D IPA 0907607 Bibliography

13 

Teks penuh

(1)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Abd El-Hay, S. A. and abd-Allah, S. A. (2015). Effect of Problem-Based Learning Strategy on Development of Problem Solving Skills among Undergraduate Nursing Students. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science (IOSR-JNHS), volume 4, Issue 3, pp 01-13.

Abdullahi, H. (2014). The role of ICT in teaching science education in schools. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, volume. 19, pp. 217-223.

Abela, J. (2009). Adult learning theories and medical education: a review. Malta Medical Journal, volume 21, Issue 01, pp. 11-18.

Adams, W. K. and Wieman, C. E. (2010). Development and Validation of Instruments to Measure Learning of Expert-Like Thinking. International Journal of Science Education, pp. 1–24.

Akçay, B. (2009). Problem-Based Learning in Science Education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, volume 6, issue 1, pp. 26-36.

Akınoğlu, O. and Tandoğan, R. Ö. (2007). The Effects of Problem-BasedActive Learning in Science Education on Students’ Academic Achievement, Attitude and ConceptLearning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, vol 3, issue 1, pp. 71-81.

Ali, M. (2013). Penelitian Pendidikan Prosedur dan Strategi. Bandung: Angkasa. Amir, M. T. (2009). Inovasi Pendidikan Melalui Problem Based Learning.

Bagaimana Pendidik Memberdayakan Pemelajar di Era Pengetahuan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group

Anga, K. C. S. and Reyk, D. V. (2013). ‘Teach Me Chemistry Like a Ladder and

Make it Real’–Barriers and Motivations Students Face in Learning Chemistry for Bioscience. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, volume 21, issue 2, pp. 1-12.

Arends, R. I. (2007). Learning to Teach. New York: McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Edisi 2. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arroio, A. (2010). Context based learning: A role for cinema in science education. Journal Science Education International. Volume. 21, no.3, pp. 131-143. Aydede, M. N. and Matyar, F. (2009). The Effect of Active Learning Approach in

Science Teaching on Cognitive Level of Student Achievement. Journal of Turkish Science Education, volume 6, issue 1, pp.115-127

(2)

Balım, A. G. (2009). The Effects of Discovery Learning on Students’ Success and

Inquiry Learning Skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, issue 35, pp. 1-20.

Belt, et al. (2005). Using a context-based approach to undergraduate chemistry teaching–a case study for introductory physical chemistry. Journal Chemistry Education Research and Practice, volume 6, issue 3, pp. 166-179.

Batdi, V. (2014). The effects of a problem based learning approach on students’ attitude levels: A meta-analysis. Journal Educational Research and Reviews, volume. 9, issue 9, pp. 272-276.

Bennett, J. and Lubben, F. (2006). Context-based Chemistry:The Salters approach. International Journal of Science Education, volume 28, no. 9, issue 14, pp. 999–1015.

Bhargava, A. and Pthy, M. (2011). Perception of Student Teachers about Teaching Competencies. American International Journal of Contemporary Research,volume 1, no.1, pp. 77-81.

Bilgin, I., Şenocak, E., and Sözbilir, M. (2008). The Effects of Problem-Based

Learning Instruction on University Students’ Performance of Conceptual

and Quantitative Problems in Gas Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, volume 5, issue 2, pp. 153-164.

Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the Successful Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning Environments: A Review of the Literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, volume 5, issue 3, pp. 235-245.

Brady and Holum. (1993). Chemistry The Study of Matter and Its Changes. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Brown, T. L., et al. (2009). Chemistry The Central Science, Eleventh Edition. Singapore: Pearson Education, Pte. Ltd.

BSNP. (2006). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Bulunuz, M. and Jarrett, O. S. (2010). Developing an interest in science: background experiences of preservice elementary teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, volume 5, no. 1, pp. 65-84 Burton, et al (1994). Salter Advanced Chemistry: Chemical Storylines.

Melbourne: Heinemann

Cardellini, L. (2012). Chemistry: Why the Subject is Difficult? en línea 24/04/2012. educación química.

(3)

Chang, R. (2009). General Chemistry The Essential Concepts, Fifth Edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.

Chen, B. and Wei, B. (2015). Investigating the Factors that Influence Chemistry

Teachers’ Use of Curriculum Materials: The Case of China. Journal Science Education International , volume 26, issue 2, pp. 195-216.

