• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Some of operating AD  performed poor Evaluated by monitoring only the 

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Membagikan "Some of operating AD  performed poor Evaluated by monitoring only the "

Copied!
12
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Presented by : Presented by :

HERTO DWI ARIESYADY HERTO DWI ARIESYADY

Ecophysiological

 

Studies

 

on

 

Biodiversity

 

of

 

Fatty

 

Acids

Ecophysiological

 

Studies

 

on

 

Biodiversity

 

of

 

Fatty

 

Acids

‐‐

Utilizing

Utilizing

 

 

B

Bacteria

acteria

and

and

 

 

A

Archaea

rchaea

in

in

 

 

Anaerobic

Anaerobic

 

 

Digester

Digester

 

 

Treating

Treating

 

 

Domestic

Domestic

 

 

Wastewater

 

Analyzed

 

by

 

Molecular

 

Biological

 

Techniques

Wastewater

 

Analyzed

 

by

 

Molecular

 

Biological

 

Techniques

Ecophysiological

 

Studies

 

on

 

Biodiversity

 

of

 

Fatty

 

Acids

Ecophysiological

 

Studies

 

on

 

Biodiversity

 

of

 

Fatty

 

Acids

‐‐

Utilizing

Utilizing

 

 

B

Bacteria

acteria

and

and

 

 

A

Archaea

rchaea

in

in

 

 

Anaerobic

Anaerobic

 

 

Digester

Digester

 

 

Treating

Treating

 

 

Domestic

Domestic

 

 

Wastewater

 

Analyzed

 

by

 

Molecular

 

Biological

 

Techniques

Wastewater

 

Analyzed

 

by

 

Molecular

 

Biological

 

Techniques

Academic Advisor : Prof.

Academic Advisor : Prof. YoshimasaYoshimasa WATANABEWATANABE Research Supervisor : Assoc. Prof. Satoshi OKABE Research Supervisor : Assoc. Prof. Satoshi OKABE

Water Quality Control Engineering Laboratory Water Quality Control Engineering Laboratory Urban Environmental Engineering Division Urban Environmental Engineering Division

Graduate School of Engineering Graduate School of Engineering

ReuseReuse‐‐recyclingrecycling

Land disposalLand disposal

Power consumption for WWTP : 1% Power consumption for WWTP : 1%

30

30‐‐50%50%  isis  forfor  sludgesludge  treatmenttreatment

Bio

Bio

‐‐

process

process

 

 

sludge

sludge

 

 

management

management

 

 

(in

(in

 

 

Japan)

Japan)

Bio

Bio

‐‐

process

process

 

 

sludge

sludge

 

 

management

management

 

 

(in

(in

 

 

Japan)

Japan)

Image is adopted from : Image is adopted from : www.veoliawater.com www.veoliawater.com

p p

• •CompostingComposting

AnaerobicAnaerobic‐‐digestiondigestion

40 40‐‐50%50%  

to reuse to reuse

<20% to disposal <20% to disposal

2

30 30‐‐40%40%  toto  ADAD

Wastewater Treatment System Wastewater Treatment System

Wastewater Generation

Wastewater Generation WaterWater  DischargeDischarge & Land Disposal & Land Disposal BUILT AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT

BUILT AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT

Application

 

of

 

anaerobic

 

digester

 

(AD)

Application

 

of

 

anaerobic

 

digester

 

(AD)

Application

 

of

 

anaerobic

 

digester

 

(AD)

Application

 

of

 

anaerobic

 

digester

 

(AD)

AD AD

Problems :

Problems : OutcomeOutcome  ::

• •SludgeSludge  volumevolume  

& its characteristics & its characteristics

EnergyEnergy  consumptionconsumption

LimitationLimitation  ofof  naturalnatural  resourcesresources

SmallSmall  amountamount  disposeddisposed  

sludge sludge

AlternativeAlternative  energyenergy  sourcesource

ConservationConservation  ofof  naturalnatural  

resources resources

3

Obstacles of AD application : Obstacles of AD application :

LowLow  growthgrowth  raterate  ofof  microbesmicrobes

LongLong  startingstarting‐‐up/recoveryup/recovery  periodperiod

LongLong  SolidSolid  RetentionRetention  TimeTime

HighHigh  interdependencyinterdependency  amongamong   microbial groups

microbial groups

susceptiblesusceptible  toto  pHpH  depletiondepletion

Problems

 

of

 

AD

 

application

Problems

 

of

 

AD

 

application

Problems

 

of

 

AD

 

application

Problems

 

of

 

AD

 

application

4 Some of operating AD  Some of operating AD 

performed poor performed poor

Evaluated by monitoring  Evaluated by monitoring onlyonly

the 

the physicophysico‐‐chemicalchemicalpropertiesproperties

Accumulation

Accumulationofof  fattyfatty  acidsacids

Propionate Propionate

Significance of propionate Significance of propionate‐‐ degradation : degradation :

SulfateSulfate  concentrationconcentration  

HH partial pressurepartial pressure

Anaerobic

 

digestion

 

processes

Anaerobic

 

digestion

 

processes

Anaerobic

 

digestion

 

processes

Anaerobic

 

digestion

 

processes

CH

CH33CHCH22COOCOO––+ 3+ 3HH22O CHO CH33COOCOO––+ + HCOHCO33––+ 3+ 3HH22+ H+ H++

ΔG

ΔGo o = +76 kJ/mol= +76 kJ/mol

5

We want to optimize We want to optimize

the performance  the performance  and stability of AD and stability of AD

By monitoring and controlling  By monitoring and controlling fattyfatty  

acids

acids‐‐oxidizingoxidizing  bacteriabacteriainin  ADAD

HH22partialpartial  pressurepressure

SyntrophicSyntrophic  associationassociation

1.

