• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

The effect of ICT based graphic organizer toward the students’ writing ability at the fourth semester of the English education study program at IAIN Palangka Raya - Digital Library IAIN Palangka Raya

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Membagikan "The effect of ICT based graphic organizer toward the students’ writing ability at the fourth semester of the English education study program at IAIN Palangka Raya - Digital Library IAIN Palangka Raya"

Copied!
23
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

ii

THE EFFECT OF ICT BASED GRAPHIC ORGANIZER TOWARD THE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY AT THE FOURTH SEMESTER

OF THE ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM AT IAIN PALANGKA RAYA

THESIS

Presented to the Department of Education of the Islamic Institute of Palangka Raya in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of

Sarjana Pendidikan Islam

Compiled by:

AISYAH HAFSHAH SAFFURA EL-MUSLIMAH

1201120749

STATE ISLAMIC INSTITUTE OF PALANGKA RAYA

FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND TEACHER TRAINING

LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM

(2)

iii

APPROVAL OF THE THESIS

Title of the thesis : THE EFFECT OF ICT BASED GRAPHIC ORGANIZER TOWARD THE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY AT THE FOURTH SEMESTER OF THE ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM AT IAIN PALANGKA RAYA

Name : AISYAH HAFSHAH SAFFURA EL-MUSLIMAH

SRN : 1201120749

Faculty : Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Department : Language Education

Study Program : English Education

Level : S-1

Palangka Raya, June 16, 2016 Approved by:

Advisor I, Advisor II,

M. ZainiMiftah, M.Pd. Sabarun, M.Pd

ORN. 197509152009121002 ORN.19680322 2008011005

The Vice Dean I of Academic, TheSecretaryof Language Education,

(3)

iv

PERSETUJUAN SEKRIPSI

JudulSekripsi : KEEFEKTIFAN GRAFIK ORGANISER BERBASIS ICT

TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MENULIS MAHASISWA

SEMESTEREMPAT PADA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS DI IAIN PALANGKA RAYA

Nama : AISYAH HAFSHAH SAFFURA EL-MUSLIMAH

NIM : 1201120749

Fakultas : TarbiyahdanIlmuKeguruan

Jurusan : PendidikanBahasa

Program Studi : PendidikanBahasaInggris

Jenjang : S-1

Palangka Raya, 16Juni 2016 Di setujuioleh :

Pembimbing I, Pembimbing II,

M. ZainiMiftah, M.Pd. Sabarun, M.Pd.

NIP. 197509152009121002 NIP.19680322 2008011005

Mengetahui,

Wakil Dekan I Bidang Akademik Sekertaris Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa

(4)

v

OFFICIAL NOTE

Case: Examination of Palangka Raya, June10,2016

AISYAH HAFSHAH SAFFURA’s Thesis

To the Dean of Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training of the State Islamic Instituteof Palangka Raya

In

Palangka Raya

Peace be unto the God’s Mercy and blessing as well,

By reading and analyzing the thesis’ revision, we think the thesis in the name of:

Name : AISYAH HAFSHAH SAFFURA

Student Registration Number : 1201120749 Title of the Thesis :

THE EFFECT OF ICT BASED GRAPHIC ORGANIZER TOWARD THE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY AT THE FOURTH SEMESTER OF THE ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM AT IAIN PALANGKA RAYA

Can be examined in partial Partial Fulfillment of the Degree ofSarjana Pendidikan Islam in English Education of the Department of Education State Islamic Institute of Palangka Raya.

Thank you for the attention.

Peace be with you and God’d blessing.

Advisor I, Advisor II,

M. Zaini Miftah, M.Pd. Hesty Widiastuty, M.Pd.

(5)

vi

NOTA DINAS

PERIHAL:PermohanandiseminarkanskripsisaudariPalangka Raya, 10Juni 2016 AISYAH HAFSHAH SAFFURA

EL-MUSLIMAH

Kepada. Yth. Dekan Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan

IAIN Palangka Raya di -

Palangka Raya

Puji syukur kehadirat Allah SWT atas segala karunia-Nya,

Setelah membaca dan menganalisa dari revisi skripsi yang telah disarankan. Maka kami memutuskan skripsi atas nama:

Nama : AISYAH HAFSHAH SAFFURA EL-MUSLIMAH

NIM : 1201120749

JudulSkripsi: KEEFEKTIFAN GRAFIK ORGANISER BERBASIS ICT

TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MENULIS MAHASISWA

SEMESTER EMPAT PADA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS DI IAIN PALANGKA RAYA

Dapat diseminarkan sebagai syarat memenuhi kewajiban dari pencapaian gelar Sarjana Pendidikan Islam pada program studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris dari jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa di Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya.

