• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

24. Liver cirrhosis Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects Department of Internal Medicine Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg University, Sweden

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Membagikan "24. Liver cirrhosis Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects Department of Internal Medicine Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg University, Sweden"

Copied!
50
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Nurdjanah S. Sirosis hati. Dalam: Sudoyo WA, Setiyohadi B, Alwi I, et al,

editor. Buku ajar ilmu penyakit dalam jilid I. Edisi keempat. Jakarta: Pusat

Penerbitan Departemen Ilmu Penyakit Dalam FK UI, 2007.

2. Thorn, Adams, Braunwald, Isselbacher, & Petersdorf. Harrison's Principles of

Internal Medicine. Edisi IX. Jakarta Utara: Penerbit Buku Kedokteran; 1991.

3. The Global Burden Of Deseases 2004 [database on the internet]. WHO. 2008

[cited 16 November 2013]. Available from: www.who.int/evidence/bod.

4. Liver cirrhosis mortality rates in Britain from 1950 to 2002 an analysis of

routine data [database on the internet]. Leon,D. 2006 [cited 2 Desember

2013]. Available from: http:// www.thelancet.com.

5. Statistics About Liver of Cirrhosis [database on the internet]. NCHS. 2003

[cited

5

November

2013].

Available

from:

http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/c/cirrhosis_of_the_liver/stats.htm.

6. National Vital Statistics Reports [database on the internet]. Xu dkk. 2010

[cited

16

Desember

2013].

Available

from:

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/Vitalstatsonline.htm.

7. Muttaqin, A., & Sari, K. Gangguan Gastrointestinal. Jakarta: Penerbit

Salemba Medika; 2011.

8. Farrell, G. C., 2008, Cirrhosis in Asians: Less common than in Europeans

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Volume 23, Issue 4, pages 508–

511 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi.

9. Kusumobroto O Hernomo. Sirosis Hati dalam buku ajar Ilmu Penyakit Hati.

Edisi I. Jakarta: Jayabadi; 2007.

10. Karina. Faktor Risiko Kematian Penderita Sirosis Hati Di RSUP Dr. Kariadi

Semarang Tahun 2002–2006, Jurnal Media Medika Muda [internet]. 2007

[cited

2014

Maret

11].

Available

from:

http://eprints.undip.ac.id/view/divisions/sch=5Fmed/2007.html#group_K.

11. Sulaiman A. Gasrtoenterologi Hepatologi. Jakarta: CV. Sagung Seto; 1997.

(2)

12. Global Burden of Viral Hepatitis [database on the internet]. WHO Geneva.

2010

[cited

12

Desember

2013].

Available

from:

http://

www.who.int/evidence/bod.

13. Hepatitis B and HIV Coinfecton Clinical Protocol [database on the internet].

WHO European Region. 2010 [cited 16 Desember 2013].

14. Laporan Hasil Riset Kesehatan Dasar RISKESDAS Indonesia [database on

the internet]. Departemen Kesehatan. 2007 [ cited 2 Januari 2014].

15. Profil Kesehatan 2008 [database on the internet]. Departemen Kesehatan.

2009 [cited 2 Januari 2014]. Available from: http//www.depkes.go.id .

16. Setiawati, M. Perbandingan Validitas Maddrey’s Discriminant Function dan

Skor Child-Pugh dalam Memprediksi Ketahanan Hidup 12 Minggu pada

Pasien Sirosis Hepatis. Semarang: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas

Diponegoro; 2009.

17. Deep vein thrombosis in patient with cirrhosis [database on the internet].

Lesmana, dkk. 2009 [cited 16 Januari 2014]. Available from:

http://www.who.int/research/en.

18. Simamora, C. T. Hubungan Komplikasi, Skor Child-Turcotte dan Usia Lanjut

Sebagai Faktor Resiko Kematian Pada Pasien Sirosis Hati di RSUD Dr.

Soedarso Pontianak. Pontianak; 2013.

19. Malau, A. S. Karakteristik Penderita Sirosis Hati Yang Dirawat Inap Di

Rumah Sakit Martha Friska Medan Tahun 2006-2010. Medan; 2011.

20. Report of The Regional Committee for the Eastern Mediterranean Fifty-sixth

Session Fez, Morocco 5–8 October 2009 [database on the internet]. Mohsni.

2009 [cited 6 Pebruari 2014]. Available from: http://search.who.int/.

21. Statistics by Country for Cirrhosis of the liver [database on the internet]. US

Census Bureau, International Data Base. 2005 [cited 11 Januari 2014].

Available from:

http://www.cureresearch.com/c/cirrhosis_of_the_liver/stats-country_ printer.htm.

22. Ndraha. The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and

Digestive Endoscopy. Volume 10, Number 3; 2009.

(3)

24. Liver cirrhosis–Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects Department of Internal

Medicine Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg University, Sweden

[database on the internet]. Gunnarsdottir. 2008 [cited 3 Pebruari 2014].