1. thethe  functionalfunctional  communitycommunity  structuresstructures  ofof  fattyfatty‐‐acidsacids  (propionate(propionate‐‐,,   butyrate

butyrate‐‐andand  acetateacetate‐‐))  utilizingutilizing  microbialmicrobial  communitiescommunitiesasas  wellwell  asas   glucose

glucose‐‐degradingdegrading  bacteriabacteria  asas  majormajor  trophictrophic  groupsgroups  inin  aa  realreal  plantplant  

AD AD

Through analyzing and characterizing : Through analyzing and characterizing :

GOAL : Optimizing the performance and stability of AD by 

GOAL : Optimizing the performance and stability of AD by 

controlling 

controlling ‘key‘key‐‐players’players’microbesmicrobes

The

 

objectives

The

 

objectives

The

 

objectives

The

 

objectives

AD AD,,  

2.

2. TheThe  comparisoncomparisonofof  thethe  diversitydiversity  ofof fattyfatty  acidsacids‐‐utilizingutilizingandand othersothers  

microbial community

microbial communityinin  aa  realreal  plantplantandandaa  modelmodel  laboratorylaboratory‐‐scalescale   ADs

ADsphylogenetically,phylogenetically,

3.

3. thetheabundanceabundance  andand  diversitydiversity  ofof  syntrophicsyntrophic  propionatepropionate‐‐oxidizingoxidizing   bacteria (POB) populations

bacteria (POB) populationsandand itsits  dynamicsdynamics  towardstowards  thetheeffecteffect  ofof   propionate concentration

propionate concentrationonon  thosethose  populationspopulations,,  inin  aa  modelmodel  

laboratory laboratory‐‐scalescale  ADAD..

(2)

Chapter 1

General General IntroductionIntroduction

Chapter 2

Functional

Functional Bacterial and Archaeal Community Bacterial and Archaeal Community StructuresStructuresof Majorof Major Trophic Groups in a Full

Trophic Groups in a Full--Scale Anaerobic Sludge DigesterScale Anaerobic Sludge Digester

Chapter 3

The

 

outline

 

of

 

the

 

thesis

The

 

outline

 

of

 

the

 

thesis

The

 

outline

 

of

 

the

 

thesis

The

 

outline

 

of

 

the

 

thesis

p

Assessment of Shift

Assessment of Shiftin Phylogenetic Microbial Diversity in Responsein Phylogenetic Microbial Diversity in Response to a Substrate Perturbation of a Mesophilic Anaerobic Digester to a Substrate Perturbation of a Mesophilic Anaerobic Digester

Chapter 4

Phylogenetic and Functional

Phylogenetic and Functional Diversity of PropionateDiversity of Propionate--Oxidizing Oxidizing Bacteria

Bacteriain an Anaerobic Digester Sludgein an Anaerobic Digester Sludge

Chapter 5

Conclusions

Conclusionsand Recommendationsand Recommendations

7

Milk Added Anaerobic Milk Added Anaerobic H

A B C

M S G

S H

A B C

M S G

S H

A B C

M S G

S H

A B C

M S G

S H

A B C

M S G

S H

A B C

M S G

S H

A B C

M S G

S H

A B C

M S G

S

Ebetsu City Anaerobic Ebetsu City Anaerobic Digester Plant Sludge Digester Plant Sludge

--Semi Batch Feeding Semi Batch Feeding -- Temp. = 37 Temp. = 37 ooCC

--Volume = 0.8 L Volume = 0.8 L -- pH = 6.5 pH = 6.5 –– 7.57.5

--SRT = 30 d SRT = 30 d

--C load = 1.5 gLC load = 1.5 gL--11dd--11

Digester Digester Digester Digester

Operation Condition Operation Condition

Research

 

design

Research

 

design

Research

 

design

Research

 

design

Phylogenetic Phylogenetic Analysis Analysis

Milk Added Anaerobic Milk Added Anaerobic

Digester Sludge Digester Sludge

MAR

MAR--DAPI analysisDAPI analysis MAR

MAR--FISH analysisFISH analysis

Micro Micro--manipulation manipulation

8

Functional community structure/substrate

uptake patterns

Phylogeny identity of intriguing cell

Digester Digester Performance Performance Digester Digester Performance Performance

Biodiversity and phylogeny affiliation

Samples Samples

Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy

CLSM

Fluorescence Transmission [14C] Substrates

3 h, 37oC Incubation

DAPI/FISH

MAR

MAR

MAR

‐‐

DAPI/FISH

DAPI/FISH

 

 

technique

technique

MAR

MAR

‐‐

DAPI/FISH

DAPI/FISH

 

