VI. SIMPULAN DAN SARAN
6.2 Saran
Penelitian mengenai dispersal dengan pendekatan genetika hendaknya didorong untuk mendapatkan data yang lebih akurat dan aliran gen dapat ditelusuri sehingga jalur dispersal yang digunakan dapat terpetakan dengan baik. Disarankan untuk studi selanjutnya hendaknya menguji pengaruh ukuran fragmen habitat, bentuk, derajat isolasi, kualitas habitat, heterogenitas, komposisi komunitas dan proses ekologi terhadap kemampuan dispersal amphibia.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Abdullah SA, Nakagoshi N. 2007. Forest fragmentation and its correlation to human land use change in The State of Selangor, Peninsular Malaysia.
Forest Ecology and Management 241: 39-48.
Alimi T. 2011. Trade and Environment Dimensions in the Food and Food Processing Industries in Asia and the Pacific: A Country Case Study of
Indonesia. Proceeding Workshop on Trade, Environment and Sustainable
Development for Policy. Acra, 24-26 January 2011.
Andrews KM. Gibbons JW, Jochimsen. 2008. Ecological Effects of Roads on
Amphibians and Reptiles: A Literature Review. Di dalam: Mtchell JC,
Brown RE, Bartholomew B. editor. Herpetological Conservation. The Society for The Study Amphibians and reptiles Urban Herpetology hlm 121-143.
Bascompte J, Sole RV. 1996. Habitat fragmentation and extinction threshold in spatially explicit model. Journal of Animal Ecology 65:465-473.
[Baristand Padang] Balai Riset dan Standardisasi Industri Padang. 2011. Hasil
Pengujian Air Sungai Kawasan PT. Kencana Sawit Indonesia. Balai Riset
dan Standardisasi Industri Padang. Padang.
Beier P, Noss RF. 1998. Do habitat corridor provide connectivity. Conservation
Biology 12(6):1241-1252.
Begon M, Townsend CR, Harper JL. Ecology Fram Individual to Ecosystems 4th
Edition. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Oxford. UK.
Bender DJ, Contretras TA, Fahrig L. 1998. Habitat loss and population decline: a meta-analysis of potongan size effect. Ecology 79:517:533.
Benedick S, Hill JK, Mustaffa N, Chey VK, Maryati M, Searle JB, Schilthuizen M, Hamer KC. 2006. Impacts of rain forest fragmentation on butterflies in northern borneo: species richness, turnover and the value of small fragments. J. Appl. Ecol. 43:967–977.
Bennett AF. 2003. Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and
Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and
Cambridge, UK.
Bickel TO, Bruhl CA, Gadau J, Holldobler B, Linsenmair KE. 2005. Influence of habitat fragmentation on the genetic variability in leaf litter ant populations
in tropical rainforests of Sabah, Borneo. Biodiversity and Conservation.
15(1): 157-175.
Bickford D, Tze HG, Lan Q, Kudavinage EP, Bradshaw CJA. 2010. Forest fragment and breeding habitat characteristics explain frog diversity and abundance in Singapore. Biotropica 42(1):119–125.
Blaustein AR, Kiesecker JM. 2002. Complexity in conservation: lessons from the global decline of amphibian populations. Ecology Letters 5:597-608.
Bruhl CA, Eltz T, Linsenmair KE. 2003. Size does matter: effects of tropical rainforest fragmentation on the leaf litter ant community in Sabah, Malaysia. Biodivers. Conserv. 12, 1371–1389.
Buden DW. 2000. the reptiles of Pohnpei, Federal States Of Micronesia.
Micronesica 32 (2): 155-180.
Burbrink FT, Phillips CA, Heske EJ. 1998. A riparian zone in southern illinois as a potential dispersal corridor for reptiles and amphibians. Biological
Conservation 86: 107-115.
Burel F, Baudry J. 2003. Landscape Ecology: Concept, Methods And
Applications. Science Publisher. Inc. Plymouth. United Kindom.
Carr LW, Fahrig L. 2001. effecy of road traffic on twom amphibian species of differing vagility. Conservation Biology. 15(4):1071-1078.
