TABLE OF CONTENT S
In nova tive Agroindustrial a nd Business System E ngineering
Thc Feasibility Study of Establishment of Biodiesel And Paving Block I- I
Industry From Spent Bleaching Earth
Febriani Purba, An.i Suryani and Sukardi
Green Supply Chain Management Innovation Diffusion in Crumb Rubber 1-7
Factories: Designing Strategies towards Implementation
Tri Susanto, Marimin Marimin and Suprihatin
Mobile Business Analytics System for Service Level Analysis of Customer 1- 13
Relationship Decision
Taufik Djama and Yudhistira Chandra 8ayu
Exploring an lnnovative Approach to Address Non-Tariff Barriers 1- 19
Experienced by Small to Medium Enterprises in Downstream Coffee
Production in Indonesia
Andar Hennawan, Yandra Arkeman. Titi Candra Sunani
An
Analys is of innovation Network Performance on the Palm Oil Industry 1-26
in North Sumatera
Danang Krisna Yudha, Aji Hennawan and Machfud
Exploring the Internationalization Process Model of an Indonesian Product 1-33
- C:lse study: Fruit Chips SME's
Dickie Sulistya Apriliyanto. Hartrisari Hardjomidjojo. Titi C Sunarti
Innovation Management in Indonesian Palm Oil Industry
1-39
Karim Abdullah. Aji Hcnnawan and Yandra Arkeman
Technology Innovation Adoption to Improve the Pcrfomlanee of Dairy 1-45
Small-Medium Enterprises (SME): Case study in Pangalcngan-Bandung
Regency, West Java, Indonesia
Nuni Novita."ari. Titi Candm Sunarti and Nastiti Siwi Indrasti
Managing Innovation through Knowledge Sharing in An Indonesia Coconut 1-54
SME
Muchammad Kodiyat P. Maebfud, Nastiti S Indrasti
Increasing Added Value of Banana by Producing Synbiotic Banana "Sale"
1-60
Using Innovation
&
Technology Strategy Approach
Eka Ruriani
An
AHP Application for Selecting A Business Innovation Strategy of 1-65
Chocolate SMEs in East Java
Yani Kanika Pcniwi, M. Syamsul Maarif and Maehfud
Understanding local food consumers and their motivations: A case srudy in 1-71
Padang city
Poppy Arsil
Spatial Model Design for Competitive Improvement of Small Medium 1-77
Scales Enterprises (Case Study: Boger Area)
Hanrisari Hardjomidj ojo. Harry Im:mtho and Armaiki Yusmur
System Analysis and Design for
sセャ・」エゥョァ@Chitin and Chilosan Industry
1-82
Location
by
Using Comparative Performance Index Method
Dena Sismaraini. Naslili S. Indrasti and Taufik Djatna
Arduino-Based Tempcrature
Monitoring
Device
for
Cold Chain 1-90
Delmar Zakaria Firdaus and Endang Warsiki
Devdopment of Downstream Cocoa Industry: Exploring the Role of f-95
Govemment and Small and Medium Industry in Partnership
Farda Eka Kusumawardana, Yandra Arkeman,
Titi C
Sunarti
The Role ofComnmnicarion in the T ccnnology Transfer Process
1- 101
Anindita Dibyono. Sukardi , Machfud
The Center for Pulp and Paper Appraising its Productivity
IIIGenerating
1-108
Industry-Applicable Research: A Good Practice Illustration
Ahmad Rudh Firdausi. Anas
M
Fauzi. Machfud
Frontier Approaches in Process and Bioprocess Engineering
Identification of Flavor Compounds In Ccmcem
(Spondia=pinata
(LF)
11- 1
Kurz) Leaf Extra
Luh Putu Wrasiati.
Ni
Made Wartini and Ni
Putu
Eny Sulistyadewi
Synthesis and characterization of nanosilica
from
boiler ash with co-
11-5
precipitation mcthod
Wahyu
K.
Setiawan, Nastiti S. Indr3.sti , and Suprihatin
The Comparison Of Media on the Microalgae
Nanllochloropsis
sp . Culture
11 - 10
Anak Agung Made Dewi Anggreni.
I
Wayan Amata
and I B
Wayan
Gunam
Identification
of
Media and Indicator Liquid as A Recorder Sman Label
11·14
Endang Warsiki and Riris Octaviasari
The EfTects of Palm Oil MES Surfactant and Inorganic Salt Concentration
1I- 19on Interfacial Tension Values
RisHl Fitria, Ani $uryani. Mira Rivai and Ari Imam
Effect ofNano Zinc Oxide On Characteristic Bionanocornpositc
Tt-25
Siti Agustina, Nastiti Siswi Indrasti. Suprihmin and Numl Taufiqu
Rohman
The Effects of Molar Ratio Between
80%
Glycerol And Palm Oil Acid on
11-3 I
the Synthesis Process of Ester Glycerol
Mira Rivai. Erliza Hambali, Giovanni Nurpratiwi Putri . Ani Suryani.
