• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

CHAPTER 4: FINDING AND DISCUSSION

B. Discussion

This research found that in the adverb phrase of place section there were 5 student who got Excellent category with a range score of 80-100 and then there were 2 student who got a good category with an interval value of 60-79, then there was 1 student who enters the poor category with an interval value of 40-49 and finally there were 3 students who fall into the very poor category with an interval value of ≤ 39 while in the adverb phrase of time section there was 1 student who got Excellent category with a interval score of 80-100 then there was 1 student who got a good category with an interval value of 60-79, then there were 2 students in the poor category with an interval value of 40-49 and finally there were 7 students in the less category which are included in the very poor category with an interval value of ≤ 39.

The average value for the adverb phrase of place was 63.64 which is included in the good category, while the average value for the adverb phrase of time was 23.63 which is included in the very poor category.

Based on the research data above, it can be concluded that the ability of students to use adverbs of place in writing English is good because based on the average score of students was 63.64. It is indicated that most of the students are good and very good category. There are only 4 students who got lower category namely poor and very poor, while none of the students is in medium category. Based on the research data above, it can be concluded that the ability of students to use adverbs of time in writing English is very poor because based on the average score of students was 23.63. This is evidenced because most of the students are in the very poor and poor category and there were only 2 students. Who get good grades, while none of the others is in mediocre category? Therefore, it can be seen that the skills possessed by students in writing adverb phrases of time were very poor. The reason why students use the adverb phrase of place more than the adverb phrase of time is because students often encounter adverb of place in textbooks and then students find it easier to use adverb of place so that students are more familiar and this becomes students' initial knowledge in writing adverb phrase of place rather than adverb phrase of time.

Based on the score category from the Sari (2018) thesis, it states that if students get 80-100 then it can be said to be an excellent category, if students

32

get 60-79 then it can be said to be a good category, if students get 50-59 then it can be said to be a fair category, if students get 40-49, it can be said to be in a poor category and less than 39, a student is said to be in a very poor category. Based on research conducted by researcher, it was found that the use of place adverb phrases was used more often and the average value was also always used instead of time adverb phrases. This in line with Poai (2015) the study where results showed that the sixth semester students of Sintuwu Maroso University's English Education Study program utilized 191 adverbs in their writing text throughout the academic year 2013/2014. Adverbs of manner accounted for 68, adverbs of location for 62, adverbs of time for 5, adverbs of frequency for 25, adverbs of degrees for 29, and adverbs that made a statement for two. Adverbs of manner accounted for 68, adverbs of place for 62, adverbs of time for 5, adverbs of frequency for 25, adverbs of degree for 29, and adverbs that made a statement for 29. There were 27 students who served as data sources. Meanwhile, Budiyono et al (2016) the dominant type of phrase found in news texts is adverb phrase with a total of 64.4% of the 407-phrase text. (2) Profile of the types of phrases produced by fourth semester students, there are several types of adverb phrases in student news items, namely adverb of place, adverb of time, adverb of manner, and adverb of frequency. The most dominant type of adverb phrase in the students' news item text is adverb of place.

32

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

In this chapter, the researcher would like to provide some conclusion and suggestions based on the previous chapter.

A. Conclusion

Based on the research problems, the researcher can conclude that the students’ ability on the use of adverb phrase in writing English text in class XI SMA Muhammadiyah 3 Makassar is good . Researcher found several results as follow:

1. The researcher found that the mean score adverb phrase of place was 63.64 which is in the range good category. It means that students’ used more adverb phrase of place than adverb phrase of time in making sentences in writing recount text.

2. The average obtained in the adverb phrase of time was 23.63 and it included in the very poor category. It can be seen that the value of the adverb phrase of place always used instead of the adverb phrase of time in writing sentences in recount text.

B. Suggestion

Based on the conclusions and implications of the aforementioned research, the researcher would like to give some suggestions to the people who will benefit from the research.

33

1. Students of class XI IPA SMA 3 MAakassar should improve their mastery in learning English, especially in finding adverbs in writing and students repeating the material after the teacher teaches it in class and students repeat it at home.