Colchester M, Anderson P, Jiwan N, Andiko, Toh MS. 2009. HCV and the RSPO. Report Of An Independent Investigation Into The Effectiveness Of
The Application Of High Conservation Value Zoning In Palm Oil Development In Indonesia. The Forest Peoples Programme. UK.
Collinge SK. 1996. Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: implication for landscape architecture and planning. Habitat. 36:59-77.
Craig RG, Beal KJ. 1992. The influence of habitat variables on marsh bird communities of the connecticut river estuary. Wilson Bull. 104(2):295-3
11.
Crosswhite DL, Fox SF, Thill RE. 1999. Comparison methods for reptiles and amphibians in uplands forests of the ouchita mountains. Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 79:45-50.
Cushman SA. 2006. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biological Conservation 128:231-240.
Doan TM. 2003. Which methods are most effective for surveying rain forest herpetofauna?. Journal of Herpetology 37:72–81.
Dixo M, Martins M. 2008. Are leaf-litter frogs and lizards affected by edge effects due to forest framentation in Brazilian Atlantic Forest? J. Trop. Ecol.
24(5):551-554.
Dodd CK Jr, Barichivich WJ, Smith LL. 2004. Effectiveness of a barrier wall and culverts in reducing wildlife mortality on a heavily traveled highway in Florida. Biological Conservation 118(5): 619–631.
Donald FP, Evans AD. 2006. Habitat connectivity restoration: the wider implication of agri-environment scheme. Journal of Applied Ecology
43:209–218.
Edwards DP, Hodgson JA, Hamer KC, Mitchell SL, Ahmad AH, Cornell SJ, Wilcove DS. 2010. Wildlife-friendly oil palm plantations fail to protect biodiversity effectively. Conservation Letters 3:236–242.
Eterovick PC. 2003. Distribution of anuran species among montane streams in South-Eastern Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology (2003) 19:219–228.
Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L, Burel FG, Crist TO, Fuller RJ, Sirami C, Siriwardena GM, Martin J. 2011. Functional landscape heterogenity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecology Letters 14: 101–
112.
Fahrig L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol.
Evol. Syst. 34:487–515.
Fahrig L. 1999. Forest loss and fragmentation: Which has the greater effect on
persistence of forest dwelling animal?.Di dalam. Rochelle J, Lehmann L,
Wisniewski J. (editor). Forest Fragmentation: Wildlife And Management Implications. Brill Publishing hlm 87-95.
Forman RTT. 2000. Estimate of the area that affected by the road system in The United State. Conservation Biology 4(1): 31-35.
Forman RTT, Godron M. 1986, Landscape Ecology. John Wiley & Sons. New
York.
Forman RTT, Godron M. 1981. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. BioScience, 31(10):733-740.
Funk CW, Greene AE, Corn PS, Allendorf FW. 2004. High dispersal in a frog species suggest thats it is vulnerable to habitat fragmentation. Biol. Lett.
Gouyon A. 2003. Eco-Certification as an Incentive to Conserve Biodiversity in
Rubber Smallholder Agroforestry Systems: A Preliminary Study. World
Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). Bogor.
Gillespie GR, AhmadE, Berjaya E, EvansA, AncrenazM, Benoit GoossensB, Scroggie MP. 2012. Conservation of amphibians in Borneo: relative value of secondary tropical forest and non-forest habitats. Biological Conservation,
in press
Gindo N. 2009. Harga Yang Mesti Dibayar Untuk Perkebunanan Kelapa Sawit Skala Besar. http://www.kpsmedan.org/index.php [12 Februari 2010]. Glastra R, Wakker E, Richer W. 2002. Oil palm Plantations and Deforestation in
Indonesia. What role do europe and Germany Play?. A Report by WWF
Germany in collaboration with WWF Indonesia and Swiss. World Wildlife Fund International.
Glista DJ, Devault TL, Dewoody JA. 2007. Vertebrate road mortality predominantly impacts amphibians. Herpetological Conservation and
Biology 3(1):77-87.
Geneletti D. 2002. Ecological Evaluation For Environmental Impact Assessment.
Netherlands Geographical Studies. Utrecht.
