SATUAN KERJA KHUSUS PELAKSANA KEGIATAN U

SATUAN KERJA KHUSUS

PELAKSANA KEGIATAN USAHA HULU MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI

(SKK Migas)

SATUAN KERJA KHUSUS

PELAKSANA KEGIATAN USAHA HULU MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI

(SKK Migas)

- A temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product,

service, or result. (PMBOK)

- A temporary organization that is created for the purpose of

delivering one or more business product according to an agreed

Business Case. (PRINCE2)

A finite endeavor having specific start and completion dates

-undertaken to meet particular goals and objectives, usually to

brings about beneficial change or added value. (wikipedia)

THE THREE PROJECT INTERESTS

SKK Migas

Untuk

mendukung

proses

pengambilan keputusan

secara sistematik dan terukur apakah kegiatan kegiatan

Proyek dapat dilanjutkan ke tahapan berikutnya, atau

harus

dilakukan

peninjauan

ulang,

atau

Proyek

Feasibility Study

Conceptual

Study

Design

Engineering

Construction /

EPCI

Operation

none

Studi Konseptual

(Pra-POD)

FEED

Konstruksi

(EPCI)

Tahapan Proyek

Appraise

Select

Define

Execute

Operate

Execute

Operate

Identify & Assess Opportunity

Phase-2

Generate & Select Alternative(s)

Phase-3

Develop Preferred Alternative

Phase-4

Execute

Phase-5

Operate & Evaluate

Appraisal Design

Pre-Project

Basic Engineering

EPSC

Comm &

StartUp

Operations

FEED

Konstruksi

OPERASI

Key Criteria for Distinctive Investment Performance

Operational

Excellence

APPRAISE

SELECT

DEFINE

EXECUTE

OPERATE

*

Choose the Right Project

Develop the

_{Project Right}

Deliver the Project Right

Risked Portfolio

Management

Excellence in Project

Management

FEED

Konstruksi

OPERASI

Konseptual

Influence vs Cost

Source: Eka Satria, bp, FKT 2005

Eng Progress vs Cost Estimate

6 (Six) Key Project Performance :

1. QUALITY

2. COST

3. SCOPE

4. TIME / SCHEDULE

5. RISK

Plan of Development (POD)

Buku POD terdiri dari :

BAB 1

Executive Summary

BAB 2

Geological Findings and Reviews

BAB 3

Reservoir Descriptions

BAB 4

Reserve & Production Forecast

BAB 5

Drilling & Completion

BAB 6

Production Facilities

BAB 7

Field Development Scenario

BAB 8

Health Safety and Environment & Corporate Social Responsibility

BAB 9

Abandonment & Site Restoration Plan

BAB 10

Project Schedule & Organization

BAB 11

Local Content

BAB 12

Commercial

BAB 13

Conclusion

MA

R

K

E

T

Overall Development

Scenario

Contoh: Studi PRE-POD

•

Pre POD

adalah kegiatan studi konseptual untuk menggali dan

mempertimbang-kan :

–

berbagai skenario pengurasan

–

lokasi dan metoda pengeboran sumur produksi

–

konfigurasi dan jenis Fasilitas Produksi, disesuaikan dengan perkiraan jumlah & jenis cadangan

–

Hasil analisa pasar

–

termasuk di dalam aktivitas

Pre

-

POD

adalah kegiatan survei

seismic

, studi

GGR

, pengeboran, dan

survei lokasi (geoteknik dan geofisika),

•

Pre-FEED

adalah kegiatan Proyek Fasilitas Produksi pada tahap studi konseptual

dimana dilakukan :

–

proses identifikasi dan seleksi konsep, jenis, dan konfigurasi Fasilitas Produksi yang paling sesuai

–

Pada tahap ini juga dilakukan kegiatan awal survei lokasi (geoteknikal dan geofisikal) untuk

mendapatkan gambaran umum karakteristik pada wilayah kerja yang akan dikembangkan.

•

Kegiatan ini diutamakan untuk mendapatkan pilihan konsep pengembangan

lapangan yang akan tertuang di dalam dokumen

Plan of Development

(

POD

),

suatu dokumen tentang rencana jangka panjang pengembangan suatu lapangan.

PRE-FEED SAMPLE

Relative location to existing and new facilities

New Field / New KKKS

KKKS-1

Plant-1 onshore

–

72 Km

KKKS-2

Plant-2 FPU export line

–

16 Km (future)

Plant-3 treatment plant

–

70 Km

KKKS-3

Plant-4 Terminal

–

69 Km

Plant-5 offshore

–

43 Km

Plant-6 offshore

–

41 Km

Plant-7

–

39 Km

Plant-8

–

80 Km



Water Depth: 400 - 500 m

XYZ FIELD

Lapangan XYZ Gas Sample Composition

Screening Methodology

Concept Screening Methodology

FPU

3 wells

–

250 MMSCFD

Vertical type Cluster type

None Minim.Off. Treatment

Full Off. Treat.

None -Subsea tie-back

SWP SWP FPU

New

Use of Existing Infrastructure

XYZ 3 wells - Gas production range [250 MMSCFD]

Project Location vs Existing Infrastructure

Offshore Existing Infrastructure

Total Site Visit - Objectives

•

Mahakam North Area Facilities (Nubi

Complex)

•

Peciko Offshore Facilities

•

Senipah Facilities

•

Sapi Facilities

•

New Area near Senipah

PLANT-5

LAP XYZ

PLANT-6 PLANT-8

43 Km

39 Km

41 Km

80 Km

Main Findings from Evaluation Study

Plant-5 Offshore Facilities

–

NOT RECOMMENDED

•

Study to tie-in future production from other KKKS (100 MMScfd) or existing (250 MMscfd)

fields into Plan-5 concluded that it is not recommended due to major back pressure with high

impact on current production.

