5. Materi Pokok : Decribing Room
Guru memberikan contoh penulisan paragraf dengan metode Calibrated Peer Review
Guru meminta siswa mengecek content dan organization sebelum mengumpulkan tugas mereka
Guru meminta siswa untuk membaca paragraph yang di tulis oleh siswa yang lain atau membaca tulisan atau paragraph mereka sendiri.
Pertemuan Kedua
Siswa akan di berikan oleh guru tiga kalibirasi yang terdiri dari paragraf yang bagus, kurang bagus dan tidak bagus.
Guru mengawasi siswa dalam proses menulis paragraf agar dapat menjadi penilai yang adil.
Guru meminta siswa content dan organization sebelum mengumpulkan tugas mereka
Pertemuan ketiga
Siswa mereview tiga paragraph teman mereka.
Siswa menkalibirasi ketiga paragraph yang telah mereka terima
Guru meminta siswa mengecek content dan organization sebelum mengumpulkan tugas mereka
mengumpulkan tugas mereka
Guru mengumpulkan semua tugas mereka
Guru memeriksa dan mengevaluasi tugas hasil tugas mereka.
Kegiatan Akhir (15”)
Guru memberikan kesempatan kepada siswa untuk bertanya.
Menyimpulkan materi.
8. Sumber Pembelajaran
Grammar in Use
Look ahead book
Dictionary 9. Penilaian
Tehnik : Tertulis (individu) Aspek : Content dan Organization a. Content
Score Range Indicators of unity and completeness
A (9-10) Very Good
1. The ideas are about the topic selected 2. The ideas are clearly stated.
3. The ideas are clearly supported.
4. The ideas are comprehensible 5. The ideas are well developed 6. The ideas are relevant
7. The ideas fluently expressed
B (7-8 ) Good 4. The ideas are quite comprehensible 5. The ideas are generally
well-developed.
6. The ideas are adequate relevant.
7. The ideas are adequately expressed
C (5-6) Average
1. The ideas are about the topic selected 2. The ideas are rather clearly stated.
3. The ideas get enough supports.
4. The ideas are quite comprehensible.
5. The ideas are generally developed.
6. The ideas are quite relevant.
7. The ideas are sufficiently expressed.
D (3-4) Poor
1. The ideas are about the topic selected.
2. The ideas are not clearly stated.
3. The ideas get limit to support.
4. The ideas are not comprehensible 5. The ideas are not quite relevant.
6. The ideas are lack of developing.
7. The ideas are non-fluent expressed.
E (1-2)
Very Poor 1. The ideas are about the topic selected 2. The ideas are not clearly stated.
3. The ideas are not clearly supported.
4. The ideas are incomprehensible.
5. The ideas are irrelevant.
6. The ideas have very poor development.
7. The ideas are not communicative.
A (9-10) Very Good
2. The organization is concise.
3. The ideas are cohesion.
4. The ideas are coherent
5. The ideas are relevant to outline.
6. The ideas are presented in logical sequencing.
B (7-8 ) Good
1. The ideas are adequate organized.
2. The organization is adequate concise.
3. The ideas are adequate cohesion.
4. The ideas are adequate coherence 5. The ideas are relevant to outline.
6. The ideas are sufficient sequencing
C (5-6) Average
1. The ideas are generally organized.
2. The organization is quite concise 3. Few ideas are a break out cohesion.
4. The ideas are generally coherent.
5. The ideas are mostly relevant to outline.
6. The ideas are in some logical sequencing.
D (3-4) Poor
1. The ideas are almost loosely organized.
2. The organization is not concise 3. The ideas are inadequate cohesion 4. The ides are inadequate coherent.
5. The ideas are somewhat relevant to outline.
E(1-2)
3. The ideas are confuse and disconnected.
4. The ideas are incoherent.
5. The ideas are not or almost not relevant to out line.
6. The ideas are not or almost not presented in logical sequencing.
Makassar, Oct. 2014
Guru, Mahasiswa,
Nurhayati S.Pd Syamsir Idris NIP. 19711303 200701 1 108 Nim. 10535 4645 10
Mata Pelajaran : Bhs. Inggris Kelas/Semester : VIII.6 / 1 Pertemuan : 7 dan 8 Alokasi Waktu : 4 x 45 menit
Sekolah : SMPN 1 Pallangga ,Gowa Aspek Skill : Writing
1. Standar Kompetensi :
Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks monolog/esei tulis berbentuk descriptive secara akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari dan mengakses ilmu pengetahuan.
2. Kompetensi Dasar :
Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks monolog/esei yang menggunakan ragam bahasa tulis secara akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam teks berbentuk descriptive.
3. Indikator :
Menulis teks berbentuk monolog/esei dalamr bentuk descriptive teks.
5. Materi Pokok : Decribing Building
Borobudur is Hindu - Budhist temple. It was built in the ninth century under Sailendra dynasty of ancient Mataram kingdom. Borobudur is located in Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia.