Harper KA, Macdonald E, Burton PJ, Chen J, Brosofske KD, Saunders SC, Euskirchen ES, Roberts D, Jaiteh MS, Essen P. 2005. Edge influence on
forest structure and composition in fragmented landscape. Conservation
Biology. 19(3):768-782.
Inger RF, Stuebing RB. 1997. A Field Guide To The Frogs Of Borneo.Sabah,
natural history Publication Sdn. Bhd.
Inger RF. 1969. Organization of communities of frogs along small rain forest streams in sarawak. Journal of Animal Ecology 38: 123–148.
Iskandar DT, Erdelen WR. 2006. Conservation of amphibians and reptiles in indonesia: issues and problems. Amphibian and Reptile Conservation.
4(1):60-87.
Iskandar D, Mumpuni. 2004a. Ingerophrynus biporcatus. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN
Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. [ 29 April 2012].
Iskandar D, Mumpuni. 2004b. Kalophrynus pleurostigma. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN
Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. [ 29 April 2012].
Iskandar D, Mumpuni. 2004c. Occidozyga sumatrana. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN
Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. [ 29 April 2012].
Jennings S, Nussbaum R, Judd N, Evans T. 2003. The High Conservation Value Forest Toolkit edition 1. Proforest, Oxford. UK.
Johnston B, Frid L. 2002. Clearcut logging restrict the movements of terrestrial pacific giant salamander (Dicamptodon tenebrosusgood). Canadian
Journal of Zoology. 80(12):2170-2177.
Kapos V, Wandelli E, Camargo JL, Ganade G. 1995. Edge-Related Changes in Environment and plant response due to forest fragmentation in central
amazonian. Di dalam: Laurance WF. Bierregard Jr RO, editor. Tropical
forest remnants. Ecology, Management and Conservation of fragmented
Communities.The University chicago press. Chicago.
Keller A, Rodel MO, Linsenmair KE, Grafe TU. 2009. The importance of environmental heterogeneity for species diversity and assemblage structure in bornean stream frogs. J. Anim. Ecol. 78:305-314.
Kurniati H. 2011. Final report Rapid Assessment On Amphibians And Reptiles
Diversity in PT. Kencana Sawit Indonesia. Bogor: Zoologican Society of
London (ZSL)-LIPI Project.
Kurniati H. 2009. Herpetofauna diversity in Kerinci Seblat National Park, Sumatra, Indonesia. Zoo Indonesia 18(2) : 45-68.
[KRHTI] Konsorsium Revisi HCV Toolkit Indonesia. 2008. Panduan identifikasi
Kawasan bernilai konservasi tinggi Di indonesia. Panduan Identifikasi
NKT Indonesia – version 2. Jakarta.
Koh LP. 2008a. Can oil palm plantations be made more hospitable for forest butterflies and birds? Journal of Applied Ecology,.45(4):1002-1009.
Koh LP. 2008b. Birds defend oil palms from herbivorous insects. Ecological
Applications, 18(4) :821- 825.
Koh LP, Wilcove. 2008. Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity?. Conservation Letters 1:60–64.
Kolozsvary MB, Swihart RK. 1999. Habitat fragmentation and the distribution of amphibians: patch and landscape correlates in farmland. Can. J. Zool. 77:
1288-1299.
Laurence WF. 2008. Theory meets reality: how habitat fragmentation research has transcended island biogeographic theory. Biological Conservation,
141(7):1731-1744.
Lehtinen RM, Ramanamanjato JB. 2006. Effects of rainforest fragmentation and correlates of local extinction in a herpetofauna from Madagascar. Applied
Herpetology 3: 95-110.
Lehtinen RM, Ramanamanjato J, Raveloarison JG. 2003. Edge effects and extinctions proneness in a herpetofauna from Madagascar. Biodiv.
Conserv. 12:1357-1370.
Loman J, Lardner B. 2009. Does landscape and habitat limit the frogs rana arvalis
and rana temporaria in agricultural landscapes? A field Experiment.
Applied Herpetology 6:227–236.
MacArthur RH. 1972. Geographical Ecology: Pattern In The Distributin of
Species. Princeton University Press. New Jersey.