Pudji Permadi, Bonar T.H Marbun and Ari Imam Sutamo
Selecting Part of Natural Fiber EFB which has Best Mcchanical Strength 11-37
through Tensile Test Analysis for Composite Reinforced Matcrial
Farkhan, Yohancs Aris Purwamo. Erliza Hambal i and Wawan
Hcnnawan
Idcntification of phenol rcd as Staphylococcus aureus indicator label
JI ·44
MC'lati Pratama. Endang Warsiki and Liesbetini Hartoto
Enhancing Ethanol Tolerant of
Escherichia coli
Recombinant
by
Glutamate
11 -48
Addition under Aerobic Conditions
lndra Kurniawan Saputra, Prayoga Suryadanna and Ari Pennana
PUlra
In
Vitro Potentifal
of Antibacterial
Marine Microalgae
EXlract
II -53
Chaetocero:!!J{racilis
Toward
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Bacteria
Ardhi
Novrialdi
Ginting. Licsbctini
Haditjaroko and
Iriani
Setyaningsih
The
Potential Applications of
Modified
Nagara Bcan Flour through II-59
Susi. Lya Agustina and Chondra Wibowo
Studies on thc Chamctcristics
of
Pasayu (Pasca
of
Waslc-Cassava)
11-64
Fortification as a New Product Development
Marleen Sunyoto. Roni Kastaman. Tati Nurmala and Dedi Muh tadi
Optical And Particle
Size
Properties Of
Sargassllm
Sp Chlorophyll As
Dye-
TI-72
Sensitized Solar Cell (DSSC)
Makkulawu Andi Ridwan and Erliza Noor
Alkaline Pre-Treatment of
Gelidium
tari/oliulII
and
Caulerpa racemosa
for tI-76
Bioethanol Production
Dwi Setyaningsih.
Neli
Muna, Elisabeth Van Vivi Aryanti and
Anastasya Hidayat
New Trcnd$ in Industrial Environmental Engineering
&
M:magement
Usc of Biofiltcr to Improve Quality of Polluted River Water fo r Drinking
1JI- 1
Water Supply
Suprihatin , Muhammad Romli and Mohamad Yani
An Empirieallnvesrigation of the Barriers to Grecn Practices in Yogyakart3
IIl -8
Leather Tanning SMEs
Dwi Ningsih. Ono Supamo, Suprihatin and Noel Lindsay
Preliminary Study For CO
2Monitoring System
III- IS
Farhan Syakir, Rindra Wish, [rvi Firqotul Aini, Wisnu latmiko and
Ari Wibisono
Designing a Collaboration Form to Overcome Innovation Resistance in
TJI-22
Waste Managemcnt Practices in Lampung Tapioca Industry
NUT Aini Adinda. Suprihatin. Nasli!i Siswi Indrasti
Pollution Reducing Opportunities for
a
Natural Rubber Processing Industry: III-29
A Case Study
Sya rifa Arum Kusumastuti. Suprihatin and Nastiti Siswi Indrasti
Effects of Palm-Dca Non-Ionic Surfactant as an Additive in Buprofezin
111-35
Insecticide on the Efficacy of it in Controlling Brown Planthoppcr Rice Pest
Fifin
Ni.syu.
Rahmini. Mira Rivai. Nobel Cristian Siregar, Ari Tmam
Sutanto and Ainun Nurkania
Intelligent Information
&
Communication Technology
for
Adaptive
Agroindustry of the Future
Design of Web-Based Information System With Green House Gas Analysis IV- I
fo r Pa lm Oil Biodiesel Agroindustry
Yandra Arkeman. Hafizd Adityo Utomo and Dhani S. Wibawa
Sequential Pattems for Hotspots Occurence Based Weather Data using
IV-8
Clospan algorithm
Tria Agustina and Imas S. Sitanggang
How to Dcal with Diversity in Cultivation Practices using Scenario IV - 13
Generation Techniques: Lessons from Ihe Asian rice
LeI
Initiative
Kiyotada Hayashi. Yandra Arkeman. Elmcr Bautisla, Marlia Mohd
Hanafiah. long Sik Lee. Masanori Saito. Dhalll Satria, Kaiehi
Shobatakc. Suprihatin, Tien Tran Minh and Van Vu
Vila D Ldyana. Erwinsyah and Kiyotada Hayashi
Scquenrial Pattern Mining on Hotspot Data using PrcfixSpan Algorithm
IV-20
Nida Zakiya Nurulhaq and Imas S. Sitanggang
An Intelligent Optimization Model Analysis and Design of Bio-filtration in
N-24
Raw Water Quality Improvement
Ramiza lauda and Taufik Djatna
Development Of People Food Consumtion Patterns Infonnatiol1 System IV-30
Based On Wcbmobile Application.
fadly Maulana Shiddicq, Rani Kastaman and Irfim Ardiansah
Association Rules Mining on Forest Fires Data using FP-Growth and IV-37
ECLAT Algorithm
Nuke Ariney and Imas
S.
Sitanggang
Development Of Expert System For Selecting Tomato
(S(){anllmIV-41
セケ」ッー・イウゥ」ッョ@
L.)
