BAHAN DAN METODE PENELITIAN
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Afzalani R A Mathalib Dan E Musnandar 2008 Preferensi Pakan, Tingkah Laku Makan dan Kebutuhan Nutrien pada Rusa Sambar (Cervus unicolor)
dalam Usaha Penangkaran di Provinsi Jambi Media Peternakan issn 0126-472 Vol 31 (2) HAL : 114-121 Jambi
Anderson, R 1984 Deer farming in Australia In: Deer Refresher Course Proceedings no 72 Sydney: University of Sydney
Anggorodi, R 1979 Ilmu Makanan Ternak Umum Gamedia Pustaka Utama,Jakarta
Akoso, T B 1996 Kesehatan Sapi Kanisius, Yogyakarta
Ariantiningsih, F 2000 Sistem Perburuan dan Sikap Masyarakat Terhadap Usaha-Usaha Konservasi Rusa Dipulau Rumberpon Kecamatan Ransiki Kabupaten Manokwari (skripsi) Universitas Cendrawasih Manokwari Awal, A , N J Sarker, and K Z Husain 1992 Breeding records of sambar deer
(Cervus unicolor) in captivity Bangladesh Journal of Zoology 20: 285-290 Proceedings The Royal Society of New Zealand Bulletin 22: 379-380
Bainbridge D R J and Jabbour H N, (1998) Potential of assisted breeding techniques for the conservation of endangered mamalian species in captivity: a review
The veterinary record 143: 159-168
Bellaney C F 1993 Fallow deer velvet and co-product Proceedings of the First World Forum on Fallow deer farming Mudgee, NSW Australia:197-198
Causey, M K 2006 White-Tailed Deer Nutrition off-season Food Management The School of Forestry & Wildlife Sciences Alabama University, USA
Davendra, C 1997 Utilization of Feeding Stuff for Livestock in South East Asia Malaysia Agicultural Research and Development Institute Serdang, Malaysia
Davies, H L 1982 Nutrition and Gowth Manual Australia University International Development Press, Australia
Djajanegara, A 1999 Local livestock feed resources In: Livestock Industries of Indonesia Prior to the Asian Financial Crisis RAP Publication 1999/37 : 29-39
Dradjat, A S 2000 Penerapan Teknologi Inseminasi Buatan , Embrio Transfer dan Invitro Fertilisasi pada Rusa Indonesia Laporan Riset Unggulan terpadu V Bidang Teknologi Perlindungan Lingkungan Pp:92-111
Dradjat A.S, (2001) Hubungan antara status ranggah dan aktifitas reproduksi pada rusa bawean (Axis kuhlii) jantan. Buletin Peternakan 25(4): 152-161.
Dradjat A.S, (2002) Inseminasi buatan pada rusa Indonesia. Prosidings Seminar Nasional Peningkatan Pendapatan Petani Melalui Penerapan Teknologi Tepat Guna: 156-162.
Dryden. G. 1999. Nutrient Requiretment of Rusa Deer In Le Cerf Rusa en Nouvelb Caledonie CIRAD. Port Laguerre. PP. 11-22.
English AW 1992 Management strategies for farmed chital deer In: The Biology of Deer Ed: RD Brown 189-195
English A W and Mulley R C 1992 Causes of Perinatal Mortality in Farmed Fallow Deer (Dama dama) Australian Veterinary Journal 69:191-193
Frandson 1982 Anatomi dan Fisiologi Ternak Terjemahan Srigandowo dan Praseno Gadjahmada University press Yogyakarta
Garsetiasih, R 1988 Daya cerna rumput dan campurannya dengan daun beringin, daun kabesak, dan daun turi sebagai pakan rusa (Cervus timorensis) Buletin Santalum 3:17-26
Garsetiasih, R 2000 Bioekologi rusa timor dan peluang pengembangan budidayanya Buletin Kehutanan dan Perkebunan 1(1):21-32
Garsetiasih, R dan Mariana 2007 Model penangkaran rusa Prosiding Ekspose Hasil-Hasil Penelitian 2007
Garsetiasih R, Takandjanji M 2007 Model penangkaran rusa Prosiding Ekspose Hasil-hasil Penelitian Seminar Konservasi dan Rehabilitasi Hutan, Padang Sumatera Barat
Ginting S P 2009 Pedoman Teknis Pemeliharaan Induk dan Anak Kambing Masa Pra-sapih Loka Penelitian Kambing Potong Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Peternakan Medan
Guinness F , Lincoln G A and Short R V 1971 The reproductive cycle of the female red deer, Cervus elaphus Journal of Reproduction and Fertility
27:427-438
Haigh J C , Dradjat A S and English A W 1993 Comparison of two extenders for the cryopreservation of Chital (Axis- axis) semen Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 24:454-458
Handarini R WMM Nalley, G Semiadi, S Agungpriyono, Sumbandriyo, B Purwantara, MR Toelihere 2004 Lama tahap pertumbuhan ranggah rusa timor (Cervus timorensis) jantan dalam satu siklus ranggah Seminar Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner Puslitbang Peternakan, Bogor, 4-5 Agustus 2004
Handarini R WMM Nalley, B Purwantara, MR Toelihere 2005 Semen Characteristic ang goss testicular morphometry in Timor Deer (Cervus timorensis) Proc International Asia Link Symposium, Denpasar 19-20 Agustus 2005, 11-113
