‘Saya/Kami akui bahawa telah membaca Karya ini dan pada pandangan saya/kami* karya ini
adalah memadai dari skop dan kualiti untuk tujuan penganugerahan Ijazah Sarjana Muda Kejuruteraan Mekanikal (Struktur dan Bahan)
Tandatangan : ……….
Nama Penyelia I : ……….
Tarikh : ……….
Tandatangan : ……….
Nama Penyelia II : ……….
MAPPING CORROSION ACTIVITIES OF VARIOUS CONCENTRATION OF ACIDIC SOLUTION IN A PIPE USING ULTRASONIC TESTING
FARAHILDA BINTI MASEKAM
Laporan ini dikemukakan sebagai
memenuhi sebahagian daripada syarat penganugerahan Ijazah Sarjana Muda Kejuruteraan Mekanikal (Struktur dan Bahan)
Fakulti Kejuruteraan Mekanikal Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
“I hereby declare that I have read this thesis and in my opinion this thesis is sufficient in
terms of scope and quality for the award of the degree of Bachelor Mechanical
Engineering (Structure & Material)”
Signature : ………..
Name of Supervisor : ………..
ABSTRACT
Conventional method of inspecting the thickness of pipe due to corrosion is
using Ultrasonic Testing Thickness Measurements (UTTM). This experiment is to study
the corrosion activities in a pipe with using different concentration of acidic.
Hydrochloric acid is used as a medium to create corrosion in internal wall of pipe. The
hydrochloric acid is a strong acid, since it is fully dissociated in water where is a strong
inorganic acid that is used in many industrial processes. The different of concentration
of hydrochloric acid in water, 30%, 50% and 70% are used for this experiment. The
different concentration of acidic used shown distinguishes of corrosion activities on the
internal wall of pipe. The thickness of pipe wall is measured with an Ultrasonic Testing
Thickness Measurement method. The results of corrosion activities are presented in
C-scan presentation resulted from A-C-scan readings obtained from Ultrasonic Testing
Thickness Measurement method. The C-scan result displays are created using the
ABSTRAK
Ujian Pengukuran Ketebalan Ultrasonik (UTTM) merupakan kaedah yang paling
sesuai untuk memeriksa dan menguji ketebalan paip yang disebabkan oleh kakisan.
Eksperimen ini dijalankan bertujuan untuk mempelajari dan mengetahui aktiviti kakisan
pada paip dengan menggunakan kepekatan asid yang berbeza. Asid hidroklorik
digunakan sebagai medium untuk membentuk kakisaan pada permukaan dalam paip.
Asid ini bersifat kuat dan meluas digunakan di pelbagai proses perindustrian. Pada
eksperimen ini sebanyak tiga jenis kepekatan asid yang berbeza digunakan iaitu 30%,
50% dan 70% kepekatan. Perbezaan kepekatan asid yang digunakan menunjukkna
perbezaan aktiviti kakisan pada bahagian dalam dinding paip. Ketebalan dinding paip
akan diukur dengan menggunakan kaedah Ujian Pengukuran Ketebalan Ultrasonik
CONTENTS
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE
PENGAKUAN
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ABSTRACT
ABSTRAK
CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLE
LIST OF FIGURE
LIST OF SYMBOL
LIST OF APPENDIX
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 19
1.1 Project 19
1.2 Problem Statement 19
1.3 Objectives 22
1.4 Scope of Study 22
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 23
2.1 Corrosion in Pipelines 23
2.2 Types of Corrosion 25
2.3 Ultrasonic Testing Thickness 25
2.4 Comparison of Previous Researching 26
CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 30
3.1 Introduction 30
3.2 Specimen 32
3.2.1 Type of Specimen 32
3.2.2 Preparation of Specimen 33
3.2.3 Grid Line 35
3.3 Acidic Solution 36
3.3.1 Type of Acidic 36
3.3.2 Concentration of Acidic 38
3.3.3 Volume of Acidic Used 39
3.4 Ultrasonic Testing and Data Recording 39
3.4.1 A-Scan Data 41
3.4.2 C-Scan Data Presentation 42
3.5 Programming and Data Display 42
CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 44
4.1 MATLAB Programming 44
4.2 Result of 30% Concentration of 46
Hydrochloric Acid
4.3 Result of 50% Concentration of 53
Hydrochloric Acid
4.4 Result of 70% Concentration of 60
Hydrochloric Acid
4.5 Result Comparison Between Three 66
4.6 Advantages of C-scan Display 68
4.7 Factors Influenced the Corrosion Activities 70
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION 71
CHAPTER 6 RECOMMENDATION 73