Terima Kasih atas perhatiannya,

Pembimbing I, Pembimbing II,

M. Zaini Miftah, M.Pd. Hesty Widiastuty, M.Pd.

(6)

vii

THE EFFECT OF ICT BASED GRAPHIC ORGANIZER TOWARD THE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY AT THE FOURTH SEMESTER

OF THE ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM AT IAIN PALANGKA RAYA

Abstract

The study attempts to (a) investigate whetherthe students taught using ICT Based graphic organizer get better achievement or not than those who taught without using ICT Based graphic organizer (Pattern Outline) at the fourth semester English Study Program students of Palangka Raya State Islamic Institute 2015/2016; (b) the area of contribution of ICT Based graphic organizer to help students in the writing process. The number of the subject is 21 students. The study belonged to experimental study by applying counterbalance procedure to collect the data. This study was restricted to two focuses: using ICT Based graphic organizer and using pattern outline in writing comparison and contrast essay. To answer the research problem, the t test for correlated samples and questionnaire were applied.

The research findings showed that, the t value was 10.185 and the df (Degree of freedom) of the distribution observed was 20. Based on the Table of t value, if df was 20, the 5% of significant level of t value was at 1.725 and the 1% of significant level of t value was at 2.086. It could be seen that the empiric t value at 10.185 was greater than the t value theoretic. It was said that at the 5% and 1% of significant level, there was a very significant difference on students’ writing score between the students who wrote a comparison and contrast essay using ICT Based GO (Mean= 3.44) and those who wrote a comparison and contrast essay using pattern outline (Mean= 2.58). It meant ICT Based GO gave very significant effect on the students’ writing score. Based on the result of questionnaire, it was concluded that most students had high positive response on the implementation of using graphic organizer in writing comparison and contrast essay (95.24%). Thestudents also felt excited with graphic organizer(85.71%). In addition, about 57.14% students felt fun when they wrote using graphic organizer. It could be stated that the area of GO helped the students in generating ideas (10 students or 47.62%), visualizing ideas (6 students or 28.57%), building sentences (4 students or 19.04%), and maintaining grammar (2 students or 9.52%).

Therefore, it is suggested that the writing teachers implement the ICT Based Graphic organizers in three stages of writing process: prewriting, whilst writing, and post writing. The use of ICT in learning English is strongly recommended in order to improve the quality of English learning. It is also strongly recommended that the students implement the ICT Based Graphic organizers in generating ideas, visualizing ideas, building sentences, and maintaining grammar when they were starting to write a comparison and contrast essay.

(7)

viii

KEEFEKTIFAN GRAFIK ORGANISER BERBASIS ICT TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MENULIS MAHASISWA

SEMESTER EMPAT PADA PROGRAM STUDI

PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS DI IAIN PALANGKA RAYA

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan (a) menginvestigasi apakah mahasiswa yang diajarkan menggunakan Grafik Organiser Berbasis ICT mendapat hasil yang lebih baik atau tidak daripada mereka yang diajarkan dengan menggunakan pola kerangka yang terstruktur pada mahasiswa semester empat program studi pendidikan bahasa Inggris di IAIN Palangka Raya tahun akademik 2015/2016. (b) mengetahui cakupan kontribusi dari Grafik Organiser Berbasis ICT dalam membantu mahasiswa pada proses menulis. Jumlah subjek dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 21 mahasiswa.

Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen dengan menerapkan prosedur counter balance. Pada penelitian ini, focus penelitian ditujukan pada: penggunaan Grafik Organiser Berbasis ICT dan penggunaan pola kerangka yang terstruktur dalam menulis karangan comparison and contrast. Untuk menganilis data penelitian, digunakan t-tes pada sampel berkorelasi dan angket.