Available from:

www.gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/10132/1/Ramen-Avh-SAG.pdf.

25. Rasyid. Temuan Ultrasonografi Kanker Hati Hepatoseluler Hepatoma.

Majalah Kedokteran Nusantara. Volume 39 No 2; 2006.

26. Sulaiman A. Harapan Baru Dalam Penatalaksanaan Sirosis Hati, Dalam

Pertemuan Ilmiah Tahunan Perkembangan Muktahir Ilmu Penyakit Dalam.

Jakarta: Balai Penerbit FK UI; 2003.

27. Death Rates [database on the internet]. WHO. 2004 [cited 8 Pebruari 2014].

Available from: http://www.who.int.

28. Studi Penggunaan Obat Pada Pasien Sirosis Hepatik [database on the internet].

Rencianisari.

2008

[cited

4

Pebruari

2014].

Available

from:

http://adln.lib.unair.ac.id/go.php?id=gdlhub-gdl-s1-2011-.

29. Percentage of total deaths, death rates, age-adjusted death rates for 2007,

percentage change in age-adjusted death rates in 2007 from 2006, and ratio of

age-adjusted death rates, by race and sex for the 15 leading causes of death

for the total population in 2007 [database on the internet]. National Vital

Statistics Reports. 2010 [cited 15 Pebruari 2014]. Available from:

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs.

30. Avunduk, C. Manual of Gastroenterology Diagnosis and Therapy. Edisi IV.

Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.

31. Sherlock S, Dooley J. Disease of the liver and biliary system. Edisi IX.

Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1993: 357-67.

32. Rigas B, Spiro HM. Clinical Gastroenterology: companion book. Edisi IV.

New York: Mc Graw Hill, 1995: 588-611.

33. Global Burden of Diseases in 2002 [database on the internet]. WHO Global.

2008 [cited 9 Pebruari 2014]. Available from: http://www.wpro.who.int.

(4)

34. Arguedes MR, Fallon MB. Cirrhosis of the liver and its complications. In:

Carpenter CCJ, Griggs RC, Loscalzo J, editors. Cecil essentials of medicine.

Edisi XI. Pennsylvania: Saunders, 2004: 411-7.

35. Price S.A. Patofisiologi konsep Klinis Proses-proses Penyakit, Edisi VI.

Jakarta: EGC; 2006.

36. Kayacetin E, Efe D, Dogan C. Portal and splenic hemodynamics in cirrhotic

patients: relationship between esophageal variceal bleeding and the severity

of hepatic failure. Journal of Gastroenterology, 2004; 39: 661-7.

37. Friedman SL, McQuaid KR, Grendell JH. Current diagnosis and treatment in

gastroenterology. 2nd ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill, 2003: 644-62.

38. Porth CM. Pathophysiology: concepts of altered health states. 5th ed.

Philadelphia, 1998: 761-6.

39. Weiss GR. Clinical oncology. Connecticut: Appleton & Lange; 1993.

40. Cardenas A, Arroyo V. Mechanism of water and sodium retension in

cirrhosis and the phatogenesis of ascites. Best Pract Res Clin Endokrinol

Metab 2003; 17: 607-22.

41. Cheney CP, Goldberg EM, Chopra S. Cirrhosis and portal hypertension: an

overview. In: Friedman LS, Keeffe EB, editors. Handbook of liver disease.

2nd ed. China: Churchill Livingstone, 2004: 125-37.

42. Gilroy J. Basic neurology. 3rd ed. New York: Mc Graw Hill, 2000: 517-8.

43. Hassan HA. Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis. Dalam: Adi S, editor. Naskah

lengkap pendidikan kedokteran berkelanjutan XVI. Surabaya: Laboratorium

SMF Penyakit Dalam FK Unair RSUD Dr. Sutomo, 2001: 41-59.

44. Hirlan. Nutrisi enteral dan parenteral pada penderita penyakit hati kronik.

Dalam: Soeroso S, Haryoko W, Setiati TE, Kosim HMS, Triwara B, editor.

Gizi klinik: Nutrisi enteral dan parenteral. Badan Penerbit Universitas

Diponegoro; 1994.

45. Doubatty, AC. 2009. Perbandingan validitas skor mayo end stage liver

disease dan skor child-pugh dalam memprediksi ketahanan hidup 12 minggu

pada pasien sirosis hepatis. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

(5)

46. Shibli, AB; Tachauer, A; Mohanty, SR.; 2006, Outpatient Management of

Cirrhosis, Southern Medicaal Journal, 99 (6), 559-561.

47. Clinical profile of patients with cirrhosis of liver in a tertiary carehospital,

Dharan, Nepal [database on the internet]. Maskey R,

Karki P, Ahmed S V

,

Manandhar D N. 2011 [cited 3 Maret 2014]. Available from:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22364095.

48. Sarin SK, Chari S, Sundaram KR, Ahuja RK, Anand BS, Broor SL. Young

versus adult cirrhosis: a prospective comparative analysis of the clinical

profile, natural course and survival. Gut 1988; 29: 101-7.

