Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=vjeb20
Journal of Education for Business
ISSN: 0883-2323 (Print) 1940-3356 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vjeb20
Service Learning: Applications and Research in
Business
Christine P. Andrews
To cite this article: Christine P. Andrews (2007) Service Learning: Applications and Research in Business, Journal of Education for Business, 83:1, 19-26, DOI: 10.3200/JOEB.83.1.19-26
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.83.1.19-26
Published online: 07 Aug 2010.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 116
View related articles
esearchers endorse integration of servicelearning(SL)intohigher educationasawaytoimprovetherel-evance of education and address com-munity needs (Zlotkowski, 1996). SL is increasingly applied in business dis-ciplines. However, assimilating struc-tural changes in the curriculum is not easy, and an examination of related research reveals institutional and pro-gramcharacteristicsthatareassociated withsuccessfulSLimplementations.In addition,SLapplicationsarenotfound evenly across all disciplines in busi-ness.Inthisarticle,Ibrieflysummarize institutional and program characteris-tics that are associated with success-ful SL programs and review published researchrelatedtoSLimplementations inbusiness,focusingonthediscipline, course,andparticularSLapplication.I concludewithsuggestionsaboutwhere SL implementation may fit best in a businesscurriculum.
SL has a broad basis of support in the United States. The presidents of Brown University, Stanford University, GeorgetownUniversity,andtheEduca-tion Commission of the United States startedCampusCompactinaneffortto createserviceopportunitiesforstudents andaddresstheperceivedmoraldecline of college students (Morton &Troppe, 1996). Campus Compact and its Proj-ect on Integrating Service With Aca-demicStudyhasgrownfromaninitial
membership of 23 schools in 1985 to over1,000two-yearandfour-yearcol-legesanduniversitiesatthepresenttime (CampusCompact,2006).SLeducators useexperientialeducationthatengages students in a curriculum connected to theircommunity.
Combining community service and academic courses and successfully accomplishing service goals while achieving learning outcomes is chal-lenging, particularly in undergraduate businesscourseswhosecurriculumcon- tentisfrequentlytechnicalandstandard-ized.Integrationintobusinesscurricula isalsochallengingbecauseinstitutions’ achievementofacademicgoalsiscriti- caltomaintainingtheirbusinessaccred-itation and enabling them to succeed with the requisite technical skills in placing students in professional posi-tions.Accomplishmentofservicegoals can come at the sacrifice of learning outcomes and vice versa. The authors ofstudiesreferredtointhisarticlefre- quentlyoffercreativestrategiesforinte-grating SL into business curricula and accomplishingcoursegoals.
InstitutionalandProgram Characteristics
Theoretical research can be related to institutional characteristics, instruc-tionalmethods,personaldevelopment,or academic outcomes in SL.Institutional
ServiceLearning:Applicationsand
ResearchinBusiness
CHRISTINEP.ANDREWS
FLORIDAGULFCOASTUNIVERSITY FORTMYERS,FLORIDA
R
ABSTRACT.Researchershavedescribedservicelearningasanidealwaytointegrate experientialeducationintocoursework whilemeetingcommunityneedsandimbu-ingstudentswithcivicresponsibility.They haveadvocatedservicelearninginbusiness asamethodtoimplementcourseconcepts andincreasestudentunderstandingofthe externalenvironment.Inthisarticle,the authorbrieflysummarizesinstitutionaland programcharacteristicsthatareassociated withsuccessfulservice-learningprograms. Shereviewsresearchpublicationsrelated toservice-learningimplementationsin business.Theauthorfoundthatthefields ofinformationsystems,management,and marketinghavemoreservice-learning applicationstiedtocourse-earningobjec-tivesthanhavethefieldsofaccountingand finance.Further,shesuggeststhatservice learningmayfitbestinbusinesscourses whereskilledinteractionwithusersisakey learninggoal.
Keywords:businesseducation,manage-ment,servicelearning
Copyright©2007HeldrefPublications
characteristics refer to dimensions of theinstitutionthatpromoteorinhibitthe integration of service learning. Instruc-tional methodology refers to character-istics of SL implementation related to programmatic features that support the achievementoflearningoutcomes,butI donotaddressthatissueinthisarticle.
Researchers liken building an engaged campus to a maturation pro-cess (AmericanAssociation for Higher Education[AAHE],2004)thatinvolves not only developing a shared language and shared learning but also building infrastructure, expanding collabora-tion, instituting policies, and assess-ing effects. Implementation of SL into universities broadly takes one of three forms including (a) implementation by course section, (b) creation of an officeofSL,or(c)formationofanSL consortium (Strand, Marullo, Cutforth, Stoecker,&Donohue,2003).
Lamb, Swinth, Vinton, and Lee (1998) attributed much of the resis-tance to the successful integration of SLtotheabsenceofinfrastructurefor sustainingserviceefforts.Theypoint-ed out that the operational aspects of SL, including identifying and nur-turing agency connections, assisting faculty with designing activities, and assisting students, require infrastruc-ture and financial commitment from theinstitution.
