Changes in Sanit ation - 01839.pdf - SAU Institutional Repository

On the basis of sanitation condition the respondents were classified into five categories

as shown in

Table 4.34.

A paired t test was employed to compare the difference of sanitation condition between pre and post Dipshikha period under both approaches. The findings indicated that there was a significant difference in sanitation condition between pre and post Dipshikha

period

under both approaches at 95 percent confidence level (P<0.000) (Table 4.34).

The score of sanitation condition of the respondents ranged from l to 4 and the average was 3.25 with a standard deviation of 1.04 in post Dipshikha period while the score ranged from l to 4 and the average was 1.95 with a standard deviation of 1.10

in

pre Dipshikha period under family development approach. On the other hand, under group based approach, the score of sanitation condition ranged from 1 to 5 in both post and pre Dipshikha period. The average was 2.48 with a standard deviation of 1.54 in post Dipshikha period while, the average was 1.38 with a standard deviation of 0.98 in pre Dipshikha period under GBA.

P<0.000 1%

1.04 3.25 100 100%

56%

P<0.000 1.10

1.95 100 100%

0 0%

10%

The table 4.34 revealed that user of open place, pit latrine and sanitary latrine without fence reduced from 53 percent to 13 percent, 9 percent to 5 percent and 28 percent to 26 percent respectively while, the user of sanitary latrine with fence increased from IO percent to 56 percent after involvement with Dipshikha in FDA On the other hand, still 51 percent of the respondents use open places for sanitation which was 85 percent in pre Dipshikha period under GBA. The user of pit latrine reduced as well from 4 percent to l percent while, the user of sanitary latrine with fence increased from 10 percent to 45 percent in post Dipshik.ha period under GBA. The brick latrine user increased as well in post Dipshikha period under GBA from 1 percent to 3 percent. None of the respondents had brick latrine under FDA From the fact, it is clear that the sanitation condition of the respondents improved after involvement with Dipshikha under both approaches.

The change scores in sanitation condition of the respondents

ranged

from 0 to 3 in both approaches. The average change was 1.30 with a standard deviation of 1.34 under FDA and the average was 1.10 with a standard deviation of 1.40 in GBA. The respondents were classified into four categories on the basis of changes in sanitation condition as shown in table 4.35.

1.54 45 10%

26%

26 28%

45%

0 0%

0.98 1.38 100 100%

JO 0 4

s

9 9%

SI 51%

85 85%

13%

13 53 53%

(/)

2.48 100 100%

3 (/) O/o

(/) O/o

Pre-Dipshikha Pre-Dipshikha Post Dipshikha

Period Period Period

4.34 Distribution of Respondent Families according to their Sanitation Condition between Pre and Post Di shikba Period under FDA aod GBA

the effectiveness ofGBA on changes in sanitation condition of the respondents.

researcher concluded that there was no difference between the effectiveness of FDA and condition in FDA and GBA at 95 percent confidence level (Table 4.35). So, the was higher than 0.05, there was no significant difference between change of sanitation changes of sanitation condition of the respondents under FDA and GBA. As the P value An independent sample t- test was employed to compare the difference between the fell under little and moderate change in their sanitation condition after involvement with eoderete change categories respectively while only 3 percent and 4 percent from OBA Eleven percent and 10 percent of the respondents from FDA fell under little and condition after involvement with Dipshikha under both approaches.

involvement with Dipshikha while, 33 percent of the respondents had high change in lbe respondents under both approaches had no change in their sanitation condition after The data presented in table 4.35 indicated that the highest proportion (46% and 60%) of

P= 0.304 Si nificance

l.40 1.34

J.10 1.30

Mean

100 100%

Total

33 33%

High Change (Score increased up to 3 )

4 4%

10 10%

Moderate change ( Score increased u to 2

3 3%

II I 1%

Little change (Score increased u to I

60 60%

46 46%

No Changes status uo)

% Frequency O/o (/) Frequency

(/)

was

employed to compare the difference of awareness on health between pre and post Dipshikha period under both approaches. The findings indicated that there was a significant difference in awareness issues between pre and post Dipshikha period under

both 4.36).

1.40 7.00 P<0.000

1.57 2.48 7.36

2.65

100 100%

6% 83

6 1%

15%

15 19%

75 75%

21 21%

20 20%

2 75%

75 79 79%

O/o (/)

(/)

Awareness (Up 4 to 3

83%

(/)

1.24 Pre-Dipshikha

Period

% (/)

basis of

their awareness on health as shown

in

table 4.36.