•

Seven wellhead unmanned platforms + 1 future currently operated at low pressure (12-15

bar) to try to maximize production.

•

Production is sent to Plant-4 Terminal in multiphase via 4X24

”

pipelines.

•

For these reasons, other KKKS and existing production will be sent directly on-shore to

Plant-4 via a dedicated sea-line.

Plant-6 Offshore Facilities

–

NOT RECOMMENDED

•

Only 1X26

”

trunk line going to the on-shore compression facilities from existing off-shore

field.

•

Possible backpressure and Production Losses

•

Several wells and three compression stations operated by KKKS-3.

•

Compression capacity fully booked for existing fields

Plant-7 Offshore Facilities

–

NOT RECOMMENDED

•

Oil field

•

Old facilities (1974) / Possible integrity issues

•

No Spare Capacity (design capacity 18 MMSCFD)

•

System Working at Low Pressure

Plant-8 Offshore Facilities

–

NOT RECOMMENDED

•

Oil field

•

No Spare Capacity (design capacity 200 MMSCFD)

•

System Working at Low Pressure

Total Site Visit - Objectives

•

Mahakam North Area Facilities (Nubi

Complex)

•

Peciko Offshore Facilities

•

Senipah Facilities

•

Sapi Facilities

•

New Area near Senipah

69 Km

70 Km + 10 km onshore

PLANT-1

PLANT-4

PLANT-8

PLANT-5

PLANT-7

PLANT-6

Plant-1 Onshore Facilities

–

NOT RECOMMENDED

•

No Spare Capacity (design capacity 150 MMSCFD)

•

System Working at Low Pressure

Plant-4 Onshore Facilities :

Base on study of Plant-4 Terminal

–

Overview, Plant-4 - Process Area,

Plant-4 Terminal

–

Production Profile & Spare Capacities,

Subsea

tie-back to Plant-4 Facilities is possible

with the following limitation :



Spare capacity will be available in 2016



Spare capacity available only on HP System (870 Psig) otherwise

Compression will be needed



Utilities System to be fully assessed (electrical power available, while water,

air instrument, control room, MCC building, civil works for new equipments to

be assessed)

However, a cost-benefit analysis is to be performed to fully assess this

option.

XYZ 3 wells - Gas production range [250 MMSCFD]

Plant-5 complex

Wellhead Platforms Trunkline cap 685 MMscfd (@HP) & 370 MMscfd (@MP) Spare gas capacity Major back pressure & production losses

Plant-6 complex

Gas capacity 200 mmscfd No spare gas cap

Potential Backpressure & production losses

Plant-4 complex

HP Gas cap. 3 x 350 MMSCFD Spare HP gas cap.

400 mmscfd from 2016

Plant-1 complex

Gas capacity 150 mmscfd Spare gas cap. 25 mmscfd

Plant-12 complex

Gas cap. 700 mmscfd No spare gas cap Available in Q3/2016

Plant-8 complex

Gas capacity 200 mmscfd No spare gas cap.

Works in LP system

40 km

Gas capacity 18 mmscfd No Spare gas capacity

Project Location vs Existing Infrastructure Options

Offshore Processing

Option 1 : No Offshore Treatment

Subsea tie-back to shore : NOT RECOMMENDED



Lower gas recovery caused by higher abandonment reservoir pressure



Potential Flow assurance issues due to multiphase transport (i.e hydrate management, slug volumes,

etc.)



Less reliability of the system



System productivity dependent on less efficient well



Expandability issues



Dependance on other Operator existing facilities



Technical Challenges due to long distance from shore (long control umbilical)

58

Main findings from evaluation study

Option 2 : Minimum Offshore Treatment

: separation and compression

Option 3 : Full Offshore Treatment

: separation, compression,

dehydration, condensate stabilization, hydrate inhibition

Minimum offshore process: NOT RECOMMENDED



The minimum offshore treatment is not economically competitive with

respect to the full offshore treatment



The minimum offshore treatment requires both offshore and onshore

processing facilities, thus increasing related operational and safety issues

(two processing facilities to be managed)

Offshore Structure

Offshore Platform Types

Larger lake- and sea-based offshore platforms and drilling rigs are some of the largest

moveable man-made structures in the world. There are several types of oil platforms

and rigs:

TLP

:

NOT RECOMMENDED



Not cost effective due to a low number of surface wells reachable

from TLP



Long time to market



Low expansion capacity (mini-TLP)

Concepts still to be evaluated

FPU 5 wells –300 MMSCFD

Vertical type Cluster type

Minim.Off. Treatment

Full Off. Treat.

