• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

The relationship of a mother and a son as portrayed in Mitch Albom`s For One More Day.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "The relationship of a mother and a son as portrayed in Mitch Albom`s For One More Day."

Copied!
98
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

D E Y A R T R O P S A N O S A D N A R E H T O M A F O P I H S N O I T A L E R E H T

S M O B L A H C T I M N

I FORONEMOREDAY

ASARJANAPENDIDIKANTHESIS

s t n e m e r i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P

e h t n i a t b O o

t SarjanaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i

y B i

VekaAprliyaI ntanny 4 2 1 4 1 2 1 5 0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S

M A R G O R P Y D U T S N O I T A C U D E E G A U G N A L H S I L G N E

N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M T R A P E D

N O I T A C U D E D N A G N I N I A R T S R E H C A E T F O Y T L U C A F

Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S

A T R A K A Y G O Y

(2)

i

D E Y A R T R O P S A N O S A D N A R E H T O M A F O P I H S N O I T A L E R E H T

S M O B L A H C T I M N

I FORONEMOREDAY

ASARJANAPENDIDIKANTHESIS

s t n e m e r i u q e R e h t f o t n e m ll if l u F l a it r a P s a d e t n e s e r P

e h t n i a t b O o

t SarjanaPendidikanDegree n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E n i

y B i

VekaAprliyaI ntanny 4 2 1 4 1 2 1 5 0 : r e b m u N t n e d u t S

M A R G O R P Y D U T S N O I T A C U D E E G A U G N A L H S I L G N E

N O I T A C U D E S T R A D N A E G A U G N A L F O T N E M T R A P E D

N O I T A C U D E D N A G N I N I A R T S R E H C A E T F O Y T L U C A F

Y T I S R E V I N U A M R A H D A T A N A S

A T R A K A Y G O Y

(3)
(4)
(5)

v i

’‘

D

o

n

o

t

g

i

v

e

u

p

w

h

e

n

y

o

u

s

t

li

l

h

a

v

e

e

v

i

g

o

t

g

n

i

h

t

e

m

o

s

r

e

v

o

y

ll

a

e

r

s

i

g

n

i

h

t

o

N

g

n

i

y

r

t

p

o

t

s

u

o

y

t

n

e

m

o

m

e

h

t

li

t

n

u

’’

)

s

u

o

m

y

n

o

n

a

(

:

o

t

d

e

t

a

c

i

d

e

d

s

i

s

i

s

e

h

T

s

i

h

T

r

e

h

t

o

M

d

n

a

r

e

h

t

a

F

g

n

i

v

o

L

y

M

r

e

h

t

o

r

B

g

n

i

r

a

C

y

M

l

e

g

n

A

g

n

i

z

a

m

A

y

M

(6)

v

Y T I L A N I G I R O S K R O W F O T N E M E T A T S

h

I onesltydeclaret hat st hi thesis ,which I havew irtten ,doe sno tcontain t hework k

r o w e h t f o s tr a p r

o o fothe rpeople ,except t hosectied i n t hequotaiton sand t he s

e c n e r e f e

r ,a sas cien itifcpapers hould.

, a tr a k a y g o

Y December ,12 2 101

(7)

i v R

E P R A B M E

L NYATAANPERSETUJUANPUBLIKAS IKARYAI LMIAH S

I M E D A K A N A G N I T N E P E K K U T N U

: a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U a w s i s a h a m a y a s ,i n i h a w a b i d n a g n a t a d n a tr e b g n a Y

a m a

N :ViekaAprliyaI ntanny i

s a h a M r o m o

N s wa :0512141 42

n a a k a t s u p r e P a d a p e k n a k ir e b m e m a y a s , n a u h a t e g n e p u m li n a g n a b m e g n e p i m e D

:l u d u jr e b g n a y a y a s h a i m li a y r a k a m r a h D a t a n a S s a ti s r e v i n U

D E Y A R T R O P S A N O S A D N A R E H T O M A F O P I H S N O I T A L E R E H T

Y A D E R O M E N O R O F S M O B L A H C T I M N I

a y a s n a i k i m e d n a g n e

D membeirkan kepada Perpustakaan Universtia sSanata , n i a l a i d e m k u t n e b m a l a d n a k h il a g n e m , s a p m i y n e m k u t n u k a h a m r a h D

, s a t a b r e t a r a c e s a y n n a k i s u b ir t s i d n e m , a t a d n a l a k g n a p k u t n e b m a l a d a y n a l o l e g n e m

it n e p e k k u t n u n i a l a i d e m u a t a t e n r e t n i i d a y n n a k i s a k i b u l p m e

m ngan akademi s

a y a s a m a n n a k m u t n a c n e m p a t e t a m a l e s a y a s a d a p e k n ij i a t n i m e m u lr e p a p n a t

.s il u n e p i a g a b e s

. a y n r a n e b e s n a g n e d t a u b a y a s i n i n a a t a y n r e p t a r u s n a i k i m e D

, a tr a k a y g o Y i d t a u b i D

: l a g g n a t a d a

(8)

ii v

T C A R T S B A ,

y n n a t n

I Vieka Aprliya .2011 .The Relaitonship o a f Mothe rand a Son a s s

m o b l A h c ti M n i d e y a r t r o

P F or One MoreDay. Yogyakatra :Engilsh Language a

r g o r P y d u t S n o it a c u d

E m ,SanataDharmaUniverstiy .

,l e v o n s ’ m o b l A h c ti M s e z y l a n a s i s e h t s i h

T Fo rOne More Day .I ti san

t u o b a s e s s u c s i d t i e c n i s l e v o n g n it s e r e t n

i famliy r elaitonship .Fo rOneMoreDay

a t u o b a s ll e

t s onandhisl ovelymother .Themaincharacte rChalreyi sobsessedt o H

. r e y a l p l l a b e s a b l a n o i s s e f o r p a e

b owever ,he feel sguitly because when hi s n

e h T . r e h d n u o r a t o n s i e h , s e i d r e h t o

m , hedecidest o endhisl fie .Unfo trunately , n

i l u f s s e c c u s n u s i e

h ending hisl fie ,bu thecomes back hometohi sold houseto e

e

s hi sdeadmother . h

T erearethreeproblems formulated discussed i nt hi sthesis :(1 )Howare l

e v o n e h t n i d e b ir c s e d e n il u a P d n a y e lr a h C f o s r e t c a r a h c e h

t ? (2 )How i sthe

n i d e b ir c s e d y e lr a h C d n a e n il u a P n e e w t e b p i h s n o it a l e

r the novel? (3 )How doe s

? r e h t o m s i h h ti w p i h s n o it a l e r s i h n i s t c il f n o c e h t e g a n a m y e lr a h C

y d u t s e h t e c n i

S discusse sabou tthe relaitonship between a son and a ,r

e h t o

m et h psychologica lapproach i sconsidered a sa sutiable one to apply . .

y g o l o d o h t e m a s a y d u t s s i h t n i d e s u s i h c r a e s e r y r a r b il , r e v o e r o M

, l e v o n e h t g n i z y l a n a r e tf

A there are three point stha tcan be concluded . .

y e lr a h C d n a e n il u a P f o s r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b a s i t n i o p t s ri f e h

T Pauilnei sal oving ,

. r e h t o m s u o r o m u h d n a , e v it c e t o r

p Chalrey si abad-tempered person .Someitme s e

h also act srudely .The second point i sabout t herelaitonship between Chalrey .

e n il u a P d n

a Therelaitonship between Chalrey and Pau ilne i sa confilcitng eo .n e

c a f y e h

T both inrtapersona land interpersonal confilct sin thei rrelaitonship. l

e b e r a s a d e b ir c s e d s i y e lr a h C h g u o h tl

A ilou sorr udeperson ,actuallyhel ove she r r

e v r e h t o

m y much. Theth rid conclusionconcern sChalrey’ sconfilc tmanagemen t n

i h is relaitonship wtih hi smother. In managing the confilct ,Chalrey use sfou r . g n i v l o s d n a , n o it it e p m o c , g n it o o h s , e c n a d i o v a e r a y e h T . s e h c a o r p p a t n e r e f fi

d The

s t c il f n o

c between ChalreyandPau ilnea irsebecauseo fdfiferentf actors .Thef ris t e

s u a c e b s i e n

o Cha lrey and Pauilnehave adfiferen tviewofl fie .Anothe rfacto r e

m o

c s frommisunderstandingbetweent hem. ,

t n i o p l a n if a s

A somesuggesitons aregiven t o futureresearchers .Ast hi s n

o s e s u c o f y d u t

s the relaitonship between a son and a mother ,the future study e

z y l a n a y a

m the relaitonship between a son and a father .Fo rteaching learning f o s t n e d u t s e h t r o f g n it ir W c i s a B h c a e t o t d e il p p a e b n a c l e v o n e h t , s e it i v it c a

it a c u d E h s il g n

(9)

ii i v K A R T S B A , y n n a t n

I Vieka Aprliya .2011 .The Relaitonship o a f Mothe rand a Son a s s m o b l A h c ti M n i d e y a r t r o