In a presentation to the National Service Learning Conference, Andrew Furco(2004)fromtheServiceLearning Research and Development Center at theUniversityofCaliforniaatBerkeley confirmed the need for infrastructure andproposedalistofindicatorsofthe engagedcampus,includinginstitutional structure,administrativesupport,finan-cial and development support for fac-ulty, and community opportunities and mechanisms supporting engagement. Lamb et al. (1998) cited lack of con-nection to mission as a barrier to the successfulintegrationofSLintoacol-legeofbusiness.Battaglia(1995)found thatthedegreeofcommunitydevelop-ment was correlated with institutional mission in a study of 2-year colleges. MortonandTroppe(1996)summarized survey results of SL implementations that indicated that campuses achieved the most success when SL was
con-TABLE1.PublicationsonConceptualandGeneralBusinessService Learning(SL)
Authors Year Organization Comment Godfrey,Illes,&
Berry 2005 BrighamYoungUniversity IllustrateshowSLbroadensbusinesseducation,focusing onitsholistic,problem-solvingnature. Godfrey 1999 BrighamYoung
University Makesanargumentforcompassionatecitizenry. Kolenkoetal. 1996 KennesawState
College,Rutgers University, UniversityofWest Florida,Marymount ManhattanCollege
Analyzescurriculumissues, barriers,andfacultyissues relatedtoteachingSL.
Lambetal. 1998 MontanaState
University DescribesSLintegrationthroughout4-yeareducation. Lesteretal. 2005 Universityof
Wisconsin–Eau Clair,Simmons Schoolof Management
Usesempiricaldatato evaluateSLforstudents, recruiters,andcommunity byusingstructuralequation modeling.
Papamarcos 2002 St.John’s
University Advocatestheuseofteam-basedprojectsinSL forclientorganizations illustratingkeypeople,proj-ect,andprocessissues. Papamarcos 2005 St.John’s
University Reexaminesexperiential learningadvocatinguniver-sity–communitypartnerships andstudentleadership. McCarthy&
Tucker 2002 UniversityofBaltimore,Ohio University
Usesempiricaldatato measurethelikelihoodof involvementincommunity serviceafterparticipationin SLinbusinessclasses. Morton&Troppe 1996 ProvidenceCollege,
CampusCompact Providence
ProvideshistoryofSLand discussionofeffectsonstu-dentvalues.
Ramaetal. 2000 TexasA&M International University,IowaState University,Wolcott LynchAssociates, BentleyCollege
Summarizesacademicand personalstudentSLout-comesandhowaccounting researcherscancontribute.
Salimbeneetal. 2005 BentleyCollege DescribesBentley’sService LearningCenter,theirAlli-anceforEthicsandSocial Responsibility,andSLinte-gration.
Taylor 2005 Universityof
Missouri InterviewsexperiencedSLexpertswhohaveinsights basedonresearchand experience.
Zlotkowski 1996 BentleyCollege AdvocatesuseofSLto broadenstudentperspectives andincreaseunderstanding ofexternalenvironment.
gruent with a broadly understood and acceptedmissionandwasarticulatedin thelanguageofthecampus.
Several researchers have demon-strated that faculty are reluctant to participate in SL. SL courses typically takemoretimetomanagethandotra-ditional courses. Morton and Troppe (1996)foundthatfacultyviewedcourse developmentgrantsandreleasetimeas the most important means for motivat-ing faculty to undertake SL. Berman (1999), Bergkamp (1996), and Euster and Weinbach (1994) also emphasized theimportanceoffacultyrewardinsuc-cessful implementation of SL partner-ships. Kolenko, Porter, Wheatley, and Colby (1996) advocated the use of SL inteachingbusinessethicsandprovided an analysis of curriculum and faculty issuesrelatingtomaximizationofsuc-cess. Although some of those issues maystillinfluencefacultyparticipation, the continued growth of SL and the absence of more current publications regarding faculty issues could indicate decreased importance of the issue as facultyexploretheabilityofSLtohelp themaccomplishcourseobjectives.
ResearchonSLinBusiness
TheliteratureonSLreflectsitsinter-disciplinary nature and is a relatively recentintegrationintobusinessresearch. Some disciplines have little or no pub-lished research relative to SL in their field. If faculty are not reading general business journals, then it is highly like-ly that they know nothing about appli-cations of SL in business. I compiled researches cited in this review from a searchforwords“business”and“service learning”inProquest—anonlinesearch engine. I also conducted a review of onlineresourcesavailablefromCampus Compact, the Corporation for National andCommunityService,andtheNation-al Service Learning Clearinghouse. I scanned the bibliographies of relevant research articles on business and SL. I readthearticlesintheirentiretytoobtain detailedinformationonSLimplementa-tion.Itisimportanttonotethatthereis a large body of research related to atti-tudes,behavior,andlearningthatisnot business specific, and I do not address thoseissuesinthisarticle.
