TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPROVAL SHEET ……… i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ……….. ii
DECLARATION ……….. iii
ABSTRACT ……….. iv
TABLE OF CONTENT ……… v
LIST OF TABLE ……….. vi
LIST OF FIGURES ……….. vii
CHAPTER I ……….. 1
INTRODUCTION ……… 1
1.1 Background ……….. 1
1.2 Objectives of the Study ………... 5
1.3 Significance of the Study ………. 6
1.4 Definition of Key Term ……… 7
1.4.1 Teachers’ Questions ……… 7
1.4.2 Students’ Responses ……… 7
1.4.3 EFL Classroom Activities ……… 8
1.5 The Structure of This Thesis ……… 9
CHAPTER II ………. 11
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ……… 11
2.1 Teachers’ Questions ……….……… 11
2.1.1 Questions ………..……..………….. 12
2.1.2 The Purposes of the Questions ………....………… 13
2.1.3 The Function of Questions ……….. 14
2.1.4 The Types of Teachers’ Questions ……….. 14
2.2 Teachers’ Questionsand EFL Classroom Activities …….. 18
2.2.1 Classroom Interaction and Questioning …… …….. 21
2.3 Questioning Strategies ……….………. 22
2.4 Students’ Responses ……….……… 26
2.5 Previous Studies on Questioning ……….………. 29
CHAPTER III ……… 32
METHODOLOGY ……….. 32
3.1 Research Design ……… 32
3.3 Research Setting and Participants .……… 34
3.4 Data Collecting Techniques ……….. 37
3.4.1 Observation ………. 37
3.4.2 Interview ………. 39
3.4.3 Video Recording ………. 40
3.5 Data Analyzing Techniques ………... 41
CHAPTER IV ……….. 45
DATA PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ………. 45
4.1 Teachers’ Questions and Students’ Responses ………….. 45
4.1.1 Knowledge Question ……… 47
4.1.2 Comprehension Question ………. 53
4.1.3 Application Question ……… 57
4.1.4 Inference Question ……….. 61
4.1.5 Analysis Question ……… 64
4.1.6 Synthesis Question ……… 67
4.1.7 Evaluating Question ………. 71
4.2 Questioning Strategies in EFL Classroom ………. 81
4.2.1 Repeating ………. 82
4.2.2 Rephrasing ……….. 85
4.2.3 Simplifying……… 86
4.2.4 Decomposition ………. 88
CHAPTER V ………. 102
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ………….. 102
5.1 Conclusions ……….. 102
5.2 Recommendation ………. 105
REFERENCES ……….. 106
LIST OF TABLES
1. Table 1 Questioning Patterns of Teachers ……… 13 2. Table 2 Levels Thinking with Bloom’s Taxonomy and
Cognitive Processes ……….. 18
[image:3.595.124.486.159.555.2]LIST OF FIGURES
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
The study about questioning and students’ response to the teachers’
questions in English Foreign Language (EFL) classroom is challenging because
question plays role to the developing of teaching strategy. Teacher question has
been the focus of research for many years (Gerot, 1989, cited in Nunan, 1991:
192) because questioning plays crucial role in classroom instruction and in the
educational process that has been identified as an important aspect of classroom
interaction in teaching learning situation that teacher can display, draw reference
from, comprehend, confirm and clarify the students’ knowledge (Willen, 1987; Sadker and Sadker, 1990).
In the teaching and learning processes, teacher questioning is the primary
instigating aspect that occurs during the lesson. Research shows that teachers need
to ask a lot of questions to initiate this process. Lourdusamy (2005: 34) supported
that one interactive routine that often happens in the classroom is the
question-and-answer method that is used by the teacher during the lesson to monitor the
understanding of the students and to seek their views and opinions. The
interactive question-and-answer routine creates a communicative situation which
depends on how teacher initiates the interaction and applies the right type of
Questioning helps teacher to build an interactive activity to improve
students’ ability in communication. In language learning, the interactive and
dynamic teaching and learning processes become the main aspects in creating
conducive language learning that will promote students achievement (Rosenshine
cited in Brualdi, 1998).
In traditional teaching and learning process where teacher dominates the
classroom activity, it is useless to create an interactive activity because the teacher
always gives lengthy explanations and lectures, drills repetitively, and makes too
many judgments about the students’ answers (Gebhard, 1996: 49). This statement
is also supported by Johnson (2001) who says that some teachers in a traditional
teaching start by giving the student declarative knowledge on the chosen topic and
telling them about what they have to do. Long and Sato (1983) cited in Nunan
(1986: 194) also found that teachers asked more display questions and fewer
referential questions. It can be seen that teachers tend to use more
low-level-cognitive question than higher-level-low-level-cognitive questions (Brualdi, 1998).
Foreign language learning must include the development of children’s
basic communication abilities in English by encouraging enjoyment and
motivation in learning to build an interactive teaching and learning (Pinter, 2009:
99). Teacher should be aware to use the higher-level-cognitive questions to rise
activities that involves attention, noticing and understanding to the subject by
creating question-and-answer method (Thornbury, 205:41) This kind of question
requires students to use higher order thinking or reasoning skills. This statement is
teacher question to give students the impetus and opportunity to produce
comfortable language, initiate key language, initiate a chain reaction of students’
interaction and provide the students with opportunities to find out what others
think by hearing what they say.
Questions can also be used to test out students’ awareness of the affect of their behavior in teaching and learning process as Wong (2005: 138) stated that a
misbehaving student may not be aware of the effect his behavior and can help him
learn to behave more appropriately. Suherdi (2009: 157) emphasized that the
composition and proportion of question types, tasking and teacher explanation are
the keys to building language competence, positive attitude, independent and
responsible thinking and personal leadership skills.