2. It is suggested to the English teacher, especially the eighth-grade English teacher, to make sure the students make sure that they

3. understand well about all the adverb phrases. The more students do the exercises, the more they understand about adverb phrases and apply appropriate strategies, methods, methods, or procedures that can improve or assist students in understanding English, especially about adverb phrases in writing English text

4. It is important for other researchers to conduct in-depth research with the same research topic, especially for higher levels with other types of adverb phrases.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Arikunto,S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto,S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.

Asriati, St.& Hajaruddin A. (2017). Improving the students’ Writing Skill by Using Process Writing Approach at the Second Grade Students of SMK Grafika Gowa Makassar. English Education Department, Vol 2(2): 224-244.

Ba’dulu, A. M. (2008). English Syntax. Makassar: the UNM Publisher.

Bahri, Saiful.Bambang, Sugeng. (2009). Difficulties in Writing in Vocabulary and Grammar of the second year students of SMPN 1 Selong East Lombok West Nusa Tenggara in The School Year 2008/2009.

Budiyono, Slamet (2016) An Analysis of the Noun and Adverbial Phrases of the Students’ News Item Texts (A study of the Fourth Semester Students of English Education Department). Another thesis, Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan.

Coghill, Jeffrey And Stacy Magendanz. (2003). English Grammar. New York: Wiley Publishing, Inc.Comprehension Achievement at the Ninth Grade Students of SMPN 36 Makassar. and Demons Novel and by Ingrid Dwijani Nimpoeno (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).

Emmaryana, F. (2010). An Analysis on the grammatical errors in the students writing: a Case study of the first students of sma negeri 1 cigudeg-bogor.

Hacini, H., Loucif, S., & Benyahia, A. (2019). A corpus-based study of the use of adverbs in EFL learners’ writings investigating problems and suggesting Solutions.

Harmer, Jeremy. (2004). How to Teach Writing, Longman: Pearson Education

Hermawan, H. 2016. The Effectiveness of Using Webquest Model on Students’

Reading.

Hyland, Ken. (2004). Genre and Second Language Writing. London: The University of Michigan Press.

Kasiram, Mohammad. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif-Kualitatif. Malang: UIN Malang Press

.

Langan, John. (2005). College writing skills with reading. Sixt edition, New York:

McGrow Hill.

Nurgiantoro. (2001). Menulis Merupakan Keterampilan Berbahasa. (Jakarta:

Gramedia).

Nzama, M. V. (2010). Error Analysis: A Study of Errors Committed by Isizulu Speaking Learners of English in Selected School.

Poai, S. T. Students’mastery in Using Adverbs At English Study Program Of Sintuwu Maroso University.

Pranoto. (2004). Mengajar Menulis Fiksi untuk Para Guru. Jakarta: Wisma

Sari, R. D. (2018). Analysis Of Students’ Ability In Using Adverbial Clauses In Writing Complex Sentences: A Case Study At The Fifth Semester Of English Education Department Fkip University Of Mataram In Academic Year 2017/2018”.

Sitompul, J. M., Purba, R., Simanjuntak, S. M., & Sitorus, E. (2021). The Students’

Ability on Identifying Adverbs in Writing Descriptive Text. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 4(2), 362-374.

Sitorus, G. S., & Sipayung, K. (2018). An Error Analysis of Using Phrases in Writing Recount Text at Tenth Grade in SMA Parulian 2 Medan. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, 18(1), 79-88.

Swan, Michael. (2005). Practical English Usage: 3rd Edition. Oxford University Press.

Wijayanti, I. (2016). The Use of Phrases in Writing Descriptive Text by the Students of SMA Negeri 1 Boyolali In 2015/2016 Academic Year (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).

Yalmiadi, Jufrizal, & Hamzah (2013). Student’s Ability in Using Lexical Collaction in Descriptive Writing at the English Departement of Padang State Polytechnic. Journal English Language Teaching (ELT). Vol 1(1): 13-23.

Za'in, D. L. (2017). An Investigation of Students’problem in Writing Recount Text at the First Semester of The Eighth Grade of Smpn 4 Bandar Lampung in the Academic Year of 2016/2017 (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Raden Intan Lampung).