TABLE2.PublicationsonService-Learning(SL)Applicationsin BusinessCoreAreas
(tablecontinues)
Authors Year Organization Comment Accounting
Gujarathi&
McQuade 2002 BentleyCollege UsesoptionalSLassign-mentinanintermediate accountingcourse. McPhail 2005 Universityof
Glasgow Usesavisittounemploy- mentandcommunitycen- terstodemonstrateaccount-ingprobonoservicesan introductiontotheprofes-sionseminar.
Rose,Rose,&
Norman 2005 LincolnUniversity,SouthernIllinois University,Virginia Commonwealth University
Reportsresultofexperi-mentingraduateaccounting informationsystemscourse usingSLastheindependent variable.
Strupeck&Whit-ton 2004 IndianaUniversityNorthwest,Purdue UniversityNorth Central
ReviewsuseofVolunteer IncomeTaxAssistance programforbothfor-credit electivecourseandnoncredit volunteeropportunity. Tschopp 2004 DamienCollege
Non-course-basedrequire-menttodesignabusiness planforcommunityproject usingAICPAcorecompe-tenciesforaframework.
Finance
Dahlquist 1998 St.Mary’sUniversity IllustratesuseofaSLproj-ectinfinancecourse.
InformationSystems
Lazar&Lidtke 2002 TowsonUniversity DescribesseveralSLappli- cationsininformationsys-temscurriculum.
Preiser-Huey&
Navarette 2006 CaliforniaStatePolytechnic University
Usesacase-studySLappli- cationinaWeb-basedsys-temsdevelopmentcourse.
Management
Angelidis,Tomic,
&Ibrahim 2004 St.John’sUniversity,Augusta StateUniversity
Providescomprehensivestra-tegicanalysisofcommunity businessororganizationina strategicmanagementcourse. Crowe 2003 St.LouisUniversity Develops,throughempirical
research,anassessmentpro-tocolforSLinmanagement education.
Kenworthy-U’Ren 2005 BentleyCollege Providesdiscussionby expertsoncrossdisciplinary issueswithSLandtheir impactonmanagement education.
Madsen&Turn-bull 2006 UtahValleyStateCollege MeasureseffectofSLproject onstudentlearningincom-pensationandbenefitscourse.
In this article, I group and summa-rize SL business research into one of fourgroups:(a)conceptualandgeneral businessSL,(b)SLapplicationsinbusi-nesscorecourses,(c)SLapplicationsin graduate business courses, and (d) SL applications in courses related to busi-nessprograms.
Tables1–4followadiscussionofthe articlesineachgroup.Iconcludewitha visionforSLinbusiness.
ConceptualandGeneralBusiness Research
Theoretical or conceptual research on businessethicspublishedinbusinessjour- nalsappearedearliest(seeTable1).Zlot-kowski(1996)advocatedtheuseofSLto broadenstudentperspectiveswhiledem-onstratingcourseconceptsandproviding alinktotheexternalenvironment.Rama, Ravenscroft, Wolcott, and Zlotkowski (2000) provided a summary of research onacademicandpersonalstudentSLout-comes that was drawn primarily from
research from outside of business disci-plinesbutprovidedvaluableinformation ontheeffectofSLonstudentacademic andpersonaloutcomes.Otherresearchers emphasized the problem-solving nature of SL projects (Godfrey, Illes, & Berry, 2005)andadvocatedtheuseofuniversity-communityprojects(Papamarcos,2005).
I have included research articles whose authors provided descriptions of SL integration at their universities. Business educators at Montana State University integrate SL in the busi-ness curriculum throughout all 4 years (Lamb et al., 1998). Bentley College hasacomparativelylonghistoryofSL, and Salimbene, Buono, LaFrage, and Nurick(2005)haveprovidedanexcel-lent description of Bentley College’s AllianceforEthicsandSocialRespon-sibility and SL integration throughout the campus. Bentley College (2006) now offers a service-learning certifi-cate,whichincludesanSLnotationon student diplomas attesting to student leadershipandcommunityengagement.
ThoseexamplesofSLimplementations aregreatstartingpointsforlearningfrom theexperts.ConceptualSLresearchers in business addressed the same issues found in SL in general, emphasizing theopportunityto(a)putbusinessskills into practice, (b) strengthen ties with the community, and (c) capitalize on experientialeducation.Inthediscussion that follows, I address SL applications inbusinesscoreareas.
SLApplicationsinBusinessCoreAreas
Educatorsachievecurriculumintegra- tionsuchasthatfoundatBentleyCol-lege and the Montana State University after many years of investment. Most integrationsstartwithanSLapplication in a specific course. The majority of researchersdescribehowSLgivesthem anopportunitytoapplycourseconcepts and provide community service. In the presentdiscussion,Ifocusonwhatareas in the business core areas are report-ing SL implementations and how SL is implemented. Accounting, finance, management, marketing, and informa-tion systems report SL applications. I revieweachoftheseareasseparately.
