BAB V KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN
C. Saran
Setelah melakukan penelitian tentang analisis kualitas soal pilihan ganda Ulangan Tengah Semester II mata pelajaran matematika kelas 1 saran yang diberikan peneliti sebagai berikut.
1. Penelitian sejenis lanjutan diharapkah dapat lebih lengkap dalam pengumpulan datanya, seperti melakukan observasi terhadap RPP maupun kisi-kisi dan melakukan obervasi ketika tes ini diujikan. Ketika membuat soal seharusnya teknik penyusunan soal benar-benar diperhatikan. Jika ada satu langkah yang tidak dilakukan soal yang diujikan dapat tidak valid (ditinjau dari validitas isi). Program studi PGSD ada baiknya untuk lebih memperbanyak latihan membuat soal, karena pembuat soal adalah guru. Program studi PGSD adalah program studi yang menghasilkan guru, sehingga jika mahasiswa sudah terjun ke lapangan dan menjadi seorang guru, nantinya bisa membuat soal yang berkualitas.
2. Penelitian selanjutnya sampel yang diambil harus dapat mewakili populasi Sekolah Dasar di Yogyakarta atau di daerah lain.
70
DAFTAR REFERENSI
Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Bagus. (2011). Analisis Butir Soal Tes Ulangan Akhir Semester IPS Terpadu Buatan MGMP IPS Kabupaten Gianyar Kelas VII Semester I Tahun Pelajaran 2011-2012. Jurnal
Basuki, P. (2014). Asesmen Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2006). Standar Isi. Jakarta: Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Christensen, J. (2012). Educational Research. Burke: SAGE Publiser Inc.
Depdiknas. (2008). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Dikmenum Depdiknas.
Purwanto. (2009). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Griffin, P. (1991). Educational Assessment and Reporting: A News Apporach.
Sydney: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Gunawan, H. (2014, Maret). Diunduh April Selasa, 2014, dari http://www.bincangedukasi.com/peringkat-nilai-un-dan-ipk/.
Hasan. (2009). Pokok-Pokok Materi Statistik 1 (Statistik Deskriptif). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Hamzah, A. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kunandar, D. (2014). Penilaian Autentik. Jakarta: Rajawali.
Lewis, M. (2002). TAP (Test Analysis Program): User's Guide. Diunduh 22 April dari http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~brooksg/tap.htm
Muslich, M. (2011). Authentic Assessment : Penilaian Berbasis Kelas dan Kompetensi. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Purnomo. (2006). Kemampuan Guru Dalam Merancang Tes Berbentuk Pilihan Ganda Pada Mata Pelajaran IPS Untuk Ujian Akhir Sekolah (UAS). Jurnal. Rosyid. (2014, Maret). Diunduh April Selasa, 2014, dari
http://www.bincangedukasi.com/prestasi-belajar/.
Sukardi. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sukardi. (2008). Evaluasi Pendidikan Prinsip & Operasionalnya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Suprananta. (2012). Pengukuran Dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu Suwandi. (2010). Model Assesmen Dalam Pembelajaran. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.
Sanders, D. (1990). Statistic: A Fresh Approach. United States: McGraw-Hill Inc. Sandtrock, J. (2007). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Setiawan. (2008). Prinsip-Prinsip Penilaian Pembelajaran Matematika SMA.
Yogyakarta: PPPPTK Matematika Depdiknas.
Silverius, S. (1991). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar dan Umpan Balik. Jakarta: Grasindo. Stufflebeam, D. (1985). Sistematic Evaluation. Boston: Kluwernijhoff Publishing. Sudjana, D. (2010). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja
Sugiono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D.
Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumiarsih. (2012). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Tes Ulangan Tengah Semester Genap Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Siswa Kelas 3 Minegeri Jejeran Bantul Yogyakarta Tahun Ajaran 2011/2012. Jurnal.
Suprananto, K. (2012). Pengukuran dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Suraprana, D. (2009). Analisis, Validitas, Reliabilitas, Dan Interpretasi Hasil Tes.
Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
To, K. (1995). Anates versi 2.5. Program Komputer Khusus Untuk Analisis Tes Obyektif dan Uraian. Bandung: FIP IKIP Bandung.
Tukiran, T. (2011). Penelitian Kuantitatif: Sebuah Pengantar. Bandung: Alfabeta. Wardhani, S. (2008). Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: PPPPTK
Matematika.
Wijaya, A. (2010). Penyusunan Tes Pilihan Ganda Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta: PPPPTK Matematika.