Chiang, C. L. and Lee, H. (2016). The Effect of Project Based Learning on Learning Motivation and Problem Solving Ability of Vocational High School Students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Volume 6, no. 9, pp. 709-712.

Chittleborough, G., Treagust, D., and Mocerino, M. (2005). Non-Major Chemistry

Students’ Learning Strategies: Explaining Their Choice and Examining the

Implication for Teaching and Learning. Journal Science Education International, volume 16, no. 1, pp. 5-21.

Cindy, E. and Hmelo, S. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Journal Educational Psychology Review, volume 16, no. 3. Coenders, F., et al. (2010). The Effects of the Design and Development of a

Chemistry Curriculum Reform on Teachers’Professional Growth: A Case Study. Journal Science Teacher Education, volume 21, pp.535–557.

Coenders, F. and Terlouw, C. (2015). A Model for In-service Teacher Learning in the Context of an Innovation. Journal Science Teacher Education, volume 26, pp. 451–470.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education Sixth edition. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group

Coll, R.K. & Taylor, N. (2009). Scientific Literacy and Purposes for Teaching Science: A Case Study of Lebanese Private School Teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, volume 4, no. 3, pp. 289-299.

Crawford, M. L. (2001). Teaching Contextually Research, Rationale, and Techniques for Improving Student Motivation and Achievement in Mathematics and Science. Texas: CCI Publishing, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research. Planing, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Planning, Conducting, And Evaluating Quantitative And Qualitative Research, Fourth Edition. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc. Creswell, J. W. and Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed

Methods Research. New Delhi: Sage Publication.

Dani, D. (2009). Scientific Literacy and Purposes for Teaching Science: A Case Study of Lebanese Private School Teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, volume 4, no. 3, pp. 289-299

(4)

Teaching, Tufts University. tersedia http://www.bu.edu/hps-

scied/files/2012/10/Meltzer-HPS-Active-Learning-Instruction-in-Physics.pdf

De Vito, K. M. (2009). Implementing Adult Learning Principles To Overcome Barriers Of Learning In Continuing Higher Education Programs. Online Journal of Workforce Education and Development, volume III, Issue 4, pp. 1-10.

Deen, I. S. (2006). Contextual Teaching And Learning Practices In The Family And Consumer Sciences Curriculum. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, volume 24, no. 1.

Demircioğlu, G., Demircioğlu, H., & Yadigaroğlu, M. (2013). An Investigation

of Chemistry Student Teachers’ Understanding of Chemical Equilibrium.

International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, volume 4, issue: 2, pp.185-192

Deskripsi dan Garis-Garis Besar Program Pengajaran Kelompok Mata Kuliah Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam PGSD. (2001). Bandung: FIP UPI. Dogru, M. (2008). The Application of Problem Solving Method on Science

Teacher Trainees on the Solution of the Environmental Problems. Journal of Environmental & Science Education, volume 3, issue 1, pp. 9–18.

Donnell, C., O’Connor, C. and Seery, M. K. (2007). Developing practical

chemistry skills by means of student-driven problem based learning mini-projects. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol 8, issue 2, pp. 130-139.

Ejidike, I. P. and Oyelana, A. A. (2015). Factors Influencing Effective Teaching of Chemistry: A Case Study of Some Selected High Schools in Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. International Journal Education Science, volume 8, issue 3, pp. 605-617 Ertikanto, C. (2013). Pengembangan Program Pelatihan Kemampuan Inkuiri dan

Membelajarkan Sains Berbasis Inkuiri dengan Pemodelan bagi Guru-guru Sekolah Dasar. Disertasi. Tidak diterbitkan. Bandung: PPs Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Etherington, M. B. (2011). Investigative Primary Science: A Problem-based Learning Approach. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, volume 36, issue 9, pp. 52-74.

Eubanks, L. P., et al. (2009). Chemistry In Context: Applying Chemistry to Society, Sixth Edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc Fattah, N. (2008). Landasan Manajemen Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja

Rosdakarya.

(5)

Finn, D. (2011). Principles of Adult Learning: An ESL Context. Journal of Adult Education Information Series, volume 40, no. 1, pp. 34-39.

Fitria, Y. (2013). Integrasi Konsep Kimia dalam Perkuliahan Konsep Dasar Biologi Berbasis Masalah bagi Mahasiswa PGSD untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan konsep dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. Disertasi. Tidak diterbitkan. Bandung: PPs Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Gallagher, S. A. and Gallagher, J. J. (2013). Using Problem-based Learning to Explore Unseen Academic Potential. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, volume 7, no. 1.

