Jumlah Penduduk berdasarkan Umur
D. Peningkatan Sikap Post-Test
7.2 Saran
Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang telah dilaksanakan adapun saran yang ingin disampaikan dari pelaksanaan kajian tugas akhir sebagai berikut:
1. Bagi penulis, perlu adanya kajian lebih lanjut mengenai pembuatan dan penggunaan Biourine sapi yang baik dan benar agar sesuai SNI sehingga dapat dikembangkan untuk penelitian-penelitian selanjutnya sebagai upaya untuk mengurangi penggunaan pupuk anorganik sehingga ada perubahan petani beralih dalam budidaya tanaman yang ramah lingkungan dengan memanfaatkan limbah pertanian.
2. Bagi petani, perlu adanya tindak lanjut melalui pendampingan kepada petani mengenai Penggunaan Biourine sapi dalam berbudidaya tanaman cabai rawit dengan mengolah limbah urine secara optimal
3. Bagi instansi, sebagai wadah dalam penyebarluasan informasi untuk dapat bekerjasama antara petani, penyuluh dan institusi Politeknik
107
Pembangunan Pertanian Malang melalui Kelompok Tani Makroman Sejahtera Desa Makroman Kecamatan Sambutan Kota Samarinda.
108
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Abdurrahman, A., Rusmayadi, G., & Facharuzi, I. (2019). Respon pertumbuhan dan hasil tanaman cabai rawit (Capsicum frutescens L) terhadap pemberian pupuk organik cair (POC) urine sapi sebagai sumber nutrisi pada sistem tetes sederhana. Jurnal Tugas Akhir Mahasiswa, 2(2), 48–55.
Alif S.M., 2017. Kiat Sukses Budidaya Cabai Rawit. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Genesis
Ardiyanto, W., & Jazilah, S. (2019). Pengaruh Macam Pupuk Organik Cair (POC) dan Saat Pemberian terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Produksi Cabai Merah (Capsicum annuum L). Biofarm : Jurnal Ilmiah Pertanian, 14(2).
https://doi.org/10.31941/biofarm.v14i2.792
Aryanti, E., Rahayu, D. N., & others. (2022). Pemberian Pupuk Organik Cair Campuran Kulit Pisang Dan Urine Sapi Terhadap Kandungan N, P Dan K Tanah Gambut. Jurnal Agronida, 8(1), 1–8.
Aslamia. Mardin. Awaluddin Hamzah. 2017. Peran Penyuluh Pertanian Dalam Pengembangan Kelompok Tani Di Kelurahan MataBubu Kecamatan Poasia Kota Kendari. Jurnal Ilmiah Membangun Desa dan Pertanian. vol.2 (1):6-9 ISSN:2527-2748. Jurusan Agribisnis Fakultas Pertanian UHO.
Arinong, A. R., dan C. D. Lasiwua. 2011. Aplikasi Pupuk Organik Cair Terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Produksi Tanaman Sawi. Jurnal Agrisystem, 7 (1): 47-54.
Bahua, Muhamad. 2010. Model Pengembangan Kompetensi. Penyuluhan Pertanian di Provinsi Gorontalo. Jurnal vol.
Bahua, M.I. 2016. Kinerja Penyuluh Pertanian. Deepublish. Yogyakarta.
Budiardana, I. K., Listyowati, andang andiani, & Sumaryanto. (2017). Pengaruh Pemberian Pupuk Organik Cair Dari Fermentasi Urine Sapi Terhadap Pertumbuhan Tanaman Cabe Rawit (Capsicum frutescens L.). Seminar Nasional; Sekolah Tinggi Penyuluhan Pertanian (STPP) Magelang, 152–
160.
Bui, F. Lelang, M, A. Taolin, R,. 2015. Pengaruh Komposisi Media Tanam dan Ukuran Polybag Terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Hasil Tomat (Licopercicum escelentum, Mill). Jurnal Pertanian Konservasi Lahan Kering, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas T r. Savana Cendana Vol. 1 (1) 1-7
Departemen Pertanian. 2006. Undang-Undang No 16 Tahun 2006 Tentang Sistem Penyuluhan Pertanian, Perikanan dan Kehutanan. Jakarta:
Departemen Pertanian RI.
Desiana, C., Banuwa, I. S., Evizal, R., & Yusnaini, S. (2013). Pengaruh Pupuk Organik Cair Urin Sapi Dan Limbah Tahu Terhadap Pertumbuhan Bibit Kakao (Theobroma cacao L.). Jurnal Agrotek Tropika, 1(1), 113–119.
https://doi.org/10.23960/jat.v1i1.1927
109
Descartes, D., Harianto, H., & Falatehan, F. (2021). Penyuluhan Pertanian dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Pendapatan Usahatani di Gapoktan Rorotan Jaya, Rorotan, Cilincing, Provinsi Dki Jakarta. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 5(2), 390–403. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jepa.2021.005.02.10 Endah, Naomi Pratiwi, Bistok Hasiholan Simanjuntak, dan Dina Banjarnahor.