Handarini R 2006 Dinamika Aktivitas Rerpoduksi Berkaitan dengan tahap pertumbuhan Ranggah Rusa Timor (Cervus Timorensis) jantan dewasa Disertasi Progam studi biologi ternak Fakultas Peternakan Insitut Pertanian Bogor
Handarini, R ND Hanafi, M Tafsin 2009 Upaya Peningkatan Populasi Rusa Sambar (Cervus unicolor) Melalui Pendekatan Nutrisi Dan Manajemen Reproduksi Laporan Penelitian Hibah Bersaing, Faperta USU Medan
Hunting PA_com, 2001 White Tail Deer Nutrition The Mississippi State University Extension Service
Imelda 2004 Tingkah Laku Sosial Rusa Sambar (Cervus unicolor Equinus) di Balai Raya Semarak Bengkulu Skripsi Progam Studi Produksi Ternak Jurusan Peternakan Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Bengkulu 96 hal Kasryno, F dan N Syafa'at 2000 Strategi Pembangunan Pertanian yang
Berorientasi Pemerataan di Tingkat Petani, Sektoral dan Wilayah Prosiding PerspektifPembangunan Pertanian dan Pedesaan dalam Era Otonomi Daerah (Penyunting: I W RUSASTRA et al ) Pusat Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Badan Litbang Pertanian, Departemen Pertanian, Jakarta
Kartadisastra, H R , 1997 Penyediaan dan Pengelolaan Pakan Ternak Ruminansia Kanisius, Yogyakarta
Killian. A.M. 1996. Assessment of Utility Production and Physical Charateristics of Rusa Deer (Cervus Timorensis) In Sub District of Merauke and Okaba. Irian Jaya. Indonesia. University of Philipines, Los Banos. Phillipines.
[Laboratorium Ilmu Makanan Ternak], 2005 Departemen Peternakan FP USU, Medan
Lewis, J C , L B Flynn, R L Marchinton, S M Shea, and E M Marchinton 1990 Part I Introduction, study area description and literature review In: Ecology of sambar on St Vincent National Wildlife Refugee Florida Li, C , Jiang, Z , Jiang, G dan Fang, J 2001 Seasonal changes of reproductive
behavior and fecal steroid concentrations in Perè David`s deer Hormones and Behavior Vol 40 hal: 518-525
Lincoln GA 1992 Biology of antlers J Zoo 226: 517-528
Martawidjaja, M , Setiadi, B , Sitorus, S S 1999 Pengaruh Tingkat Protein Energi Ransum terhadap Kinerja Produksi Kambing Kacang Muda, Balai Penelitian Ternak Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner
McDonald, P , Edwards, A R , Geen Halg, J F D , and Morgan 1995 Animal Nutrition Fifth Editing, Ohn Wiley and Sons Inc, New York
Mukhtar, A S 1996 Studi Dinamika Populasi Rusa (Cervus timorensis de Blainville) dalam Menunjang Manajemen Taman Buru Pulau Moyo, Propinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat Disertasi S3 Kehutanan Institut Pertanian Bogor
Murtidjo, A B 1990 Beternak Sapi Potong Kanisius, Yogyakarta
Murtidjo, B A , 1993 Memelihara Domba Kanisius, Yogyakarta
Nelson T.A. and Woolf A. (1987) Mortality of white-tailed deer fawns in southern Illinois. Journal of Wildlife Management. 51 (2):326-329.
Nugraha H. 2009. Analisis pola penggunaan ruang banteng (Bos javanicus
d’Alton 1823) di Cagar Alam dan Taman Wisata Alam Pangandaran, Jawa Barat. Skripsi. Jurusan Konservasi Sumber Daya Hutan, Fakultas Kehutanan IPB. Bogor.
Parakkasi, A 1995 Ilmu Nutrisi dan Makanan Ternak Ruminansia UI-Press, Jakarta
Partodihardjo 1982 Ilmu Reproduksi Hewan Mutiara Jakarta
Perkins JR, 1991. Texas Taman Margasatwa dan Perikanan Departemen & Divisi Margasatwa 1991 Kontribusi W Proyek Bantuan Federal-129
Pilliang, G W , 1997 Strategi Penyediaan Pakan Ternak Berkelanjutan Melalui Pemanfaatan Energi Alternatif Orasi Ilmiah Fakultas Peternakan IPB, Bogor
Salisbury, G W dan Vandenmark, N L , 1985 Fisiologi Reproduksi dan Inseminasi Buatan Pada Sapi Diterjemahkan oleh Djanuar, N , UGM Press, Yogyakarta
Semiadi G 1998 Budidaya Rusa Tropika sebagai Hewan Ternak Masy Zoologi Indonesia, Bogor
Semiadi G 2001 Pemanfaatan Rusa Tropik sebagai Ternak Baru Makalah Reasonable Discussion Potensi Peternakan Rusa, Puslitbang Pertanian, Bogor 11 Desember 2001
Semiadi, G. R T P Nugaha, 2004 Panduan Pemeliharaan Rusa Tropis Bogor: Pusat Penelitian Biologi LIPI
Siregar, Z 2003 Komposisi Zat-Zat Nutrisi Dalam Pakan Unggas USU Press, Medan
Sitio, J 2009 Suplementasi Blok Multinutrisi Terhadap Pertumbuhan Rusa Sambar (Cervus unicolor) Fase Ranggah Lunak Skripsi Departemen Peternakan Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Sumatera Utara Medan
Soegiri, J , M S Siahaan, dan N M Thaib 1981 Ransum praktis untuk ternak potong Direktorat Bina produksi Dirjen Peternakan Jakarta
Steel. R.G.D. dan J.H. Torrie. 1995. Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika Penterjemah Bambang Sumantri, Gramedia Pustaka. Jakarta.
