DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1.
Gebreabiezgi Teklebirhan, Adane Bitew. Prevalence of Dermatophytic
Infection and the Spectrum of Dermatophytes in Patients Attending a Tertiary
Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
International Journal of Microbiology
.
2015.
2.
Maria da Gloria, Santana GB, Criado PR, et al. Chronic widespread
dermatophytosis due to
Trichophyton rubrum
: a syndrome associated with a
Trichophyton
-specific functional defect of phagocytes.
Front Microbiol
.2015.
3.
Hidayati Afif Nurul, dkk. Mikosis Superfisialis di Divisi Mikologi Unit Rawat
Jalan Penyakit Kulit dan Kelamin RSUD Dr. Soetomo Surabaya Tahun
2003-2005.
Berkala Ilmu Kesehatan Kulit dan Kelamin.
2009.
4.
Havlickova Blanka, A.Czaika Victor, Friedrich markus. Epidemiological
trends in skin mycoses worldwide. Blackwell publishing Ltd Mycoses. 2008
5.
Ilkit M, Durdu M. Tinea pedis: the etiology and global epidemiology of a
common fungal infection.
Critical Riviews in Microbiology.
2015.
6.
Bell-Syer SE, Khan SM. Torgerson DJ. Oral treatments for fungal infections of
the skin of the foot. 2012
7.
Perdoski. Dermatofitosis Superfisialis. Jakarta: balai penerbit FKUI 2001
8.
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1091684-overview#a6
Akses
29
9.
Vikas Kumar, Ragini Tilak1, Pradyot Prakash, Chaitanya Nigam, Richa Gupta.
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences 2 (2011) 134-138 Tinea Pedis
–
an Update
10.
http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/magazines/allwoman/Myths-surrounding-athlete-s-foot-_16490106 Akses 20 Januari
11.
Wolff Klaus Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology In General Medicine Seventh Edition
Volume Two . New York: Mc Graw Hill Medical,2008.
12.
http://www.bpac.org.nz/BPJ/2014/December/docs/BPJ65-tinea-pedis.pdf
Akses 30 November
13.
http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/athletes-foot/basics/definition/con-20014892 Akses 30 November
14.
.http://www.dermnetnz.org/fungal/tinea-pedis.html Akses 1Desember
15.
Gino A
Epidemiology of dermatophytoses: retrospective analysis from 2005
to
2010
and
comparison
with
previous
data
from
1975.
NEWMICROBIOLOGICA, 35, 207-213, 2012
16.
Burns Toni, et al. Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology
Volume 2.Wiley
Blackwell ;2012
17.
Carlo CJ, Bowe MD. Tinea Pedis (Athlete’s Foot) [pamphlet]. (USA); 2012.
18.
http://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/123456789/17887/5/Chapter%20I.pdf
Akses 30 November
20.
W.J.S Poerwadarmita.Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia.Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
1996
21.
Djajusman H.S. Polisi dan Lalu Lintas. Bandung: Mabak. 1976 :8
22.
Elder, David. Lever’s
Histopathology of The Skin Tenth Edition.
Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2009.
23.
Wolff, klaus. Fitzpatrick’s Color Atlas and Synopsis of Clinical Dermatology
Seventh Edition. New York: Mc. Graw Hill,2013
24.
Zhou Z, Liu T, Zhang Z. Skin Disease in United Nations Peacekeepers in
Lebanon.
J. R. Army Med Corps
. 2016
25.
Baihaqy Muhammad. Prevalensi dan Faktor Risiko Terjadinya Tinea Pedis
pada Pekerja Pabrik Tekstil. Semarang : Universitas Diponegoro; 2014
26.
Mustofa Ahmad. Prevalensi dan Faktor Risiko Terjadinya Pityriasis
Versicolor pada Polisi Lalu Lintas Kota Semarang. Semarang : Universitas
Diponegoro ; 2014
27.
Matricciani Lisa, Jones Sara. Treating Tinea Pedis in Patients with Diabetes.
Lampiran 3. Kuesioner penelitian
KUESIONER PENELITIAN
HIGIENE PERORANGAN TERHADAP
TINEA PEDIS
Keterangan Responden
1.
Nomor
:
2.
Tanggal pemeriksaan
:
3.
Petugas pemeriksa
:
Identitas Responden
1.
Nama
:
2.
Jenis Kelamin
:
3.
Umur
:
4.
Pangkat
:
5.
Satuan Kepolisian
:
6.
Mulai bekerja di kepolisian :
7.
Nomer HP
:
8.
Apakah anda pernah mendapatkan terapi tinea pedis (kutu air) pada 1
bulan terakhir?
a.
Ya
b.
Tidak
Petunjuk Pengisian : Berilah tanda silang (X) pada jawaban yang anda pilih
I.
Kebersian Umum
1.