Garritano, J. R. (2010). Trends in Chemical Information Literacy and Collection Development, 2000–2009. Libraries Research Publications. Paper 15.

Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the Nature of “Context” in Chemical Education.

International Journal of Science Education, volume 28, issue 9, pp. 957– 976.

Gilbert, J. K.; Bulte, A. M. W. and Pilot, A. (2011). Concept Development and Transfer in Context-Based Science Education. International Journal of Science Education, volume 33, no. 6, pp. 817–837.

Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G. and Brickman, P. (2007). Nonscience Majors Learning Science: A Theoretical Model of Motivation. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, volume. 44, no. 8, pp. 1088–1107.

Goldberg. (2007). Fundamentals of Chemistry, Fifth Edition. New York: The

McGraw−Hill Companies.

Hajrić, Z. M. and Nuić, Š. A. (2015). The effects of problem based learning on

students' achievements in primary school chemistry. Bulletin of the Chemists and Technologists of Bosnia and Herzegovina, volume 44, pp. 17-22.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores [online]. Tersedia: http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf. di akses 29 pebruari 2016.

Hamalik, O. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: Rosda Karya.

Harrell, P. E. (2010). Teaching an Integrated Science Curriculum: Linking Teacher Knowledge and Teaching Assignments. Issues in Teacher Education, volume 19, number 1, pp. 145-165

Hartman, K., Moberg, C., and Lambert, J. M. (2014). Effectiveness of problem-based learning in introductory business courses. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, pp. 1-13.

(6)

Hmelo, C. E. and Silver. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 235-266.

Holbrook, J. (2005). Making Chemistry Teaching Relevant. Journal Chemical Education International, volume 6, no. 1. pp. 1-12.

Holbrook, J. (2010). Education through science as a motivational innovation for science education for all. Journal Science Education International, volume 21, no.2, pp. 80-91.

http://info-menarik.net/hasil-ukg-kemendikbud-tahun-2015/

http://www.jpnn.com/read/2012/03/08/120027/Nilai-Kompetensi-Gurus-SD-Buruk-

Huang, K. S. and Wang, T. P. (2012). Applying Problem based Learning (PBL) in University English Translation Classes. The Journal of International Management Studies, volume 7, number 1, pp. 121-127.

Hull, D. (1999). Teaching Science Contextually. Texas: CORD Communications, Inc.

Hung, W. (2009). The 9-step problem design process for problem-based learning: Application of the 3C3R model. Journal Educational Research Review, volume 4, pp. 118–141.

Icoz, O. F. (2015). Turkish chemistry teachers’ views about secondary school

chemistry curriculum: A perspective from environmental education. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), volume 1, issue 2, pp. 79-87.

Illingworth, S., Burke, D. S, K. and Amy B. (2012). Investigations of Socio-Biological Literacy of Science and Non-Science Students. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, volume 20, issue 2, pp. 55-67.

Indrawan, R. dan Yaniawati, P. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Campuran untuk Manajemen, Pembangunan, dan Pendidikan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Inel, D. and Balim, A. (2010). The Effects Of Using Problem-Based Learning In Science And Technology Teaching Upon Students’ Academic Achievement And Levels Of Structuring Concepts. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, volume 11, Issue 2, pp.1-23.

Irwin, D., Farrrelly, R., and Garnett, P. (2007). Chemistry contexts. Preliminary. 2nd ed. Australia: Pearson Education.

Jong, O. (2006). Making chemistry meaningful: Conditions for successful context-based teaching. Jornadas Internacionales Educación Química volume 17, issue x, pp. 215-221.

(7)

Kaya, E. and Cetin, P. S. (2012). Investigation Of Pre-Service Chemistry

Teachers’ Chemistry Laboratory Anxiety Levels. International Journal On New Trends in Education and Their Implications, volume 3, issue: 3, pp. 1309-6249.

Kelly, O.C. and Finlayson, O. E. (2007). Providing solutions through problem-based learning for the undergraduate 1styear chemistry laboratory. Journal Chemistry Education Research and Practice, volume 8, issue 3, pp. 347-361.

Kenner, C. and Weinerman, J. (2011). Adult LearningTheory: Applications to Non-Traditional College Students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, volume 41, issue 2, pp. 87-96.

Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 232/U/2000 Tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi dan Penilaian Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa.

Kimani, G. N., Kara, A. M. and Njagi, L. W. (2013). Teacher Factors Influencing

Students’ Academic Achievement In Secondary Schools In Nyandarua

County, Kenya. International Journal of Education and Research,volume 1, no. 3, pp. 1-14.

King, D. T. (2007). Teacher beliefs and constraints in implementing a contextbased approach in chemistry. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, volume 53, issue 1, pp. 14-18.

Köksal, M. S. (2013). A Comprehensive Research Design for Experimental Studies in Science Education. Journal Elementary Education Online, volume 12, issue 3, pp. 628-634.

Komalasari, K. (2011). Pembelajaran Kontekstual Konsep dan Aplikasi. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Komara, E. (2014). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Interaktif. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Kurikulum 2013 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (2016). Bandung: UPI Press Liakopoulou, M. (2011). The Professional Competence of Teachers: Which

qualities, attitudes, skills and knowledge contribute to a teacher’s

effectiveness?. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, volume 1, no. 21. Pp. 66-78.

Liliasari. (2009). Inovasi Pembelajaran IPA: Mengapa dan Bagaimana. Materi Workshop dalam Kegiatan Pengabdian Masyarakat SPs UPI: Tidak diterbitkan

Lin, S.Y. (2009). Chemical Literacy and Learning Sources of Non-Science Major Undergraduates on Understandings of Environmental Issues. Journal Chemical Education Journal (CEJ),volume 13, no. 1.

(8)

Loyens, S. M. (2011). Problem-based learning. Educational Psychology Handbook Vol 2 (p. a). Washington: American Psychological Association. Mai, M. Y. (2015). Developing Context-Based Science Curriculum: Humanizing

Science Curriculum. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, volume 4, no 1, pp. 171-184.

Magwilang, E. B. (2016). Teaching Chemistry in Context: Its Effects on Students’ Motivation, Attitudes and Achievement in Chemistry. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, volume 15, no.4, pp. 60-68.

Malik, M. A., Murtaza, A. and Khan, A. M. (2011). Role of Teachers in Managing Teaching Learning Situation. Interdisciplinary Journal Of Contemporary Research In Business, volume 3, no. 5, pp. 783-833.

Mbajiorgu, N. and Reid, N. (2006). Factors Influencing Curriculum Development in Chemistry. Higher Education Academy Physical Sciences Centre

McFarlane, D. A. (2013). Understanding the Challenges of Science Education in the 21st Century: New Opportunities for Scientific Literacy. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, volume 4, pp 35-44.

Mergendoller, J., Maxwell, N. and Bellisimo, Y. (2006).The Effectiveness of Problem-based Instruction: A Comparative Study of Instructional Methods and Student Characteristics. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, volume 1, no. 2, pp. 49–69.

Morallos, L. H. et al. (2014). Personal and Professional Competencies of Senior Teacher Education Students. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovations, volume. 2, Issue 4, pp: 134-138.

Motlhabane, A. and Dichaba, M. (2013). Andragogical Approach to Teaching and Learning Practical Work in Science: A Case of In-service Training of Teachers. International Journal Education Science, volume 5, issue 3, pp. 201-207.

Mozeika, D and Bilbokaite, R. (2010). Teaching and Learning Method for Enhancing 15-16 Years Old Students` Knowledge as One Of Scientific Literacy Aspect in Chemistry: Results Based on Research and Approbation. The International Journal of Educational Researchers, volume 3, issue 1, pp. 1-16

Nadeem, M., et al (2011). Teacher’s Competencies and Factors Affecting the

Performance of Female Teachers in Bahawalpur (Southern Punjab) Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, volume 2, no. 19, pp. 217-222.

Nahum, et al. (2012). Can Final Examinations Amplify Students’ Misconceptions In Chemistry? Journal Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, volume 5, no. 3, pp. 301-325.

(9)

Nbina, J. B. (2013). The Relative Effectiveness of Guided Discovery and Demonstration Teaching Methods on Achievement of Chemistry Students of Different levels of Scientific Literacy. Journal of Research in Education and Society; volume 4, no. 1, pp. 1-8.

Newton, D. E. (2007). Chemistry of the Environment. New York: Facts On File, Inc.