P F or One More Day. Yogyakatra :Program Stud i s a ti s r e v i n U , s ir g g n I a s a h a B n a k i d i d n e

P SanataDharma.

l u d u jr e b g n a y m o b l A h c ti M a y r a k l e v o n s a h a b m e m i n i i s p ir k

S Fo rOne

. y a D e r o

M Novel i n isanga tmena irk karenamembahast entang hubungan dalam . a g r a u l e k u t a u

s Tokoh utamanya adalah Chalrey yang t erobses imenjad ipemain . l a n o i s e f o r p l l a b e s a

b Dia merasa bersalah terhadap ibunya karena pada saa t n a k s u t u m e m a i d n a i d u m e K . a y n g n i p m a s i d a d a r e b k a d it a i d l a g g n i n e m a y n u b i . a y n p u d i h i ri h k a g n e m k u t n

u Namun, dia itdak berhasli melakukan ha ltersebut . Dia kembal ike rumah masa keclinya dan betremu dengan ibunya yang sudah

. l a g g n i n e m a d

A it ga masalah yang akan dibaha sdalam sk irps iini :(1 )Bagaimana ) 2 ( ? t u b e s r e t l e v o n m a l a d n a k r a b m a g i d e n il u a P n a d y e lr a h C r e t k a r a

k Bagaimana

hubungan antaraChalrey dan i bunyaPauilnedigambarkan dalam novelt ersebut? )

3

( BagaimanaChalreymenyelesaikankonfilkdengani bunya?

k u t n u i a u s e s g n il a p g n a y n a t a k e d n e p n a k a p u r e m i g o l o k i s p n a t a k e d n e P a n e r a k i n i i s p ir k s m a l a d n a k a n u g i

d membahas t entang hubungan antara seorang a y n u b i n a g n e d k a n

a . Metodes tud ipustakajugadtierapkan dalams k irpsii ni . a

l e t e

S h menganailsa nove ltersebut ,ada it gaha lyang dapa tdisimpulkan . Petramayatiut entangkarakte rChalrey danPauilne .Pauilneadalah karakte ryang

n a d , fi t k e t o r p , g n a y a s h i s a k h u n e p g n a y u b i g n a r o e s h a l a d a e n il u a P . r a t a d . s ir o m u

h Chalrey adalah seorang yang emosional .Terkadang diaj ugabertingkah g n a t n e t u ti a y a u d e K . r a s a k n a g n e d u k a

l hubungan antara Chalrey dan Pauilne .

t u b e s i d t a p a d e n il u a P n a d y e lr a h C a r a t n a n a g n u b u h a w h a b n a k l u p m i s i d t a p a D g n a y n a g n u b u h i a g a b e

s penuh dengan konfilk .Chalrey dan Pauilne sama-sama . a k e r e m n a g n u b u h m a l a d l a n o s r e p r e t n i n a d l a n o s r e p a rt n i k il f n o k i p a d a h g n e m y e lr a h C n u p i k s e

M memiilk isfia tpemberontak dan keras ,sebenarnya dia sanga t g n a y h a l a s a m n a g n e d n a g n u b u h r e b a u d e k n a l u p m i s e K . a y n u b i i g n a y a y n e

m kedua

il f n o k n a k i a s e l e y n e m k u t n u y e lr a h C a r a c a n a m i a g a b g n a t n e t u ti a

y kantaradi irnya

k u t n u a d e b r e b g n a y a r a c t a p m e n a k a n u g g n e m y e lr a h C . a y n u b i n a g n e d u ti a y , e n il u a P n a g n e d k il f n o k n a k i a s e l e y n e

m menghindar ,menembak langsung ,

. n a h a c e m e p n a d , i s it e p m o

k Konfilk dapa t tejrad i karena beberapa faktor . n i a l r o t k a F . e n il u a P n a d y e lr a h C a r a t n a n a g n a d n a p n a a d e b r e p u ti a y a y n a r a t n a i D a r a t n a i d n a m a h a p h a l a s e k a y n a d a a n e r a k u ti a y k il f n o k n a k b a b e y n e m t a p a d g n a y . a k e r e m a k ir e b i d , p u t u n e p i a g a b e

S n beberapa saran untuk sk irps i beirkutnya . i k a l k a n a n a d u b i a r a t n a n a g n u b u h g n a t n e t s a h a b m e m i n i i s p ir k

S -lakinya .Untuk

i k a l k a n a n a d h a y a a r a t n a n a g n u b u h g n a t n e t s a h a b m e m t a p a d a y n t u k ir e b i s p ir k s -n a k a n u g i d t a p a d i n i l e v o n u ti a y r a j a g n e m r a j a l e b n a t a i g e k k u t n u n a r a S . a y n i k a l a g a b e

(10)

x i

T N E M G D E L W O N K C

A S

s u o i c a r g s i H . g n i s s e l b s i H r o f s u s e J d r o L t s e r a e d y m o t l u f e t a r g o s m a I

u o r a e l p o e p y n a m h g u o r h t e m n o s e n i h s e v o

l nd meby whom Ihavebeen given

y r e v y m y a s o t e k il d l u o w I .t n e m i n a p m o c c a d n a , e c n a t s i s s a , t n e m e g a r u o c n e , e r a c

. e l p o e p d e v o l e b e s e h t o t s k n a h t t s e b

, r e h t a f d e v o l e b y m o t s e o g s s e n l u f k n a h t y

M Stevanu sSuyud Jatmiko ,my

g n i v o

l mother ,Lusandair ,and my handsome brother ,Gailh Dw iWratsongko .

o t e k il d l u o w I . s i s e h t s i h t g n i h s il p m o c c a n i n o it a v it o m y m e m o c e b e v a h y e h T

. t n e m i n a p m o c c a d n a , r e y a r p , t n e m e g a r u o c n e , n r e c n o c r i e h t r o f m e h t k n a h t

r o s n o p s r o j a m y m o t s e o g e d u ti t a r g t s e g g i b y

M Drs .L .BambangHenda tro

,.

Y M.Hum., fo rhi sadviceand guidance t hrough t he proces so fwiritng oft hi s

o c o t d n a d a e r o t e m it s i h e m g n i w o d n e r o f ,s i s e h

t rrec t ti ,and fo rhi sfathelry in

. m i h m o r f h c u m o s d e v i e c e r e v a h I , y l b a i n e d n U . e m h ti w e g d e l w o n k s i h g n ir a h s

n e it a p s i

H ce ,firendilness ,and carehavecomfo tred mei n i mproving my w iritng

i s e h t y r e v e h g u o r h

t sconsutlaiton Ihad wtih him. oT all l ecturersi n PB ,I I t hank

. a m r a h D a t a n a S n i y d u t s y m g n ir u d s p l e h d n a , s tr o p p u s , s g n i h c a e t ri e h t r o f m e h

t I

e r c e s s ’ I B P k n a h t o s l

a taira tstaff ,Mbak Dh ka ni and MbakT a irfo ralway sbeing .

e m o t t n e it a p d n a e c i n y r e v

n o d e v o l e b y m k n a h t o t e k il d l u o w

I e ,YohanesDw iJat iPurnamaf o rhi s

. y d u t s y m g n ir u d t r o p p u s d n a e r a c , e v o l s s e l d n

e Iamalso gratefult o al lmy PB I

, s d n e ir

f Charula Wisnu Wardhani ,Fti iryani ,Caro ilna Tr iDew iTimTim ,and

a ti h u r u P i t s r A a g e V a n e r e

(11)

x

r i e h T . e t o r w I s i s e h t e h t d r a w o t s n o it s e g g u s d n a m s i c it ir c r i e h t h ti w y p p a h y r e v

e e b e v a h s n o it s e g g u s d n a m s i c it ir

c n very helpfu lfor t he accompilshmen to fmy

y l d n i k o s e v a h o h w l l a s s e l b o t d r o L s u o i c a r g y m o t r e y a r p y m s i t I . s i s e h t

. e m it s i h t ll a h g u o r h t e m d e r e t s o f d n a d e tr o p p u s

o

T thosewho havebeen helping mei ncompleitngt hist hesi st hat Icould

n o it n e m t o

n here , Iwould ilket ot hankt hemf ort hei reffo trs .

y n n a t n I a y li r p A a k e i V

(12)

i x

S T N E T N O C F O E L B A T

e g a P E

L T I

T PAGE………. …… ...…

E G A P L A V O R P P

A S ……….…...……

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … E G A P N O I T A C I D E D

… … … … … … … … … Y T I L A N I G I R O S ’ K R O W F O T N E M E T A T

S ..………

A Y R A K I S A K I L B U P N A U J U T E S R E P N A A T A Y N R E P R A B M E L

H A I M L

I ……….. T

C A R T S B

A ………..……

K A R T S B

A ………..……… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … S T N E M G D E L W O N K C A

F O E L B A

T CONTENTS……….