SWP SWP FPU

New

Development Scenarios

•

Results of the pre-feasibility study and of the peer reviews recommended to

further evaluate in the

concept selection

phase the following main

development scenarios:

–

Shallow Water Platform

(in about 120 m water depth) with full offshore

treatment and export to an existing onshore pipeline

–

FPU

in about 300-500 m water depth with full offshore treatment and

Options under evaluation: Shallow water platform (SWP)

70 km

XYZ Field

To Customer

Shallow Water

Platform (120m wd)

Existing plant (onshore / offshore) multiphase

Subsea development

LEGEND

Treated gas

Full treatment unit (FPU or Platform) Existing pipeline

New onshore plant



Stand alone SWP



Gas pipeline to Existing pipeline

network

•

Subsea Production System

(Wellhead, Flowline, Manifold,

Umbilical)

•

Processing Facilities (Receiving &

Separation, Gas compression &

treatment, Condensate Treatment,

Gas & Condensate Transfer, Utility)

Options under evaluation: Floating Production Unit (FPU)

70 km

XYZ Field

To Customer

Existing plant (onshore / offshore) multiphase

Subsea development

LEGEND

Treated gas

Full treatment unit (FPU or Platform) Existing pipeline

New onshore plant



Stand alone FPU



Gas pipeline to Existing pipeline

network

•

Subsea Production System

(Wellhead, Flowline, Manifold,

Umbilical)

•

Processing Facilities (Receiving &

Separation, Gas compression &

treatment, Condensate Treatment,

Gas & Condensate Transfer, Utility)

FPU

(about 300 m WD)

Development options preliminary comparison

Characteristic SWP FPU

Flowline system Longer infield flowline system

Subsea layout less exposed to geohazards

•More complex riser system (need of dynamic sections for risers and umbilicals)

Expandability •Larger deck area and load capacity permit easier expansion;

•Allows storage of liquids

HSE •Risks for personnel working offshore for long periods during hook up and commissioning activities (moreover possible SIMOPs)

•SSIV system less effective (long distance from FPU)

•Flexible risers less protected from ship impact than SWP risers

Subsea system •Complex riser base for export line due to

diameter limit on flexible riser (16” ID)

Decommissioning Requires heavy decommissioning activities •Residual value

Contractual scheme •Leasing scheme possible

Schedule In case of modular deck system, this requires long hook up and commissioning activities

Operability/ piggability •Pigging of export line requires support vessel and subsea pig launcher because of complex riser base

Constructability •Possible availability of existing FPU for reconversion

Total Site Visit - Objectives

•

Mahakam North Area Facilities (Nubi

Complex)

•

Peciko Offshore Facilities

•

Senipah Facilities

•

Sapi Facilities

•

New Area near Senipah

Shore-1 Approach

–

Preliminary Evaluation

PRO’S

CON’S



No necessity of land acquisition



Low environmental impact (no need

to create a new ROW)



Low populated area



Longer sea-line route

Shore Approach Shore-2

–

Preliminary Evaluation

PRO’S

CON’S



Easy connection directly to 42”

pipeline



No necessity to interface with other

operators for the shore approach

works



Relatively low populated area



Short sea-line route



Necessity of land acquisition



Longer on-shore line route



Higher environmental impact (need

to create a new ROW)



Necessity of off-shore crossing

existing lines

1

Deep vs Shallow Water

Offshore vs Onshore Process

Limited Production Forest

Limited Production Forest

Community PT. Surya Dumai

Industri

PT. Surya Dumai Agrindo

PT. Titian Tata Pelita

PT.

PT. Darma Wungu Guna PT. Arara Abadi

PT. Arara

Contoh Studi Pre-FEED:

Contoh Studi Konseptual

(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )

1.0

Concept Studies

1.1

Pipeline Design Documents

1.2

Top Side Facilities Engineering Document

1.3

Corrosion and Material Studies

1.4

Hydraulic Studies

1.5

Miscellaneous

2.0

Geophysical Survey (Platform Location and Pipeline Route)

3.0

Geotechnical Survey (Platform Location and Pipeline Route)

4.0

Third Party Reports

5.0

Metocean Data

6.0

AMDAL Studies

Contoh Studi Konseptual

(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )

Contoh Studi Konseptual

(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )

Tahapan Rekayasa Desain (

FEED

)

•

Kegiatan pada tahap rekayasa desain (biasa disebut

FEED; Front End Engineering

Design

) adalah kegiatan rekayasa (definition engineering) terhadap Fasilitas

Produksi untuk suatu Proyek tertentu yang disesuaikan dengan rencana jangka

panjang yang tertuang pada dokumen POD :

−

Fit for purpose design

dengan mempertimbangkan Safety, Life Cycle Cost,

Reliability, Availability dan Maintainability

−

Estimasi biaya Konstruksi Proyek

−

Estimasi jadwal pelaksanaan Konstruksi Proyek

−

Strategi Pengadaan, LLI (Long Lead Items), targer TKDN (Tingkat Kandungan

Dalam Negeri)

−

Dokumen Lelang kontraktor Pelaksana EPC

−

Update Risk Register, potensi resiko pelaksanaan EPCI dan rencana

antisipasinya

•

Kegiatan survei lokasi (geoteknik dan geofisika) yang lebih spesifik dapat dilakukan

secara paralel dengan proses evaluasi

POD

, dimana data yang dihasilkan

Contoh Studi FEED

(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )

•

Facilities Optimization (Mainly Process Studies)

•

Facilities Operability Study

•

Pipeline Flow Assurance (Mainly Process Studies)

•

HAZID and Development of Overall Risk Register (Project

Risk/HSE/Process Safety)

•

Operations Philosophy, Operations Reference Plan for field life

(shutdown, maintenance, inspections, etc)

•

Preparation of Project Basis of Design

“tage : P e

-

FEED Opti izatio “tudies a d o espo di g

Contoh Studi FEED

(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )

•

Multidiscipline; Process, Process Safety, Piping/PDMS, Structural/Architecture, Electrical,

Instrumentation, Telecom, Corrosion, Mechanical/Rotating, Procurement, PMT and Cost

Estimation.