The use of various types of teacher questions in classroom is beneficial
to foreign language learning if it can elicit students’ responses. An interactive
classroom environment depends on how students response to the teachers’
questions. If the teacher wants the students, as language target, to master language
skills, the teacher should build the creative and interactive classroom environment
to achieve active participation by the students. Students’ response quality can be evaluated in relation to the teaching learning goals by measuring right word
choice, understanding of the grammar and the feedback quality as well as and also
mastery of the language data (Suherdi, 2009).
The teacher has role to educate students to reach a level of accepted
educational competence (Wettasinghe, 2005: 194) by initiating the interaction to
language teaching learning occurs in conversation as an objective of
understanding and interpreting that can increase achievement among students
(Pinter, 2009; Slavin, 1988; Wong, 2005). The communicative situation in
learning process needs questioning that can initiate a chain reaction of feedback.
Leng (2005: 97) supported that communicative situation creates the dynamic
process that facilitates interaction between students and students, and students and
teachers.
It also provides opportunity to observe student process of thinking.
When students respond to the teachers’ questions, teacher takes the response as
the feedback to gain achievement in language teaching and learning. Questioning
pushes the reaction as the feedback. The feedback can be stated as students’
responses to the teacher’s questions to build interactive teaching and learning process. Interactive teaching and learning depends on how a teacher uses the right
strategy to create an interactive condition when using questioning methods.
This study was conducted to find out the answers to the following
research questions:
1. What questions do the teachers usually use in EFL classroom to
elicit students’ responses?
2. How do students respond to the teachers’ questions during teaching
learning process?
3. What strategies do the teachers apply when the questions are not
understood by the students to create an interactive teaching and
1.2 Objectives of the Study
Questioning strategy is not a new research topic; however it is still an
interesting and pertinent issue in regard to the development of language teaching
and learning research. This statement was supported by Walsh (2006) who claims
that the purpose of searching the teachers’ questions is to promote the awareness
of teacher in using their questions during classroom interaction. Teachers’ use of
the right type of question and how they apply questioning in order to create
interactive learning processes in the classroom is the true art of the effective
language teacher. Leng (2005:62) described the effective teachers as being
teachers who promote student learning that enhance their cognitive, social
effectiveness and personal development’.
In the language teaching and learning-process, an effective teacher tries
to create an interesting classroom by applying questioning. In teaching and
learning activities teachers sometimes find difficulty in using the appropriate type
of questioning. This situation makes the situation in the class stagnant and boring.
Teachers need to apply questioning strategies that make students feel interested
and active in the classroom activities. Hence the need to investigate how teachers
choose and apply question types and what strategies they use when their questions
are not understood by the students as well as how students respond to the
teachers’ questions.
This study was designed to investigate the teacher questions that are
the methods that are applied by the teachers when their questions are not
understood by the students as well as to investigate the quality of students’
responses to the teachers’ questions during the classroom teaching learning
process.
1.3 Significance of the Study
Teachers’ questions create to determine the quality of students’ learning. From the theory perspective, teachers’ questions can be categorized as knowledge
questions, comprehension questions, application questions, inference questions,
analysis question, synthesis question, and evaluation questions. Teacher will apply
questioning strategies when students do not know how to respond and answer the
questions incorrectly. Some questioning strategies that can be used by the teacher
to elicit the response from student are rephrasing, simplification, repetition and
decomposition.
When teacher applies questioning, teacher needs responses from the
students. The responses from the students can be categorized as verbal or
nonverbal including the use of gestures, facial expressions, eye contact, and
conversational distance.
It is hoped that the answers to this research will help to formulate a new
view and way of thinking about teaching and learning methods and evaluation
techniques. This research will also develop the teaching strategy to create
1.4 Definitions of Key Terms
1.4.1. Teachers’ Questions
Teachers’ questions have a central function in teaching and learning. A
teacher as “a professional question-asker” needs question formulating skill
because types of questions they create determine the quality of students’ learning (Suherdi, 2009: 156). This study includes a description of teacher question from
Kinsela and Bloom (1959) and cited in Brown (1994: 166) which has seven
question and instruction categories consisting of knowledge questions,
comprehension questions, application questions, inference questions, analysis
question, synthesis question, and evaluation questions.
1.4.2 Students’ Responses
During teaching and learning process, teacher questions need responses
from the students. The responses from the students can be categorized as verbal or
nonverbal. Verbal communication can be defined as spoken communication,
including the use of words and intonation to convey meaning, while the nonverbal
communication is defined as “silent” communication, including the use of gestures, facial expressions, eye contact, and conversational distance (Levine,
1993; Suherdi, 2009). Brown (1994: 163) also categorized students’ responses
such as specific response means responding to the teacher within specific and
limited range of available or previously practiced answers, open ended or student
during which a piece of audio-visual equipment, confusion, and laughter means
student is giggling in the class.
From some previous studies, it was noted that the students used verbal
response because they understood the questions from the teacher enabling the
teacher to elicit the response from the students more easily. The students used
non-verbal response because of some burden: e.g. they had difficulty
understanding the questions, they did not know the answer and or they had
psychological problems such as being shy, afraid or nervous. These varied
responses from the students can be categorized as communication feedback.
1.4.3 EFL Classroom Activities
Classroom activities in English Foreign Language (EFL) teaching and
learning are the focus of the research. According to Chavez (2006) - For foreign
language learners, the classroom is the primary forum for them to use and
experience the target language. Similar to Chavez, Pinter also stated (2006) that
teaching English as foreign language is challenging because students learn
English as a school subject and had limited opportunity to practice the language
outside school so that they had no immediate need or clear motivation to use and
learn English.
It is for this reason that teachers have to have the skill to prepare,
organize and manage questioning in order to develop the suitable interactive
classroom activities that can be defined as ideal for creating interaction between
1.5 The Structure of This Thesis
This thesis consists of five chapters introduced separately as follow:
Chapter I introduces to the whole of the study which includes the
background for conducting study on teacher questions and then presents the
research questions and the purposes of the present study. At the end of this chapter
the researcher presents the key terms most frequently used in this study and the
description of the thesis structure.