 

technique

technique

Counting Counting Washing

Fixation

DAPI/FISH

DAPI/FISH

Microautoradiography

Microautoradiography

Making Film Exposure Development

Silver grain by MAR

9

Functional

 

Bacterial

 

and

 

Archaeal

 

Community

 

Structures

 

of

 

Functional

 

Bacterial

 

and

 

Archaeal

 

Community

 

Structures

 

of

 

Major

 

Trophic

 

Groups

 

in

 

a

 

Full

Major

 

Trophic

 

Groups

 

in

 

a

 

Full

‐‐

Scale

Scale

 

 

Anaerobic

Anaerobic

 

 

Sludge

Sludge

 

 

Digester

Digester

(Water Research, 2007, doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.12.036)

Chapter

Chapter

2

2

Chapter

Chapter

2

2

Discussion Topic: Discussion Topic:

the community structures (diversity and relative abundance) the community structures (diversity and relative abundance)of of major bacterial and archaeal trophic communities groups in major bacterial and archaeal trophic communities groups in anaerobic digester sludge

anaerobic digester sludge

11

Functional

 

Microbial

 

Groups

 

of

 

AD

Functional

 

Microbial

 

Groups

 

of

 

AD

Functional

 

Microbial

 

Groups

 

of

 

AD

Functional

 

Microbial

 

Groups

 

of

 

AD

Lactose

G alactose G lucose

Propionate

hydrolytic bacteria

Polym er

G alactose G lucose

Propionate

ferm entative bacteria

Lactose

G alactose G lucose

Propionate

hydrolytic bacteria

Polym er

G alactose G lucose

Propionate

ferm entative bacteria

C H4 C O2

H2, C O2 A cetate

C H4 C O2

B utyrate

fatty

acids-oxidizing bacteria m ethanogens

C H4 C O2

H2, C O2 A cetate

C H4 C O2

B utyrate

fatty

acids-oxidizing bacteria m ethanogens

The most susceptible members : 

The most susceptible members : propionatepropionate‐‐,,  butyratebutyrate‐‐,,  acetateacetate‐‐utilizingutilizing  microbesmicrobes

(3)

Their diversity and population sizes Their diversity and population sizes

are

are still unknownstill unknown

Information is 

Information is neededneededtoto  enhanceenhance   the performance & stability of AD the performance & stability of AD

The

 

objectives

The

 

objectives

The

 

objectives

The

 

objectives

p y

p y

13

• Functional community structure(diversity & abundance)

of major trophic groups of propionate-, butyrate-,

acetate-andglucose-utilizing microbes To characterize, quantify :

Milk Added Anaerobic Milk Added Anaerobic

H

Ebetsu City Anaerobic Ebetsu City Anaerobic Digester Plant Sludge Digester Plant Sludge

--Semi Batch Feeding Semi Batch Feeding

Operation Condition Operation Condition

• mesophilic (40ºC) twomesophilic (40ºC) two‐‐phase ADphase AD •

• intermittent substrate of excess sludge from WWTP intermittent substrate of excess sludge from WWTP  for 120,000 p.e.

• C load = 2.5 kg mC load = 2.5 kg m‐‐33dayday‐‐11 •

• phosphate phosphate ≈≈4 mM4 mM •

• Gas production = 1 Gas production = 1 ××101066mm33yearyear‐‐11, with 55% CH, with 55% CH 4

Phylogenetic Phylogenetic Analysis Analysis

Milk Added Anaerobic Milk Added Anaerobic

Digester Sludge Digester Sludge

MAR

MAR--DAPI analysisDAPI analysis MAR

MAR--FISH analysisFISH analysis

Micro Micro--manipulation manipulation

Group-specific FISH probes.

[14C]glucose,[14C]propionate, [14C]butyrate,[14C]acetate.

Most active MAR-positive cells Digester Digester Performance Performance

Universal Bacteriaand

Archaeaprimer sets

14

Microbial

 

diversity

 

in

 

AD

 

(clones

 

library)

Microbial

 

diversity

 

in

 

AD

 

(clones

 

library)

Microbial

 

diversity

 

in

 

AD

 

(clones

 

library)

Microbial

 

diversity

 

in

 

AD

 

(clones

 

library)

Most frequent

Most frequentBacteriaBacteriaclones : clones : BacteroidetesBacteroidetes> > FirmicutesFirmicutes> > ChloroflexiChloroflexi Most frequent

Most frequentArchaeaArchaeaclones : clones : MethanosaetaMethanosaeta> > MethanospirillumMethanospirillum

QUANTIFICATION 

QUANTIFICATION ÆÆFISHFISHusingusing  groupgroup‐‐specificspecific  probesprobes

15

otal DA

P

I

(%) TotalTotal  specificspecific  BacteriaBacteria  probesprobes Total DAPI 

Total DAPI  Tot.Tot.  specificspecific  ArchaeaArchaea  probesprobes Total DAPI  Total DAPI  = 37%37%

= 13%13%

Total DAPI = 1.2 ×1010cells g‐VSS‐1

Microbial

 

diversity

 

in

 

AD

 

(FISH

 

analysis)

Microbial

 

diversity

 

in

 

AD

 

(FISH

 

analysis)

Microbial

 

diversity

 

in

 

AD

 

(FISH

 

analysis)