Suharno, B dan Nazaruddin, 1994 Ternak Komersil Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta
Sumoprastowo, R M 1980 Beternak kambing yang berhasil Bhratara Karya Aksara, Jakarta
Takandjandji, M 1993 Pengaruh Perbedaan Manajemen terhadap Pertumbuhan Rusa Timor (Cervus timorensis) di Oilsonbai dan Camplong, NTT Santalum Nomor 12 BPK Kupang
Tillman, A, D, H, Hartadi, S, Reksohadiprojo, S, Prawirokusumo, dan S, Lepdosoekojo , 1981 Ilmu Makanan Ternak Dasar Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta
Toelihere, MR Semiadi G Yusuf LT 2005 Potensi Rerpoduksi Rusa Timor (Cervus timorensis) sebagai komoditas ternak baru: upaya pengembangan populasi di penangkaran melalui pengkajian dan penerapan teknologi inseminasi buatan Hibah Penelitian Pasca Sarjana Angkatan I tahun 2003-2005 Insitut Pertanian Bogor
Tomaszeweska, M, W, J, M , Mastika, A, Djaya Negara, S, Gardiner dan T, R, Wiradarya , 1993 Produksi Kambing dan Domba di Indonesia Universitas 11 Maret, Surabaya
Warisman, 2009. Penggunaan Suplementasi Blok Multinutrisi dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Produktivitas Domba Jantan. Jurnal Agribisnis Peternakan Vol.4 no 2 Agustus 2008.
Whitehead, G K 1994 Encylopedia of Deer Shrewsbury: Swann Hill Press.
Yamin A.M., 2002. Pengaruh Tingkat Protein Ransum Terhadap Konsumsi Pertambahan Bobot Badan dan IOFC Ayam Buras Umur 0-8 Minggu. Jurnal Agroland Vol. 9 No. 3 September 2002.
LAMPIRAN
1. Tabel Daya makan sukarela rusa betina dewasa.
Ket : R = Rusa betina
2. Tabel Bobot badan induk rusa/penimbangan
PERLAKUAN Penimbangan (Kg/ekor/bulan kebuntingan)
I II III IV V VI P 11 62,10 63,50 64,70 66,20 67,90 69,30 P 12 75,00 75,90 77,00 78,00 79,50 80,60 P 21 52,50 53,80 55,10 56,70 58,00 59,70 P 22 77,60 79,10 80,60 82,30 83,70 84,90 P 31 74,40 75,60 76,90 78,50 80,30 82,00 P 32 94,00 95,30 96,70 98,20 99,80 101,00
3. Tabel Rataan konsumsi hijauan segar setiap bulan kebuntingan (g)
Perlakuan
Konsumsi hijauan segar (g/ekor/bulan kebuntingan)
I II III IV V VI VII P 11 249.660,00 252.440,00 255.000,00 257.470,00 259.590,00 262.900,00 264.000,00 P 12 277.400,00 279.980,00 283.400,00 286.550,00 289.900,00 292.840,00 295.000,00 P 21 209.400,00 210.800,00 211.600,00 212.400,00 214.450,00 215.380,00 217.860,00 P 22 304.000,00 306.500,00 308.880,00 311.320,00 313.400,00 315.550,00 317.570,00 P 31 281.440,00 286.800,00 290.150,00 294.500,00 297.500,00 299.430,00 302.560,00 P 32 349.000,00 353.000,00 356.700,00 359.000,00 363.650,00 366.600,00 368.400,00 Rataan 278.483,33 281.586,67 284.288,33 286.873,33 289.748,33 292.116,67 294.231,67
Daya makan Sukarela Perlakuan Bahan Segar (g) Konsumsi bahan segar dari
bobot badan Induk (%) Bahan Kering (g)
R1 8048,19 12,96 1784,29 R2 8140,98 10,85 1804,86 R3 8114,96 11,42 1799,09 R4 8122,31 15,47 1800,72 R5 7912,26 10,19 1754,15 R6 8082,30 10,23 1791,85 R7 7883,44 10,59 1747,76 R8 8026,21 8,53 1779,41 R9 9700,97 13,28 2150,71 Rataan 8225,74 11,50 1823,64
4. Tabel Rataan konsumsi hijauan bahan kering setiap bulan kebuntingan (g)
Perlakuan Konsumsi bahan kering hijauan (g/ekor/bulan kebuntingan)
I II III IV V VI VII VIII
P 11 55.349,62 55.965,95 56.533,50 57.081,10 57.551,10 58.284,93 58.528,80 P 12 61.499,58 62.071,57 62.829,78 63.528,14 64.270,83 64.922,63 65.401,50 P 21 46.423,98 46.734,36 46.911,72 47.089,08 47.543,57 47.749,75 48.299,56 P 22 67.396,80 67.951,05 68.478,70 69.019,64 69.480,78 69.957,44 70.405,27 P 31 62.395,25 63.583,56 64.326,26 65.290,65 65.955,75 66.383,63 67.077,55 P 32 77.373,30 78.260,10 79.080,39 79.590,30 80.621,21 81.275,22 81.674,28 Rataan 61.739,76 62.427,76 63.026,72 63.599,82 64.237,21 64.762,27 65.231,16
5. Tabel Rataan konsumsi hijauan perlakuan dalam bahan kering (g/ekor/hari)
