Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for
a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and
private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without
the permission of the Author.
AI{ EVALUATICN OF A
I4ANAGEMENT TMINING PROGRAJ"IVIE
A
thesis
pnesentedin partial ful-filnent of the
nequinementsfon the
degneeof
Doctonof
Philosophyin
Psychology atMassey Univensity
,Judith-Anne Bnook 1982
fcilo - Gr
I1
ABSTRACT
The
evaluation of
a managementtnaining
prognammefor
nesearchscientists
andsenior technicians
formedthe basis of this
applied nesearchpnoject.
Befone, du::ing andafter
measures were usedto
assess
the
knowledge,skills, attitudes
and work behaviounsof trainees
andcontrol
group membensin order to
comparethe
changeswhich oceumed as
a result of the programme.
Both fonmative and summative evaluation were incorporatedinto the
expenimental design andcareful attention
waspaid to internal
and extennalvalidity
issues
by the
useof
matchedcontnol
groups,multiple
measuresof the
dependent and independentvariables, including both objective
andsubjective
methods.self-neports
and neponts by tr"aineestsupeniors.
Repeated measu::esof
knowledge,skills, attitudes
and wonk behaviour:s were takenutilizing a longitudinal
design and someneplication
was conduetedwith other
groupsof
tnaineesat
othertimes.
Theplan of
appnoachinvolved
aninitial analysis of training
needs o examination
of the input to training including
course content andtraining
teehniques, immediate and longen tennevaluation of
subjectsf reactions to the
pnogramme and an assessmentof the
outcomesof tnaining.
Outcomeevaluation
compnised measunesof
effectivenessat both
immediate andintermediate levels with
measurements taken immediately andat thr:ee, six
and twelve monthsfollowing training.
Effectiveness was assessed
in relation to the
goals determined duringthe
preliminanyanalysis of tnaining
needs,the
focusshifting
gnadually
during the
cour"seof evaluation
fnom an emphasis onlearning effects to
changesin
wonk behavioun and penformance.Formative
evaluation in the
formof
feedbackto
coursecontrollers
was pnovided thnoughout whil-e
the
summativeevaluation
consistedof
afinal
neportingof the effectiveness of the training
pr"ogr:amme oven atwelve month peniod and
the
consisteneyof results
fnoma
subsequent sampleof tnainees.
A model was suggestedto
enablethe
fonmative and summative aspectsof evaluation to
proceed simultaneouslywithin a single study. Finally,
by monitoringthe effects of
envinonmentalfactons, the
wr"iten wasable to
beginto
disti.ngrrishthe
modenatorvaniables openating
at various levels of evaluation
and move towandsconstruct validation of a theonetical
rnodelof training
and evaluation.1 l-1
ACI(NO,tLEDGEI4E,ITS
I
wishto
thank Pnofesson Geonge Shouksmithfo:r his
supenvision andconstructive cniticism
throughoutthis
pnoject.I
wouldalso like to
acknowledgethe
suppont given by othen membersof the
Psychology Depantment at_MasseyUnivensity, panticulanly
Mn Mike Smith whose
intenest in the p::oject
and adviceas
second supenvisor was rnuchappniciated,
and Dn Dave Clanke who provided assistance and suggestionsin the initial stages.
Sincene thanks ane dueto
Ms Manganet-Many Oulaghan and MsGail
Tyson who had thedifficult task of typing the final
manuscnipt, and membensof
the Psychology Depantmentoffice staff, ineluding
MsAlison
Stewanto whoassisted with the
pnepanation.Final1y, I
wouldlike to
thank Dn Richand Br:ookfor his
assistancewith the analysis of data,
and othen membensof
myfamily fon their.
tole::ance and patience.Abstnact
Acknowledgements
Chapten 1.
Chapten 2.
Chaoter- 3.