2017. Pengaruh Campuran Media Tanam terhadap Pertumbuhan Tanaman Stroberi (Fragaria vesca L.) sebagai Tanaman Hias Taman Vertikal. Agric Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Vol. 29, No. 1, Juli 2017: 11 – 2
Enjel, E., Launde, S., & Ramli, R. (2020). Pengaruh Bio Urin Sapi Terhadap Pertumbuhan Dan Hasil Tanaman Cabai (Capsicum annum L). Agrotek bis:
E-Jurnal …, 8(5), 1102–1109.
http://jurnal.faperta.untad.ac.id/index.php/agrotekbis/article/view/849%0A http://jurnal.faperta.untad.ac.id/index.php/agrotekbis/article/download/849/8 03
Farid, A., Romadi, U., Sawitri, B., dan Wandansari, N. R. 2016. Modul Evaluasi Penyuluhan Pertanian. STPP Malang
Ginting, E. 1991. Metode Kuliah Kerja Lapang. Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
Gusti, I. M., Gayatri, S., & Prasetyo, A. S. (2022). The Affecting of Farmer Ages, Level of Education and Farm Experience of the farming knowledge about Kartu Tani beneficial and method of use in Parakan Distric, Temanggung Regency. Jurnal Litbang Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 19(2), 209–221.
https://doi.org/10.36762/jurnaljateng.v19i2.926
Gustia, H., & Rosdiana, R. (2020). Kombinasi Media Tanam dan Penambahan Pupuk Organik Cair terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Produksi Tanaman Cabe.
Jurnal AGROSAINS Dan TEKNOLOGI, 4(2), 70.
https://doi.org/10.24853/jat.4.2.70-78
Harahap, A. H, 2018. Uji Efektivitas Pupuk Organik Cair (Poc) Dari Kulit Pisang Kepok Dan Urine Sapi Pada Bibit Kelapa Sawit (Elaeis guineensis Jacq) Di Pembibitan Utama. Skripsi. Fakultas Pertanian. Universitas Medan Area:
Medan
Hendrianto, A, Okalia, D, Mashadi. 2019. Uji Beberapa Sifat Fisika Tanah Bekas Tambang Emas Tanpa Izin (PETI) Di Tiga Kecamatan Di Daratan Sepanjang Sungai Kuantan. Juatika: Jurnal Agronomi Tanaman Tropika 1(1):19-31 (https://doi.org/10.36378/juatika.v1i1. 41)
Hendriyanto, F. (2019). Pengaruh Pemberian Poc Urine Sapi Terhadap. 2(2), 89–
97.
Huda, M. K. 2013. Pembuatan Pupuk organik Cair dari Urin Sapi dengan Aditif Tetes Tebu (Molasses) Metode Fermentasi. Skrip.si. Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang.
Idaryani, I., & Warda, W. (2018). Pemanfaatan Pupuk Organik Cair Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Tanaman Cabai. Biocelebes, 12.
https://bestjournal.untad.ac.id/index.php/Biocelebes/article/view/11570
Ignatus, H., Irianto dan A. Riduan. 2014. Respon Tanaman Terung (Solanum melongena L.) Terhadap Pemberian Pupuk Organik Cair Urine Sapi. Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Jambi. Seri Sains, 16 (1): 31-28.
Juliansyah, H., & Riyono, A. (2018). Pengaruh Produksi, Luas Lahan Dan Tingkat Pendidikan Terhadap Pendapatan Petani Karet Di Desa Bukit Hagu Kecamatan Lhoksukon Kabupaten Aceh Utara. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian Unimal, 1(2), 65–72.
Kusnadi, Dedy. 2011. Dasar-dasar Penyuluhan Pertanian. STPP Bogor Kusumastuti YI. 2009. Komunikasi Bisnis. Bogor (ID): Skripsi IPB.Press.
198 hal.
Kusmiati, S. R. T., Eddy, J., & Ria, I. (2007). Produksi Glukan dari dua Galur Agrobacterium sp. Pada Media Mengandung Kombinasi Molase dan Urasi.
Biodiversitas. Online.
Kusuma, A. P., Istirokhatun, T., & Purwono, P. (2017). Pengaruh Penambahan Urin Sapi dan Molase Terhadap Kandungan C Organik dan Nitrogen Total dalam Pengolahan Limbah Padat Isi Rumen Rph dengan Pengomposan Aerobik. Diponegoro University.
Kusumawati R. D., D. Hariyono , dan N. Aini. 2016. Pengaruh Komposisi Media Tanam dan Interval Pemberian Air Sampai dengan Kapasitas Lapang Terhadap Produksi Tanaman Cabai Rawit (Capsicum frutescens L.).
Journal of Agricultural Science. 1(2): 64- 71.
Mardikanto, Totok. 2009. Sistem Penyuluhan Pertanian. Diterbitkan Lembaga Pengembangan Pendidikan (LPP) UNS dan UPT Penerbitan dan Pencetakan UNS (UNS Press). Surakarta
Meriatna, Suryati, Fahri, A. 2018. Pengaruh Waktu Fermentasi dan Volume Bioaktivator EM4 (Effective Microorganisme) pada Pembuatan Pupuk Organik Cair (POC) dari Limbah Buah-Buahan. Jurnal Teknologi Kimia Unimal. Universitas Malikussaleh. Vol. 7 No.1.
Nawawi, A. H. S., Rahayub, A., & Mulyaningsih, Y. (2016). Pertumbuhan, produksi dan kualitas sawi manis (Brassica juncea L.) pada berbagai konsentrasi urin sapi dan dosis pupuk N, P dan K. Jurnal Agronida, 2(1), 10–19. https://unida.ac.id/ojs/index.php/JAG/article/viewFile/746/522
Nuke, Y., Ledheng, L., & Yustiningsing, M. (2021). Pengaruh Komposisi Media Tanam Organik Arang Sekam Dan Pupuk Kotoran Sapi Terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Kelangsungan Hidup Tanaman Cabai Merah (Capsicum annum L.) dan Cabai Rawit (Capsicum frutescens L.). Bioma : Berkala Ilmiah Biologi, 23(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.14710/bioma.23.2.125-132 Nuraedi, Ida. 2014. Media Penyuluhan Pertanian. Universitas Terbuka Jember.