Berapa kali anda mandi setiap harinya?
Skor
a.
Dua kali atau lebih
(1)
2.
Apakah anda mandi selalu memakai sabun mandi?
a.
Ya
(1)
b.
Tidak
(0)
3.
Apakah sabun yang anda gunakan adalah sabun antiseptik?
a.
Ya
(1)
b.
Tidak
(0)
4.
Bagaimana penggunaan handuk yang anda pakai?
a.
Digunakan sendiri
(1)
b.
Digunakan untuk banyak orang/bergantian
(0)
5.
Berapa seringkah anda mengganti handuk anda?
a.
3 hari sekali
(1)
b.
5 hari sekali
(0)
6.
Apakah anda mencuci kaki dan mengeringkannya setelah beraktivitas?
a.
Ya
(1)
b.
Tidak
(0)
7.
Apakah saat mandi anda menggosok dan membersihkan sela-sela jari kaki,
tumit, dan area kaki?
a.
Ya
(1)
b.
Tidak
(0)
II.
Kebersihan yang terkait pekerjaan
1.
Berapa seringkah anda mengganti kaos kaki anda?
a.
Setiap hari
(1)
b.
Dua hari sekali atau lebih
(0)
2.
Jika sepatu dan kaos kaki anda tidak langsung dicuci, bagaimanakah anda
menyimpan benda tersebut?
a.
Diletakkan di tempat yang terkena sinar matahari langsung
(1)
b.
Diletakkan di tempat yang tidak terkena sinar matahari
(0)
3.
Berapa jam dalam sehari anda memakai sepatu?
a.
Kurang dari 8 jam
(1)
III.
Durasi mengatur lalu lintas
1.
Berapa lama durasi anda mengatur lalu lintas?
a.
< 4 jam
(1)
Lampiran 4. Hasil Analisis
Analisis Univariat
Coordi nates of the Curve
Test Result Variable(s): Umur
20.00 1.000 1.000
22.00 1.000 .824
25.00 1.000 .765
27.50 .958 .765
28.50 .833 .706
29.50 .792 .647
30.50 .625 .647
31.50 .625 .529
32.50 .583 .412
34.00 .458 .412
36.00 .417 .412
38.50 .333 .412
40.50 .333 .353
41.50 .292 .294
43.00 .250 .235
44.50 .208 .235
45.50 .208 .176
47.00 .208 .118
49.00 .167 .118
51.00 .125 .118
52.50 .083 .059
54.00 .042 .000
56.00 .000 .000
Positiv e if Greater Than
or Equal Toa Sensitiv ity 1 - Specif icity
The test result v ariable(s): Umur has at least one tie between t he posit iv e actual state group and t he negat iv e actual state group.
The smallest cutof f v alue is the minimum
Coordi nates of the Curve
Test Result Variable(s): Lama bekerja
.00 1.000 1.000
1.50 1.000 .882
2.50 1.000 .824
6.00 1.000 .765
9.50 .917 .706
10.50 .833 .647
11.50 .708 .588
12.50 .583 .471
13.50 .542 .412
15.00 .458 .412
16.50 .417 .412
18.00 .333 .412
19.50 .333 .294
21.00 .292 .294
22.50 .167 .294
23.50 .125 .294
25.00 .125 .235
27.00 .125 .118
28.50 .083 .118
30.50 .083 .059
32.50 .042 .059
33.50 .042 .000
35.00 .000 .000
Positiv e if Greater Than
or Equal Toa Sensitiv ity 1 - Specif icity
The test result v ariable(s): Lama bekerja has at least one tie between the posit iv e actual state group and t he negativ e actual state group.
The smallest cutof f v alue is the minimum
3.
ROC Higiene
Coordi nates of the Curve
Test Result Variable(s): HIgiena
2.00 1.000 1.000
3.50 .958 1.000
4.50 .958 .882
5.50 .917 .824
6.50 .833 .647
7.50 .583 .294
8.50 .333 .176
9.50 .125 .000
11.00 .000 .000
Positiv e if Greater Than
or Equal Toa Sensitiv ity 1 - Specif icity
The test result v ariable(s): HIgiena has at least one tie between t he posit iv e actual state group and t he negat iv e actual state group.
The smallest cutof f v alue is the minimum
Analisis Bivariat
1.
Kategori Lama bekerja
Crosstab
4 0 4
1.7 2.3 4.0
23.5% .0% 9.8%
13 24 37
15.3 21.7 37.0
76.5% 100.0% 90.2%
17 24 41
17.0 24.0 41.0
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count
Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count
Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis < 6
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1. 66.
b.
Risk Estimate
2.846 1.837 4.410
41 For cohort Tinea
pedis = positif N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
2.
Kategori durasi mengatur lalu lintas
3.
