Dian Budiarti, 2015
A SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ ABILITY AND DIFFICULTIES IN WRITING DISCUSSION TEXTS
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu REFERENCES
Anderson, M., & Anderson, K. (1997). Text types in English 2. Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.
Bangga, L. A. (2013). An investigation of Theme and Theme progression of students’ Exposition texts. Unpublished mini thesis. Indonesia
University of Education.
Ball, D. L., Thames M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special?. Journal of Teacher Education. 59(5), 389-407. Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional competence. In Kunter, M., et al. (Ed.), Cognitive in the Mathematics
classroom and professional competence of teachers (pp. 25-48). New
York: Springer Media.
Baxter, P., & Jack S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report. 13 (4), 544-559.
Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2004). The functional analysis of English. A Hallidayan
approach 2nd edition. London: Arnold.
Bruce, I. (2008). Academic writing and genre: A systematic analysis. New York: Continuum.
Dian Budiarti, 2015
A SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ ABILITY AND DIFFICULTIES IN WRITING DISCUSSION TEXTS
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu
Cameron, D. (2007). The teacher's guide to grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Coffin, C. (1997). Constructing and giving value to the past: An investigation into secondary school history. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (1997). (Eds). Genre and institutions. Social processes in the work-place and school.
London: Continuum.
Coffin, C. (2006). Historical discourse. The language of time, cause, and
evaluation. London: Continuum.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and
evaluating quantitative and qualitative research 4th edition. Boston:
Pearson Education.
Derewianka, B. (2011). A new grammar companion for teachers. Sydey: PETA. Droga, L., & Humphr, S. (2005). Grammar and meaning: an introduction for
primary teachers. Marrickville: Southwood Press.
Ebrahim, S. F. & Khedri, M. (2012). The importance of thematic structure in
students’ writing cohesion. Language in India. 12(4), 64-78.
Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Continuum international Publishing Group
Dian Budiarti, 2015
A SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ ABILITY AND DIFFICULTIES IN WRITING DISCUSSION TEXTS
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu
Emilia, E. (2005). A critical genre-based approach to teaching academic writing
in a tertiary EFL context in Indonesia. Unpublished Ph.D.
Dissertation. The University of Melbourne.
Emilia, E. (2010). Teaching writing: developing critical learners. Bandung: Rizqi Press.
Emilia, E. (2011). Pendekatan genre-based dalam pengajaran Bahasa Inggris:
petunjuk untuk guru. Bandung: Rizki Press.
Emilia, E. (2014). Introducing functional grammar. Bandung: Pustaka Jaya. Emilia, E., Hermawan, B., & Tati, D. (2008). A genre-based approach and the
2006 curriculum of English. Action research in a state junior high
school in Bandung, Wes Java, Indonesia. A research report, submitted to the English Department, Indonesia University of Education.
Fadda, H. (2012). Difficulties in academic writing: from the perspctive of King Saud University postgraduate students. English Language Teaching. 5(1), 123-130.
Fairclough, N. (2004). Analysing discourse. New York: Routledge.
Farooq, S., Hassan, M., & Wahid, S. (2012). Opinion of second language learners about writing difficulties in English Language. South Asian Studies: A
Research Journal of South Asian Studies. 27(1), 183-194.
Fauziah, N. (2014). Identifying students’ ability and difficulties in writing
hortatory exposition Text. Unpublished mini thesis. Indonesia
Dian Budiarti, 2015
A SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ ABILITY AND DIFFICULTIES IN WRITING DISCUSSION TEXTS
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu
Fawcett, R. (2008). Invitation to systemic functional linguistics: the Cardiff
grammar as an extension and simplification of Halliday’s systemic
functional grammar. London: Equinox.
Feez, S., & Joyce, H. (1998). Writing Skills. Phoenix: Phoenix Education Pty Ltd. Fontaine, L. & Kodratoff, Y. (2003). The role of thematic and concept texture in
scientific text: comparing native and non-native writers of English.