N O I T C U D O R T N I .I R E T P A H C

.

A Backgroundoft heStudy………..… .

B ProblemFormulaiton………..….………...… .

C Objecitve soft heStudy……….…… … …. .

D Benefti soft heStudy …….……….….… … …. .

E Deifniitono fTerm s……….…………

E R U T A R E T I L D E T A L E R F O W E I V E R . I I R E T P A H C

.

A Reviewo fRelatedStudie s………..……….… .

B Reviewo fRelatedTheo ire s………..………..… .

1 C iritca lApproache s………..……….… .

2 Character………..… …… ……… … .

a Deifniitono fCharacter s………..… …… …. …… . .

b Type so fCharacter s………...… …… ……….. .

3 Characteirzaiton………..…………..… ... .

a Deifniitono fCharacteirzaiton………..………… ..… … … . .

b Characteirzaiton………..……… ..… ..… i ii v i

v

i v

ii v

ii i v

x i xi

1 3 4 4 4

(13)

ii x

4. Famliy……….………..…………. y

li m a F f o g n i n a e M .

a ………..………

.

b Kind so fFamliy …………..……… …. ..… … …. )

1 Nuclea rFamliy …………..………..………..… ... )

2 ExtendedFamliy …… ………..……… ..… .

5 Relaitonshipi naFamliy …… ……….…… ..… ………. … .

a Mother-SonRelaitonship……….……… … .

b Father-SonRelaitonship………..…………. .

6 Confilct……… … …. … …..………..… … .

a Deifniitono fConfilc t……….… .… … .

b Kind so fConfilct s……….….……… r

e h t o M n i t c il f n o C .

c -SonRelaitonship…….….…… ….… ….… …. .

d Confilcti nFather-SonRelaitonship……… ….. …….…… …

… … … … … … … t n e m e g a n a M t c il f n o C .

e … ……. ……..…………

)

1 BePrepared……….……….…..……….. )

2 BeI nvolved……..………..………..… … )

3 WtihholdQuickReto tr s………..………..…..… )

4 ReviewandSummairze………..…………..……….. …

… … … … … … … … … s n o it u l o s e R t c il f n o C .

f …… ..… …………

)

1 Blake’ sandMounton’ sConfilc tResoluiton………. )

2 Pruti’t sandRubin’ sConfilc tResoluiton…….……… …… … .. )

3 Rusbul’t sandMounton’ sConfilc tResoluiton……… ……… .. .

7 Value……….………. ..… ……..…… .

a D feiniitono fValue………..………….…….…… .

b Impo tran tValueo fLfie………..… ..…….…… )

1 Respect……….………..…………..………..……..….. )

2 dUn erstanding……….………..………… )

3 Discipilne……….………….………..……….….……….. .

(14)

ii i x Y G O L O D O H T E M . I I I R E T P A H C

.

A Objec toft heStudy………..………...… .

B Approachoft heStudy……… …… ……… .

C Methodoft heStudy……….………

. V I R E T P A H

C ANALYSIS

.

A TheDescirp itonoft heCharacter s…………..……… .

1 Characteirzaitono fPauilne……… ..…… ……..… . .

2 Characteirzaitono fChalrey……….. .

B T heRelaitonshipo fChalreyandPauilne……… .

1 TheRelaitonshipa saMothe randaCh lid.… ..………..… . .

a BeforeHi sParen’tsDivorce……… …… .... … .

b Afte rHi sParen’tsDivorce……… … .

2 TheRelaitonshipasaMothe randanAdul t……….…..…… .

a TheRelaitonshipBeforeCha lreyi sMarired……..….……… .

b TheRelaitonshipAfte rChalreyi sMar ired……… …… …. .

C Chalrey’ sConfilc tManagemen tinHi sRelaitonshipwtihH i s r

e h t o

M ………...

.

1 A saMothe randaChlid……… .. …… … ……….. .

a BeforeHi sMother’ sDivorce……….……….. .

b Afte rHi sMother’ sDivorce……… …… ………. .

2 A saMothe randanAdul t……….… .…………. .

a Confilc tManagemen tBeforeCha lreyi sMarired……….. .

b Confilc tManagemen tA tfe rChalreyi sMarired………

V R E T P A H

C .CONCLUSIONSANDSUGGESTIONS .

A Conclusions……… .

B Suggesitons .………... .

1 Suggesitonf o rFutureStudy……… .

2 Suggesitonf o rTeachingLearningAcitviite sUsingLtierary

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … k r o

W .

28 30 30

32 34 36 37 37 37 1 4 43 43 45

47 48 48 0 5 52 52 54

57 58 9 5

(15)

v i x S

E C N E R E F E

R ……….………

S E C I D N E P P

A …… ………

0 6

(16)

v x

S E C I D N E P P A F O T S I L

Page

… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … r e v o C s e c i d n e p p

A ………..……. .

L . 1 x i d n e p p

A essonPlano fBasicWiritng……… … … … … … … … . . … … … g n it ir W c i s a B f o l a ir e t a M g n i h c a e T . 2 x i d n e p p A

x i d n e p p

A 3 .TheSummaryo fFo rOneMoreDay………..…… x

i d n e p p

A 4 .TheCove ro fMtichAlbom’ sFo rOneMoreDay………….………... p

p

A endix5 .Lis to fWorks…..………...

(17)

1 R E T P A H

C I

N O I T C U D O R T N I

Thi schapte rpresent s ifvepatrs .Thefris tpatri sbackground of t hestudy .I t

, l e v o n s ’ m o b l A h c ti M g n i s o o h c r o f n o s a e r e h t s n i a l p x

e Fo rOne More Day .The

d n o c e

s par ti sproblem formulaiton which concern sthe problem stha tlead to the

. y d u t s e h t f o s i s y l a n

a The t hrid patr i st heobjecitve sof t he study .The fou trh par t

t r a p t s a l e h T . d e t a t s e r a y d u t s e h t g n it c u d n o c f o s m i a e h t , y d u t s e h t f o s ti f e n e b s e t a t s

.s i s e h t s i h t n i d e s u s m r e t f o n o it i n if e d s i

.

A Backgroundoft heStudy

Amotheri san i mpo tran t ifgurei n ourl fie .Amothe rplay sani mpo trantr ole

e w e c n i s s u r o f r e v i g e r a c y r a m ir p e h t s i e h S . n e r d li h c e h t f o e r a c g n i k a t d n a g n i s i a r n i

e h t s e v i g e h s , e r o m r e h tr u F . n e r d li h c r e h f o l l a r o f e v o l t a e r g a s a h r e h t o m A . n r o b e r a

i h

c ldren love ,atteniton ,and care .Freud (1990 )stated tha trelaitonship between

( e n o e u q i n u e h t s i n e r d li h c d n a r e h t o

m p .320) .Therei sas rtongemo itona loccurirng

n I . r e t h g u a d d n a n o s r e h r o f n o s r e p t s e s o l c e h t s e m o c e b e h s , e r o f e r e h T . n e e w t e b n i

t s a rt n o

c ,adaughte rmayhavecloserr elaitonshipt oherf athe rwhlieas oni sclosert o

a e li h w , e fi l s i h n i t h g if o t n o s a r o f e r u g if t n a tr o p m i n a s a h r e h t a f A . r e h t o m s i h

o t y ll a i c e p s e e c n a h c a s a h r e h t o m A . tr a e h s i h m o r f k n i h t o t n o s a s e h c a e t r e h t o m

a h c a e

t sonhowt o rtea tagilr .Thi swli lbehelpfulf o rhimespeciallyt ohaveabette r

. e r u t u f e h t n i p i h s n o it a l e

r

o t g n i d r o c c

A Freud (1990) ,al lmother swan tto be queen sto he rson s(p .