•

Assist in preparation of EPCI Tender Documents

•

Preparation of RFQ for LLI, vendor review (max. 5 bids each). COMPANY intends to

procure the Long Lead Items. Orders will be novated to the EPCI CONTRACTOR

•

Liaise with 3

rd

_{party design agency who will verify FEED Package}

•

Constructability Engineering

•

Cost Estimate (+/- (10

–

15) %)

•

Preparation of EPCI Schedule

–

Level 2

•

Safety Design Reviews

•

Provide RFQ for specific materials. Contractor shall consider future expansion with

potential to bring in gas from adjacent field

“tage : The pu pose this do u e t is to o tai a detailed p oposal fo the P e

-FEED Opti izatio “tudies a d -FEED/Basi E gi ee i g fo the platfo s a d

pipeline.

Contoh Studi FEED

(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )

The key deliverables and activities throughout the lifecycle of a

typical / generic FEED project is broken divided into 6 (six) phase :

1. Scope Definition and Engineering Execution Strategy

2. Commencement of FEED Design

3. Initial FEED Development and Hazard Identification

4. Initial Design Review and Audit

5. FEED Design Approval

6. Final Reviews and FEED Report Compilation

Phase 1 : Scope Definition and Engineering Execution Strategy

Preparation for commencement of detail engineering. To evaluate FEED deliverables to ensure

engineering is sufficiently mature for detail design to progress in a controlled and minimal change

environment. To confirm Engineering Execution Plan.

No.

Activities / Deliverables

Description

1

Engineering Execution Plan & Engineering _{Organization Chart} Create Engineering Execution Plan complete with key supporting documents /information.

2

Preparation / Validation of Conceptual Study _{Report / BoD} Confirm maturity of Conceptual Design report, identify any areas of concern and ensure these are _{captured on the Technical Risk Register.}

3

Project Baseline Standard Establish which codes, standards and specifications are to be utilized, e.g. Corporate, project, client, and confirm procedure. Include in Engineering Execution Plan and/or Discipline Job Design Specifications.

4

Engineering Audit Schedule Create formal schedule to identify when technical integrity audits, design reviews, HAZID, HAZOP, etc are to be carried out. Align to Level 3 Engineering Plan and include in Engineering Execution Plan.

5

Technical Risk Register Create formal Technical Risk Register identifying all possible risks associated with the engineering design.

6

Integrated Engineering Systems Agree engineering design tools to be used and confirm that system, hardware, software and support is available, include PDMS, survey methods, dimensional control, techniques, etc.

7

QRA (Quantitative Risk Assessment) & FRA _{(Fire Risk Assessment) Strategy} Establish status of QRA, FRA, and Emergency Escape & Rescue Assessment (EERA) information and _{confirm methodology for timely delivery into engineering design process.}

8

Discipline Job Design Specification

Define the key project specific design parameters and operational constraints that are applicable to the appropriate discipline for the detailed design of the project. To identify key individuals, roles and responsibilities, design tools, key codes and standards, etc.

9

Level 3 Engineering Plan Agree work breakdown structure, develop CTRs and create level 3 integrated engineering plan covering all disciplines. To be included in Engineering Execution Plan.

10

Confirm CE Compliance Strategy Review and confirm strategy for CE Compliance. Ensure discipline Lead Engineers are aware of their responsibilities and appropriate resources / measures are in place.

Phase 2 : Commencement of FEED Design

To formally kick off the Engineering Design Process in accordance with the project execution plan and

ensure that key engineering strategies / philosophies are in place.

No.

Activities / Deliverables

Description

1

Safety Critical Systems / Elements and

Performance Standards

Confirm safety critical systems / elements and set appropriate performance standards, i.e. functionality, reliability and survivability.

2

Document Distribution Matrix Create formal documents distribution matrix to ensure all disciplines & departments receive all necessary design information in a timely manner.

3

Structure Integrity Interface Ensure structural integrity interfaces are identified & visible to project, e.g. Technical Authorities, Independent Verification Bodies, etc.

4

Material Selection Report Report defining the requirements and specifications of necessary material.

5

Hazard Management Plan Create Hazard Management Plan identifying all key hazards, technical safety activities and the approach to managing Major Accident Hazards in the design.

6

Piping Specifications Develop / confirm baseline piping specifications.

7

PDMS Catalogues Ensure PDMS catalogues are populated and available for all affected discipline.

Phase 3 : Initial Design Development and Hazard Identification

To develop initial design deliverables to Inter Discipline Review (IDC) stage and identify key hazard

No.

Activities /

Deliverables

Description

Key

Discipline

1

HAZID Perform hazard identification studies, as identified on Engineering Audit Schedule / Technical Safety Events Schedule.

Technical Safety

2

Environmental

Impact Identification

Formal assessment of environmental aspects associated with a modification or a change, and to propose prevention or mitigating measures.

Technical Safety

3

PFD IDC Issue P o ess Flo Diag a s PFD s o fo al I te -Discipline Review (IDC). Process

4

Shutdown & Blowdown Philosophy

Explains the measures to shutdown safely and control blowdown and how this will be

achieved. Process

5

P&ID s IDC Issue Piping & InstrumentationDiag a P&ID s o fo al Inter-Discipline Review

(IDC). Process

6

Plot Plans / Layouts

IDC Issue equipment Plot Plans / Layouts on formal Inter-Discipline Review (IDC).

