• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 4 between = avg = 4.0 overall = max = 4

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Membagikan "R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 4 between = avg = 4.0 overall = max = 4"

Copied!
10
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

LAMPIRAN

Lampiran 1 Pengujian Regresi (Ordinary Least Square) untuk Persamaan dengan Variabel Investasi Pemerintah Total

. regress y L.y pad ip is tk to

Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 48 ---+--- F( 6, 41) = 3015.88 Model | 35.9292414 6 5.9882069 Prob > F = 0.0000 Residual | .081407907 41 .001985559 R-squared = 0.9977 ---+--- Adj R-squared = 0.9974

Total | 36.0106493 47 .766184028 Root MSE = .04456 ---

y | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] ---+--- y | L1. | .9947476 .0207137 48.02 0.000 .9529154 1.03658 pad | .0104697 .0229019 0.46 0.650 -.0357816 .0567211 ip | .0148429 .0201877 0.74 0.466 -.025927 .0556129 isr | .026357 .0577353 0.46 0.650 -.0902417 .1429557 tk | -.0159015 .0269769 -0.59 0.559 -.0703824 .0385795 to | -.0581091 .0313401 -1.85 0.071 -.1214016 .0051834 _cons | .0522852 .2150363 0.24 0.809 -.3819893 .4865598 ---

(2)

Lampiran 2 Pengujian Panel Statis Fixed Effect untuk Persamaan dengan Variabel Investasi Pemerintah Total

xtreg y L.y pad ip is tk to, fe

Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 48 Group variable: prov Number of groups = 12 R-sq: within = 0.8984 Obs per group: min = 4 between = 0.9493 avg = 4.0 overall = 0.9484 max = 4 F(6,30) = 44.23 corr(u_i, Xb) = 0.6823 Prob > F = 0.0000 --- y | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] ---+--- y | L1. | .3957105 .0959387 4.12 0.000 .1997775 .5916436 pad | .0081945 .0329362 0.25 0.805 -.0590703 .0754593 ip | .0848774 .0402406 2.11 0.043 .0026952 .1670596 isr | -.0477333 .048287 -0.99 0.331 -.1463484 .0508818 tk | .4245797 .1273521 3.33 0.002 .1644921 .6846673 to | -.0065183 .0467642 -0.14 0.890 -.1020235 .088987 _cons | 2.584141 1.820786 1.42 0.166 -1.1344 6.302682 ---+--- sigma_u | .27907226 sigma_e | .02971426

rho | .98879013 (fraction of variance due to u_i) --- F test that all u_i=0: F(11, 30) = 5.65 Prob > F = 0.0001 . est sto fixed

. xttest3

Modified Wald test for groupwise heteroskedasticity in fixed effect regression model

H0: sigma(i)^2 = sigma^2 for all i chi2 (12) = 428.88

(3)

Lampiran 3 Pengujian Panel Statis Random Effect untuk Persamaan dengan Variabel Investasi Pemerintah Total

. xtreg y L.y pad ip is tk to, re

Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 48 Group variable: prov Number of groups = 12 R-sq: within = 0.7538 Obs per group: min = 4 between = 0.9997 avg = 4.0 overall = 0.9977 max = 4 Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(6) = 13801.56 corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

---

y | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] ---+--- y | L1.| .9884906 .0232373 42.54 0.000 .9429462 1.034035 pad | .0086373 .0249878 0.35 0.730 -.0403378 .0576125 ip | .0194664 .0220619 0.88 0.378 -.0237741 .0627068 isr | .0241405 .0582071 0.41 0.678 -.0899434 .1382244 tk | -.0086702 .0300748 -0.29 0.773 -.0676158 .0502754 to | -.0568285 .0340416 -1.67 0.095 -.1235488 .0098918 _cons | .0100759 .2397706 0.04 0.966 -.4598659 .4800178 ---+--- sigma_u | .00888387 sigma_e | .02971426

rho | .08205262 (fraction of variance due to u_i) --- . est sto random

. xttest0

Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects y[prov,t] = Xb + u[prov] + e[prov,t]

Estimated results: | Var sd = sqrt(Var) ---+--- y | .766184 .8753194 e | .0008829 .0297143 u | .0000789 .0088839 Test: Var(u) = 0 hi2(1) = 2.40 Prob > chi2 = 0.1214

(4)

Lampiran 4 Uji Kebaikan (Uji Hausman) antara Fixed dan Random Effect untuk Persamaan dengan Variabel Investasi Pemerintah Total

. hausman fixed random ---- Coefficients ----

| (b) (B) (b-B) sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B)) | fixed random Difference S.E.