A . ) 7 2

(18)

o t n i s r e t n

e hisl fieetihe ra sagrifl irend o ra sawfie .Int hi sstage ,amothe rwillf ee l

. l u f r a e f s e m o c e b d n a e r u c e s n

i Shehast osharet hel ovewtih someoneelsewho i sa s

. e fi l s ’ n o s r e h s a t n a tr o p m

i He rposiiton ast heonlywomeni n he rson’sl fiewli lbe

. n a m o w r e h t o n a y b n o o s d e c a l p e

r I ti s itme to understand each other ,a mothe r

e fi l n w o r i e h t e v a h n o o s l li w n o s r e h t a h t e z il a e r d l u o h

s andsheshouldno tholdhe r

. e m it e h t ll a n o

s When a son l eave shi smother t o seek successi n l fie ,hedoe sno t

l e e f ll i w r e h t o m a t a h t w o n k t o n s e o d n o s A . l u f n i a p r e h t o m e h t s e k a m t i t a h t w o n k

y a w a g n i o g s i h t t a l u ft r u

h . I tha sbeen known t ha tamotherand a ns o someitme s

e v a

h as pecia lbond ,bu ttidoe sno tmeant ha tmothersl ovet heris on smoret hant hei r

u a

d ghters .

r e h t o m

A -son relaitonship can also be porrtayed in a nove l il ke Fo rOne y

a D e r o

M . tI i sone o fthe ltierary work sand that pictures the wo lrd we ilve . )

9 9 9 1 ( a i o i G d n a y d e n n e

K notedtha ta noveli sapictureofr eall fieandmanner sand

t f

o he itme in which i twa sw irtten ( .p 266). tI deal swtih a human character in a

l a i c o

s stiuaiton. We wli l ifnd human character si n Fo rOne More Day namely e

n il u a

P ast hemothe rand ChalreyBenetto ast heson wtih t hei rsocia lstiuaiton t hey

e c a f .

n i d e w o h s s i t

I thi snove ltha ta mother ha seterna llove to he rson. He r

t s e t a e r

g lovet o he rson i st heonly t hing which can forgivehe rson .Fo rOneMore y

a

D i sa famliy story .The main character Chalrey “Chick” Benetto i stold by hi s y

o b s ’ a m a m a e b n a c u o Y “ , r e h t a

f o ra daddy’ sboy ,bu tyou can’ tbeboth.”So he

y o b s ’ y d d a d a e b o t s e d i c e

d . Chalrey ilves happliywtihhisf amliy ,bu tyear sa tfe rh si

t n e r a

p sfaceconitnuou sproblems in t hei rmarirage .Thecilmaxo ftheseproblemsi s

t n e r a p s i h f o e c r o v i d e h

(19)

e h , r e tf a s r a e Y . r e t s i s r e g n u o

y leaveshi smotherandhisf amliyuntlis hepasse saway

. y l d e t c e p x e n

u Chalreyfeelsguitlyto hi smothe rbecausewhenhi smothe rdies ,hei s

F . r e h d n u o r a n i t o

n inally he becomes desperate and leaves hi swfie and chlidren .

d e m o

S ecadesl ater ,Chalrey i sabrokenman .Hisl fieha sbeencrumbled byalcoho l

y li m a f s i h s e v a e l e H . b o j s i h s e s o l e H . t e r g e r d n

a and hedecidest o kli lhimsefl. He

. n w o t e m o h l l a m s s i h o t e d ir t h g i n d i m a s e k a

m Het irest oendhisl fiebycrashinghi s

m o r f g n i p m u j d n a k c u rt o t r a

c a wate rtower .Unfo trunately ,he i sunsuccessfu lto

e fi l s i h d n

e ,but eh comebackt ohi soldhouse .He ifnds an amazin gdiscoveryinhi s

e s u o h d l

o .Hi smothe,rwhodieseigh tyear sago ,stli l ilvesthere da n greetswelcome

n e p p a h r e v e g n i h t o n f i s a e m o h m i

h s.

e h

T famliy relaitonship between mothe rand son a sporrtayed in Mtich

s ’ m o b l

A Fo rOne More Day i sinteresitng to discuss .Thi si san interesitng and p i h s n o it a l e r d o o g a d li u b o t e v a h e W . p i h s n o it a l e r y li m a f t u o b a y r o t s g n i h c u o t

r e b m e m e h t g n o m

a s o fthe famliy .T shis i the main reason why Iwill discus sthe

d n a , r e h t o m s i h d n a r e t c a r a h c n i a m e h t n e e w t e b p i h s n o it a l e

r laso abou ttheway t o

. p i h s n o it a l e r e h t n i a t n i a m

.

B ProblemFormula iton

s a d e t a l u m r o f e r a s m e l b o r p e h t , d n u o r g k c a b e h t f o n o it a l u m r o f e h t n o d e s a B

: s w o ll o f

.

1 Howaret hecharacter sofChalreyandPauilnedescirbedi nt henovel?

.

2 How i s the relaitonship between Pau ilne and Chalrey descirbed in Mtich

s ’ m o b l

A Fo rOneMoreDay? .

(20)

.

C Objecitve soft heStudy

o t d e d n e t n i s i l a r e n e g n i s i s e h t s i h

T descirbet hecharacteirsitc so fPau ilnea s

d n a r e h t o m

a Chalrey a sa son in thi snovel .Fu trhermore ,the analysi so fthe

. d e s s u c s i d e b o s l a l li w y e lr a h C d n a e n il u a P n e e w t e b p i h s n o it a l e

r Researcher wli l

e z y l a n

a Chalrey’ sconfilc tmanagemen tto solvet heconfilc tin hisr elaitonship wtih

. e n il u a

P

.

D Beneftis fo theStudy h c r a e s e r s i h

T i sexpected to give valuable contirbuiton fo rthe fo llowing

l p o e

p e .The fris ti saddressed to the reader .They can ge tthe understanding o f

l li w y e h T . l e v o n s i h t n i t n e m e l e t n a tr o p m i n a s i ti s a l e v o n e h t f o n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c

e g o s l

a tsome messages through the nove ltha twe mus tmaintain ou rrelaitonship

. r e h t o m h ti w y ll a i c e p s e s t n e r a p r u o h ti w

y d u t S n o it a c u d E e g a u g n a L h s il g n E f o r e h c a e t e h t o t d e s s e r d d a s i d n o c e s e h T

c n i a tr e c y l p p a n a c y e h T . m a r g o r P y d u t S r e tt e L h s il g n E d n a m a r g o r

P hapte roft hi s

t n e d u t s h c a e t o t l e v o

n ,f o rexampleinr eadingclassandanswers omequesiton sbased

. l e v o n t a h t n o

.

E De ifniitono fTerms

y e h T . g n i d n a t s r e d n u s i m d i o v a o t g n i y fi r a l c d e e n s m e ti e m o

S a re:

.

1 Relaitonship

A Comprehensive Dicitonary o fPsychologica land Psychoanalyitca lTerms e

n if e

d s relaitonship ast hef ac to fanykind ofr elation between personst hati sbased

. t n e c e d n o m m o c n o p

u According to Horace & Ava (1970) ,relaitonship usually

o h t s a p i h s n o it a l e r d e z i n g o c e r y ll a i c o s e s o l c h c u s s e d u l c n

(21)

n o it p o d

a ( .p 248 .) In thi sstudy ,the relaitonship between a mothe rand a son i s

. d e s u c o

f Ther elaitonshipo fChalreyandPauilnei saf amliyr elaitonship .Threeyear s

a r e h e v i g d o G y ll a n i F . y l d a b m i h s t n a w y ll a e r e n il u a P , d e ir r a m r e tf

a son named

. n o s a d n a r e h t o m a s a r e h t o h c a e h ti w e t a c i n u m m o c d n a t c a r e t n i y e h T . y e lr a h C

.

2 MaternalRelaitonship

. p i h s n o it a l e r l a n r e t a m m o r f t n e r e f fi d s i p i h s n o it a l e r l a n r e t a

P Mothe rand

. n e r d li h c r i e h t h ti w p i h s n o it a l e r e h t n i s e l y t s t n e r e f fi d e v a h r e h t a

f Int hebooken itlted

p i h s n o it a l e R y li m a F n i n o it a c i n u m m o

C by Nolle rand Ftizpatirck (1993) ,‘Mother

-e h t f o n o it r o p o r p r e t a e r g h ti w , g n i k a t e r a c y b d e t a n i m o d e b o t d n e t s n o it c a r e t n i d li h c

s e it i v it c a e s e h t n o t n e p s g n i e b n e r d li h c r i e h t h ti w d n e p s s r e h t o m e m

it . ’’ (p .206) . In

, n o it i d d

a Nolle rand Ftizpatirck (1993 )noted tha to hn t e othe rhand ,father-ch lid

s n o it c a r e t n i ri e h t f o n o it r o p o r p r e t a e r g h c u m h ti w y a l p y b d e t a n i m o d s i p i h s n o it a l e r

y a l p n o d e s u c o f g n i e b n e r d li h c r i e h t h ti

w ( .p 206 .) We can ifnd in the nove ltha t

s i h e li h W . y e lr a h C o t n o it n e tt a d n a n o it c e f f a g n i v i g n i n o it n e tt a e r o m s a h e n il u a P

s d n e p s r e h t a

f moreoft he itmeavaliablei nplayacitviite silkebaseball .