Temuan penelitian menunjukan bahwa nilai t sebesar 10.185 dan df (derajat kebebasan) adalah 20. Selanjutnya nilai t dikomparasikan dengan t-tabel pada taraf siknifikansi 5% sebesar 1.725 dan 1% sebesar 2.086. Temuan penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa nilai t empiris sebesar 10.185 lebih besar dari nilai t teoritis pada taraf siknifikansi 5% dan 1%. Dengan demikian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa pada taraf siknifikansi 5% dan 1%, ada perbedaan yang sangat siknifikan pada nilai menulis mahasiswa antara yang menulis karangan comparison and contrast menggunakan Grafik Organiser Berbasis ICT (rata-rata = 3.44) dan yang menggunakan pola kerangka yang terstruktur (rata-rata=2.58). Ini dapat dikatakan bahwa Grafik Organiser Berbasis ICT telah member efek yang siknifikan terhadap nilai menulis mahasiswa. Dari hasil angket, dapat disimpulkan bahwa mahasiswa memberikan respon positif pada penerapan Grafik Organiser Berbasis ICT dalam menulis karangan comparison and contrast (95.24%). Mahasiswa juga merasa tertarik dengan grafik organizer (85.71%). Dan sebesar 57.14% mahasiswa merasa senang ketika mereka menulis dengan grafik organizer. Grafik Organiser dapat membantu mahasiswa proses menulis antara lain dalam hal: (1). menemukan ide (47.62%), menvisualisasi ide (28.57%), merangkai kalimat (19.04%), dan memperbaiki tata bahasa(9.52%).

Selanjutnya, disarankan dosen dan mahasiswa menerapkan Grafik Organiser Berbasis ICT dalam proses menulis.

Kata Kunci: Efektifitas, karangan comparison and contrast, grafik organizer

(8)

ix

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

In the name of Allah, the benefit and the Merciful. All praises and thanks are due to Allah. We praise Him and seek His assistance and His forgiveness. I bear witness that there is none worthy of worship except Allah, and that Muhammad is the last messenger of Allah.First of all, I would like to express my deepest thanks to:

1. Dr. IbnuElmi A.S. Pelu, SH, M.H., as the Rector of IAIN Palangka Raya 2. The Vice Dean I of Academic of IAIN Palangka RayaDra. Hj.

RodhatulJennah, M.Pd

3. The chairwoman of the Department of Language Education of IAIN Palangka Raya Dr. Hj. Hamidah, M.A,

4. The chairman of English study program of IAIN Palangka Raya M. ZainiMiftah,M.Pd.

5. My beloved advisors,M. ZainiMiftah, M.Pd. (as first Advisor)and Hesty Widiastuty, M.Pd. (as second advisor), for their ever-encouraging, supports, guidance, and sympathetic understanding.

6. My deepest thanks also go to the examiners Santi Erliana, M.Pd and Rahmadi Nirwanto, M.Pdfor their comments, advices, and suggestions that are profitable to the completion of the thesis. I truly realize that all their guidance is given for the sake of making this thesis more perfect.

7. I wish to express my most special gratitude to my beloved parents, Sabarun, M.Pd. and Indasah Abdul Karim, and my two sisters- TazkiyatunNafs El-Hawwa and AnnisaAsySyahidah for their counsel, supports, and continued patience. They have, indeed, been a source of motivation and spirit for me.

Palangka Raya, June 2016

(9)

x Dedication

This thesis is dedicate to:

I dedicate my thesis to my family. A special feeling of

gratitude to my patient loving parents

Sabarun, M.Pd

and

Indasah Abdul Karim

. My sisters

TazkiyatunNafs

El-Hawwa

and

Annisa Asy Syahidah

have never left my

side and very special to motivate me.

I dedicate this thesis and give special thanks to my

friends TBI 2012 who have supported me throughout the

(10)

xi

DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICATION

In the name of Allah SWT,

I declare that this thesis entitled THE EFFECT OF ICT BASED GRAPHIC ORGANIZER TOWARD THE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY AT THE

FOURTH SEMESTER OF THE ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY

PROGRAM AT IAIN PALANGKA RAYAis the result of my own research except as citedin the references.

