• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

T1 112012117 Full text

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "T1 112012117 Full text"

Copied!
39
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY

SOPHOMORESIN PUBLIC RELATIONS DEPARTMENT

THESIS

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment

of the Requirements for the Degree ofSarjana Pendidikan

Octavian Graceas

112012117

ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION PROGRAM

FACULTY OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS

UNIVERSITAS KRISTEN SATYA WACANA

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)

i

Vocabulary Learning Strategies

Used by Sophomores in Public Relations Department

THESIS

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment

of the Requirements for the Degree of

Sarjana Pendidikan

Octavian Graceas

112012117

Approved by

Gita Hastuti,S.Pd., M.A. Vica Ananta Kusuma,S.Pd., M.A.

(6)

ii

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This thesis contains no such material as has been submitted for examination in any course or

accepted for the fulfillment of any degree or diploma in any university. To the best of my

knowledge and my belief, this contains no material previously published or written by any

other person except where due reference is made in the text.

Copyright@ 2016. Octavian Graceas and Gita Hastuti,S.Pd., M.A.

All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced by any means without the

permission of at least one of the copyright owners or the English Language Education

Program, Faculty of Language and Arts, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, Salatiga.

(7)

iii

PUBLICATION AGREEMENT DECLARATION

As a member of the Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana academic community, I verify that: Name : Octavian Graceas

Student ID Number : 112012117

Study Program : English Language Education Faculty : Faculty of Language and Arts Kind of Work : Undergraduate Thesis

In developing my knowledge, I agree to provide UKSW with a non-exclusive royalty free right for my intellectual property and the contents therein entitled:

Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by Sophomores in Public Relations Department With this non-exclusive royalty free right, UKSW maintains the right to copy, reproduce, print, publish, post, display, incorporate, store in or scan into a retrieval system or database, transmit, broadcast, barter or sell my intellectual property, in whole or in part without my express written permission, as long as my name is still included as the writer.

This declaration is made according to the best of my knowledge.

Made in : Salatiga Date :

Verified by signee

Octavian Graceas

Approved by

Thesis Supervisor Thesis Examiner

(8)

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Approval Page ... i

Copyright Statement ... ii

Publication Agreement Declaration ... iii

Table of Contents ... iv

List of Table ... vi

List of Figures ... vi

Abstract ... 1

Introduction ... 1

Literature Review... 3

Vocabulary Learning Strategies... 3

Types of Vocabulary Learning Strategies ... 4

Related Previous Studies ... 6

The Study ... 7

Methodology ... 7

Context of the Study ... 7

Participants... 8

(9)

v

Data Collection Procedure ... 10

Data Analysis Procedure ... 10

Discussion ... 10

Metacognitive Stategies ... 12

Cognitive Strategies ... 13

Social Strategies ... 15

Affective Strategies... 16

Compensation Strategies... 28

Memory Strategies ... 19

Conclusion ... 21

Acknowledgements ... 23

References ... 24

(10)

vi

LIST OF FIGURE

Figure 1 Overall Strategies of Vocabulary Learning ... 10

LIST OF TABLE Table 1. SILL’s Key... 11

Table 2 Metacognitive Strategies... 12

Table3Cognitive Strategies ... 14

Table 4 Social Strategies ... 17

Table 5 Affective Strategies ... 19

Table 6 Compensation Strategies ... 21

(11)

1

Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by Sophomores

of Public Relations Department

Octavian Graceas

Abstract

Vocabulary is an essential aspect for L2 students. It will be difficult for students who have lack of vocabulary to learn L2. Therefore, we need to know which strategies used by the students to help them learn vocabulary. The purpose of this study is to investigate the strategies used by sophomore taking BIP1 class of Public Relations Department in Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana. The participants of this study are 18 sophomore who take BIP 1 class in Public Relations Department. The data was analyzed based on Oxford’s (1990) taxonomy, which are memory strategies, cognitive strategies, metacognitive strategies, social strategies, affective strategies, and compensation strategies. The results of this study showed that metacognitive strategies were the most frequently used and memory strategies were used the least by the participants.

