92 A. Kesimpulan
Berdasarkan uraian pada bab-bab sebelumnya, dapat ditarik kesimpulan seperti berikut. 1. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan computer anxiety (anticipation dan fear) secara parsial
berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keahlian penggunaan komputer dalam penulisan skripsi mahasiswa. Hal itu ditunjukkan nilai rx1y sebesar 0,291. Nilai koefisien determinasi r2x1y atau besarnya sumbangan pengaruh X1 terhadap Y adalah 0,084 dan thitung sebesar 2,025 lebih besar dari ttabel sebesar 0,198.
2. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan computer attitude (optimism, pessimism, dan intimidation) secara parsial berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keahlian penggunaan komputer dalam penulisan skripsi mahasiswa. Hal itu ditunjukkan nilai rx2y sebesar 0,396. Nilai koefisien determinasi r2x2y atau besarnya sumbangan pengaruh X2 terhadap Y adalah 0,149 dan thitung sebesar 3,098 lebih besar dari ttabel sebesar 0,198.
3. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan computer anxiety (anticipation dan fear) dan computer attitude (optimism, pessimism, dan intimidation) secara simultan berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keahlian penggunaan komputer dalam penulisan skripsi mahasiswa. Hal ini ditunjukkan nilai Ry(1,2) sebesar 0,343 lebih besar dari rtabel sebesar 0,198. Nilai koefisien determinasi (Adjusted R2) sebesar 0,101. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan uji F diperoleh nilai Fhitung sebesar 7,123.
B. Implikasi Penelitian
Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa kecemasan berkomputer dan sikap berkomputer berpengaruh signifikan terhadap keahlian penggunaan komputer. Sehubungan dengan itu, antisipasi dan sikap optimism dalam berkomputer perlu dipertahankan karena dua hal tersebut dapat meningkatkan keahlian penggunaan komputer. Sementara itu, rasa takut, sikap pessimism dan intimidation harus dikurangi karena dapat menghambat keahlian penggunaan komputer mahasiswa.
C. Rekomendasi
Berdasarkan kesimpulan dari hasil penelitian tersebut dapat diajukan saran-saran seperti berikut.
93
1. Untuk Mahasiswa Program Studi Akuntansi
Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa keahlian penggunaan computer mahasiswa termasuk dalam kategori sedang. Sehubungan dengan itu, mahasiswa perlu meningkatkan keahlian penggunaan komputer dengan cara Mahasiswa perlu meningkatkan keahlian penggunaan berkomputer dengan sesuai dengan program yang digunakan, dan mengikuti kursus atau pelatihan sehingga rasa takut semakin berkurang.
2. Untuk Penelitian Selanjutnya
Disarankan kepada peneliti selanjutnya untuk meneliti computer anxiety dan computer attitude dengan cara melakukan pengujian berdasarkan dimensi-dimensinya yakni: fear, anticipation, optimism, pessimism, dan intimidation sehingga dapat diketahui dengan jelas dari dimensi tersebut yang berpengaruh positif dan berpengaruh negatif terhadap keahlian penggunaan komputer.
94
Agarwal, Rithu, V. Sambamurthy and R.M. Stair. (2000). Reserach Report: The Solving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self Efficacy - An Empirical Assessment”, Information
Systems Research, Vol.11, No. 4.
Ajzen, I dan Madden (2005). Prediction of Goal-Directed Behavior: Attitudes, Intentions, and Perceived Behavioral control, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 22, pp. 453-474.
Ali, Syaiful, dan Fadila. (2008). Kecemasan Berkomputer (Computer
Anxiety) dan Karakteristik Tipe Kepribadian pada Mahasiswa
Akuntansi Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta. Simposium
Nasional Akuntansi ke‐11 Pontianak.
Anderson, Α. (1996). Predictors of computer anxiety and performance in information systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(1), 61-77.
Assael, Henry (1998), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action. 6th Ed. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
Ayersman, D. J. (1996). Effects of Computer Instruction, Learning Style, Gender, and Experience on Computer Anxiety. Computers in the
Schools, 12 (4), 15-30.
Azwar, S. (2003). Sikap Manusia: Teori dan Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.
Bandura, A. (2006). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman. Batu, C., Arunachalam, N., dan Chandler Smith, B. (1996). A Review of the Construct of
Computer Experience. Computers in Human Behaviour, 15, 227-242.
Bowers, D.A.J. and Bowers, V.M. (1996). Assessing and Coping with Computer Anxiety in the Social Science Class-room. Social Science Review (14:4), pp. 439-443. Bradley, G. and Russell, G. (1997). "Computer Experience, School Support, and Computer
Anxiety," Educational Psychology (17:3), pp. 25-28.
Broome, T., & Havelka, J. 2009. Determinants Of Computer Anxiety In Business Students. The Review of Business Information Systems Volume 6, Number 2.