Chapter II discusses the theoretical views on which the present study is
based. The theoretical views include the nature of questioning in classroom
teaching learning interaction as well as the types of questions, the students’
responses, and also the questioning strategies employed when the questions are
not understood by the students. Finally, this chapter ends by presenting some
related studies conducted by a number of researchers concerning the use of
questions in classroom language learning.
Chapter III constitutes the methodological aspect of this thesis. In this
section, the researcher elaborates on the methodological issues of the present
study. The elaboration includes the research design, research method, research
validity, participants, research setting, techniques of gathering data, and
techniques of analyzing data respectively.
Chapter IV presents the findings and discussion. This analysis is
presented in sequence starting from types of teacher questions and student
their questions were not understood by the students. At the end of each
presentation of the findings the researcher draws conclusions in relation to
specific research questions.
Chapter V is the conclusion or summary. This part summarizes the
findings obtained from the present study. At the end of this section, the researcher
provides recommendations for conducting further related studies based on topical
limitations of the present study and puts forward some suggestions for the further
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
This research is an attempt to seek answers to a number of phenomenon
or aspects relating to where teachers asked questions and how students responded
to them. The research into teachers‟ questions and students‟ responses in the EFL
classroom includes details of the research design, research validity, the
participants, the research setting, techniques of gathering data, and technique of
analyzing data respectively.
3.1. Research Design
This research applied a qualitative research design. The reason for using
qualitative design is that this design is an appropriate way to explore daily
behavior, in this case the behavior of teacher and students in classroom. In
qualitative research, the researcher tries to understand participants‟ experiences
with the central focus of the study in natural setting that refers to the ordinary,
everyday worlds of participants (Heigham and Croker, 2009).
There are several methods in qualitative research such as ethnography,
phenomenology, grounded theory and case study (Alwasilah, 2008). This research
ended when the researcher found the saturated data in the data collecting process
(Sugiyono, 2009). The transferability of its findings would be limited to the
context of the present study.
This research used descriptive case study style because the researcher
gain a deeper understanding of a case or phenomenon with procedural descriptive
data viewed as part of a whole (Hood, 2009; Bogdan and Taylor, 1975). This
statement similar to that of Creswell who stated that:
Case study in which the researcher explores a single entity or phenomenon (“the case”) bounded by time and activity a program, event, process, institution, or social group and collects detailed information by using a variety of data collection procedures during a sustained period of time (1994, 12).
The research about teachers‟ questions and students‟ responses in the
EFL classroom was a case study because the researcher presented a description on
teacher questioning that is used during the process of teaching and learning
English in classroom setting. For this purpose the researcher applied a case study
which is part of descriptive method to find information from a research object that
is bounded by time.
3.2 Establishment of Trustworthiness
The researcher used some techniques suggested by Rallis and Rossman
(2009) included:‟ prolonged engagement, triangulation, and participant validation‟
to ensure validity in this research. Prolonged engagement or „being there‟ was
used because of the accessibility of the researcher to the research field. The
researcher was present and spent time with the participants over a five year period
in the setting so that the researcher was able to make a detailed research of the
target phenomenon.
Triangulation was used for constructing validity (Alwasilah, 2000) and
study used interviews, observations and video recording. The triangulation
carried out based on interviews with teachers and students and also classroom
observation to catch all questioning- answering activities. This study was
validated by presenting detailed descriptions on the process and the setting based
on the field notes during the observation.
This study also took another step to ensure validity of procedure in the
form of participant validation. Participant validation was conducted as member
checking. The researcher made the participant check in transcribing and
interpreting the video recorded data. The participants were asked to make sure that
the transcription was valid based on the recorded data and whether they identified
questions in the transcription as questions or not so that the researcher and the
participants had the same perception in determining the utterances as questions or
not.
This study used these techniques to enable the researcher to maintain the
quality of data gathering and subsequent analysis. The researcher used these
techniques according to situation and condition in field research so that the
researcher could explore daily behavior and students in classroom, and understand
participants‟ experiences with the central focus of the study in natural setting.
3.3. Research Setting and Participants
This study was conducted in a Public Senior High School located in
Bandung. The reason for choosing this school was the accessibility of the
The first group was XI Natural Science which consisted of nine classes. The
second group was XI Social Science which consisted of two classes. These two
groups (Social and Natural Science) were at the first semester of academic year
2011/2012 and the teaching-learning was conducted in morning shift from 6.30
am to 01.30 pm. The students received English lessons twice a week.
This research involved two English teachers, both female, to get the data
of teacher questioning. The fact that these two participants were the colleagues of
the researcher enabled the researcher to maintain and utilize this close
relationship. Both participants are certified teachers. Those two teachers were
coded as teacher A and teacher B. They had been teaching English for more than
ten years and had broad experience in teaching English.
Teacher A has been teaching in the research field for about more than 15
years. She graduated from a local university majoring in English after attaining a
Diploma degree (D3) in the same university and passed the teacher certification in
2009 with a good grade. During the research process she was class teacher for
class XI Natural Science 6. She applied teaching and learning method based on
her experiences and combined it well with the latest curriculum.
Teacher B got a Diploma (D2) in 1982 from a local university that led
on to her becoming a Junior High School teacher. She has S1 degree from two
local state universities majoring in Communication in 1991 and English Education
in 2000 and she has a Management Magister degree from a private university in
Bandung. She has been teaching English in research location since 2009. During
passed the teacher certification in 2008 with a good grade because of her teaching
achievement in another Senior High School. With her strong education
background, she has been able to apply a variety of techniques to the teaching and
learning process.
Meanwhile, students who participated in this research were involved 90
students divided into two groups of students. The first group was Class XI Natural
Science which consisted of nine classrooms. The students were selected into this
classes based on their existing group. They were selected based on their rank
when they were in the last semester of the first year. They showed the best
achievement in most subjects because the input came from the highest ranked
students in the school. In this regard they had been classified as gifted students as
they were from the high achiever group of students.