Perlakuan Kelompok Total
1 2
P1 1.840,82 2.084,04 3.924,87
P2 1.548,36 2.259,55 3.807,91
P3 2.133,19 2.623,17 4.756,36
Total 5.522,37 6.966,77 12.489,14
6. Tabel Rataan konsumsi konsentrat segar setiap bulan kebuntingan (g) Perlakuan
Konsumsi konsentrat segar (g/ekor/bulan kebuntingan)
I II III IV V VI VII P 11 21.735,00 19.050,00 20.057,00 20.522,00 19.691,00 21.483,00 22.010,00 22.785,00 P 12 20.250,00 26.565,00 23.100,00 24.180,00 24.645,00 23.374,00 25.451,00 26.226,00 P 21 14.175,00 18.830,00 16.530,00 17.577,00 17.980,00 17.313,00 19.034,00 19.747,00 P 22 20.952,00 27.685,00 24.180,00 25.513,00 25.947,00 24.621,00 26.877,00 27.497,00 P 31 22.320,00 23.436,00 23.839,00 22.765,00 24.893,00 25.420,00 25.947,00 25.800,00 P 32 25.380,00 33.355,00 29.010,00 30.442,00 30.938,00 29.290,00 31.806,00 32.643,00 Rataan 20.802,00 24.820,17 22.786,00 23.499,83 24.015,67 23.583,50 25.187,50 25.783,00
7. Tabel Rataan konsumsi konsentrat dalam bahan kering setiap bulan kebuntingan (g)
Perlakuan
Konsumsi bahan kering konsentrat (g/ekor/bulan kebuntingan)
I II III IV V VI VII P 11 19.468,04 17.063,09 17.965,05 18.381,56 17.637,23 19.242,32 19.714,36 20.408,52 P 12 18.137,93 23.794,27 20.690,67 21.658,03 22.074,53 20.936,09 22.796,46 23.490,63 P 21 12.413,05 16.489,43 14.475,32 15.392,18 15.745,09 15.160,99 16.668,07 17.292,45 P 22 18.347,67 24.243,75 21.174,43 22.341,73 22.721,79 21.560,61 23.536,19 24.079,12 P 31 19.507,68 20.483,06 20.835,29 19.896,61 21.756,48 22.217,08 22.677,68 22.549,20 P 32 22.182,12 29.152,27 25.354,74 26.606,31 27.039,81 25.599,46 27.798,44 28.529,98 Rataan 18.342,75 21.870,98 20.082,58 20.712,74 21.162,49 20.786,09 22.198,53 22.724,98 8. Tabel Rataan konsumsi konsentrat perlakuan dalam bahan kering (g/ekor/hari)
Perlakuan Kelompok Total
1 2
P1 601,93 708,48 1.310,41
P2 504,64 726,55 1.231,19
P3 693,56 869,93 1.563,49
Total 1.800,13 2.304,97 4.105,09
9. Tabel Rataan total konsumsi hijauan dan konsentrat dalam bahan kering setiap bulan penimbangan (g)
Total konsumsi baahan kering ransum (g/ekor/bulan kebuntingan)
Perlakuan I II III IV V VI VII
P 11 74.817,66 73.029,03 74.498,55 75.462,65 75.188,33 77.527,25 78.243,16
P 21 58.837,03 63.223,79 61.387,04 62.481,26 63.288,65 62.910,74 64.967,64
P 22 85.744,47 92.194,80 89.653,12 91.361,38 92.202,57 91.518,04 93.941,46
P 31 81.902,93 84.066,62 85.161,54 85.187,26 87.712,23 88.600,71 89.755,23
P 32 99.555,42 107.412,37 104.435,13 106.196,61 107.661,02 106.874,68 109.472,72
Rataan 80.082,50 84.298,74 83.109,31 84.312,55 85.399,69 85.548,36 87.429,69
10. Tabel Rataan konsumsi konsentrat dan hijauan perlakuan dalam bahan kering (g/ekor/hari)
Perlakuan Kelompok Total
1 2
P1 2.442,75 2.792,53 5.235,28
P2 2.053,00 2.986,10 5.039,10
P3 2.826,75 3.493,11 6.319,86
Total 7.322,50 9.271,73 16.594,24
11. Tabel Rataan konsumsi protein kasar dari hijauan setiap bulan kebuntingan (g)
lakuan Konsumsi protein kasar dari hijauan (g/ekor/bulan kebuntingan)
Total Rataan Rataan (g/ekor
I II III IV V VI VII VIII
P 11 5.867,06 5.932,39 5.992,55 6.050,60 6.100,42 6.178,20 6.204,05 6.261,39 48.586,66 6.073,33 195,13 P 12 6.518,96 6.579,59 6.659,96 6.733,98 6.812,71 6.881,80 6.932,56 7.003,06 54.122,61 6.765,33 220,91 P 21 4.920,94 4.953,84 4.972,64 4.991,44 5.039,62 5.061,47 5.119,75 5.151,24 40.210,96 5.026,37 164,13 P 22 7.144,06 7.202,81 7.258,74 7.316,08 7.364,96 7.415,49 7.462,96 7.515,36 58.680,47 7.335,06 239,51 P 31 6.613,90 6.739,86 6.818,58 6.920,81 6.991,31 7.036,66 7.110,22 7.167,56 55.398,90 6.924,86 226,12 P 32 8.201,57 8.295,57 8.382,52 8.436,57 8.545,85 8.615,17 8.657,47 8.711,05 67.845,78 8.480,72 278,06 ataan 6.544,41 6.617,34 6.680,83 6.741,58 6.809,14 6.864,80 6.914,50 6.968,28 54.140,90 6.767,61 220,64