Winarti. (2010). Identifying Validity Issues in Indonesian Language Section of The National Examination: A Preliminary Study. Jurnal
Yayasan Kanisius. (2014). Soal Ulangan Tengah Semester Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Kanisius.
LAMPIRAN
SKRIPSI
Lampiran 1 TITLE: kelas 1 COMMENT: matematika ****************************************************************** ********* Examinee Analysis ****************************************************************** *********
Total Ltr ~68% C.I. ~95% C.I. ID Score Percent Grade (Raw Score) (Raw Score) --- --- --- --- --- --- student1 5 50.00% ( 3.9- 6.1) ( 2.8- 7.2) student2 5 50.00% ( 3.9- 6.1) ( 2.8- 7.2) student3 10 100.00% ( 8.9- 10.0) ( 7.8- 10.0) student4 7 70.00% ( 5.9- 8.1) ( 4.8- 9.2) student5 8 80.00% ( 6.9- 9.1) ( 5.8- 10.0) student6 8 80.00% ( 6.9- 9.1) ( 5.8- 10.0) student7 8 80.00% ( 6.9- 9.1) ( 5.8- 10.0) student8 9 90.00% ( 7.9- 10.0) ( 6.8- 10.0) student9 8 80.00% ( 6.9- 9.1) ( 5.8- 10.0) student10 9 90.00% ( 7.9- 10.0) ( 6.8- 10.0) student11 8 80.00% ( 6.9- 9.1) ( 5.8- 10.0) student12 10 100.00% ( 8.9- 10.0) ( 7.8- 10.0) student13 7 70.00% ( 5.9- 8.1) ( 4.8- 9.2) student14 7 70.00% ( 5.9- 8.1) ( 4.8- 9.2) student15 6 60.00% ( 4.9- 7.1) ( 3.8- 8.2) student16 5 50.00% ( 3.9- 6.1) ( 2.8- 7.2) student17 9 90.00% ( 7.9- 10.0) ( 6.8- 10.0) student18 8 80.00% ( 6.9- 9.1) ( 5.8- 10.0) student19 8 80.00% ( 6.9- 9.1) ( 5.8- 10.0) student20 7 70.00% ( 5.9- 8.1) ( 4.8- 9.2) student21 7 70.00% ( 5.9- 8.1) ( 4.8- 9.2) student22 8 80.00% ( 6.9- 9.1) ( 5.8- 10.0) student23 8 80.00% ( 6.9- 9.1) ( 5.8- 10.0) student24 7 70.00% ( 5.9- 8.1) ( 4.8- 9.2) student25 9 90.00% ( 7.9- 10.0) ( 6.8- 10.0) student26 7 70.00% ( 5.9- 8.1) ( 4.8- 9.2) ================================================================== ========
These results have not been sorted (see data editor)
================================================================== ========
Number of Examinees = 26 Total Possible Score= 10
Minimum Score = 5.000 = 50.0% Maximum Score = 10.000 = 100.0% Median Score = 8.000 = 80.0% Mean Score = 7.615 = 76.2% Standard Deviation = 1.332 Variance = 1.775 Skewness = -0.346 Kurtosis = -0.220
=============== Frequency Table ===============
Z Rel. Cum. Cum. Percentile Normalized
Score Score Freq. Freq. Freq. Percent Rank Stanine Zn Score --- 5 -1.96 3 0.115 3 11.54 5.8 2 -1.57 6 -1.21 1 0.038 4 15.38 13.5 3 -1.10 7 -0.46 7 0.269 11 42.31 28.8 4 -0.55 8 0.29 9 0.346 20 76.92 59.6 6 0.24 9 1.04 4 0.154 24 92.31 84.6 7 1.02 10 1.79 2 0.077 26 100.00 96.2 9 1.76 ===== ===== Totals: 26 1.000 ========= Bar Graph =========
Score Count Graph (each @ represents 1 case) --- --- --- 5.00 3 @@@ 6.00 1 @ 7.00 7 @@@@@@@ 8.00 9 @@@@@@@@@ 9.00 4 @@@@ 10.00 2 @@ ===================== Stem-and-Leaf Display =====================
Stem Leaves (width=10) ---- ---
0 . 555677777778888888889999 1 . 00
Lampiran 2
TITLE: kelas 1 COMMENT: matematika
****************************************************************** *********
Item and Test Analysis
****************************************************************** *********
Number Item Disc. # Correct # Correct Point Adj.