O’Neale, L. G., Maughan, J. and Ogunkola, B. (2014). Scientific literacy of

undergraduate chemistry students in the University of the West Indies, Barbados: individual and joint contributions of age, sex and level of study. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, volume 13, pp. 41-55

Onen, A. S. and Ulusoy, F. M.. (2014). Developing The Context-Based Chemistry Motivation Scale: Validity and Reliability Analysis. Journal of Baltic Science Education, volume 13, no. 6, pp. 809-820.

OECD-PISA. (2003). First Results From PISA 2003 (executive summary). www.pisa.oecd.org.

---. (2006). Science Competencies for Tommorow’s Word. Volume 1: Analysis. USA: OECD-PISA

---.(2006). Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education: Lessons from PISA for the United States. Tersedia: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/46623978.pdf.

Ollington, G. F. (2008). Teachers & teaching : strategies, innovations and problem solving. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Overton, T. L and John S. B. (2010). Internationalisation of the chemistry curriculum: two problem-based learning activities for undergraduate chemists. Journal Chem. Educ. Res. Pract, volume 11, pp. 124–128.

Palmer, D. (2005). A Motivational View of Constructivist-informed Teaching. International Journal of Science Education, volume 27, no. 15, pp. 1853– 1881.

Pekdag, B. (2010). Alternative Methods in Learning Chemistry: Learning with Animation, Simulation, Video and Multimedia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, volume 7, Issue 2, pp, 79-110.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2007 Tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru.

Perpres nomor 8 tahun 2012 Tentang Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia Pilot, A. and Bulte, A. M.W. (2006). The Use of “Contexts” as a Challenge for the

Chemistry Curriculum: Its successes and the need for further development and understanding. International Journal of Science Education, volume 28, no. 9, pp. 1087–1112.

(10)

Potter, N. M. and Overton, T. L. (2006). Chemistry in sport: context-based e-learning in chemistry. Journal Chemistry Education Research and Practice, volume 7, issue 3, pp. 195-202.

Pribadi, B. (2009). Model Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat. Prince, M. and Felder, R. (2007). The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and

Learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, volume 36, no. pp. 14-20. Purwanto, N. (2012). Prinsip-prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung:

Remaja Rosdakarya.

Redshaw, C. H. and Frampton, I. (2014). Optimising inter-disciplinary problem-based learning in postgraduate environmental and science education: Recommendations from a case study. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, volume 9, pp. 97-110.

Roberto, L. C. R. (2011). The Pros and Cons of Problem-Based Learning from the

Teacher’s Standpoint. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, volume 8, issue 1, pp. 1-17.

Rusmono. (2012). Strategi Pembelajaran dengan Problem Based Learning itu Perlu. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Sadia, I. W. (2014). Model-model Pembelajaran Sains Konstrutivistik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Sagala, S. (2008). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran untuk Membantu Memecahkan problematika Belajar dan Mengajar. Bandung: Alfabeta Salome, C. (2013). The Impact of Students’ Attitudes on the Teaching and

Learning of Chemistry in Secondary Schools in Bureti District, Kenya. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), volume 4, issue 4, pp. 618-626.

Satori, D. dan Komariah, A. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Saud, U. S. (2008). Inovasi Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta

Shah, S. B. and Sharma, R. (2014). Chemical Management Practices of Basic Science Teachers. Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications, volume 2, no. 3, pp. 61-85.

Sharaabi, Y., Kesner, M., and Shwartz, Y. (2014). enhancing students’ motivation to learn chemistry. Journal of education, volume 2, issue 2, pp. 100-123.

Shea, K. M. (1993). Chemcom: Chemistry in the Community, Second Edition. Kerper Boulevard: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

(11)

---. (2006) Chemical Literacy: What Does This Mean to Scientists and School Teachers? Journal of Chemical Education, volume 83, no. 10.

---. (2006). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy for assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students. Journal ChemistryEducation Research and Practice, volume 7, issue 4, pp. 203-225.

Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning Difficulties In Chemistry: An Overview. Journal Of Turkish Science Education, volume 4, Issue 2, pp. 2- 20.

Situmorang, et al. (205).The Development of Innovative Chemistry Learning Material for Bilingual Senior High School Students in Indonesia. International Education Studies; volume 8, no. 10, pp. 72-85.

