• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Hubungan Antara Simetrisitas Kondilus Dan Pola Pertumbuhan Vertikal Wajah Pada Pasien Ortodonsia Di RSGMP FKG USU

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Hubungan Antara Simetrisitas Kondilus Dan Pola Pertumbuhan Vertikal Wajah Pada Pasien Ortodonsia Di RSGMP FKG USU"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

38

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Ramirez- Yanez GO, Stewart A, Franken E, Campos K. Prevalence of mandibular asymmetries in growing patients. Eur J of Orthod 2011; 16 (4): 236 42.

2. Sezgin OS, Celenk P, Arici S. Mandibular asymmetry in different occlusion patterns. Angle Orthod 2007; 77(5); 803-7.

3. Choi KY. Analysis of facial asymmetry. Arch Craniofac Surg 2015; 16(1): 1-10.

4. Bishara S, Burkey PS, Kharouf JG. Dental and facial asymmetries: A review. The Angle Orthod 1994; 64(2): 89-98.

5. Maheshwari S, Verma SK, Gaur A, Dhiman S. Diagnosis and management of facial asymmetries. J of Orthod Res 2015; 3(2): 81-7.

6. Mishra H, Shivaprakash G, Maurya RK. Assessment of facial asymmetry in various malocclusions: A comparative analysis. The Journal of Indian Orthod Soc 2014; 48(4): 537-45.

7. Thiesen G, Gribel BF, Freitas MPM. Facial asymmetry: a current review. Dent Press J Orthod 2015; 20(6):110-24.

8. Cheong YW, Lo LJ. Facial asymmetry: etiology, evaluation and management. Chang Gung Med J 2011; 34(4): 341- 51.

9. Rhodes G, Sumich A, Byatt G. Are average facial configuration attractive only because of their symmetry? Psychol Sci 1999; 10(1): 52-8.

10. Agrawal A, Agrawal P, Bagga DK. An evaluation of panoramic radiograph to assess mandibular asymmetry as compared to posterioranterior cephalogram. APOS Trends Orthod 2015; 5: 197- 201

11. Brustone CJ. Diagnosis and treatment planning of patients with asymmetries. Senim Orthod 1996; 4(3): 153-64.

12. Nanda R, Margolis MJ. Treatment strategies for midline discrepancies. Senim Orthod 1996; 2(2): 84-9.

(2)

39

13. Severt TR, Profitt WR. The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population of North Carolina. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1997; 12(3).

14. Haraguchi S, Takada K, Yasuda Y. Facial asymmetry in subjects with skeletal class III deformity. Angle Orthod 2002; 72(1): 28-35.

15. Lin H, Zhu P, Lin Y dkk. Mandibular asymmetry: A three- dimensional quantification of bilateral condyle. Head and Face Medicine 2013; 9: 1-7.

16. Westesson Pl, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW, Guay JA. Radiographic assessment of asymmetry of the mandible. Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15: 991- 9.

17. Chia MSY, Naini FB, Gill D. The aetiology, diagnosis and management of mandibular asymmetry. Orthod Update 2008.

18. Taki AA, Ahmed MH, Ghani HA, Kadah FA. Impact of different malocclusion types on the vertical mandibular asymmetry in young adult sample. Eur J Dent 2015; 9: 373-7.

19. Celik S, Celikoglu M, Buyuk SK, Sekerci AE. Mandibular vertical asymmetry in adult orthodontic patients with different vertical growth patterns: A cone beam computed tomography study. Angle Ortod 2016; 86(2): 271-7.

20. Anison JJ, Rajasekar L, Ragavendra B. Understanding asymmetry-a review. Bio and Pharm J 2015; 8: 659-68.

21. Oshagh M, Shadidi S, Najafi HZ, et al. Panoramic radiography: a tool for evaluation of orthodontic patient’s sagital and vertical skeletal relations. Galen Med J 2014; 3 (1) : 29-38.

22. Ongkosuwito EM, Dieleman MMJ, Jagtman AMK, et al. Linear mandibular measurements: comparison between orthopantomograms and lateral cephalograms. Cleft Palate – Craniofac J 2009; 46 (2): 147- 53.

23. Silvestrini- Biavati F, Ugolini A, Laffi N, Canevello C, Silvestrini- Biavati S. Early diagnostic evalution of mandibular asymmetry using orthopantomogram. India J Dent Res 2014; 25(2): 154-9.

(3)

40

24. Habets LLMH, Bezuur JN, Naeiji M, Hansson TL. The orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems. II. The vertical symmetry. J Oral Rehabil 1988; 15: 465-71.