Maddox T, Priatna D, Gernita E, Salampessy A. 2007. The Conservation of Tigers
and Other Wildlife in Oil Palm Plantations, Zoological Society of London.
Magurran AE. 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Publishing.UK.
Mann W, Dorn P, Brandl R. 1991.Local distribution of amphibians: the importance of habitat fragmentation. Global Ecology And Geography.
1:36-41.
Marsh DM, Pearman P, McGarigal G, Cushman SA, Velasco AM. 2007.
Ecological and genetic evidence that low order stream inhibit dispersal by red-backed salamander (Plethodon cinereus). Can. J. Zool. 85:319-327.
Marsh DM, Pearman PB. 1997. Effect of habitat fragmentation on the abundance of two species of leptodactylid frog of Andean Montane Forest.
Conservation Biology. 11(6): 1323-1328.
Matthew J, Struebig MJ, Kingston T, Zubaid A, Moh-Adnan A, Rossiter SJ. 2008. conservation value of forest fragments to palaeotropical bats. Biol.
Conserv. 141(8):2112-2126.
McEuen A. 1993. The wildlife corridor controversy: a review. Endangered Species. 10:1-6.
Menin M, Lima AP, Magnusson WE, Waldez F. 2007. Topographic and edaphic effects on the distribution of terrestrially reproducing anurans in central amazonia: mesoscale spatial patterns. J. Trop. Ecol. 17(2):86-91.
Mistar. 2008. Panduan Lapangan Amfibi & Reptil di Areal Mawas Propinsi
Kalimantan Tengah (Catatan di Hutan Lindung Beratus). Yayasan
Penyelamatan Orangutan Borneo The Borneo Orangutan Survival Foundation. Kalimaantan Tengah.
Mistar. 2003. Panduan LapanganAmfibi Kawasam Ekosistem Leuser. Gibbon
Foundation dan PILI NGO Movement. Jakarta.
Moody A, Woodcock CE. 1995. The influence of scale and the spatial characteristics of landscapes on land cover-mapping using remote sensing.
Landscape Ecology10:363-379.
Mulianty AS. 2010. Karakteristik mikrohabitat katak (Amphibia: Anura) di
perkebunan kelapa sawit, Kalimantan Timur [skripsi]. Bandung: Sekolah
Ilmu dan Teknologi Hayati, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Nuzzo VA, Mierzwa KS. 2000. The Effect of Forest Structure on Amphibian
Abundance and Diversity in the Chicago Region. Citizens for
Conservation. Illinois.
Olson DH, Anderson PD Frissell CA, Welsh Jr HH, Bradford DF. 2007. Biodiversity management approaches for stream–riparian areas: perspectives for Pacific Northwest Headwater Forests, microclimates, and amphibians. Forest Ecology and Management 246: 81–107.
Parris, KM, McCarthy, MA. 1999. What influences the structure of frog assemblages at forest streams?. Aust. J. Ecol. 24:495-502.
Persey S, Anhar S. Biodiversity Information for Oil Palm. Di dalam: Measurement and mitigation of environmental impact of palm oil production. Proceeding ICOPE 2010; Bali, 23-25 February 2010. Bali: International Conference on Oil Palm and Environment. 2,3:1-7.
[PT.KSI] PT. Kencana Sawit Indonesia. 2011. Pedoman Persyaratan ISCC.
PT.Kencana Sawit Indonesia. Sungai Kunyit. Sumbar.
Prugh, LR, Karen E. Hodges KE, Sinclair ARE, Justin S. Brasharesa JS. 2008. Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations.
PNAS. 105(52): 20770–20775.
Richter KO, Azous AL. 1997. Amphibian Distribution, Abundance And Habitat Use. Di dalam: Azous AL, Horner RR, editor. Wetlands And
Urbanization: Implications for the Future. Final Report of the Puget Sound Wetlands and Stormwater Management Research Program. Washington State Department of Ecology, King County Water and Land Resources Division dan the University of Washington, Chapter 5 hlm 95-109.
