• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Perlu dilakukan penstabilan bekatul dengan metode yang lain seperti penggunaan ekstruder ataupun metode untuk memodifikasi sifat fisik fungsional tepung bekatul agar dapat diaplikasikan pada produk minuman. Selain itu perlu dilakukan penelitian lebih lanjut dalam tahap formulasi untuk meminimalkan rasa pahit yang ditimbulkan tepung bekatul sehingga klaim manfaat kesehatan dari penambahan ini dapat diperoleh melalui penambahan tepung bekatul yang lebih banyak. Penentuan umur simpan produk berdasarkan parameter objektif juga perlu dilakukan seperti penurunan mutu protein, yang ditunjukkkan dengan penurunan kadar asam amino lisin tersedia yang diakibatkan oleh terjadinya reaksi Maillard.

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Anonim, 2007. Desain Expert 7. http : // www.statease.com. [20 Agustus 2007] Arpah, M. dan Syarief, R. 2000. Evaluasi Model-model Pendugaan Umur Simpan

Pangan dari Difusi Hukum Fick Unidireksional. Bul. Teknol. dan Industri Pangan. XI. 1-11.

Arpah, M. 2001. Buku dan Monograf Penentuan Kadaluarsa Produk Pangan. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

Asp, N.G., Johannson,C. G., Hallmer, H., dan Sijestrin, M. 1983. Rapid Assay of Insoluble and Soluble Dietary Fiber. J. Agr. Food Chem 31: 476-482. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). 1984. Official Methods of

Analysis. Association of Analytical Chemists Publishers, Washington D.C. . 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Analytical Chemists Publishers, Washington D.C. Badan Standarisasi Nasional. 1999. SNI Susu Bubuk (SNI 01-2970-1999). Badan

Standarisasi Nasional, Jakarta.

Barber, S., Benedito de Barber, C. 1980. Rice Bran : Chemistry and Technology. Di dalam : Luh, B.S. (Ed.). Rice : Production and Utilization. The AVI Publishing Company, Westport.

Belitz, H. D. dan Grosch, W. 1987. Food Chemistry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Bhattacharya, k. R. dan Sowbaghya, C. M. 2007. A Colorimetric Bran Pigment Method for Determining the Degree of Milling Rice. http : // www.interscience.wiley.com. [ 25 Agustus 2007].

Brennan, J.G., Butters, J. R., Cowell, N. D. dan Lilly, A. E. V. 1981. Food Engineering Operations, 2nd Edition. Applied Science Publishers Limited, London.

Buckle, K.A., Edwards, R.A., Fleet, G.H., dan Wootton, M.C. 1987. Ilmu Pangan. Penerjemah Purnomo, H. dan Adiono. UI Press, Jakarta.

Champagne, E.T., Hron, R.J., dan Abraham, G. 1992. Utilizing Ethanol to Produce Stabilized Brown Rice Products. JAOCS 69 (3) : 205-208.

Cheeke, P.R. dan Shull, L.R. 1985. Natural Toxicants in Feeds and Poisonous Plant. The AVI Publishing Company, Westport.

Cheng, H.H. 1993. Total Dietary Fiber Content of Polished, Brown, and Bran Types of Japonica and Indica Rice in Taiwan : Resulting Physiological Effects of Consumption. Nutrition Research 13 (1) : 93-101.

Chicester, D. F. dan Tanner Jr., F. W. 1978. Antimicrobial Food Additives. Di dalam: Furia, T. E (Ed.). Handbook of Food Additives vol. 1, 2nd edition. CRC Press Inc., Florida.

Cornell, J. A. 1990. Experiment With Mixtures, Design, Models, and The Analysis of Mixture Data. 2nd Edition. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.

Damardjati, D.S. 1983. Physical and Chemical Properties Characteristic of Some Indonesian Rice Varieties. Disertasi. Fakultas Pasca Sarjana IPB, Bogor. Damardjati, D.S. dan Luh, B.S. 1986. Physicochemical Properties of Milled Rice

Flour Fortified by Stabilized Bran and its Extruded Products. Di dalam : Post Doctoral Training Report. Departement of Food Science and Technology University of California.

Damardjati, D.S., Santosa, B.A., dan Widowati, S. 1987. Prospek Pengembangan Bekatul Awet untuk Nutrifikasi Makanan. Risalah Seminar Bahan Tambahan Makanan. PATPI-GAPMMI-PAU IPB, Bogor.

Damardjati, D.S. dan Oka, M. 1989. Evaluation of Rice Quality Characteristics Preferred by Indonesian Urbans Consumers. Prac. Of 22nd ASEAN Seminar on Grain Postharvest Research and Development Priorities for the Nineties. Surabaya, 29-31 Agustus 1989.