25. Kjellberg H, Ekestubbe A, Kiliaridis S, Thilander B. Condylar height on panoramic radiographs: A methodologic study with a clinical application. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52: 43-50.

26. Van Elslande DC, Russett SJ, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Mandibular asymmetry diagnosis with panoramic imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134 (2): 183-92.

27. Chen F, Terada K, Wu L, Saito I. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base width in class III malocclusions with low, average and high MP-SN angles. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77(1): 397-403.

28. Bhalajhi SI. Orthodontics: the arts and science. 5th ed. New Delhi: Arya

Publishing House, 2009: 187-8, 205.

29. Singh G. Textbook of orthodontics. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers

Medical Publishers, 2007: 115-6.

30. Jacobson A, Jacobson RL. Radiographic cephalometry from basics to 3-D imaging. 2nded. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co, 2006: 65-74.

31. Chung CH, Mongiovi VD. Craniofacial growth in untreated class I subjects with low, average and high MP-SN angles. A longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 170-8.

32. Karlsen AT. Craniofacial growth differences between low and high MP-SN angle males: a longitudinal study. Angle Orthodont. 1995; 65(5): 341-350.

33. Lemos AD, Katz CRT, Heimer MV, Rosenbatt A. Mandibular asymmetry: A proposal of radiographic analysis with public domain software. Dental Press J Orthod 2014 May-June; 19(3): 52-8.

34. Purbiati M, Purwanegara MK, Kusdhany L, Himawan LS. Prediction of mandibulofacial asymmetry using risk factor index and model of dentocraniofacial morphological pattern. J Int Dent Med Res 2016; 9 (3): 195-201.

(4)

41

35. Hazan- Molina H, Molina- Hazan V, Schendel SA, Aizenbud D. Reliability of panoramic radiographs for the assessment of mandibular elongation after distraction osteogenesis procedures. Orthod Craniofac Res 2010: 1-8.

36. Damstra J, Fourine Z, Ren Y. Evaluation and comparison of postero-anterior cephalograms and cone- beamed computed tomography images for the detection of mandibular asymmetry. Eur J of Orthod 2015; 35: 45-50.

37. Uysal T, Sari Z. Posteroanterior cephamlometric norms in Turkish adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127: 324-32.

38. William Wijaya. Gambaran morfologi vertikal skeletal wajah berdasarkan analisis Steiner dan Jefferson. Skripsi. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2013: 6-7. 39. Enoki C, Telles CS, Matsumoto MAN. Dental-skeletal dimensions in growing individuals with variations in the lower facial height. Braz Dent J 2014; 15(1): 68-74.

40. Dahlan S. Langkah- langkah membuat proposal penelitian bidamg kedokteran dan kesehatan. 2012. 2 (3): 80-95, 161-7.

41. Buschang PH, Jr LGG. Mandibular skeletal growth and modelling between 10 and 15 years of age. Eur J of Orthod 2002; 22: 69-79.

42. Wang MK, Buschang PH, Behrents R. Mandibular rotation and changes during early childhood. Angle Orthod 2009; 79(2): 271-5.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

(1) Setelah memberikan penjelasan mengenai kewajiban melakukan Mediasi sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 17 ayat (7), Hakim Pemeriksa Perkara mewajibkan Para Pihak

This research concluded that teaching reading comprehension by using Puppet Show strategy to the eighth grade students of Islamic Junior High School Al-

Berdasarkan data (dapat dilihat pada Table 2) pada kolom selisih jarak terdapat hasil yang menunjukan seberapa optimal metode Dijkstra ini diterapkan pada

Halaman Gambar 3.1 Sketsa Proses Adsorpsi 15 Gambar 3.2 Proses Desorpsi Zeolit 15 Gambar 3.3 FlowchartAktivasi Termal Zeolit 16 Gambar 3.4 FlowchartAdsorpsi Asap Cair 17

Sehingga Ho ditolak dan H 1 diterima, atau dapat dikatakan terdapat pengaruh metode pembelajaran Resource Based Learning pada siswa yang memiliki sikap positif dan

Penetapan lokasi sampel untuk penelitian dilakukan secara purposif dengan pertimbangan jumlah sampel lokasi dari 5 lokasi yang memenuhi persyaratan dan 2 lokasi (40%) yang di pilih

Ber dasar kan pengumpulan data ter kait dengan analisis SWOT, kebutuhan calon sar jana ekonomi syar iah IAIN Palangka Raya pada per bankan syar iah Kota Palangka Raya,

[r]