Item Key Correct Diff. Index in High Grp in Low Grp Biser. Pt Bis --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- Item 01 (2 )# 26 1.00 0.00 15 (1.00) 11 (1.00) **** **** Item 02 (3 )# 26 1.00 0.00 15 (1.00) 11 (1.00) **** **** Item 03 (1 )# 25 0.96 0.09 15 (1.00) 10 (0.91) 0.39 0.26 Item 04 (3 )# 14 0.54 0.15 9 (0.60) 5 (0.45) 0.37 0.00 Item 05 (2 )# 21 0.81 0.14 13 (0.87) 8 (0.73) 0.30 0.00 Item 06 (1 )# 23 0.88 0.12 14 (0.93) 9 (0.82) 0.44 0.22 Item 07 (2 )# 5 0.19 0.33 5 (0.33) 0 (0.00) 0.51 0.24 Item 08 (3 )# 23 0.88 0.27 15 (1.00) 8 (0.73) 0.35 0.11 Item 09 (1 ) 19 0.73 0.48 14 (0.93) 5 (0.45) 0.54 0.24 Item 10 (3 ) 16 0.62 0.59 13 (0.87) 3 (0.27) 0.54 0.21 ================================================================== ========
# marks potential problems (p<0.2 or p>0.9, D<0.2, pbis<0.2, adjpbis<0.2)
These results have been sorted by item number
================================================================== ========
Number of Items Excluded = 0 Number of Items Analyzed = 10 Mean Item Difficulty = 0.762 Mean Item Discrimination = 0.217 Mean Point Biserial = 0.430 Mean Adj. Point Biserial = 0.159 KR20 (Alpha) = 0.339 KR21 = -0.026 SEM (from KR20) = 1.083 # Potential Problem Items = 8 High Grp Min Score (n=15) = 8.000 Low Grp Max Score (n=11) = 7.000
Split-Half (1st/ 2nd) Reliability = -0.105 (with Spearman-Brown = -0.234)
Split-Half (Odd/Even) Reliability = 0.383 (with Spearman-Brown = 0.554)
Minimum Item Diff. = 0.192, Maximum Item Diff. = 1.000 Minimum Disc. Index = 0.000, Maximum Disc. Index = 0.594 Minimum Pt. Biserial = 0.299, Maximum Pt. Biserial = 0.543
To obtain a KR-20 Reliability of .80, the test must be 7.80 times longer,
for a total of 78 items of similar quality to those in the test now.
To obtain a KR-20 Reliability of .90, the test must be 17.56 times longer,
for a total of 176 items of similar quality to those in the test now.
****************************************************************** *********
Additional Item Analysis
****************************************************************** *********
Scale Mean Scale SD KR20 SEM Adjusted
if Item if Item if Item if Item Biserial Biserial
Item Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Correl. Correl. --- - - --- Item 01 6.615 1.332 0.343+ 1.080 ***** ***** Item 02 6.615 1.332 0.343+ 1.080 ***** ***** Item 03 6.654 1.269 0.289 1.070 0.905 0.601 Item 04 7.077 1.238 0.402+ 0.957 0.464 -0.006 Item 05 6.808 1.272 0.375+ 1.006 0.431 0.004 Item 06 6.731 1.227 0.279 1.042 0.719 0.353 Item 07 7.423 1.182 0.257 1.019 0.731 0.343 Item 08 6.731 1.258 0.320 1.037 0.571 0.187 Item 09 6.885 1.154 0.250 1.000 0.726 0.322 Item 10 7.000 1.144 0.267 0.979 0.692 0.264 ================================================================== ========
+ indicates that KR20 (0.339) improves if the item is removed
Mean Biserial Correlation = 0.524 Minimum Biserial Corr. = 0.000 Maximum Biserial Corr. = 0.905
****************************************************************** *********
Answer Key Analysis
****************************************************************** *********
================================== Bar Chart for Correct Answer Usage ==================================
Answer Key Count Graph (each @ represents 1 case) --- --- --- Option 1/A 3 @@@
Option 2/B 3 @@@ Option 3/C 4 @@@@
===================================== Bar Chart for Number of Options Usage =====================================
# Options Count Graph (each @ represents 1 case) --- --- --- 2 Options 0
3 Options 10 @@@@@@@@@@