Damardjati, D.S., Santosa, B.A., dan Munarso, J. 1990. Studi Kelayakan dan Rekomendasi Teknologi Pabrik Pengolahan Bekatul. Laporan Akhir. Balai Penelitian Tanaman Pangan Sukamandi, Subang.

Damayanthi, E. 2002. Karakteristik Bekatul Padi (Oryza sativa) Awet serta Aktivitas Antioksidan dan Penghambatan Proliferasi Sel Kanker secara in vitro dari Minyak dan Fraksinya. Disertasi. Program Pascasarjana IPB, Bogor.

Damayanthi, E., Madanijah, S., dan Sofia, I.S. 2001. Sifat Fisikokimia dan Daya Terima Tepung Bekatul Padi Awet sebagai Sumber Serat Pangan. Di dalam : Nuraida, L. dan Dewanti, R.H. (Eds.). Pangan Tradisional Basis Bagi Industri Pangan Fungsional dan Suplemen. PAU Pangan dan Gizi IPB, Bogor.

Damayanthi, E., Tjing, L. T., dan Arbiyanto, L. 2006. Rice Bran. Penebar Swadaya, Depok.

deMan, J. M. 1997. Kimia Makanan. Penerjemah Kokasih Padmawinata. Penerbit ITB, Bandung.

Desrosier, N. W. 1988. The Technology of Food Preservation 3rd edition.The AVI Publishing Company Inc., Westport.

Depkes RI, 1989. Daftar Komposisi Bahan Makanan. Penerbit Bhratara, Jakarta. Eliason, A. C. L. 1981. Effect of Water Content on the Gelatinization of Wheat

Starch. Starke 32:270-272.

Ellis, M.J. 1994. Methodology of Shelf Life Determination. Di dalam : Man, C.M.D. dan Jones, A.A (Eds.). 1994. Shelf Life Evaluation of Foods. Blackie Academic and Professional, London.

Fardiaz, S. 1991. Penuntun Praktek Mikrobiologi Pangan. IPB Press, Bogor. Fennema, O. R. 1985. Food Chemistry. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.

Gomez, M. H. dan Aguilera, J. M. 1983. Changes in the Starch Fraction During Extrusion Cooking of Corn. J. Food Science 48(2): 378-381.

Goldberg, I. 1994. Functional Food. Chapman and Hill, New York.

Harbers, L. H., dan Nielsen, S. S., 2003. Ash Analysis. Di dalam : Nielsen, S. S. (Ed.). Food Analysis. 3 rd Edition. Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publisher, New York.

Hargrove, R.E. dan Alford, J.A. 1983. Composition of Milk Products. Di dalam : Webb, B.H., Johnson, A.H., dan Alford, J.A. (Eds.). Fundamental of Dairy Chemistry 2nd edition. The AVI Publishing Company Inc., Westport. Hariyadi, P. 2004. Pendugaan Waktu Kadaluarsa (Shelf Life) Bahan dan Produk

Pangan. Pusat Studi Pangan dan Gizi IPB, Bogor.

Hidayati, P. W. 2003. Mempelajari Pengaruh Penambahan Hidrogen Peroksida (H2O2) dan Kitosan Sebagai Bahan Penjernih pada Proses Pembuatan Tepung Karagenan dari Rumput Laut Jenis Eucheuma cottonii. Skripsi. Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian, IPB, Bogor.

Hilliam, M. 2000. Functional Food : How Big is the Market?. World of Food Ingredient 12 : 50-53.

Ho, C. T. 1991. Phenolic Compounds in Food. Di dalam : Ho, C. T., Lee, C.Y., dan Huang, M. T. (Eds.). Phenolic Compounds in Food and Their Effects on Health I. American Chemical Society, Washington.

Hoefler, A. C. 2004. Hydrocolloids: Practical Guides for the Food Industry. Eagan Press, St. Paul.

Hoseney, R. C. 1998. Principles of Cereal Science and Technology, 2nd edition. America Association of Cereal Chemists Inc., St. Paul.

Juliano, B.O. 1985. Rice Bran. Di dalam : Juliano, B.O. Rice : Chemistry and Technology. AACC, St Paul.

. 1993. Rice in Human Nutrition. Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations, Roma.

Kahlon, T.S., Chow, F.I., dan Sayre, R.N. 1994. Cholesterol-Lowering Properties of Rice Bran. J. Cereal Food World vol. 39 (2) : 99-102.

