• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Social Impact Assessment for Disaster Recovery Planning

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "Social Impact Assessment for Disaster Recovery Planning"

Copied!
26
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

ESTABLISHING THE CONTEXT:

Social Impact Assessment for

Disaster Recovery Planning

Dr Yetta Gurtner

Orchid ID : orcid.org/0000-0002-7830-6718

(2)

• Disaster management and recovery

• Project/research rationale

• Parallels between disaster recovery and SIA objectives

• The framework/process

• Challenges

Overview

(3)

• Mitigation/Risk Reduction/Prevention

• Preparedness/Readiness

• Response

• Recovery

Ideally proactive

Disaster Management

Adapted from EMA (2003) and Standards Association of Australia (2004)

(4)
(5)

• Effective community/local assessment “post- disaster”

• Informed decision making for sustainable redevelopment

“Build back better, stronger and safer”

Rationale

(6)

• Limit losses

• Reduce suffering

• Restore psycho-social and economic viability of the community

• Sustainable redevelopment

• Disaster Risk Reduction

Community Disaster Recovery

(7)

• The systematic analysis in advance of development or policy changes that will bring social change to a community

• Development of community resilience;

• A social justice approach;

• Anticipating consequences;

• Better informed decisions;

• Maximising opportunities; and

• Minimizing negative outcomes

Social Impact Assessment

(8)

• Identify potential change/impacts

• Measure baseline data

• Examine social implications

• Actions

• Communicate changes

• Enhance positive and mitigate negative impacts

• Monitor and evaluate

SIA Process

(9)

• Identify potential impacts/change - Direct/indirect,

- Tangible/intangible

Scoping

(10)

• Data collection (baseline variables) - Determine event/hazard context - Establish local community data - Identify key stakeholders

- Identify existing resources and capacity - Rapid appraisal – damage and loss

- Basic needs assessment/priorities

Establish the Context

(11)

• Psycho-social

• Economic

• Infrastructure

• Environment

Community Variables

(12)

• Safety and wellbeing

• Vulnerable/marginalised groups

• Health – physical and mental

• Demographic change

• Human resources/skills

• Culture/values

• Governance/networks

Social/Psychosocial

(13)
(14)

• Individuals

• Employment

• Livelihoods

• Businesses

• Economic sectors

• Resources – savings, investments, insurance

• Government

Economic

(15)
(16)

• Residential – shelter/housing

• Rural assets

• Lifeline Utilities – water, sewage, electricity

• Infrastructure

• Transport networks

• Commercial/Industrial

• Public building and assets

Built Environment

(17)
(18)

• Biodiversity and ecosystems

• Amenities value

• Waste/pollution

• Natural resources

• Land-use

• Geo-physical change

• Debris management

Natural Environment

(19)
(20)

Immediate Actions

• Identify immediate needs for services

• Access available services and resources

• Coordinate recovery resources and services

• Support service providers

• Interventions

(21)

• Needs

• Priorities

• Opportunities

• Public support/participation

• Planning

• Policy

• Decision making – protect, accommodate, retreat

Communication and change

(22)

Capacity building

• Community/stakeholder engagement

• Integration and partnerships

• Resilience

• Adaptive capacity

• Resources

• Commitment

(23)

Sustainable Redevelopment

• Monitor

• Review

• Evaluate

• Educate and adapt

• Disaster Risk Reduction

(24)

Challenges

• Context dependant

• Credible/timely information

• Effective communication

• Flexibility/adaptable

• Ethics

• Transparency/accountability

• Uncertainty

(25)
(26)

QUESTIONS?

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

promote planning for long-term resilience, enhance health system responsiveness; and increase communication and community engagement activities. The process for development of

Social workers enable to play a potentially key role in disaster recovery by facilitating community development, restoring livelihoods, providing psychosocial support, and building

Based on Rothman’s 1995 work, Table 9.2 illustrates Characteristics Locality development Social planning policy Social action Direction Community change due to tourism should be

Any individual or community which suspects health impacts from a development policy, project or activity, as well as any local administrative organization which wants to use or learn

The students challenged the traditional learning process by collectively deciding to change the course institute and engaging with the community in pursuing social justice and anti-

A CASE OF FADAMA II IN ADAMAWA STATE, NIGERIA Madu Umar Adamu Faculty of Social Sciences UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA SARAWAK Key Words: Fadama II, Effect, Community-driven development,

The main actors involved in the post disaster recovery stage are national planning agency, recovery agency, national and local government, civic community and the NGOs [10].. In

This document introduces Dell Hymes' framework for ethnographic communication, which provides a systematic approach to understanding and effectively communicating in different social