REFERENCES 74
LIST OF TABLE
NO. TITLE PAGES
1 Properties of Hydrochloric Acid 37
(Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrochloric_acid)
2 Physical Properties of Hydrochloric Acid with Different 38
Concentration
LIST OF FIGURE
NO. TITLE PAGES
1.0 Internal Corrosion on Pipeline 21
(Source: http://www.corrview.com/service_03.htm)
3.1 Project Flow Diagram 31
3.2 Both of End of Pipe Will Welding With Two Lids and Hole 33
to Insert Acidic on Specimen
3.3 Welding Area on Specimen 34
3.4 Dimension of Specimen 34
3.5 Specimen of Experiment 35
3.6 Grid Line on Layout Pipe Surface 35
3.7 Grid Line on a Pipe Surface 36
3.8 Calibration Block K1 (right) and Calibration Block K2 (left) 40
(Source: Sonix, Inc. “The ABC’s of Ultrasonics Power Point
Presentation”)
3.10 Color Range of Pipe Wall Thickness 43
4.0 Example of C-scan Result Display 46
4.1 First Reading Display Result for 30% Concentration of 46
Hydrochloric Acid
4.2 Second Reading Display Result for 30% Concentration of 47
Hydrochloric Acid
4.3 Third Reading Display Result for 30% Concentration of 47
Hydrochloric Acid
4.4 Forth Reading Display Result for 30% Concentration of 48
Hydrochloric Acid
4.5 Fifth Reading Display Result for 30% Concentration of 49
Hydrochloric Acid
4.6 Sixth Reading Display Result for 30% Concentration of 50
Hydrochloric Acid
4.7 Seventh Reading Display Result for 30% Concentration of 50
Hydrochloric Acid
4.8 Eighth Reading Display Result for 30% Concentration of 51
4.9 Ninth Reading Display Result for 30% Concentration of 51
Hydrochloric Acid
4.10 Tenth Reading Display Result for 30% Concentration of 52
Hydrochloric Acid
4.11 First Reading Display Result for 50% Concentration of 53
Hydrochloric Acid
4.12 Second Reading Display Result for 50% Concentration of 54
Hydrochloric Acid
4.13 Third Reading Display Result for 50% Concentration of 54
Hydrochloric Acid
4.14 Forth Reading Display Result for 50% Concentration of 55
Hydrochloric Acid
4.15 Fifth Reading Display Result for 50% Concentration of 56
Hydrochloric Acid
4.16 Sixth Reading Display Result for 50% Concentration of 57
Hydrochloric Acid
4.17 Seventh Reading Display Result for 50% Concentration of 57
Hydrochloric Acid
4.18 Eighth Reading Display Result for 50% Concentration of 58
Hydrochloric Acid
Hydrochloric Acid
4.20 Tenth Reading Display Result for 50% Concentration of 59
Hydrochloric Acid
4.21 First Reading Display Result for 70% Concentration of 60
Hydrochloric Acid
4.22 Second Reading Display Result for 70% Concentration of 61
Hydrochloric Acid
4.23 Third Reading Display Result for 70% Concentration of 61
Hydrochloric Acid
4.24 Forth Reading Display Result for 70% Concentration of 62
Hydrochloric Acid
4.25 Fifth Reading Display Result for 70% Concentration of 63
Hydrochloric Acid
4.26 Sixth Reading Display Result for 70% Concentration of 63
Hydrochloric Acid
4.27 Seventh Reading Display Result for 70% Concentration of 64
Hydrochloric Acid
4.28 Eighth Reading Display Result for 70% Concentration of 65
Hydrochloric Acid
4.29 Ninth Reading Display Result for 70% Concentration of 65
4.30 Tenth Reading Display Result for 70% Concentration of 66
Hydrochloric Acid
LIST OF SYMBOLS
h = height, m
r = Radius, m
LIST OF APPENDIX
NO. TITLE PAGES
A Gantt Chart of PSM I and PSM II 76
B(i) Week 1 Data Reading Initial Thickness of Pipeline Model 78
for 30% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
B(ii) Week 2 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 79
for 30% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
B(iii) Week 3 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 80
for 30% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
B(iv) Week 4 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 81
for 30% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
B(v) Week 5 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 82
for 30% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
B(vi) Week 6 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 83
for 30% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
B(vii) Week 7 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 84
B(viii) Week 8 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 85
for 30% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