Kahlon, T.S. et al..1996. Cholesterol-Lowering by Rice Bran and Rice Bran Oil Unsaponifiable Matter in Hamsters. Cereal Chemistry 73 (1) : 69-74. Kao, C. Dan Luh, B.S. 1991. Rice Oil. Di dalam : Luh, B.S. (Ed.). Rice volume

2.Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

Khalil. 1999. Pengaruh Kandungan Air dan Ukuran Partikel Terhadap Perubahan Perilaku Fisik Bahan Pakan Lokal : Kerapatan Tumpukan, Kerapatan Pemadatan,dan Berat Jenis. J. Media Peternakan vol. 22 No. 1 :1-11. Kusnandar, F. dan Andarwulan, N. 2006. Modul Analisa Sifat Rheologi Pangan

Cair. Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian IPB, Bogor.

Labuza T. P. 1982. Shelf Life Dating of Foods. Food and Nutrition Press Inc., Westport.

Liana. 1987. Pembuatan Produk Pasta Berprotein Tinggi : Campuran Susu Skim, Yoghurt, dan Pasta Kacang Tanah. Skripsi. Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian,

IPB, Bogor.

Linder, M. C. 1992. Nutritional Biochemistry and Metabolism. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., New York.

Luh, S. 1991. Rice Production and Utilization. The AVI Publishing Company, Westport.

McCaskill, D.R. dan Zhang, F. 1999. Use of Rice Bran Oil in Foods. Food Technology : 53 (2) : 50-53.

Ma’arif, M. S., Machfud dan Sukron, M. 1989. Teknik Optimasi Rekayasa Proses Pangan. PAU Pangan dan Gizi, IPB, Bogor.

Meilgaard, M., Civille, G. V. dan Carr, B. T., 1999. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. 3rd Ed. CRC Press, New York.

Milner, A. 2000. Functional Foods : the US Perspective. Am J Clin nutr 7 Suppl : 1654S-1659S.

Muchtadi, D. 1989. Aspek Biokimia dan Keamanan Pangan. PAU Pangan dan Gizi IPB, Bogor.

Muchtadi, D., Puspitasari, N.L., dan Susana, L. 1995. Partial Substitution of Wheat Flour Rice Bran as Dietary Fiber and Niacin Sources in Sweet Bread and Cookies. 1st International Conference on East-West Perspectives on Functional Food. Singapura, 26-29 September.

Mukherjee, K.D. dan Hills. 1994. Lipases from Plants. Di dalam : Wooley, P. (Ed.). Lipases : Their Structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Nestel, P. J. 1990. Dietary Fiber. Medical J. Australia 15 (3) : 123-124.

Nurkhoeriyati, T. 2007. Perubahan Sifat Fisikokimia dan Pendugaan Umur Simpan Minuman Fungsional Susu Skim yang Disuplementasi Tepung Kedelai Kaya Isoflavon serta Difortifikasi Vitamin C dan E. Skripsi. Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian, IPB, Bogor.

Pontoh, J. 1986. Mempelajari Pembuatan dan Sifat Fisikokimia Makanan Ekstrusi Sorghum dan Kacang Hijau. Skripsi. Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian IPB, Bogor.

Randall, J.M. et al. 1985. Rice Bran Stabilization by Extrusion Cooking for Extraction of Edible Oil. J. Food Sci. 50 : 361-365.

Rimbawan, J. W. 1977. A Study of Some Physico-Chemical Properties of Nonfat Dry Milk as Affected by Process Temperature. Thesis. The Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Product Technology, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor.

Robinson, T. 1991. Kandungan Organik Tumbuhan Tingkat Tinggi. Penerjemah Padmawinata, K. Penerbit ITB, Bandung.

Saiz, A. I.,Manrique, G. D. dan Fritz, R. 2007. The Bleaching of Flour. http : // www.cat.inist.fr.com. [ 25 Agustus 2007].

Sathe, S. K. dan Salunkhe, D. K. 1981. Isolation : Partial Characterization and Modification of the Great Northern Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Starch J. Food Science : 46 (2):617-621.

Saunders, R.M. 1990. The Properties of Rice Bran as a Foodstuff. Cereal Foods World 35 (7) : 632-636.

Sayre, R.N., Saunders, R.M., Enochian, R.V. dan Schultz, W.G. 1982. Cereal Foods World 27 : 317.

Seetharamaiah, G. S. dan Chandrasekara, N. 1989. Studies on Hypocholesterolemic Activity of Rice Bran Oil. Atherosclerosis 78 (2-3) : 219-223.

Siwi, B.H. dan Kartowinoto, S. 1989. Plasma Nutfah Padi. Di dalam : Ismunadji, M., Partohadjono, S., Syam, M., dan Widjono, A. Padi (2) : 321-334. Soekarto, S. T. 1979. Pangan Semi Basah: Keamanan dan Potensinya dalam

Perbaikan Gizi Masyarakat. Seminar Teknologi Pangan IV, 15-17 Mei 1979.