Varieties
Erlin Callya
Rizki
Amanda. Kudang Bora Seminar. Muhamad Syukur
and Noguchi Ryozo
Developing Life Cycle Inventories for Rice Production Systems in IV-47
Philippines: How to Establish Site-specific Data within
theGeneral
Framework
Elmer Bautista, Kiyotada Hayashi and Masanori Saito
Con!>truction of Site-specific Life Cycle lnventories for Rice Production IV-50
Systems in Vietnam
Tran Minh Tien , Bui Hai An, Vu ThiKhanh Van and Kiyotada
Hayashi
Study on Life Cycle Benefit Assessment as a tool for promoting thc solution iV-53
of Environmental Problems
Tetsuo Nishi
Real Time Monitoring Glycerol Esterification Process with Mid IR Sensors IV-57
using Support Vector Mach ine Classification
Iwan Aang Soenandi. Taufik Djatna, Irzaman Husein and Ani Suryani
Extrdction of Multi-Dimensional Research Knowledge Model from IV-63
Scicmific Articles for Technology Monitoring
Arif R. Hakim and Taufik Djatna
Perfonnance of Artificial Lighting Using Genetics Algorithms
IV-69
Limbran SampebalU
The Application of Fuzzy-Neuro Approach for ERP System Selection: Case IV-74
Study on an Agro-industrial Enterprise
ICAIA 2015 ISBN: 978·1-4673· 7405·7
The Effects of Molar Ratio of Glycerol 80% and Palm
Oleic Acid on the Synthesis Process of Ester Glycerol
Mir.J. Rivai. Erliza Hambali. Giovalmi Nurpratiwi Putri. Ani Suryani. Pudji Pcmladi,
Bonar Tua HaJumoan Marbun. Ari Imam Sutanto
SUifactaw ami Bio<'lIergy Research Cellfer. Bogol' Agricllflural Unil'ersi!y
Fac:u /ry of Agricultural Technology. Bogor AgricullUral UI/h'ersil),
Program Study of Petroleum Engineering. Bandw lg InSlilllle o/Techl/ ology
£·mail:m .. _rar;[email protected]@gmail.com. gio\·[email protected].
anisUlJ'ani.sbrc@gmail. com, pudji@,lm.itb.ac.id. [email protected], ari_imam@)·olzoo.com
AbslraCl--Glycc rol este r was 5"ynlbesizL-d b y
I.'slerificalion of glycerol and pulm oleic ucid usiuJ!
methyl ester sulfonic acid (MESA) as catalyst. The purpose of Ihis study was to obtain the bl'St mola r
ratio in the esterification of 80% glycerol with
palm oleic acid using 0.5% MESA catalyst.
Gl ycerol 80-/. was esterified by using a nitrogen
stream at J80°C and a stirring speed of 400 rpm for 90 minutes. rセウオャエウ@ sho wed thlllt エィセ@ best molar ntio wus 0.8 : I (glycerol: olek acid) which produced glycerol heer with the yield of 75.33%,
density of 0938 g1cm). acid ョオュャョセイ@ or 39 ml KOH/g sample, viscosity va lue of 92 eP (30·C), kinema tic viscosit), of 53 cSt (40°C), flash point a t 204°C. pou r point a t O°C. and boiling point al 105°C.
I. I"<TRODU(IION
G
LYC EROL cstcr can be synthesized through anesterification process by reacting glycerol with carboxylic aeid and catalyst. This ーイッ」・セ@ produces water as a by-product. Esterification is a revcn;ible process !'oo Ih:l.t one of the reactants needs 10 be priorly fed in order to push the reaction 10 the right side or to
product formation. A catalyst is used to avoid the need of high tempera ture, longer reaction time. and Ihe formation of dark--colored product [18].
Manu,..ripl r«civcd April 29. 201 S. This work w:u supported
m セ@ of fac,hucs from Surf:u:lam ;ml.l Buxncrgy Rescan:h
Ccnll.T·8oti:or Aj;I1eultund Un, ... -n;II), (SBR C IPS) and fil\llIKC
front I . .cmbag:l A^セョァ、ッャNN@ Dana Pcn.hd,kan {LPO?) wc«"
h」ォセャ」、ァ・、 N@ tィセ@ Eft"e(:1S of Molar Ratio or" Glycerol 80"10 and
Palm oャセL・@ ,\eld on the Synthesis Pruo;ess ofE-<l1.T Glyea-ol
Mira Ri\"ai is with Suri:.eunl &nd BiocnC1"ji;y ReseJJ\'h Cenla".
Bogar Agrieuhurnl UnivCl".<;oly ᆱHNBo\tセセョ、Lョァ@ author 10 provide
cm;ul: ml: イ。イゥLNB セョIG^ャ ィッッN」LLLBI@
ErI,za Hamb:.h is ""th Tlcpartment of aァZイ ッBL、オNセュ。ャ@
T«hnology. Faculty of .... gncultur.<l TechnolOi,Y, SogO!
aャZセZョ・オャエオイ。ャ@ Un,versity Md Surfactant Ind B,o .. :ncrg) R<!SI..'3rch
Cellia-. Bo!:(lI" Agnculrurnl Uni"cysn) (email: crlil!:l.Mi.gmiIJl.com)
liandayani et til. [5] slated (hat reactant-catalyst ratio was one of the factoN: afTec.ting reaction effectiveness. In the esterification of glycerol with oleic acid. thc molar ratio of glycerol to oleic acid reactam is an important factor to observe. In this study, the esteritication was done with glycerol 80%: oleic acid reactant ratios of 0.8:1: 1.7:1: and 2.6:1.
Methyl estcr sulfonic acid 0.5% was used as a catalyst.
II. PROCEDURE
A. Purification ofGlyceml as a By-product of Biodi/!sei Production
Glycerol purification was dont by using a purification reactor of 25 L scale. The purificalion device is shown in Figure 1.
G,o\'anm Nulpl1lu"," Putri
,<
w,th D':partmcnt of aァイッュ、オセャョ。ャ@Tc-chnology. Fncuh)' of Agricullurnl t」」ィョッャセGyN@ Bo!:OI"
As:riculwral Uni,'eI"S'ty (email: .\:,o,·anni"urpl1l1iwi@ iiュセゥ@ I.com j.
Am Suryani ,s with Ikpanmenl of AlVumdustriaJ T""hnolOi!Y.