The second group was class XI Social Science which consisted of two
classrooms. Some of them had other activities outside school and were busy in
doing activities in sports, art, etc. so that they were sometimes absent from the
class to take part in matches or competitions etc. This situation made them lower
achievers by comparison to the other class.
The data also collected when the students were in the second year of
Senior High School in the academic 2011-2012. These two class groups showed
some interesting characteristics especially during observation to collect the data
3.4 Data Collecting Techniques
This study used multiple procedures to collect data including;
observation, interviews and video recording to gather data on problems or issues
and to answer research questions. The researcher used observation for several
reasons, they were that; teachers and students follow familiar routines and
activities in school, observation was used to triangulate or provide additional
evidence for the research study and because the practice of language teaching,
teachers and researcher always requires making sense of a complex situation
(Cowie, 2009:168). This research used in-depth interview to reveal some
information to answer research questions.
3.4.1 Observation
Observation was used as a major technique among data collecting
techniques. This study used observation to make detailed examination of what
types of questions were applied by the teachers, and what were the responses that
have been given by the students to the teachers‟ question, and observed what were
the questioning strategies that have been applied by the teachers when their
questions were not understood by the students in the natural setting of the
ordinary, daily activities at school. This study used observation to make detailed
examination of participants‟ behavior in the natural setting of the ordinary,
everyday world of participants (Heigham and Croker, 2009: 166).
The researcher used himself as the research instrument to capture the
data that were used to answer the research questions. To investigate teachers‟
watched and made detailed notes details from the back during EFL classroom
activities.
In this research, the researcher observed the participants in their
classroom. The researcher played the role of non-participant observer because the
researcher was in the classroom to collect data only and not to take part in any
classroom activities. The observation were collected from the natural classroom
situation as possible, and watched from the back of the classroom so as not to
interfere in any classroom activities. The field notes were made by the
investigation on the questions that were used by the teacher, the responses from
the students to the teachers‟ questions and some details that were useful to answer
research questions.
The researcher engaged himself in detailed description about the
language learning activities occurring in the classroom. Detailed description refers
to the rich, vivid descriptions and interpretations that researchers create as they
collect data or the writing about a research setting needs to be as detailed and rich
as possible so that readers can feel like they are there with the researcher (Geertz
cited in Heigham and Croker, 2009).
The observations focused on the research questions as the observation
guidelines which were to find out the type of questions that were used by the
teachers in EFL classroom activities, the responses that were presented by the
students to the teachers‟ questions and the questioning strategies that were applied
by the teachers where their questions were not understood by the students. This
teachers who were being investigated by their colleague. According to Heigham
and Croker (2009: 169) being observed can stir up visceral responses in many
teachers especially where being observed by a colleague.
This study conducted 24 observations, 12 observations were made on
each group (Natural Science and Social Science classes). During the observation,
all participants taught different topics. In class XI Natural Science class, the
teacher taught Genre Narrative at first, while in class XI Social class the teacher
taught Genre Analytical Exposition. Before observing each class, the teacher
introduced the researcher to the students and then the observer took place in the
back of the class. During the observations, the researcher made field notes of all
the classroom activities and used the researcher himself as the research
instruments to make description from the research activity during the classroom
activities.
3.4.2 Interview
This research used interviews only to gain specific information about
teachers‟ understanding of what types of questions that were used in their
classrooms. Interviews were used to support the data gained from observation and
video-recording techniques. Interview was used through verbal interaction
between interviewer and respondent directly (Sevilla, 1992). Similar to Nasution
(1982) that interview is classified as verbal communication to collect information.
This research used opened and closed interviews. The interview was
while closed interview has been done when researcher asked some questions and
the subject did not know or realize about the interview (Moleong, 2004; Heigham
and Croker, 2009).
The opened interview was used in the classroom or teachers‟ room after
observation or video-recording techniques to discuss about the situation in the
classroom. The researcher asked some questions to the participants to support the
data from observation and video-recording about the information that could not be
revealed from those techniques. The participants knew and realized being
interviewed so that this process can be classified as the open interview technique.
The closed interview technique was used to collect the data from
students about the reason of their responses to the teachers‟ questions. The closed
interview is used when the students were asked in informal situation, and they did
not realize that they were being interviewed by the researcher because the
researcher asked the questions several days after observation and video-recording
techniques. The interviewed was done in the middle of daily conversation.
3.4.3 Video Recording
The data collection most were taken from observation in natural
classroom situation as possible where the researcher watched from the back of the
classroom and made the field notes about the questions that were used by the
teacher, the responses from the students to the teachers‟ questions and some
To support the data collection, this study conducted the video recording
to catch all the teaching and learning process in the classroom so that the
researcher can collect the data from the specific activities. Video recording was
also used to interpret some objectives features that the researcher was not being
influence of the classroom activities circumstance.
The researcher sat and watched in the back of the class while the data
from video recording were taken by one of the students. Video recording was not
used in entire research process. The study conducted four (4) video recording
techniques because of the limited source of systems during research collecting
data. Video recording was used only when the participants applied questioning in
the classroom. Video recording was off when the participants involved in writing
and drama or role play activities. Along the collecting data the researcher
concerns with the relationship among colleagues. The researcher always tries to
keep good relationship because sometimes being observed can stir up visceral
responses in many teachers, especially observed by a colleague (Cowie, 2009).
3.5 Data Analyzing Techniques
This research collected the data from video-recorded, observation,
and interview techniques. The data from video-recorded and observation were
categorized and analyzed, while the information from interview was used to
support the data from video-recording and observation techniques. There were
From field notes observations, the researcher made description of each
observation based on the observation guidelines during the observation. The result
of the description will be used to provide more detail context when classifying
types of questions and interpreting the meaning of certain utterances.
