DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Allen, F., Broswell, M., Rao, P.V., 1972. Distribution free approximations for chance constraints. Operations Research 22, 610-621.
Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis.Management Science, 39, 1261-1264.
Banker, R., A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science 30, 1078-1092.
Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W., 1959, Chance-constrained programming. Manage. Sci., 6, 7379.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429-444.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1981. Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: An application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Science 27, 668-697.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Symonds, G.H., 1958. Cost horizons and certainty equivalents: An approach to stochastic programming of heating oil. Manage-ment Science 4, 235-263.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Thrall, R.M., 1991. A structure for classifying and characterizing efficiencies and inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2, 197-237.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Thrall, R.M., 1986. Identifying and classifying effi-ciencies and ineffieffi-ciencies in data envelopment analysis. Operations Research Letters 5, 105-116.
Charnes, A., Haag, S., Jaska, P., Semple, J., 1992. Sensitivity of efficiency clas-sifications in the additive model of data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Systems Science 23, 789-798.
Charnes, A., Neralic, L., 1990. Sensitivity analysis of the additive model in data envelopment analysis.European Journal of Operational Research48, 332-341.
Cooper, W.W., Park, K.S. and Yu, G., 1999. IDEA and AR-IDEA: models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Manage. Sci., 45, 597607.
Cooper, W.W., Gu, B., Li, S., 2001. Note: Alternative treatments of congestion -A response to the Cherchye, Kuosmanen and Post critique.European Journal of Operational Research132, 85-87.
Cooper, W.W., Deng, H., Gu, B., Li, S., Thrall, R.M., 2001. Using DEA to improve the management of congestion in Chinese industries (1981?1997). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 35, 1-16.
Cooper, W.W., H. Deng, Z. Huang and S. Li (2001a). A Chance Constrained Pro-gramming Approach to Congestion in Stochastic Data Envelopment Analy-sis,.European Journal of Operational Research (submitted).
109
110
Cooper, W.W., Li, S., Seiford, L.M., Tone, K., Thrall, R.M., Zhu, J., 2001. Sen-sitivity and stability analysis in DEA: Some recent developments.Journal of Productivity Analysis 15, 217-246.
Cooper, W.W., Deng, H., Huang, Z.M., Li, S.X., 2002. Change constrined pro-gramming approaches to technical efficiencies and inefficiencies in stochastic data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 53, 1347-1356.
Cooper, W.W., Deng, H., Huang, Z.M., Li, S.X., 2002. A one model approach to congestion in data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 36, 231-238.
Cooper, W.W., Huang, Z., Li, S., 1996a. Satisficing DEA models under chance constraints. The Annals of Operations Research 66, 279-295.
Cooper, W.W., Thompson, R.G., Thrall, R.M., 1996b. Introduction: Ex3180 F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi et al tensions and new developments in DEA. The Annals of Operations Research 66, 3-46.
C. Yao, 2003. Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in presence of infeasibility, Eu-ropean Journal of Operational research, 161- 2, 429444.
Doyle, J. and Green, R., 1993. Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making. Omega, 21, 713715.
Farrell, M.J. 1957. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 120, part 3: pp. 253-281.
Fried H. O., Knox Lovell C. A. and Schmid S. S. , 1993. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications with OUP. Oxford Uni-versity Press.
Huang, Z. and Li S. X., 2001. Chance constrained programming and stochastic DEA models. School of Business, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York.
Land, K.C, C.A.K Lovell, and S. Thore, 1993. Chance-Constrained data envelop-ment analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14, 541-554.
L.M. Seiford and J. Zhu, 1998. Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 108, 127-39.
Markowitz, Harry, 1952. Portfolio selection. J. Financ. 7, 7797
Moskowitz, Herbert., Tang, J. and Lam, P., 2000. Distribution of aggregate utility using stochastic elements of additive multiattribute utility models. Decision Sci., 31, 327-360.
Olesen, O. B., 2002. Comparing and combining two approaches for chance con-strained DEA, Technical Report, The University of Southern Denmark.
Olesen, O. B. and N.C. Petersen, 1995. Chance Constrained efficiency evaluation. Management Science, 41, 442-457.
Pagnoncelli B.K., Ahmed S., Shapiro A., 2009. Sample Average Approximation Method for Chance Constrained Programming: Theory and Applications, Springer Science, 142: 399416.
111
R.M. Thrall, 1996. Duality, classification and slack in data envelopment analysis, Annals of Operational research, 66, 109-138.
Shapiro, A., 2003. Monte Carlo sampling methods. In: Ruszczynski, A., Shapiro, A. (eds.) Stochastic Programming. Handbooks in OR & MS, vol. 10, pp. 353425. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Sexton, T.R. and Silkman, R.H., 1986. Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. In Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, edited by R.H. Silkman, (Jossey-Bass: San Francisco).
Saen R. F. 2010. Developing a new data envelopment analysis methodology for supplier selection in the presence of both undesirable outputs and imprecise data. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Vol. 51, p.1243-1250.
Seiford, L.M and Zhu J., 1998. Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 108, 127-39.
Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J., 1999. Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment anal-ysis. INFOR 37, 174187.
Sexton, T.R. and Silkman, R.H., 1986. Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. In Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, edited by R.H. Silkman, (Jossey-Bass: San Francisco).
Tim ICT Pura, 2012, Indeks TIK 165 Kabupaten/Kota Indonesia, Buku 2 ICT Pura.
Vercellis, C., 2009. Business Intelligence: Data Mining and Optimization for Deci-sion Making, John Wiey & Sons, Ltd.
Vielma J.P., Ahmed S., and Nemhauser G.L., 2012. Mixed integer linear pro-gramming formulations for probabilistic constraints, to appear in operations research letters (preprint).
William W. Cooper, H. Deng, Zhimin Huang, Sus X.Li, 2003. Chance Constrained programming approaches to congestion in stochastic data envelopment anal-ysis. European Journal of Operational Research.
Wu, T. & Blackhurst, J. 2009. Supplier Evaluation and Selection Augmented DEA Approach. International Journal of Production Research, 47(16), 4593-4608.
Wu D. and Olson D. L., 2006. A comparison of stochastic dominance and stochastic DEA for vendor evaluation. -gInternational journal of production research, 46, 2313-2327.
Zhu, J. 2001. Super-efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 129, 443-455.