Ricketts TH. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. The American Naturalist. 158:87-99
Rizali A, Lohman DJ, Buchori D, Prasetyo LB, Triwidodo H, Bos MM, Yamane S, Schulze CH. 2010. Ant communities on small tropical islands: effects of island size and isolation are obscured by habitat disturbance and ‘tramp’ ant species. J. Biogeogr. 37: 229–236.
Robertson OJ, Radford JQ. 2009. Gap-crossing decisions of forest birds in a fragmented landscape. Austral Ecology 34:435–446.
Santos-Barrera G, Urbina-Cardona JN. 2011. The role of the matrix-edge dynamics of amphibian conservation in tropical montane fragmented landscapes. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 82: 679-687.
Silva M, Hartling LA, Field SA, Theater K. 2003. The effect of fragmentation habitat on amphibian species richness of prince edward island. Canadian
Journal of Zoology 81(4):563:573.
Schiesari L, Zuanon J, Azevedo-Ramos C, Garcia M, Gordo M, Messias M, Vieira EM. 2003. Macrophyte rafts as dispersal vectors for fishes and amphibians in the Lower Solimo˜es River, Central Amazon. Journal of
Tropical Ecology. 19:333–336.
Schiesari L, Gordo M, Hödl W. 2003. Treeholes as calling, breeding, and developmental sites for the amazonian canopy frog, Phrynohyas resinifictrix (Hylidae). Copeia. 2:263-272.
Schlaepfer MA, Gavin TA. 2001. Edge effect on lizzards and frog in tropical forest fragments. Conservation biology 15(4): 1079-1090.
Sheldon FH, Styring A, Hosner PA .2010. Bird species richness in a Bornean exotic tree plantation: A long-term perspective. Biological conservation 143: 399-407.
Shen G et al. 2009. Species–area relationships explained by the joint effects of dispersal limitation and habitat heterogeneity. Ecology 90(11): 3033–3041.
Simberloff DS. 1974. Equilibrium theory of island biogeography and ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5:161-182.
Smith MA, Green DM. 2005. Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations?. Ecography 28:110-128.
Tjorve E. 2003. Shapes and functions of species–area curves: a review of possible models. Journal of Biogeography 30:827–835.
Tischendorf L, Fahrig L. 2000. On The Usage And Measurment of Landcape Connectivity. Oikos. 90:7-19.
Tsuji-Nishikido BM, Menin M. 2011. Distribution of frogs in riparian areas of an urban forest fragment in Central Amazonia. Biota Neotrop. 11(2): 63-70. Toral CE, Feinsinger P, Crump ML. 2002. Frogs and a cloud-forest edge in
Ecuador. Cons. Biol. 16(3):735-744.
Turner EC, Snaddon JL, Ewer RM, Fayle TM, Foster WA. 2011. The Impact of Oil Palm Expansion on Environmental Change: Putting Conservation Research in Context. Di dalam: dos Santos Bernardes IMA, editor. Environmental Impact of Biofuels. InTech, Open Acces from:
http://www.intechopen.com/books/environmental impact of biofuels/the impact of oil palm expansion on nvironmental change putting conservation research in context. [24 April 2012].
Turner EC, Snaddon JL, Fayle TM, Foster WA. 2008. Oil palm research in context: identifying the need for biodiversity assessment. Plos One 3(2).
Turner EC, Foster WA. 2009. The impact of forest conversion to oil palm on arthropod abundance and biomass in Sabah, Malaysia. Journal of Tropical
Ecology 25:23–30.
Turner GM, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV. 2001. Landscape Ecology In Theory And
Practice, Pattern and Process. Springer-Verlag New York. Inc. New
York.
[RSPO] Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. 2004. Factsheet: Roundtable on
Sustainable Palm Oil . Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia.
Trevor JC, Richard B. Griffiths A. 2005. The amphibian decline crisis: a watershed for conservation biology?. Biological Conservation 125: 271–
285.
Van der Wal S. 2008. Sustainability Issues in the Tea Sector A Comparative
Analysis of Six Leading Producing Countries. Centre for Research on
Multinational Corporations. Amsterdam.