Nur, T., Noor, A, R,. Elma, M. 2016. Pembuatan Pupuk Organik Cair Dari Sampah Organik Rumah Tangga Dengan Penambahan Bioaktivator EM4 (Effective Microorganisms). Teknik Kimia. Universitas Lambung Mangkurat,Vol.5 No.2.
Pangaribuan, D. H., Sarno, ., & Kurniawan, M. C. (2017). Pengaruh Pupuk Cair
111
Urine Sapi Terhadap Pertumbuhan Dan Produksi Tanaman Jagung Manis (Zea mays L.). Metamorfosa: Journal of Biological Sciences, 4(2), 202.
https://doi.org/10.24843/metamorfosa.2017.v04.i02.p11
Parihala, H. M. E., & Rehena, J. F. (2016). Pengaruh Volume Penyiraman Pupuk Cair Urine Sapi Terhadap Pertumbuhan Dan Produksi Tanaman Cabai Merah Besar (Capsicum annum L). Biopendix: Jurnal Biologi, Pendidikan Dan Terapan, 2(2), 119–126.
https://doi.org/10.30598/biopendixvol2issue2page119-126
Parwati, I. A. P., Sudaratmaja, I., Trisnawati, N. W., Suratmini, P., Suyasa, N., Sunanjaya, W., & Budiari, L. (2008). Pardi, 2008. Laporan Prima Tani LKDTIB Desa Belanga, Kintamani, Bangli, Bali.
Peraturan Menteri Pertanian Nomor : 49/Permentan/OT.140/10/2009. Jakarta:
Kementerian Pertanian.
Permentan. No. 52 Tahun 2009. Tentang Metode Penyuluhan Pertanian.
Peraturan Menteri Pertanian Nomor : 261/KPTS/SR.310//M/4/2019. Tentang Persyaratan Teknis Minimal Pupuk Organik, Pupuk Hayati, Dan Pembenah Tanah.
Pramana, K. S., Setiyo, Y., & Aviantara, I. G. N. A. (2019). Optimalisasi Proses Fermentasi Urin Sapi. Jurnal BETA (Biosistem Dan Teknik Pertanian), 7(1), 153–158.
Priangga, R,. Suwarno,. Hidayat, N. 2013. Pengaruh level pupuk organik cair terhadap produksi bahan kering dan imbangan daun-batang rumput gajah defoliasi keempat. Jurnal Ilmiah Peternakan. Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto. 1(1):365-373.
Putra, G. J. K., Setiyo, Y., & Sucipta, I. N. (2021). Pengaruh Penambahan Bakteri Nitrifikasi pada Fermentasi Urin Sapi Terhadap Kualitas Pupuk Organik Cair. Jurnal BETA (Biosistem Dan Teknik Pertanian), 10(1), 11.
https://doi.org/10.24843/jbeta.2022.v10.i01.p02
Putri, A, H. 2017. Pengaruh Berbagai Konsentrasi Pupuk Organik Cair (POC) Urin Sapi Terhadap Pertumbuhan Tanaman Bayam Hijau (Amaranthus Tricolor L.) skripsi. Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta.
Rahmadini Syafri, Chairil, D. S. (2017). Analisa Unsur Hara Makro Pupuk Organik Cair (POC) Dari Limbah Industri Keripik Nenas Dan Nangka Desa Kualu Nenas Dengan. Jurnal Photon, 8(1), 4–9.
Rahmawati, Mahludin, B., & Bahua, M. I., (2019). Peran Kinerja Penyuluh dan Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Penyuluhan pada Program Intensifikasi Jagung.
Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian 15(1), 56-70
Ramadhani, D., 2020. Pemberian Urine Sapi Terfermentasi Dengan Konsentrasi Yang Berbeda Terhadap Pertumbuhan Dan Hasil Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench). Skripsi. Fakultas Pertanian Dan Peternakan Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim, Riau Pekanbaru.
Rifaldi, M., Yatim, H., & ... (2021). Pengaruh Biourin Sapi Dan Pupuk Organik
Kotoran Sapi Terhadap Pertumbuhan Dan Hasil Tanaman Cabai Rawit (Capsicum frutescens L). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa …, 1, 111–118.
https://ojsuntikaluwuk.ac.id/index.php/jimfp/article/view/245%0A https://ojs-untikaluwuk.ac.id/index.php/jimfp/article/download/245/194 Rukmana, R. 2004. Usaha Tani Cabai Rawit. Kanisius. Jakarta. 90 hal
Santi Soraya Sintha. 2010. Kajian Pemanfaatan Limbah Nilam Untuk Pupuk Cair Organik dengan Proses Fermentasi. Jurnal Teknik Kimia. Vol 4. No 2. Hal 335-349.