************************************************************ Item Included, Answer Key, Additional Correct Options
************************************************************ =============== ITEMS INCLUDED: =============== 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 =============== ITEMS EXCLUDED: ===============
No Items were EXCLUDED from the analysis
============================ CORRECT ANSWERS (Item#-Key): ============================
# 1-2 # 2-3 # 3-1 # 4-3 # 5-2 # 6-1 # 7-2 # 8-3 # 9-1 #10-3
Lampiran 3 TITLE: kelas 1 ****************************************************************** ********* Options Analysis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~
Item Frequencies and Percentages -- page1
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~
* is keyed answer, # is option that discriminates better than keyed answer
Item Group Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 ---- --- --- --- --- 1 TOTAL 0 (0.000) 26*(1.000) 0 (0.000) High 0 (0.000) 15 (1.000) 0 (0.000) Low 0 (0.000) 11 (1.000) 0 (0.000) Diff 0 (0.000) 4 (0.000) 0 (0.000) 2 TOTAL 0 (0.000) 0 (0.000) 26*(1.000) High 0 (0.000) 0 (0.000) 15 (1.000) Low 0 (0.000) 0 (0.000) 11 (1.000) Diff 0 (0.000) 0 (0.000) 4 (0.000) 3 TOTAL 25*(0.962) 1 (0.038) 0 (0.000) High 15 (1.000) 0 (0.000) 0 (0.000) Low 10 (0.909) 1 (0.091) 0 (0.000) Diff 5 (0.091) -1(-0.091) 0 (0.000) 4 TOTAL 0 (0.000) 12 (0.462) 14*(0.538) High 0 (0.000) 6 (0.400) 9 (0.600) Low 0 (0.000) 6 (0.545) 5 (0.455) Diff 0 (0.000) 0(-0.145) 4 (0.145) 5 TOTAL 4 (0.154) 21*(0.808) 1 (0.038) High 2 (0.133) 13 (0.867) 0 (0.000) Low 2 (0.182) 8 (0.727) 1 (0.091) Diff 0(-0.048) 5 (0.139) -1(-0.091) 6 TOTAL 23*(0.885) 1 (0.038) 2 (0.077) High 14 (0.933) 0 (0.000) 1 (0.067) Low 9 (0.818) 1 (0.091) 1 (0.091) Diff 5 (0.115) -1(-0.091) 0(-0.024) 7 TOTAL 2 (0.077) 5*(0.192) 19 (0.731) High 2 (0.133) 5 (0.333) 8 (0.533) Low 0 (0.000) 0 (0.000) 11 (1.000) Diff 2 (0.133) 5 (0.333) -3(-0.467)
8 TOTAL 1 (0.038) 2 (0.077) 23*(0.885) High 0 (0.000) 0 (0.000) 15 (1.000) Low 1 (0.091) 2 (0.182) 8 (0.727) Diff -1(-0.091) -2(-0.182) 7 (0.273) 9 TOTAL 19*(0.731) 5 (0.192) 2 (0.077) High 14 (0.933) 1 (0.067) 0 (0.000) Low 5 (0.455) 4 (0.364) 2 (0.182) Diff 9 (0.479) -3(-0.297) -2(-0.182) 10 TOTAL 7 (0.269) 3 (0.115) 16*(0.615) High 1 (0.067) 1 (0.067) 13 (0.867) Low 6 (0.545) 2 (0.182) 3 (0.273) Diff -5(-0.479) -1(-0.115) 10 (0.594)
DAFTAR RIWAYAT HIDUP
Theresia Yogi Wirastri merupakan anak ketiga dari pasangan Tarsisius Paulus Wardi (alm) dan Francisca Tutik Murdiyati. Lahir di Gunung Kidul, 23 Februari 1992. Pendidikan awal dimulai di TK Pembina pada tahun 1997. Penulis melanjutkan pendidikan dasar di SD Kanisius Wonosari pada tahun 1997-2004. Kemudian melanjutkan ke jenjang Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) Negeri 1 Wonosari pada tahun 2004-2007. Pada tahun 2007-2010 penulis melanjutkan pendidikan di Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA) Negeri 1 Wonosari. Tahun 2010 penulis masuk ke Universitas Sanata Dharma (USD), Fakultas keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (FKIP), Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar (PGSD). Selama menempuh pendidikan di sekolah dasar penulis aktif mengikuti beberapa kegiatan seperti pramuka dan kegiatan gereja. Ketika di sekolah menengah pertama penulis akti di organisasi osis, pramuka dan PMR. Ketika di bangku sekolah menengah atas peneliti masih aktif di beberapa organisasi seperti osis, koperasi sekolah, dan PMR. Ketika masuk perguruan tinggi peneliti aktif dalam UKM Pengabdian Masyarakat dan menjadi anggota HMPS PGSD tahun 2010-2012. Peneliti juga aktif mengikuti seminar atau workshop yang dielenggarakan oleh universitas.