TABLE OF CCNTENTS
The evaluation process
t.t fntroduction
t.2 Brief histony
anddefinitions of
evaluation1.3 Some expenimental design pnoblems
evaluation
neseanchA
theonetical
modelof
evaluation2.t
The Wontnan model2.2
evaluation
3.3 Critenion
development3.4
Tnainingevaluation
methodology1n
l't 1.r-a
13 13 Page
15 16
t7
18
20 2L 22 25 26 27
37 38 43 The
3.1 3.2
2.7.1
Formative and summativeevaluation
2.7.2 Validity
issues2.7.3 Political
considenations2.7.4 Ethics
andconfidentiality 2.1.5
Randonization and quasi-expenimental design
2.1.6
Measu:rementof
vaniables Adecision - theoretic
appnoach2.2.1
Theplace of value
judgements2.2.2 Subjectivity
2.2.3 Panticipant -
obsenvation technologyof tnaining
evaluationIntroduction
A
pnactical
fnamewonkfon
evaluationof
managementtnaining
3.2.1,
Problem-centnedtraining 3.2.2
Thecycle of
evaluation3.2.3
The discovery approachto
29 29
31 33 33
Chapten 4.
Chapten 5.
Chapten 6.
5.3
Intnoduction
to the
pnesent research4.1
Backgroundto the evaluation
study4.2
Afunsof the
pnesent nesearch Preliminany studies5.1
Intnoduction5.2 Identifying tnaining
needs5.2.1
Subjects5.2.2
Measu::ing instnument5.2.3
Procedune5.2.4
Results5.2.5
Discussion5.2.6 Inten-nater reliability 5.2.7
ConclusionsConstr:uction
of attitude
scaLe5.3.1
Subjects5.3.2 Attitude scale
development5.3.3
Concluding comments6.4
65 65 66 66 68 70 72 75 81 85 86 88 88 90 Page
50
.50
57
103 103
104 104 Overview
of
expenimentaldesign
926
.1 Intr:oduction
926.2 Subjects
936.3 Methods
976.3.1
Contextevaluation
986.3.2 Pre-test measures
986.3.3
Reactionsevaluation
996.3.4
Imnediate outcomeevaluation
996.3.5
Intenmediate outcomeevaluation
1016.3.6 Ultimate
outcomeevaluation
tO26.3.7
Extennalvalidity
andnetiability
of
scales Concluding comrnentsEvaluation
of
irnmediate outcomes7.1
Intnoduction Chapter 7.7.2
Reasonsfon attending
counses7.3
Expected aneasof
onganizational andpensonal change
7.4
Traineesr assessmentof
sessions7.5
Evaluationof
coursetopics 7.6
Tnaining techniques prefer-ned7.7
Changesin attitudes
towands thesection
leaden noleFo11ow-up studies
8.1
Intnoduction8.2
Evaluationof
intenmediate outcomes8.2.1 Effects of
work penformanceaften
thnee months8.2.2 Areas of organizational
andPage
105
to7
110
Lt2
722
725
130 130 130
130
Chapten 8.
Chapten 9.
8.2.3 8.2.4 8.2. 5
personal
change
!37Allocation of time to topics
140Indirect
measuresof effectiveness
142Penceived understanding and
nelevance
of topics
8.2.6
Changesin
behaviouraften six
months
- traineest report 8.2.7
Changesin
behaviounaften six
months
-
supenionsf neport8.2.8
Onganizationalclinate
8.2.9
Twelve monthfollow-up
study8.3
Surnmarryof findings
Case studies
9.1 Introduction 9.2
Aimof
studies9.3
The nepertonygnid
technique9.4
Method9.5
Results and discussion9.5.1
Case study A9.5.2
Case study B145
150
160 165 173 t76
180 180 180 181
t82
18s
t87
191
9.5.3
Case9.5.4
Case9.5.5
Case9.5.6
Case9.6
ConclusionsChapten
10. Replication studies
21010.1 Introduction
2tO7O.2 Aim
2!310.3 Subjeets
21310.4 Procedune
21310.5 Results
21,410.5.1
Reasonsfon
attendingcourses
21410.5.2 Training
techniquespnefenned
27510.5.3 Attitude scale
21610.5.4
Performanceaften three months
2Lg10.5.5 Allocation of time to topics
2I910.5.6 Indirect
measunesof effectiveness
22010.5.7
Undenstandingof topics
22210.5.8
Onganizationclimate
guestionnaine 22510.5.9 Effects of
age, tenur:e andleadenship
experience
22710.6 Discussion
22710.6.1
Reasonsfon attending courses
22810.6.2
Tnaining techniquespnefenned
22810.6.3 Attitude scale
22810.6.4
Perfor:manceaften
thneemonths
22910.6.5 Allocation of
tfuneto topics
23010.6.6 Indirect
measuresof effectiveness
23110.6.7
Understandingof topics
23t10.6.8
Onganizationclimate
questionnaine 23210.6.9 Effects of
age, tenune andleadenship expenience
tO.7
Conclusions232 232
study C study D study E
siudy
FPage
19s 198 201.