Piping & Layouts

7

HIPPS Review Initial review to establish requirements for a High Integrity Pressure Protection

System Instruments

8

Dropped Object

Study

Identify and assess the potential risks to drilling, production, process equipment, and manned areas from dropped or swinging objects. Where the consequence of a dropped object is considered significant, to propose prevention/mitigating measures.

Technical Safety

9

Mechanical Handling

Strategy

Develop Mechanical Handling Strategy including general approach / constraints, platform crane limits, installation philosophy, operation and maintenance, etc.

Phase 3 : Initial Design Development and Hazard Identification

(continued)

No.

Activities /

Deliverables

Description

Key

Discipline

10

Particular Material _{Appraisal (PMA)} Where required,i.e. he e Co po ate PMA s a e ot suita le, de elop e PMA s. PED Focal Point

11

Cause & Effects IDC Issue Cause & Effects for formal Inter-Discipline Review (IDC). Process and

Instruments

12

Hazardous Area Layouts _IDC Issue Hazardous Area Layouts for formal Inter-Discipline Review (IDC). Technical Safety

13

Fire Risk Assessment _(FRA) Determine Fire & Explosion scenarios and identifies requirements for prevention, control and _{mitigation measures.} Technical Safety

14

Blast Design Philosophy Develop philosophy that assesses potential explosion hazards and identifies appropriate blast loadings

to be applied to the engineering design process, e.g. Vessels, pipe supports, structural steel, etc. Technical Safety

15

TR Impairment Study Assessment of the vulnerability of a Temporary Refuge and demonstration of its capability to sustain

life for a specified duration when under attack by fire, explosion and toxic gases. Technical Safety

16

Equipment List & Data _Sheets

Create master project equipment list identifying all major items of tagged equipment, e.g. vessels, pumps, motors, generators, hydrocyclones, chemical injection packages, electrical switichgear, control panels, etc.

Mechanical

17

Emergency Escape & Rescue Assessment (EERA)

To identify requirements for emergency escape & rescue, e.g. lifeboats, escape routes, plant layout, etc.

Technical Safety

18

PFP / AFP Philosophy Develop philosophy that identifies requirements for Passive Fire Protection (PFP) and/or Active Fire

Protection (AFP) Technical Safety

19

Power System Analysis Check power system capacities for increase power requirements for new equipment (Brownfiled). Electrical

Phase 4 : Initial Design Review and Audit

To confirm that the initial design development is robust

No.

Activities /

Deliverables

Description

Key

Discipline

1

Hazardous Area

Review

Formal Engineering discipline review of hazardous area layouts to confirm

requirements for the correct selection and location of equipment. Technical Safety

2

P&ID Review Fo al E gi ee i g dis ipli e e ie of P&ID s to o fi desig asis.

Process, Piping, Technical Safety,

Instruments

3

Plot Plan / Layout /

3-D Model Review

Formal Engineering review of Plot plans / Layouts. The review shall ensure that the layout design complies with the required technical, safety, operability and

maintainability standards. Makes sure the layout is cost effective, ensures the

constructability of the work and agrees the layout basis on which the detailed design can proceed.

Piping and Layouts, Structural, Mechanical,

Electrical, Technical Safety,

Process

4

Cause & Effect

review

Formal review of Cause & Effects diagrams to confirm design basis and alignment with Hazard Management Plan.

Instruments, Process, Technical Safety

5

Technical Audit Obtain confirmation, by sampling of project documentation, that the engineering of

Phase 5 : FEED Design Approval

To F eeze the P o ess desig , a d de elop depe de t desig & p o u e e t a ti ities

No.

Activities /

Deliverables

Description

Key

Discipline

1

Final Design review Demonstration that all of the design and review activities relevant to achieving design integrity have _{been performed.} Technical Safety

2

PUWER Assessments Conduct initial PUWER (Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations) assessment typically by _{review of PDMS model and/or vendor / equipment supplier information received to date.} Technical Safety, _Mechanical

3

HAZOP Hazard and Operability Studies, a systemic multi-discipline study based on the applications of _{guidewords to identify causes of potential hazards and operability constraints in a facility.} Process, Technical _Safety

4

Best Available Techniques (BAT) Report

The Final report which analyses the major environmental issues that have been considered as part of the process to select the final option from the various alternatives considered. Thus preventing, or eliminating, or where the alternatives are not practicable, to then limit or reduce environmental impacts associated with the selected option.

Technical Safety

5

Constructability

Review Conduct formal Constructability Reviews to ensure safe and efficient installation of plant & equipment.

Affected disciplines + Construction / Implementation

Group

6

P&ID AFD Issue Approved For Design (AFD) Process and Instrumentation Diagrams. Process

7

Cause & Effects AFD Issue Approved For Design (AFD) Cause & Effects Instruments

8

Process Data Sheets

AFD Issue Approved For Design (AFD) Process Data Sheets Process

9

HP / LP Interface

Listing

Identify all HP / LP Interface on formal register and ensure that all have been addressed satisfactorily

via HAZOP and/or individual reviews. Process

Phase 5 : FEED Design Approval (continued)

No.

Activities /

Deliverables

Description

Key

Discipline

11

SIL Assessment

Conduct assessment to determine target Safety Integrity Level (SIL). Note : Where the target SIL is 3, then it is likely that a High Integrity Pressure Protection Systems

(HIPPS) will be required. If the value is found to be 1 or 2, then a HIPPS will not be required.

Instruments

12

HIPPS Study

Conduct study to formally identify the performance requirements of the High Integrity Pressure Protection Systems (HIPPS) and demonstrate that it is robust. Should include dynamic study for a range of transient conditions.