Palangka Raya,June 16, 2016 My own declaration,

(11)

xii MOTTO

Pendapat seorang itu laksana benang

yang ditarik.

Pendapat dua orang laksana benang

yang diikatkan

Dan pendapat tiga orang seperti diikatkan

berkali-kali, nyaris tak ada kekurangan

(12)

xiii

LEGALIZATION OF THE THESIS EXAMINING COMMITTEE

This thesis entitled THE EFFECT OF ICT BASED GRAPHIC ORGANIZER TOWARD THE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY AT THE FOURTH SEMESTER OF THE ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM AT IAIN PALANGKA RAYA. In the name of AISYAH HAFSHAH SAFFURA

EL-MUSLIMAH and her Student Registration Number is 1201120749. It has been

examined by Team of Examiners of the English Education Study Program of English Department of Faculty ofTarbiyah and Teacher Training (FTIK) of the State Islamic Institute of Palangka Raya on:

Day : Thursday Date : June 16th 2016

Palangka Raya, June 16, 2016 Team of Exmainers

1. SantiErliana, M.Pd (...)

Chairwoman/Examiner

2. RahmadiNirwanto, M.Pd (...) Member

3. M. ZainiMiftah, M.Pd. (...) Member

4. Sabarun, M.Pd. (...) Secretary/Member

The State Islamic Institute of Palangka Raya The Dean of Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training,

(13)

xiv

PENGESAHAN

Skripsi yang berjudulTHE EFFECT OF ICT BASED GRAPHIC ORGANIZER TOWARD THE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY AT THE FOURTH SEMESTER OF THE ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM AT IAIN

PALANGKA RAYA. OlehAISYAH HAFSHAH SAFFURA EL-MUSLIMAH,

Nomor Induk Mahasiswa1201120749. Telah dimunaqasyahkan Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan (FTIK) Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya pada :

Hari : Kamis

Tanggal : 16 Juni 2016

Palangka Raya, 16 Juni 2016 Tim Penguji

3. Santi Erliana, M.Pd (...) Ketua Sidang/Penguji

4. Rahmadi Nirwanto, M.Pd (...)

Anggota/Penguji

3. M. ZainiMiftah, M.Pd. (...) Anggota/Penguji

4. Sabarun,M.Pd. (...) Sekretaris/Penguji

Dekan Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIN Palangka Raya,

Drs. Fahmi, M.Pd

(14)

xv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

COVER PAGE ...i

LIST OF THE APPROVAL ...ii

OFFICIAL NOTE ...iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS ...xiii

LIST OF TABLES ...xv

LIST OF FIGURES ...xvi

LIST OF APPENDICES ...xvii

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study ...1

B. The Problem of the Study ...9

C. Objective of the Study ...9

D. Hypotheses ...9

E. Variables of the Study ...10

F. Significance of the study ...10

G. Limitation of the Study ...11

H. Assumption ...12

I. Definition of Key Terms ... ...13

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE A. Related Studies ...15

B. Writing Skill ...18

1. Nature of Writing ...18

2. Kind of Writing ...19

3. The Problems of EFL in the teaching Writing ...31

4. The process of Writing ...35

5. Writing Assessment ...37

6. Teaching EFL Writing ...41

7. Approaches in Teaching Writing ...45

D. Comparison and Contrast Essay ...47

1. Definition of Comparison and contrast essay ...48

2. Organizational Patterns for the Comparison and contrast essay .49 3. The transitional signals used in comparison and contrast essay ..52

4. Comparison and contrast essay using graphic organizer ...52

5. Instructional Activities of using graphic organizer in teaching Comparison and contrast essay ...55

E. ICT Based Graphic organizer ...57

1. ICT in English Language Teaching and Learning ...58

(15)

xvi

3. The Graphic Organizer and Schema Theory ...62

4. The type graphic organizers ...63

5. The benefit of using Graphic Organizer ...72

6. The teaching of writing comparison and contrast essay using ICT Graphic Organizer ...73

CHAPTER III RESEARCH DESIGN A. Research Design ...75

B. Population and Sample ...76

C. The Research Instruments ...77

D. Instrumentation ...78

E. Data Collection Procedure ...84

F. Data Analysis Procedure ...89

G. Summary ...94

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION A. Data Presentation...96