Santoso, U., & Biyatmoko, D. (2022). Likasi Pupuk Organik Cair Fermentasi Urine Kelinci ( POCFERUCI ) Terhadap Pertumbuhan Dan Produksi Tanaman Cabai Di Wilayah Tungkaran Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Selatan Application of Liquid Organic Fertilizer Fermented Rabbit Urinee ( POCFERUCI ) on the Growth and Production of Chili Plants in the Tungkaran Area , Hulu Sungai Selatan Regency ( Santoso . U ., dan. 18(1), 202–209.
Saputri, R, D., Anantanyu, S., Wijianto, a., 2016. Peran Penyuluh Pertanian Lapangan Dengan Tingkat Perkembangan Kelompok Tani di Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Universitas Sebelas Maret. Agrista, Vol. 4 No. 3 : 341 – 352.
Septiani, N. Sufiani, H. Hazmi, H, Y. 2020. Pemanfaatan Produk Olahan Urine Sapi Menggunakan Sistem Aerasi Sebagai Pupuk Organik Cair (POC) di Desa Sepakek, Kecamatan Pringgarata, Kabupaten Lombok Tengah.
Universitas Mataram. Jurnal Warta Desa, Vol. 2 No. 1 : 89-94.
Septiani, D. 2012. Pengaruh Pemberian Arang Sekam Padi terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Hasil Tanaman Cabai Rawit (Capsicum Frutescens L).
Politeknik Negeri Lampung. Lampung.
Siboro, S. E., E. Surya, dan N. Herlina. 2013. Pembuatan Pupuk Cair dan Biogas dari Campuran Limbah Sayuran. Jurnal Teknik Kimia USU, 2 (3): 40-43.
Sofiarani, F. N., & Ambarwati, E. (2020). Pertumbuhan dan Hasil Cabai Rawit (Capsicum frutescens L.) pada Berbagai Komposisi Media Tanam dalam Skala Pot. Vegetalika, 9(1), 292. https://doi.org/10.22146/veg.44996
Sudarso Widya Prakoso Joyo Widakdo, D., Holik, A., & Nur Iska, L. (2021). Efek Usia dan Tingkat Pendidikan terhadap Kinerja Tenaga Bantu Penyuluh
Pertanian. Jurnal Penyuluhan, 17(1), 52–59.
https://doi.org/10.25015/17202131614
Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung:
Alfabeta.
Suhardana, E., 2020. Pengaruh Komposisi Media Tanam Arang Sekam Dan Pemberian Pupuk KCL Terhadap Pertumbuhan Dan Hasil Tanaman Bawang Dayak (Eleutherine americana Merr.). skripsi. Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
Sutiyoso, Y. (2009). Hidroponik. Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta.
113
Syafri., Chairil., D. Simamora. 2017. Analisa Unsur Hara Makro Pupuk Organik Cair (POC) dari Limbah Industri Keripik Nenas dan Nangka Desa Kualu Nenas dengan Penambahan Urin Sapi dan EM4. Jurnal Photon, 8 (1): 99-104.
Tjandra, E., 2011. Panen Cabai Rawit Di Polybag. Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Yogyakarta
Vebriansyah, R. 2018. Tingkatkan Produktivitas Cabai. Penebar Swadaya.
Jakarta.
Widiyanto, J., Wardani, F. A., Studi, P., Biologi, P., Pmipa, F., & Pgri, I. (2013).
Pengaruh Pemberian Pupuk Organik Cair Urin Sapi Dan Media Tanam Terhadap Struktur Anatomi Akar Dan Batang Tanaman Cabai (Capsicum frutescens L .) Sebagai Petunjuk Praktikum Mata Kuliah Anatomi Tumbuhan. Jurnal Akademika Biologi, 01(2), 159–166.
Wiryanta, W. T. Bernardinus. 2005. Bertanam Cabai Pada Musim Hujan.
Agromedia Pustaka. Jakarta. 79 hal.
Wiyono, S. M, Syukur. Dkk. 2012. Cabai Prospek Bisnis dan Teknologi Mancanegara. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
Yunandar D T, Hariadi S S, dan Raya A B. 2019. Strategi Penyuluhan Pembangunan Teori dan Praktik untuk Pengembangan Minat Pemuda Milenial Dalam Wirausaha Pertanian. Yogyakarta: Pintal.
Yuli A. Hidayati. dkk., 2011. Kualitas Pupuk Cair Hasil Pengolahan Feses Sapi Potong Menggunakan Saccharomyces Cereviceae. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak. Vol 11. No 2.
Zakaria, 2006. Modul Dasar-Dasar Penyuluhan Pertanian. Pusat Manajemen Pelatihan Sumberdaya Manusia Pertanian, Ciawi. Bogor
LAMPIRAN
114
Lampiran 1. Hasil Uji Lab Pupuk Organik Cair
116
Lampiran 2. Tabel ANOVA dan Duncan Tinggi Tanaman TINGGI TANAMAN MINGGU 1
NORMALITAS
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Standardized Residual for
TINGGI_TANAMAN_1
.056 36 .200* .986 36 .928
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction HOMOGENITAS
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa,b Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
TINGGI_TANAMA N_1
Based on Mean 1.776 11 24 .116
Based on Median .400 11 24 .942
Based on Median and with adjusted df
.400 11 8.679 .922 Based on trimmed
mean
1.627 11 24 .154
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Dependent variable: TINGGI_TANAMAN_1 b. Design: Intercept + P + M + P * M
ANOVA
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: TINGGI_TANAMAN_1
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 18.021a 11 1.638 14.875 .000
Intercept 2602.700 1 2602.700 23631.074 .000
P 11.861 3 3.954 35.897 .000
M 1.576 2 .788 7.154 .004
P * M 4.585 6 .764 6.938 .000
Error 2.643 24 .110
Total 2623.365 36
Corrected Total 20.665 35 a. R Squared = .872 (Adjusted R Squared = .813) DUNCAN
TINGGI_TANAMAN_1 Duncana,b
PM N
Subset
1 2 3
P0M1 3 7.4667
P0M2 3 7.5333
P0M3 3 7.6000
P1M3 3 8.3500
P3M3 3 8.4833
P2M1 3 8.5000
P1M1 3 8.6167
P3M2 3 8.7333
P2M2 3 8.7833
P2M3 3 8.8500
P3M1 3 8.9833
P1M2 3 10.1333
Sig. .648 .053 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .110.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
b. Alpha = .05.