Microbial

 

diversity

 

in

 

AD

 

(FISH

 

analysis)

0 2 4

Name of probe

FISH-positiv

e

Bacteria Bacteria‐‐targetedtargeted  probesprobes Archaea Archaea‐‐targetedtargeted  probesprobes

16

Lactose

G alactose G lucose

Propionate

hydrolytic bacteria

Polym er

G alactose G lucose

Propionate

ferm entative bacteria

Lactose

G alactose G lucose

Propionate

hydrolytic bacteria

Polym er

G alactose G lucose

Propionate

ferm entative bacteria

Samples Samples

Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy

CLSM

Fluorescence Transmission [14C] Substrates

3 h, 37oC Incubation

WashingMicroautoradiographyMicroautoradiography

DAPI/FISH MAR Samples

Samples

Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy

CLSM CLSM CLSM

Fluorescence Transmission [14C] Substrates

3 h, 37oC Incubation

WashingMicroautoradiographyMicroautoradiography

DAPI/FISH MAR

Cross

Cross

‐‐

feeding

feeding

 

 

in

in

 

 

MAR

MAR

‐‐

FISH

FISH

 

 

experiment

experiment

Cross

Cross

‐‐

feeding

feeding

 

 

in

in

 

 

MAR

MAR

‐‐

FISH

FISH

 

 

experiment

experiment

C H4 C O2

H2, C O2 A cetate

C H4 C O2

B utyrate

fatty

acids-oxidizing bacteria m ethanogens

C H4 C O2

H2, C O2 A cetate

C H4 C O2

B utyrate

fatty

acids-oxidizing bacteria m ethanogens CountingCounting

Washing Fixation

DAPI/FISH

DAPI/FISH Making Film

Exposure Development

Silver grain by MAR

DAPI/FISH Making Film

Exposure Development

Silver grain by MAR

All of the process 

All of the process proceed simultaneouslyproceed simultaneously

Substrate cross

Substrate cross‐‐feedingfeeding  mightmight  occuroccur  atat  thethe   prolonged incubation time prolonged incubation time

17

Time

 

course

 

analysis

 

at

 

different

 

incubation

 

period

Time

 

course

 

analysis

 

at

 

different

 

incubation

 

period

Time

 

course

 

analysis

 

at

 

different

 

incubation

 

period

Time

 

course

 

analysis

 

at

 

different

 

incubation

 

period

9

9‐‐hh  incubationincubation  timetime  waswas  appropriateappropriateto prevent crossto prevent cross‐‐feedingfeeding

(4)

Green : GNSB Green : GNSB‐‐941941

Red     : EUB338 Red     : EUB338

Green : SmiSR354

Green : SmiSR354

Red     : EUB338 Red     : EUB338

Substrate

 

uptake

 

patterns

 

of

 

microbes

Substrate

 

uptake

 

patterns

 

of

 

microbes

Substrate

 

uptake

 

patterns

 

of

 

microbes

Substrate

 

uptake

 

patterns

 

of

 

microbes

Green : BET42a

Green : BET42a

Red     : EUB338 Red     : EUB338

Green : MX825

Green : MX825

Red     : ARC915 Red     : ARC915

19

Butyrate 3% Propionate 4%

Acetate 6% Glucose

10%

Functional

 

community

 

composition

 

(of

 

total

 

cells)

Functional

 

community

 

composition

 

(of

 

total

 

cells)

Functional

 

community

 

composition

 

(of

 

total

 

cells)

Functional

 

community

 

composition

 

(of

 

total

 

cells)

Others 77%

Glucose

Glucose--fermenting bacteriafermenting bacteria : 10%: 10%

Propionate

Propionate--utilizing bacteria utilizing bacteria : 4: 4%%

Butyrate

Butyrate--utilizing bacteriautilizing bacteria : 3% : 3% Acetate

Acetate--utilizing microbesutilizing microbes : 6%: 6% 20

27% GNSB-941

1%

TM7905 4%

Others

6% GAM42a

5% CFB719 <1% Spiro1400

6%

GNSB

GNSB--941941: : HGC69AHGC69A =

=33::11

Glucose

Glucose

‐‐

utilizing

utilizing

 

 

community

community

 

 

composition

composition

Glucose

Glucose

‐‐

utilizing

utilizing

 

 

community

community

 

 

composition

composition

13% HGC69A

GNSB 941

LGC354

39%

BET42a BET42a BET42a  : : BetaproteobacteriaBetaproteobacteria

GNSB

GNSB‐‐941 : 941 : ChloroflexiChloroflexi

HGC69A

HGC69A : : ActinobacteriaActinobacteria

Spiro1400  :  Spiro1400  : SpirochaetaSpirochaeta

TM7905

TM7905 : TM7 candidatus : TM7 candidatus  Hitherto unknown function  Hitherto unknown function 

Spirochaeta

Spirochaeta&&  TM7TM7  candidatuscandidatuswere were  found to be 

found to be glucoseglucose‐‐utilizersutilizers

21

48% 12%

Synbac824 10% Others

SmiSR354

SmiSR354: : Synbac824Synbac824 =

=33: : 11

Smithella sp. >> Syntrophobacter Smithella sp. >> Syntrophobacter

Propionate

Propionate

‐‐

utilizing

utilizing

 