.

3 Famliy

e k c o L d n a s s e g r u

B (1975 )descirbedtha tfamliya sagroup o fperson suntied

y

b ite so fblood ,marirage o radop iton ;consttiuitng a single household interacitng

d n a d n a b s u h f o s e l o r l a i c o s e v it c e p s e r r i e h t n i r e h t o h c a e h ti w g n it a c i n u m m o c d n a

d n a g n it a e r c d n a , r e t s i s d n a r e h t o r b , r e t h g u a d d n a n o s , r e h t a f d n a r e h t o m , e fi w

g n i n i a t n i a

m acommoncutlure( .p )8 . Int hebooken itltedCommunicaitoni nFamliy p

i h s n o it a l e

R , the f rist clas s o f famliy de ifniiton i s based on famliy srtucture .

r e ll o N o t g n i d r o c c

A and Ftizpat irck( 1993) ,‘’Mos to fu suset het erm f amliyi nt wo

e h w ) a ( : s y a w n o m m o

(22)

s n i s u o c d n a , s t n u a , s t n e r a p d n a r g , s g n il b i s s a h c u s e g a ir r a m r o d o o l b y b s e v it a l e

r ’ ’

( .p1 9 .)

o tt e n e B y e lr a h C d n a e n il u a P n e e w t e b p i h s n o it a l e r e h t , y r o e h t t a h t n o d e s a B

tI . p i h s n o it a l e r y li m a f o t s g n o l e

b i sbecausePauilneandBenetto areuntiedby ite so f

a s a r e h t o h c a e h ti w e t a c i n u m m o c d n a t c a r e t n i y e h T . n o s a d n a r e h t o m a s a d o o l b

n o s a d n a r e h t o

m .Ch lidren statr t o l earn anything i n afamliy .Pau ilnea sa mothe r

n u g n i h t e l p m i s a m o r f o tt e n e B s e h c a e

t tlit hebig t hing i n hisl fie ,even t hough tii s

r e h t a f a h ti w e n o d y l n o m m o

c .

.

4 Character

s m a r b

A (1981 )explaine dtha tcharacteri stheperson spresentedi nadramaitc

s i h c i h w , k r o w e v it a r r a n r

o interpreted byt hereader sa sbeing endowed wtih mora l

d d n

a isposiitona lquailitest ha tareexpressedi nwhatt heys ay-thedialogu -esandwha t

o d y e h

t -the aciton ( .p 2 . 0) In a novel ,acharacte rmay remain essenitally stable o r

. s e g n a h

c There aret wo character st hat wli lbe analyzed i n t hi sstudy, Pau ilne a sa

e h t o

m rand Charilea sason .Both character shavei mpo trantr olei n astory .Pauilne

m o r f y r o t s e h t n i t u o e m o c s y a w l a y e h T . y r o t s e h t f o e rt n e c e h t s e m o c e b y e lr a h C d n a

y r o t s e h t f o d n e e h t li t n u g n i n n i g e b e h

(23)

7 I I R E T P A H C

E R U T A R E T I L D E T A L E R F O W E I V E R

d e t a l e r f o w e i v e r a t u o b a s i tr a p t s ri f e h T . s tr a p r u o f f o s t s i s n o c r e t p a h c s i h T

y d a e rl a s e i d u t

s conducted that discus sthe same novel .The second par ti sabou t

ti r c f o y r o e h t e h t f o s t s i s n o c t a h t w e i v e r l a c it e r o e h

t ica lapproaches ,theory o f

d e t a l e r f o w e i v e r e h t s i tr a p d ri h t e h T . n o it a z ir e t c a r a h c f o y r o e h t e h t d n a , r e t c a r a h c

r e h t o m f o y r o e h t e h t , y li m a f f o y r o e h t e h t : r u o f o t n i d e d i v i d s i d n a y r o e h

t -son

r e h t a f f o y r o e h t e h t , p i h s n o it a l e

r -son relaitonship ,and the theory o fconfilct .The

. k r o w e m a r f l a c it e r o e h t e h t s i e n o t s a l

.

A Reviewo fRelatedStudies y a D e r o M e n O r o

F i sanove lw irtten by Mtich Albom . tIt ell sabou tason s i h h ti w p i h s n o it a l e r s i h n i a t n i a m o t r e h t o m d e v o l e b s i h y b e c n a h c a n e v i g s i o h w

y B . r e h t o

m readingt hi snove,lt hewrtie rwould ilket o shareaboutt hemeaningo f

y lr a e e h t s i e h S . n e r d li h c r e h r o f e v o l s s e l d n e s a h o h w r e h t o m a y ll a i c e p s e , y li m a f

r e v i g e r a

c fo rhe rchlidren .A mothe rgive satten iton ,careand l ove t o he rchlidren

p e c n o c e h t e c n i

s itonuntlit heendoft heril fie .Event houghhe rch lidrenmakesome

. m e h t e v i g r o f s y a w l a l li w r e h t o m a , e fi l ri e h t n i s e k a t s i m

s ’ m o b l A h c ti

M Fo rOneMore Day is i nteresitng t o discuss .Therearet wo s

a w e n o t s ri f e h T .l e v o n s i h t h ti w d e t a l e r e n o d s e i d u t

s wirtten by Dian Prawesiti n

s i y d u t s r e h f o e lt it e h T . 9 0 0

2 TheI nlfuenceo fBenetto’sI ntrapersona lConfilct son y

a D e r o M e n O r o F s m o b l A h c ti M n i d e t c e lf e R s a e fi L l a n o s r e P s i

h .I tmainly

r e p a rt n i s i h d n a r e t c a r a h c s ’ o tt e n e B y e lr a h C t u o b a s e s s u c s i

(24)

s i h

t thesis ,Prawest ifocuse son Chalrey Benetto’ sinrtapersona lconfilcts wtih hi s

t a h t s e d u l c n o c i t s e w a r P . r e h t a

f Chalrey Benetto face s ifve majo rinrtapersona l

, e r o m r e h tr u F . s t c il f n o

c Chalrey Benetto’ s inrtapersona l confilc t give s negaitve

s t c e f f

e onhi sbehaviorwhich ifnallydesrtoyhi sownpersonall fie .

d n o c e s e h

T study i sw irtten by Est iDewant ienitlted A Study o fChick .

y a D e r o M e n O r o F s m o b l A h c ti M n i n e e s s a s t c il f n o C s o tt e n e

B Thist hesi sw as

s i d y l n i a m d n a 9 0 0 2 n i n e tt ir

w cusse s Chalrey Benetto’ scharacteirsitcs ,Chalrey

t c il f n o c s ’ o tt e n e

B s and the resoluiton to hi sconfilcts .Dewant iconcludes tha t

y e lr a h

C Benetto faces t wo t ype so fconfilct ,namely i nterna lconfilc tand externa l

s e t a t s o s l a i t n a w e D , n o it i d d a n I .t c il f n o

c tha tChalrey Benettouse saccommodaiton

t c il f n o c s i h e v l o s o t s e p y t g n i d i o v a d n

a s .

e s o h t n o d e s a

B studies, i tcanbeconcluded t ha tChalrey Benetto facestwo

s i t c il f n o c l a n r e t n I . t c il f n o c l a n r e t x e d n a l a n r e t n i y l e m a n e fi l s i h n i s t c il f n o c n i a m

e d e h n e h

w al swtih hi smind .The externa lconfilct i swhen Chalrey Benetto ha s

s i h , r e h t o m s i h , r e h t a f s i h s a h c u s s r e t c a r a h c r e h t o h ti w w e i v f o t n i o p t n e r e f fi d

e s o h t o t g n ir e d i s n o C . c t e , e fi w s i h , r e t s i

s studies, t hi sstudy wli lanalyze how the

n e e w t e b p i h s n o it a l e

r Pauilne and Chalrey Benetto and how Chalrey Benetto

s e g a n a

m ther elaitonshipwtih Pauilne.I temphasizes on t her elaitonship betweena

. n o s a d n a r e h t o

m T his covers the characteirsitc so fChalrey Benetto and Pauilne ,

e c a f y e h t t c il f n o c t a h

w int herir elationship ,andhowt heys olvet heconfilct.

.

B Reviewo fRelatedTheories

(25)

f o y r o e h t , h c a o r p p a l a c it ir c f o y r o e h t e r a s e ir o e h t e s o h T . l e v o n e h t g n i z y l a n a

c a r a h c f o y r o e h t d n a , r e t c a r a h

c teirzaiton.

.