Van Sluys M. Vrcibradic D, Aalves MAS, Bergallo HG, Rocha, CFD. 2007. Ecological paramethers of the leaf-litter frog community of atlantic rainforest area at Ilha Grande, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Austral. Ecol.
32(3):254-260.
Wakker E. 2006. The Kalimantan Border Oil Palm Mega Project. A report for
Milieudefensie-Friends of the Earth Netherlands and Swedish Society for Nature Conservation (SSNC), Amsterdam.
Watling JI, Donnelly MA. 2008. Species richness and composition of amphibians
and reptiles in a fragmented forest landscape in Northeastern Bolivia.
Basic and Applied Ecology 9(5):523-532.
Wang J, Whitlock MC. 2003. Estimating effective population size and migration rates from genetic samples over space and time. Genetics 163: 429–446
Wanger TC, Saro A, Iskandar DT, Barry W, Brook BW, Sodhi NS, Clough Y, Tscharntke T. 2009. conservation value of cacao agroforestry for amphibians and reptiles in South-East Asia: combining correlative models with follow-up field experiments. Journal of Applied Ecology. 46:823–
832.
Wind E. 1999. Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Amphibians: What Do We
Know and Where Do We Go From Here?. Di dalam: L. M. Darling, editor.
2000. Proceedings of a Conference on the Biology and Management of Species and Habitats at Risk, Kamloops, B.C., 15 - 19 Feb 1999. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks and University College of the Cariboo hal 520-524.
Weyrauch SL, Grubb TC. 2004. patch and landscape characteristics associated with the distribution of woodland amphibians in an agricultural fragmented landscape: an information-theoretic approach. Biological
Conservation 115:443–450.
Yaap B, Struebig MJ, Paoli G, Koh LP. 2010. Review Mitigating The Biodiversity
Impacts Of Oil Palm Development. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in
Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 2010, No. 019 1-12.
Yanuareva MF. 2010. Pengaruh Daerah Peralihan Terhadap Distribusi Herpetofauna Di Kawasan Tambling Wildlife Nature Conservation,
Taman Nasional Bukit Barisan Selatan, Provinsi Lampung [skripsi].
Bogor: Departemen Konservasi Sumberdaya Hutan Dan Ekowisata, Fakultas Kehutanan, Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Zanini F. 2006. Amphibian Conservation In Human Shaped Environments: Landscape Dynamics, Habitat Modeling and Metapopulation Analyses
Lampiran 1. Karakter lingkungan
Data lingkungan
Lokasi Tanggal Cuaca Jumlah Orang Lokasi Tanggal Cuaca Jumlah orang
BTPU 13/7 Cerah 3 MBTP-S 06/7 Berawan 2
19/9 Berawan 10/7 Gerimis
BTPB 26/4 Cerah 3 MBST 14/6 Mendung 2
16/6 Cerah 16/6 Mendung
BTPT 22/4 Berawan 3 MBSB 23/5 Mendung 3
10/6 Berawan 01/6 Mendung
BTPS 05/7 Mendung 2 SJHU0 10/8 Cerah 2
09/7 Cerah 18/8 Cerah
BTPSK 07/8 Cerah 2 SJHU5 09/8 Berawan 2
17/8 Cerah 19/8 Berawan
BS 15/9/ Cerah 2 SJHI0 13/8 Berawan 2
20/9 Cerah 13/9 Berawan
BSSS 14/6 Berawan 3 SJHI5 10/8 Cerah 2
28/6 Mendung 17/9 Berawan
ST 13/4 Berawan 3 SSHU0 15/4 Cerah 4
09/6 Berawan 21/7 Cerah
MBTPT 25/4 Berawan 3 SSHU5 19/4 Cerah 4
12/5 Mendung 20/7 Berawan
MBTPB 05/5 Berawan 3 SSHI0 22/7 Berawan 2
20/5/11 Berawan 27/7/11 Berawan
MBTPU 10/5/11 Berawan 3 SSHI5 18/7/11 Cerah 2
21/5/11 Gerimis 28/7/11 Cerah
Hasil pengujian kualitas air
No. Parameter Uji Satuan
Baku mutu PPRI no. 82 tahun 2001 kelas II Hasil Analisa A1 A2 A3 A4 1 pH - 6,0 - 9,0 7,18 7,17 7,18 7,18 2 BOD-5 Mg/l Maks 3 0,96 0,51 0,58 0,72 3 COD Mg/l Maks 25 6 5 5 6
4 Padatan tersuspensi Mg/l Maks 50 16 11 12 12
5 Minyak/Lemak Mg/l Maks 1 TTD TTD TTD TTD
6 Nitrogen Total Mg/l Maks- 0,425 0,692 0,651 0,545 Keterangan: TTD = Tidak Terdeteksi, A1= Air Sungai Suir, A2= Air Sungai Ternuk, A3= Air Sungai Jujuan, A4= Air Waduk.