12. Tabel Rataan konsumsi protein kasar dari konsentrat setiap bulan kebuntingan (g)
Perlakuan Konsumsi protein kasar dari konsentrat (g/ekor/bulan kebuntingan)
I II III IV V VI VII VIII
P 11 3.280,36 2.875,13 3.027,11 3.097,29 2.971,87 3.242,33 3.321,87 3.438,84 25.254,81 P 12 3.056,24 4.009,33 3.486,38 3.649,38 3.719,56 3.527,73 3.841,20 3.958,17 29.247,99 P 21 2.425,51 3.222,03 2.828,48 3.007,63 3.076,59 2.962,46 3.256,94 3.378,94 24.158,59 P 22 3.585,13 4.737,23 4.137,48 4.365,57 4.439,84 4.212,94 4.598,97 4.705,06 34.782,23 P 31 4.198,05 4.407,96 4.483,75 4.281,75 4.681,99 4.781,12 4.880,24 4.852,59 36.567,45 P 32 4.773,59 6.273,57 5.456,34 5.725,68 5.818,97 5.509,00 5.982,23 6.139,65 45.679,03 Rataan 3.553,15 4.254,21 3.903,26 4.021,22 4.118,14 4.039,26 4.313,57 4.412,21 32.615,02
13. Tabel Rataan total konsumsi protein kasar hijauan dan konsentrat dalam bahan kering setiap bulan kebuntingan (g)
Perlakuan Total konsumsi protein kasar hijauan dan konsentrat (g/ekor/bulan kebuntingan)
I II III IV V VI VII P 11 9.147,42 8.807,52 9.019,66 9.147,89 9.072,29 9.420,53 9.525,92 9.700,23 P 12 9.575,20 10.588,92 10.146,33 10.383,36 10.532,27 10.409,53 10.773,76 10.961,23 P 21 7.346,45 8.175,88 7.801,12 7.999,07 8.116,21 8.023,93 8.376,70 8.530,19 P 22 10.729,19 11.940,04 11.396,22 11.681,66 11.804,80 11.628,43 12.061,93 12.220,42 P 31 10.811,95 11.147,81 11.302,34 11.202,56 11.673,30 11.817,78 11.990,46 12.020,15 P 32 12.975,16 14.569,14 13.838,86 14.162,25 14.364,82 14.124,18 14.639,70 14.850,71 Rataan 10.097,56 10.871,55 10.584,09 10.762,80 10.927,28 10.904,06 11.228,08 11.380,49
14. Tabel Rataan konsumsi protein kasar konsentrat dan hijauan perlakuan dalam bahan kering (g/ekor/hari)
Perlakuan Kelompok Total
1 2
P1 296,55 340,29 636,84
P2 262,73 381,48 644,21
P3 375,37 465,27 1.281,05
15. Tabel Rataan pertambahan bobot badan induk setiap bulan kebuntingan (g/ekor/hari)
Perlakuan Bulan kebuntingan
I II III IV V VI VII VIII
P 11 46,67 40,00 50,00 56,67 46,67 56,67 83,33 210,00 P 12 30,00 36,67 33,33 50,00 36,67 50,00 83,33 213,33 P 21 43,33 43,33 53,33 43,33 56,67 56,67 76,67 216,67 P 22 50,00 50,00 56,67 46,67 40,00 60,00 66,67 206,67 P 31 40,00 43,33 53,33 60,00 56,67 56,67 76,67 266,67 P 32 43,33 46,67 50,00 53,33 40,00 53,33 90,00 290,00 Rataan 42,22 43,33 49,44 51,67 46,11 55,56 79,44 233,89
16. Tabel Rataan pertambahan bobot badan induk rusa perlakuan selama masa kebuntingan (g/ekor/hari)
Perlakuan Kelompok Total
1 2
P1 71,08 65,31 136,39
P2 72,24 70,61 142,86
P3 80,00 81,97 161,97
17. Tabel Konversi pakan induk rusa setiap bulan kebuntingan
Perlakuan Konversi/bulan kebuntingan
I II III IV V VI VII VIII
P 11 53,44 60,86 49,67 44,39 53,71 45,60 31,30 12,62 P 12 88,49 78,06 83,52 56,79 78,50 57,24 35,28 13,99 P 21 45,26 48,63 38,37 48,06 37,23 37,01 28,25 10,14 P 22 57,16 61,46 52,74 65,26 76,84 50,84 46,97 15,32 P 31 68,25 64,67 53,23 47,33 51,60 52,12 39,02 11,27 P 32 76,58 76,72 69,62 66,37 89,72 66,80 40,55 12,73 Rataan 64,86 65,07 57,86 54,70 64,60 51,60 36,89 12,68 18. Tabel Rataan konversi pakan perlakuan induk rusa
Perlakuan Kelompok Total
1 2
P1 43,95 61,48 105,43
P2 36,62 53,32 89,94
P3 48,43 62,39 110,82
Rataan 43,00 59,06 102,06
19. Tabel Rataan lama kebuntingan selama penimbangan (hari)
Perlakuan Bulan (Hari) lama waktu ke
I II III IV V VI VII VIII
P 11 35 30 31 31 29 31 31 31 P 12 27 35 30 31 31 29 31 31 P 21 27 35 30 31 31 29 31 31 P 22 27 35 30 31 31 29 31 31 P 31 27 35 30 31 31 29 31 31 P 32 30 31 31 29 31 31 31 30
20. Tabel Rataan Morfometri Anak
Perlakuan Jenis kelamin Bobot lahir anak (g) Tinggi badan (cm) Panjang badan (cm) L P11 JANTAN 5.200 42,50 59,00 P12 BETINA 6.100 44,00 62,00 P21 JANTAN 4.900 42,00 57,00 P22 JANTAN 6.000 43,00 55,00 P31 JANTAN 7.400 50,00 69,00 P32 JANTAN 6.500 46,00 60,00