---+--- L.y | .3957105 .9884906 -.5927801 .093082 pad | .0081945 .0086373 -.0004428 .0214571 ip | .0848774 .0194664 .0654111 .0336538 isr | -.0477333 .0241405 -.0718738 . tk | .4245797 -.0086702 .4332499 .1237499 to | -.0065183 -.0568285 .0503102 .0320634 --- b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg

B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic

chi2(6) = (b-B)'[(V_b-V_B)^(-1)](b-B) = 57.95

Prob>chi2 = 0.0000

(5)

Lampiran 5 Pengujian Panel Dinamis (FD-GMM) untuk Persamaan dengan Variabel Investasi Pemerintah Total

. xtabond y pad ip is tk to, two

Arellano-Bond dynamic panel-data est Number of obs = 36 Group variable: prov Number of groups = 12 Time variable: tahun Obs per group: min = 3

avg = 3 max = 3 Number of instruments = 12 Wald chi2(6) = 3395.12 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

Two-step results

--- y | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] ---+--- y | L1. | .6459881 .0359854 17.95 0.000 .575458 .7165183 pad | .0240306 .0106641 2.25 0.024 .0031293 .0449319 ip | .0380402 .0126101 3.02 0.003 .0133248 .0627556 is | -.001116 .0007248 -1.54 0.124 -.0025365 .0003045 tk | .2134423 .0745279 2.86 0.004 .0673702 .3595144 to | -.0558758 .0099183 -5.63 0.000 -.0753152 -.0364363 _cons | 1.960779 .9210196 2.13 0.033 .1556137 3.765944 ---

Warning: gmm two-step standard errors are biased; robust standard errors are recommended.

Instruments for differenced equation GMM-type: L(2/.).y

Standard: D.pad D.ip D.is D.tk D.to Instruments for level equation

Standard: _cons . estat abond

Arellano-Bond test for zero autocorrelation in first-differenced errors +---+ |Order | z Prob > z| |---+---| | 1 |-1.0691 0.2850 | | 2 | 1.0287 0.3036 | +---+ H0: no autocorrelation . estat sargan

Sargan test of overidentifying restrictions H0: overidentifying restrictions are valid chi2(5) = 5.785619

(6)

Lampiran 6 Pengujian Regresi (Ordinary Least Square) untuk Persamaan dengan Variabel Investasi Pemerintah untuk Keperluan Infrastruktur

regress y L.y pad ipI isr tk to

Source | SS df MS Number of obs = 48 ---+--- F( 6, 41) = 2967.45 Model | 35.9279158 6 5.98798597 Prob > F = 0.0000 Residual | .082733473 41 .00201789 R-squared = 0.9977 ---+--- Adj R-squared = 0.9974

Total | 36.0106493 47 .766184028 Root MSE = .04492 ---

y | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] ---+--- y | L1. | .9989047 .0212455 47.02 0.000 .9559984 1.041811 pad | .0184909 .0186364 0.99 0.327 -.0191461 .056128 ipI | .0267158 .1109349 0.24 0.811 -.1973218 .2507535 isr | -.0018663 .0724478 -0.03 0.980 -.1481775 .1444449 tk | -.0210101 .0265037 -0.79 0.433 -.0745355 .0325153 to | -.0474691 .0284391 -1.67 0.103 -.1049031 .0099649 _cons | .1489365 .1456143 1.02 0.312 -.1451375 .4430105

(7)

Lampiran 7 Pengujian Panel Statis Fixed Effect untuk Model Persamaan dengan Variabel Investasi Pemerintah untuk Keperluan Infrastruktur xtreg y L.y pad ipI isr tk to, fe

Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 48 Group variable: prov Number of groups = 12 R-sq: within = 0.8868 Obs per group: min = 4 between = 0.9240 avg = 4.0 overall = 0.9237 max = 4 F(6,30) = 39.15 corr(u_i, Xb) = 0.1617 Prob > F = 0.0000 ---

y | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] ---+--- y | L1. | .4449883 .1018338 4.37 0.000 .237016 .6529606 pad | .0451719 .0302542 1.49 0.146 -.0166154 .1069593 ipI | .0472535 .1231376 0.38 0.047 -.2042271 .298734 is | -.0245487 .0633617 -0.39 0.701 -.1539505 .1048532 tk | .5622102 .1234363 4.55 0.000 .3101197 .8143007 to | -.0121819 .0501893 -0.24 0.810 -.1146822 .0903183 _cons | .6472756 1.819932 0.36 0.725 -3.069522 4.364074 ---+--- sigma_u | .2518568 sigma_e | .03137559

rho | .98471772 (fraction of variance due to u_i) --- F test that all u_i=0: F(11, 30) = 4.91 Prob > F = 0.0002 . est sto fixed

. xttest3

Modified Wald test for groupwise heteroskedasticity in fixed effect regression model

H0: sigma(i)^2 = sigma^2 for all i chi2 (12) = 427.94

(8)

Lampiran 8 Pengujian Panel Statis Random Effect untuk Persamaan dengan Variabel Investasi Pemerintah untuk Keperluan Infrastruktur . xtreg y L.y pad ipI isr tk to, re

Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 48 Group variable: prov Number of groups = 12 R-sq: within = 0.7357 Obs per group: min = 4 between = 0.9998 avg = 4.0 overall = 0.9977 max = 4 Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(6) = 17804.70 corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 ---

y | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] ---+--- y | L1. | .9989047 .0212455 47.02 0.000 .9572642 1.040545 pad | .0184909 .0186364 0.99 0.321 -.0180358 .0550177 ipI | .0267158 .1109349 0.24 0.810 -.1907127 .2441443 isr | -.0018663 .0724478 -0.03 0.979 -.1438613 .1401287 tk | -.0210101 .0265037 -0.79 0.428 -.0729565 .0309363 to | -.0474691 .0284391 -1.67 0.095 -.1032088 .0082706 _cons | .1489365 .1456143 1.02 0.306 -.1364623 .4343352 ---+--- sigma_u | 0 sigma_e | .03137559

rho | 0 (fraction of variance due to u_i)

--- . est sto random

. xttest0

Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects y[prov,t] = Xb + u[prov] + e[prov,t]

Estimated results: | Var sd = sqrt(Var) ---+--- y | .766184 .8753194 e | .0009844 .0313756 u | 0 0 Test: Var(u) = 0 chi2(1) = 3.04 Prob > chi2 = 0.0811

(9)

Lampran 9 Uji Kebaikan (Uji Hausman) antara Fixed dan Random Effect untuk Persamaan dengan Variabel Investasi Pemerintah untuk Keperluan

Infrastruktur . hausman fixed random ---- Coefficients ----

| (b) (B) (b-B) sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B)) | fixed random Difference S.E.

---+--- L.y | .4449883 .9989047 -.5539164 .0995929 pad | .0451719 .0184909 .026681 .0238327 jlnr | .0472535 .0267158 .0205376 .0534444 isr | -.0245487 -.0018663 -.0226824 . tk | .5622102 -.0210101 .5832204 .1205573 to | -.0121819 -.0474691 .0352872 .0413543 --- b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg

B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic

chi2(6) = (b-B)'[(V_b-V_B)^(-1)](b-B) = 43.38

Prob>chi2 = 0.0000

(10)

Lampiran 10 Pengujian Panel Dinamis (FD-GMM) untuk Persamaan dengan Variabel Investasi Pemerintah untuk Keperluan Infrastruktur . xtabond y pad ipI isr tk to, two

Arellano-Bond dynamic panel-data est Number of obs = 36 Group variable: prov Number of groups = 12

Time variable: tahun Obs per group: min = 3 avg = 3 max = 3 Number of instruments = 12 Wald chi2(6) = 2041.09 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

Two-step results

--- y | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] ---+--- y | L1. | .7391827 .0797895 9.26 0.000 .5827982 .8955673 pad | .0316399 .0109124 2.90 0.004 .0102519 .0530279 ipI | .1502803 .0733305 2.05 0.040 .0065553 .2940054 isr | .0625037 .0314307 1.99 0.047 .0009007 .1241067 tk | .3055488 .1178583 2.59 0.010 .0745507 .5365468 to | -.0636979 .0196757 -3.24 0.001 -.1022615 -.0251342 _cons | -.3889274 1.351338 -0.29 0.773 -3.0375 2.259646 ---

Warning: gmm two-step standard errors are biased; robust standard errors are recommended.

Instruments for differenced equation GMM-type: L(2/.).y

Standard: D.pad D.jlnr D.isr D.tk D.to Instruments for level equation

Standard: _cons . estat abond

Arellano-Bond test for zero autocorrelation in first-differenced errors +---+ |Order | z Prob > z| |---+---| | 1 |-1.0558 0.2911 | | 2 | 1.051 0.2933 | +---+ H0: no autocorrelation . estat sargan

Sargan test of overidentifying restrictions H0: overidentifying restrictions are valid chi2(5) = 5.465542

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Adanya gula yang terikat pada flavonoida (bentuk yang umum ditemukan) cenderung menyebabkan flavonoida lebih mudah larut dalam air dan dengan demikian campuran pelarut yang

[r]

Untuk pengukuran polarisasi, saat wireless USB adapter yang ada di dalam waveguide antena wajanbolic berada pada posisi vertikal dan antena pada access point juga pada

siswa belajar bahan-bahan pelajaran yang disampaikan secepat kemampuan mereka dantingkat pengetahuan dan keterampilan yang telah ada sebelumnya. Dengan demikian,

Subyek penelitian adalah orang – orang yang dapat memberikan sebuah informasi tentang sesuatu yang sedang di teliti. Peneliti akan memfokuskan penelitiannya

Yang mana akan dipilih pendekatan yang terbaik dari common effect, fixed effect, random effect dengan cara menggunakan suatu uji regresi data panel yaitu Uji Chow, Uji Hausman,

This research is aimed at knowing the goal orientation difference of learninf achievement in physical education between students having Javanese ethnic background and those

Juga penelitian yang dilakukan oleh Hunter (2004) bahwa ada ada hubungan antara motivasi kerja dengan burnout pada perawat, yakni bahwa semakin tinggi motivasi kerja