0 Changes in Awareness on Health

An independent sample t- test was employed to compare the difference between the changes of health awareness of the respondents under FDA and OBA. As the P value was higher than 0.05, there was no significant difference between change of health The data presented in table 4.37 indicated that maximum 51 percent of the respondents bad high change in health awareness under FDA while minimum 4 percent had little change. More than one fourth percent of the respondents had moderate change where

only

12 percent had extreme change in their health awareness. Seven percent of the respondents fell under no change category under family development approach while, only 3 percent of the respondents from GBA had no change in their health awareness.

The maximum 33 percent of the respondents had high change in OBA followed by 3J percent of moderate change. Sixteen percent of the respondents had little change in their health awareness in post Dipshikha period compared to pre Dipshikha period where I 7 percent had extreme change under group based approach.

Family Development Group Based

A roach A roach

(/)

61 61% 16 16% 61 61% 12 12%

34 34% 29 29% 38 38% 12 12%

>3 5 5% 55 55% l% 76 76%

100 100% JOO 100% 100 100% 100 100%

J.15 3.39 1.04 3.82

1.18 t.63 1.02 1.SS

P<0.000 P<0.000

Pre-Dipshikha Post Dipshikha

Categories Period Period

Table 4.38 Distribution of Respondent Families according to their Awareness on Different Social Issues Between Pre and Post Di shikba Period under FDA and GBA

11 Changes in Awareness on Social Issues

score of social awareness of the respondents ranged from 0 to 5 both in pre and post

· hikha period. The average was 3.39 with a standard deviation of 1.63 in post hikha period while, the average was 1.15 with a standard deviation of 1.18 in pre Dipshikha period under FDA. On the other hand, under GBA, the score of social awareness ranged from 0 to 5 and 0 to 4 in post and pre Dipshikha period respectively.

The

average was 3.82 with a standard deviation of 1.55 in post Dipshikha period while,

die

average was 1.04 with a standard deviation of I .02 in pre Dipshikha period under

GBA.

The respondents were classified into three categories on the basis of their awareness on social issues as shown in table 4.38.

ness in Family development approach and group based approach at 95 percent dence level (Table 4.37). So, the researcher concluded that there was no difference n the effectiveness of FDA and the effectiveness of GBA on changes in sanitation ition oftbe respondents.

The

data presented in table 4.39 showed that maximum 31 percent of the respondents bad moderate change in their social awareness after involvement with Dipshikha under maximum 36 percent respondents under GBA had high change in their

1.49 2.78 p

=

0.006

1.30 2.24 Mean

100% 100

100 100%

Total

18% 28

18 28%

Extreme change (score increased above 3

36 24%

High Change (score increased 24

u to 3 ) 36%

17%

31% 17 Moderate change ( score 31

increased u to 2

15% 8

15 8%

Little change (score increased u to I)

11 12%

12 11%

No Changes (status uo)

Frequency O/o

(/)

Frequency

(/) %

Group Based A roach Family Development

A roach Categories

s·

^niJicance

Changes in Awareness on Social Issues (Score)

able 4.39 Salient Features on the Effectiveness of FDA and GBA of Dipsbikba on Social Awareness

change scores in social awareness of the respondents ranged from 0 to 5 in both aches. The average change was 2.24 with a standard deviation of 1.30 under FDA 'le, the average was 2. 78 with a standard deviation of J .49 in GBA. The respondents classified into five categories on the basis of changes in social awareness as shown paired t test was employed to compare the difference of awareness on social issues n pre and post Dipshikha period under both approaches. The findings indicated there was a significant difference in awareness on social issues between pre and post

· · a period under both the approaches at 95 percent confidence level (P<0.000) Ible 4.38). It means the activities of Dipshikha concerning increase of awareness on nt social issues had made a significant impact among the beneficiaries of ndents under low and medium awareness categories reduced as well after lvement with Dipshikha under GBA.

The score of women empowerment of the respondents ranged from 0 to 7 both in pre and post Dipshik:ha period. The average score was 3.96 with a standard deviation of 1 .91 in post Dipshikha period while, the average was 1.84 with a standard deviation of 1 .80 in

pre

Dipshikha period under FDA. On the other hand, under OBA, the score of awareness on health ranged from 0 to 7 in post Dipshikha period and 0 to 6 in pre Dipshikha period. The average was 4.27 with a standard deviation of 1 .91 in post Dipshik:ha period while, the average was 1.91 with a standard deviation of 1 .76 in pre Dipshikha period under OBA. The respondents were classified into three categories on the basis of their empowerment as shown in table 4.40.

Dalam dokumen 01839.pdf - SAU Institutional Repository (Halaman 105-112)