TINGGI TANAMAN MINGGU 2 NORMALITAS
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Standardized Residual for
TINGGI_TANAMAN_2
.106 36 .200* .975 36 .591
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction HOMOGENITAS
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa,b Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
TINGGI_TANAMA N_2
Based on Mean 1.616 11 24 .157
Based on Median .580 11 24 .826
Based on Median and with adjusted df
.580 11 12.919 .814 Based on trimmed
mean
1.525 11 24 .187
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Dependent variable: TINGGI_TANAMAN_2 b. Design: Intercept + P + M + P * M
ANOVA
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: TINGGI_TANAMAN_2
Source
Type III Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 27.732a 11 2.521 14.734 .000
Intercept 5820.418 1 5820.418 34015.432 .000
P 17.797 3 5.932 34.670 .000
M 5.149 2 2.574 15.045 .000
P * M 4.786 6 .798 4.662 .003
Error 4.107 24 .171
Total 5852.258 36
118
Corrected Total 31.839 35
a. R Squared = .871 (Adjusted R Squared = .812) DUNCAN
TINGGI_TANAMAN_2 Duncana,b
PM N
Subset
1 2 3 4 5
P0M3 3 11.1833
P0M2 3 11.6500 11.6500 P0M1 3 11.6667 11.6667
P1M3 3 12.3333 12.3333
P3M3 3 12.3667 12.3667
P2M1 3 12.8500 12.8500
P2M3 3 12.8667 12.8667
P3M2 3 12.8833 12.8833
P1M1 3 13.1667
P2M2 3 13.6167 13.6167
P3M1 3 13.9333
P1M2 3 14.0667
Sig. .188 .062 .157 .051 .220
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .171.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
b. Alpha = .05.
TINGGI TANAMAN MINGGU 3 NORMALITAS
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Standardized Residual for
TINGGI_TANAMAN_3
.122 36 .196 .976 36 .599
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction HOMOGENITAS
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa,b Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
TINGGI_TANAMA N_3
Based on Mean 1.316 11 24 .275
Based on Median .382 11 24 .951
Based on Median and with adjusted df
.382 11 15.661 .944 Based on trimmed
mean
1.222 11 24 .325
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Dependent variable: TINGGI_TANAMAN_3 b. Design: Intercept + P + M + P * M
ANOVA
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: TINGGI_TANAMAN_3
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 92.782a 11 8.435 25.415 .000
Intercept 10128.745 1 10128.745 30519.759 .000
P 70.114 3 23.371 70.422 .000
M 5.721 2 2.860 8.619 .002
P * M 16.948 6 2.825 8.511 .000
Error 7.965 24 .332
Total 10229.493 36
Corrected Total 100.747 35 a. R Squared = .921 (Adjusted R Squared = .885) DUNCAN
TINGGI_TANAMAN_3 Duncana,b
PM N
Subset
1 2 3 4 5
P0M3 3 14.0833
P0M2 3 14.4167
P0M1 3 14.6333
P1M3 3 16.4167
P2M1 3 16.7833 16.7833
P3M3 3 17.0167 17.0167
P3M2 3 17.2167 17.2167
P1M1 3 17.3833 17.3833 17.3833
P2M3 3 17.5667 17.5667
P2M2 3 17.6167 17.6167
P3M1 3 18.4167
P1M2 3 19.7333
Sig. .281 .076 .130 .054 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .332.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
b. Alpha = .05.
TINGGI TANAMAN MINGGU 4 NORMALITAS
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Standardized Residual for
TINGGI_TANAMAN_4
.080 36 .200* .978 36 .690
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction HOMOGENITAS
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa,b Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
TINGGI_TANAMA N_4
Based on Mean 1.282 11 24 .293
Based on Median .311 11 24 .976
Based on Median and with adjusted df
.311 11 14.827 .971 Based on trimmed
mean
1.177 11 24 .352
120
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Dependent variable: TINGGI_TANAMAN_4 b. Design: Intercept + P + M + P * M
ANOVA
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: TINGGI_TANAMAN_4
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 230.542a 11 20.958 39.472 .000
Intercept 17344.890 1 17344.890 32666.285 .000
P 188.167 3 62.722 118.127 .000
M 8.182 2 4.091 7.704 .003
P * M 34.193 6 5.699 10.733 .000
Error 12.743 24 .531
Total 17588.175 36
Corrected Total 243.285 35 a. R Squared = .948 (Adjusted R Squared = .924) DUNCAN
TINGGI_TANAMAN_4 Duncana,b
PM N
Subset
1 2 3 4
P0M1 3 17.9500
P0M3 3 18.1667
P0M2 3 18.3000
P2M1 3 21.1333
P2M2 3 22.3667
P1M3 3 22.6500
P3M3 3 22.7000
P3M2 3 22.9500
P1M1 3 23.0500
P3M1 3 23.6667
P2M3 3 23.7167
P1M2 3 26.7500
Sig. .585 1.000 .057 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .531.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
b. Alpha = 0.05.