Key Words:Vocabulary learning strategies, Public Relations

INTRODUCTION

Vocabulary is an important element for L2 learners ( Saengpakdeejit, 2014; Lip,

2009; Hadavi and Hashemi, 2014). L2 learners with inadequate vocabulary can not

understand what people say, and they can not utter their ideas well because of the lack of

vocabulary. Words are the building blocks of a language since they contain objects, actions,

and ideas (Lotfi, 2007). L2 learners,especially those who learn English for Specific Purposes

(ESP), need to know and understand the target language vocabulary. Harding (2011, as cited

in Desiana, 2014) stated that vocabulary is crucial in ESP because learners will meet many

technical or specialized words which are used to explain ESP materials in their specialism

(p.53). Therefore, vocabulary leaning strategies are really important for L2 learners.

According to Lotfi ( 2007 ), vocabulary learning strategies (VLS) encourages greater overall

(12)

2

students who could use vocabulary learning strategy to learn vocabulary will be able to take

responsibility and take control of their own learning process.

Some researchers have studied about vocabulary learning strategies. In his study, Lip

(2009) reported the vocabulary learning strategies that were most frequently used by

postsecondary students in Hong Kong. The result of his study were as follows: 1) spelling the

word in the mind repeatedly; 2) analyzing the word by breaking down the sound segments; 3)

remembering words by doing a project; and 4) asking classmates for the meaning of the

word. A similar research study was done by Noorizah and Zaini (2009) with 35 post-graduate

students doing the programme at the School of Language Studies and Linguistics, Faculty of

Social Sciences and Humanities at University Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM). They found that

memorization strategies were the most frequently used strategy and note taking strategies

werethe least frequently usedstrategy.

This study focuses on the strategies used by the Public Relations students in learning

vocabulary. The question of the study is “What VLS are used by the Sophomores of Public

Relations Department to develop their vocabulary?” The purpose of this research is to

describe the strategies used by sophomores who were taking BIP1 of the Public Relations

Department in Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

The present study has some significance for students and teachers. The results of the

study may help students tobe aware of the strategies that they have or have not usedto

learnvocabularyand to reflect on which strategies might fit them best, so that they could

decide what to do next to improve their vocabulary. Additionally, the study provides

information for the teacher to implement suitable techniques to help increase students’

vocabulary. The study also provides significance for ELE students. The study may help the

ELE students to conduct further study on the same topic. Also, ELE student may use the

(13)

3

LITERATURE REVIEW

Vocabulary Learning Strategies (VLS)

Vocabulary is an important factor for L2 students (Saengpakdeejit, 2014; Amirian &

Heshamatifar, 2013; Hadavi & Hashemi, 2014). According to Bonsa & Wolde (2014)

students who use VLS successfully could improve their vocabulary knowledge because the

students become independent learners who take responsibility for their own language

learning. Also, Saengpakdeejit (2014) stated that students can significantly improve their

language competence by developing their vocabulary learning strategies. Hence, vocabulary

learning strategies are a crucial part in English language learning as Wilkins (1972, as cited in

Khalifa, 2015) stated, “Without grammar very little can be conveyed, without vocabulary

nothing can be conveyed”.

According to Amiri & Heshmatifar (2013), learning vocabulary is considered as a

necessary part of language learning.Limited knowledge of vocabulary results in learner’s

difficulties in comprehension as well as production of language. Therefore, the strategies

which students use must help the students build their vocabulary. Accoding to Oxford (1994,

as cited in Hadavi & Hashemi, 2014), vocabulary learning strategies are specific actions,

behaviors, steps, or techniques students use, often consciously, to improve their progress in

apprehending, internalizing, and using the L2. Hence, using some vocabulary learning

strategies will help the students to develop their vocabulary.