B(ix) Week 9 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 86
for 30% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
B(x) Week 10 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 87
for 30% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
C(i) Week 1 Data Reading Initial Thickness of Pipeline Model 88
for 50% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
C(ii) Week 2 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 89
for 50% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
C(iii) Week 3 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 90
for 50% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
C(iv) Week 4 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 91
for 50% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
C(v) Week 5 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 92
for 50% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
C(vi) Week 6 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 93
for 50% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
C(vii) Week 7 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 94
for 50% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
for 50% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
C(ix) Week 9 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 96
for 50% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
C(x) Week 10 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 97
for 50% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
D(i) Week 1 Data Reading Initial Thickness of Pipeline Model 98
for 70% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
D(ii) Week 2 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 99
for 70% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
D(iii) Week 3 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 100
for 70% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
D(iv) Week 4 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 101
for 70% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
D(v) Week 5 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 102
for 70% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
D(vi) Week 6 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 103
for 70% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
D(vii) Week 7 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 104
for 70% Concentration of Hydrochloric Acid
D(viii) Week 8 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 105
D(ix) Week 9 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 106
for 70% Concentration of hydrochloric Acid
D(x) Week 10 Data Reading Thickness of Pipeline Model 107
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project
The purpose of this project is to conduct experiment to study the corrosion
activities in a pipe using various concentration of acidic solution using Ultrasonic
Testing Thickness Measurement (UTTM) method, and to produce a program that
models a C-scan presentation of the corrosion activities in the pipe from A-scan
presentation obtained from UTTM. The study and data collection of this project will be
held at the Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM).
1.2 Problem Statement
Corrosion in pipelines is a problem long faced since long time ago. Industrial
sector fields grow older and move to more challenging and often aggressive
environments, the difficulties presented by corrosion are multiplying. Some pipelines
deteriorate slowly, and certain cases pipeline life has been reliably targeted at 70 years
or more. Other pipelines have been built which have exhausted their life after 1 year
According to Kucera (1988), CO2 and H2S gases, in combination with water,
define most of the corrosion problems in oil and gas production. Other problems include
microbiological activity and the solids accumulation. The mechanisms of CO2 corrosion
are generally well defined. However, the reality inside a pipeline becomes complicated
when CO2 acts in combination with H2S, deposited solids, and other environments. H2S
can be highly corrosive, but can, in some cases, form a protective sulfide scale that
prevents corrosion. Microorganisms can attach to pipe walls and cause corrosion
damage.