49. Etiology of Liver Cirrhosis in Mexico [database on the internet].

Méndez-Sánchez N, Aguilar-Ramírez JR, Reyes A, Dehesa M, Juárez A, Castañeda B,

et

al.

2004

[cited

22

Juli

2014].

Available

from:

http://new.medigraphic.com/cgibin/resumenMainI.cgi?IDARTICULO=12532.

50. Complications of liver cirrhosis [database on the internet]. Wittenburg H,

Tennert U, Berg T. 2011 [cited 22 Juli 2014]. Available from:

http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21611819.

(6)

Lampiran 1. Analisis Univariat beberapa Variabel

NPar Tests

Statistics 303 245 259 226 303 2 60 46 79 2 54.17 4.4606 2.3448 8.1827 10.46 54.00 1.9800 2.3000 5.3000 9.00 11.755 5.92105 .60094 12.46432 7.626 16 .11 .90 -.90 0 81 36.31 4.66 106.30 48 Valid Missing N Mean Median St d. Dev iation Minimum Maximum

Usia Bilirubin Total

Albumin

serum PPT

Lama perawatan

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

303 245 259 226 303 54.17 4.4606 2.3448 8.1827 10.46 11.755 5.92105 .60094 12.46432 7.626 .062 .231 .064 .239 .145 .062 .221 .064 .232 .145 -.055 -.231 -.040 -.239 -.101 1.080 3.620 1.023 3.589 2.522 .193 .000 .246 .000 .000 N Mean St d. Dev iation Normal Parametersa,b

Absolute Positiv e Negativ e Most Extreme Dif f erences Kolmogorov -Smirnov Z Asy mp. Sig. (2-tailed)

Usia Bilirubin Total

Albumin

serum PPT

Lama perawatan

Test distribution is Normal. a.

Calculated f rom data. b.

(7)

Frequency Table

Jenis kel amin

205 67,7 67,7 67,7 98 32,3 32,3 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Laki-laki Perempuan Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent Usia 10 3.3 3.3 3.3 21 6.9 6.9 10.2 79 26.1 26.1 36.3 104 34.3 34.3 70.6 59 19.5 19.5 90.1 30 9.9 9.9 100.0 303 100.0 100.0 < 31 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 61 - 70 > 70 Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent HBV 184 60.7 60.7 60.7 119 39.3 39.3 100.0 303 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent HCV 55 18.2 18.2 18.2 248 81.8 81.8 100.0 303 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent

(8)

NAFL 21 6.9 6.9 6.9 282 93.1 93.1 100.0 303 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Alkohol 303 100.0 100.0 100.0 Tidak Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Lain-lain 59 19.5 19.5 19.5 244 80.5 80.5 100.0 303 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Klasifikasi CHILD-PUGH 15 5,0 6,4 6,4 75 24,8 32,1 38,5 144 47,5 61,5 100,0 234 77,2 100,0 69 22,8 303 100,0 A B C Total Valid Sy stem Missing Total

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent

(9)

Perdarahan var. Esof 59 19,5 19,5 19,5 244 80,5 80,5 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Ensefalopati Hepatikum 66 21,8 21,8 21,8 237 78,2 78,2 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Karsinoma Hepatoseluler 34 11,2 11,2 11,2 269 88,8 88,8 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Sindr. Hepatorenal 5 1,7 1,7 1,7 298 98,3 98,3 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent

(10)

Hematemesis 79 26,1 26,1 26,1 224 73,9 73,9 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Melena 85 28,1 28,1 28,1 218 71,9 71,9 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Ascites 224 73,9 73,9 73,9 79 26,1 26,1 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent

Peritonitis bakterial spontan

1 ,3 ,3 ,3 302 99,7 99,7 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Gastropati HT Porta 39 12,9 12,9 12,9 264 87,1 87,1 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent

(11)

Efusi pleura 38 12,5 12,5 12,5 265 87,5 87,5 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Pneumonia 37 12,2 12,2 12,2 266 87,8 87,8 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent TB paru 5 1,7 1,7 1,7 298 98,3 98,3 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Syok 7 2,3 2,3 2,3 296 97,7 97,7 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent

(12)

Sepsi s 19 6,3 6,3 6,3 284 93,7 93,7 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Penyakit ginjal 10 3,3 3,3 3,3 293 96,7 96,7 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Penyakit jantung 3 1,0 1,0 1,0 300 99,0 99,0 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Survival rate 60 19,8 19,8 19,8 243 80,2 80,2 100,0 303 100,0 100,0 Meninggal Hidup Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent Perut membesar 111 36.4 36.4 36.4 194 63.6 63.6 100.0 305 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent

(13)

Nyeri perut 17 5.6 5.6 5.6 288 94.4 94.4 100.0 305 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Berak darah 32 10.5 10.5 10.5 273 89.5 89.5 100.0 305 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Muntah darah 63 20.7 20.7 20.7 242 79.3 79.3 100.0 305 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Badan lemas 15 4.9 4.9 4.9 290 95.1 95.1 100.0 305 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Penurunan kesadaran 18 5.9 5.9 5.9 287 94.1 94.1 100.0 305 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent

(14)

Mata kuni ng 13 4.3 4.3 4.3 292 95.7 95.7 100.0 305 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Lain2 48 15.7 15.7 15.7 257 84.3 84.3 100.0 305 100.0 100.0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Ensefalopati 32 10.5 44.4 44.4 40 13.1 55.6 100.0 72 23.6 100.0 233 76.4 305 100.0 grade I-I I grade III -IV Total Valid

Sy stem Missing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent Ascites 180 59.0 80.4 80.4 44 14.4 19.6 100.0 224 73.4 100.0 81 26.6 305 100.0 ringan-sedang berat Total Valid Sy stem Missing Total

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent

(15)

Lampiran 2. Analisis Bivariat beberapa Variabel terhadap Survival Rate

Jenis kelamin * Survival rate Crosstabul ation

39 166 205 65,0% 68,3% 67,7% 12,9% 54,8% 67,7% 21 77 98 35,0% 31,7% 32,3% 6,9% 25,4% 32,3% 60 243 303 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 19,8% 80,2% 100,0% Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Laki-laki Perempuan Jenis kelamin Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total

(16)

HBV * Survival rate Crosstabul ation 35 149 184 58.3% 61.3% 60.7% 11.6% 49.2% 60.7% 25 94 119 41.7% 38.7% 39.3% 8.3% 31.0% 39.3% 60 243 303 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rat e % of Total

Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rat e % of Total

Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rat e % of Total Y a Tidak HBV Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total

HCV * Survival rate Crosstabul ation

8 47 55 13.3% 19.3% 18.2% 2.6% 15.5% 18.2% 52 196 248 86.7% 80.7% 81.8% 17.2% 64.7% 81.8% 60 243 303 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rat e % of Total

Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rat e % of Total

Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rat e % of Total Y a Tidak HCV Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total

NAFL * Survi val rate Crosstabulation

3 18 21 5.0% 7.4% 6.9% 1.0% 5.9% 6.9% 57 225 282 95.0% 92.6% 93.1% 18.8% 74.3% 93.1% 60 243 303 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rat e % of Total

Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rat e % of Total

Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rat e % of Total Y a Tidak NAFL Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total

(17)

Alkohol * Survival rate Crosstabul ation 60 243 303 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% 60 243 303 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Tidak Alkohol Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total

Lain-lain * Survi val rate Crosstabulation

18 41 59 30.0% 16.9% 19.5% 5.9% 13.5% 19.5% 42 202 244 70.0% 83.1% 80.5% 13.9% 66.7% 80.5% 60 243 303 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count

% within Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

% within Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

% within Surv iv al rate % of Total Y a Tidak Lain-lain Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total

(18)

Klasifikasi CHILD-PUGH * Survi val rate Crosstabulation 0 15 15 ,0% 8,2% 6,4% ,0% 6,4% 6,4% 4 71 75 7,7% 39,0% 32,1% 1,7% 30,3% 32,1% 48 96 144 92,3% 52,7% 61,5% 20,5% 41,0% 61,5% 52 182 234 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 22,2% 77,8% 100,0% Count

% within Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

% within Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

% within Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

% within Surv iv al rate % of Total A B C Klasif ikasi CHI LD-PUGH Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total

(19)

Usia * Survival rate

Crosstab 1 9 10 2.0 8.0 10.0 1.7% 3.7% 3.3% .3% 3.0% 3.3% 3 18 21 4.2 16.8 21.0 5.0% 7.4% 6.9% 1.0% 5.9% 6.9% 15 64 79 15.6 63.4 79.0 25.0% 26.3% 26.1% 5.0% 21.1% 26.1% 19 85 104 20.6 83.4 104.0 31.7% 35.0% 34.3% 6.3% 28.1% 34.3% 15 44 59 11.7 47.3 59.0 25.0% 18.1% 19.5% 5.0% 14.5% 19.5% 7 23 30 5.9 24.1 30.0 11.7% 9.5% 9.9% 2.3% 7.6% 9.9% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total < 31 31 - 40 41 - 50 51 - 60 61 - 70 > 70 Usia Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests 2.604a 5 .761 2.663 5 .752 1.882 1 .170 303 Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided)

2 cells (16.7%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 1.98.

(20)

Efusi pleura * Survival rate

Crosstab 3 35 38 7.5 30.5 38.0 5.0% 14.4% 12.5% 1.0% 11.6% 12.5% 57 208 265 52.5 212.5 265.0 95.0% 85.6% 87.5% 18.8% 68.6% 87.5% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Y a Tidak Ef usi pleura Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests 3.879b 1 .049 3.069 1 .080 4.649 1 .031 .051 .032 3.866 1 .049 303 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7. 52.