Sulistijani, D. A. 1998. Sehat dengan Menu Berserat. Trubus Agriwidya, Jakarta. Syarief, R. Dan Halid, Y. 1993. Teknologi Penyimpanan Pangan. Penerbit Arcan,

Bandung.

Tangenjaya, B. 1991. Pemanfaatan Limbah Padi untuk Industri. Di dalam : Soenarjo, E., Damardjati, D.S., dan Syam, M. (Eds.). Padi buku 3. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Tanaman Pangan, Bogor.

Thomphson M. P., Tarassuk, N. P., Jenness, R., Lillevik, H. A., Ashworth, U. S., dan Rose, D. 1965. Nomenclature of the Proteins of Cow’s Milk-Second Revision. J. Dairy Sci 48 : 159.

Varnam, A. H. dan Sutherland, J. P. 1994. Milk and Milk Product Technology, Chemistry, and Microbiology. Chapman and Hall, London.

Warner, J.N. 1975. Principles of Dairy Processing. Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi.

Winarno, F. G. dan Jenie, B. S. L. 1974. Dasar Pengawetan, Sanitasi, dan Keracunan. PAU Pangan dan Gizi IPB, Bogor.

Winarno, F.G. 2002. Kimia Pangan dan Gizi. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta. Wong, M. L., Timms, R. E. dan Goh, E. M. 1988. Colorimetric Determination of

Total Tocopherols in Palm Oil, Olein, and Stearin. JAOCS 65(2): 258-261. Wood, J. H., Keenan, C. W. dan Bowmann, W. E. 1966. Fundamental of College

Chemistry. Harper and Row, New York.

Yawadio, R., Tanimori, S., dan Morita, N. 2006. Identification of Phenolic Compounds Isolated from Pigmented Rices and Their Aldose Reductase Inhibitory Activities. http : // www.sciencedirect.com. [ 25 Agustus 2007].

Yoanasari, Q. T. 2003. Pembuatan Bubur Bayi Instan dari Pati Garut. Skripsi. Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian, IPB, Bogor.

Young, K. W., Neumann, S. L., McGill, A. S., dan Hardy, L. R. 1980. The Use of Dilute Solution of H2O2 of White Flesh. Di dalam : Fish Science and Technology. Connell, J. J (Ed.). Advances Fishing New Books Ltd., Surrey.

Yuniarrahmani, C. 2001. Pengawetan Bekatul dengan Perlakuan Fisik: Pemanasan Menggunakan Drum Drier, Ekstruder, Penyangraian, Pengukusan, dan Autoclave. Skripsi. Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian IPB, Bogor.

Lampiran 1. Hasil uji Anova pengaruh konsentrasi NaHSO3 terhadap nilai L

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: nilai_L Source

Type III Sum

of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Corrected Model 1.750(a) 3 .583 7.814 .038 Intercept 21562.376 1 21562.376 288894.67 2 .000 konsentrasi 1.750 3 .583 7.814 .038 Error .299 4 .075 Total 21564.424 8 Corrected Total 2.048 7 a R Squared = .854 (Adjusted R Squared = .745)

Post Hoc Test

Konsentrasi

Homogeneous Subsets

nilai_L Duncan konsentrasi N Subset 1 2 .00 2 51.2150 300.00 2 51.8050 51.8050 400.00 2 52.1800 500.00 2 52.4650 Sig. .097 .077 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on Type III Sum of Squares

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .075. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2.000. b Alpha = .05.

Lampiran 2. Hasil uji Anova pengaruh konsentrasi NaHSO3 terhadap nilai a

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: Nilai_a Source

Type III Sum

of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Corrected Model .006(a) 3 .002 2.733 .178 Intercept 177.002 1 177.002 257457.61 8 .000 konsentrasi .006 3 .002 2.733 .178 Error .003 4 .001 Total 177.011 8 Corrected Total .008 7 a R Squared = .672 (Adjusted R Squared = .426)

Post Hoc Test

Konsentrasi

Homogeneous Subsets

Nilai_a Duncan konsentrasi N Subset 1 300.00 2 4.6650 500.00 2 4.6950 .00 2 4.7200 400.00 2 4.7350 Sig. .060

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. Based on Type III Sum of Squares

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .001. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2.000. b Alpha = .05.

Lampiran 3. Hasil uji Anova pengaruh konsentrasi NaHSO3 terhadap nilai b

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: nilai_b Source

Type III Sum

of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Corrected Model 1.431(a) 3 .477 63.817 .001 Intercept 484.850 1 484.850 64862.849 .000 konsentrasi 1.431 3 .477 63.817 .001 Error .030 4 .007 Total 486.311 8 Corrected Total 1.461 7 a R Squared = .980 (Adjusted R Squared = .964)

Post Hoc Test

Konsentrasi

Homogeneous Subsets

nilai_b Duncan konsentrasi N Subset 1 2 3 4 300.00 2 7.2550 500.00 2 7.5800 .00 2 7.9050 400.00 2 8.4000 Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

Based on Type III Sum of Squares

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .007. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2.000. b Alpha = .05.