Process

13

Qualitative Risk

Assessment (QRA)

Multi-disciplinary study of hazards, the likelihood of their occurrence and potential consequences in terms of harm to people and the environment.

Technical Safety

14

HIPPS Reliability

Study

Conduct study to formally demonstrate that the High Integrity Pressure Protection Systems (HIPPS) complies with the reliability & availability criteria for the Project, e.g. as stipulated in the performance standard.

Instruments

15

Flow Assurance Conduct flow assurance studies to demonstrate the process design under a range of

flow condition, i.e. start-up to 100% Process

16

EDAS (Engineering Delivery Assurance System) Stage Gate Reviews

Demonstrate adherence to the EDAS Task Performance Criteria appropriate for Project Category

Engineering Manager

17

Technical Peer

Review

Demonstrate adherence to the EDAS Task Performance Criteria appropriate for the Project Category and to ensure that engineering personnel are aware of EDAS requirements and adequately explain how those requirements are being fulfilled.

Phase 6 : Final Reviews and FEED Report Compilation

To ensure all final design deliverables are completed and that client and statutory obligations are

satisfactorily resolved.

No.

Activities /

Deliverables

Description

Key

Discipline

1

FEED Report

Collate all disciplines inputs and finalize study report

Project

Management

Contoh Studi FEED

(kontrak dengan Engineering Company )

Contoh Studi FEED

Contoh Studi FEED

Contoh Studi FEED

Contoh Studi FEED

Contoh Studi FEED

Contoh Studi FEED

Contracting Strategy

–

Sample

Jackets Topsides Pipelines

Management, Project Definition, Contract Preparation

Survey

Basic Engineering

Detail Engineering

Procurement / Supply

Construction

Pre-Commissioning

Tie-ins & Modification to existing platform

Transportation & Installation

Hook Up

Commissioning

Start-Up

EPC1 EPC3

COMPANY COMMISSIONING TEAM / CONTRACTORS & Supplier Assistance

COMPANY START-UP TEAM

EPC4

EPC2 XYZ DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

PT. SURVEY CONTRACTOR

PT. ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR) COMPANY

PO 003 PRESSURE VESSEL - SS

PO 002 VALVES PO 001

STRUCTURAL STEEL

PO - Scope of Work

PO 001

–

Structural Steel

PO 002 - Valves

Supply of:

 Tubular cans with various diameters from 26” to 68.5” with various thicknesses from 1.0” to 2.0”

 Rolled and welded tubular with various diameters from 10.750” to 66” with various thicknesses from 0.375” to 1.0”

 Plates with various thicknesses from 12 mm to 50 mm

 Rolled structural shapes Material designation:

 For tubular cans: API 2H

 Rolled and welded tubular: API 5L

 Plates: A36

 Rolled structural shapes: API 2B

Supply of:

 Manual Ball VALVES, Butterfly VALVES, Globe VALVES and

Check VALVES from 6” up to 20” size, Rating 150#, 600# and 900#

 Actuated VALVES from 6” up to 20” size, Rating 150#, 600# and

900#

Design codes ASME, Body material: Duplex Stainless Steel UNS S31803 and Carbon steel.

PO 003

–

Press. Vessel SS

PO 004

–

Press. Vessel CS

Supply of:

 One (1) Test Separator, Carbon Steel material with Stainless Steel Clad, fitted with internals

 Three (3) Vent KO Drums, Stainless Steel material, fitted with internals

Supply of:

 Three (3) Close Drain Drums, Carbon Steel material, internally coated, cathodic protection installed inside

EPC1 - Jackets EPC2 - Topsides EPC3 - Pipelines EPC4 - Transportation and Installation 2(two) tripod WHP and 1 (one)

four legs CPP jackets and appurtenance.

Each tripod jacket weight approx. 800 Metric tons and four legs jacket weight approx. 1250 Metric tons.

2 (two) integrated topsides for WHP and 1 (one) CPP

WHP Topsides each weighs approx. 750 Metric tons and CPP topside weight approx.. 1350 Metric tons plus modifications to existing platforms facilities.

Pipelines:

- 6 pipeli e app o . 6k - 1 x 16 pipeli e (approx. 8km) - pipeline (approx. 4km)

Transportation and installation of 2 (two) integrated topsides for WHP and 1 (one) CPP.

Water depth ranging from 50m to 75m.

 Detailed engineering, site survey and interface management.

 Main structural steel free issued by COMPANY.

 Procurement of all the remaining steel, anodes, piles, conductor pipes.

 Construction of the two (2) tripod jackets and one (1) four leg jacket.

 Load out and sea fastening of the three (3) jackets and associated piles and conductor pipes

 Detailed engineering, site survey and interface management.

 Main structural steel free issued by COMPANY.

 Ma ual a d a tuated al es a o e 6 f ee

issued by COMPANY.

 Procurement and supply of the main components of the topsides and the entire equipment for the telecommunication system.

 Construction and pre-commissioning of the three (3) topsides and of the entire

telecommunication system.

 Load out and sea fastening of the three (3) topsides

 Mobilization of Marine Spread(s) for hook up

 HOOK up following installation of topsides by EPC4.

 Assistance to COMPANY during commissioning and start-up.

 Tie-ins and modifications works to the existing platforms facilities, including telemetry, control, safety systems and by pass line.

 Detailed engineering, site survey and interface management.

 Procurement of all materials including line pipes, anodes, and coating materials.

 Coating and transportation of line pipe.

 Mobilization/demobilization of marine spread(s).