 

community

community

 

 

composition

composition

Propionate

Propionate

‐‐

utilizing

utilizing

 

 

community

community

 

 

composition

composition

48% BET42a

30% SmiSR354

SmiSR354  : 

SmiSR354  : SmithellaSmithellasp. SR sp. SR  Synbac824 : 

Synbac824 : SyntrophobacterSyntrophobactersp.sp. To be related with  To be related with 

sulfate concentration sulfate concentration

22

11% LGC354

7%

Others Synm700Synm700: : LGC354LGC354

= =33: : 11

h h

Butyrate

Butyrate

‐‐

utilizing

utilizing

 

 

community

community

 

 

composition

composition

Butyrate

Butyrate

‐‐

utilizing

utilizing

 

 

community

community

 

 

composition

composition

48% BET42a

35% Synm700

Synm700 : 

Synm700 : SyntrophomonasSyntrophomonassp.sp. LGC354

LGC354 : Low: Low‐‐G+C bacteriaG+C bacteria Syntrophomonas Syntrophomonasgroup was group was  confirmed to be most important  confirmed to be most important 

butyrate butyrate‐‐oxidizeroxidizer

23

5% GAM42a

10% LGC354

1%

Syn773 3%

Others Bacteria

18% MX825

Bacteria Bacteria: : ArchaeaArchaea

= =11: : 11

Hitherto unknown function 

Hitherto unknown function SynergistesSynergisteswere were  found to be 

found to be acetateacetate‐‐utilizersutilizers

Acetate

Acetate

‐‐

utilizing

utilizing

 

 

community

community

 

 

composition

composition

Acetate

Acetate

‐‐

utilizing

utilizing

 

 

community

community

 

 

composition

composition

6% Others Archaea 55%

BET42a

MX825

1% MS821

GAM42a : 

GAM42a : GammaproteobacteriaGammaproteobacteria

Syn773   : 

Syn773   : SynergistesSynergistes  groupgroup MX825    : 

MX825    : MethanosaetaMethanosaeta

MS821    : 

MS821    : MethanosarcinaMethanosarcina Methanosaeta 

Methanosaeta sp. sp. ÆÆmost important most important ‐‐

acetoclastic methanogen acetoclastic methanogen

(5)

Betaproteobacteria Betaproteobacteria

was also identified as  was also identified as 

fatty

fatty‐‐acidsacids  utilizerutilizer

This group 

This group isis  notnot  affiliatedaffiliated  

with syntrophic 

with syntrophic 

association association

Identification

 

of

 

active

 

Betaproteobacteria

Identification

 

of

 

active

 

Betaproteobacteria

Identification

 

of

 

active

 

Betaproteobacteria

Identification

 

of

 

active

 

Betaproteobacteria

MAR+ MAR+ BET42a BET42a

Micromanipulation, Micromanipulation, FISH

FISH usingusing  specificspecific  probe,probe,

& DAPI & DAPI‐‐stainingstaining

25

association association

•• MARMAR--FISHFISH andand micromanipulationmicromanipulation analysisanalysis cancan bebe appliedapplied

successfully

successfully forfor identificationidentification andand characterizationcharacterization ofof functionalfunctional community

community structurestructure ofof majormajor trophictrophic groupsgroups inin ADAD..

•• TheThe fattyfatty acidsacids-- (esp(esp.. propionatepropionate-- && butyratebutyrate--)) utilizingutilizing

microorganisms

microorganismshadhad lowlow abundanceabundance andand wereweremoremore specializedspecialized

to

to aa fewfew phylogeneticphylogenetic groupsgroups comparedcompared toto glucoseglucose--degradingdegrading bacteria

bacteria..

Conclusions

Conclusions

Conclusions

Conclusions

•• MembersMembers ofof ChloroflexiChloroflexi,, SmithellaSmithella,, SyntrophomonasSyntrophomonas andand Methanosaeta

Methanosaeta groupsgroups dominateddominated thethe glucoseglucose--,, propionatepropionate--,, butyrate

butyrate-- andand acetateacetate--utilizingutilizing microorganismmicroorganism communitycommunity.

•• DespiteDespite thethe lowlow abundance,abundance, thethe hithertohitherto unknownunknown metabolicmetabolic functions

functions ofof microbesmicrobes representedrepresented byby nono oror fewfew cultivatedcultivated

representatives

representatives werewere identifiedidentified toto bebemembersmembers ofof thesethese groupsgroups..

27

Assessment of Shift in Phylogenetic Microbial Diversity in 

Assessment of Shift in Phylogenetic Microbial Diversity in 

Response to a Substrate Perturbation of a Mesophilic 

Response to a Substrate Perturbation of a Mesophilic 

Anaerobic Digester

Anaerobic Digester

Chapter

Chapter

3

3

Chapter

Chapter

3

3

Discussion Topic : Discussion Topic :