Lampiran 4. Hasil uji Anova pengaruh konsentrasi NaHSO3 terhadap nilai ho

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: nilai_h Source

Type III Sum

of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Corrected Model 11.474(a) 3 3.825 30.294 .003 Intercept 27718.351 1 27718.351 219551.29 7 .000 konsentrasi 11.474 3 3.825 30.294 .003 Error .505 4 .126 Total 27730.330 8 Corrected Total 11.979 7 a R Squared = .958 (Adjusted R Squared = .926)

Post Hoc Test

Konsentrasi

Homogeneous Subsets

nilai_h Duncan konsentrasi N Subset 1 2 3 300.00 2 57.3500 500.00 2 58.3000 58.3000 .00 2 59.2000 400.00 2 60.6000 Sig. .056 .064 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

Based on Type III Sum of Squares

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .126. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2.000. b Alpha = .05.

Lampiran 5. Hasil uji Anova nilai L bekatul segar dan bekatul berbagai perlakuan stabilisasi

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: L Source

Type III Sum

of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Corrected Model 23.606(a) 3 7.869 533.023 .000 Intercept 23859.109 1 23859.109 1616197.0 54 .000 Bahan 23.606 3 7.869 533.023 .000 Error .059 4 .015 Total 23882.774 8 Corrected Total 23.665 7 a R Squared = .998 (Adjusted R Squared = .996)

Post Hoc Test

Bahan

Homogeneous Subsets

L Duncan Bahan N Subset 1 2 3 P2 2 52.3250 P1 2 53.5800 P3 2 56.2000 BS 2 56.3400 Sig. 1.000 1.000 .313 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

Based on Type III Sum of Squares

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .015. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2.000. b Alpha = .05.

Lampiran 6. Hasil uji Anova densitas kamba berbagai perlakuan stabilisasi

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: D_Kamba Source

Type III Sum

of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Corrected Model .026(a) 2 .013 37.762 .007 Intercept .968 1 .968 2765.762 .000 Perlakuan .026 2 .013 37.762 .007 Error .001 3 .000

Total .996 6

Corrected Total .027 5 a R Squared = .962 (Adjusted R Squared = .936)

Post Hoc Test

Perlakuan

Homogeneous Subsets

D_Kamba Duncan Perlakuan N Subset 1 2 P3 2 .3100 P2 2 .4300 P1 2 .4650 Sig. 1.000 .158 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

Based on Type III Sum of Squares

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .000. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2.000. b Alpha = .05.

Lampiran 7. Hasil uji Anova densitas padat berbagai perlakuan stabilisasi

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: D_Padat Source

Type III Sum

of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Corrected Model .024(a) 2 .012 17.167 .023 Intercept 2.184 1 2.184 3120.095 .000 Perlakuan .024 2 .012 17.167 .023 Error .002 3 .001

Total 2.210 6

Corrected Total .026 5 a R Squared = .920 (Adjusted R Squared = .866)

Post Hoc Test

Perlakuan

Homogeneous Subsets

D_Padat Duncan Perlakuan N Subset 1 2 P3 2 .5150 P2 2 .6350 P1 2 .6600 Sig. 1.000 .414 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

Based on Type III Sum of Squares

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .001. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2.000. b Alpha = .05.

Lampiran 8. Hasil uji Anova kadar air berbagai perlakuan stabilisasi

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: Kadar_Air Source

Type III Sum

of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Corrected Model 2.450(a) 2 1.225 122.487 .001 Intercept 122.221 1 122.221 12222.107 .000 Perlakuan 2.450 2 1.225 122.487 .001 Error .030 3 .010 Total 124.701 6 Corrected Total 2.480 5 a R Squared = .988 (Adjusted R Squared = .980)

Post Hoc Test

Perlakuan

Homogeneous Subsets

Kadar_Air Duncan Perlakuan N Subset 1 2 3 P3 2 3.6300 P1 2 4.7900 P2 2 5.1200 Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

Based on Type III Sum of Squares

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .010. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2.000. b Alpha = .05.

Lampiran 9. Hasil uji Anova nilai aw berbagai perlakuan stabilisasi

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: aw Source

Type III Sum

of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Corrected Model .053(a) 2 .027 1597.000 .000 Intercept 1.510 1 1.510 90601.000 .000 Perlakuan .053 2 .027 1597.000 .000 Error 5.00E-005 3 1.67E-005

Total 1.563 6

Corrected Total .053 5 a R Squared = .999 (Adjusted R Squared = .998)

Post Hoc Test

Perlakuan

Homogeneous Subsets

aw Duncan Perlakuan N Subset 1 2 3 P1 2 .3700 P3 2 .5500 P2 2 .5850 Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

Based on Type III Sum of Squares

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 1.67E-005. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2.000.