TINGGI TANAMAN MINGGU 5 NORMALITAS
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Standardized Residual for
TINGGI_TANAMAN_5
.110 36 .200* .978 36 .670
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
HOMOGENITAS
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa,b Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
TINGGI_TANAMA N_5
Based on Mean 2.248 11 24 .047
Based on Median .608 11 24 .804
Based on Median and with adjusted df
.608 11 11.527 .790 Based on trimmed
mean
2.082 11 24 .065
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Dependent variable: TINGGI_TANAMAN_5 b. Design: Intercept + P + M + P * M
ANOVA
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: TINGGI_TANAMAN_5
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 320.125a 11 29.102 48.280 .000
Intercept 27249.756 1 27249.756 45206.968 .000
P 227.476 3 75.825 125.793 .000
M 19.405 2 9.703 16.097 .000
P * M 73.243 6 12.207 20.252 .000
Error 14.467 24 .603
Total 27584.348 36
Corrected Total 334.592 35 a. R Squared = .957 (Adjusted R Squared = .937) DUNCAN
TINGGI_TANAMAN_5 Duncana,b
PM N
Subset
1 2 3 4 5
P0M1 3 22.9000
P0M2 3 23.4833
P0M3 3 23.8833
P2M1 3 26.6333
P1M3 3 27.0333
P2M2 3 27.5500 27.5500
P3M3 3 28.0167 28.0167 28.0167
P2M3 3 28.9000 28.9000
P3M2 3 29.0000
P1M1 3 29.1833
P3M1 3 29.4000
P1M2 3 34.1667
Sig. .155 .055 .054 .060 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .603.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
b. Alpha = .05.
122
TINGGI TANAMAN MINGGU 6 NORMALITAS
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Standardized Residual for
TINGGI_TANAMAN_6
.086 36 .200* .987 36 .943
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction HOMOGENITAS
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa,b Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
TINGGI_TANAMA N_6
Based on Mean 1.460 11 24 .211
Based on Median .325 11 24 .972
Based on Median and with adjusted df
.325 11 15.521 .967 Based on trimmed
mean
1.331 11 24 .267
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Dependent variable: TINGGI_TANAMAN_6 b. Design: Intercept + P + M + P * M
ANOVA
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: TINGGI_TANAMAN_6
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 195.421a 11 17.766 27.285 .000
Intercept 40277.145 1 40277.145 61859.097 .000
P 125.973 3 41.991 64.491 .000
M 10.011 2 5.005 7.688 .003
P * M 59.437 6 9.906 15.214 .000
Error 15.627 24 .651
Total 40488.193 36
Corrected Total 211.047 35 a. R Squared = .926 (Adjusted R Squared = .892) DUNCAN
TINGGI_TANAMAN_6 Duncana,b
PM N
Subset
1 2 3 4 5
P0M1 3 29.8333
P0M3 3 30.1833
P0M2 3 31.0833
P3M2 3 32.6167
P2M1 3 33.0667 33.0667
P1M3 3 33.2667 33.2667
P3M3 3 33.6833 33.6833
P2M3 3 34.0667 34.0667
P2M2 3 34.3167
P1M1 3 34.5500
P3M1 3 36.3667
P1M2 3 38.3500
Sig. .084 .058 .056 1.000 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .651.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
b. Alpha = .05.
JUMLAH DAUN 1 NORMALITAS
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Standardized Residual for JUMLAH_DAUN_1
.174 36 .008 .948 36 .093
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction HOMOGENITAS
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa,b Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
JUMLAH_DAUN _1
Based on Mean 2.000 11 24 .075
Based on Median .318 11 24 .974
Based on Median and with adjusted df
.318 11 20.000 .973 Based on trimmed
mean
1.763 11 24 .119
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Dependent variable: JUMLAH_DAUN_1 b. Design: Intercept + P + M + P * M ANOVA
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: JUMLAH_DAUN_1
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 7.972a 11 .725 8.697 .000
Intercept 2584.028 1 2584.028 31008.333 .000
P 2.806 3 .935 11.222 .000
M 2.056 2 1.028 12.333 .000
P * M 3.111 6 .519 6.222 .000
Error 2.000 24 .083
Total 2594.000 36
Corrected Total 9.972 35 a. R Squared = .799 (Adjusted R Squared = .708) DUNCAN
JUMLAH_DAUN_1 Duncana,b
PM N
Subset
1 2 3 4 5 6
P0M1 3 7.6667
P0M3 3 8.0000 8.0000
P1M3 3 8.1667 8.1667 8.1667 P3M3 3 8.1667 8.1667 8.1667
P0M2 3 8.3333 8.3333
124
P2M3 3 8.3333 8.3333
P3M2 3 8.3333 8.3333
P2M1 3 8.5000 8.5000 8.5000
P1M1 3 8.6667 8.6667 8.6667
P2M2 3 9.0000 9.0000 9.0000
P3M1 3 9.1667 9.1667
P1M2 3 9.3333
Sig. .062 .075 .075 .055 .055 .194
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .083.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
b. Alpha = .05.