Borobudur is well-known all over the world. Its construction is influenced by the Gupta architecture of India. The temple is constructed on a hill 46 m high and consists of eight steps like stone terrace. The first five terraces are square and surrounded by walls adorned with Budist sculpture in bas-relief.
The upper three are circular. Each of them is with a circle of bell shape-stupa.
The entire adifice is crowned by a large stupa at the centre at the centre of the top circle. The way to the summit extends through some 4.8 km of passage and starways. The design of borobudur which symbolizes the structure of universe influences temples at Angkor, Cambodia.
Borobudur temple which is rededicated as an Indonesian monument in 1983 is a valuable treasure for Indonesian people.
Bludus Articles
6. Metode Pembelajaran : Calibrated Peer Review 7. Langkah-langkah Kegiatan
Kegiatan Awal (15”)
Pertemuan Pertama
Guru menejelaskan secara singkat mengenai Calibrated peer review Guru menjelaskan tentang writing process approach.
Guru memberikan contoh penulisan paragraf dengan metode Calibrated Peer Review
Guru meminta siswa mengecek content dan organization sebelum mengumpulkan tugas mereka
Guru meminta siswa untuk membaca paragraph yang di tulis oleh siswa yang lain atau membaca tulisan atau paragraph mereka sendiri.
Pertemuan Kedua
Siswa akan di berikan oleh guru tiga kalibirasi yang terdiri dari paragraf yang bagus, kurang bagus dan tidak bagus.
Guru mengawasi siswa dalam proses menulis paragraf agar dapat menjadi penilai yang adil.
Guru meminta siswa mengecek content dan organization sebelum mengumpulkan tugas mereka
Pertemuan ketiga
Siswa mereview tiga paragraph teman mereka.
Siswa menkalibirasi ketiga paragraph yang telah mereka terima
Pertemuan keempat
Siswa melakukan penilaian terhadap paragraf mereka masing-masing.
Guru meminta siswa mengecek content dan organization sebelum mengumpulkan tugas mereka
Guru mengumpulkan semua tugas mereka
Guru memeriksa dan mengevaluasi tugas hasil tugas mereka.
Kegiatan Akhir (15”)
Guru memberikan kesempatan kepada siswa untuk bertanya.
Menyimpulkan materi.
8. Sumber Pembelajaran
Grammar in Use
Look ahead book
Dictionary 9. Penilaian
Tehnik : Tertulis (individu) Aspek : Content dan Organization a. Content
Score Range Indicators of unity and completeness
A (9-10) Very Good
1. The ideas are about the topic selected 2. The ideas are clearly stated.
3. The ideas are clearly supported.
4. The ideas are comprehensible
B (7-8 ) Good
1. The ideas are about the topic selected.
2. The ideas are clearly stated.
3. The ideas are clearly supported.
4. The ideas are quite comprehensible 5. The ideas are generally
well-developed.
6. The ideas are adequate relevant.
7. The ideas are adequately expressed
C (5-6) Average
1. The ideas are about the topic selected 2. The ideas are rather clearly stated.
3. The ideas get enough supports.
4. The ideas are quite comprehensible.
5. The ideas are generally developed.
6. The ideas are quite relevant.
7. The ideas are sufficiently expressed.
D (3-4) Poor
1. The ideas are about the topic selected.
2. The ideas are not clearly stated.
3. The ideas get limit to support.
4. The ideas are not comprehensible 5. The ideas are not quite relevant.
6. The ideas are lack of developing.
7. The ideas are non-fluent expressed.
E (1-2)
Very Poor 1. The ideas are about the topic selected 2. The ideas are not clearly stated.
3. The ideas are not clearly supported.
4. The ideas are incomprehensible.
5. The ideas are irrelevant.
b. Organization
Score Range Indicators of coherence and spatial order
A (9-10) Very Good
1. The ideas are-well organized.
2. The organization is concise.
3. The ideas are cohesion.
4. The ideas are coherent
5. The ideas are relevant to outline.
6. The ideas are presented in logical sequencing.
B (7-8 ) Good
1. The ideas are adequate organized.
2. The organization is adequate concise.
3. The ideas are adequate cohesion.
4. The ideas are adequate coherence 5. The ideas are relevant to outline.
6. The ideas are sufficient sequencing
C (5-6) Average
1. The ideas are generally organized.
2. The organization is quite concise 3. Few ideas are a break out cohesion.
4. The ideas are generally coherent.
5. The ideas are mostly relevant to outline.
6. The ideas are in some logical sequencing.
D (3-4) Poor 1. The ideas are almost loosely organized.
2. The organization is not concise
outline.
6. The ideas are lack logical sequencing.
E(1-2)
Very Poor 1. The organization are loosely organized 2. The organization is not concise
3. The ideas are confuse and disconnected.
4. The ideas are incoherent.
5. The ideas are not or almost not relevant to out line.
6. The ideas are not or almost not presented in logical sequencing.
Makassar, Oct. 2014
Guru, Mahasiswa,
Nurhayati S.Pd Syamsir Idris NIP. 19711303 200701 1 108 Nim. 10535 4645 10
