JUDUL PENELITIAN :
“HUBUNGAN ASUPAN LEMAK DENGAN
KETEBALAN TUNIKA INTIMA-MEDIA ARTERI KAROTIS INTERNA
PADA PENDERITA PASCA STROKE ISKEMIK”
INSTALASI PELAKSANA : BAGIAN NEUROLOGI RSUP Dr. KARIADI SEMARANG
Persetujuan Setelah Penjelasan
(INFORMED CONSENT)
Bapak/Ibu/Sdr Yth
Anda terpilih sebagai responden penelitian yang berhubungan dengan Faktor Risiko Gizi
(Asupan lemak) dan Gaya Hidup pada pasien stroke yang anda/keluarga anda alami. Apabila
bapak/ ibu/ saudara setuju sebagai peserta penelitian maka tindakan yang akan Bapak/Ibu/Saudara
alami :
Dilakukan anamnesis dan pemeriksaan fisik dan klinis neurologi, dengan wawancara dan
menggunakan palu refleks serta senter.
Pemeriksaan laboratorium dengan pengambilan darah.
Pemeriksaan USG Dupleks Karotis untuk menilai ketebalan dinding arteri karotis interna.
Kunjungan ke rumah untuk konfirmasi pola diet, ukuran dalam penyajian, dan hal-hal lain yang
berhubungan dengan diet, terutama diet lemak.
Penelitian ini mempunyai risiko berupa rasa sakit sewaktu dilakukan pengambilan darah.
Keuntungan Bapak/ Ibu/ Saudara ikut dalam penelitian ini adalah mengetahui dan mendapat penjelasan
tentang pola diet terutama diet lemak, dan beberapa pemeriksaan lainnya; serta ketebalan tunika intima
media arteri karotis interna sebagai faktor risiko stroke yang anda/ keluarga anda alami sehingga
dikemudian hari dapat digunakan sebagai indikator keberhasilan pengobatan yang dijalani.
Setiap data (anamnesis, pemeriksaan fisik, hasil laboratorium dan hasil USG Dupleks Karotis) dijamin
kerahasiaannya. Sebagai responden keikutsertaan dalam penelitian ini bersifat sukarela, setiap waktu
Bapak/ Ibu/ Saudara dapat mengundurkan diri dari penelitian ini tanpa mengurangi kualitas terapi yang
dijalani.
Bapak/ Ibu/ Saudara dapat menghubungi kami sebagai peneliti :
Nama
: dr. Edi Mulyanto
Alamat
: Jl. Wonosari I/41 Semarang
HP
: 081 325 451 835
Setelah mendengar dan memahami penjelasan penelitian, dengan ini saya :
Nama :...
Alamat : ...
Menyatakan
SETUJU / TIDAK SETUJU
untuk ikut sebagai responden penelitian.
Semarang, _______________
Peserta penelitian
Saksi
Peneliti
KUESIONER PENELITIAN
FAKTOR RISIKO GIZI, GAYA HIDUP DAN FAKTOR RISIKO LAIN DENGAN
DERAJAT ATEROSKLEROSIS PADA PASIEN PASCA STROKE ISKEMIK
PENELITIAN PAYUNG:
HUBUNGAN ASUPAN LEMAK DENGAN
ATEROSKLEROSIS (PENEBALAN IMT) ARTERI KAROTIS INTERNA
PADA PASIEN PASCA STROKE ISKEMIK
1.
Nama
: ...
2.
Tgl lahir / Umur
: ...
3.
Pekerjaan
: ...
4.
Alamat
: ...
Telpon Rumah/Hp...
5.
No RM
: ...
KUISIONER DATA UMUM DAN KLINIK
6
Penggunaan kontrasepsi hormonal :
12
Riwayat demam 3 bulan terakhir
1. Ya
2. Tidak
1.
2.
13
Riwayat batuk lama 3 bulan terakhir
1. Ya
2. Tidak
1.
2.
14
Riwayat sakit kencing 3 bulan terakhir
1. Ya
2. Tidak
1.
2.
15
Riwayat sakit saluran cerna 3 bulan terakhir
1. Ya
2. Tidak
1.
2.
16
Riwayat sakit gondok (struma/ tiroid)
1. Ya
2. Tidak
1.
2.