JUMLAH DAUN 2 NORMALITAS
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Standardized Residual for JUMLAH_DAUN_2
.161 36 .019 .957 36 .174
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction HOMOGENITAS
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa,b Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
JUMLAH_DAUN _2
Based on Mean 1.758 11 24 .120
Based on Median .455 11 24 .913
Based on Median and with adjusted df
.455 11 15.059 .904 Based on trimmed
mean
1.620 11 24 .156
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Dependent variable: JUMLAH_DAUN_2 b. Design: Intercept + P + M + P * M ANOVA
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: JUMLAH_DAUN_2
Source
Type III Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 15.743a 11 1.431 8.587 .000
Intercept 3432.007 1 3432.007 20592.042 .000
P 6.743 3 2.248 13.486 .000
M 2.431 2 1.215 7.292 .003
P * M 6.569 6 1.095 6.569 .000
Error 4.000 24 .167
Total 3451.750 36
Corrected Total 19.743 35
a. R Squared = .797 (Adjusted R Squared = .705) DUNCAN
JUMLAH_DAUN_2 Duncana,b
PM N
Subset
1 2 3 4 5 6
P0M1 3 8.8333
P0M2 3 9.3333 9.3333
P0M3 3 9.3333 9.3333
P3M2 3 9.3333 9.3333
P3M3 3 9.3333 9.3333
P1M3 3 9.5000 9.5000 9.5000 P2M3 3 9.5000 9.5000 9.5000
P2M1 3 9.6667 9.6667 9.6667
P2M2 3 10.1667 10.1667 10.1667
P1M1 3 10.3333 10.3333
P3M1 3 10.5000
P1M2 3 11.3333
Sig. .092 .391 .078 .069 .355 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .167.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
b. Alpha = .05.
JUMLAH DAUN 3 NORMALITAS
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Standardized Residual for JUMLAH_DAUN_3
.111 36 .200* .976 36 .623
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction HOMOGENITAS
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa,b Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
JUMLAH_DAUN _3
Based on Mean 1.558 11 24 .175
Based on Median .210 11 24 .995
Based on Median and with adjusted df
.210 11 12.343 .993 Based on trimmed
mean
1.367 11 24 .250
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Dependent variable: JUMLAH_DAUN_3 b. Design: Intercept + P + M + P * M ANOVA
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: JUMLAH_DAUN_3
126
Source
Type III Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 32.243a 11 2.931 9.176 .000
Intercept 6227.840 1 6227.840 19495.848 .000
P 15.076 3 5.025 15.732 .000
M 7.056 2 3.528 11.043 .000
P * M 10.111 6 1.685 5.275 .001
Error 7.667 24 .319
Total 6267.750 36
Corrected Total 39.910 35 a. R Squared = .808 (Adjusted R Squared = .720) DUNCAN
JUMLAH_DAUN_3 Duncana,b
PM N
Subset
1 2 3 4 5
P0M1 3 12.0000
P0M3 3 12.3333 12.3333 P1M3 3 12.5000 12.5000 P3M3 3 12.5000 12.5000 P0M2 3 12.6667 12.6667 P2M1 3 12.6667 12.6667 P3M2 3 12.8333 12.8333
P2M3 3 13.1667 13.1667
P3M1 3 13.3333 13.3333
P2M2 3 14.0000 14.0000
P1M1 3 14.5000 14.5000
P1M2 3 15.3333
Sig. .127 .071 .099 .289 .084
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .319.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
b. Alpha = .05.
JUMLAH DAUN 4 NORMALITAS
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Standardized Residual for JUMLAH_DAUN_4
.167 36 .013 .963 36 .259
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction HOMOGENITAS
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa,b Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
JUMLAH_DAUN _4
Based on Mean 2.087 11 24 .064
Based on Median .682 11 24 .742
Based on Median and with adjusted df
.682 11 10.563 .732 Based on trimmed
mean
1.969 11 24 .080
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Dependent variable: JUMLAH_DAUN_4 b. Design: Intercept + P + M + P * M ANOVA
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: JUMLAH_DAUN_4
Source
Type III Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 170.354a 11 15.487 50.684 .000 Intercept 12600.062 1 12600.062 41236.568 .000
P 96.243 3 32.081 104.992 .000
M 18.500 2 9.250 30.273 .000
P * M 55.611 6 9.269 30.333 .000
Error 7.333 24 .306
Total 12777.750 36
Corrected Total 177.688 35 a. R Squared = .959 (Adjusted R Squared = .940) DUNCAN
JUMLAH_DAUN_4 Duncana,b
PM N
Subset
1 2 3 4 5 6
P0M1 3 15.6667
P0M2 3 16.1667
P0M3 3 16.1667
P2M1 3 17.5000
P1M3 3 18.0000 18.0000
P3M3 3 18.0000 18.0000
P3M2 3 18.3333 18.3333
P2M3 3 19.0000
P1M1 3 20.5000
P2M2 3 21.0000 21.0000
P3M1 3 21.5000
P1M2 3 22.6667
Sig. .306 .103 .052 .279 .279 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .306.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
b. Alpha = .05.