Aquickscanofthepublicationyears inaccountingindicatesarelativelyrecent integration into accounting curriculum (see Table 2). In addition, the major-ity of the SL implementations are not coursebased.Usinganoptionalassign- ment(Gujarathi&McQuade,2002),vis-itinganunemploymentcenter(McPhail, 2005), providingVolunteer Income Tax Assistance for elective credit (Strupeck &Whitton,2004),anddesigningabusi-nessplanaspartofanon-course-based requirement (Tschopp, 2004) are not related to classic accounting learning objectives. Those experiences instead provide excellent opportunities to involvestudentsinextracurricularactivi-ties of value to the accounting profes-sion. Rose, Rose, and Norman (2005) reportedanimprovementintheachieve-mentoflearningobjectivesfromtheuse of an SL experience in an accounting information-systems course. The rich-ness and complexity introduced by a liveclientinanaccountinginformation- systems course vividly demonstrates a major learning objective of systems development. The accounting examples
TABLE2.(Continued)
Author Year Organization Comment Salimbeneetal. 2005 BentleyCollege Summarizesexperiencein
integratingSLandreports ontheapplicationofman-agementconceptstosocial problems.
Weber&Sleeper 2003 St.CloudState
University DescribesSLapproachesinorganizationalbehaviorand legalenvironmentcourses. Marketing
Easterling&
Rudell 1997 BentleyCollege,IonaCollege DescribesSLintegrationpossibilitiesinmarketing, includinglearningout-comes.
Hagenbuch 2006 MessiahCollege DescribesaSLsalesproj- ectinanonprofitorganiza- tionandthepositiveben-efitsforbothstudentsand theorganization.
Klink&Athaide 2004 SellingerSchoolof Businessand Management, LoyolaCollege
ProvidesanSLimplementa- tionforaprinciplesofmar- ketingcoursewithassess-mentoutcomes.
Petkus 2000
BoiseStateUni-versity ProvidesexamplesofSL applicationstoseveralmar-ketingcourses.Emphasizes importanceofmarketingto nonprofits.
may indicate that faculty feel less free to experiment with alternative learning strategieswhencoursecontentisclosely tied to a national exam. Alternatively, the majority of students in an account-ingclassmaynothavegainedsufficient technicalskillstobeusefulinaliveset-tingandmayactuallycreateliabilityfor the institution or require an inordinate amountoftrainingbythecompany.
Financeisconspicuousforacompara-tivelackofSLimplementationsand,like accounting, may represent the depth of knowledge required for a student to be usefulasaprofessional.Achievementof finance-course learning objectives may notbewellservedbySLexperience.
Information-systemsSLapplications are also relatively recent and derive thesamebenefitsasdotheaccounting information systems explained earlier.
Theresearchersincludedsystemsanaly-sis,designandimplementationprojects (Lazar&Lidtke,2002)andWebdesign (Preiser-Huey & Navarette, 2006). In thelattertwoSLapplications,SLhada positiveanddirecteffectontheachieve-mentofamajorlearningobjective.
Management also has a variety of recentSLapplications.Experientiallearn-ing appears to support achievement of managementlearningobjectives.Angeli-dis,Tomic,andIbrahim(2004)reported ontheuseofSLtoprovideexperiencein preparingastrategicanalysisforacom-munitybusinessororganization.Madsen and Turnbull (2006) illustrated an SL applicationinacompensationandbene-fitscourse.Otherapplications,including application of management concepts to socialproblems(Salimbeneetal.,2005) and SL approaches used in
organiza-tionalbehavior(Weber&Sleeper,2003) are good examples and perhaps more appropriateforstudentstakingintroduc-tory courses in their major. Use of SL toprovideastrategicanalysiswouldbe appropriate for a capstone experience, requiringavarietyofskillslearnedover theyearsincollege.
Last,reportedmarketingimplementa- tionsappeartobenefitfromtheexperi-entialaspectofSL.In1997,Easterling and Rudell provided several possible opportunities for integration of SL in marketing courses. Klink and Athaide (2004) provided an SL application in an introductory marketing course on developing a marketing plan for non-profit organizations. Several of those researchersemphasizedtheimportance ofmarketingtononprofitorganizations and how this skill is frequently under-representedinemployeesofnonprofits. Overall,theresultsofpublishedstud-iesindicatethatSLapplicationsimprove theachievementoflearningobjectivesin information systems, management, and marketing.SLinthesesettingsmaybet-teraddressanimportantcoursegoalnot easilycoveredintheclassroom.TheSL applications in accounting were related toperipheralskillsandwerenotdirect-ly tied to core coursework in account-ing. I identified only one application in finance.Atthislevel,interpersonalskills are more highly ranked in information systems, management, and marketing thaninfinanceandaccounting.