17
Riwayat sakit gangguan fungsi ginjal
1. Ya
2. Tidak
1.
2.
18
Riwayat sakit gangguan fungsi hati
1. Ya
2. Tidak
1.
2.
45
Sistolik saat kontrol di RSDK
46
Diastolik saat kontrol di RSDK
PEMERIKSAAN NEUROIMEJING
53
Lokasi Hasil CT Scan (Dx Topis) : hemisfer ka
1.
Kapsula interna 4. Cortex
2.
putamen
5. Batang Otak
54
Lokasi Hasil CT Scan (Dx Topis : hemisfer ki
4.
Kapsula interna 4. Cortex
56
USG duplex Carotis Interna
Ketebalan IMT :
...
65
Kadar Total Kolesterol (mg%) :
66
Kadar Trigliserida (mg%) :
67
Kadar LDL (mg%) :
68
Kadar HDL (mg%) :
69
Apolipoprotein B
PEMERIKSAAN PENUNJANG
72
Elektro Kardiografi (EKG)
1. Normo Sinus Rhytm (NSR) 3.Iskemik/ Infark
2. AF
4. ...
1.
2.
3.
4.
TERAPI
79
Statin selama rawat inap: 10 mg
1. Ya
2. Tidak
1.
2.
80
Statin selama rawat inap: 20 mg
1. Ya
2. Tidak
1.
2.
81
Fibrat selama rawat inap: 100 mg.
1. Ya
2. Tidak
1.
2.
82
Fibrat selama rawat inap: 200 mg
1. Ya
2. Tidak
1.
2.
83
Fibrat selama rawat inap: 300 mg
1. Ya
2. Tidak
1.
2.
Semarang, ………
Petugas pencatat
FORM FOOD FREQUENCY SEMI-QUANTITATIVE
Nama Subjek:
No. Registrasi Penelitian:
Alamat :
Tanggal Pengambilan Data:
Petugas:
No
Makanan
Estimasi
Waktu Konsumsi
URT/
No
Makanan
Estimasi
Waktu Konsumsi
URT/
makan
… x hari
… x minggu … x bulan
4
Sayuran
5
Buah
6
Susu dan olahan
7
Makanan jajan
HASIL PENGHITUNGAN ASUPAN MAKANAN DENGAN PROGRAM NUTRISOFT:
Ny. STYM, SUBJEK NO.62
HASIL PENGHITUNGAN ASUPAN MAKANAN DENGAN PROGRAM NUTRISOFT:
Ny. STYM, SUBJEK NO.62 (Lanjutan 1)
HASIL PENGHITUNGAN ASUPAN MAKANAN DENGAN PROGRAM NUTRISOFT:
Ny. STYM, SUBJEK NO.62 (Lanjutan 2)
LAMPIRAN CONTOH HASIL USG DUPLEK
1.
Subyek no. 32 (Tn Suh)
a.
Ketebalan Tunika intima-media arteri karotis interna kanan : 0,5 mm
b.
Ketebalan Tunika intima-media arteri karotis interna kiri : 0,6 mm
2.
Subyek No 23 (Ny. Sul)
a.
Ketebalan Tunika intima media arteri karotis interna kanan : 0,8 mm
b.
