• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

There is a magazine and a camera on the bed

Borobudur is Hindu - Budhist temple. It was built in the ninth century under Sailendra dynasty of ancient Mataram kingdom. Borobudur is located in Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia.

Borobudur is well-known all over the world. Its construction is influenced by the Gupta architecture of India. The temple is constructed on a hill 46 m high and consists of eight step like stone terrace. The first five terraces are square and surrounded by walls adorned with Budist sculpture in bas-relief.

The upper three are circular. Each of them is with a circle of bell shape-stupa.

The entire edifice is crowned by a large stupa at the centre at the centre of the top circle. The way to the summit extends through some 4.8 km of passage and stairways. The design of borobudur which symbolizes the structure of universe influences temples at Angkor, Cambodia.

Borobudur temple which is dedicated as an Indonesian monument in 1983 is a valuable treasure for Indonesian people.

(RPP)

Mata Pelajaran : Bhs. Inggris Kelas/Semester : VIII.6 / 1 Pertemuan : 1 dan 2 Alokasi Waktu : 4 x 45 menit

Sekolah : SMPN 1 Pallangga ,Gowa Aspek Skill : Writing

1. Standar Kompetensi :

Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks monolog/esei tulis berbentuk descriptive secara akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari dan mengakses ilmu pengetahuan.

2. Kompetensi Dasar :

Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks monolog/esei yang menggunakan ragam bahasa tulis secara akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam teks berbentuk descriptive.

3. Indikator :

 Menulis teks berbentuk monolog/esei dalam bentuk descriptive teks.

5. Materi Pokok : Describing Person

Size/ Quality Color Noun

Big Thick Narrow Small Flat Kinky

Black Grey Dark Red

Hair Nose Head Cheeck

6. Metode Pembelajaran : Calibrated Peer Review 7. Langkah-langkah Kegiatan

 Kegiatan Awal (15”)

 Motivasi dan apersepsi

 Recall

 Kegiatan Inti (2×70”) Pertemuan Pertama

 Guru menejelaskan secara singkat mengenai Calibrated peer review Guru menjelaskan tentang writing process approach.

 Guru memberikan contoh penulisan paragraf dengan metode Calibrated Peer Review

 Guru meminta siswa mengecek content dan organization sebelum mengumpulkan tugas mereka

 Guru meminta siswa untuk membaca paragraph yang di tulis oleh siswa yang lain atau membaca tulisan atau paragraph mereka sendiri.

 Guru mengawasi siswa dalam proses menulis paragraf agar dapat menjadi penilai yang adil.

 Guru meminta siswa mengecek content dan organization sebelum mengumpulkan tugas mereka

Pertemuan ketiga

 Siswa mereview tiga paragraph teman mereka.

 Siswa menkalibirasi ketiga paragraph yang telah mereka terima

 Guru meminta siswa mengecek content dan organization sebelum mengumpulkan tugas mereka

Pertemuan keempat

 Siswa melakukan penilaian terhadap paragraf mereka masing-masing.

 Guru meminta siswa mengecek content dan organization sebelum mengumpulkan tugas mereka

 Guru mengumpulkan semua tugas mereka

 Guru memeriksa dan mengevaluasi tugas hasil tugas mereka.

 Kegiatan Akhir (15”)

 Guru memberikan kesempatan kepada siswa untuk bertanya.

 Menyimpulkan materi.

8. Sumber Pembelajaran

 Grammar in Use

Tehnik : Tertulis (individu)

Aspek : Content dan Organization a. Content

Score Range Indicators of unity and completeness

A (9-10) Very Good

1. The ideas are about the topic selected 2. The ideas are clearly stated.

3. The ideas are clearly supported.

4. The ideas are comprehensible 5. The ideas are well developed 6. The ideas are relevant

7. The ideas fluently expressed

B (7-8 ) Good

1. The ideas are about the topic selected.

2. The ideas are clearly stated.

3. The ideas are clearly supported.

4. The ideas are quite comprehensible 5. The ideas are generally

well-developed.

6. The ideas are adequate relevant.

7. The ideas are adequately expressed

C (5-6) Average

1. The ideas are about the topic selected 2. The ideas are rather clearly stated.

3. The ideas get enough supports.

4. The ideas are quite comprehensible.

5. The ideas are generally developed.

6. The ideas are quite relevant.

7. The ideas are sufficiently expressed.

4. The ideas are not comprehensible 5. The ideas are not quite relevant.

6. The ideas are lack of developing.

7. The ideas are non-fluent expressed.

E (1-2)

Very Poor 1. The ideas are about the topic selected 2. The ideas are not clearly stated.