Faculty of Agricullur.iI T«hnolug)'. Bogar Agncultund Un,vcrs,ty
and sオイヲ。」 ャ 。ョセ@ and BiocUCfgy r」セ。ョZィ@ Center. BOj;Qf Agncultural
Umn ... ny (em:,,!: 3n15ur)",ni.$brtC" iffi3it.com).
Pud;: t'a-n\ad, IS BGZセ@ I'"rogram Stu:.!y of PC1rol:um Enginern"o.
Dandullg InSI;!ull: of T«hnolul:}' and Surfactant and bゥBGBセGセBヲャZy@
R=rch Center. bッセッイ@ Agncultural Un,vcn;lty (email:
pud) i セl BBZャN[ャ「 N。 」NL、 IN@
Bon;::- Tu;\ Halumo.:m Maroun i, wilh pイッセイセュ@ Study Qf
P(u<.>leum F..nlj,U1""T"'g. JUndung In.<litule of Technology (c:maiL
bonlU .m.mun("yuhoo.com).
Atl lm;un SUlllIllO ェセ@ with Surfaclanl and bゥッ」ャQ・イセGy@ Research
Center. Bogar Agricuhurnl Um vtnily (enlail:
:m_'m:un{" yahoo.com)
ICAIA 2015
•
- -
-'"
Compo<ln11 of punfic3tion ""'tor
I. l'unlic(ltion tank 6. イイNャャョセキッイォ@ ofpancl
2. Cap unk 7. wィセ」i@
3. eャセG|cエイゥ」@ mOlor K Unit holdcr
.l . Entr)' funf'ci
S. Control pane:!
9. Cook.:r unit 10. Output
Figure I . Design of purification rcactor of 25 L scale Glycerol purifielltion pro(';cl>l> was dono.: under a condition process used by [151 with some moditications. Firs!. crude glycerol. a by-product of biodiescl industry. '.vas placed in a purification lank and heated until the temperature reached 50°C. Then. 85% technical grade phosphoric acid was added in by
5"to (vlv). the temperature was raised to 80°C. The
mixture was heated and stirred for 4 hours before it
W:lS left for 30 minutes until thrce layers were fomlcd. from lOp to bottom. the three layers consisted of free fany acid. glycerol (product of purification). and !rolt. Glycerol and sail were taken out from the purification lank before they were scpar.lted by using a filti.ltion device.
B. esterification of Purijie(1 Glycerol
In thIS synthesis of glycerol done through esterification. glycerol resulted from the purification was reacted with oleic acid in molar ratios (glycerol:oleic acid) orO.8:1, 1.7:1. and 2.6:1 ||セエィ@ an addition of MESA catalyst (w/w) by 0.3°/0. The esterification was conducted in lriple neck nash put on hol plates at 180°C for 90 minutes. During the esterification process. nitrogen was flown into the flasks at the rate of 100 mUminules to avoid the exislI:ncc of oxygen and push Ihe formed WOller vapor OUlto Ibe condenser.
C. Allalyses of gセカ」」イッャN@ MESA Catalyst. and
G(vcerof El·ter
Analysis of glycerol. MESA catalyst. and glycerol
ISBN : 978- 1-4673-7405-7
estcr were done to mcasure glyecrol content. density (OMA 4500M AnIon Paar). viscosity (Brookfield DV-111 ultra), pH. acid number. kinematic viscosity (ASTM D 445). boiling point (ASTM 0 86). flash point (ASTM 0 92). and pour point (ASTM 097).
D. Drl/(J Analysis
A factorial complclc!y nmdomiz..:d design with two replicates was used. Thc faclOT was MESA catalyst
」ッョ・セョエイ。エゥッョ@ (A). The experimental dcsign model
was:
( I)
where:
Y,!I Observation valuc as alTcctcd by factor A at
i-level jJ '" Mcan value
A, '" Effect ofmol:l.r ratio atj-Icvc1
0 ..
0.8:1; 1.7:1;2.0J)
1:" Error of experimental unit al i-level of facior A
and J-Ievc1 of replicate U- l.2)
Data were subjected to analysis of variance by using SPSS 16.0 progr.lm and a Duncan test at a s
5%. The te.<:t was done to measure inter-level diO'erences in a factor.
Ill. RESULTANDDlSCUSS10N
A. Physiccx:hemical Properties
oj
Purified GlycerolCrude glycerol was purified by the addition of 85% phosphoric acid by 5% (v/v). The acid reacted with the remains of potassium hydrochloridc catalyst to fonn a potassium phosphate salt and (II Ihe samc timc
scparate free ftlfty acids. The remaining methanol, which did nOi rcact. evaporated when glycerol waS healed at 65°C. The result was 80% purt: glycerol having different physicochemical properties from those of crude glyccrol. Thesc differences are shown
III T "hie I. l'urifiCUlion ーイッ」・ウセ@ mercased glycerol
\\!vel. lowered viscosity and demit), levels. and brightened the color.
TABLEt
PHVSICOCHl:.MICAL PROPERTIES OF CRUDE AKO PURIFtEO GL VCEROL
pmャuャャiNQNセt@ Unit Crude glyc<:rOl l'urifil'li g!yco::rol ウャケイセAᄋ@
""re
!.l:vel or
''-glycerol 45 .t 2.05 lI4 io 2.00 I ッッッL セ@
vゥセッウャャケ@ at ,p
30' C 625"'1.07
189:0:0.70
1 ""
Dcnsiry al
J&.cmJ 1.0745 io I 2S76 :t 1.261
2S ' C 0.0001 00001
C.""