204 207
Chapten
11.
Theeffectiveness of the tnaining
coursestt.t
Intnoductiontl.2
Contextof tnaining
11.3 Ultimate objectives of training 11.4
Tnaining input11.5
hunediate outconesof tnaining 11.6
Intermediate outcomesof tnaining
!1.7
0nganizational envinonment1L.8
Reactionsto training 11.9 Training
techniques 11.10 ConclusionChapter
12.
Conclusions concerningevaluative
r:esearchPage
23s 235 235 237 239 241, 242 248 25L 255 2s6
257
Figune
2.t
2.2 3.1 8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 9.9 9.10
LIST OF FIGURES
Wontmanrs model
of evaluation
r"esearch Pnocessevaluation
asa
feedback loop Tnaining/evaluationcontrol
system Changesin
understandingof topics
at thneetimes, pre-tesa (tf),
immediatepost-test (t^)
and thnee nonths(t^) 'zc
Avenage numben
of
behavioun changes (1)attempted and
(2)
implemented, bytnainees and contnols
Number
of
behavioun changes madein
each behavioural category expnessed asa
propontionof subjects in the
group Summaryprofiles of
onganizationalclimate fon
govennment and semi- government onganizat ionsSumnary
profiles of
onganization climatefon
leadens and non-leadersDendnognam
of
elementsfon
Case ADendnog:ram
of
constnuctsfor
Case ADendnogram
of
elementsfor
Case BDendnognam
of
constnuctsfon
Case BDendnognam
of
elementsfon
Case CDendrognam
of
constnuctsfon
Case CDendrognam
of
elementsfon
Case DDendnognam
of
constnuctsfor
Case D Dendnognamof
elementsfor:
Case EDendrognam
of constructs fon
Case E14 15 32 Page
149
153
159
169
169 787 189
t92
193 195 196 198 199 202 203
Figune Page
9.11
Dendnognamof
elementsfon
CaseF
2049.t2
Dendnogramof constructs fon
CaseP
20610.1
Changesin
r:ndenstandingof topics
atthnee
times, pne-test (t1),
immediatepost-test (tr)
andthree
nonths(tr)
2231,0.2
Summanypr.ofiles of
onganizationalclimate fon
government and semi-government
onganizations
22610.3
Sunmanypnofiles of
onganizationalclftnate fon
leadens andnon-leadens
226tI.7
Thecycle of evaluation including
moderator
vaniables
236!2.1
Genenalcnitenion
modelof
managenial
effectiveness
259t2.2
Decision-making modelof evaluation
266LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
3.1
Tnainingevaluation
schemesof
Hamblin andWanr,
Bird
andRackham
344.1
The seven phasesof the
pnesent evaluationstudv
59-645.1
Subjects whotook pant in
precourseinterviews
685.2
Numbenof
responsesin ten
categoriesof
managementby
four" sub-groupsof
respondents
5.3
Numbenof
nesponsesin five
categoniesof
pensonal and groupnelationships
by foun sub-gltoupsof
nespondents5.4
The fnequencyof incidents
placedin
categonies bythe
two judges6.1
Subjectsinvolved in
main evaluation study categonizedby
guouPs (nows) andtypes of
employing onganization (colunns)6.2
Biognaphical chanactenisticsof
subjeetsin all
groups6.3
Average ages, tenure and leadenship expenienceof
tnainees and contnolgr3oup
membens
967.1 Pre-test
responsesto
question concenningreasons
fon attending counses
1067.2
Subjectsr nank ordeningof
aneasof
onganizational change
expected
1097.3
Subjectsr nank ondeningof
aneasof
pensonal change
expected
109'7.4
Changesin
penceived understanding andnelevance
following tnaining
11574
81
85
94
95
TabIe Page
7.5
Medians and chi-squaresof
nesults obtained onthe
perceived undenstandingand nelevance