Catalan (2003, as cited in Saengpakdeejit,2014) has seen VLS as the mechanism

(process, strategies) used to learn vocabulary as well as steps or actions taken by students (a)

to find out the meaning of unknown words, (b) to retain them in long-term memory, (c) to

recall them at will, and (d) to use them in oral or written mode. Therefore, using appropriate

(14)

4 Types of Vocabulary Learning Strategies

Each researcher has different taxonomies of vocabulary learning strategies. Some of

them tried to divide the strategies into some aspects. The first taxonomy is Oxford’s

taxonomy (1990). There are six strategies in Oxford’s taxonomy, including memory

strategies, cognitive strategies, compensation strategies, metacognitive strategies, affective

strategies, and social strategies which are grouped into two major types: direct and indirect

strategies.

Direct strategies refer to “strategies involving mental process and directly influencing

the target language” (Oxford,1990 as cited in Chi &Tam, 2013, p.6). The direct strategies

consist of memory strategies, cognitive strategies, and compensation strategies. Memory

strategies are used by language students for remembering and retrieving new information,

such as rhyming new vocabulary. Cognitive strategies enable the students to understand and

produce new language, such as practicing new vocabulary. Compensation strategies help the

learners in overcoming lack of knowledge and continuing to communicate authentically, such

as guessing meaning from contexts (Kovanen,2014).

Meanwhile, “indirect strategies are those supporting and managing language without

directly involving the target language” (Oxford, 1990 as cited in Chi & Tam, 2013,p.7). In

other words, indirect strategies give indirect support for language learning through focusing,

planning, evaluating, seeking opportunities, controlling anxiety, increasing cooperation and

empathy and other means (Ellis,1994 as cited in Tam, 2013). Included in this strategies are

Metacognitive Strategies, Affective Strategies, and Social Strategies. Metacognitive strategies

are students’ actions in coordinating their own learning process, like focusing, arranging and

evaluating their learning. Affective strategies are techniques like self-reinforcement and

(15)

5

motivations related to vocabulary learning. The last but not least is social strategies that

engage students in learning new vocabulary with others such as asking the meaning of words

from their classmate and checking the correctness of what they know from their teacher

(Oxford, 1990, as cited in Khalifa, 2015).

In addition, Schmitt (2000) also classified vocabulary learning strategies into five

specific groups, namely determination strategies, social strategies, memory strategies,

cognitive strategies, and metacognitive strategies (pp. 134-136). First, in determination

strategies students try to become autonomous learners. For instance, the students try to

understand the vocabulary without any help fromotherpeople. Second, social strategies

engage students peer to learn new vocabulary. Next strategies are memory strategies. In this

type of strategies the students try to recall vocabulary that they have already known. For

example, they will relate their previous knowledge by grouping the vocabulary by its form or

topic using physical action, etc. The fourth is cognitive strategies. The strategies do not use

mental processing but engage students in mechanical processes, such as repeating the

pronunciation of new words. The last is metacognitive strategies which are consist of

processes involved in monitoring, decision-making, and evaluation of one’s progress.

These two taxonomies are similar in that they have social strategies, memory

strategies, cognitive strategies, and metacognitive strategies. However, compensation

strategies and affective strategies appeared only in Oxford’s (1990) taxonomy and

determination strategies appeared only in Schmitt’s taxonomy (2000). With regard to this,

Hastuti (2014) has believed Oxford (1990) taxonomy provides clear-cut categories of

vocabulary learning strategies. Therefore, agreeing with Hastuti (2014), the researcher

(16)

6 Related Previous Studies

Some VLS research studies used Oxford’s taxonomy to find the result of their study.

One of the studies was conducted by Khalifa (2015). The study focused on VLS used by

secondary school students in a Libyan school. The subject in this study was 180 students who

had been studying English language for 6 years. The result of this study confirmed that

memory strategies are most frequently used by students in the Libyan school.