 I stallatio of 6 a d

pipeline.

 Diving works for all subsea installations and connections.

 Pre-commissioning of the entire pipeline network.

 Detailed engineering and interface management.

 Mobilization/demobilization of marine spread(s).

 Transportation of the jackets, topsides, vent booms and telecom masts and appurtenance to the offshore location.

 Installation of the jackets, topsides, vent booms, and telecom masts and appurtenance.

EPC Potential Bidder

Potential Bidder for Jackets and Topsides:

•

McDermot (Batam Yard)

•

SMOE (Batam Yard)

•

Nisconi (Batam Yard)

•

Saipem (Karimun Yard)

•

Gunanusa (West Java Yard)

•

Bakrie Construction (West Java Yard)

•

Meindo (Handil Yard)

•

Etc.

Potential Bidder for Transportation and Installation:

No. Barge Name Scope Owner

Tender Schedule

PO _AnnouncementIssue Media _{Prequalification}Start Issue CFT to

Qualified Tenderers

Stage 1

EPSC _AnnouncementIssue Media _{Prequalification}Start Issue CFT to

EPCI

•

Kegiatan pada tahap Konstruksi adalah kegiatan pembangunan

Konstruksi fisik dari Fasilitas Produksi.

•

Tahapan ini bisa dilaksanakan secara terintegrasi (biasa disebut

EPC

–

engineering

,

procurement

,

construction

), atau dengan beberapa

Kontrak Pelaksana.

•

Tahap ini diakhiri dengan kegiatan pengujian,

Commissioning

, dan

Start-up

untuk kemudian diserahterimakan dari penanggung jawab tim

Contractor General Obligation

The Contractor shall design, execute and complete the works in

accordance with the contract and shall remedy any defect in works. When

completed, the works shall be fit for purposes for which the works are

intended as defined in or reasonably to be inferred from the contract

The Co t a to shall p o ide the pla t, ate ials a d Co t a to s

do u e ts spe ified i the o t a a d all Co t a to s pe so el, goods,

consumables and other thing and services, whether of a temporary or

permanent nature, required in and for this design, execution completion

and remedying of defect of damage

The Works shall include any work which is necessary to satisfy the

All other work which (although not mentioned in the contract) is

necessary for stability or for the completion, or safe and proper operation

of the works

The Contractor shall be responsible for the adequacy, stability and safety

of all offsoe site operations of all methods of construction and all the

works

The Contractor shall, whenever required by the company, submit details

of the arrangements and methods which the contractor proposes to

DAFTAR ISI TABLE OF CONTENTS

Dokumen Tandatangan Kontrak Contract Signature Document

1.0 Kontrak 1.0 The Contract

2.0 Pekerjaan 2.0 The Work

3.0 Pemberitahuan 3.0 Notices

4.0 Jangka Waktu dan Pemutusan 4.0 Term and Termination

5.0 Penghentian Sementara Pekerjaan 5.0 Temporary Suspension of the Work

6.0 Kompensasi 6.0 Compensation

7.0 Penagihan dan Pembayaran 7.0 Invoicing and Payment

8.0 Tanggungjawab Kontraktor dan Perusahaan 8.0 Contractor and Company Responsibilities

9.0 Jaminan 9.0 Warranty

10.0 Manajemen /Pemeriksaan Mutu 10.0 Quality Management/Inspection

11.0 Asuransi 11.0 Insurance

12.0 Ganti Kerugian 12.0 Indemnification

13.0 Pemenuhan Jadwal Kontrak/Ganti Rugi Keterlambatan Pengiriman

13.0 Contract Schedule Compliance/Late Delivery Charges

14.0 Kandungan Lokal 14.0 Local Content

15.0 Nilai Kontrak 15.0 Contract Value

16.0 Jaminan Pelaksanaan 16.0 Securities 17.0 Hukum Yang Mengatur 17.0 Governing Law

18.0 Penyelesaian Sengketa 18.0 Settlement of Disputes

19.0 Pajak dan Bea 19.0 Taxes and Duties

20.0 Pemenuhan Hukum Yang Berlaku 20.0 Compliance with Applicable Law

DAFTAR ISI TABLE OF CONTENTS

21.0 Kesehatan, Keselamatan dan Lingkungan (“KKL”) 21.0 Health, Safety and Environment (“HSE”)

22.0 Keadaan Kahar 22.0 Force Majeure

23.0 Etika Bisnis dan Pembayaran kepada Pejabat 23.0 Business Ethics and Payments to Officials

24.0 Catatan dan Audit 24.0 Records and Audits

25.0 Alas Hak /Kepemilikan atas Pengembangan-pengembangan Kontraktor

25.0 Title/Ownership of Contractor Developments

26.0 Pengalihan dan Sub-kontrak 26.0 Assignment and Subcontracting

27.0 Kerahasiaan, Publisitas dan Pengungkapan 27.0 Confidentiality, Publicity and Disclosure

28.0 Dokumen-dokumen Yang Bertentangan 28.0 Conflicting Documents

29.0 Kewajiban-kewajiban Yang Berlanjut 29.0 Continuing Obligations

30.0 Keterpisahan 30.0 Severability

31.0 Pengesampingan 31.0 Waiver

32.0 Keseluruhan Kontrak dan Perubahan Kontrak 32.0 Entire Contract and Contract Modification

33.0 Bahasa 33.0 Language

34.0 Data Yang Disediakan Perusahaan 34.0 Company Supplied Data

35.0 Operasi-operasi di Lepas Pantai 35.0 Offshore Operations

36.0 Pembatasan Tangungjawab 36.0 Limitation of Liability

37.0 Bagian-bagian 37.0 Counterparts

LAMPIRAN-LAMPIRAN EXHIBITS

Lampiran A Rincian Khusus Kontrak Exhibit A Contract-Specific Details

Lampiran B Penjelasan Proyek Exhibit B Project Description

Lampiran C Lingkup Pekerjaan Exhibit C Scope of Work

Lampiran D Penyelesaian Pekerjaan Exhibit D Completion of Work

Lampiran E Kompensasi Exhibit E Compensation

Lampiran F Ketentuan-ketentuan Administrasi dan Umum Exhibit F Administration and General Requirements

