• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

(2)PAGE 2 REASONS FOR THE DECISION:  Section 4.15 (EP&A Act) – Satisfactory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "(2)PAGE 2 REASONS FOR THE DECISION:  Section 4.15 (EP&A Act) – Satisfactory"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

PAGE 1 MINUTES OF THE DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING HELD AT THE HILLS SHIRE COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, 12 NOVEMBER 2019

PRESENT

Cameron McKenzie Group Manager – Development & Compliance (Chair)

Robert Buckham Principal Executive Planner (New Release & Growth Centres) Benjamin Hawkins Manager – Subdivision & Development Certification

Angelo Berios Manager – Environment & Health Craig Woods Manager – Regulatory Services Nicholas Carlton Manager – Forward Planning

APOLOGIES

Paul Osborne Manager – Development Assessment Kristine McKenzie Principal Executive Planner

TIME OF COMMENCEMENT 4:00pm

TIME OF COMPLETION 4:07pm

ITEM-1 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

RESOLUTION

The Minutes of the Development Assessment Unit Meeting of Council held on 29 October 2019 be confirmed.

ITEM-2 DA 1355/2019/HA - A HOME BUSINESS (ACUPUNCTURE AND MASSAGE) - LOT 13 DP 222378, 39 CHRISTOPHER STREET, BAULKHAM HILLS

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF THE DETERMINATION PURSUANT TO ITEM 2(2)(c) AND (d) OF SCHEDULE 1 OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING 7 ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979

DECISION:

The application be approved subject to conditions as set out in the report.

(2)

PAGE 2 REASONS FOR THE DECISION:

 Section 4.15 (EP&A Act) – Satisfactory.

 The Hills LEP 2012 – Satisfactory.

 DCP Part B Section 2 – Satisfactory.

HOW COMMUNIT VIEWS WERE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN MAKING THE DECISION:

The development application was notified and five (5) submissions including a petition were received. The issues raised were discussed in the report.

ITEM-3 DA 2337/2018/LD/D – SECTION 4.55(1A) MODIFICATION TO AN APPROVED THREE STOREY DWELLING, INGROUND SWIMMING POOL AND RETAINING WALLS – LOT 5 DP 286704, NO. 18 BERNABEAU STREET, NORTH KELLYVILLE

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF THE DETERMINATION PURSUANT TO ITEM 20(2)(c) AND (d) OF SCHEDULE 1 OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING & ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979

DECISION:

The Section 4.55(1A) Modification Application be refused on the following grounds:

1. The development does not comply with Section 4.55(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979in that the development is not considered to be substantially the same development as originally approved because it introduced non-compliances with height and site coverage providing a building with unreasonable bulk and scale.

2. The development’s height does not comply with the SEPP (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006 height of building requirements and as a result impacts on surrounding development through increased bulk and scale, overshadowing and privacy (Section 4.15(1)(b) and (c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979). A Clause 4.6 variation has not been submitted in support of the height of building variation.

3. The development’s bulk and scale, overshadowing and impacts on privacy impact on neighbouring properties and on the aesthetic values of the locality. (Section 4.15(1)(c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979).

4. The development does not comply with the site coverage of the North Kellyville Precinct Development Control Plan 2018 (Section 4.15(1)(a)(iii) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979).

5. The development is not suitable for the site as it will not provide a satisfactory relationship between the built form and adjoining properties. (Section 4.15(1)(c) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979).

6. The development is considered not to be in the public interest as it contravenes with the relevant DCP standard. (Section 4.15(a)(i), and (e) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979).

(3)

PAGE 3 REASONS FOR THE DECISION:

 Section 4.15 (EP&A Act) – Unsatisfactory – see report

 Section 4.55(1A) (EP&A Act) – Unsatisfactory - see report

 SEPP Growth Centres – Unsatisfactory.

HOW COMMUNITY VIEWS WERE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN MAKING THE DECISION:

The development application was notified and no submissions were received.

Please note:

A late submission was received by a resident which was tabled and discussed at the meeting.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

PAGE 1 MINUTES OF THE DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT UNIT MEETING HELD AT THE HILLS SHIRE COUNCIL ON TUESDAY, 25 NOVEMBER 2014: PRESENT Cameron McKenzie Group Manager Environment &

The researcher found that virtual-motivation among tenth grades students at SMA IT Al-Ishlah Maros was important to engage them in learning English through online teaching.. Most of