SLApplicationsinGraduateBusiness Courses
Several SL applications appeared in 1996, including (a) Master of Business Administration (MBA) team projects to improve the living conditions in low-incomecommunities(Collins,1996),(b) communityserviceasleadership(Fried-man,1996),(c)astrategicmanagement capstone course that addresses a com-munityneed(Graham,1996),and(d)an action-oriented learning model (Mercer, 1996). In another research application, Brown (2000) discussed project man-agement for low-income seniors. Last, Wittmer(2004)discussedonemorecore MBAcourseinwhichthereisa“Values inAction”SLcomponent.
On the basis of this list, I conclude thatSLapplicationsgotofftoastrong
TABLE3.PublicationsonService-Learning(SL)Applicationsin GraduateBusinessCourses
Author Year Organization Comment Bies 1996 Georgetown
University DescribesgraduateSLproj-ectthatfocusedonsocial realityofpowerlessness. Brown 2000 Universityof
Washington MBAstudentslearnprojectmanagementskillswhile managingdevelopment projectsforlow-income seniors.
Collins 1996 Universityof
Wisconsin–Madison DescribesMBAteamprojectsinbusinessand societyethicsclassaimedat improvinglivingconditions inlow-incomecommunities. Friedman 1996 WhartonSchool,
Universityof Pennsylvania
Describesgraduateteam projectsincludingcommu-nityserviceinaleadership course
Graham 1996 LoyolaUniversity
Chicago Describesstrategic-manage-mentcapstonecoursein whichstudentspreparea businessplantoaddressa communityneed. Mercer 1996 Universityof
Michigan Describes2-dayaction-learningmodelapplied duringorientationinwhich studentsworkedoncommu-nityprojects.
Wittmer 2004 Universityof
Denver CoreMBAcourseknownasValuesinActionconnects SLtoethics,law,andpub-licpolicy.Assessmentalso included.
startinbusinessandtheneithertapered off or stayed flat. However, my exam-ination of three university Web sites revealed impressive activity. Stanford University’s Graduate School of Busi-ness includes the Center for Social Innovation.Theinstructorsatthecenter engagestudentsandalumniinsocialand environmentalissues(StanfordUniver-sityGraduateSchoolofBusiness,2007) and encompasses thought leadership, student engagement, and community
engagementintheSchoolofBusiness. Harvard Business School offers a full-immersion program (Harvard Business SchoolImmersionProgram,2007)that includesaNewOrleansServiceImmer-sion that focuses on education, rede-velopment, and rebuilding, and gives students a chance to use management skills.ThefocusofColoradoStateUni-versity’sCollegeofBusinessCenterfor BusinessEthicsandSocialIssuesison the application of marketing principles
andtechniquestosocialproblems(Col- oradoStateUniversityCollegeofBusi-ness, 2007). Although publications on integration of SL are not readily avail-ableinbusinessliterature,theimportant innovationsofsomeoftheuniversities thatwerementionedearliermayreflect a shift in business education and an integrationofSLintothecurriculumat aprogramlevel(seeTable3).
SLApplicationsinBusiness-Related Courses
I found many SL applications in courses related to business, including businesscommunications(Dallimore& Souza, 2002; Fielding, 2003; Stevens, 2001;andTucker,McCarthy,Hoxmeier, & Lenk, 1998), ethics (Fleckenstein, 1997;Kohls,1996),andotherareas(see Table 4). Communication is a good fit for SL projects because of the oppor-tunities it provides students to explore cross-cultural issues and build social skills. Ethics is also a good choice for SL applications because those experi-encescanofferstudentsanopportunity toexerciseethicaljudgment.
VisionofSLintheBusiness Curriculum
IntegrationofSLinthebusinesscur-riculum can help universities and col-leges achieve their objectives. SL can createstrongertiesbetweenschooland community and provide students with experientiallearningandanopportunity to exercise new skills. My examina- tionofpublishedliteratureonSLindi-cated that SL is not integrated evenly throughout the business curriculum. Somecontentareasappearedtobeable toaccommodateanSLapplicationwith greaterfacilitythanotherswere.There-fore, coordination of SL implementa-tionatthecollegelevelmaybethebest way to derive maximum benefits from SL experiences. The question is what learning objectives do faculty and col-leges hope to achieve and what is the bestwaytoachievethem.
Leadersinthisarea(StanfordUniver- sity’sCenterforSocialInnovation,Uni-versityofCaliforniaatBerkley’sService Learning Research and Development Center, Colorado State University Col-lege of Business’s Center for Business
TABLE4.PublicationsonService-Learning(SL)Applicationsin Business-RelatedCourses
Authors Year Organization Comment Dallimore&
Souza 2002 NortheasternUniversity, HumboldtState University
Pedagogicalissuesrelated touseofSLinbusiness communicationsclass. Fielding 2003 PennState
University Describesassignmentsthatintegratedcross-culturaland sociallyconsciousissues intobusinesscommunica-tionsandadvancedbusiness writingcourses.