The

The comparisoncomparisonof of the the diversity ofdiversity of fatty acidsfatty acids--utilizingutilizingandand others microbial community

others microbial communityin a real plantin a real plantandanda model a model laboratory

laboratory--scale ADsscale ADsphylogeneticallyphylogenetically

28

COMPLEX Anaerobic Digester Plant

Substrate

 

variation

 

vs

 

microbial

 

diversity

Substrate

 

variation

 

vs

 

microbial

 

diversity

Substrate

 

variation

 

vs

 

microbial

 

diversity

Substrate

 

variation

 

vs

 

microbial

 

diversity

SIMPLE

L/ S Gas Collection Bag

Magnetic Stirrer 37 oC 0.8 L

Lab-scale Anaerobic Digester

29

• The phylogenetic diversity of functional groups

especially fatty acids-utilizing microbial community in

real AD plant sludgeand amodel laboratory-scale AD

sludge

To compare :

The

 

objectives

The

 

objectives

The

 

objectives

The

 

objectives

sludge

By application of :

Full

Full--length

length 16S rRNA

cloning analysis

(6)

Milk Added Anaerobic Milk Added Anaerobic

H

Ebetsu City Anaerobic Ebetsu City Anaerobic Digester Plant Sludge Digester Plant Sludge

(EADS)

Digester Digester Digester Digester

Operation Condition Operation Condition

Methodology

Methodology

Methodology

Methodology

Phylogenetic Phylogenetic Analysis Analysis

Digester Sludge Digester Sludge

(MADS) (MADS)

MAR

MAR--DAPI analysisDAPI analysis MAR

MAR--FISH analysisFISH analysis

Micro

Universal Bacteriaand

Archaeaprimer sets

• •FAFA  concentrationconcentration

• •GasGas  compositioncomposition

CC  contentcontent  (as(as  COD)COD)

• •SolidSolid  contentcontent

31

Diversity

 

of

 

bacterial

 

and

 

archaeal

 

domain

Diversity

 

of

 

bacterial

 

and

 

archaeal

 

domain

Diversity

 

of

 

bacterial

 

and

 

archaeal

 

domain

Diversity

 

of

 

bacterial

 

and

 

archaeal

 

domain

0 10 20 30

Alphap rote

obac teria

Betapr oteob

OTUs number

Major group of  Major group of BacteriaBacteria  ::

1.

1. BacteroidetesBacteroidetes 2.

2. FirmicutesFirmicutes 3. 3. ChloroflexiChloroflexi 4.

4. ProteobacteriaProteobacteria

0 5 10 rillum Meth

ano

OTUs number

Major group of  Major group of ArchaeaArchaea  ::

1.

1. MethanosaetaMethanosaeta 2.

2. MethanospirillumMethanospirillum 3.

3. MethanoculleusMethanoculleus

32

Desulfotomaculumthermoacetoxidans Pelotomaculumthermopropionicum

EADS18 (1/521) EADS19 (1/521)

Thermoanaerobacteriumsp. EADS20 (2/521)

Thermoanaerobactermathranii

Uncultured bacterium SJA-143

Clostridium quercicolum

Uncultured bacterium SJA-112 MADS8 (1/133) Uncultured bacterium AA01 EADS21 (5/521) EADS22 (4/521)

EADS23 (4/521) MADS9 (2/133)

Syntrophomonassapovorans Syntrophomonasflectens

EADS24 (4/521) EADS25 (7/521)

Syntrophomonassp. MGB-C1 EADS26 (4/521) 74

EADS18 (1/521) EADS19 (1/521)

Thermoanaerobacteriumsp. EADS20 (2/521)

Thermoanaerobactermathranii

Uncultured bacterium SJA-143

Clostridium quercicolum

Uncultured bacterium SJA-112

MADS8 (1/133)

Uncultured bacterium AA01 EADS21 (5/521) EADS22 (4/521)

EADS23 (4/521) MADS9 (2/133)

Syntrophomonassapovorans Syntrophomonasflectens

EADS24 (4/521) EADS25 (7/521)

Syntrophomonassp. MGB-C1 EADS26 (4/521) 74

Syntrophomonassp. sp. ÆÆbutyratebutyrate  oxidationoxidation

Diversity

 

of

 

Firmicutes

 

phylum

Diversity

 

of

 

Firmicutes

 

phylum

Diversity

 

of

 

Firmicutes

 

phylum

Diversity

 

of

 

Firmicutes

 

phylum

EADS26 (4/521) EADS27 (3/521) EADS28 (4/521)

EADS29 (4/521) MADS10 (1/133)

Clostridium lituseburense

EADS30 (4/521)

Clostridium sporosphaeroides

EADS31 (3/521) EADS32 (2/521)

EADS33 (2/521) EADS34(3/521)

Ruminococcusflavefaciens

EADS35 (2/521) EADS36 (2/521) MADS11 (1/133) Uncultured bacterium R6b7

EADS37 (2/521) EADS38 (3/521)

Uncultured bacterium ZZ12C1 EADS39 (2/521)

Clostridium cellobioparum

MADS12 (2/133) EADS40 (6/521)

Clostridium thermocellum

EADS41 (5/521)

Clostridium sp. JC3 EADS42 (5/521) 100

EADS26 (4/521) EADS27 (3/521) EADS28 (4/521)

EADS29 (4/521) MADS10 (1/133) Clostridium lituseburense

EADS30 (4/521)

Clostridium sporosphaeroides

EADS31 (3/521) EADS32 (2/521)

EADS33 (2/521) EADS34(3/521)