Lampiran G Data Yang Disediakan Perusahaan Exhibit G Company Supplied Data

Lampiran H Jadwal Kontrak Exhibit H Contract Schedule

Lampiran I Perubahan Exhibit I Changes

Lampiran J Bahan Yang Disediakan Perusahaan Exhibit J Company Furnished Material

Lampiran K Formulir Perjanjian Ganti Kerugian Perusahaan Induk/ Korporasi

Exhibit K Form of Parent Company / Corporate Indemnity Agreement

Lampiran F Bentuk Jaminan Pelaksanaan Exhibit L Form of Performance Bond

Lampiran M Ketentuan-ketentuan Kesehatan, Keselamatan dan Lingkungan

Exhibit M Health, Safety & Environmental Requirements

Lampiran N Kode Etik Dan Perilaku Bisnis Perusahaan Exhibit N Company’s Code of Business Ethics and Conduct Lampiran O Rincian-rincian Armada Kontraktor Exhibit O Contractor’s Spread Details

Exhibit Scope of Work

–

contoh :

1.

GENERAL

1.1

Introduction

1.2

Nomenclature

1.3

Facilities

1.4

Contract Objective and Work

1.5

Schedule

1.6

Responsibilities

1.7

Conformance of the Work

1.8

Co t a to s E e utio Pla

Exhibit Scope of Work

–

contoh :

2. SCOPE OF WORK

2.1

WBS-01-01-00-00 Management and Administration Activities

2.1.1

Project Management

2.1.2

Interface Management

2.1.3

Quality Management

2.1.4

HSE Management

2.1.5

Engineering Management

2.1.6

Procurement & Material Management

2.1.7

Construction and Commissioning Management

2.1.8

Marine Activities Management

2.1.9

As-Built Management

2.1.10

Information Management

2.1.11

Regulations, Certificates & Permits

2.1.12

Project Control

Exhibit Scope of Work

–

contoh :

2.2

WBS-01-02-00-00 Engineering Activities

2.2.1

General Engineering Activities

2.2.2

Detailed Engineering Activities

2.3

WBS-01-03-00-00 Procurement and Material Management

2.4

WBS-01-04-00-00 Manufacturing and Fabrication

2.4.1

Subsea Structure Fabrication

2.4.2

Subsea Tie-In Spool Fabrication

2.4.3

Coatings and Anodes

2.4.4

Contractor Representing, Inspection and Testing

Exhibit Scope of Work

–

contoh :

2.5

WBS-01-05-00-00 Installation

2.5.1

General Installation Requirements

2.5.2

Mobilization

2.5.3

Surveys and Positioning

2.5.4

Seabed Preparation

2.5.5

Pipeline/Cable Crossings

2.5.6

Electro/Hydraulic (E/H) Flying Leads Instalation

2.5.7

Subsea Structures

2.5.8

Tie-In Spool Metrology and Installation

2.5.9

Pipeline System Pre-commissioning

Exhibit Scope of Work

–

contoh :

2.6

WBS-01-06-00-00 As Built Activities and Final Documentation

2.6.1

As-built Scope of Work

2.6.2

As-built Procedures

2.6.3

As-built Register

2.6.4

Schedule

2.6.5

Vendor Data

2.6.6

As-built Survey

Detailed

- Data Sheet - Drawing

- MTO _{Vendor A}

Vendor ....

Vendor X Tender by KKKS

-Data sheet -Vendor Data -Vendor Engineering

- Procesure, Construction Eng & Shop Drawing

-Advance Constructability

- Resources : Manpower& Equipment

- Procedure, Installation Engineering, Inst Drawing

- Installation Vessel

- Installation Requirement & Aid

- Procure MTO - Expediting

-A i al Mat l & E pt

Deliverable Detailed Engineering (Semua Discipline : Process, Safety, Mechanical, Electrical,

Instrument, Piping, Structure, Pipeline) adalah pendetailan lebih lanjut dari Deliverable

FEED baik Design Calculation, Specification, Data Sheet dan Drawing yang telah dilakukan

validasi :

•

data pre-engineering survey,

•

verifikasi dengan Operation & Maintenance,

•

review constructibility termasuk instalasi,

•

verifikasi data vendor

•

Interface

- Ready for Commissioning Certificate

- Mechanical Completion (All Subsys tem)

- Operational Test Certificate

- Ready for Start Up Certificate

- Handover State

- Oil/ Gas in

-Ready for Start Up

The Top 10 Mistakes in Project Management :

1. Project Scope is too big

2. The Schedule is too ambitious

3. The

P oje t does t follo a sta da d PM Methodolog

4. Communication breakdowns between the Project Manager

and The Team

5. Risk Assessment process was skimped

6. The Team Members are not productive

7. Resources have been over-allocated

8. Not cracking down hard enough on productivity leaks

9. Incomplete data