Kategori higiena
Crosstab
10 11 21
8.7 12.3 21.0
58.8% 45.8% 51.2%
7 13 20
8.3 11.7 20.0
41.2% 54.2% 48.8%
17 24 41
17.0 24.0 41.0
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count
Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count
Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis < 4 jam
>= 4 jam Durasi mengatur
lalu lintas
Total
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8. 29.
b.
Risk Esti mate
1.688 .481 5.929
1.361 .645 2.871
.806 .479 1.355
41 Odds Rat io f or Durasi
mengatur lalu lintas (< 4 jam / >= 4 jam) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif
For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif
N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
Crosstab
12 10 22
9.1 12.9 22.0
70.6% 41.7% 53.7%
5 14 19
7.9 11.1 19.0
29.4% 58.3% 46.3%
17 24 41
17.0 24.0 41.0
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count
Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis Count
Expected Count % wit hin Tinea pedis < 7,5
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7. 88.
Kategori penggunaan sabun anti septik
Risk Esti mate
3.360 .896 12.600
2.073 .892 4.818
.617 .363 1.049
41 Odds Rat io f or HIgiena
(< 7,5 / >= 7,5) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif
For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif
N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al
Crosstab
8 2 10
47.1% 8.3% 24.4%
9 22 31
52.9% 91.7% 75.6%
17 24 41
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Tidak
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
1 cells (25.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4. 15.
Kategori penggunaan handuk
Risk Esti mate
9.778 1.729 55.304
2.756 1.465 5.182
.282 .080 .993
41 Odds Rat io f or sabun
antiseptik (Tidak / Y a) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif
For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif
N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al
Crosstab
2 0 2
11.8% .0% 4.9%
15 24 39
88.2% 100.0% 95.1%
17 24 41
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis digunakan bany ak orang
digunakan sendiri pemggunaan
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is . 83.
Kategori frekuensi mengganti handuk
Risk Estimate
2.600 1.748 3.867
41 For cohort Tinea
pedis = positif N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al
Crosstab
9 10 19
52.9% 41.7% 46.3%
8 14 22
47.1% 58.3% 53.7%
17 24 41
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis 5 hari sekali
3 hari sekali mengganti
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7. 88.
Kategori mencuci kaki setelah aktivitas
Risk Esti mate
1.575 .451 5.504
1.303 .629 2.698
.827 .486 1.406
41 Odds Rat io f or mengganti
handuk (5 hari sekali / 3 hari sekali)
For cohort Tinea pedis = positif
For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif
N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al
Crosstab
3 6 9
17.6% 25.0% 22.0%
14 18 32
82.4% 75.0% 78.0%
17 24 41
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Tidak
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
1 cells (25.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3. 73.
Kategori menggosok dan membersihkan daerah kaki
Risk Esti mate
.643 .136 3.035
.762 .279 2.079
1.185 .681 2.062
41 Odds Rat io f or mencuci
kaki (Tidak / Y a) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif
For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif
N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al
Crosstab
3 3 6
17.6% 12.5% 14.6%
14 21 35
82.4% 87.5% 85.4%
17 24 41
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Tidak
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2. 49.
Kategori mengganti kaos kaki
Risk Esti mate
1.500 .264 8.523
1.250 .510 3.066
.833 .358 1.939
41 Odds Rat io f or
membersihkan daerah kaki (Tidak / Y a) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif
For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif
N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al
Crosstab
11 10 21
64.7% 41.7% 51.2%
6 14 20
35.3% 58.3% 48.8%
17 24 41
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis 2 hari sekali atau lebih
setiap hari f rekuensi ganti
kaos kaki
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8. 29.
Kategori penyimpanan sepatu
Risk Esti mate
2.567 .711 9.266
1.746 .797 3.824
.680 .399 1.159
41 Odds Rat io f or
f rekuensi ganti kaos kaki (2 hari sekali atau lebih / setiap hari) For cohort Tinea pedis = positif
For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif
N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al
Crosstab
5 11 16
29.4% 45.8% 39.0%
12 13 25
70.6% 54.2% 61.0%
17 24 41
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis tidak terkena sinar
matahari
terkena sinar matahari peny impanan
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6. 63.
Kategori lama memakai sepatu
Risk Esti mate
.492 .132 1.837
.651 .283 1.498
1.322 .801 2.182
41 Odds Rat io f or
peny impanan sepatu (tidak terkena sinar matahari / t erkena sinar matahari) For cohort Tinea pedis = posit if For cohort Tinea pedis = negatif N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
95% Conf idence Interv al
Crosstab
17 21 38
100.0% 87.5% 92.7%
0 3 3
.0% 12.5% 7.3%
17 24 41
100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis Count
% wit hin Tinea pedis > 8 jam
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear
Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.
2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1. 24.
Risk Estimate
.553 .415 .736
41 For cohort Tinea
pedis = negat if N of Valid Cases
Value Lower Upper