(21)

Pneumonia * Survival rate

Crosstab 15 22 37 7.3 29.7 37.0 25.0% 9.1% 12.2% 5.0% 7.3% 12.2% 45 221 266 52.7 213.3 266.0 75.0% 90.9% 87.8% 14.9% 72.9% 87.8% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Y a Tidak Pneumonia Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests 11.414b 1 .001 9.975 1 .002 9.780 1 .002 .002 .002 11.377 1 .001 303 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7. 33.

(22)

TB paru * Survival rate

Crosstab 0 5 5 1.0 4.0 5.0 .0% 2.1% 1.7% .0% 1.7% 1.7% 60 238 298 59.0 239.0 298.0 100.0% 97.9% 98.3% 19.8% 78.5% 98.3% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Y a Tidak TB paru Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests 1.255b 1 .263 .308 1 .579 2.227 1 .136 .587 .329 1.251 1 .263 303 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is . 99.

(23)

Syok * Survival rate

Crosstab 7 0 7 1.4 5.6 7.0 11.7% .0% 2.3% 2.3% .0% 2.3% 53 243 296 58.6 237.4 296.0 88.3% 100.0% 97.7% 17.5% 80.2% 97.7% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rat e % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rat e % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rat e % of Total Y a Tidak Sy ok Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests 29.020b 1 .000 24.081 1 .000 23.359 1 .000 .000 .000 28.925 1 .000 303 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

1 cells (25.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1. 39.

(24)

Sepsis * Survival rate

Crosstab 18 1 19 3.8 15.2 19.0 30.0% .4% 6.3% 5.9% .3% 6.3% 42 242 284 56.2 227.8 284.0 70.0% 99.6% 93.7% 13.9% 79.9% 93.7% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Y a Tidak Sepsis Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests 71.676b 1 .000 66.730 1 .000 55.730 1 .000 .000 .000 71.439 1 .000 303 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

1 cells (25.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3. 76.

(25)

Penyakit ginjal * Survival rate

Crosstab 4 6 10 2.0 8.0 10.0 6.7% 2.5% 3.3% 1.3% 2.0% 3.3% 56 237 293 58.0 235.0 293.0 93.3% 97.5% 96.7% 18.5% 78.2% 96.7% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Y a Tidak Peny akit ginjal Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests 2.657b 1 .103 1.504 1 .220 2.231 1 .135 .114 .114 2.648 1 .104 303 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

1 cells (25.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1. 98.

(26)

Penyakit jantung * Survival rate

Crosstab 0 3 3 .6 2.4 3.0 .0% 1.2% 1.0% .0% 1.0% 1.0% 60 240 300 59.4 240.6 300.0 100.0% 98.8% 99.0% 19.8% 79.2% 99.0% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Y a Tidak Peny akit jantung Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests .748b 1 .387 .019 1 .891 1.331 1 .249 1.000 .515 .746 1 .388 303 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is . 59.

(27)

Perdarahan var. Esof * Survival rate

Crosstab 7 52 59 11.7 47.3 59.0 11.7% 21.4% 19.5% 2.3% 17.2% 19.5% 53 191 244 48.3 195.7 244.0 88.3% 78.6% 80.5% 17.5% 63.0% 80.5% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Y a Tidak Perdarahan v ar. Esof Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests 2.907b 1 .088 2.319 1 .128 3.197 1 .074 .102 .059 2.897 1 .089 303 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11. 68.

(28)

Ensefalopati Hepatikum * Survival rate

Crosstab 41 25 66 13.1 52.9 66.0 68.3% 10.3% 21.8% 13.5% 8.3% 21.8% 19 218 237 46.9 190.1 237.0 31.7% 89.7% 78.2% 6.3% 71.9% 78.2% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Y a Tidak Ensef alopati Hepatikum Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests 95.157b 1 .000 91.781 1 .000 81.663 1 .000 .000 .000 94.843 1 .000 303 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13. 07.

(29)

Karsinoma Hepatoseluler * Survival rate

Crosstab 5 29 34 6.7 27.3 34.0 8.3% 11.9% 11.2% 1.7% 9.6% 11.2% 55 214 269 53.3 215.7 269.0 91.7% 88.1% 88.8% 18.2% 70.6% 88.8% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Y a Tidak Karsinoma Hepatoseluler Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests .626b 1 .429 .317 1 .573 .668 1 .414 .502 .296 .624 1 .429 303 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6. 73.

(30)

Sindr. Hepatorenal * Survival rate

Crosstab 2 3 5 1.0 4.0 5.0 3.3% 1.2% 1.7% .7% 1.0% 1.7% 58 240 298 59.0 239.0 298.0 96.7% 98.8% 98.3% 19.1% 79.2% 98.3% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Y a Tidak Sindr. Hepatorenal Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests 1.306b 1 .253 .333 1 .564 1.093 1 .296 .258 .258 1.302 1 .254 303 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is . 99.