21. Tabel Rataan Persentase bobot lahir terhadap bobot induk
Perlakuan Kelompok Total Rataan
1 2
p1 6,52 6,70 12,80 6,61
p2 6,98 6,32 13,3 6,65
p3 6,49 6,91 13,4 6,70
Rataan 6,52 6,64 13,17 6,58
23. Tabel Rataan bobot lahir terhadap bobot induk
Perlakuan Kelompok Total
1 2
p1 5.200,00 6.100,00 11.300,00
p2 4.900,00 6.000,00 10.900,00
p3 7.400,00 6.500,00 13.900,00
B. Lampiran analisis Statistik menggunakan Program SAS (Statistical Analysys System)
Lampiran 1.
KONSUMSI HIJAUN (BK) TRIWULAN I SAS System
GLM Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values PERLAKUAN 3 1 2 3 KELOMPOK 2 1 2 Number of Observations Read 6 Number of Observations Used 6 GLM Procedure
Dependent Variable: KONSUMSI Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 3 230632.0483 76877.3494 0.41 0.7636 Error 2 372554.5606 186277.2803
Corrected Total 5 603186.6089
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE KONSUMSI Mean 0.382356 21.25822 431.5985 2030.267
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 23021.8593 23021.8593 0.12 0.7588 PERLAKUAN 2 207610.1890 103805.0945 0.56 0.6422 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 23021.8593 23021.8593 0.12 0.7588 PERLAKUAN 2 207610.1890 103805.0945 0.56 0.6422 GLM Procedure
t Tests (LSD) for KONSUMSI
NOTE: This test controls Type I comparisonwise error rate, not experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 2 Error Mean Square 186277.3 Critical Value of t 4.30265 Least Significant Difference 1857
Means with same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN A 2291.6 2 3 A A 1925.7 2 1 A A 1873.5 2 2
Lampiran 2.
KONSUMSI HIJAUAN (BK) TRIWULAN II SAS System
GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: KONSUMSI Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 3 306364.7413 102121.5804 0.60 0.6744 Error 2 340917.7664 170458.8832
Corrected Total 5 647282.5077
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE KONSUMSI Mean 0.473309 19.85899 412.8667 2078.992
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 36953.0928 36953.0928 0.22 0.6873 PERLAKUAN 2 269411.6484 134705.8242 0.79 0.5586 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 36953.0928 36953.0928 0.22 0.6873 PERLAKUAN 2 269411.6484 134705.8242 0.79 0.5586 GLM Procedure
t Tests (LSD) for KONSUMSI
NOTE: This test controls Type I comparisonwise error rate, not experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 2 Error Mean Square 170458.9 Critical Value of t 4.30265 Least Significant Difference 1776.4 Means with same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN A 2375.8 2 3
A
A 1966.5 2 1 A
Lampiran 3.
KONSUMSI HIJAUAN (BK) TRIWULAN III SAS System
GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: KONSUMSI Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 3 286331.5779 95443.8593 0.77 0.6060 Error 2 246449.9366 123224.9683
Corrected Total 5 532781.5146
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE KONSUMSI Mean 0.537428 16.57146 351.0341 2118.305
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 77377.5128 77377.5128 0.63 0.5112 PERLAKUAN 2 208954.0651 104477.0326 0.85 0.5412 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 77377.5128 77377.5128 0.63 0.5112 PERLAKUAN 2 208954.0651 104477.0326 0.85 0.5412 GLM Procedure
t Tests (LSD) for KONSUMSI
NOTE: This test controls Type I comparisonwise error rate, not experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 2 Error Mean Square 123225 Critical Value of t 4.30265 Least Significant Difference 1510.4 Means with same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN A 2374.3 2 3
A
A 2046.0 2 1 A
Lampiran 4.