Ketebalan Tunika intima media arteri karotis interna kiri : 0,9 mm
Analisis Deskriptif data numerik
Media Asupan Serat
Asupan
Cholesterol percent_fat percent_SAF
percent_
Std. Deviation 91.309 8.83361 6.84669 2.03780 2,53139
Explore
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent Tunika Intima Media 62 100.0% 0 .0% 62 100.0%
Descriptives
Statistic Std. Error
Tunika Intima Media Mean .856 .0344
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Std. Deviation .2708
Minimum .3
Maximum 1.5
Range 1.2
Interquartile Range .3
Skewness .337 .304
Kurtosis -.251 .599
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Data Kategori :
Jenis Kelamin
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid
> = 55
42
67.7
67.7
67.7
<55
20
32.3
32.3
100.0
Total
62
100.0
100.0
Status Jarak dari Onset
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid
>24
33
53.3
53.3
53.3
< = 24
29
46.7
46,7
100.0
Total
62
100.0
100.0
Skor Mod Ran Scale
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Ya
24
38.7
38.7
38.7
Tidak
38
61.3
61.3
100.0
Status Obesitas
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Hipertensi 54 87.1 87.1 87.1
Tidak 8 12.9 12.9 100.0
Total 62 100.0 100.0
Status Diabetes Mellitus
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Dislipid 46 74.2 74.2 74.2
Tidak 16 25.8 25.8 100.0
Total 62 100.0 100.0
Penebalan Tunika Intima-Media
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid Abnormal 25 40.3 40.3 40.3
Normal 37 59.7 59.7 100.0
Total 62 100.0 100.0
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid < 2% 2 3.2 3.2 3.2
> = 2% 60 96.8 96.8 100.0
Total 62 100.0 100.0
Kategori Cholesterol Asupan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square 6.452a
1 .011
Continuity Correctionb 5.204 1 .023
Likelihood Ratio 6.570 1 .010
Fisher's Exact Test .019 .011
Linear-by-Linear Association 6.348 1 .012
N of Valid Casesb 62
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12,10. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for kategori lemak total
(>30 % / <=30 %) 3.923 1.335 11.527 For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima =
Abnormal 2.267 1.152 4.460
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima =
Normal .578 .366 .911
N of Valid Cases 62
Crosstab Count
Penebalan Tunika Intima
Total Abnormal Normal
kategori lemak >30 % 17 13 30
<=30 % 8 24 32
Kategori SFA * Penebalan Tunika Intima
Crosstab
Count
Penebalan Tunika Intima
Total Abnormal Normal
Kategori SFA >10 % 14 26 40
Pearson Chi-Square 1.327a
1 .249
Continuity Correctionb .777 1 .378
Likelihood Ratio 1.319 1 .251
Fisher's Exact Test .288 .189
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.306 1 .253
N of Valid Casesb 62
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,87. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Kategori SFA (>10 % / < = 10 %)
.538 .187 1.552
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal
.700 .386 1.268
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal
1.300 .808 2.092
kategori PUFA * Penebalan Tunika Intima
Crosstab
Count
Penebalan Tunika Intima
Total Abnormal Normal
kategori PUFA < 6% 15 28 43
Pearson Chi-Square 1.725a
1 .189
Continuity Correctionb 1.066 1 .302
Likelihood Ratio 1.708 1 .191
Fisher's Exact Test .263 .151
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.697 1 .193
N of Valid Casesb 62
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,66. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for kategori PUFA (< 6% / > = 6%)
.482 .161 1.445
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal
.663 .367 1.196
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal
1.375 .816 2.317
Kategori MUFA * Penebalan Tunika Intima
Crosstab
Count
Penebalan Tunika Intima
Total Abnormal Normal
Kategori MUFA < 2% 0 2 2
Pearson Chi-Square 1.396a
1 .237
Continuity Correctionb .202 1 .653
Likelihood Ratio 2.110 1 .146
Fisher's Exact Test .511 .352
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.374 1 .241
N of Valid Casesb 62
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,81. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal
1.714 1.384 2.123
Kategori Cholesterol * Penebalan Tunika Intima
Crosstab
Count
Penebalan Tunika Intima
Total Abnormal Normal
Kategori Chol >= 300 mg 4 3 7
Pearson Chi-Square .928a
1 .335
Continuity Correctionb .307 1 .579
Likelihood Ratio .908 1 .341
Fisher's Exact Test .425 .286
Linear-by-Linear Association .913 1 .339
N of Valid Casesb 62
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,82. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Kategori Chol (>= 300 mg / < 300 mg)
2.159 .439 10.615
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal
1.497 .725 3.088
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal
.693 .287 1.672
Jenis Kelamin * Penebalan Tunika Intima
Crosstab
Count
Penebalan Tunika Intima
Total Abnormal Normal
Jenis Kelamin L 17 22 39
Pearson Chi-Square .466a
1 .495
Continuity Correctionb .172 1 .678
Likelihood Ratio .470 1 .493
Fisher's Exact Test .596 .341
Linear-by-Linear Association .459 1 .498
N of Valid Casesb 62
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,27. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Jenis Kelamin (L / P) 1.449 .499 4.208 For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima =
Abnormal 1.253 .645 2.434
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima =
Normal .865 .576 1.299
Status usia * Penebalan Tunika Intima
Crosstab
Count
Penebalan Tunika Intima
Total Abnormal Normal
Status usia > = 55 22 20 42
Continuity Correctionb 6.391 1 .011
Likelihood Ratio 8.575 1 .003
Fisher's Exact Test .006 .005
Linear-by-Linear Association 7.740 1 .005
N of Valid Casesb 62
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,06. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Status usia (> = 55 /
<55) 6.233 1.586 24.497
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima =
Abnormal 3.492 1.183 10.308
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima =
Normal .560 .388 .808
Status Jarak waktu dari Onset stroke * Penebalan Tunika Intima
Penebalan Tunika Intima
Total Abnormal Normal
Status Onset >24 Count 19 14 33
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.727a 1 .003
Continuity Correctionb 7.262 1 .007
Likelihood Ratio 9.056 1 .003
Fisher's Exact Test .004 .003
Linear-by-Linear Association 8.587 1 .003
N of Valid Cases 62
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11,69. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper Odds Ratio for Status Onset (>24 /
<=24)
5.202 1.675 16.154
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal
2.783 1.288 6.013
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal
.535 .345 .830
Riwayat Merokok * Penebalan Tunika Intima
Crosstab
Count
Penebalan Tunika Intima
Total Abnormal Normal
Riwayat Merokok Ya 12 12 24
Pearson Chi-Square 1.524a
1 .217
Continuity Correctionb .938 1 .333
Likelihood Ratio 1.518 1 .218
Fisher's Exact Test .290 .166
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.499 1 .221
N of Valid Casesb 62
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,68. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Riwayat Merokok (Ya / Tidak)
1.923 .677 5.461
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal
1.462 .806 2.651
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal
.760 .479 1.205
Status Obesitas * Penebalan Tunika Intima
Crosstab
Count
Penebalan Tunika Intima
Total Abnormal Normal
Status Obesitas Obes 10 13 23
Pearson Chi-Square .151a
1 .697
Continuity Correctionb .015 1 .904
Likelihood Ratio .151 1 .698
Fisher's Exact Test .791 .450
Linear-by-Linear Association .149 1 .700
N of Valid Casesb 62
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,27. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Status Obesitas (Obes / Tidak)
1.231 .432 3.506
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal
1.130 .613 2.085
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal
.918 .594 1.420
Status Hipertensi * Penebalan Tunika Intima
Crosstab
Count
Penebalan Tunika Intima
Total Abnormal Normal
Status Hipertensi Hipertensi 22 32 54
Pearson Chi-Square .030a
1 .862
Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .031 1 .861
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .590
Linear-by-Linear Association .030 1 .863
N of Valid Casesb 62
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,23. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Status Hipertensi (Hipertensi / Tidak)
1.146 .248 5.296
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal
1.086 .420 2.811
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal
.948 .531 1.694
Status Diabetes Mellitus * Penebalan Tunika Intima
Crosstab
Count
Penebalan Tunika Intima
Total Abnormal Normal
Diabetes Mellitus DM 6 13 19
Pearson Chi-Square .870a
1 .351
Continuity Correctionb .425 1 .514
Likelihood Ratio .886 1 .347
Fisher's Exact Test .410 .259
Linear-by-Linear Association .856 1 .355
N of Valid Casesb 62
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,66. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Diabetes Mellitus (DM / Tidak) .583 .187 1.822 For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal .715 .340 1.501 For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal 1.226 .818 1.838
Analisis HbA1C & IMT
Status HbA1c
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Tinggi
11
17.7
17.7
17.7
Normal
51
82.3
82.3
100.0
Total
62
100.0
100.0
Penebalan Tunika Intima * Status HbA1c Crosstabulation
Status HbA1c
Total
Tinggi
Normal
Penebalan Tunika Intima
Abnormal
Count
5
20
25
% within Penebalan Tunika
Intima
20.0%
80.0% 100.0%
Normal
Count
6
31
37
% within Penebalan Tunika
Intima
16.2%
83.8% 100.0%
Total
Count
11
51
62
% within Penebalan Tunika
Intima
Continuity Correction
b.002
1
.965
Likelihood Ratio
.145
1
.703
Fisher's Exact Test
.744
.477
Linear-by-Linear Association
.144
1
.704
N of Valid Cases
62
a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,44.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower
Upper
Odds Ratio for Penebalan
Tunika Intima (Abnormal /
Normal)
1.292
.347
4.803
For cohort Status HbA1c =
Tinggi
1.233
.422
3.606
For cohort Status HbA1c =
Normal
.955
.750
1.216
Analisis GD 1, GD 2, HbA1C & IMT
Tunika Intima Media
Pearson Correlation
1
.048
-.044
-.032
Sig. (2-tailed)
.712
.736
.805
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Nonparametric Correlations
Correlation Coefficient
1.000
.064
.029
-.006
Sig. (2-tailed)
.