1 Criitca lApproaches

According to Rohrberge r and Wood s J r (1971) in thei r book enitlted

e r u t a r e ti L t u o b a g n it i r W d n a g n i d a e

R ,thereare ifveapproachest o analyzeanove l ( .p )6 . Thefris tapproach i st he formails tapproach .Thi sapproach focuse son t he

t I . k r o w s i h n i s e s u r o h t u a e h t t a h t e r u t c u rt s d n a s e u q i n h c e

t only examines the

e c a l p s ti o t r o k r o w e h t f o e r n e g , e fi l s ’ r o h t u a e h t o t e c n e r e f e r t u o h ti w k r o w y r a r e ti l

o t e c n e r e f e r t u o h ti w d n a y r o t s i h y r a r e ti l n i r o k r o w e h t f o t n e m p o l e v e d e h t n

i sti

l a i c o

s env rionment .Second approach i sthe biographica lapproach .Thi sapproach

f o e c e i p e n o e z y l a n a o t t n i o p t n a tr o p m i n a s i r o h t u a e h t f o e fi l e h t t a h t s e v e il e b

d n a e fi l e h t t u o b a n a c y e h t s a h c u m s a n r a e l o t s t p m e tt a t I . k r o w y r a r e ti l

o t n e m p o l e v e

d f the autho r and to apply thi s knowledge in thei r attempt s to

. s g n it ir w s i h d n a t s r e d n u

s i h c a o r p p a d ri h t e h

T the sociocutlural-histo irca lApproach .Thi sapproach t a h t n o it a z il i v i c e h t o t e c n e r e f e r n i s i k r o w l a e r e h t e t a c o l o t y a w y l n o e h t t a h t s t s i s n i

r

p oduced ti . Based on sociocutlural-histo ircal approach , society and histo irca l

y r a r e ti l a d n a t s r e d n u o t r e d r o n i d e z y l a n a e b o t s g n i h t l a i c u r c e h t e r a d n u o r g k c a b

s i h c a o r p p a t x e N . k r o

w the mythopoeic approach .The aim o fthi sapproach i sto

n i a tr e c r e v o c s i

d universally recurren t pattern s i f human though t which the

n i d n u o f t a h t e s o h t o t d e t a l e r s i s n r e tt a p t n e r r u c e R . s i t r a f o s k r o w t n a c if i n g i s

e v a h y e h t t a h t t h g u o h t n a m u h o t c i s a b o s e r a d n a s e ti r s k l o f d n a s h t y m t n e i c n a

a o r p p a t s a l e h T . n e m l l a r o f g n i n a e

(26)

t I .s n r e tt a p t n e r r u c e r n i a tr e c e t a rt s n o m e d d n a e t a c o l o t tr o f f e e h t s e v l o v n i h c a o r p p a

n i n e tt ir w s n r e tt a p r o i v a h e b d n a y ti l a n o s r e p , n o it a v it o m n a m u h o t d e t a l e r y ll a u s u s i

. s t c e j b o y r a r e ti l

.

2 Character .

a De ifniitono fCharacters

k o o b s i h n i s m a r b A y b n e v i g s i r e t c a r a h c f o n o it i n if e d

A Glossary o f

s m r e T y r a r e ti

L .Abrams( 1981 )explained tha tcharacter saretheperson spresented

g n i e b s a s r e d a e r e h t y b d e t e r p r e t n i e r a o h w , k r o w e v it a r r a n r o c it a m a r d a n i

l a r o m h ti w d e w o d n

e anddisposiitona lquailitest ha tareexpressedi nwhatt heysay-

s e u g o l a i d e h

t - and wha ttheydo- theaciton( p .2 . 0) Anothe rdeifniitono fcharacte r

: n o it c i F k o o b s i h n i s b o c a J d n a s tr e b o R y b n e v i g s

i AnI ntroducitont o Readingand

g n it i r

W .Robetr sandJ acobs(1989 )stated thatt hecharacter sareanextendedverba l d n a h c e e p s , s t h g u o h t s e n i m r e t e d t a h t fl e s r e n n i e h t , g n i e b n a m u h a f o n o it a t n e s e r p e r

v a h e

b io r(p .143). Based on tha ttheory ,i tcan be concluded tha tcharacte ri sa

r a n r o c it a m a r d a n i n o s r e

p raitve work who i salso a representaiton o fa human

. g n i e b

.

b Type so fCharacters e

l k n e

H (1977) stated tha tthere are two kind so fcharacter sbased on the

e t c a r a h c r o n i m d n a r o j a m : e c n a tr o p m

i r (s p .86 .) Amajo rcharacteri sacen rteoft he

n a s a h t I . y r o t

s impo trantr olei nas tory .Ther eade rwli lpaymos toft heatten itont o

e w , y r o t s e h t d n a t s r e d n u o t r e d r o n I . r e t c a r a h c r o n i m n a h t r e h t a r r e t c a r a h c r o j a m

(27)

n i o p t n a tr o p m i s s e

l tin a story rathe rthan majo rcharacter .I tha s ilmtied role o f

f o t n e m p o l e v e d e h t n i r e tr o p p u s a s a e l o r a s a h r e t c a r a h c r o n i M . y r o t s a n i n o it c a

.r e t c a r a h c r o j a m

. M .

E Forste r(1974 )divided charactersi nto lfa tandr ound character ( .p 4 . 6)

r a h c t a lf

A acter can also be called a type o rtwo-dimensional .I ti sconsrtucted

. li a t e d g n i z il a u d i v i d n i h c u m t u o h ti w d e t n e s e r p s i d n a y ti l a u q r o a e d i e l g n i s a d n u o r a

a n i y r o t s e h t f o d n e e h t li t n u g n i n n i g e b e h t m o r f d e c u d o rt n i y ll a u s u s r e t c a r a h c t a l F

p ir c s e d e l b a t

s iton .Forste r add ssome advantage so f lfa tcharacters. The grea t

e h t y b y l n o t o n d e z i n g o c e r y li s a e e r a y e h t t a h t s i s r e t c a r a h c t a lf f o e g a t n a v d a

s i e g a t n a v d a d n o c e s A . e y e l a n o it o m e s ’ r e d a e r e h t y b o s l a t u b e y e l a u s i v s ’ r e d a e r

i s a e e r a s r e t c a r a h c t a lf t a h

t lyr ememberedbyt her eade rsince lfa tcharacter sareno t

e h t li t n u g n i n n i g e b e h t m o r f e m a s e h t e b o t n i a m e r s r e t c a r a h c t a l F . e g n a h c y li s a e

s i tI . n o it a v it o m d n a t n e m a r e p m e t n i x e l p m o c s i r e t c a r a h c d n u o r A . y r o t s e h t f o d n e

s r e t c a r a h c d n u o r e s u a c e b c i m a n y

d can have capablitiy to change .I tcan change

e k a m n a c s r e t c a r a h c d n u o r f o g n i g n a h c e h T . n o it i d n o c d n a n o it a u ti s e h t n o d e s a b

. e s ir p r u s r e d a e r e h t

.

3 Characteriza iton .

a De ifniitono fCharacteriza iton s d o o W d n a r e g r e b r h o

R (1971 )deifned characteirzaiton a sthe proces sby

c i h

w h an autho rcreate sacharacte r(p .20) .In addiiton ,according t o Robetr sand

s b o c a

J (1989 )characteirzaiton i sthe way that an autho ruse sto give informaiton

s r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b

(28)

r o h t u a n a s p l e h n o it a z ir e t c a r a h C . r e h t o n a e n o m o r f m e h t h s i u g n it s i d t a h t s e t u b ir tt a

l a e r m r o f s n a rt o

t -lfiepeoplei ntocharacteri n ifciton .

.

b Characteriza iton

s d o o W d n a r e g r e b r h o

R (1971) s aid tha tthere are two p irncipa lway sa

r e t c a r a h

c can be characteirzed ( .p 2 . 0) F rist ,he can use d riec tmean sto descirbe

e h t h g u o r h t r e t c a r a h c e b ir c s e d n a c e h , r e v o e r o M . r e t c a r a h c a f o e c n a r a e p p a l a c i s y h p

r e h e c a l p d n a s n a e m c it a m a r d e s u n a c e h , d n o c e S . s e t u b ir tt a l a r o m d n a l a u t c e ll e t n i

s t a h w w o h s o t n o it a u ti s n

i he i sby the way she behave so rspeaks .Then the

. n o it a u ti s e h t n o d e s a b y a w r a l u c it r a p a n i t c a e r ll i w r e t c a r a h c

n o t n a t

S (1965 )stated tha tthey are fou rway sin creaitng the characters

( .p )1 . 7 Frislty ,the autho rgive sname sto the characters .Secondly, the autho r

e h t g n it a e r c s i t x e N . s r e t c a r a h c e h t n o p u s t n e m m o c d n a y lt i c il p x e s e b ir c s e d

e h T . s r e t c a r a h c r o j a m e h t s d r a w o t e d u ti tt a ’ s r e t c a r a h c r o n i m e h t h g u o r h t s r e t c a r a h c

d n a h c e e p s n w o r i e h t h g u o r h t e r a s r e t c a r a h c e h t t a h w s w o h s r o h t u a e h t , e n o t s a l

a h e

b vior .