Ruminococcusflavefaciens

EADS35 (2/521) EADS36 (2/521) MADS11 (1/133)

Uncultured bacterium R6b7 EADS37 (2/521) EADS38 (3/521)

Uncultured bacterium ZZ12C1 EADS39 (2/521)

Clostridium cellobioparum MADS12 (2/133) EADS40 (6/521)

Clostridium thermocellum

EADS41 (5/521)

Clostridium sp. JC3 EADS42 (5/521) 100

Clostridiagroup group ÆÆto be responsible in to be responsible in 

cellulose & sugar  fermentation cellulose & sugar  fermentationdowns to downs to  fatty acids 

ndance (%

)

u

ndance (%

) GlucoseGlucose

Propionate

Abundances

 

vs

 

specific

 

rates

Abundances

 

vs

 

specific

 

rates

Abundances

 

vs

 

specific

 

rates

Abundances

 

vs

 

specific

 

rates

Ab

u

Ab

u PropionatePropionate

Acetate

Specific Rate (

Specific Rate (x 10x 10--44mol gmol g--VSSVSS--1 1 hh--11))

1.4

Propionate oxidation

Propionate oxidation is is “bottle neck”“bottle neck”

Limiting factor

Limiting factorin anaerobic degradationin anaerobic degradation Glc

Glc : : PropProp: : AceAce

= =1212: : 11::22

37

•• TheThe phylogenyphylogeny analysisanalysis basedbased onon 1616SS rRNArRNA cloningcloning analysisanalysis elucidated

elucidated thatthat thethe substratesubstrate simplificationsimplification willwill simplifiedsimplified thethe structure

structure ofof thethe anaerobicanaerobic microbialmicrobial communitycommunity inin termterm ofof species

species oror genusgenus levellevelbutbut notnot phylaphyla oror groupgroup level,level, allowedallowed more

more effectiveeffective utilizationutilizationofof perturbedperturbed substratesubstrate..

Conclusions

Conclusions

Conclusions

Conclusions

•• DueDue toto itsits lowlow abundanceabundance andand degradationdegradation rate,rate, propionate propionate--oxidizing

oxidizing bacteriabacteriawerewere expressedexpressed toto bebe aalimitinglimiting factorfactorinin ADAD processes

processes..

(7)

Phylogenetic and Functional Diversity of Propionate

Phylogenetic and Functional Diversity of

Propionate--Oxidizing Bacteria (POB) in an Anaerobic

Oxidizing Bacteria (POB) in an Anaerobic

Digester Sludge

Digester Sludge

(Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2007, doi:10.1007/s002530070842y)

Chapter

Chapter

4

4

Chapter

Chapter

4

4

Discussion Topics : Discussion Topics :

1.

1. community structure of community structure of activeactivePOB population under different POB population under different propionate concentrations

propionate concentrations

2.

2. comprehensive comprehensive identification of active POBidentification of active POBto explore their to explore their phylogeny identity

phylogeny identity

39

-- Smithella propionicaSmithella propionica

--Syntrophobacter fumaroxidansSyntrophobacter fumaroxidans

Under Methanogenic Condition :

Acetate organic sludge organic sludge

CH

Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans

--Syntrophobacter pfennigiiSyntrophobacter pfennigii

--Syntrophobacter woliniiSyntrophobacter wolinii

--Syntrophobacter sulfatireducensSyntrophobacter sulfatireducens

--Pelotomaculum schinkiiPelotomaculum schinkii

Diversity, abundance, and

Diversity, abundance, and in situin situactivity activity of these bacteria group of these bacteria group have

haveNOTNOTbeen demonstrated yetbeen demonstrated yet

40

• the effect of propionate concentration on the active

community composition of POB

To investigate, identify, characterize :

• the community structure (abundance&diversity) of POB

The

 

objectives

The

 

objectives

The

 

objectives

The

 

objectives

By application of : By application of :

rRNA cloning analysis,

rRNA cloning analysis, MARMAR--FISHFISHÆÆcommunity structurecommunity structure Micromanipulation

Micromanipulation ÆÆphylogeny identification of active POBphylogeny identification of active POB

41

Milk Added Anaerobic Milk Added Anaerobic H

Ebetsu City Anaerobic Ebetsu City Anaerobic Digester Plant Sludge Digester Plant Sludge

--Semi Batch Feeding Semi Batch Feeding

Operation Condition Operation Condition

Methodology

Methodology

Methodology

Methodology

Phylogenetic Phylogenetic Analysis Analysis

Milk Added Anaerobic Milk Added Anaerobic

Digester Sludge Digester Sludge

MAR

MAR--DAPI analysisDAPI analysis MAR

MAR--FISH analysisFISH analysis

Micro Micro--manipulation manipulation

Active MAR- positive POB cells

Digester Digester Performance Performance Digester Digester Performance Performance

Universal Bacteria

primer sets

POB-specific FISH probes.

[14C]propionate.