Fleckenstein 1997 CatholicUniversity ArguesforuseofSLpeda-gogytoeducatestudentsin businessethics.
Hogner 1996 FloridaInternational
University Reportsonbusinessenvi-ronmentprojectfeeding homelessthathasspread acrosstheuniversity. Kenworthy 1996 BentleyCollege SummarizesSLprojects
involvingover25%of businessfacultyand3,000 students.
Kohls 1996 GonzagaUniversity Describestheuseofstudent reflectioninstudentjournals inanethicscourse.
Middleton 2005 TexasA&M
University UsesanSLprojecttodem- onstrateleadershipcharac-teristics.
Smith 1996 NorthCentral
College Describesserviceintern-shiptodemonstrateethical values.
Stevens 2001 Universityof
Michigan DescribesuseofSLasjointprojectbetween AmericanandRussian studentsassistingnonprofit organizationsinorganiza-tionalcommunications. Tuckeretal. 1998 OhioUniversity,
Universityof Baltimore,Colorado StateUniversity
Describesuseofcommu-nitySLincommunications coursetoimprovestudent socialskillsandcommuni-cationsskills.
Ethics and Social Issues) create enti-ties with broad umbrellas that provide focusandcoordination,supportingpar-ticipantsandservingasliaisonsbetween the campus and community. Educators attheColoradoStateUniversityCollege of Business’s Center for Business Eth-ics and Social Issues conduct research, training,andserviceprojectsthataddress social issues. This center operates as more than an umbrella for SL imple-mentation and provides very specific strategic focus and direction. Many of the center’s researchers focus on social marketing to unsell harmful behaviors (ColoradoStateUniversity,2007).Those unifyingconceptsserveasaframework, withtheobjectiveofengagingstudents andalumniinsocialandenvironmental issues. The goal is the development of people who are engaged in their com-munityandworld.Althoughinteresting innovations can arise from individual course SL applications, SL implemen-tations may not be evenly effective or applicable across business disciplines; therefore, coordination of SL efforts at the college level can provide strategic direction to assist the achievement of desiredstudentoutcomesandcoordinate SLexperiencesinthecollege.
SL has increased because it provides desiredacademicandpersonaloutcomes. However,researchersandeducatorshave todeterminewhereSLbestappliesand how it should be implemented. Addi-tional research to determine the vari- ablescriticalforsuccessfulimplementa-tion and learning objectives best served by SL experience, and additional study about the relationship of SL to the col-legeasawhole,wouldhelpclarifyand strengthentheroleofSLinbusiness.
NOTES
Dr.ChristineP.Andrews’researchfocuseson therelationbetweenbusinessprocessknowledge andevaluationandaccountingforenvironmental impacts.
Correspondence concerning this article should beaddressedtoDr.ChristineP.Andrews,College ofBusiness,FloridaGulfCoastUniversity,10501 FGCUBlvd.,S.,FortMyers,FL33965.
E-mail:candrews@fgcu.edu
REFERENCES
American Association for Higher Education (AAHE). (2004).Campus progress: Support-ing the scholarship of teachSupport-ing and learning. Washington,DC:Stylus.
Angelidis,A.,Tomic,I.,&Ibrahim,N.A.(2004). Servicelearningprojectsenhancestudentlearn-inginstrategicmanagementcourses.Reviewof Business,25(2),32–36.
Battaglia, P. A. (1995).The community ser-vice and adult education functions of urban two-year colleges: Promising programs in responsetoinnercityproblems.Unpublished doctoraldissertation,UniversityofWisconsin-Madison,WI.
Bentley College. (2006).Service learning cer-tificate. Retrieved on September 17, 2006, from http://www.bentley.edu/service-learning /service-learning_certificate.cfm
Bergkamp,V.(1996).Fanningtheembers:Service learning in Catholic colleges and universities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University ofSt.Thomas,MN.
Berman,G.L.(1999).Antecedentsandstrategies for the successful implementation of service learningprogramsinhighereducation. Unpub- lisheddoctoraldissertation,UniversityofMas-sachusetts,Boston.
Bies, R. J. (1996). Down and out in DC: How GeorgetownMBAstudentslearnaboutleader-shipthroughservicetoothers. JournalofBusi-nessEthics,15,103–110.
Brown,K.A.(2000).Developingprojectmanage-mentskills:Aservicelearningapproach. Proj-ectManagementJournal,31(4),53–58. Campus Compact. (2006).Welcome to the
Campus Compact website. Retrieved on September16,2006,fromhttp://www.com-pact.org/
Collins, D. (1996). Serving the homeless and low-income communities through business & society/businessethicsclassprojects:TheUni-versityofWisconsin-MadisonPlan.Journalof BusinessEthics,15(1),67–85.