128
JUMLAH DAUN 5 NORMALITAS
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Standardized Residual for JUMLAH_DAUN_5
.122 36 .192 .972 36 .489
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction HOMOGENITAS
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa,b Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
JUMLAH_DAUN _5
Based on Mean 1.975 11 24 .079
Based on Median .300 11 24 .979
Based on Median and with adjusted df
.300 11 11.431 .972 Based on trimmed
mean
1.745 11 24 .123
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Dependent variable: JUMLAH_DAUN_5 b. Design: Intercept + P + M + P * M ANOVA
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: JUMLAH_DAUN_5
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 406.056a 11 36.914 33.858 .000 Intercept 30858.778 1 30858.778 28303.592 .000
P 267.944 3 89.315 81.919 .000
M 35.014 2 17.507 16.057 .000
P * M 103.097 6 17.183 15.760 .000
Error 26.167 24 1.090
Total 31291.000 36
Corrected Total 432.222 35 a. R Squared = .939 (Adjusted R Squared = .912) DUNCAN
JUMLAH_DAUN_5 Duncana,b
PM N
Subset
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
P0M1 3 24.8333 P0M3 3 24.8333 P0M2 3 25.0000
P2M1 3 27.1667
P3M3 3 27.8333 27.8333
P3M2 3 29.3333 29.3333
P1M3 3 29.6667 29.6667 29.6667
P2M3 3 30.8333 30.8333 30.8333
P1M1 3 31.3333 31.3333
P2M2 3 32.0000
P3M1 3 32.3333
P1M2 3 36.1667
Sig. .856 .442 .052 .108 .076 .119 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 1.090.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
b. Alpha = .05.
JUMLAH DAUN 6 NORMALITAS
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Standardized Residual for JUMLAH_DAUN_6
.083 36 .200* .988 36 .954
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction HOMOGENITAS
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa,b Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
JUMLAH_DAUN _6
Based on Mean 1.540 11 24 .181
Based on Median .297 11 24 .980
Based on Median and with adjusted df
.297 11 10.920 .972 Based on trimmed
mean
1.399 11 24 .236
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Dependent variable: JUMLAH_DAUN_6 b. Design: Intercept + P + M + P * M ANOVA
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: JUMLAH_DAUN_6
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 269.910a 11 24.537 19.099 .000 Intercept 46692.007 1 46692.007 36344.049 .000
P 192.965 3 64.322 50.067 .000
M 31.347 2 15.674 12.200 .000
P * M 45.597 6 7.600 5.915 .001
Error 30.833 24 1.285
Total 46992.750 36
Corrected Total 300.743 35
130
a. R Squared = .897 (Adjusted R Squared = .850) DUNCAN
JUMLAH_DAUN_6 Duncana,b
PM N
Subset
1 2 3 4 5 6
P0M1 3 31.3333
P0M3 3 32.5000 32.5000 P0M2 3 32.6667 32.6667
P2M1 3 34.3333 34.3333
P3M3 3 35.5000 35.5000
P1M3 3 36.5000 36.5000
P2M3 3 37.0000 37.0000
P1M1 3 37.1667 37.1667
P3M2 3 37.5000 37.5000
P2M2 3 38.0000
P3M1 3 38.5000
P1M2 3 41.1667
Sig. .186 .072 .220 .063 .067 1.000
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 1.285.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
b. Alpha = .05.
JUMLAH BUAH PANEN 1 NORMALITAS
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Standardized Residual for JUMLAH_BUAH_1
.108 36 .200* .965 36 .308
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction HOMOGENITAS
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa,b Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
JUMLAH_BUAH _1
Based on Mean 1.918 11 24 .088
Based on Median .396 11 24 .944
Based on Median and with adjusted df
.396 11 10.518 .929 Based on trimmed
mean
1.739 11 24 .124
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Dependent variable: JUMLAH_BUAH_1 b. Design: Intercept + P + M + P * M ANOVA
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: JUMLAH_BUAH_1
Source
Type III Sum
of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 171.139a 11 15.558 6.789 .000
Intercept 5017.361 1 5017.361 2189.394 .000
P 76.250 3 25.417 11.091 .000
M 34.847 2 17.424 7.603 .003
P * M 60.042 6 10.007 4.367 .004
Error 55.000 24 2.292
Total 5243.500 36
Corrected Total 226.139 35 a. R Squared = .757 (Adjusted R Squared = .645) DUNCAN
JUMLAH_BUAH_1 Duncana,b
PM N
Subset
1 2 3 4 5 6
P0M1 3 8.5000
P0M3 3 9.3333 9.3333
P0M2 3 10.1667 10.1667 10.1667 P1M3 3 10.1667 10.1667 10.1667 P2M1 3 10.3333 10.3333 10.3333
P3M3 3 11.3333 11.3333 11.3333 11.3333
P1M1 3 12.1667 12.1667 12.1667 12.1667
P2M3 3 12.6667 12.6667 12.6667
P3M2 3 12.6667 12.6667 12.6667
P2M2 3 13.5000 13.5000
P3M1 3 14.5000 14.5000
P1M2 3 16.3333
Sig. .052 .052 .089 .128 .102 .151
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 2.292.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3.000.
b. Alpha = .05.
JUMLAH BUAH PANEN 2 NORMALITAS
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Standardized Residual for JUMLAH_BUAH_2
.137 36 .087 .981 36 .785
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction HOMOGENITAS
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa,b Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
JUMLAH_BUAH _2
Based on Mean 1.628 11 24 .154
Based on Median .393 11 24 .945
Based on Median and with adjusted df
.393 11 14.443 .937 Based on trimmed
mean
1.490 11 24 .200
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Dependent variable: JUMLAH_BUAH_2 b. Design: Intercept + P + M + P * M