, n o it i d d a n

I MJ. . Murphy (1972 ) in hi s book Understanding Unseens w

o h

s e d nine way show the autho rmake sthe reader sunderstand the character

( .p161) . Fris t way i s called persona l descirpiton . The autho r can descirbe a

e c n a r a e p p a l a c i s y h p s ’ r e t c a r a h

c , t heclothe sand also patr so fbody i n detalis .The

a s e b ir c s e d r o h t u a e h T . r e h t o n a y b n e e s s a r e t c a r a h c e h t d e ll a c s i y a w d n o c e s

m i h g n i b ir c s e d f o d a e t s n i s e y e d n a s n o i n i p o s ’ r e t c a r a h c r e h t o n a h g u o r h t r e t c a r a h c

t u a e h t , e r e H . h c e e p s s i y a w t x e N . y lt c e ri

d ho rgivesi nformaiton abou tacharacte r

(29)

t x e N . s r e t c a r a h c e h t g n i d n a t s r e d n u n i s r e d a e r e h t p l e h d l u o c e fi l t s a p s ’ r e t c a r a h c

a c r o h t u a e h T . s r e h t o f o n o it a s r e v n o c d e ll a c s i y a

w n give informaiton abou ta

n i y a w t x e n e h t s i n o it c a e R . s r e t c a r a h c r e h t o f o n o it a s r e v n o c e h t h g u o r h t r e t c a r a h c

s ’ r e t c a r a h c a w o n k s r e d a e r e h t s t e l r o h t u a e h T . s r e t c a r a h c e h t g n i d n a t s r e d n u

I . s t n e v e d n a s n o it a u ti s s u o ir a v o t n o it c a e r s i h h g u o r h t y ti l a n o s r e

p n letitng the

t c e ri d d n a n o it p ir c s e d t c e ri d e s u n a c r o h t u a e h t ,r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b a w o n k s r e d a e r

. s t n e m m o c t c e ri d d e ll a c y a w t x e n e h t s i s i h T . y ti l a n o s r e p s ’ r e t c a r a h c n o t n e m m o c

g n i k n i h t s i r e t c a r a h c a t a h w f o e g d e l w o n k t c e ri D . s t h g u o h t d e ll a c s i y a w t x e

N abou t

h g u o r h T . s m s ir e n n a m d e ll a c s i y a w t s a l e h T . s r e d a e r e h t o t n e v i g e b d l u o c

s r e d a e r e h t s ll e t r o h t u a e h t , s ti b a h d n a s m s ir e n n a m s ’ r e t c a r a h c a g n i b ir c s e d

. s r e t c a r a h c e h t t u o b a g n i h t e m o s

.

4 Famliy

’ e n o e m o s f o t r a p t n a tr o p m i t s o m e h t e b s y a w l a l li w y li m a

F slfie .The

s d n i k o w t e h t s e d u l c n i o s l a t I .t r a p s i h t n i d e s s u c s i d e b l li w y li m a f e h t f o n o it i n if e d

. y li m a f d e d n e t x e d n a r a e l c u n f o t s i s n o c h c i h w y li m a f f

o

.

a Meaningo fFamliy n

I thebook o fT he Famliy ,Burges sand Locke(1975 )deifned famliy a sa f

o p u o r

g person suntiedby ite so fblood ,marirageo radopiton ,consttiuitngasingle

l a i c o s e v it c e p s e r ri e h t n i r e h t o h c a e h ti w g n it a c i n u m m o c d n a g n it c a r e t n i d l o h e s u o h

, r e t s i s d n a r e h t o r b , r e t h g u a d d n a n o s , r e h t a f d n a r e h t o m , e fi w d n a d n a b s u h f o s e l o r

n it a e r c d n

a g and maintaining a common cutlure (p .8 .) A famliy i sthe main

. y li m a f m o r f d e e n c i s a b r i e h t t e g y e h t e s u a c e b n e r d li h c r o f r e v i g e r a

c A famliy i s

o s l

(30)

c i n u m m o c o t w o h d n a , t a

e atewtihotherf romt herif amliy .Aparen twillt eachand

. e r u t u f ri e h t r o f e r a p e r p d n a l l e w w o r g n a c y e h t t a h t o s n e r d li h c r i e h t e t a c u d e

c o L d n a s s e g r u

B k (e 1975 )also add fou rmain characteirsitcs o fa famliy

( .p )7 .The fris tcharacter i s t ha tafamliy consists o fperson sun tied by t he ite so f

. n o it p o d a r o d o o l b , e g a ir r a

m In thi scharacter ,blood descirbe sthe relaitonship

. n o it p o d a r o e g a ir r a m m o r f e m o c y a m n e r d li h C . n e r d li h c r i e h t d n a t n e r a p n e e w t e b

s u h a f o p i h s n o it a l e r e h t s e b ir c s e d d n o b , e r o m r e h tr u

F band and hi swfie .Second

d n a f o o r e n o r e d n u r e h t e g o t e v il y ll a u s u y li m a f e h t f o s r e b m e m e h t t a h t s i r e t c a r a h c

s e t u ti t s n o

c asinglehousehold.Theparen tandt hei rch lidrent endt o ilvet ogetheri n

o t e v a h y e h t n e h w l u f p l e h y r e v e b l li w t I . e s u o h e m a s e h

t communicateeach other .

r o ti n o m o t e m it h c u m e v a h l li w t n e r a p e h

T thedevelopmen to fthei rchlidren .The

t t a h t s i r e t c a r a h c d ri h

t he famliy i sauntiy of i nteracitng and i ntercommunicaitng

s n o s r e

p toperformthesocialr ole so fhusbandandwfie ,mothe randfather ,sonand

r e t h g u a

d ,brothe rands iste.rThereares omer olest ha texisti nours ocietyconnected

, e fi w d n a d n a b s u h f o e l o r l a i c o s e h t e b n a c t I . y li m a f a n i p i h s n o it a l e r e h t h ti w

r e t s i s d n a r e h t o r b r o r e t h g u a d d n a n o s , r e h t a f d n a r e h t o

m .Thel as tcharacte rist ha t

the famliy maintain sa common cutlure ,deirved mainly from the genera lcutlure ,

n i t u

b acomplexsocietypossessings omedisitncitvef eaturesf o reachf amliy .When

r e h t o h c a e o t e r u tl u c t n e r e f fi d g n ir b l li w y e h t , d e ir r a m s t e g e l p u o c

a based no thei r

y li m a f n w

o .Thesed fiferen tcutlureswli lmakesome unique featuresi n t hei rnew

. y li m a f

k c ir t a p z ti F d n a r e ll o N , n o it i d d a n

I (1993 )stated tha tthef ris tclas soff amliy

n o it i n if e

d i sbasedonf amliys rtucture ( .p 1 .9) Mos to fu suset het ermf amliyi nt wo

s y a w n o m m o

(31)

T . n o it a e r c o r p f o y li m a f d e ll a

c hesecond wayi swhen wemean relaitve sby blood

a , s t n u a , s t n e r a p d n a r g , s g n il b i s s a h c u s e g a ir r a m r

o nd cousins called famliy o f

g ir

o i .n Famliy o fo irgin i sachlidwhich comesf rom amarirageo facouplewhere

. n i e fi l s i h s n i g e b d li h c s i h

t Every person mus thave a mothe r and a father .

s i h T . e r o m y n a m d n a , s n i s u o c , t n u a , r e h t o r b r o r e t s i s e v a h y a m y e h t s e m it e m o S

f o d n i

k relaitonshipi susuallycalledfamliyo fprocreaiton.

.

b Kind so fFamliy

d e lt it n e k o o b e h t o t g n i d r o c c

A Sociology o fFamliy Lfie w irtten by David l

a e h

C (2002) ,the srtucture o fa famliy can be divided into nuclea rfamliy and

y li m a f d e d n e t x

e (p .172).