(31)

Hematemesis * Survival rate

Crosstab 17 62 79 15.6 63.4 79.0 28.3% 25.5% 26.1% 5.6% 20.5% 26.1% 43 181 224 44.4 179.6 224.0 71.7% 74.5% 73.9% 14.2% 59.7% 73.9% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Y a Tidak Hematemesis Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests .198b 1 .656 .079 1 .779 .196 1 .658 .743 .384 .198 1 .657 303 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15. 64.

(32)

Melena * Survival rate

Crosstab 18 67 85 16.8 68.2 85.0 30.0% 27.6% 28.1% 5.9% 22.1% 28.1% 42 176 218 43.2 174.8 218.0 70.0% 72.4% 71.9% 13.9% 58.1% 71.9% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Y a Tidak Melena Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests .141b 1 .708 .046 1 .830 .139 1 .709 .749 .410 .140 1 .708 303 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16. 83.

(33)

Ascites * Survival rate

Crosstab 47 177 224 44.4 179.6 224.0 78.3% 72.8% 73.9% 15.5% 58.4% 73.9% 13 66 79 15.6 63.4 79.0 21.7% 27.2% 26.1% 4.3% 21.8% 26.1% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Y a Tidak Ascites Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests .753b 1 .385 .495 1 .482 .777 1 .378 .417 .243 .751 1 .386 303 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15. 64.

(34)

Peritonitis bakterial spontan * Survival rate

Crosstab 1 0 1 .2 .8 1.0 1.7% .0% .3% .3% .0% .3% 59 243 302 59.8 242.2 302.0 98.3% 100.0% 99.7% 19.5% 80.2% 99.7% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Y a Tidak Peritonitis bakterial spontan Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests 4.063b 1 .044 .576 1 .448 3.252 1 .071 .198 .198 4.050 1 .044 303 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

2 cells (50.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is . 20.

(35)

Gastropati HT Porta * Survival rate

Crosstab 5 34 39 7.7 31.3 39.0 8.3% 14.0% 12.9% 1.7% 11.2% 12.9% 55 209 264 52.3 211.7 264.0 91.7% 86.0% 87.1% 18.2% 69.0% 87.1% 60 243 303 60.0 243.0 303.0 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total Y a Tidak Gastropati HT Porta Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Chi-Square Tests 1.374b 1 .241 .916 1 .339 1.503 1 .220 .288 .170 1.369 1 .242 303 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7. 72.

(36)

Ensefalopati * Survival rate Crosstabulation 5 27 32 12.5% 84.4% 44.4% 6.9% 37.5% 44.4% 35 5 40 87.5% 15.6% 55.6% 48.6% 6.9% 55.6% 40 32 72 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 55.6% 44.4% 100.0% Count

% within Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

% within Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

% within Surv iv al rate % of Total grade I-II grade III-IV Ensef alopati Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total

Ascites * Survival rate Crosstabul ation

36 143 179 76.6% 81.3% 80.3% 16.1% 64.1% 80.3% 11 33 44 23.4% 18.8% 19.7% 4.9% 14.8% 19.7% 47 176 223 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 21.1% 78.9% 100.0% Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rate % of Total ringan-sedang berat Ascites Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total

(37)

Klasifikasi CHILD-PUGH * Survival rate

Tahun * Survival rate Crosstabulation

22 90 112 36.7% 37.0% 37.0% 7.3% 29.7% 37.0% 22 101 123 36.7% 41.6% 40.6% 7.3% 33.3% 40.6% 16 52 68 26.7% 21.4% 22.4% 5.3% 17.2% 22.4% 60 243 303 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 19.8% 80.2% 100.0% Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rat e % of Total

Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rat e % of Total

Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rat e % of Total

Count

% wit hin Surv iv al rat e % of Total 2010 2011 2012 Tahun Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total Crosstab 0 15 15 .0% 8.2% 6.4% .0% 6.4% 6.4% 4 71 75 7.7% 39.0% 32.1% 1.7% 30.3% 32.1% 48 96 144 92.3% 52.7% 61.5% 20.5% 41.0% 61.5% 52 182 234 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 22.2% 77.8% 100.0% Count

% within Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

% within Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

% within Surv iv al rate % of Total

Count

% within Surv iv al rate % of Total A B C Klasif ikasi CHI LD-PUGH Total Meninggal Hidup Surv iv al rate Total

(38)

Chi-Square Tests 26.949a 2 .000 33.354 2 .000 24.502 1 .000 234 Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided)

1 cells (16.7%) hav e expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 3.33.