Lanjutan lampiran 1. Data tutupan tajuk
Lokasi Sub-transek (%) Mean (%)
1 2 3 4 5 BTPU 30 60,25 49,5 38,75 39 43,5 BTPB 60,5 57,75 49,25 52 40 51,9 BTPT 47 62,75 48,5 30,5 27 43,15 BPTS 68,5 44,25 50,25 40 38 48,2 BPTSK 5 22,5 43 0 0 14,1 ST 17,5 8,75 44,75 46,5 47,75 33,05 BSSS 35,75 39,5 47,25 43,25 37,75 40,7 BS 46,75 63,75 19,5 41,75 30,5 40,45 MBTPT 2,75 10 21 13,25 6,5 10,7 MBTPB 13 9,25 8 12,5 14,5 11,45 MBTPU 3,25 16 6,5 25 20,75 14,3 MBTP-S 5 10,25 18,25 16,5 9 11,8 MBSB 4 7 9,25 16,75 16,75 10,75 MBST 7,75 8,25 6,25 9,5 10 8,35 SJHU0 14,25 17 13,5 18,75 11 14,9 SJHU5 5 5,75 19,25 13,25 22,25 13,1 SJHI0 16 22,75 19,75 19,25 19,25 19,4 SJHI5 20,5 21,5 13 18 23,25 19,25 SSHU0 29,25 24,5 17 13,23 17,25 20,246 SSHU5 20 18 24 19,5 32,75 22,85 SSHI0 6 0 2,25 19,5 4 6,35 SSHI5 8,5 7,35 9,5 14,75 17 11,42
Lampiran 2. Ukuran SVL dan massa komunitas amphibia di KSI.
No. Spesies N SVL (cm) Massa (g)
Range Mean (st dev) Range Mean (st dev)
1 Bufo asper 73 1 – 10,600 6,087 (2,472) 1 - 157 40,941 (44,799) 2 Bufo biporcatus 1 2,344 2,344 (0) 2,5 2,5 (0) 3 Fejervarya cancrivora 10 2,988 – 4,261 3,924 (0,535) 2,5 – 9,5 7,5 (2,828) 4 Fejervarya limnocharis 12 2,889 – 5,077 4,051 (0,599) 2,5 – 14,0 7,444 (3,097) 5 Huia Sumatrana 10 2,776 – 3,037 2,885 (0,136) 2,0 – 5,2 3,4 (1,637) 6 Kalophrynus pleurostigma 5 3,421 – 6,014 4,231 (1,203) 4,0 – 6,0 5,3 (0,866) 7 Leptobrachium wayseputiense 5 3,142- 7,834 4,807 (1,956) 3,0 – 24,0 8,21 (8,381) 8 Limnonectes blythii 48 6,299 – 20,168 12,614 (5,316) 25,5 – 42,0 209,071 (180,701) 9 Limnonectes crybetus 61 1,200 – 9,333 4,464 (1,962) 0,5 – 66,0 14,76 (15,985) 10 Limnonectes kuhlii 47 2,639 – 5,285 3,874 (0,889) 3,0 – 35,0 11,125 (7,658) 11 Limnonectes microdiscus 12 2,127 – 6,103 4,179 (1,587) 1,0 – 6,5 3,25 (2,162) 12 Microhyla berdmorei 3 2,128 – 2,864 2,396 (0,407) 1,0 – 6,7 3,2 (3,043) 13 Microhyla Borneensis 3 1,997 – 4,310 2,706 (1,081) 1,5 – 3,0 2,0 (0,707) 14 Microhyla heymonsi 19 1,754 – 3,714 2,203 (0,439) 1,0 – 2,5 1,4 (0,416) 15 Microhyla sp 1 2,010 2,010 (0) 1 1 (0) 16 Occidozyga laevis 1 2,274 2,274 (0) 2,5 2,5 (0) 17 Occidozyga sumatrana 2 2,634 – 3,010 2,822 (0,226) 3,0 – 3,5 3,25 (0,354) 18 Polypdates cf macrotis 3 4,125 – 5,796 4,849 (0,630) 4,0 – 14,0 7,1 (4,03) 19 Polipedates leucomystax 