Lampiran 10. Hasil uji Anova kelarutan dalam air berbagai perlakuan stabilisasi

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: Kelarutan Source

Type III Sum

of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Corrected Model 1.304(a) 2 .652 482.827 .000 Intercept 8.097 1 8.097 5997.642 .000 Perlakuan 1.304 2 .652 482.827 .000 Error .004 3 .001

Total 9.405 6

Corrected Total 1.308 5 a R Squared = .997 (Adjusted R Squared = .995)

Post Hoc Test

Perlakuan

Homogeneous Subsets

Kelarutan Duncan Perlakuan N Subset 1 2 P1 2 .5050 P2 2 1.4400 P3 2 1.5400 Sig. 1.000 .072 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

Based on Type III Sum of Squares

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .001. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2.000. b Alpha = .05.

Lampiran 11. Hasil uji Anova daya serap air berbagai perlakuan stabilisasi

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: DSA Source

Type III Sum

of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Corrected Model 14072.649(a) 2 7036.324 378.536 .000 Intercept 568617.421 1 568617.421 30590.126 .000 Perlakuan 14072.649 2 7036.324 378.536 .000 Error 55.765 3 18.588 Total 582745.835 6 Corrected Total 14128.414 5 a R Squared = .996 (Adjusted R Squared = .993)

Post Hoc Test

Perlakuan

Homogeneous Subsets

DSA Duncan Perlakuan N Subset 1 2 3 P1 2 252.0600 P2 2 301.3300 P3 2 370.1500 Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

Based on Type III Sum of Squares

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 18.588. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2.000.

Lampiran 12. Hasil uji Anova pengaruh karagenan terhadap viskositas

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: viskositas Source

Type III Sum

of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Corrected Model 8.094(a) 3 2.698 28.778 .004 Intercept 215.281 1 215.281 2296.333 .000 karagenan 8.094 3 2.698 28.778 .004 Error .375 4 .094 Total 223.750 8 Corrected Total 8.469 7

a R Squared = .956 (Adjusted R Squared = .923)

Post Hoc Test

Karagenan

Homogeneous Subsets

viskositas Duncan karagenan N Subset 1 2 3 .00 2 4.0000 .30 2 4.7500 4.7500 .45 2 5.2500 .60 2 6.7500 Sig. .070 .178 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

Based on Type III Sum of Squares

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = .094. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2.000. b Alpha = .05.

Lampiran 13. Formula yang disarankan beserta hasil responnya Std Run Component 1 A : karagenan % Component 2 B : tepung bekatul % Component 3 C : formula dasar % Response 1 warna sebelum diseduh (skor) Response 2 aroma sebelum diseduh (skor) Response 3 penampakan fisik sebelum diseduh (skor) Response 4 aroma setelah diseduh (skor) Response 5 rasa setelah diseduh (skor) Response 6 penampakan fisik setelah diseduh (skor) 5 1 0.25 16.84 82.91 8.306 7.133 8.14 8.7 7.147 7.213 14 2 0.25 16.84 82.91 8.363 6.406 8.336 8.853 7.356 7.786 4 3 0.385 12.865 86.75 8.456 7.2 8.28 9.433 7.223 7.343 13 4 0.52 16.57 82.91 7.083 6.826 7.353 9.246 6.2516 7.383 1 5 0.52 12.73 86.75 8.07 6.82 7.873 9.73 8.907 7.506 3 6 0.25 14.92 84.83 8.22 6.856 7.576 9.506 8.364 8.266 9 7 0.52 14.65 84.83 8.113 6.773 7.94 9.473 7.796 7.32 15 8 0.52 12.73 86.75 8.4 7.533 8.553 8.5 7.675 7.553 6 9 0.52 16.57 82.91 6.846 7.41 7.536 8.453 5.784 7.71 10 10 0.385 16.705 82.91 6.64 6.976 7.406 7.953 5 8.3 12 11 0.25 13 86.75 8.36 7.89 8.566 8.556 6.725 7.733 2 12 0.25 13 86.75 8.016 7.466 7.993 8.456 6.972 7.853 8 13 0.385 15.745 83.87 7.326 7.323 7.946 8.71 6.122 7.726 11 14 0.4525 13.7575 85.79 7.463 7.463 7.996 8.876 6.778 8.02 7 15 0.3175 13.8925 85.79 7.336 7.43 7.713 7.93 6.976 7.543

Lampiran 14. Formulir uji hedonik produk sebelum diseduh

Nama : Tanggal :

No. HP :

Produk : Susu yang disuplementasi tepung bekatul

Instruksi :

Dari sampel yang tersedia, nyatakan tingkat kesukaan Anda terhadap atribut yang telah ditentukan dengan cara memberikan garis vertikal dan kode sampel pada garis yang tersedia.