scales
1187.6
Nunber:of
subjects whoindicated
pre- ferencefon
eachof six types of
tnaining methods
7237.7
Means and standarddeviations of attitude scale
scores obtainedby
expenimental andcontnol
groupsubjects
1277.8
Results obtained whenattitude
scalescones
are
companedfon different groups
1288.1
Numbenof
tnainees whoindicated
changesin
wonkbehaviour
7328.2
Numbenof
behavioun changesspeeified
byindividual
counse membensafter
thneemonths
1338.3
Subjectsr nank ondeningof
aneasof
onganizational change
following tnaining
1388.4
Subjectsr nank ondeningof
aneasof
pen-sonal change most
affected by
thetnaining cour.ses
1398.5
Subjectsr pnefenencesfon time allocation
to
counsetopics
1418.6
Changesin tnaineesr
per:ceptionsof
unden-standing and nelevance
of topics
studiedduning
tr:aining
1478.7
Numberof
subjeets whoindicated
behavioural changefollowing tnaining
courses
1538.8
Retnospective change behaviour reponted bysubjects six
monthsaften training peniod
15trTabIe Page
8.9
Ther:elation
between irnrnediate measuresof attitude
change andlonger
tenm changescore
at six months
1558.10
Relationships between wonk behaviour andage,
tenure and expenienceof
Group A andB
subjects
1578.11
Conrelation between fnequencyof
change andage,
tenune andexpenience
1588.12
Table showing numberof
rrYesrr,
rrNort andtrDontt Knowrr responses made
by
four:teencontrolling officers
aboutthein
sub-ondinatesr wonk
behavioun
1648.13
Medians and nangesof natings
madeby
sub- groupsof subjects (tnaining
Gnoups A andB, cornbined) t7t
8.14
Gnoup means and standarddeviations of
tnaining effectiveness
on thneescales
t7510.1
Modal nankingsof
neasonsfon
attendancegiven
bytnaining
groupmembers
2tstO.2 Attitude
scale means and standanddeviations fon
gnoupsA,
B C and Dat
t:Lmes, befone
(tr)
and immediately aften(t,, z
) tnaining
2t710.3
Numbenof
tnainees whoindicated change
2!810.4
Numbenof
changesspecified by individual
course mernbens
aften
thneemonths
?"n
10.5
Subjectsr pneferencefo:r
amountof tine
allocated
to'counsetopics
22O10.6
Subjects who read booksnelated to
counsetopics
22!Table Page
tO.7
Subjects who discussed counsewith
workcolleagues
22!10.8
Subjects who maintainedcontact
withother
counsemernbens
22210.9
Numbenof positive
changesin
undenstandingof
coursetopics fon
gnoupsA, B,
C andD
22410.10 T statistics
obtained using Fniedmanfstest
onsubjectsr
nank ondeningof level of
undenstanding
of topics
22410.11
Medians and rangesof natings
made by GnoupC and D tnainees on
the climates within
thein onganizations
225LO.I2 Relationship
between wonk behavioun andage,
tenure and experienceof
Gnoup C andD
subjects
227Numben
of
nesponges, mean score and nangeon each
cnitenion
26gRank-ordening
of
session assessments oneach
cnitenion
269Ia
Ib
Appendix
III
VII
VIII II
LTST OF APPEI{DICES
Results
of
session assessment fonmsof section
7.4Analysis of
nepentonygnid
dataof
chapten 9
Six
rnonthfollow-up
questionnaine fon tnainees andcontrol
subjectsSix
rnonthfollow-up
guestionnaine fon contnol-Iingofficens
IX
X
Twelve nonth follow-up questionnair"e
Page
268
270
287
289
293 IV
V
Pnecounse intenviews and questionnaines 275
Session assessment fonm 280
Immediate
post
counse questionnaines 28!Three month fol1ow-up questionnaine 284
VI
The