1. The Students’ Writing Score in Pretest ...96

2. The Students’ Writing Score Using Pattern Outline ...98

3. The Students’ Writing Score Using ICT Based Graphic Organizer ...101

4. The Comparison Score Between ICT Based Graphic Organizer and Pattern outline ...103

5. The Result of Questionnaire...105

B. Research Findings ...108

1. Testing Normality and Homogeneity ...108

2. Testing hypotheses Using T test for paired sample ...109

3. Interpretation of the Results ...115

4. The the area of contribution of ICT based graphic organizer to the students in the writing process. ...115

C. Discussion ...117

1. The Students’ Progress of Writing Scores: Using ICT based Graphic Organizer Versus Using Pattern Outline ...117

2. The the area of contribution of ICT based graphic organizer to the students in the writing process. ...121

CHAPTER V CONCLUSSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS A. Conclusions ...123

B. Suggestions ...124

1. For the teachers ...124

2. For the students ...124

3. For Next Researchers ...125 REFERENCES

APPENDICES

(16)

xvii

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1 the Structure of an Essay ... 23

Table 2.2 the Composing Behaviors of EFL Writer ... 33

Table 2.3. Scoring Guide ... 40

Table. 2.4 Purpose and Examples of comparison and contrast essay ... 48

Table. 2.5. There are two ways to organize a comparison/contrast essay ... 50

Table 2.6. Point-by-Point Approach table ... 51

Table 2.7. The transitional signals used in comparison and contrast essay ... 51

Table 3.1. Scoring Guide for Try Out ... 79

Table 3.2 Correlations ... 83

Table 3.3 Inter-rater Coefficient Correlation and Interpretation ... 84

Table 3.4 The Procedure of Essay Writing Test ... 88

Table 3.5 The Source of data, instruments, and data needed ... 89

Table 4.1 The Students’ Writing Score in Pretest ... 97

Table 4.2 The Students’ Writing Score Using Pattern Outline ... 99

Table 4.3The Students’ Writing Score Using ICT Based Graphic Organizers .. 101

Table 4.4. The Comparison Score between ICT Based GO Pattern outline ... 103

Table 4.5 The students writing score between using GO and Pattern Outline ... 103

Table 4.6. The Comparison Improvement Score between using GO and Pattern Outline ... 104

Table 4.7The result of students’ response on the implementation of using ICT Based Graphic Organizer in writing Comparison and Contrast Essay ... 106

Table 4.8 Test of Normality ... 109

Table 4.9 Test of Homogeneity of Variances ... 109

Table 4.10 Table of Different score ... 111

(17)

xviii

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2.1 Model Graphic Organizer for Illustration Essay ... 65

Figure 2.2 Model Graphic Organizer for Classification Essay ... 67

Figure 2.3 Model of Graphic Organizer in Process Essay ... 69

Figure 2.4 Model of Graphic Organizer in CauseAnd Effect Essay ... 71

Figure 3.1 Steps in Collecting and Analyzing Data, and Testing Hypothesis ... 93

Figure 4.1 The frequency distribution of the students’ writing score in pretest. ... 98

Figure 4.2 The frequency distribution of the students’ writing score using pattern outline. ... 100

Figure 4.3 The frequency distribution of the students’ writing score using ICT based Graphic Organizer ... 102

Figure. 4.4 Distribution of students’ writing score using GO and pattern outline. ... 104

(18)

xix

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix 1Research Schedule Appendix 2 Research Instrument Appendix 3 Lesson Plan

Appendix 4 The Implementation of Using ICT based Graphic Organizers (GO) in writing comparison and contrast essay.

Appendix 5 the result of analyses from the test

Appendix6 The Result Questionnaire the use of ICT based GO in writing Appendix 7 Compare and Contrast Essay Checklist

(19)

xx

REFERENCES

Ann, Raimes. Techniques in Teaching Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1983.

Ary. Donald et, al. Introduction to Research in Education.(eighth edition).(United States: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010.