Penilaian

1. Warna

Sangat Sangat

tidak disukai disukai

2. Aroma

Sangat Sangat

tidak disukai disukai

3. Penampakan fisik

Sangat Sangat

tidak disukai disukai

Lampiran 15. Formulir uji hedonik produk setelah diseduh

Nama : Tanggal :

No. HP :

Produk : Susu yang disuplementasi tepung bekatul

Instruksi :

Dari sampel yang tersedia, nyatakan tingkat kesukaan Anda terhadap atribut yang telah ditentukan dengan cara memberikan garis vertikal dan kode sampel pada garis yang tersedia.

Penilaian

1. Aroma

Sangat Sangat

tidak disukai disukai

2. Rasa

Sangat Sangat

tidak disukai disukai

3. Penampakan fisik

Sangat Sangat

tidak disukai disukai

Lampiran 16. Fits summary respon warna sebelum diseduh

Sequential Model Sum of Squares [Type I] Source Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Value p-value Prob > F Mean vs Total 912.5688 1 912.5688 Linear vs Mean 2.1063888 2 1.0531944 3.8439822 0.0513

Quadratic vs Linear 1.9975432 3 0.6658477 4.6444422 0.0316 Suggested Sp Cubic vs Quadratic 0.1768337 1 0.1768337 1.270533 0.2923

Cubic vs Sp Cubic 0.8439664 3 0.2813221 5.2197286 0.0534 Suggested

Residual 0.2694796 5 0.0538959

Total 917.96301 15 61.197534

Lack of Fit Tests Source Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Value p-value Prob > F Linear 3.1444959 8 0.393062 10.969657 0.0174 Quadratic 1.1469527 5 0.2293905 6.4018795 0.0481 Suggested Special Cubic 0.970119 4 0.2425297 6.7685711 0.0454 Cubic 0.1261526 1 0.1261526 3.5206944 0.1338 Suggested Pure Error 0.143327 4 0.0358318

Model Summary Statistics Source Std. Dev. R-Squared Adjusted R-Squared Predicted R-Squared PRESS Linear 0.523436 0.390490566 0.2889057 0.0533661 5.1063439 Quadratic 0.3786349 0.760802914 0.6279156 0.3325132 3.6005649 Suggested Special Cubic 0.3730694 0.793585041 0.6387738 0.114402 4.7771031 Cubic 0.232155 0.950042814 0.8601199 -0.6595053 8.9517232 Suggested

Lampiran 17. ANOVA dan persamaan polinomial respon warna sebelum diseduh

Response 1 Warna sebelum diseduh

ANOVA for Mixture Cubic Model

*** Mixture Component Coding is L_Pseudo. ***

Analysis of variance table [Partial sum of squares - Type III]

Source Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Value p-value Prob > F Model 5.1247321 9 0.56941468 10.56507783 0.0092 significant Linear Mixture 2.1063888 2 1.0531944 19.5412609 0.0043 AB 0.0011485 1 0.0011485 0.021309602 0.8896 AC 0.0007558 1 0.00075583 0.014023931 0.9103 BC 0.1995015 1 0.19950152 3.701606599 0.1124 ABC 0.0013002 1 0.00130023 0.024124756 0.8826 AB(A-B) 0.0022771 1 0.00227705 0.042249058 0.8453 AC(A-C) 0.0007 1 0.0007 0.012987935 0.9137 BC(B-C) 0.55229 1 0.55228996 10.24734116 0.0240 Residual 0.2694796 5 0.05389593

Lack of Fit 0.1261526 1 0.12615264 3.520694392 0.1338 not significant Pure Error 0.143327 4 0.03583175

Cor Total 5.3942117 14

Final Equation in Terms of Actual Components: warna sebelum diseduh =

-237558.5971 * karagenan -1121.103908 * tepung bekatul

6.569048966 * formula dasar

4280.316627 * karagenan * tepung bekatul 3466.817783 * karagenan * formula dasar 19.28691357 * tepung bekatul * formula dasar

-29.77699209 * karagenan * tepung bekatul * formula dasar

19.69550712 * karagenan * tepung bekatul * (karagenan-tepung bekatul) 10.91822011 * karagenan * formula dasar * (karagenan-formula dasar)