First, the researcher counted the frequency of teacher questions that were
applied by the teachers in their classrooms based on the framework of Brown
(2001) questions categories. The categories are Knowledge question,
Comprehension questions, Application questions, Inference questions, Analysis
questions, Synthesis questions, and Evaluating questions. The next step was
arranging the hierarchy of teachers‟ questions based on the frequency of
questions, into the table of teachers‟ questions frequency to find out which
questions mostly used by the teachers in their classrooms.
After arranging the hierarchy of questions, the next step was analyzed
the response from the students. The students‟ responses can be categorized verbal
communication as spoken communication, including the use of words and
intonation to convey meaning, while the nonverbal communication including the
use of gesture, facial expression, eye contact, and conversational distance.
The last step was categorizing the questioning strategies that were used
by the teachers when their questions were not understood by the students. The
researcher analyzed the field notes to find out which teacher questions could elicit
student responses and which ones should be applied the questioning strategies
From video-recording data, the researcher made transcription and gave
several codes to indicate specific features of the transcription. The researcher
applied codes T for teacher, S for one student, Ss for many students, “*” For
pausing, “….” for no response, and for non- verbal responses.
The researcher made classification of the utterances into two categories,
teacher questions category and student responses category. After all the utterances
have been categorized, then the researcher classified all the teacher questions
based the taxonomy of question which adapted from the framework of Brown
(2001). The researcher analyzed the transcription to find out which teacher
questions could elicit student responses and which ones could get inappropriate
responses.
The next step was categorizing the questioning strategies from the
transcriptions of video-recording. The transcription were coded which questioning
strategies that were used by the teachers when their questions were not understood
by the students. The researcher analyzed the transcriptions to find out which
teacher questions could elicit student responses and which ones should be applied
the questioning strategies such as rephrasing, simplification, repetition, and
decomposition.
The next step was analyzed the response from the students. The
students‟ responses can be categorized as communication feedback. The feedback
from the students can be verbal and nonverbal communication (Suherdi, 2009,
Brown, 1994, and Levine, 1993). In teaching and learning process in the
silent but they give responses by using their body language such as nodding or
shaking their head, facial expression, eye contact, and conversational distance.
Some students‟ responses can be expressed by laughter or use the native language
(Brown, 1994).
The last step was the researcher made the participant check in
transcribing and interpreting the video recorded data. The participants were asked
to make sure that the transcription was valid based on the recorded data and
whether they identified questions in the transcription as questions or not so that
the researcher and the participants had the same perception in determining the
utterances as questions or not.
This research methodology can be figured out from the research
framework that was starting from determining the research background, formulate
the problem into research questions which were showed up because of the lack of
theories and realities, determining the collecting and analyzing data techniques,
presenting the research findings and elaborating with the theories.
This research was design to explore daily behavior of teacher and
students in classroom and presented in details bounded by time. This study was
validated by presenting detailed descriptions on the process and the setting based
on the field notes during the observation, and also took another step to ensure
validity of procedure in the form of participant validation to enable the researcher
to maintain the quality of data gathering and subsequent analysis according to
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This section is the end part of this thesis. In this chapter the researcher
elaborates the conclusions that can be drawn from the present study and some
possible recommendations for conducting further related studies.
5.1 Conclusions
This thesis investigated Teacher Questioning in EFL Classroom
Activities of two English teachers in a Senior High School in Bandung. The
purpose was to identify the teachers’ questions in EFL classroom, students’
response to the teachers’ questions during teaching and learning process in the
classroom, and questioning strategies the teachers applied when the questions
were not understood by the students.
The findings of the present study show that the two participants used
various of questions during their teaching and learning activities. Both
participants taught the same language topics using different materials during their
EFL classroom activities.
The research findings showed that the teachers used questions in the
classroom to achieve a variety of purposes. Teacher A, who teaches in a Natural
Science class, taught the communicative material and generic structure. Teacher B
who used questions in Social Science class, taught how to use analyze statements
topic and the speaker or writer position followed by the main arguments and
elaborated with point supporting development.
From the findings, teacher A used 68% knowledge questions in her EFL
class during research, and teacher B used 81% knowledge questions in her EFL
class during research. This finding supports the previous studies conducted by
Brualdi (1998) that teachers spend most of their time asking low-level cognitive
questions than high-level-cognitive questions. Brualdi (1998) also stated that in
traditional teaching and learning method, most teachers use questions that only
focus on memorizing with sort answer from students as feedback. This type of
question is believed to give small opportunity to students’ understanding and also
gives small opportunity to students’ achievement because it limits them to the
understanding of the subject matter only.
This study also reveals that the students responded with verbal and non
verbal responses. They gave verbal responses by directly answering the questions
with their own words or by making sounds without answering the questions such
as yelling, while the non verbal responses that they gave were smiling, shaking of
the head, nodding or even just being silent. The responses from the student can be
categorized as communication feedback which matches with the statements from
Suherdi (2009), Levine (1993) and Brown (1994) that verbal communication as
spoken communication, includes the use of words and intonation to convey
meaning, give their own ideas, opinions, reaction and or feelings while the non
verbal responses/feedback communication is “silent” communication and or facial
including the use of gestures, facial expressions, eye contact and conversational
distance. The students gave a variety of responses depending on the question that
was given by the teacher and their ability to comprehend its content.
The teachers’ questions facilitated interaction between students and
students, and students and teachers and also provided the opportunity to observe
students’ process of thinking. Teachers’ questions created interactive activity with
the active participation of the students to construct useful representations of
knowledge learning that that engaged students in the lessons. The active
classroom environment was designed to encourage interactive participation and to
increase students’ understanding. This condition was similar to the condition
described by Rosenshine cited in Brualdi (1998) and Pinter (2009) that: learning
occurs in conversation as a result of understanding and interpreting and a good
students-teacher interaction promotes students learning.
This study also reveals that both teachers used various questioning
techniques to modify questions when their questions failed to generate student
responses. Those techniques were repeating, simplifying, rephrasing and
decomposing the questions. In this case, the findings support the study of Wu
(1993). Concerning this finding, it is concluded that questioning strategies were
used when students did not give relevant reaction, and some even simply did not
react at all.