Blackish Hro" .. msh No color「セョ@ y.:Ilow
RoIhng
·C
1\0 io 3.25 1I2 :t. 2.05 29'I!£im
• [7). [D]
[image:7.594.77.273.85.361.2]lCAIA 2015
B. Physicochemical Properlies of ME5"A cuiuセiGウエ@
MESA (melhyi es/er sulfonic acid) is an intcnnediate compound resulted from the sulphonation reaction of
methyl
eSler. Itis
dark colored and acidic. Thc propcrtics of MESA in this scudy arc sho",;nin
Table 2. Bascd on its pH v:Jlue, MESA is セエイッョァャケ@
acidic. This spt:cific property of MESA has bee n the basis of its use as cat::llysl in esterification. As in other acidic catalysts. the acidity of MESA is suspected to rcsull in the protonation of oleic Dcid which is the initiation of estt."r fommtion process.
lABLE 2
?HYSTC'OCHEM1('AL PRorr;RTIFS OJ' MESA CATALYST
Parameter
pH ('''/ 0 in dislilled ""ncr)
IXnsil)';ll 2S·C C"""
Unll Value
RNセ@ f. 0.20
!:'c ml 0.917310.0001
Black
C. Ph)Wi"ocilemico/ pイッー・イエ ゥエセ@ nfGlycerni £t/er
Esterification is the fonnation of ester by rcacting fatty acid with alcohol. Glycerol ester is an ester whose alcohol molecule is glycerol. As the esterification result, i'.\'0 layers arc formed. The top
layer is glycerol ester and the bottom layer is the remaining glycerol which does not react. In this study, thc rcsulted glycerol ester was a mlxturc of monooleic. diolelc, and triolelc glycerols and thc remaining fatty acids whi..:h did not rca..:t.
According to (16]. in order to get optimum product, the reaction balance of estcrification should be ptl.ilhed to (he right position or produe( formation by supplying energy 10 thc fc-actlon. ovcrfcedlng the reaCianlS, and continuous removal of product during the process Esterification process is a reversible reaction so that it is necessary to maintain the direction of the process to the pru<luction side. In this study, this was done by overfceding glycerol reactant to the reaction. The formation of two layers in the esterification product was cau:.ed by the finding thnt in the end of the reaction there was some glycerol which did not get reacted. During the esteritication proces!', nitrogen gas was continuously flown into the flask to push the water vapor out of the flask. As wate r vapor was a by· product of estcrific':!lion, the removal of it would le.ld to an optimal glyecrol estcr production. If it was not removed out from the reactor, the fomlcd .... ';ltef vapor might hydrolyze glycerol ester back to glycerol and oleic aeld. The yield and the physicochemical properties including add number. density. viscosity, kinematic viscosity. flash point, pour point. and boiling point of glycerol ester produced were measured .
I) Y,eld
In this study. yield was the amount of glycerol reacted with oleic acid to result in glycerol ester. It is shown in Figure 2 that wider molar ratios resulted in fewer yieldS. This indicaled that overfeeding of
ISBN: 978· 1-4673· 7405·7
glycerol, under the esterification condition used in this study. did not result in higher glycerol ester yield. This might be caused by the fact thai the purity level of glyc!;rol wa.iI only 84% so that when it was overfed to the esterification process. more filth was found in the esterification material. These filths inhibited the tbm\ation process of glycerol
ester.
Estt..-rifiC;J.tion done with higher amount of oleic acid (molar ratio of 0.8: I) resulted in high yidd. Thi:-. indicated that higher amount of oleic aeid fed in the esterification process increased the possibllity of the fonnalion of estcr bonds between glycerol and olcic acid.
'00
m ' OJ
l
セ@,
,
セセ@セ@ セ G ⦅ッ。@
-
セ@•
,
[image:8.594.313.493.247.325.2]0.1:1 1. ' 1 セ NVZQ@
FIgure セ⦅@ Etkt:15 of mol:ll" ratio on glycerol 」ウセ」イ@ }ldd
It was also sho\\.'I1 that molar r.ltio factor did not gi\'c sib'Tlifieam cOect (p>O.OS) on Yield. It was suggcsted therefore that a molar ratio of 0.8: I be used
\0 gct high yield of glycerol ester. 2) pH
The glyccrol ester sample taken from the c!\tcrification W'dS a mixture of Illonooleic. diokie, lrioleic ァャケ」セイッャウL@ remaining oleic acid which did not react, and MESA catalyst. pH measurement was done by dissolving glyecrol ester in 30% distilled water. It
W:J!» found that セiケ」」イッャ@ estcr samplc did not dissol ve in the water but MESA catalyst did. pH measurcmtnt was taken to assess the .lmount of MESA catalyst found in thc セGsエセGイゥャゥ」。エゥッョ@ product. Highe r pH level indicated hig.lter anlount of MESA catalyst found in glycerol ;;sler. ResulLiI of pH measurement arc depicted in Figure 3.
SO
6.0
セ Mエo@
2..0
00
5.46 5.-5 6.11
0.8:1 1.- :\ セ NVZQ@
:"lolar ratio (glycerol : oleic acid)
fゥセオイセ@ 3. eヲヲセャ^@ ormobr ratio on piT
It is shown in Figure 3 that a widcr molar ratio or higher amount of glycerol fed illto esterification led to lower pH levels. This was eaused by the find ing that the pH levcl of glycerol ester fonned WIIS in line with
[image:8.594.314.495.577.677.2]ICAfA 2015
thc pH le"eI of glycerol. In this study. purified glyccrol had a pH Icvel of6.24.