)

1 NuclearFamliy r o c c

A dingt oCheal (2002) ,nuclearf amliyi scomposedo fal egallymarired

e l p u o

c and t hei rchlidren,f o rasl ongast hel atte r ilved a thome( p .4) .There si no

y n a m d n a , t n u a , e l c n u , r e h t o m d n a r g , r e h t a f d n a r g s a h c u s y li m a f f o r e b m e m r e h t o

o h t a s e v il o h w e r o

m me .Thereareonly t heparen tand t hei rchlidren. In addiiton ,

k c ir t a p z ti F d n a r e ll o

N (1993 ) in the book enitlted Communica iton in Famliy p

i h s n o it a l e

R statet ha tnuclearf amliyi sr estirctedt o t hose ilving i nt hesamehouse

( .p 3 .) In t hi skind o ffamliy, the paren tand t hei rch lidren ilveseparated from t he

w e n r i e h t h ti w e v il d n a d e ir r a m n e r d li h c r i e h t y ll a n if l it n u e s u o h e n o n i y li m a f r e h t o

. y li m a

f Nuclea rfamliy i sestabilshed atfert he Wo lrd Wa rI Iand becomet hei dea l

t y t e i c o s r u o n i y li m a f f o l e d o

m oday .

)

2 ExtendedFamliy

. y li m a f d e d n e t x e d e ll a c s i y li m a f r a e l c u n f o e ti s o p p o e h

T According to

l a e h

C (2002) ,extended famliy consist so fa numbe ro fhousehold swhose male

( r o t s e c n a e l a m n o m m o c a m o r f t n e c s e d y b r e h t o n a e n o o t d e k n il e r e w s d a e

(32)

P n

I alesitne ,extendedf amliyi salsocalledhamula .Hamulai nPalesitneconsist so f

. e g a ll i v e m a s e h t n i e v il o h w s d l o h e s u o h l a r e v e

s Usually,t hehead o fthehamulai s

. e g a ll i v e h t n i n a m t s e d l o e h

t Today ,extendedf amliyi sarleadyspread outi nmany

ir t n u o

c es .Onef amliycan ilvewtiht herir elaitve ssuch a sgrandparent ,uncle ,aunt ,

. f o o r e n o n i r e h t e g o t e v il y e h T . c t e

.

5 Rela itonshipinaFamliy

r e h t o m f o g n i n a e m e h t : s tr a p o w t f o s t s i s n o c t r a p s i h

T -son r elaitonship and

r e h t o m n i t c il f n o c f o y r o e h t e h

t -son relaitonship .In t hefris tpar,t i tconsist soft he

n o d e s a b r e h t o m a f o e l o r t n a tr o p m

i Cheal .

.

a Mother-SonRela itonship l

a e h

C (2002 ) stated tha t motheirng i s a gendered identtiy which ha s

f o s e v il e h t n o s t c e f f e d n u o f o r

p women (p .102 .) Motheirng i sa kind o fsocia l

. s e it i v it c

a Thi skind o facitvtiystatr ssincehe rbabyi sborn untlit heendo fherl fie .

s a h r e h t o m

A dominatedrolesincet hebeginningo fhe rchlidren’sl fiebecauseshe

. s e o d r e h t a f a n a h t e r o m n e r d li h c f o e r a c e h t e v i

g tI i sno tonly raising achlid bu t

. ll e w p u w o r g l li w y e h t t a h t o s n e r d li h c g n ir a c d n a g n ir u tr u n s e v l o v n i t i o s l

a A

r e h t o

m interac tmoret ohe rchlidrenr athert hanaf ather .Shecanobserveandwatch

li h c r e h h ti w e m it e r o m s d n e p s e h s e s u a c e b n e r d li h c r e h f o t n e m p o l e v e d e h

t dren

. r e h t a f a n a h

t A motheri san i mpo tran t ifgurei n ch lidren’sl fie .She enjoy scairng

r i e h t o t g n i d n o p s e r d n a t n e m p o l e v e d s ’ n e r d li h c e h t g n i h c t a w y b n e r d li h c e h t r o f

t n e g r

u needs .Ther oleo fmothe rha sauniqueposiitonespeciallyi ni n lfuencingt he

(33)

r e tt e b a e v a h o t y ll a i c e p s e m i h r o f l u f p l e h e b l li w s i h T . lr i g a t a e rt o t w o h n o s

. e r u t u f e h t n i p i h s n o it a l e r

d u e r F o t g n i d r o c c

A (1990) ,al lmother swan tto be queen sto he rson s

( .p327 .)Amotheri st hef ris twomanf o rasonandi tcannotber eplaced byanyone .

h c a e t n a c r e h t o m A . tr a e h s i h m o r f k n i h t o t w o h n r a e l n a c n o s a , r e h t o m a h g u o r h T

. n a m e lt n e g a e b n a c e h t a h t o s l l e w l ri g a t a e rt o t w o h n o s

a A ciritca lphaseo fa

r e h t o

m -son r elaitonship come swhen anothe rwoman entersi ntohisl fieetihe ra sa

o t n i e m o c n a m o w r e h t o n a n e h w l u f r a e f l e e f l li w r e h t o m A . e fi w a s a r o d n e ir fl ri g

. e fi l s ’ n o s r e

h Shehast o sharet hel ovewtih someoneelse who i sasi mpo tran ta s

s ’ n o s r e

h lfie .Shef eelsworryi fhe rson willf orge the randl eaveher .Int hi sstage ,

d l u o h s r e h t o m A . n o s r e h o s l a d n a r e h t o m a m o r f g n i d n a t s r e d n u n a e b t s u m e r e h t

h ti w e fi l w e n s i h t r a t s d l u o h s e H . r e h h ti w e v il r e g n o l o n e b l li w n o s r e h t a h t e z il a e r

e m o w r e h t

o n t ha thel oves .Fu trhermore ,ason mus talso understandt ha t tii svery

o t r e h t o m a r o f d r a

h le the rsongof o rhi snewl fie . tIi sitmef o rasont oconveyhi s

t a h t r e h t o

m event houghhearleadyha sanewf amliy ,hewli lnotf orge the randhe r

l li w e v o

l n otber eplacedbyanyoneelse .

.

b Father-SonRela itonship tr e b o R o t g n i d r o c c

A (1982),f ather-sonr elaitonshipha samajori mpac tona

( t n e m p o l e v e d l a c i g o l o h c y s p s ’ n a

m p .187 .) A father-son relaitonship could help a

h t a f A . y ti n il u c s a m y h tl a e h a p o l e v e d y o

b e rcan help hi s son to develop hi s

o t n o it n e tt a y a p d l u o c r e h t a f A . n o s s i h o t n o it n e tt a l a i c e p s g n i v i g y b y ti n il u c s a m

a n i t i h a g n it t e g , m a x e d o o g a g n i n r a e : s e it i v it c a g n i w o ll o f e s e h t y b n o s e h t

t g n i o d y B . t c e j o r p k r o w a n o l l e w g n i o d r o , e m a g l l a b e s a

(34)

e m o s g n i o d y b , n o it i d d a n I . fl e s m i h o t e c n e d if n o c f o e s n e s a n o s s i h e s u o r a

d n e p s n a c y e h t e s u a c e b n o s s i h h ti w d n o b g n o rt s a e v a h r e h t a f a , r e h t e g o t s e it i v it c a

. r e h t o h c a e o t h c a e l e e f y e h t t a h w e r a h s d n a

d e lt it n e k o o b e h t n

I Famliyi nTransiiton,t herearet wo kind soff atherhood . a s i r e h t a f d o o g A . r e h t a f d a b d n a r e h t a f d o o g e h t e r a s d o o h r e h t a f f o s d n i k e s e h T

o t e l b a d n a e s i w , m r a w s i e H . y li m a f s i h t r o p p u s o t y t u d s i h l li fl u f n a c o h w r e h t a f

e r d li h c d n a e fi w s i h h ti w e m it d n e p

s ni nhi sspare itme.I nconrtast ,abadf atheri sa

t r o p p u s t o n n a c e H . y li m a f s i h r o f y t u d s i h l li fl u f o t g n il i a f r e h t a

f hi sfamliy a sa

t r e b o R . n o it n e tt a s i h t u o h ti w p u w o r g n e r d li h c s i h t e l e h n e h t r e n n i w d a e r

b (1982 )

e t a t s o s

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Detailed weather observations on local and regional levels are essential to a range of needs from forecasting tornadoes to making decisions that affect energy security, public

Selain itu, pada laman Data Referensi Peserta Didik , pengguna dapat melihat Publikasi data siswa aktif yang memiliki NISN sesuai tahun ajaran yang sedang berjalan. dan yang paling

memberikan rekomendasi kepada sekolah jika dalam proses audit terdapat temuuan baru atau temuan yang belum ditemukan oleh tim audit internal. Selanjutnya pihak

[r]

[r]

• Astronomi klasik India direkodkan dalam kesusasteraan dari zaman Maurya lagi (5 s.M) hingga Dinasti Mughal (16 M). • Teori-teori seperti Aryabhata,

[r]

Dalam konteks inilah Abdullah Saeed mengajukan tawaran pendekatan baru sebagai jembatan yang menghubungkan kebutuhan umat Islam pada abad 21 ini dengan pengembangan