• •FAFA  concentrationconcentration

• •GasGas  compositioncomposition

CC  contentcontent  (as(as  COD)COD)

• •SolidSolid  contentcontent

42

Feeding substrate (milk) Feeding substrate (milk)

Fate

 

of

 

fatty

 

acids

 

during

 

AD

 

operation

Lactate Formate

0

Lactate Formate

‐‐[Sulfate] [Sulfate] ≈≈0.01 mM0.01 mM ‐‐HH22partial pressure < 10partial pressure < 10‐‐44atmatm ‐‐[CH[CH44] = 60] = 60‐‐65 mol%65 mol%

‐‐[CO[CO22] = 35] = 35‐‐40 mol%40 mol% 43

alkanes -degrading methanogenic consortium clone B2 (AJ133795) alkanes -degrading methanogenic consortium clone B1 (AJ133794)

OTU 1 (2 clones) OTU 74 (1 clones)

anaerobic trichlorobenzene consortium clone SJA -63 (AJ009471) contaminated aquifer clone WCHB1 -12 (AF050534)

OTU 13 (8 clones)

municipal anaerobic digester clone (CR933198)

Smithella propionica(AF126282) granular sludge clone (AF482441)

alkanes -degrading methanogenic consortium clone B3 (AJ133796) landfill leachate clone (AJ853548)

Micromanipulated long rod bacterium clone

alkanes -degrading methanogenic consortium clone B2 (AJ133795) alkanes -degrading methanogenic consortium clone B1 (AJ133794)

OTU 1 (2 clones) OTU 74 (1 clones)

anaerobic trichlorobenzene consortium clone SJA -63 (AJ009471) contaminated aquifer clone WCHB1 -12 (AF050534)

OTU 13 (8 clones)

municipal anaerobic digester clone (CR933198)

Smithella propionica Smithella propionica(AF126282)(AF126282)

granular sludge clone (AF482441)

alkanes -degrading methanogenic consortium clone B3 (AJ133796) landfill leachate clone (AJ853548)

Micromanipulated

Micromanipulated long rod bacterium clonelong rod bacterium clone

Propionate Propionate‐‐

Oxidizing 

Oxidizing 

Bacteria Bacteria

Diversity

 

of

 

propionate

Diversity

 

of

 

propionate

‐‐

oxidizing

oxidizing

 

 

bacteria

bacteria

 

 

group

group

Diversity

 

of

 

propionate

Diversity

 

of

 

propionate

‐‐

oxidizing

oxidizing

 

 

bacteria

bacteria

 

 

group

group

0.02

OTU 14 (2 clones)

terephthalate degrading anaerobic hybrid reactor clone TTA H101 (AY661418)

Syntrophus gentianae(X85132)

OTU 11 (1 clones)

Syntrophobacter wolinii(X70906)

Pelotomaculum thermopropionicum(AB035723)

Pelotomaculum schinkii(X91169)

Desulfotomaculum thermobenzoicum(Y11574)

Syntrophobotulus glycolicus(X99706)

Syntrophothermus lipocalidus(AB021305)

OTU 18 (1 clones)

Syntrophomonas sapovorans(AF022249)

Syntrophomonas sp. TB-6 (AB098336)

Syntrophomonas wolfei (AF022248)

Syntrophospora bryantii(M26491)

Syntrophomonas sp. MGB-C1 (AB021306)

0.02 0.02

OTU 14 (2 clones)

terephthalate degrading anaerobic hybrid reactor clone TTA H101 (AY661418)

Syntrophus gentianae(X85132)

OTU 11 (1 clones)

Syntrophobacter Syntrophobacter woliniiwolinii(X70906)(X70906) Pelotomaculum thermopropionicum(AB035723)

Pelotomaculum schinkii(X91169)

Desulfotomaculum thermobenzoicum(Y11574)

Syntrophobotulus glycolicus(X99706)

Syntrophothermus lipocalidus(AB021305)

OTU 18 (1 clones)

Syntrophomonas sapovorans(AF022249)

Syntrophomonas sp. TB-6 (AB098336)

Syntrophomonas wolfei (AF022248)

Syntrophospora bryantii(M26491)

Syntrophomonas sp. MGB-C1 (AB021306)

Butyrate Butyrate‐‐ Oxidizing  Oxidizing  Bacteria Bacteria

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

rows in the field, so we’ll calculate the total amount of fuel the turtle needs to sweep the entire field as length * width. In addition, the turtle needs enough fuel to move back

Forty percent of all Americans say that people who download music off the Internet aren’t doing anything wrong, 35% say downloaders are stealing, and 25% don’t take a position..

Gambar/ sampul (cover) belakang menyesuaikan gambar sampul depan. Terdapat tulisan kesan warga desa pada kelompok KKN. Tulisannya diambil dari epilog yang sudah pilih dan hanya

Kombinasi yang paling baik ditemukan pada perlakuan perendaman dengan tingkat kematangan kuning pada alur dan punggung buah (A2B1) pada proses perkecambahan dan

Ada beberapa manfaat jika metode para sufi yaitu metode irfani’ diamalkan dalam kehidupan sehari-hari terutama dekat dengan Allah Swt sehingga kita bisa hidup

29 Maklumat berikut merujuk kepada amaran yang dikeluarkan dalam menghalang penglibatan rakyat dalam gerakan anti penyerahan di Sarawak. Apakah kesan daripada pengeluaran

Analisis data menggunakan analisis interaktif.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tercapainya peningkatan nilai pemahaman kosakata Bahasa Jawa siswa kelas VB SD Negeri Madegondo 01

[r]