3) Dellsit)'
Density or specific gravity is a weight of a liquid per unit volume. Density measurement was taken [0 assess
Ihc: imeT-llIolc!eu\c denscness in glyccrol eSier yielded.
It is shown in Figure 4 that glycerol ester with high density was yielded in wider molar ratios. According 10 [9]. the density It!vel of eSler of carboxylic fatty flcid was tlfl"i:ctcd by molccular weight and
temperature.. Highcr molecular weight mcant higher density level.
"
セ@ I':: 0.938
0
.2i
0.9oNq Tセ@ 0.943
i'Q.6
セ@ 0.3
0.0
O.S.1 1. - ' 1 '::.6:1
[image:9.611.88.276.241.343.2]MOlar nllio HァiyGセQBoi@ : ッャセゥ」@ acid)
Figure 4. eヲヲ・」Aセ@ of molar ratio on drnsity level of g,lycerol n;u:r
It was found that molar ratio factor did not give significant effect on dcnsity [c'·cls. This might be
caused by the faci that each sample of esterification product contained similar main components. nam::!!y monooleic. dioleic. and trioleic glycerols. Therefore. the dcnsity level or each sample was nOI too different.
II was foulld th31 molar mlio r.,ctor did not glVI.' significant cfTect on dl.'nsity levels. This might be caused by the fact that each sample of e.m:rification product contained similar 111.1in components. nnmely monoolcic. diokie, and lrio!eic g!ycwols. Therefore. Ihe 、」ョセゥエケ@ level of each sample was nOI to() diffcrent.
4) Acid Numher
Acid number IS used to J.SSI.'SS Ihe amount of fatty acids per gram of sample. Highcr acidic number indicates higher amount of fatty acid coment. Acid numbcr shows how much (ml) KOH is nccded 10 neutralize ! gram of [aUoil. It is shown in Figure
5
that. in gcneral. an increase in molar ralio Il.'d to 3n increase in acid number. This meant that wider molar rJ.lio 'vas not followed by higher yield conversion to glycerol ester lea"ing fTl<)re fatty acid which did not react in the esterification process. As oleic aeid has an acid number of 200 mg KOHlg sample, high amount of oleic acid remains which did not react in Ihe process would lead to the production of glycerol ester \\ith high acid number.[SBN : 978-!-4673-7405-7
,
0.8:1 1.6:1
\101 ... rlUO I.b.-ervl
,ok"
":1(1)Fig ... ", S. EffO;<:I$; ofmolu I":IUO on acid numba' Qf Slycerol C:Slcr
It was found In3t molar rmio f3ctor ga\ e significant etTl.'cts on acid number of glycerol eSler.
5) ViSCOSity
Viscosity is
a
physicm:hemical propcny showing the level of thickness of a fluid. An increase in viscosity is a result of increased molecule concentration [1OJ.
Increased .... iscoslty of a material may also caused by increased chain length :l.nd molecular weight. Viscosity alTecls thc flowing characteristic of:l. fluid: higher viscosity me3ns lower capacity of the fluid to flow, As can be secn in Figure 6, higher amount of glycerol fed into the process led 10 widcr molar rJlio and higlll.'r viscosilY level. Thiswas attributed to thc faci that the vis.cosity of glycerol estcr yielded was always in line with Ihe viscosity of g[ycerol used. In addition, 35 discussed above, wider molar mIlO did nOI yield in higllcr amount of glyccro[ cster [caving morc oleic add which did not involve in the reaction. This. in tum, led to a higher viscosity levcl of glyccrol ester.
iセ o@
c
"
0-'"
"
..
,
.,
"
,
;:; ;0
0
0.8:1
lI!oLar I":I!IO <g l)urol . ッャ・ゥセ@ Icid)
fゥャA|ャ イ セ@ 6. fイイセG|AQs@ 01 molar milO on viセosャエケ@ teveh Qrgl)'\'c:rol .:ster.
II was revea!ed that, in general. glycero[ ester yielded from the molar rJlio of 0.8: 1 the lowest viscosity level. This indicated that must glycerol ester was produced in [he esterification proces.s done with a mol:l.r ratio of 0.8: I. This was supported by thc finding that molar ratio factor gave significant efTect on thc viSCOSity levels of glycerol ester.
6) }.,'ilJemut/c Viscm'ity
Kinematic viscosity is the measure of the resistance of glycerol ester to flow. Higher kinematic viscosity level means that it is more difficult for the subst3ncc to flow. According to [llj. tht.: value of kinematic viscosity is afTectcd by the length of carbon chain and thc position and number of doubl.: bonds of falty acid or alcohol used in an ester synthesis. Longer carbon chain means higher kinemalk viscosity level while
[image:9.611.309.491.454.537.2]leAIA 2015
numbcr of double bonds has a negative relation with kinematic viscm:ity level. Kinematic viscosity is a func tion of dynamic viscosity and de ns ity: inc reased kinematic viscosilY is resulted from hight.-r dynamic viscosity and lower density le vel (8]. In this scudy, it WllS rcvcllled Ih:1I wider molar mtios gave higher kinematic viscosity level which was in line '>I.11h viscosity level (Figure 7).