Brosnan, M.J. 1999. “The Impact of Computer Anxiety and Self-efficacy Upon Performance”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14, 1998, pp. 223-234.
Burkett, W.H., Compton, D.M. and Burkett, G.G. (2001). "An Examination of Computer Attitudes, Anxieties, and Aversions Among Diverse College Populations: Issues Central to Understanding Information Sciences in the New Millennium," Informing Science (4:3), pp. 77-85.
95
Chau, S. L., Chen, D. T., & Wong, F. L. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates:A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior,15, 609-623
Chau, P. Y. K., dan Hu, P. J. (2002). ’Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physical Acceptance of TelemedicineTechnology’, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 16,No. 2, pp. 91-112.
Cherrington, D.J. (1994). Organizational Behaviour. Second Edition. Allyn & Bacon.
Comer, F. G., & Geissler, C. (1998). A Methodology for Software
Evaluation. Proceedings of SITE 98, Washington, DC.
Compeau, Deborah R. and C.A. Higgins (1995). Computer Self Efficacy: Development of Measure and Initial Test, MIS Quartely, Vol.19, No.12.
Dhandung. (2004). Pengaruh Computer Anxiety Terhadap Keahlian
Akuntan Pendidik Dalam Menggunakan Komputer. Skripsi. (Tidak
Dipublikasikan). Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
Doyle, E. (2005). Computer Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, Computer Experience: An investigation throughout a Computer Science degree.
ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 19 – 22,
2005.
Elasmar, T, Charter, H. (1996). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS
Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
Emmons, B. A. (2003). Computer Anxiety, Communication Preferences, and
Personality Type in the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State
University.
First, Break All the Rules; Marcus Buckingham & Curt Coffman; The Gallup Organization, 1999
Fishman, B.J. 1999. Characteristics of Students Related to Computer-mediated Communications Activity. Journal of Research on
Computing in Education, 32(1), 73-77.
Francis, J.J., Eccles, M.P., Johnston, M., Walker, A., Grimshaw, J., Foy, R., Kaner, E.F.S., Smith, L., dan Bonetti, D. (2004). Constructing
Qustionnaires Based on The Theory of Planned Behaviour. A Manual for Health Services Researches. United Kingdom: Quality
Ghozali, Imam. (2002). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program
SPSS, Edisi Kedua. Semarang: BP-Undip.
---. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan Program IBM
SPSS 19. Semarang: Badang Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Harrison, A., & Rainer, K. (1992). An Examination of the Factor Structures and Concurrent Validities for the Computer Attitude Scale, the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale, and the Computer Self-efficacy Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 501-505.
Hao, Yang. (2006). Understanding Computer Anxiety and Computer Related
Experience: The Model and Practices. State University of New York
at Oswego
Herdman, S. J. (2003). Discretionary Use of Computers: An Empirically Derived Explanatory Model. Decision Sciences, 22, 241-265.
---. (2004). Student teachers, computer anxiety, and computer experience. Journal of Educational Computing Research,
11(1), 27-50.
Horvat, J., Petric, G., & Mikrut, M. (2006). Measuring Computer and Web Attitudes Using Cas and Was Measurement Instruments, MIS
Quarterly, 23, 2, pp. 239–260
Igbaria, M., & Parasuraman, S. (1989). A Path Analytic Study of Individual Characteristics, Computer Anxiety, and Attitudes Towards Microcomputers. Journal of Manage 373-388.
Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S., & Baroudi, J. J. (1996). A motivational model of microcomputer usage. Journal of Management
Information Systems, 13(1), 127-143.
Indriantoro, Nur. (2000). Pengaruh Komputer Anxiety terhadap Keahlian Dosen dalam Pengunaan Komputer”, Jurnal Akuntansi dan
Auditing Indonesia. Vol.4, No.2.
Indriantono, Nur, dan Supomo, Bambang. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian
Bisnis Untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE
Yogyakarta
Jay, T.B. (2001) Computerphobia: What to do about it. Educational
97
Kaplan, Harold I, Sadock, Benjamin J, & Grebb, Jack. A. (1997). Sinopsis Psikiatri. Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara.
Kountur, Ronny. (2004). Metode Penelitian untuk Penulisan Skripsi dan
Tesis, Jakarta: Penerbit PPM.
Landry, Jr., R.M., Rogers, R.L., & Harrell, H.W. (1996). Computer Usage and Psychological Type Characteristics in Accounting Students.
Journal of Accounting and Computers (Spring), 12.
Loyd, B., & Gressard, C. (1984). Reliability and Factorial Validity of
Computer Attitude Scales. Educational and Psychological
Measurement, 44, 501-505.
Marakas, G., Yi, M., & Johnson, R. 1998. The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Research.
Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126-163.