.622
.822
.965
N
62
62
62
62
HbA1C
Correlation Coefficient
.064
1.000
.442
**.389
**Sig. (2-tailed)
.622
.
.000
.002
N
62
62
62
62
Gula Darah
Puasa
Correlation Coefficient
.029
.442
**1.000
.446
**Sig. (2-tailed)
.822
.000
.
.000
N
62
62
62
62
Gula Darah 2
jm Post
Prandial
Correlation Coefficient
.006
.389
**.446
**1.000
Sig. (2-tailed)
.965
.002
.000
.
N
62
62
62
62
Status Dislipidemia * Penebalan Tunika Intima
Crosstab
Count
Penebalan Tunika Intima
Total Abnormal Normal
Dislipidemia Dislipid 18 28 46
Pearson Chi-Square .105a
1 .746
Continuity Correctionb .001 1 .977
Likelihood Ratio .105 1 .746
Fisher's Exact Test .774 .485
Linear-by-Linear Association .104 1 .748
N of Valid Casesb 62
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,45. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
Value
95% Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Dislipidemia (Dislipid / Tidak)
.827 .261 2.615
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal
.894 .461 1.734
For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal
1.082 .663 1.767
Logistic Regression
Usia, Jarak Waktu dari Onset Stroke, Riw. Merokok, Lemak Total, SFA, MUFA
Dependent Variable EncodingOriginal Value Internal Value
Normal 0
Abnormal 1
Categorical Variables Codings
Frequency
Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)
Model Summary
Step -2 Log likelihood
Cox & Snell R
Square Nagelkerke R Square
1 54.647a .373 .504
2 54.674a .373 .504
3 55.376a .366 .494
Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
Step Chi-square df Sig.
1 13.807 8 .087
2 12.373 8 .135
3 5.556 8 .697
Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test
IMTproregresi = Normal IMTproregresi = Abnormal
Total Observed Expected Observed Expected
Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
95% C.I.for EXP(B)
Lower Upper Step 1a Status_Usia(1) 2.139 .902 5.626 1 .018 8.491 1.450 49.726
Status_Onset(1) 1.936 .741 6.834 1 .009 6.930 1.623 29.589 Riw.Rokok(1) .582 .698 .695 1 .404 1.789 .456 7.026 kat_lemak(1) 2.133 .836 6.503 1 .011 8.438 1.638 43.468 kat_SFA(1) -1.553 .840 3.415 1 .065 .212 .041 1.099 kat_PUFA(1) -.151 .924 .027 1 .870 .859 .140 5.258 Constant -3.278 1.556 4.440 1 .035 .038
Step 2a Status_Usia(1) 2.159 .895 5.821 1 .016 8.661 1.499 50.026 Status_Onset(1) 1.948 .739 6.956 1 .008 7.014 1.649 29.827 Riw.Rokok(1) .583 .698 .698 1 .404 1.791 .456 7.034 kat_lemak(1) 2.190 .764 8.215 1 .004 8.935 1.999 39.947 kat_SFA(1) -1.495 .760 3.872 1 .049 .224 .051 .994 Constant -3.470 1.041 11.113 1 .001 .031
Step 3a Status_Usia(1) 2.222 .898 6.119 1 .013 9.225 1.586 53.651 Status_Onset(1) 1.910 .734 6.770 1 .009 6.756 1.602 28.488 kat_lemak(1) 2.191 .758 8.348 1 .004 8.941 2.023 39.514 kat_SFA(1) -1.447 .762 3.602 1 .058 .235 .053 1.048 Constant -3.304 .999 10.940 1 .001 .037