Advance online publication. Retrieved from www.cardiff.ac.uk/encap/ Fontaine/thematic-concept.pdf
Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education. Interaction and practice. London: SAGE Publications.
Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. Australia: Gerd Stabbler.
Gough, J. (2012). Discussion text: stage 2. Leichhardt: Blake Education.
Hakim, A. (2015). Contribution of competence teacher (pedagogical, personality, professional competence and social) on the performance of learning.
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES). 4(2),
1-12.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). Introduction to functional
grammar. Great Britain: Oxford University Press.
Dian Budiarti, 2015
A SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ ABILITY AND DIFFICULTIES IN WRITING DISCUSSION TEXTS
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu
Heigham, J., & Croker R. A. (Ed.). (2009). Qulitative research in applied
linguistics: A practical introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Herrington, A., & Moran, C. (2005). Genre across the curriculum. Utah: Utah State University Press.
Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. London: Pearson Education, Ltd.
Imtihani, N. (2010). Genre analysis in the frame of systemic functional linguistic.
Humaniora 22(1), 86-93.
Kizilaslan, I. (2011). ELT student teachers’ competence for teaching language skills: A qualitative exploration. International Journal of Social
Sciences and Humanity studies. 3(1), 161-169.
Lee, N. & Tajino, A. (2008). Understanding students’ perceptions of difficulty with academic writing for teacher development: a case study of the
University of Tokyo writing program. Advance online publication.
Retrieved from http://www.highedu.kyoto-u.ac.jp/kiyou/data/kiyou14/ 01_nancy.pdf
Lock, G. (1996). Functional English grammar: An introduction for second
language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lu, A. (2012). Transitivity shifts in academic writing. The Asian EFL Journal
Quarterly. 14(4), 107-133.
MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (2008). Handbook of writing
Dian Budiarti, 2015
A SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ ABILITY AND DIFFICULTIES IN WRITING DISCUSSION TEXTS
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu
Macken-Horarik, M. (2002). Something to shoot for. In A. M. Johns (2002). (Ed).
Genre in the classroom. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Publishers.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: system and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing.
Martin, J. R., Mathiessen, C.M.I.M., & Painter C. (1997). Working with functional
grammar. London: Arnold.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Genre relations: mapping culture. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitatve research and case study applicatios in education.
Revised and expanded from: Case study research in education. San
Fransiso: Jossey-Bass.
Moreno, A. I., & Cerezo, P. H. (2011). Secondary school students’ errors when writing English: Analysis of the interaction of age, language level,
linguistic levels and types of error. Hawaii International Conference
on Arts and Humanities.
Neale, A. C. (2002). More delicate Transitivity: extending the PROCESS TYPE system, networks for English to include full semantic classifications.
Unpublished thesis. Cardiff University.
Richards, J. C. (2011). Competence and performance in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2011). Exploring teacher competence in language teaching. The
Dian Budiarti, 2015
A SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ ABILITY AND DIFFICULTIES IN WRITING DISCUSSION TEXTS
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu
Rizan, et al. (2012). An investigation of teachers’ pedagogical skills and content knowledge in a content-based instruction context. Indonesian Journal
of Applied Linguistics. 1(2), 75-90.
Saragih, A. (2006). Bahasa konteks sosial. Medan: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Medan.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: a functional linguistics
perspective. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Tapia, P. N. (2012). Writing competence as an outcome in language teaching bachelor degree programs: a comparative analysis in five latin American countries. Revista Complutense de Educación. 23(2), 317-329.
Thompson, G. (1996). Introducing functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Unsworth, L. (2000). Investigating subject-specific literacies in school learning. In L. Unsworth (2000). (Ed). Researching language in schools and
communicties. London: Cassell.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yuwanti, M. C. (2014). Error analysis on the argumentative essays written by the
fourth semester students of study program of English. Unpublished