Regarding those findings, it is expected that this study contributes
something to the area of related research and more specifically to the language
reveal only partial views of classroom questioning, it is aimed to give further
insights on the importance of using quality questioning in the language classroom
and promotes teacher awareness of the importance of using questions properly to
facilitate students in learning a foreign language.
As this study involved a small number of participants over a short period
of time research, the holistic influence of teacher questioning to students’
achievement could not be fully revealed. In addition, this research covers three
aspects only, so this research does not provide views from all perspectives of
language learning. To this end, a research involving more participants and
longitudinal research could be recommended to be carried out in the future.
5.2 Recommendations for Further Research
For further investigation the following aspects could be aspects worthy
of being taken into consideration. Firstly, a further study could be focused on
what question produce the most satisfying answers from the students. Such a
study could be directed to aspects of classroom teaching: 1) how a teacher creates
the materials that can produce satisfactory responses from students, and 2) what
kind of classroom activities support the use of different types of questions.
Secondly, further studies can be directed toward the influence of teachers’
questions to classroom interaction. This type of study could focus on how
REFERENCES
Alwasilah, Adeng Chaedar. (2009). Pokoknya Kualitatif. Bandung, Pustaka Jaya.
Akmaludin, (2009). Types of Teacher Questions and Student Respunses in EFL
Classroom Activities. Thesis, Post Graduate School, UPI:
Unpublished.
Allwright, D. (1983). Interaction and Negotiation in Classroom: Their Role in
Learner Development. Available in
http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/groups/crile/docs/crile50allrigh.pdf.
Ang, Rebecca P. “Enhancing Teacher Competencies: Fundamental Issues and Skills in Counselling”. Classroom Management: Facilitation Teaching
and Learning. Ed. Khine, Myint Swe, A. Lourdusamy, Quek Choon
Lang, and Angela F.l. Wong. Singapore. Pearson Prentice Hall. 2005. 219-246.
Bogdan, C.R. and Steven J. Taylor. (1975). Introduction to Qualitative Research
Methods. New York: John Wiley and Son.
Borjars, Kersti, and Kate Burridge (2001). Introduction English Grammar. New York, Oxford University Press Inc.
Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching By Principles. An Interactive Approach to
Language Pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Brock, C.A. (1986). The Effect of Referential Question on ESL Classroom
Discourse. TESOL Quarterly.Vol.20.No.1 March 1986.
Bot, Kees de, Wander Lowie and Marjolijn Verspoor. (2005) Second Language
Acquisition. An Advanced Resource Book. New York, Routledge.
Broughton, Geofrey, Christopher Brumfit, Roger Flavell, Peter Hill, and Anita Pincas. (1980). Teaching English as a Foreign Language. London and New York, Routledge.
Brualdi, Amy C. (1998). Classroom Questions. ERIC Clearinghouse on
Assessment and Evaluation Washington DC.
http://bern.library.nenu.edu.cn/upload/soft/0-article/+025/25113.pdf
Chaudron, C (1998). Progress in Language Classroom Research Evidence from
the Modern Language Journal, 1916-2000. The Modern Language
Chavez, M. (2006). Classroom- language in Use in Teacher-Led Instruction and
Teachers‟ self-Perceive…..International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44, (1), 49-102.
Clegg, A. (1987). Why Question, in Ed. Wilen, William (1987) Question,
Questioning, and Effective Teaching. Washington: National Education
Association of Unitred States.
Cowie, Neil. “Observation”. Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A
Practical Introduction. Ed. Heigham, Juanita, and Robert A. Croker.
London, Palgrave Macmilan. 2009. 165-181.
Creswell, John W. (1994). Research Design Qualitative and Quantitative
Approach. USA. Stage Publication Inc.
Croker, Robert A. “An Introduction to Qualitative Research”. Qualitative
Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction. Ed.
Heigham, Juanita, and Robert A. Croker. London, Palgrave Macmilan. 2009. 3-24.
Darn, S. (2008). Asking Questions. Retrieved on March 28 2009 from http://www. Teachingenglish.org.uk/think/articles/asking-questions
Dawson, Catherine. (2009). Introduction to Research Methods: A Practical Guide
for Anyone Undertaking a Research Project. United Kingdom, How to
Books Ltd.
Emilia, Emi. (2008). Menulis Tesis dan Disertasi. Bandung, Alfabeta.
Ellis, R. (1986). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, K. (1993). Teacher questioning behavior and student learning: What
research says to teachers. (Paper presented at the 1993 Convention of
the Western States Communication Association, Albuquerque, New Mexico). (ERIC Document Reproduction No. 359 572).
Freeman, Donald. “What Makes Research „Qualitative‟? Qualitative Research in
Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction. Ed. Heigham, Juanita,
and Robert A. Croker. London, Palgrave Macmilan. 2009. 25-44.
Gebhard, Jerry G., (2005). Teaching English as a Foreign or Second Language: a
Teacher Self-Development and Methodology Guide. The University of
Gerot, Linda. (1995). Making Sense of Functional Grammar: an Introductory
Workbook. Gerd Stabler Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
Harmer. J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Pearson Education Ltd.
Harmer. J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Third Edition Completely Revised and Updated. Malaysia:Pearson Education Ltd.
Harmer. J. (1991). The Practice of English Language Teaching. New Edition. New York: Longman Group UK Limited.
Hood, Michael. “Case Study”. Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A
Practical Introduction. Ed. Heigham, Juanita, and Robert A. Croker.
London, Palgrave Macmilan. 2009. 66-90.
Johnson, K. (2001). An Introduction to Foreign Language Learning and
Teaching. Longman. Pearson Education. UK
Khine, Mynt Swe and A. Lourdusamy. “Application of Discipline Models in
Classroom Management”. Classroom Management: Facilitatin
Teaching and Learning. Ed. Khine, Myint Swe, A. Lourdusamy, Quek
Choon Lang, and Angela F.l. Wong. Singapore. Pearson Prentice Hall. 2005. 173-192
Krashen, Stephen D. (2008). Language Education: Past, Present and Future.