Ausebel, D.P., Noval, J.D., &Hanesian, H. 1978. Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Baxendell, B. The Considerations Packet Graphic Organizers: Guiding Principles and Effective Practice prepared by To order this packet, visit our website at www.wm.edu/ttac and click on the “Considerations Packets” link. July 2003. Brown, H.D. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language

Pedagogy. Fourth Edition. White Plains, N Y: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. 2000.

Bruner, J.S. Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1966.

Byrne, D. Teaching Writing Skills. London: Longman, Inc. 1981.

Calderonello, & Edwards, L. Bruce, Rough drafts: The Process of Writing, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. 1986.

D’Angelo, F. J. Process and Thought in Composition with Handbook. Massachusetts: Winthrop Publisher, Inc. 1980.

Delrose, L. N. Investigating the Use of Graphic organizer For Writing. Unpublished Thesis: Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College. B.A., University of California Santa Barbara. 2011.

Dunston, P.J. A Critique of graphic organizer research. Reading Research and Instruction. 31(2). 1992.

Dye, G. A. Graphic organizers to the rescue! Helping students link and remember information. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(3). 2000.

Edward L.V. & Asher, J. W. Educational Research.Second Edition. New Jersey: Merril of Prentice Hall, Inc. 1983.

Egan, M. Reflections on effective use of graphic organizers. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 42(8). 1999.

Ellis, E. 2004. What’s the big deal about GO? Retrieved on January 23rd, 2010, from http://graphicorganizer.com.

Eschholz, P. & Rosa, A. Subject and Strategy: A Rhetoric Readers. (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993.

Ezor, E. and J. Lewis, From Paragraph to Essay: A Process Approach for Beginning College Writing, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc, 1984.

(20)

xxi

Gay, L.R. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis & Application. Second Edition. Toronto: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company, 1981.

Gebhard, J.G. Teaching English as a Foreign or Second Language: A Teacher Self-Development and Methodology Guide. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. 2000.

Ghaith, G. The Nature of The Writing Process, 2002, (online) URL: http://nadabs.tripod.com/ghaith-writing, (accessed on April 14, 2015).

Gould, E., DiYanni, R. & Smith, W. The Act of Writing. New York: Random House. 1989.

Hellriegel, et.al..Organizational Behavior. (Ohio: South Western College Publishing, 1998.

Hopkins, C.D. & Richard, L.A. Classroom Measurement and Evaluation. Illinois: F.E. Peacock Publishers, Inc., 1990.

Hyland, K. Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2003.

International Journal of English language Teaching Vol.3, No.1, pp.11-31, March 2015.

Irawati, L. Lestari, and Wahyuni. Implementasi sandwich graphic organizer untukmeningkatkankemampuanmenuliseseimahasiswa semester III. Published

date: 24 Oct 2015. JurnalPenelitian LPPM

(LembagaPenelitiandanPengabdiankepadaMasyarakat)IKIP PGR IMADIUN Vol 2, No 1 (2014).

Latief, A, Reliability of Language Skills Assessment

Results.JurnalIlmuPendidikanVIII No 3, 214-224, 2001.

Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., &Tapangco, L. When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1). 1996.

McCrimmon, J. M, Writing with a Purpose, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1984.

McElroy, L. T., & Coughlin, C. N. The other side of the story: Using graphic organizer as cognitive learning tools to teach students to construct effective counter-analysis. Unpublished thesis University of Baltimore Law Review. 2009.

Meyen, E.L., Vergason, G. A. & Whelan, R. J. Strategies for teaching exceptional children in inclusive settings. 1996.

Millet, C. The effectiveness of graphic organizers in basal reading instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana. 2000.

Nunan, D. Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1992.

(21)

xxii

O’Malley, J.M. & Valdez, P.L, Authentic Assessment for English Language Learners: Practical Approaches for Teachers, Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. 1996.

Oshima, A &Hoque, A. Writing Academic English. Third Edition. White Plains N Y: Addison Wesley Longman. 1999.

Prinzessinnadia. February 1, 2013 . IctIn English Language Teaching And Learning. Online URL:https://Prinzessinnadia.Wordpress.Com/2013 /02/01/Ict-In-English-Language-Teaching- And-Learning/ Accessed on November 11. 20:58.