Colorado State University College of Business. (2007).Center for Business Ethics and Social Issues.RetrievedJanuary10,2007,fromhttp:// www.biz.colostate.edu/SocialIssues/
Crowe,D.C.(2003).Servicelearningassessment inmanagementeducation:Thedevelopmentof a protocol. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, St.LouisUniversity,St.Louis.
Dahlquist,J.R.(1998).Usingservicelearningin finance—aprojectexample. JournalofFinan-cialEducation,24,76–80.
Dallimore, E. J. & Souza,T. J. (2002). Consult-ingcoursedesign:Theoreticalframeworksand pedagogical strategies.Business Communica-tionQuarterly,65,86–114.
Easterling, D., & Rudell, F. (1997). Rationale, benefits, and methods of service learning in marketingeducation.JournalofEducationfor Business,73(1),58–61.
Euster,G.L.,&Weinbach,R.W.(1994).Faculty rewards for community service activities: An update.JournalofSocialWorkEducation,30, 317–324.
Fielding, M. (2003). Two assignments that inte-gratedcrossculturalandsocialissues.Business CommunicationQuarterly,66,107–121.
Fleckenstein,M.(1997).Servicelearninginbusi-ness ethics.Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 137–141.
Friedman,S.D.(1996).Communityinvolvement projects inWharton’s MBA curriculum. Jour-nalofBusinessEthics,15,95–101.
Furco, A. J. (2001). Advancing service learning at research universities.New Directions for HigherEducation,2001,67–78.
Furco, A. J. (2004, March 28).The education-al impacts of service learning: What do we knowfromtheresearch?Paperpresentedatthe
National Service Learning Conference, Albu-querque,NM.
Godfrey,P.C.(1999).ArejoindertoKenworthy-U’Ren enlarging the tent of service learning.
JournalofManagementInquiry,8,388–390. Godfrey,P.C.,Illes,L.M.,&Berry,G.R.(2005).
Creatingbreadthinbusinesseducationthrough service learning.Academy of Management LearningandEducation,4,309–323. Graham, J. (1996). Business plan proposals for
inner-cityneighborhoods:Astrategicmanage-ment assigninner-cityneighborhoods:Astrategicmanage-ment for MBA students at Loyola UniversityChicago.JournalofBusinessEthics, 15,87–94.
Gujarathi,M.R.,&McQuade,R.J.(2002).Ser-vicelearninginbusinessschools:Acasestudy in an intermediate accounting course.Journal ofEducationforBusiness,77,144–150. Hagenbuch,D.J.(2006).Servicelearninginputs
and outcomes in a personal selling course.
JournalofMarketingEducation,28(1),26–34. Harvard Business School Immersion Program.
(2007).Harvard Business School offers new “immersion”programs.RetrievedJanuary10, 2007, from http://www.hbs.edu/news/121906_ immersion.html
Hogner,R.H.(1996).Speakinginpoetry:Com-munityservice-basedbusinesseducation. Jour-nalofBusinessEthics,15(1),33–43. Kenworthy,A. L. (1996). Linking business
edu-cation, campus culture and community: The Bentley Service Learning Project.Journal of BusinessEthics,15,121–131.
Kenworthy-U’Ren,A. (2005).Toward a scholar-shipofengagement:AdialoguebetweenAndy VandeVenandEdwardZlotkowski.Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 355–362.
Klink,R.R.,&Athaide,G.A.(2004).Implement- ingservicelearningintheprinciplesofmarket-ing course.Journal of Marketing Education, 26,145–153.
Kohls,J.(1996).Studentexperienceswithservice learninginabusinessethicscourse.Journalof BusinessEthics,15,45–57.
Kolenko,T.A.,Porter,G.,Wheatley,W.,&Colby, M.(1996).Acritiqueofservicelearningproj-ects in management education: Pedagogical foundations, barriers, and guidelines. Journal ofBusinessEthics,15,133–142.
Lamb,C.H.,Swinth,R.L.,Vinton,K.L.,&Lee, J.B.(1998).Integratingservicelearningintoa business school curriculum.Journal of Man-agement,22,637–655.
Lazar, J., & Lidtke, D. (2002). Service learning partnerships in the information systems cur-riculum. In J. Lazar (Ed.),Managing IT com-munity partnerships in the 21st Century (pp. 1–16).Hershey,PA:IdeaGroup.
Lester,S.W.,Tomkovick,C.,Wells,T.,&Flunk-er,L.(2005).Doesservicelearningaddvalue? Examining the perspectives of multiple stake-holders.Academy of Management Learning andEducation,4,278–294.
Madsen,S.R.,&Turnbull,O.(2006).Academic service learning experiences of compensation and benefit course students.Journal of Man-agementEducation,30,724–742.
McCarthy,A.M.,&Tucker,M.L.(2002).Encour- agingcommunityservicethroughservicelearn-ing.Journal of Management Education, 26, 629–648.
McPhail,K.(2005).Careinthecommunity:Pro-fessional ethics and the paradox of probono.