3. The ideas are not clearly supported.

4. The ideas are incomprehensible.

5. The ideas are irrelevant.

6. The ideas have very poor development.

7. The ideas are not communicative.

b. Organization

Score Range Indicators of coherence and spatial order

A (9-10) Very Good

1. The ideas are-well organized.

2. The organization is concise.

3. The ideas are cohesion.

4. The ideas are coherent

5. The ideas are relevant to outline.

6. The ideas are presented in logical sequencing.

B (7-8 ) Good

1. The ideas are adequate organized.

2. The organization is adequate concise.

3. The ideas are adequate cohesion.

4. The ideas are adequate coherence 5. The ideas are relevant to outline.

C (5-6) Average

3. Few ideas are a break out cohesion.

4. The ideas are generally coherent.

5. The ideas are mostly relevant to outline.

6. The ideas are in some logical sequencing.

D (3-4) Poor

1. The ideas are almost loosely organized.

2. The organization is not concise 3. The ideas are inadequate cohesion 4. The ides are inadequate coherent.

5. The ideas are somewhat relevant to outline.

6. The ideas are lack logical sequencing.

E(1-2)

Very Poor 1. The organization are loosely organized 2. The organization is not concise

3. The ideas are confuse and disconnected.

4. The ideas are incoherent.

5. The ideas are not or almost not relevant to out line.

6. The ideas are not or almost not presented in logical sequencing.

Makassar, Oct. 2014

Guru, Mahasiswa,

Nurhayati S.Pd Syamsir Idris NIP. 19711303 200701 1 108 Nim. 10535 4645 10

Mata Pelajaran : Bhs. Inggris Kelas/Semester : VIII.6 / 1 Pertemuan : 3 dan 4 Alokasi Waktu : 4 x 45 menit

Sekolah : SMPN 1 Pallangga ,Gowa Aspek Skill : Writing

1. Standar Kompetensi :

Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks monolog/esei tulis berbentuk descriptive secara akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari dan mengakses ilmu pengetahuan.

2. Kompetensi Dasar :

Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks monolog/esei yang menggunakan ragam bahasa tulis secara akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam teks berbentuk descriptive.

3. Indikator :

 Menulis teks berbentuk monolog/esei dalam bentuk descriptive teks.

5. Materi Pokok : Decribing Place

Describing place

Losari Beach, Icon of Makassar

Losari is an icon of the city of Makassar, on Jalan Penghibur, which is located to the west of the city of Makassar, South Sulawesi. Makassar City Government has beautify beaches by making the bridge area of 100 thousand square meters, making it look more beautiful, clean, pollution-free and comfortable place to visit. Sightseeing is the most visited in the afternoon, between the hours of 5 pm to 9 pm. In addition, Losari beach crowded city residents to exercise in the morning during the holidays.

Losari is typical icon Makassar which is one of the popular in Indonesia, situated overlooking the sea off is the most popular attractions South Sulawesi. Losari is very strategic layout, making it easy to access. Sukarno Hatta port of Makassar, the beach can be reached about 15 minutes by car or motorcycle. If departing from Hasanuddin Airport, can be reached about 45 minutes by car or motorcycle.

Free of charge if it enters the area Losari. Unless paid parking for carrying vehicles. Around the attractions available various types of vehicles, such as buses, taxis, and rickshaws are available to take visitors around to enjoy the atmosphere of the city of Makassar. Along Penghibur Street also available accommodation facilities ranging from guesthouse to luxury hotels, restaurants, cafes, hospitals, coffee shops, and various other entertainment venues, and all sea facing. At Somba Opu Street, not far from the attractions, there are shopping gold crafts and souvenirs typical of Makassar.

 Motivasi dan apersepsi

 Recall

 Kegiatan Inti (2×70”) Pertemuan Pertama

 Guru menejelaskan secara singkat mengenai Calibrated peer review Guru menjelaskan tentang writing process approach.

 Guru memberikan contoh penulisan paragraf dengan metode Calibrated Peer Review

 Guru meminta siswa mengecek content dan organization sebelum mengumpulkan tugas mereka

 Guru meminta siswa untuk membaca paragraph yang di tulis oleh siswa yang lain atau membaca tulisan atau paragraph mereka sendiri.