Mangkunegara, A.A. Anwar Prabu. 2002. Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya
Manusia. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Mahar, D., Henderson, R., & Deane, F. (1997). The Effects of Computer Anxiety, State Anxiety, and Computer Experience on Users' Performance of Computerbased Tasks. Personality and Individual
Differences, 22(5), 683-692.
Maurer, M.M. (1994). Computer Anxiety Correlates and What They Tell Us: a
literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, (10)3, 369-376. Murphy, C.A., Coover, D. & Owen, S.V. (1989). Development and
Validation of the Computer Self-efficacy Scale. Educational and
Psychological Measurement, 49, 893-899.
Oetting, E. R. (1983). Oetting's computer anxiety scale (COMPAS). Ft. Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Behavioral Science Institute.
Orr. (2000). Barriers to the Treatment of Social Anxiety. Journal of
Psychiatry, 1(57), 521-527.
Panagiotakopoulos, C., & Koustourakis, G. (2001). Dealing With 1
st
Year University Students “Computer Anxiety”. Themes in Education, 2, 1, 35-46.
Potosky, D., and Bobko, P. (1998). “The computer understanding and experiences scale: a self-report measure of computer experience”,
Computers in Human Behavior, 14(2), 1998, pp. 337-348.
Rifa, D., & Gudono. (1999). Pengaruh Faktor Demografi dan Personality terhadap keahlian dalam End User Computing. Jurnal Riset
Akuntansi Indonesia, 2(1), 20-36
Rosen, L.D., & Weil, M.M. (2010). Computers, Classroom Instruction, and the Computerphobic University Student. Collegiate Microcomputer, 8(4), 275-283.
Rustiana. (2004). Computer Self Efficacy (CSE) Mahasiswa Akuntansi Jurusan Ekonomi Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi - Universitas Kristen Petra http://puslit.petra.ac.id/journals/accounting
Saade, R.G., Kira, D. (2009). Computer Anxiety in E-Learning: The Effect of Computer Efficacy. Journal of Inoformation Technology
Education, Vol. 8.
Santoso, Singgih. (2006). SPSS Versi 18. Mengolah Data Statistik Secara
Profesional. Jakarta. PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1992). Social anxiety and Self-presentation: A Conceptualization and Model. Psychological
Bulletin, 92, 641–669.
Sekaran, Uma. (2003). Research Methods for Business. Fourth Edition. New York: John Milley and Sons, Inc.
Setyawati, Dyah Ratna. (2007). Pengaruh Faktor Computer Anxiety,
Computer Attitude, dan Math Anxiety terhadap Keahlian dalam End User Computing (Survei pada Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan
Akuntansi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta angkatan 2004 dan angkatan 2004). Skripsi (Tidak diterbitkan). Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Singarimbun, Masri & Effendi, Sofyan. (2004). Metode Penelitian Survei. Jakarta: LP3ES
Stuart & Sundeen (1998). Buku Saku Keperawatan Jiwa, Edisi 3, Alih Bahasa Achir Yani, S. Hamid, Jakarta : EGC.
Sugiyono. (2006). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta. Surachmad, Winarno. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung:
99
Sweeney, B. dan Costell, F. (2009). “Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-Making : An Empirical Examination of Undergraduate Accounting and Business Students.” Accounting Education : An International
Journal, Vol. 18, No. I, 75-97, Februari 2009.
Teguh, J. (2008). Pengaruh Computer Anxiety, Gender, dan Kurikulum Perguruan Tinggi Negeri terhadap Keahlian Penggunaan
Komputer. Skripsi (Versi Elektronik). Fakultas Ekonomi
Universitas Brawijaya Malang.
Towell, E.R. and Lauer, J. (2001). "Personality Differences and Computer Related Stress in Business Students," Mid-American Journal of
Business (16:1), pp. 69-75.
Ursavas, O.F., & Karal, H. (2009). Assessing Pre-Service Teachers’
Computer Phobia Levels in terms of Gender and Experience, Turkish Sample. International Journal of Human and Social
Sciences 4:9
Venkatesh, V., Davis, E. (1996). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model, Information Systems Research. Vo.11, No.4.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., and Ackerman, P.L. (2000). A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision Making Processes. Organizational Behavior and
Human Decision Processes, 83, 33-60.
Wayne, D.H., & Macinnis, D.J. (2010). Consumer Behavior. Fifth Edition. NY: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Woszczynski, A.B., Lazar, L.D., & Walker, J.M. (2010). Does Training
Reduce Computer Anxiety?
Wibowo, Tri, & Pancawati Hardiningsih. (2008). Pengaruh Faktor Personality dan Professional Commitment Terhadap Keahlian Audit. Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi. Vol. 12.
Yang, Hall, V.G. (1996). Making Decisions about Software for Classroom Use. Reading Research and Instruction, 38(3), 187-96.