KONSUMSI KONSENTRAT (BK) TRIWULAN I SAS System
GLM Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values PERLAKUAN 3 1 2 3 KELOMPOK 2 1 2 Number of Observations Read 6 Number of Observations Used 6 SAS System
GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: KONSUMSI Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 3 38326.64183 12775.54728 0.42 0.7616 Error 2 61364.20890 30682.10445
Corrected Total 5 99690.85073
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE KONSUMSI Mean 0.384455 23.46950 175.1631 746.3433
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 2755.46940 2755.46940 0.09 0.7927 PERLAKUAN 2 35571.17243 17785.58622 0.58 0.6330 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 2755.46940 2755.46940 0.09 0.7927 PERLAKUAN 2 35571.17243 17785.58622 0.58 0.6330 GLM Procedure
t Tests (LSD) for KONSUMSI
NOTE: This test controls Type I comparisonwise error rate, not experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 2 Error Mean Square 30682.1 Critical Value of t 4.30265 Least Significant Difference 753.67
Means with same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN A 851.6 2 3
A
A 717.7 2 1 A
Lampiran 5.
KONSUMSI KONSENTRAT (BK) TRIWULAN II SAS System
GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: KONSUMSI Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 3 48651.3947 16217.1316 0.60 0.6757 Error 2 54422.4542 27211.2271
Corrected Total 5 103073.8489
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE KONSUMSI Mean 0.472005 21.53877 164.9583 765.8667
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 5759.80167 5759.80167 0.21 0.6906 PERLAKUAN 2 42891.59303 21445.79652 0.79 0.5592 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 5759.80167 5759.80167 0.21 0.6906 PERLAKUAN 2 42891.59303 21445.79652 0.79 0.5592 GLM Procedure
t Tests (LSD) for KONSUMSI
NOTE: This test controls Type I comparisonwise error rate, not experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 2 Error Mean Square 27211.23 Critical Value of t 4.30265 Least Significant Difference 709.76 Means with same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN A 884.6 2 3
A
A 718.5 2 1 A
Lampiran 6.
KONSUMSI KONSENTRAT (BK) TRIWULAN III SAS System
GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: KONSUMSI Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 3 52705.07655 17568.35885 0.82 0.5901 Error 2 42809.69373 21404.84687
Corrected Total 5 95514.77028
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE KONSUMSI Mean 0.551800 17.91276 146.3040 816.7583
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 5769.10042 5769.10042 0.27 0.6554 PERLAKUAN 2 46935.97613 23467.98807 1.10 0.4770 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 5769.10042 5769.10042 0.27 0.6554 PERLAKUAN 2 46935.97613 23467.98807 1.10 0.4770 GLM Procedure
t Tests (LSD) for KONSUMSI
NOTE: This test controls Type I comparisonwise error rate, not experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 2 Error Mean Square 21404.85 Critical Value of t 4.30265 Least Significant Difference 629.5
Means with same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN A 939.4 2 3 A A 776.7 2 1 A A 734.2 2 2
Lampiran 7.
KONSUMSI TOTAL HIJAUAN DAN KONSENTRAT(BK) TRIWULAN I SAS System
GLM Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values PERLAKUAN 3 1 2 3 KELOMPOK 2 1 2 Number of Observations Read 6 Number of Observations Used 6 GLM Procedure
Dependent Variable: KONSUMSI Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 3 415203.687 138401.229 0.41 0.7675 Error 2 682896.091 341448.045
Corrected Total 5 1098099.778
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE KONSUMSI Mean 0.378111 21.73665 584.3356 2688.250
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 39677.6544 39677.6544 0.12 0.7657 PERLAKUAN 2 375526.0327 187763.0163 0.55 0.6452 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 39677.6544 39677.6544 0.12 0.7657 PERLAKUAN 2 375526.0327 187763.0163 0.55 0.6452 GLM Procedure
t Tests (LSD) for KONSUMSI
NOTE: This test controls Type I comparisonwise error rate, not experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 2 Error Mean Square 341448 Critical Value of t 4.30265 Least Significant Difference 2514.2
Means with same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN A 3036.4 2 3
A
A 2568.5 2 1 A
Lampiran 8.
KONSUMSI HIJAUAN DAN KONSENTRAT (BK) TRIWULAN II SAS System
GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: KONSUMSI Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 3 547090.981 182363.660 0.59 0.6783 Error 2 618150.331 309075.166
Corrected Total 5 1165241.312
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE KONSUMSI Mean 0.469509 20.18720 555.9453 2753.950
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 67526.2851 67526.2851 0.22 0.6862 PERLAKUAN 2 479564.6961 239782.3481 0.78 0.5631 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 67526.2851 67526.2851 0.22 0.6862 PERLAKUAN 2 479564.6961 239782.3481 0.78 0.5631 GLM Procedure
t Tests (LSD) for KONSUMSI
NOTE: This test controls Type I comparisonwise error rate, not experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 2 Error Mean Square 309075.2 Critical Value of t 4.30265 Least Significant Difference 2392
Means with same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN A 3149.0 2 3
A
A 2610.0 2 1 A
Lampiran 9.