Pertemuan Kedua

 Siswa akan di berikan oleh guru tiga kalibirasi yang terdiri dari paragraf yang bagus, kurang bagus dan tidak bagus.

 Guru mengawasi siswa dalam proses menulis paragraf agar dapat menjadi penilai yang adil.

 Guru meminta siswa mengecek content dan organization sebelum mengumpulkan tugas mereka

 Guru meminta siswa mengecek content dan organization sebelum mengumpulkan tugas mereka

Pertemuan keempat

 Siswa melakukan penilaian terhadap paragraf mereka masing-masing.

 Guru meminta siswa content dan organization sebelum mengumpulkan tugas mereka

 Guru mengumpulkan semua tugas mereka

 Guru memeriksa dan mengevaluasi tugas hasil tugas mereka.

 Kegiatan Akhir (15”)

 Guru memberikan kesempatan kepada siswa untuk bertanya.

 Menyimpulkan materi.

8. Sumber Pembelajaran

 Grammar in Use

 Look ahead book

 Dictionary 9. Penilaian

Tehnik : Tertulis (individu) Aspek : Content dan Organization

A (9-10) Very Good

2. The ideas are clearly stated.

3. The ideas are clearly supported.

4. The ideas are comprehensible 5. The ideas are well developed 6. The ideas are relevant

7. The ideas fluently expressed

B (7-8 ) Good

1. The ideas are about the topic selected.

2. The ideas are clearly stated.

3. The ideas are clearly supported.

4. The ideas are quite comprehensible 5. The ideas are generally

well-developed.

6. The ideas are adequate relevant.

7. The ideas are adequately expressed

C (5-6) Average

1. The ideas are about the topic selected 2. The ideas are rather clearly stated.

3. The ideas get enough supports.

4. The ideas are quite comprehensible.

5. The ideas are generally developed.

6. The ideas are quite relevant.

7. The ideas are sufficiently expressed.

D (3-4) Poor

1. The ideas are about the topic selected.

2. The ideas are not clearly stated.

3. The ideas get limit to support.

4. The ideas are not comprehensible 5. The ideas are not quite relevant.

6. The ideas are lack of developing.

E (1-2)

3. The ideas are not clearly supported.

4. The ideas are incomprehensible.

5. The ideas are irrelevant.

6. The ideas have very poor development.

7. The ideas are not communicative.

b. Organization

Score Range Indicators of coherence and spatial order

A (9-10) Very Good

1. The ideas are-well organized.

2. The organization is concise.

3. The ideas are cohesion.

4. The ideas are coherent

5. The ideas are relevant to outline.

6. The ideas are presented in logical sequencing.

B (7-8 ) Good

1. The ideas are adequate organized.

2. The organization is adequate concise.

3. The ideas are adequate cohesion.

4. The ideas are adequate coherence 5. The ideas are relevant to outline.

6. The ideas are sufficient sequencing

C (5-6) Average

1. The ideas are generally organized.

2. The organization is quite concise 3. Few ideas are a break out cohesion.

4. The ideas are generally coherent.

5. The ideas are mostly relevant to

D (3-4) Poor

1. The ideas are almost loosely organized.

2. The organization is not concise 3. The ideas are inadequate cohesion 4. The ides are inadequate coherent.

5. The ideas are somewhat relevant to outline.

6. The ideas are lack logical sequencing.

E(1-2)

Very Poor 1. The organization are loosely organized 2. The organization is not concise

3. The ideas are confuse and disconnected.

4. The ideas are incoherent.

5. The ideas are not or almost not relevant to out line.

6. The ideas are not or almost not presented in logical sequencing.

Makassar, Oct. 2014

Guru, Mahasiswa,

Nurhayati S.Pd Syamsir Idris NIP. 19711303 200701 1 108 Nim. 10535 4645 10

Mata Pelajaran : Bhs. Inggris Kelas/Semester : VIII.6 / 1 Pertemuan : 5 dan 6 Alokasi Waktu : 4 x 45 menit

Sekolah : SMPN 1 Pallangga ,Gowa Aspek Skill : Writing

1. Standar Kompetensi :

Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks monolog/esei tulis berbentuk descriptive secara akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari dan mengakses ilmu pengetahuan.

2. Kompetensi Dasar :

Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks monolog/esei yang menggunakan ragam bahasa tulis secara akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam teks berbentuk dan descriptive.

3. Indikator :

 Menulis teks berbentuk monolog/esei dalam bentuk descriptive teks.

5. Materi Pokok : Decribing Room

Dokumen terkait