On the latest researching by A. Cosham, P. Hopkins, K.A. Macdonald (2007),
corrosion can be classified into one of three general categories. There are internal
corrosion caused by the produced fluids and gases, external corrosion caused by
exposure to groundwater or seawater, and atmospheric corrosion caused by salt spray
and weathering offshore. Of these, internal corrosion is the most costly since internal
mitigation methods cannot be easily maintained and inspected. Pitting corrosion along
the bottom of the pipeline is the primary corrosion mechanism leading to failures in gas
pipelines. The common features of this mechanism are:
a. The presence of water containing any of the following; carbon dioxide (CO2),
bacteria, oxygen (O2), or solids;
b. Pipelines carrying higher levels of free-water production with no means of
water removal, i.e. well site separation or dehydration;
c. The presence of fluid traps where water and solids can accumulate;
d. Vapor phase corrosion is a less common mechanism that has also led to
failures. Although not specifically addressed in this recommended practice,
many of the preventative measures described in this document will also
Figure 1.0: Internal Corrosion on Pipeline
(Source: http://www.corrview.com/service_03.htm)
On April 2006, in Alaska they had a case about the corrosion in pipelines. On 2nd
March 2006 until April 2006 was determined that 201,000 gallons of oil had spread over
almost 2 acres of tundra. The leaky pipeline remains out of service while field workers
check out corrosion problems. The corrosion on pipelines was detected by the pipeline
leak-detection system sound warnings on four straight days in the week leading up to
last month’s record North Slope oil spill. They found that the 34 inches pipeline that
leaked had circumstances that made leak detection become difficult, which including a
relatively high level of sediment moving through the pipe along with the oil. They also
found the fluctuations in the volume of oil sent was down to the line from a processing
plant can mask a potential leaks. Then the corrosion was blamed for causing an
1.3 Objectives
The objectives of this study are:
a. To study the corrosion activities in internal pipe using various
concentration of acidic solution.
b. To measure the wall pipe thickness due to corrosion using Ultrasonic
Testing Thickness Measurements (UTTM).
c. To produce a program that models a C-scan presentation of the corrosion
activities in the pipe from A-scan presentation obtained from UTTM
using MATLAB Programming.
1.4 Scope of Study
This study is focused on the internal corrosion in pipelines, where the corrosion
is the main problem since a long time ago. This experiment is to study the corrosion
activities in a pipe with using a different concentration of acid. Then, the thickness of
pipe will be measure with using the Ultrasonic Testing, where every different
concentration of acid affects the different corrosion rate. The acid that is used on this
experiment is a hydrochloric acid (HCl), and the various concentration of acid that will
be used is 30%, 50% and 70% concentration per volume. For one specimen, there have
108 points of thickness need to be measured. The thickness reading taken is doing by
weekly from week one until week ten. The results of corrosion activities will be present
as a program that models a C-scan from A-scan presentation obtained from Ultrasonic
Testing Thickness Measurement (UTTM) method. MATLAB Programming is using to
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Corrosion in Pipelines
According to A. Cosham, P. Hopkins, K.A. Macdonald (2007), corrosion is an
electrochemical process where it is a time dependent mechanism and depends on the
local environment within or adjacent to the pipeline. Corrosion usually appears as either
general corrosion or localizes (pitting) corrosion. There are many different types of
corrosion, including galvanic corrosion, microbiologically induced corrosion, alternate
current (AC) corrosion, differential soils, differential aeration and cracking. Corrosion
causes metal loss. It can occur on the internal or external surfaces of the pipe, in the base
material, the seam weld, the girth weld, and/or the associated heat affected zone (HAZ).
According to Bolt R and Owen RW (1999), the internal and external corrosion
are together one of the major causes of pipeline failures. Data for onshore gas
transmission pipelines in Western Europe for the period from 1970 to 1997 indicates that
17% of all incidents resulting in a loss of gas were due to corrosion.
On the latest researching by Eiber , Miele and Wilson (2002), incident data from
the Office of Pipeline Safety in the USA for the year 2001 attributes 29% of incidents in