r:
I "
1
0•
i y ... ... i.P)_. _ O<4lfゥセイエB@ 7. Efli.,<;tS of molar r.1I10 un kinematic viKOSiry of
ァャ I セエZイオャ@ Cl>lcr
Molar ratio was found 10 give no :.ignificant ・ヲヲ・clセ@
on kinematic viscosity levels (If yielded glycerol ester. As disc ussed abo\'C, esterification of glycerol and oleic acid rcsullcd
in
glycerol ester in the fonn<> uf monoolein, dioldn , or trIOlein. One of th em was found to be dominant and :lfiect their general physicochemic:ll properties. This non-significant difference suggesled that all samplcs share eoounOD main components in relatively similar concentration.i) Flash Poi,,1
Flash point is the lowest temperaturc at which a <:.ubstanee starts 10 ignite and bum itself II] . It is a parameter ::Iffected by the eOnlent of volatile tractions (alcohol residue). Accordi ng to [1 2]. higher content of \'olalilc ヲイNャ・ャゥッョNセ@ in an ester nukes it need onlv low temperature to ignite. A material wilh low flash'point is easier to get burnt and therefore needs special handling and storing. In esterification. as an alcohol, glycerol releases its hydroxyl groups and binds oleic acid to fonn ester, This makes the flash point of glycerol ester higher. Purified glycerol and oleic acid have flash points of 120"C and 204"C. n;"spcclivcly. Rc1D.ti vc1y similar component compositions found In
samples make their flash points relatively the same.
8) Pour PO;nI
According to [4]. pour point is the lowes\ temperature at which a sample is still able 10 flow. Lower pour [X)int of a material indicates that the material is able to flow at low tempenllures. According to [14]. the chain length ::Ind unsalUr,lIion of a molecule affcci its pour point. Longer ehOlin length increases pour point while double bonds indicating unsaturntion lowers it. In this study, the pour poims of all glycerol ester セューャ・ウ@ were found to be tht: same, namely
O"c.
T his showed thai at tempemnlrcs below a ce. there would be white crystals f<)nlled in the glycerol ester fi nd it would no longer beISBN: 978- 1-4673-7405-7
able to flow, A fluid with low pour point is beller 10 be used m areas with low temperature.
9) Boiling Poin!
Boilillg point is a physicochemical properly showing a temperature at which a material starts to boil . Boiling point shows intermolecular force in a fluid: strongcr force means highcr boiling point. According to [6J, boiling poim is affected by molecular weight and th.: eXistence of hydrogen bonds. In this study. as shown in Figure
8.
boiling pointS of glycerol ester weTe slightly fluctuating . The highest boil ing point was shown by glycerol ester yidded from Ihe molar ratio of L7:1.Lセ@
':: I!O
•
セ@ <•
セ@セ@
セ@•
'"
"
,
,
.
,
|QカiN\イBBBGA セ エZ\L@ .... セ@ ...".· .... 11
ID '
: .0 I
Figure 8. Elfecl.'l o( mow r.ltio on boiling poont of gl}<;crol ester
It wus shown that molar ratiu gave significant effects (a .. 5%) on the boiling points of glycerol ester yielded. The boiJing points in molar ratios of 0.8: I and 2.6:1 were not different but they were significantly different from the boiling point of glycerol ester in molar ratio of 1.7: I. This was an indication that glycerol ester yielded in the molar r.l1io of 1. 7: I had the highest conccntration.
After the properties of glycerol ester were analyzed. the best esterification condition W::IS dctcnnined based (In the parameters of the analysis done, First, based on Ihc yield, the highcst yield of glycerol ester was obtained from molar ratio of 0.8:1. Density level was not included in the consideration as no s i!,'flificant cfTcct of molar ratio was found o n it. In addi tion. the difference in the density levels of glycerol estcr yielded in different molar ratios was negligible. The lowest acid number ||セ。ウ@ tound in glycerol ester yielded in molar r.Jtio (If 0.8: I. Further. glycerol ester in this molar ratio also had the small est viSCOSity and kinematic levels, Low カャセ」ッウゥエケ@ and kinematic viscosity levels indicated most pre ferred glycerol ester as it would be the easiest one to flow. The next parameter W'J.s flash point and the preferred glycerol ester W::IS the one \\;Ih highest flID;h point. A substance with high nash point is nOI easy to get burned making it easier \0 handle. As no significant difference was found ヲャ。Nセィ@ points. glycerol es ter yielded in molar ratio of 0.8:! was then selected as the best. Similar consideration was given to pollr points which werc not signilicamly different making glycerol ester yielded in molar ratio of 0.8: I as the best. Finally. b(lsed on the boiling point. the beSl glycerol ester was thc one yielded in mo lar ratio of 1.7: I as it had the highest boi ling point. O"erall. it was decidcd thaI the best
[image:10.604.309.498.257.327.2]ICA IA 2015
csterific;Jtion condition was thc one done in molar ratio of 0.8: I.
IV. CONCLUSIO:-"
The best esterification process was obtained in molar ra tio of 0.8:1. Glycerol ester produced in this condition had a yield of 75.33%, density le\'eI of 0.938 glcm3. acid number of 39 ml KOH/g sample.
viscosity of 92 cP (30°C). kincmatk viscosity of 53 cS! (40°C). flash point of 204°C. pour point of O°C. ;Jlld boiling point of t05 e
e.
Recotnt!lIdarion
It was suggcstcd that esterification of glycerol 80% \\ith palm oleic acid be done in molar ratios wider than 0.8: I.
ACKNOWLEOGME"''T
Supports of facilities from Surfactant and Biocnergy Research Center (SBRC IPB) and finance from Lemhugo Pengdola Dalla Pelldidikoll (LPDP)
were acknowledged.