KONSUMSI HIJAUAN DAN KONSENTRAT(BK) TRIWULAN III SAS System
GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: KONSUMSI Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 3 608876.669 202958.890 0.71 0.6304 Error 2 573377.473 286688.736
Corrected Total 5 1182254.141
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE KONSUMSI Mean 0.515013 18.69347 535.4332 2864.280
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 79331.6011 79331.6011 0.28 0.6514 PERLAKUAN 2 529545.0675 264772.5338 0.92 0.5199 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 79331.6011 79331.6011 0.28 0.6514 PERLAKUAN 2 529545.0675 264772.5338 0.92 0.5199 GLM Procedure
t Tests (LSD) for KONSUMSI
NOTE: This test controls Type I comparisonwise error rate, not experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 2 Error Mean Square 286688.7 Critical Value of t 4.30265 Least Significant Difference 2303.8 Means with same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN A 3273.6 2 3
A
A 2741.6 2 1 A
Lampiran 10.
ANALISIS TRIWULAN I SAS System
GLM Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values PERLAKUAN 3 1 2 3 KELOMPOK 2 1 2 Number of Observations Read 6 Number of Observations Used 6 GLM Procedure
Dependent Variable: PBB Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 3 75.9648333 25.3216111 0.74 0.6185 Error 2 68.4427000 34.2213500
Corrected Total 5 144.4075333
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE PBB Mean 0.526045 13.75908 5.849902 42.51667
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 2.85660000 2.85660000 0.08 0.7998 PERLAKUAN 2 73.10823333 36.55411667 1.07 0.4835 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 2.85660000 2.85660000 0.08 0.7998 PERLAKUAN 2 73.10823333 36.55411667 1.07 0.4835 GLM Procedure
t Tests (LSD) for PBB
NOTE: This test controls Type I comparisonwise error rate, not experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 2 Error Mean Square 34.22135 Critical Value of t 4.30265 Least Significant Difference 25.17
Means with same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN A 45.910 2 2
A
A 43.925 2 3 A
Lampiran 11. PBB TRIWULAN II SAS System GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: PBB Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 3 45.63156667 15.21052222 0.89 0.5669 Error 2 34.08743333 17.04371667
Corrected Total 5 79.71900000
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE PBB Mean 0.572405 8.861137 4.128404 46.59000
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 31.09926667 31.09926667 1.82 0.3093 PERLAKUAN 2 14.53230000 7.26615000 0.43 0.7011 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 31.09926667 31.09926667 1.82 0.3093 PERLAKUAN 2 14.53230000 7.26615000 0.43 0.7011 t Tests (LSD) for PBB
NOTE: This test controls Type I comparisonwise error rate, not experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 2 Error Mean Square 17.04372 Critical Value of t 4.30265 Least Significant Difference 17.763 Means with same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN A 48.300 2 2
A
A 46.935 2 3 A
Lampiran 12. PBB TRIWULAN III SAS System GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: PBB Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 3 1405.492967 468.497656 17.24 0.0553 Error 2 54.347233 27.173617
Corrected Total 5 1459.840200
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE PBB Mean 0.962772 4.211028 5.212832 123.7900
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 1.197067 1.197067 0.04 0.8532 PERLAKUAN 2 1404.295900 702.147950 25.84 0.0373 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 1.197067 1.197067 0.04 0.8532 PERLAKUAN 2 1404.295900 702.147950 25.84 0.0373 GLM Procedure
t Tests (LSD) for PBB
NOTE: This test controls Type I comparisonwise error rate, not experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 2 Error Mean Square 27.17362 Critical Value of t 4.30265 Least Significant Difference 22.429
Means with same letter are not significantly different.
t Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN A 145.280 2 3
B 115.215 2 1 B
B 110.875 2 2
Lampiran 13.
KONVERSI TRIWULAN I SAS System
GLM Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values PERLAKUAN 3 1 2 3 KELOMPOK 2 1 2 Number of Observations Read 6 Number of Observations Used 6 GLM Procedure
Dependent Variable: KONVERSI Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 3 555.3980500 185.1326833 1.10 0.5082 Error 2 336.0427000 168.0213500
Corrected Total 5 891.4407500
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE KONVERSI Mean 0.623034 19.95275 12.96230 64.96500
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 133.3873500 133.3873500 0.79 0.4669 PERLAKUAN 2 422.0107000 211.0053500 1.26 0.4433
Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 133.3873500 133.3873500 0.79 0.4669 PERLAKUAN 2 422.0107000 211.0053500 1.26 0.4433 GLM Procedure
t Tests (LSD) for KONVERSI
NOTE: This test controls Type I comparisonwise error rate, not experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 2 Error Mean Square 168.0214 Critical Value of t 4.30265 Least Significant Difference 55.772 Means with same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N PERLAKUAN A 71.56 2 3
A
A 70.21 2 1 A
Lampiran 14.
KONVERSI TRIWULAN II SAS System
GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: KONVERSI Sum of
Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 3 197.8609833 65.9536611 0.17 0.9083 Error 2 775.2171000 387.6085500
Corrected Total 5 973.0780833
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE KONVERSI Mean 0.203335 33.33992 19.68778 59.05167
Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 87.3253500 87.3253500 0.23 0.6818 PERLAKUAN 2 110.5356333 55.2678167 0.14 0.8752 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F KELOMPOK 1 87.3253500 87.3253500 0.23 0.6818 PERLAKUAN 2 110.5356333 55.2678167 0.14 0.8752 GLM Procedure
t Tests (LSD) for KONVERSI
NOTE: This test controls Type I comparisonwise error rate, not experimentwise error rate.
Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 2 Error Mean Square 387.6086 Critical Value of t 4.30265 Least Significant Difference 84.71
Means with same letter are not significantly different.