Smits, L. G. A., et al. (2012). An Analysis of Teaching Competence in Science Teachers Involved in the Design of Context-based Curriculum Materials. International Journal of Science Education, volume 34, no. 5, pp. 701–721. Sockalingam, N. and Henk, G. S. (2011). Characteristics of Problems for

Problem-Based Learning: The Students’ Perspective. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, volume 5, no. 1, pp. 6-33.

Standard for Initial Teacher Education, (2006) hal 5. Tersedia http://www.gtcs.org.uk/web/FILES/the-standards/the-standard-for-initial-teacher-education.pdf, tanggal 13 januari2015)

Sudjana, N. dan Ibrahim. (2014). Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sujana, A. (2011). Motivasi Mahasiswa dalam Perkuliahan Konsep dasar kimia di PGSD Konsentrasi IPA. Makalah. Tidak diterbitkan.

Sujana, A., dkk. (2011). Prospek Perkuliahan Konsep Dasar Kimia bagi Mahasiswa PGSD Konsentrasi IPA. Prosiding The Second International Conference on Basic Education. UPI, Sumedang.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2010). Pengembangan Kurikulum: Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sundayana, W.(2014). Pembelajaran Berbasis Tema, Panduan Guru dalam Mengembangkan Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Sungur, S. and Tekkaya, C. (2006). Effects of Problem-Based Learning and Traditional Instruction on Self-Regulated Learning. The Journal of Educational Research,volume 99 no. 5, pp. 307-317.

Tan, O. S. (2003). Problem-Based Learning Innovation Using Problems to Power Learning in the 21st Century. Singapore: Thompson Learning.

(12)

Tarhan, L. and Sese, B. (2013). Problem Based Learning in Acids and Bases:

Learning Achievements and Students’ Beliefs. Journal of Baltic Science Education, volume. 12, no. 5, pp. 565-579.

Tawfik, A., Trueman, R. J., and Lorz, M. M. (2014). Engaging Non-Scientists in STEM Through Problem-Based Learning and Service Learning. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, volume 8, issue 2, pp. 75-84.

Temel, S. (2014). The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service

teachers’critical thinking dispositions and perceptions of problem-solving ability. South African Journal of Education, volume 34, issue 1, pp. 1-20. Tim Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. (2014). Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi. Jakarta:

Direktorat Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan Dirjen Dikti.

Tosun, C. and Senocak, E. (2013).The Effects of Problem-Based Learning on Metacognitive Awareness and Attitudes toward Chemistry of Prospective Teachers with Different Academic Backgrounds. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, volume 38, no. 3, pp. 60-73

Tsankov, N. S. (2012). Students’ Motivation in The Process of Problem-Based Education in Chemistry and Environmental Sciences. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, volume 2, no. 21, pp. 55-66.

Trefil, J. and Hazen, R. M. (2010). Science As Integrated Approach, Sixth Edition. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Ültay, E. and Ültay, N. (2014). Context-Based Physics Studies: A Thematic Review of the Literature. H. U. Journal of Education, volume 29, issue 3, pp. 197-220.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang guru dan dosen

Uzuntiryaki, E. (2007). Turkish Pre-Service Teachers' Beliefs About the Importance of Teaching Chemistry. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, volume 32, issue 4, pp. 70-86.

Walker, A. and Leary, H. (2009). A Problem Based Learning Meta Analysis: Differences Across Problem Types, Implementation Types, Disciplines, and Assessment Levels. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning,volume 3, no. 1, pp. 12-43.

Walsh, A. (2005). The Tutor in Problem Based Learning: A Novice’s Guide. Hamilton, ON Canada: Program for Faculty Development, McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences.

Watters, J. J. & Ginns, I. S. (2012). Developing Motivation To Teach Elementary Science: Effect Of Collaborative And Authentic Learning Practices In Preservice Education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, volume 11, issue 4, pp. 277-313.

(13)

Williams, K., & Williams, C. (2011). Five key ingredients for improving motivation. Journal Research in Higher Education Journal, volume 11, pp. 1-23.

Witte, D. and Beers, K. (2003). Testing of Chemical Literacy (Chemistry in Context in The Dutch National Examinations). Journal Chemical Education International, volume 4, no. 1, pp. 1-15.

Wood, D. F. (2003). Clinical review ABC of learning and teaching in medicine Problem based learning. Journal BMJ, volume 326, issue 8, pp. 328-330.

Yalçinoğlu, P. and Anagün, Ş. S. (2012). Teaching Nature of Science by Explicit

Figur

Memperbarui...

Referensi

Memperbarui...