RELC Journal, 39,187.
Krashen, Stephen D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language
Acquisition. Pergamon Press Inc.
Lang, R.H. and Evans, ND. (2006). Models, Strategies, and Methods for Effective
Teaching. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Larsen, Diane-Freeman. (1986). Techniques and Principles in Language
Teaching. Oxford University Press.
Lynch, T. (1991). Questioning Roles in Classroom. ELT Journal, 45, 201-210.
Lourdusamy, A. “Establishing a Conducive Learning Environment”. Classroom Management: Facilitation Teaching and Learning. Ed. Khine, Myint
Swe, A. Lourdusamy, Quek Choon Lang, and Angela F.l. Wong. Singapore. Pearson Prentice Hall. 2005. 3-22
Lourdusamy, A. “Enhancing Positive Behaviour in The Classroom”. Classroom
Swe, A. Lourdusamy, Quek Choon Lang, and Angela F.l. Wong. Singapore. Pearson Prentice Hall. 2005. 23-44.
Leng, Yeap Lay. “Becoming and Being a Teacher: Attribute of Effective Teachers”. Classroom Management: Facilitation Teaching and
Learning. Ed. Khine, Myint Swe, A. Lourdusamy, Quek Choon Lang,
and Angela F.l. Wong. Pearson Prentice hall. Singapore. 2005. 61-84.
Leng, Yeap Lay. “Repertoire of Knowledge and Skills for Effective Teaching”.
Classroom Management: Facilitation Teaching and Learning. Ed.
Khine, Myint Swe, A. Lourdusamy, Quek Choon Lang, and Angela F.l. Wong. Pearson Prentice hall. Singapore. 2005. 85-116.
Levine, Deena R. (1993). Beyond Language: Cross Cultural Communication. Regents/Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Moleong, Lexy J. (2000). Methodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung, PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Nasution, S. (1997). Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung, Tarsito.
Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative Language Teaching: Making it Work. ELT
Journal, 41, (2).
Nunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology A Textbook for Teacher. London: Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd.
Orlich, Donald, Robert J. Harder, Richard C. Calahan, Donald D. Kauchak, R.A. Pendergrass, Andrew C. Keogh, Constant C. Kravas. (1985). Teaching
Strategies: A Guide to Better Instruction. Toronto, D.C. Heath and
Company.
Ornstein, A.C. (1987). Questioning: The Essence of Good Teaching. NASP
Bulletin, 71-79.
Ornstein, A.C. (1990). Strategies for Effective Teaching. Chicago: HarperCollinsPublishers, Inc.
Pinter, Annamaria. (2006). Teaching Young Language Learners. Oxford University Press.
Rallis, Sharon F., and Gretchen B. Rossman. “Ethics and Trustworthiness”.
Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction.
Richards. JC. (2002). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching.
Richard, Keith. “Interviews”. Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction. Ed. Heigham, Juanita, and Robert A. Croker.
London, Palgrave Macmilan. 2009. 182-199.
Sadker and Sadker (1990). Questioning Skills in (Eds.) Cooper, J.M. (1990)
Classroom Teaching Class, Fourth Edition. Massachusetts: D.C. Heath
Company.
Selinker, Larry and Susan M. Gass. (1994). Second Language Acquisition an
Introductory Course.
Shomoosi, N. (2004). The Effect of Teachers‟ Questioning Behaviour on EFL
Classroom Interaction: A Classroom Research Study. The Reading
Matrix, 4, (2).
Slavin, R. (1988). Educational Psychology: Theory into Practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Snell, Jonathan. (1999). Improving Teacher-Student Interaction in the EFL Classroom: An Action Research Report. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. No. 4, April 1999. http://iteslj.org/
Sugiyono. (2009). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta. Bandung.
Suherdi, Didi. (2009). Mikroskop Pedagogik: Alat Analisis Proses
Belajar-Mengajar. UPI Press. Bandung
Suherdi, Didi. (2009). Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Systemiotic Approach. UPI Press. Bandung.
Thornbury, Scott (1996). Teacher Research Teacher Talk. ELT Journal, 50, 279-289.
Thornbury, Scott, ed. Jeremy Harmer. How to Teach Speaking. England: Pearson Education Limited, 2005.
Walsh, S. (2006). Talking the Talk of TESOL Classroom. ELT Journal 60, 133-141.
Wilen, W. (1987). Effective Questions and Questioning: A Classroom Application, in Ed. Wilen, William (1987). Question, Questioning, and
Effective Teaching. Washington: National Education Association of
Wettasinghe, Cyraine Marissa. “Managing Discipline in Schools and The Classroom”. Classroom Management: Facilitating Teaching and
Learning. Ed. Khine, Myint Swe, A. Lourdusamy, Quek Choon Lang,
and Angela F.l. Wong. Singapore. Pearson Prentice Hall. 2005. 193-218.
Wong, Angela FL. “Using and Managing Teacher-Centred Approaches
Effectively”. Classroom Management: Facilitating Teaching and Learning. Ed. Khine, Myint Swe, A. Lourdusamy, Quek Choon Lang,
and Angela F.l. Wong. Singapore. Pearson Prentice Hall. 2005. 117- 144.
Wu, Kam-Yin (1993). Classroom Interaction and Teacher Questions Revised.
RELC Journal, (24), (22), 49-68. Accessed on May 22 2008.