(39)

Lampiran 3. Tabel Frekuensi dari beberapa Variabel

Variabel Frekuensi Prosentase

Jenis kelamin Laki-laki 205 67,7 Perempuan 98 32,3 Usia < 31 tahun 10 3,3 31 – 40 tahun 21 6,9 41 – 50 tahun 79 26,1 51 – 60 tahun 104 34,3 61 – 70 tahun 59 19,5 > 70 tahun 30 9,9 Keluhan utama Perut membesar 111 36,4 Nyeri perut 17 5,6 Berak darah 32 10,5 Muntah darah 63 20,7 Badan lemas 15 4,9 Penurunan kesadaran 18 5,9 Mata kuning 13 4,3 Lain2 48 15,7 Etiologi Virus HBV 184 60,7 HCV 55 18,2 HBV dan HCV 17 30,9 Non Virus NAFL 21 6,9 Lain-lain 59 19,5 Klasifikasi CHILD-PUGH A 15 6,4 B 75 32,1 C 144 61,5 Komplikasi

(40)

Ensefalopati Hepatikum 66 21,8 Karsinoma hepatoseluler 34 11,2 Sindrom hepatorenal 5 1,7 Hematemesis 79 26,1 Melena 85 28,1 Ascites 224 73,9

Peritonitis bacterial spontan 1 0,3

Gastropati HT Porta 29 12,9 Komorbid Efusi pleura 38 12,5 Pneumonia 37 12,2 TB paru 5 1,7 Syok 7 2,3 Sepsis 19 6,3 Penyakit ginjal 10 3,3 Penyakit jantung 3 1 Ensefalopati Hepatikum Tidak ada 233 76,4 Grade I-II 32 10,5 Grade III-IV 40 13,1 Ascites Tidak ada 81 26,6 Ringan-sedang 180 59 Berat 44 14,4 Survival rate Meninggal 60 19,8 Hidup 243 80,2

(41)

Lampiran 4. Tabel Tabulasi Silang Berdasarkan Survival Rate

Variabel

Status

Meninggal Hidup Jumlah

n % n % n % Jenis kelamin Laki-laki 39 65 166 68,3 205 67,7 Perempuan 21 35 77 31,7 98 32,3 Usia < 31 tahun 1 1,7 9 3,7 10 3,3 31 – 40 tahun 3 5 18 7,4 21 6,9 41 – 50 tahun 15 25 64 26,3 79 26,1 51 – 60 tahun 19 31,7 85 35 104 34,3 61 – 70 tahun 15 25 44 18,1 59 19,5 > 70 tahun 7 11,7 23 9,5 30 9,9 Etiologi Virus HBV 35 58,3 149 61,3 184 60,7 HCV 8 13,3 47 19,3 55 18,2 HBV dan HCV 4 50 13 27,7 17 30,9 Non Virus NAFL 3 5 18 7,4 21 6,9 Lain-lain 18 30 41 16,9 59 19,5 Klasifikasi CHILD-PUGH A 0 0 15 8,2 15 6,4 B 4 7,7 71 39 75 32,1 C 48 92,3 96 52,7 144 61,5 Komplikasi

Perdarahan varises esophagus 7 11,7 52 21,4 59 19,5

Ensefalopati hepatikum 41 68,3 25 10,3 66 21,8 Karsinoma hepatoseluler 5 8,3 29 11,9 34 11,2 Sindroma hepatorenal 2 3,3 3 1,2 5 1,7 Hematemesis 17 28,3 62 25,5 79 26,1 Melena 18 30 67 27,6 85 28,1 Ascites 47 78,3 177 72,8 224 73,9

(42)

Peritonitis bakterial spontan 1 1,7 0 0 1 0,3 Gastropati HT Porta 5 8,3 34 14 39 12,9 Komorbid Efusi pleura 3 5 35 14,4 38 12,5 Pneumonia 15 25 22 9,1 37 12,2 TB paru 0 0 5 2,1 5 1,7 Syok 7 11,7 0 0 7 2,3 Sepsis 18 30 1 0,4 19 6,3 Penyakit ginjal 4 6,7 6 2,5 10 3,3 Penyakit jantung 0 0 3 1,2 3 1 Ensefalopati Hepatikum Grade I-II 5 12,5 27 84,4 32 44,4 Grade III-IV 35 87,5 5 15,6 40 55,6 Ascites Ringan-sedang 36 76,6 143 81,3 179 80,3 Berat 11 23,4 33 18,8 44 19,7 Tahun 2010 22 36,7 90 37 112 37 2011 22 36,7 101 41,6 123 40,6 2012 16 26,7 52 21,4 68 22,4

(43)

Tabel uji normalitas kolmogorov smirnov

Variabel

p

Usia

0,193

Bilirubin Total

0,000

Albumin serum

0,246

PPT

0,000

Lama perawatan

0,000

Tabel deskriptif

Variabel

N

Mean

SD

Usia

303

54,17

11,755

Albumin serum

259

2,345

0,6009

Variabel

N

Median

Min.

Max.

Bilirubin Total

245

1,98

0,11

36,31

PPT

226

5,3

-0,9

106,3

Lama perawatan

303

9

0

48

(44)

Klasifikasi CHILD-PUGH

Status

p

Meninggal Hidup Jumlah

n % n % n %

A 0 0 15 8,2 15 6,4 < 0,001

B 4 7,7 71 39 75 32,1

C 48 92,3 96 52,7 144 61,5

Dari uji Chi Square antara Klasifikasi CHILD-PUGH terhadap status survival

didapatkan nilai p = < 0,001, karena p < 0,05 maka dapat disimpulkan terdapat

hubungan yang signifikan antara klasifikasi CHILD-PUGH dengan status survival.

