tourism worries. EIU ViewsWire (proquest.umi.

com/pqdlink?did=664584581&sid=4&Fmt=3&clientId=20806&RQT=309&VNa me=PQD, accessed 20 April 2005).

Erkus-Ozturk, H. and Eraydin, A. (2010) Environmental governance for sustainable tourism development: collaborative networks and organisation building in the Antalya tourism region. Tourism Management 31(1), 113–124.

Graham, J., Amos, B. and Plumptre, T. (2003) Principles for Good Governance in the 21st Century. Policy Brief No. 15, Institute on Governance, Ottawa.

Hall, C. (2003) Politics and place: an analysis of power in tourism communities. In: Singh, S., Timothy, D. and Dowling, R. (eds) Tourism in Destination Communities. CAB Interna-tional, Wallingford, UK, pp. 99–113.

Henderson, J. (2006) Managing Tourism Crises: Causes, Consequences and Manage-ment. Butterworth-Heinemann, New York.

Hitchcock, M. (2001) Tourism and total crisis in Indonesia: the case of Bali. Asia Pacifi c Business Review 8(2), 101–120.

Kaur, K. (2008) Bangkok airport mess spilling into Changi. The Straits Times (travel.

asiaone.com/print/Travel/News/Story/A1Story20081210-106826.html, accessed 16 December 2008).

Kontogeorgopoulos, N. (1999) Sustainable tourism or sustainable development? Finan-cial crisis, ecotourism and the Amazing Thailand Campaign. Current Issues in Tourism 2(4), 316–332.

Lepp, A. and Gibson, H. (2003) Tourist roles, perceived risk and international tourism.

Annals of Tourism Research 30(3), 606–624.

Lopez, L. and Larkin, J. (2004) Thailand’s relief effort stands out; Asian nation moves fast to give aid after tsunami with minimal foreign help. Wall Street Journal, p. A.7.

Muqbal, I. (2010) Travel Impact Newswire. 31 March, Bangkok.

Palmer, A. (1998) Evaluating the governance style of marketing groups. Annals of Tourism Research 25, 185–201.

102 K. Campiranon et al.

Pandey, R. (2008) Is Thailand tourism terrifi c no longer? Marketing-Interactive (www.

marketing-interactive.com/news/8901, accessed 28 February 2010).

Plummer, R. and Fennell, D. (2009) Managing protected areas for sustainable tourism:

prospects for adaptive co-management. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 17(2), 149–168.

Richter, L. and Waugh, W.L. Jr (1986) Terrorism and tourism as logical companions.

Tourism Management 7(4), 230–238.

Ritchie, B. (2008) Tourism disaster planning and management: from response and recov-ery to reduction and readiness. Current Issues in Tourism 11(4), 315–348.

Rogers, T. (2003) Conferences and Conventions: A Global Industry. Butterworth- Heinemann, Oxford, UK.

Svetasreni, S. (2009) Jata World Tourism Congress 2009, Symposium B: Tourism and Risk Management ‘Tourism management in a critical period’ (18 September 2009).

The Nation (2008a) A brief history of modern Thai politics. The Nation (www.nationmul timedia.com/2007/07/01/politics/politics_30038672.php, accessed 16 December 2008).

The Nation (2008b) THAI faces daily loss of Bt500 million from closure of airport. The Nation (www.nationmultimedia.com/option/print.php?newsid=30089507, accessed 27 December 2008).

TNA (2009) PM: Thailand may invoke internal security law during ASEAN summit (www.

gemopolis.com/news/thailandnews/news_detail.php?ID=1764, accessed 10 February 2010).

Tourism Authority of Thailand [TAT] (2005) Tsunami waves triggered by Southeast Asian earthquake hits Thailand’s Andaman Coast: TAT offi ces on high alert ready to provide emergency assistance to tourists. Tourism Authority of Thailand (tatnews.

org/crisis/2381.asp, accessed 7 January 2005).

Tourism Authority of Thailand [TAT] (2009) Tourist statistics of Thailand. Tourism Author-ity of Thailand (www2.tat.or.th/stat/web/static_index.php, accessed 12 June 2009).

Travel Blackboard (2008) Cost of Bangkok airport closures estimated at 540 million Baht.

Travel Blackboard Asia (www.etravelblackboardasia.com/article.asp?id=57966&

nav=109, accessed 16 December 2008).

Vogt, M. and Wittayakorn, C. (1998) Determinants of the demand for Thailand’s exports of tourism. Applied Economics 30(6), 711–715.

Watson, P. (2008) Thailand protesters shut down Bangkok airport. Los Angeles Times (www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-fg-thailand26-2008nov26,0,18587.

story, accessed 12 June 2009).

Wire News (2008) Thai political unrest: violent protests force Bangkok airport to close. LA Times–Washington Post Service, 26 November.

© CAB International 2011. Tourist Destination Governance: Practice, Theory and Issues

(eds E. Laws et al.) 103

Introduction

The destination of concern in this chapter is Vava’u, Tonga (South Pacifi c), and it is its controversial ‘swim with humpback whale’ tourism industry which has attracted international attention from conservation and management agencies.

Tonga is a recognized breeding and birthing location for these whales. It is also the only destination in the world that offi cially allows tourists to actually swim in the wild with humpback whales and their newborn young, and consequently tourists specifi cally seek it as a holiday destination (IFAW, 2009). In other tourist destinations, the focus is on whale watching and the practice is governed typi-cally by stringent no-swimming and no-interference regulations in order to pro-tect the replenishing population. Signifi cantly, the Tongan activities involve tourist interaction in-water (i.e. swimming) with these whales and, most impor-tantly, with their newborn young during a critical period in their lives when ade-quate suckling is essential if they are to survive the long migration south to Antarctic waters, their summer feeding grounds. Thus, international wildlife con-servation agencies have concerns about the conduct of the practice and support various guidelines for the practice. The challenge for the sustainability of tourist activities in this setting is the confl ict of values with regard to whale conservation and tourism governance that exists between the various stakeholders, including the local residents, who typically make up the bulk of the guides, the tour opera-tion owners, who typically are expatriates, the conservaopera-tion agencies and the international aid donors to the country as a whole. This destination offers an opportunity to explore issues of the implementation of tourism governance systems in contested cross-cultural settings.

The chapter fi rstly will describe the controversial nature of the setting and then review briefl y the issues that have been identifi ed with governance and tourism development in cross-cultural settings, before describing a values-based sustainable tourism framework which offers a mechanism for responding to these

Controversial Ecotourism

Dalam dokumen Practice, Theory and Issues (Halaman 114-118)