22 2,791 – 6,620 4,686 (0,692) 1,5 – 16,5 6,0 (3,224) 20 Polypedates sp 6 3,638 – 6,457 4,641 (1,270) 2,5 – 11,0 4,7 (3,581) 21 Rana erythraea 32 3,501 – 7,247 5,670 (1,352) 3,0 – 32,5 19,0 (10,267) 22 Rana hosii 78 3,707 – 5,229 4,591 (0,387) 4,0 – 13,7 9,2 (2,801) 23 Rana nicobariensis 65 1,681 – 4,941 4,026 (0,673) 0,5 – 8,5 4,6 (1,862) 24 Rana parvaccola 63 1,342 – 4,562 3,453 (0,681) 0,5 – 6,0 2,90 (1,42) 25 Rana picturata 41 3,657 – 4,226 3,923 (0,226) 4,0 – 5,5 5,1 (0,585) 26 Rana raniceps 28 1,954 – 4,508 3,372 (0,887) 0,5 – 6,0 2,8 (1,752) 27 Rhachoporus cyanopunctatus 2 2,723 – 2,980 2,852 (0,182) 1,5 1,5 (0)
Lampiran 3 Jenis-jenis amphibia dan mikrohabitatnya pada elemen lanskap perkebunan.
No. Spesies Elemen Lanskap
Area inti Riparia Koridor
Genus Bufonidae
1. Bufo asper Bantaran sungai Bantaran sungai Tepi parit
2. Bufo biporcatus Daerah terbuka - -
Genus Ranidae
3. Fejervarya cancrivora - Bantaran sungai Piringan sawit
4. Fejervarya limnocaris - Tepian berpasir Piringan sawit
5. Rana erithraea - Bantaran sungai, vegetasi Parit
6. Rana hosii - Batu, vegetasi bantaran sungai Semak pakis-pakisan
7. Rana picturata Vegetasi tepi sungai Vegetasi bantaran sungai
8. Rana raniceps Vegetasi tepi sungai Vegetasi pada daerah air sungai yang
menggenang Semak pakis-pakisan
9. Rana parvaccola Vegetasi di tepi
sungai
Vegetasi di tepi sungai Semak pakis-pakisan
10. Rana nicobariensis - Ceruk berair pada batu Pelepah sawit kering, genangan di tepi
jalan
11. Huia sumatrana - Batu, vegetasi tepi sungai -
12. Limnonectes crybetus Bantaran sungai Bantaran sungai Tepi parit
13. Limnonectes kuhlii Tepian sungai
berpasir
Tepian sungai berpasir Tepi parit
Lanjut an Lam piran 1.
15. Limnonectes blythii Bantaran Sungai Bantaran Sungai Di sekitar parit, genangan di tepi jalan
16. Occydoziga laevis Kubangan di tepi
sungai
- -
17. Occydoziga sumatrana Kubangan di tepi
sungai - -
Genus Microhylidae
18. Kalophrynus pleurostigma Serasah - -
9. Microhyla berdmorei Serasah Tanah di bawah semak-semak Tanah sekitar semak-semak
20. Microhyla borneensis Serasah - -
21. Microhyla heymonsi Serasah Tanah bantaran sungai Di bawah pelepah kering, genangan tepi
jalan
22. Microhyla sp Akar banir - -
Genus Rhacophoridae
23. Polypedates leucomystax Vegetasi di tepi