(45)

Tabel sebaran usia berdasarkan survival rate

Usia Survival Rate p Meninggal Hidup n (60) % n (243) % < 31 1 1,7 9 3,7 0,761£ 31 – 40 3 5 18 7,4 41 – 50 15 25 64 26,3 51 – 60 19 31,7 85 35 61 – 70 15 25 44 18,1 > 70 7 11,7 23 9,5

Keterangan :

£

Pearson Chi Square

Tabel Hubungan comorbid terhadap survival rate

Comorbid Survival Rate p Meninggal Hidup n (60) % n (243) % Efusi pleura 3 5 35 14,4 0,049*£ Pneumonia 15 25 22 9,1 0,001*£ TB paru 0 0 5 2,1 0,587¥ Syok 7 11,7 0 0 0,000*¥ Sepsis 18 30 1 0,4 0,000*¥ Penyakit ginjal 4 6,7 6 2,5 0,114¥ Penyakit jantung 0 0 3 1,2 1,000¥

Keterangan :

* Signifikan p < 0,05

£

(46)

¥

Fisher’s Exact Test

Tabel Hubungan komplikasi terhadap survival rate

Komplikasi

Survival Rate

p

Meninggal Hidup

n (60) % n (243) %

Perdarahan varises Esofagus 7 11,7 52 21,4 0,088£

Ensefalopati Hepatikum 41 68,3 25 10,3 0,001*£ Karsinoma Hepatoseluler 5 8,3 29 11,9 0,429£ Sindroma Hepatorenal 2 3,3 3 1,2 0,258¥ Hematemesis 17 28,3 62 25,5 0,656£ Melena 18 30 67 27,6 0,708£ Ascites 47 78,3 177 72,8 0,385£

Peritonitis bacterial spontan 1 1,7 0 0 0,198¥

Gastropati HT Porta 5 8,3 34 14 0,241£

Keterangan :

* Signifikan p < 0,05

£

Pearson Chi Square

¥

(47)
(48)
(49)

Lampiran 7. Dokumentasi Penelitian

(50)

Lampiran 8. Biodata Mahasiswa

Identitas

Nama

: Ni Made Tuty Marselina

NIM

: 22010110110031

Tempat / tanggal lahir

: Denpasar, 23 Maret 1992

Jenis Kelamin

: Perempuan

Alamat

: Jl. Tanah Putih II No.8 RT03 RW02, Semarang

Nomor HP

: 085737105588

E-mail

: tuty.marselina@rocketmail.com

Riwayat Pendidikan Formal

1. SD

: 1998 Lulus tahun : 2004

2. SMP

: 2004 Lulus tahun : 2007

3. SMA

: 2007 Lulus tahun : 2010

Gambar

Tabel Chi Square Klasifikasi CHILD-PUGH terhadap Survival rate
Tabel sebaran usia berdasarkan survival rate  Usia  Survival Rate  p Meninggal Hidup  n (60)  %  n (243)  %  &lt; 31  1  1,7  9  3,7  0,761 £ 31 – 40  3  5  18  7,4  41 – 50  15  25  64  26,3  51 – 60  19  31,7  85  35  61 – 70  15  25  44  18,1  &gt; 70
Tabel Hubungan komplikasi terhadap survival rate

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Dari sepuluh tujuan motivasi tersebut penulis dapat menyimpulkan bahwa apabila karyawan termotivasi maka semangat kerja akan muncul dengan sendirinya, jika semangat telah

Berdasarkan pengertian variabel di atas, maka secara operasional dapat disimpulkan bahwa pengertian “Hubungan Antara Kinerja Kepala Sekolah Sebagai Supervisor Dengan

Dari hasil wawancara yang diproleh hasil kinerja Bagian Umum dan Protokol Kabupaten Tana Tidung khususnya bagian perspektif pembelajaran dan pertumbuhan begitu cukup terarah dan

Area penyimpanan, persiapan, dan aplikasi harus mempunyai ventilasi yang baik , hal ini untuk mencegah pembentukan uap dengan konsentrasi tinggi yang melebihi batas limit

Lingkup Standar Nasional Pendidikan meliputi : (a) Standar isi adalah ruang lingkup materi dan tingkat kompetensi yang dituangkan dalam kriteria tentang kompetensi

Hasil penelitian yang dilakukan di peroleh bahwa terdapat hubungan, yang signifikan antara depresi dengan Activity Daily Living pada lansia di Panti Sosial Tresna

Organisme tanah yang lebih besar dapat memperbaiki struktur tanah dengan cara membuat saluran-saluran (lubang-lubang) di dalam tanah (contohnya lubang cacing), dan

Nama Penyedia barang/Jasa Harga Penawaran Harga Terkoreksi Keterangan. 1 Sumber Rejeki Rp - Rp - Hanya Upload Dok Pengadaan