Lampiran 18. Fits summary respon rasa

Sequential Model Sum of Squares [Type I] Source Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Value p-value Prob > F Mean vs Total 736.072791 1 736.0727912 Linear vs Mean 3.67661988 2 1.838309938 2.19644801 0.1539 Quadratic vs Linear 7.90817285 3 2.636057618 11.11121 0.0022 Suggested Sp Cubic vs Quadratic 0.20888053 1 0.208880526 0.86748586 0.3789 Cubic vs Sp Cubic 0.83697844 3 0.278992813 1.28057222 0.3764 Residual 1.0893287 5 0.217865739 Total 749.792772 15 49.98618477

Lack of Fit Tests Source Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Value p-value Prob > F Linear 9.12277863 8 1.140347329 4.954898 0.0696 Quadratic 1.21460578 5 0.242921156 1.05551135 0.4929 Suggested Special Cubic 1.00572526 4 0.251431314 1.09248865 0.4669 Cubic 0.16874682 1 0.168746817 0.73321807 0.4401 Pure Error 0.92058188 4 0.23014547

Model Summary Statistics Source Std. Dev. R-Squared Adjusted R-Squared Predicted R-Squared PRESS Linear 0.91484792 0.267975593 0.145971525 -0.16424623 15.9734355 Quadratic 0.48707604 0.844373855 0.757914885 0.54716873 6.21283618 Suggested Special Cubic 0.49070194 0.859598405 0.754297208 0.45289082 7.50632719 Cubic 0.4667609 0.920602751 0.777687703 -0.08121853 14.834297

Lampiran 19. ANOVA dan persamaan polinomial respon rasa

Response 5 Rasa setelah diseduh

ANOVA for Mixture Quadratic Model

*** Mixture Component Coding is L_Pseudo. ***

Analysis of variance table [Partial sum of squares - Type III]

Source Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Value p-value Prob > F Model 11.5847927 5 2.316958546 9.76617994 0.0020 significant Linear Mixture 3.67661988 2 1.838309938 7.74863481 0.0110 AB 3.89497979 1 3.894979791 16.4176755 0.0029 AC 3.58582055 1 3.585820545 15.1145426 0.0037 BC 1.36122936 1 1.361229355 5.73769904 0.0402 Residual 2.13518766 9 0.237243073

Lack of Fit 1.21460578 5 0.242921156 1.05551135 0.4929 not significant

Pure Error 0.92058188 4 0.23014547

Cor Total 13.7199804 14

Final Equation in Terms of Actual Components:

rasa setelah diseduh =

6397.749664 * karagenan -14.12400576 * tepung bekatul -0.409822254 * formula dasar

-66.77579881 * karagenan * tepung bekatul -64.04665285 * karagenan * formula dasar

Lampiran 20. Skor uji coba formula optimum dan uji hedonik produk komersil untuk parameter sebelum diseduh.

Panelis

Warna Aroma Penampakan fisik

Produk optimum Produk komersil Produk optimum Produk komersil Produk optimum Produk komersil 1 5.3 9.1 3.7 10.6 6.1 10.1 2 7.5 11.3 7.4 11.1 9.5 7.9 3 9.9 9.3 9.2 8.3 9.6 8.1 4 5.3 6.3 1.8 8.9 5.1 10.1 5 12.0 11.3 11.6 10.0 10.6 12.6 6 6.3 10.6 11.2 7.1 10.1 7.3 7 8.9 13.4 13.6 13.1 13.3 13.5 8 5.1 8.0 7.9 7.2 4.2 8.6 9 11.7 12.8 7.9 13.6 7.4 13.7 10 10.5 11.3 8.4 12.4 11.4 11.7 11 9.5 12.1 7.8 11.6 10.1 11.4 12 6.1 10.5 10.8 9.6 8.7 7.6 13 12.8 12.1 9.8 13.1 10.0 13.9 14 11.0 12.0 10.7 9.6 11.2 11.7 15 11.5 11.5 6.2 11.0 10.8 8.9 16 11.2 12.2 10.1 10.6 9.0 8.8 17 12.1 11.6 11.3 12.6 13.2 12.2 18 11.8 12.4 12.9 13.2 12.5 12.7 19 10.6 11.5 9.6 10.9 11.5 9.9 20 9.5 9.5 7.6 10.8 10.2 10.7 21 9.5 11.5 10.0 12.8 8.3 11.1 22 10.2 10.7 8.1 12.7 10.1 10.9 23 10.6 4.9 3.2 9.6 9.4 4.2 24 10.8 11.1 8.6 6.9 11.7 10.8 25 12.8 2.3 14.0 3.6 12.5 6.1 26 7.2 10.6 8.6 10.5 11.8 8.8 27 10.1 9.3 9.8 7.5 10.9 9.8 28 12.4 9.0 10.9 13.0 7.9 5.1 Rata-rata 9.7 10.3 9.0 10.4 9.9 9.9

Lampiran 21. Skor uji coba formula optimum dan uji hedonik produk komersil untuk parameter setelah diseduh

Panelis

Dokumen terkait