A P E N D I C E

S

Writing Test Writing Test

1. Petunjuk pengisian:

a. Hasil tes ini tidak akan mempengaruhi nilai saudara (i) dalam mata pelajaran Bahasa Inggris, karena hasil tes ini hanya semata-mata untuk kepentingan penelitian.

b. Atas partisipasi dan kerja sama peneliti mengucapkan banyak terima kasih.

c. Isitilah identitas anda sesuai dengan petunjuk yang telah disediakan!

d. Kerjakanlah tes ini dengan sebaik-baiknya!

e. Waktu untuk mengerjakan tes ini selama 2 hari di karenakan suasana dan kondisi saat ini.

f. Selamat mengerjakan.

2. Buatlah karangan dengan mengunakan frase kata keterangan tempat 5 dan frase keterangan waktu 5 didalam tulisan paragraf anda serta sesuaikan dengan petunjuk sebagai berikut :

a. Topic: 1. your experiences about covid 19

2. your experiences about study from home b. Jumlah: Minimal 3 Paragraf

Waktu 2 hari.

Adverb phrase of place

No Shadow name Correct Score Category

1 GA  I just stay at home

 Doing daily activities at home

40 Poor

at school

 It was very difficult for me to enter a shopping store

5 ML  I live in Makassar

 Would go to the bathroom

 When I have ingredients at home

 I must went to the mosque

 Students are encouraged to study from home

80 Excellent

10 PM  While I am at home

 I clean the house

60 Good

 I thought I used to study at home

11 FAS  So, I also urge you to stay at home

20 Very poor

Adverb phrase of time

No Shadow name Correct Score Category

1 GA - 0 Very poor

2 MB  Already 15.50 PM 20 Very poor

3 AH  For 2 weeks

 Murojnah my memorization

partiapating in one week

40 Poor

4 MK - 0 Very poor

5 ML  I always wake up in the morning

 I usually do it until 12/13 pm

80 Excellent

 Towards the usual

11 FAS 0 Very poor

The student’s calculation of adverb phrase of place

PM =3

The student’s calculation of adverb phrase of time 1. Scoring =𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡

MZH =3

5𝑥100 = 60 9. Scoring =𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡

𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑥100 MZ =0

5𝑥100 = 0

10. Scoring =𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑥100 PM =1

5𝑥100 = 20 11. Scoring =𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡

𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑥100 FAS =0

5𝑥100 = 0

STUDENTS WORK Student 1

Student 2

Student 3

Student 4

Student 5

P

E

R

S

U

R

A

T

A

N

PRODI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS

It is our pleasure to inform you that, after reviewing your paper:

STUDENTS’ ABILITY TO USE ADVERB PHRASE IN WRITING ENGLISH TEXT (A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY AT SMA MUHAMMADIYAH 3

MAKASSAR)

The manuscript ID: 641 Detail checklist:

Checkpoint Yes No

The author has sent the manuscript by using the institutional email the author has submitted the manuscript through the open journal system (OJS)

The manuscript according to the limitations or description of the journal

LoCT has been submitted by the author

The manuscript has followed the existing templates

The article processing charge (APC) has been submitted by the author

has been ACCEPTED to publish with Journal of Language Teaching and Assessment, ISSN (online) 2809-5707. ISSN (printed) 2810-0468 . We appreciate your contribution.

We will let you know if you must make any modification as the reviewer’s comments. Once your manuscript is moved to publishing, our production editor will inform you. Please feel free to email us with any questions at

Dr. Ummi Khaerati Syam, S.Pd., M.Pd.

NBM. 977 807

CURRICULUM VITAE

Yeyen Nur Indah Sari was born in Limbung, on 9 September 1998. She is the eldest of two children. Her parents are Jumangin Effendi and Musdalifah. She started his education at SD Negeri Limbung Putri and graduated in 2010. In the same year, she entered at SMP Negeri 1 Bajeng and graduated in 2013. After graduating from SMP, she started her studies at SMA Negeri 1 Bajeng. 2016. In the same year, she continued her studies at the Muhammadiyah University of Makassar as a student majoring in English, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education. At the end of her studies, she can complete his thesis with the title Students’ Ability to Use of Adverb Phrase in Writing English Text (A Descriptive Study at SMA Muhammadiyah 3 Makassar) In 2022.

Dokumen terkait