REFERI!NCES
II! Am....-ican So<.:io:t) for TC"ling and \1&I<;ri;ils. ''SlOIntlard Tot \1elhods for Flash Poim by pcャ「j」ケᄋmャャョセウ@ Closed Cup TeSler". ASTM. \Vasllingtoll DC. 2005.
[2J Ammcan Soci"'), for Teslmg and :>'iHteMals. "SIW1dard To::.!
mセエィッ、ウ@ for DlsuliatiOll of Pccmk",m l>rooucts". ASTM.
Washington DC, 2009.
[3} aュセNNMゥ」。NGャ@ sッ」GセGiNケ@ for TCSl1ng:tnd Z|ゥセエャ[G|GQ。ャj[N@ "Si.)J1d:lrd tセャ@
\iethods for k[イNZュセオエ@ ViiCOIuy IIf Tr:lnsp.:u;;n: セョ、@ セャi・@
l.'qu,ds". ASD.1 . W;r.shlllgion DC. 2009
14] Amc:riclin Society fill' Testin!: and Materials. Sland.,rd Test Method., for Pour J'Qml of Pctrolrum Product .... A.STM.
Wash,ngIO<l DC. 2009.
[5j A. ャi。ャャNj[ャスGZャGセゥN@ S. Marsudi. M 1"a.<ikin. and セQN@ sオ、ャ「セセ、イゥIGoN@
I:.slc:nfic.:lhon ReacllDn of OleiC Acid ,tnd GI)'C<.WI uセュNZ@
Adl! Ca\;ll)st. Indon<;sinn Journal of Mal<.T1:11s Sc .. :nC'C:. Ed
Q.;100cr 2006. pp. 102· 105. ISSN. pp. 1411·109S
[61 C R. Kmn")'. A DILNエセュ@ セi。オョァ@ Iftokcular セエョNエ」エオイ・@ of
orpn,c 」ッューッャャョ、セ@ ... セエィ@ thC1r bo,hna pII,nts. cィ・jュ・セQ@
LaboJrolOl)' Ulah UDl\·c:n;,ty. Salt L.ke Cny. "'051. 1938. [71 J. B Segur. iWd H.E. Obcrstar. Vi..:osity of ;;1)'tCTOI and it,
aqueous セャャiャャッョウN@ f.ll,tt. Chem .. 43(9). 1951, pp. 217i·2120
[81 J.
c.
C . Hernandez ond D. E. P. c。ャ。QセョL@ PmJictmg the kmematic \'i1'<:osny of FAMes セョ、@ blodl,<cl: セGttiーゥイゥ」。I@modd:!.. fu(l, Journal 01 Fut! and En.::rgy. No. 7144. 0'.1. 2014
[9] 1. C Phillip .• and G. J. Manamal. fNAtセ」エ@ of number of
carboxyl grQp\lS on IlqU".! 、セウャエケ@ (If e-;!eN or al1o:)1carboxyhc
IC'ds.
En,
Chern .. 23( I). ;97&. JlP. ] ·6.[IOj K !lokmhcrw:.8 Jom",;"", B K,m1bcTlI , and B lmdman •.
sオイヲセ」エョョオZ@ ii!1d Polymers. in aアオセGos@ Soluuon. Jhon Wiley &
Sons. lid .. lond()ft. 2002.
[11 J K. gャGtィセイ、@ and K. R. Steidle)'. kエョセGQtiセャャ・@ VbCOS'\Y of fall)'
acid methyl ・セャ・ヲAGZ@ !'redicIIOll. 」[エャセQNャQ。Nエ・ゥェ@ "i5COSlty
contribution of esters with una\'llil"bk data. and ca!bon
Ol)'gcn C'lUl'':llcnL", Fuet. tI4. lOll. pp. 321 [セSRセT@
[12} M Mittelbach and c.:. Rcmschmidl. B,odie.'oCl. !SBN· SセRPPᄋ@
002.19· 2.2004.
[I3J \1. P.gh31'\) an,J M. Ros..i. The FUIU"" orGJ)'CCfol New Uld
or
0 VCl1illl1k R.:tw m[オセNB。AN@ The Ro)aJ Socio:ty ッ ヲc 「NZイオェセエエケ N@Cn",bridgc. 2006.
ISBN: 978- 1-4673-7405-7
[!4J N. U. Soriano. V.P. Jr. Migo. M. Matsumllra. 07DnlZN vcgetable oil as JWUr point depressant for ncat hlooiescl, Fuel. liS. 2006. JIll. 25·31.
[15J O. Famb,c. Utih,;tlloo of byprodutl GI}ccrot of B,od'e<cl I' roduccion as aオセNィ。イケ@ Material of cセGitャュH@ elUshe', 11 .. :sis. Hogill' Ag,iculloral tlni\'I:fSII)'. Bogor, lndones.a. 2009 [16J R. J. Fd>cndm and J.5. fセ^」イkャᄁャャL@ "Organ,!: Chemica]". Vol
2 (3). ヲイャセョァァセN@ jSォNュセ@ 1982.
[17] IndoneSia National Slandard. Crude Glyc.·rol. ZMNQSQャPョセQ@
Standardmul()lI Aseney 01 Indoncsta, };U.::ut:I. 1995. [181 Y. H Hui. Railey Aョ、オセエイゥNャ@ Oil and hi Products. Vol!. J
Wi1<:)'. i'lL"'" York. 1995.