Introduction To
Introduction To
Linguistics
Linguistics
Week 5
THEORIES
THEORIES
Ferdinand de Saussure
Ferdinand de Saussure
(1857–1913)
Ferdinand de saussure
Ferdinand de saussure
The father of modern linguisticsThe father of modern linguistics
Saussure's most influential work, Saussure's most influential work, Course in Course in
General Linguistics
General Linguistics ( (Cours de linguistique Cours de linguistique
générale
générale), was published posthumously in ), was published posthumously in 1916 by former students Charles Bally and
1916 by former students Charles Bally and
Albert Sechehaye on the basis of notes
Albert Sechehaye on the basis of notes
taken from Saussure's lectures at the
taken from Saussure's lectures at the
University of Geneva.
Langue and parole
Langue and parole
in his book in his book Cours de linguistique Cours de linguistique
generale,
generale, Saussure proposed the terms Saussure proposed the terms langage
langage, , languelangue and and paroleparole..
langage: language in general
langage: language in general
langue
langue : a particular language : a particular language parole
langue
langue
• The system of language, that is the The system of language, that is the
arrangement of sounds and words
arrangement of sounds and words
which speakers of a language have a
which speakers of a language have a
shared language of or ‘agree to use’
shared language of or ‘agree to use’
parole
parole
The actual use of language by people
The actual use of language by people
in speech or writing
Diachronic
Diachronic
vs.
vs.
synchronic
synchronic
view of
view of
linguistics
Diachronic view
Diachronic view
Diachronic linguistics views the historical Diachronic linguistics views the historical
development of a language.
development of a language.
We can go back and forth in time, We can go back and forth in time,
watching the language with all its features
watching the language with all its features
change.
change.
E.g. the change in sound system of English E.g. the change in sound system of English
from old English to modern English
Synchronic view
Synchronic view
Synchronic linguistics views a particular Synchronic linguistics views a particular
state of a language at some given point in
state of a language at some given point in
time.
time.
This could mean This could mean Modern EnglishModern English of the of the
present day, or the systematic analysis of
present day, or the systematic analysis of
the system of Shakespeare's English.
the system of Shakespeare's English.
structuralism
structuralism
Modern linguistics, following Modern linguistics, following Ferdinand de Ferdinand de
Saussure
Saussure, is primarily interested in the , is primarily interested in the synchronicsynchronic point of view.
point of view.
Saussure postulated the priority of synchrony: no Saussure postulated the priority of synchrony: no
knowledge of the historical development of a
knowledge of the historical development of a
language is necessary to examine its present
language is necessary to examine its present
system.
system.
He arrived at this radical viewpoint due to his He arrived at this radical viewpoint due to his
conviction that linguistic research must
conviction that linguistic research must
concentrate on the
Theory of signs (semiotics)
Theory of signs (semiotics)
In linguistics, the sign has ‘two faces’
In linguistics, the sign has ‘two faces’
which cannot be separated
which cannot be separated
• ‘‘signifie’ signifie’ thing meant thing meant
• ‘‘signifiant’ or ‘signifier’ signifiant’ or ‘signifier’ the the
accoustic image
Descriptive vs prescriptive
- how the laNguage shoud be
- how the laNguage shoud be
DescriptiveDescriptive
- acc. To Saussure, linguists’ job is to
- acc. To Saussure, linguists’ job is to
describe, not to prescribe
describe, not to prescribe
Paradigmatic vs. syntagmatic
Paradigmatic vs. syntagmatic
ParadigmaticParadigmatic
any link in chain of speech will any link in chain of speech will
suggest any other language units to
suggest any other language units to
us, because the units either resemble
us, because the units either resemble
or differ from each other in form and
or differ from each other in form and
meaning.
meaning.
Remind us of other words that have Remind us of other words that have ––
ing
ing ending: ending: working, eating, talking, working, eating, talking,
etc
etc
Other compounds of teach: Other compounds of teach: teacher, teacher,
taught, teaches
taught, teaches
Other words with similar meaning Other words with similar meaning
and form:
and form: tutor, mentor, lecturertutor, mentor, lecturer
Words different in both form and Words different in both form and
meaning:
syntagmatic
syntagmatic
Syntagmatic relation holds between
Syntagmatic relation holds between
the successive members of a given
the successive members of a given
Noam Chomsky
Noam Chomsky
in the past received various death in the past received various death
threats because of his criticisms of
threats because of his criticisms of
U.S foreign policy.
U.S foreign policy.
stated that he continues to reside in stated that he continues to reside in
the United States because he
the United States because he
believes it remains the "greatest
believes it remains the "greatest
country in the world,"
Syntactic structures
Syntactic structures
The theory takes utterances (sequences of The theory takes utterances (sequences of
words) to have a syntax which can be
words) to have a syntax which can be
(largely) characterised by a formal
(largely) characterised by a formal
grammar; in particular, a Context-free
grammar; in particular, a Context-free
grammar extended with transformational
grammar extended with transformational
rules.
rules.
A phrase/sentence has its internal A phrase/sentence has its internal
structure
Children are hypothesised to have an Children are hypothesised to have an
innate knowledge of the basic
innate knowledge of the basic
grammatical structure common to all
grammatical structure common to all
human languages (i.e. they assume
human languages (i.e. they assume
that any language which they
that any language which they
encounter is of a certain restricted
encounter is of a certain restricted
kind).
kind).
This innate knowledge is often This innate knowledge is often
referred to as universal grammar.
Generative grammar
Generative grammar
The Chomskyan approach towards syntax The Chomskyan approach towards syntax
is often termed
is often termed generative grammargenerative grammar
Chomskyan syntactic analyses are often Chomskyan syntactic analyses are often
highly abstract, and are based heavily on
highly abstract, and are based heavily on
careful investigation of the border
careful investigation of the border
between grammatical and ungrammatical
between grammatical and ungrammatical
constructs in a language.
constructs in a language.
Such grammatical judgments can only be Such grammatical judgments can only be
made accurately by a native speaker,