Purwoningsih, T.. Improving students’ vocabulary mastery trough Graphic organizer (An action research at fifth grade of SD NegeriKentingan No. 79 Surakarta in academic year 2010/2011. Unpublished: English department teacher training and education faculty sebelasmaret university of Surakarta. 2011.

Raimes, A. Techniques in Teaching Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1983. Regina L. Smalley and Mary K. Ruetten. Refining Composition Skills: Rhetoric and

Grammar for ESL Students. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. 2001.

Sabarun. Fundamental of Writing. Unpublished Malang: UniversitasMuhammadiyah Malang. , 2003.

Sekaran, U. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1992.

Sharrock, T. The Effect of Graphic organizer on Students’ Writing. Graphic

organizer And Students’ Writing. Action Research. July, 2008. Kennesaw State

University. 2008.

Tayib, A. M. The Effect of Using Graphic organizer on Writing (A Case Study of Preparatory College Students At Umm-Al-Qura University). International Journal of English Language Teaching. Vol.3, No.1, Pp.11-31, March 2015. Published By European Centre For Research Training And Development Uk (Www.Eajournals.Org). 2015.

Tompkins, G.E. Teaching Writing: Balancing Process and Product, (New York: Macmillan, Inc, 1994.

Trimmer, J.F. and Sommer, N.I. Writing with a Purpose, Lawrenceville: Houghton Mifflin Company. 1984.

Vacca, R.T., &Vacca, J.L. Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum. New York: Longman. 1999.

Vockell, E. L. & J. Asher, William Educational Research.Second Edition.( New Jersey: Merril of Prentice Hall, Inc. 1983.

Weigle, S.C. Assessing Writing. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Winkle, Anthony C. and Jo Roy McCuen. Writing the Research Paper. Orlando:

(22)

xxiii

(23)

xxiv

CURRICULUM VITAE

AISYAH HAFSHAH SAFFURA

EL-MUSLIMAH was borninPasuruan as

the second daugter from her

parents Sabarun, M.Pd and Indasah

Abdul Karim, East Java on

December 26, 1993. Shecompleted

her education from primary to high

school in her hometown,

Pasuruan.She graduated from kindergarten TK Dharma WanitaDermo I in

2000. Then, shecontinued her study to State Elementary School 2 Dermo

Bangiland then she graduated from the school in 2006. Then, she

entered the State standard national of Junior High School IIIBangil, in

2009. In 2012, she was accepted at International school of State

Senior High School 1 Bangil, she took Language Program at Senior

High School 1 Bangil and finished her study in 2012. She then

continued to English study program atdepartment of language

education in the State Islamic Institute of PalangkaRaya, CentralBorneo,

in 2012. She completed her Sarjana Degree of English Study Program

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Sebagaimana kita ketahui bahwa perusahaan alfamaret dan indomaret serta J.Co dan Dungking donut’s menjual produk atau barang yang sama, disinalah penulis untuk

Laporan keuangan yang merupakan hasil dari kegiatan operasi normal perusahaan akan memberikan informasi keuangan yang berguna bagi entitas-entitas di dalam

Robert Ang (1997) dalam Abigael K dan Ika S (2008:78), menyatakan bahwa semakin besar ROA, maka semakin baik karena tingkat keuntungan yang dihasilkan perusahaan

Kebutuhan air untuk tanaman padi adalah 150 mm per bulan sedangkan untuk tanaman palawija adalah 70 mm/bulan, dengan asumsi bahwa peluang terjadinya hujan yang

Mutasi kromosom yang terjadi karena perubahan jumlah kromosom (ploid) melibatkan kehilangan atau penambahan perangkat kromosom (genom) disebut euploid,

Oleh karena itu, hendaknya ini mampu menjadi sarana dalam pengembangan pemahaman SAK ETAP tidak hanya pada pelaku usaha jasa maupun dagang, namun bagi pelaku usaha manufaktur

15.Kebijakan Akuntansi atas Pengakuan Persediaan, Belanja Yang Masih Harus Dibayar, Piutang, Pendapatan LO, Aset Tetap dengan Dokumen Sumber Pendukungnya Belum

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui faktor – faktor apa saja yang dapat mempengaruhi kebutuhan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan Entitas Tanpa Akuntabilitas Publik (SAK ETAP) bagi