Yin, K. Robert. Alih Bahasa M. Djauzi Mudzakir. (2002). Studi Kasus (Desain
APPENDIXES
Field Note of observation 1
Day/Date : Wednesday / 2 November 2011 Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher A Lesson material : Narrative Number of students : 45/ xi science 6 Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities:
Teacher A asked the students to introduce themselves. Teacher A asked some questions to the students. The teacher then begins the class by asking the students whether they have finished their narrative assignment. The students were asked to tell about their narrative stories they have chosen from various English newspapers, magazines, books or internet. This task was assigned at the previous meeting a week before this observation. Here, the teacher called the students individually to present their narrative stories in front of her. She also sometimes went around to other students for checking students‟ works and asking many questions about the stories. During this session, the teacher asked the students about stories they interested in, the reasons of choosing them, how they get the sources (newspaper, magazine, internet, books), what the stories are about, and what difficulties they got when making the stories. It was found that Teacher A used more knowledge questions than others.
Field Note of observation 2
Day/Date : Thursday / 3 November 2011 Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher A Lesson material : Narrative Number of students : 45 / xi science 6 Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities:
Lesson two of Teacher A was about students‟ ability in writing Narrative. Here the students in class science 6 were asked to prepare script of their writing individually. At the time of observation, the teacher asked the students to discuss and demonstrate their writing in group. During this discussion and demonstration, the teacher gave suggestions on how to write with the right language features related to this genre. For this, the teacher only gave general instructions and suggestions to each group. More specific suggestions were only given to one group. As a result, there were some data about questioning gained from this lesson.
Field Note of observation 3
Day/Date : Friday / 4 November 2011 Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher A
Lesson material : Narrative Text Through Drama Number of students : 45 / xi science 6
Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities:
Lesson three of Teacher A was about students‟ performance in speaking activities. Here the students in class science 6 were asked to prepare script of drama in group of seven. At the time of observation, the teacher asked the students to discuss and demonstrate the drama in their own group. During this discussion and demonstration, the teacher gave suggestions on how to perform the roles and the intonation of the utterances on the script. For this, the teacher only gave general instructions and suggestions to each group. More specific suggestions were only given to one group. As a result, there were no data about questioning gained from this lesson.
Field Note of observation 4
Day/Date : Wednesday / 9 November 2011 Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher A Lesson material : Narrative Number of students : 45 / xi science 6 Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities:
Field Note of observation 5
Day/Date : Monday / 14 November 2012 Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher B
Lesson material : Analytical Exposition Number of students : 45 / social class
Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities:
Field note of observation 6
Day/Date : Wednesday/ 16 November 2011
Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher B
Lesson material : Analytical Exposition Number of students : 45/ xi social 1
Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities:
Field Note of observation 7
Day/Date :Wednesday/ 23November 2011 Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher B
Lesson material : Analytical Exposition Number of students : 45/ xi social1
Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities:
Field note of observation 8
Day/Date :Wednesday/ 7 December 2011
Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher B Lesson Material : Passive Voice Number of students : 45 / xi social 1 Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities:
Field note of observation 9
Day/Date : Thursday/ 8 December 2011 Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher A Lesson Material : Passive Voice Number of students : 45 / xi science 6 Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities:
Field note of observation 10
Day/Date :Friday/ 9 December 2011 Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher A
Lesson Material : Expressions of making and cancelling an appointment Number of students : 45 / xi science 6
Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities:
Field note of observation 11
Day/Date : Monday/12 December 2011 Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher B
Lesson Material : Expressions of making and cancelling an appointment Number of students : 45 / xi social 1
Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities:
Field note of observation 12
Day/Date : Wednesday/14 December 2011 Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher B
Lesson Material : Expressing satisfaction and dissatisfaction Number of students : 45 / xi social 1
Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities:
Field note of observation 13
Day/Date : Thursday/15 December 2011
Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher A
Lesson Material : Expressing satisfaction and dissatisfaction Number of students : 45 / xi science 6
Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities:
Field note of observation 14
Day/Date : Friday/16 December 2011
Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher B Lesson Material : Report
Number of students : 45 / xi social 1 Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities
Field note of observation 15
Day/Date :Monday/ 19 December 2011
Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher B
Lesson Material : Report
Number of students : 45 / xi social 1 Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities:
Field note of observation 16
Day/Date : Wednesday /4 July 2012
Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher A
Lesson material : Report
Number of students : 45 / xi science 6
Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities :
These lessons were characterized as one of the genre in third semester based on curriculum. This class was attended by forty five students. The lesson was about report. The activities began by listening to the text of report given by the teacher. After that teacher explained the language feature of report then giving written examples on the board. Then the class discussed the sample of the text and
Field note of observation 17
Day/Date :Thursday/12 July 2012
Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher A
Lesson Material : Report
Number of students : 45 / xi science 6
Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities:
Field note of observation 18
Day/Date : Monday/16 July 2012
Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher A
Lesson Material : Expressions of congratulation and compliment
Number of students : 45 / xi science 6 Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities
Field note of observation 19
Day/Date : Wednesday/18 July 2012
Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher B
Lesson Material : Expressions of congratulation and compliment Number of students : 45 / social class
Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities
Lesson nineteen of teacher B was conducted to learn about expression. The
activity was started by showing the dialogue about the charet‟s competition in
Field note of observation 20
Day/Date : Monday/23 July 2012 Time : 2 x 45 minutes Teacher : Teacher A
Lesson Material : Hortatory Exposition Number of students : 45 / Science class Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities
Field note of observation 21
Day/Date :Wednesday/ 25 July 2012 Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher B
Lesson material : Hortatory Exposition Number of students : 45 / Social Class Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities
Field note of observation 22
Day/Date :Wednesday/ 4 August 2012
Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher A
Lesson Material : Spoof
Number of students : 45 / Science class
Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities
Field note of observation 23
Day/Date : Thursday/12 August 2012
Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher A
Lesson Material : Spoof
Number of students : 45 / Science class
Observer : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities
Field note of observation 24
Day/Date : Monday/3 Sept 2012
Time : 2 x 45 minutes
Teacher : Teacher B Lesson material : Spoof
Number of students : 45 / Social Class
Observe : Iskandar Dz
Description of activities
The lessons were characterized as one of the genre in fourth semester based on the curriculum. This class was attended by 45 students. The lesson was about Spoof. The activities began by listening