Fungsi Pengadilan Negeri Dalam Penerapan Hak Derivatif Sesuai Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun...

(1)

FUNGSI PENGADILAN NEGERI DALAM PENERAPAN HAK

DERIVATIF SESUAI DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR1 TAHUN

1995 TENTANG PERSEROAN TERBATAS

TESIS

Diajukan Untuk Memperoleh Gelar Magister Humaniora (M.Hum)

Pada Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Ilmu Hukum

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Oleh :

FAUZIAH LUBIS

037005040 / ILMU HUKUM

PROGRAM PASCASARJANA

UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA

MEDAN

2005

Fauziah Lubis : Fungsi Pengadilan Negeri Dalam Penerapan Hak Derivatif Sesuai Dengan Undang…, 2005

(2)

(3)

Vonnis. Perubahan-perubahan ini hares benar-benar dicermati oleh Hakim dalam memeriksa dan menyelesaikan perkara yang berkaitan dengan pengelolaan perseroan agar sesuai dengan undang-undang Perseroan Terbatas, Anggaran Dasar Perseroan dan fungsi Pengadilan sesuai dengan ketentuan undang-undang Nomor 4 tahun 2004 tentang Kehakiman, maka untuk itu penulis menganalisis putusan dan penetapan gugatan dan permohonan derivatif dari pemegang saham minoritas di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara

Kata Kunci :

1. Fungsi Pengadilan Negeri 2. Hak Derivatif

3. Perseroan Terbatas

(4)

THE PURPOSE OF COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE'S IN IMPLEMENTING DERIVATIVE RIGHT IN ACCORDANCE WITH

CORPORATE ACT NO. 1 YEAR 1995

FAUZIAH LUBIS *)

B i s m a r N a s u t i o n

N i n g r u m N a t a s y a S i r a i t

Runtung Sitepu **)

ABSTRACT

Corporate Act No. 1 Year 1995 is a breakthrough such as transferring corporate law conception which is derived from a different legal system or in other word from Common Law System Saxon to Civil Law system. Changing in material law has a great influence on formal law because the Judge's duty is to place a condition with the appropriate law and the truth basis and just for all parties. Law protection to the weak party especially to minority shareholders is given widely from the State through court. Their rights in the form to suit or plead to court so that they receive a court's decision or decree about the violated rights by the majority shareholders without compunction can be control as the first situation or in accordance with Corporate Act or Corporate Statute. In reality, the rules are in contrary or unidentified in private procedure. To avoid various interpretations from law apparatus (Court = Judge) in implementing the rules, therefore the court must create a formula about law procedures to handle cases of corporate. In the end, the court could give certainty and Corporate Act No. 1 Year 1995 would be effective. The main alteration is the other subject of law (Minority Shareholders) brings in a representative fashion as a derivative suit to court, before there is only known that the Director act as a subject of law in court's procedure, but in Corporate Act No. 1 Year 1995 is mention about other subject of law, that is minority shareholders. The other alteration is the form of plead that we have is Volunteer and the decree is called Constitutive Vonnis, but the Corporate Act No. 1 Year 1995 mention that the result from derivative plead from minority shareholders, the Court decides Condemnatory Vonnis. These alterations should be recognized by Judge in investigating and solving cases which have connection with corporate governance so it will have compatibility with Corporate Act, Corporate Statute, and the function of court in accordance with Judicial Affair Act No. 4 Year 2004, therefore I, as the author, will analyze the decision, the decree and the derivative plead from minority shareholders at Court of First Instance Jakarta Utara.