AccountingEducation,14,213–227.
Mercer,G.I.(1996).TheglobalcitizenshipMBA
versityofMichiganbusinessschool.Journalof BusinessEthics,15,111–120.
Middleton, K. L. (2005). The service-learning projectasasupportivecontextforcharismatic leadership emergence in nascent leaders.The Academy of Management Learning & Educa-tion,4,295–308.
Morton, K., & Troppe, M. (1996). From the marginstothemainstream:CampusCompact’s project on integrating service with academic study.JournalofBusinessEthics,15,21–32.
Papamarcos,S.D.(2002).The“nextwave”inser-vice learning: Integrative, team-based engage-ments with structural objectives.Review of Business,23,31–38.
Papamarcos, S. D. (2005). Giving traction to management theory: Today’s service learning.
Academy of Management Learning & Educa-tion,4,325–335.
Petkus, E. (2000). A Theoretical and Practical FrameworkforServicelearninginMarketing: Kolb’sExperientialLearningCycle.Journalof MarketingEducation,22,64–70.
Preiser-Huey, L., & Navarrete, C. J. (2006). Exploring the learning in service learning: A caseofacommunity-basedresearchprojectin Websystemsdevelopment. JournalofInforma-tionSystemsEducation,17,273–285. Rama, D. V., Ravenscroft, S. P., Wolcott, S.
K., & Zlotkowski, E. (2000). Service
learn-ing outcomes: Guidelines for educators and researchers.Issues in Accounting Education, 15,657–692.
Rose, J. M., Rose, A. M., & Norman, C. S. (2005).Aservice-learningcourseinaccounting information systems.Journal of Information Systems,19,145–172.
Salimbene,F.P.,Buono,A.F.,LaFrage,V.V.S., & Nurick, A. J. (2005). Service learning and management education: The Bentley experi-ence.Academy of Management Learning & Education,4,336–344.
Smith, D. C. (1996). Ethical reflection and ser-vice internships.Journal of Business Ethics, 15,59–65.
StanfordUniversityGraduateSchoolofBusiness. (2007).CenterforSocialInnovation.Retrieved January 10, 2007, from http://www.gsb.stan-ford.edu/csi/about/programs.html
Stevens, B. (2001). Cross-cultural service learn-ing: American and Russian students learn applied organizational communications. Busi-nessCommunicationQuarterly,64(3),59–70. Strand, K., Marullo, S., Cutforth, N., Stoecker,
R., & Donohue, P. (2003).Community based researchandhighereducation.SanFrancisco: JosseyBass.
Strupeck,C.D.,&Whitten,D.(2004).Account-ing service learnStrupeck,C.D.,&Whitten,D.(2004).Account-ing experiences and the IRS volunteer income tax assistance programme:
A teaching note.Accounting Education, 13, 101–112.
Taylor, M. (2005). A service learning kaleido-scope of insights: Conversations with Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, theorist/systems change art-ist; Bernard Milano, practitioner/foundation leader; and John Saltmarsh, historian/service learning educator.Academy of Management Learning&Education,4,363–376.
Tschopp, D. J. (2004). The Seneca Babcock business plan: A case study in using service learning to meet the AICPA core competen-cies.Journal of Education for Business, 79, 261–266.
Tucker, M. L., McCarthy, A. M., Hoxmeier, J. A.,&Lenk,M.M.(1998).Communityservice learningincreasescommunicationskillsacross thebusinesscurriculum. BusinessCommunica-tionQuarterly,61,88–100.
Weber,P.S.,&Sleeper,B.(2003).Enrichingstu-dent experiences: Multi-disciplinary exercises in service learning.Teaching Business Ethics, 7,417–435.
Wittmer,D.P.(2004).Businessandcommunity: Integrating service learning in graduate busi-nesseducation.JournalofBusinessEthics,51, 359–371.
Zlotkowski,E.(1996).Opportunityforall:Link-ing service learnZlotkowski,E.(1996).Opportunityforall:Link-ing and business education.
JournalofBusinessEthics,15,5–19.
From Higher Aims to Hired Hands
The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession
Rakesh Khurana
Is management a profession? Should it be? Can it be? This major work of social and intellectual history reveals how such questions have driven business education and shaped American management and society for more than a century. The book is also a call for reform. Rakesh Khurana shows that university-based business schools were founded to train a professional class of managers in the mold of doctors and lawyers but have effectively retreated from that goal, leaving a gaping moral hole at the center of business education and perhaps in management itself. The time has come, he concludes, to rejuvenate intellectually and morally the training of our future business leaders.
“This is a wonderful and important book for anyone interested in business education. . . . In providing a sociological understanding of the origins of business education and the professionalization of management, this book prompts deep reflection about the state of management today and offers real insight into the challenges of elevating the standards of this particular profession.”
—Joel Podolny, dean of Yale School of Management
Cloth $35.00 978-0-691-12020-1
800.777.4726 press.princeton.edu