Another study was conducted by Hastuti (2014) in STAIN Pekalongan. The study

discussed about exploring STAIN Pekalongan students strategies in learning English

language. The aim of this study was to know what strategies were mostly used and how the

students learn the English language. The result of this study was the students used all

strategies in Oxford’s taxonomy and the strategy frequently used by students was cognitive

strategies and the strategy that was least frequently used by the students was memory

strategies.

The next study was conducted by Dahana (2013). The study investigated the use of

strategies by elementary school students in learning vocabulary. The participants of this study

were 96 students from the fourth, fifth, and sixth grade from Sekolah Dasar Negeri 10

Salatiga. The result of this study found the strategy frequently used by the students was

metacognitive strategies and the least strategies used by the students was determination

strategies.

Another study that used Oxford’s taxonomy as the data collection instrument was

conducted by Nosidlak (2013). The study aimed to identify which VLS were used by English

philology students at the Pedagogical University of Cracow, Poland. The results of this study

found the strategy frequently used by the students was memory strategies, similar to the

(17)

7

THE STUDY

Methodology

The aim of the study is to identify the vocabulary learning strategies frequently used

by sophomores Public Relations Department who take BIP1 class in Universitas Kristen

Satya Wacana. In this study the researcher combined the quantitative and qualitative

methods. Hirsjärvi et al. (2005 as cited in Marttinen, 2008) stated qualitative study includes a

comprehansive acquisition and the data is collected in natural and real environment. This

study collected the data in BIP1 class in natural and real environment. The researcher will

describe the data based on participants response. Quantitive methods were used in order to

provide and count the data. A likert-scale questionnaire was used to gain the general

information regarding the use of vocabulary learning strategies, and interviews were

employed to support the general information with more specific details.

Context of the study

This study was conducted in Bahasa Inggris Pengantar 1 (BIP1) class in Public

Relations Department, Univeritas Kristen Satya Wacana. Bahasa Inggris Profesi 1 (BIP1) is

a required course in the Public Relations Departement in Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

The PR students should take BIP 1as aprerequisite courseto the next required course, BIP2

and BIP3. The students should take BIP 1. In BIP 1, students learn about general English and

some vocabulary related to Public Relations terms. After they pass BIP 1, they can take BIP

2.

Participants

The participants of this study were the second year students of the Public Relations

(18)

8

2015-2016 when the data were gathered. The participants of this study were 18 students from

the Public Relations Department in Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana. They took BIP 1

course which provided them with English for the introduction of public relations. The

Indonesian language was known as the native language of all students. BIP 1 used Indonesian

language as the language of instruction in this course.

Data Collection Instruments

The study will use questionnaire and interview as the research instruments. In the

study, a 4 likert-scale questionnare was used to collect the data. The 4 likert-scale

questionnaire consisted of twenty-five statements of vocabulary learning strategies. They

include the following: five statements on memory Strategies, five statements on cognitive

strategies (COG), four statements on compensation strategies, six statements on

metacognitive strategies, three statements on affective strategies, and two on social strategies.

The questionnaire was adapted from Oxford’s taxonomy (1990). Oxford’s original taxonomy

questionnaire has 50 questions, but in this study the researcher modified the questionnaire by

reducing the number of the items into twenty-five statements to adjust with the participants’

level and the item deleted was based on the consideration of the BIP1 teacher. The researcher

chose the statements based on the possibile strategies that were frequently used by students to

learn vocabulary. Oxford’s original taxonomy use 5-point likert scale but in this study the

resercher used 4-point likert scale. The researcher excluded the “undecided” scale and

changed the likert-scale into 4-likert scale because the researcher expected the exact answer

like agree or disagree, not undicided. The participants should select an option: 4 (Strongly

Agree), 3 (Agree), 2 (Disagree), or 1 (Strongly Disagree) to respond to the given statements.

The researcher also conducted semi-structured interviews with six participants to

(19)

9

representatives from different strategies that they had chosen in the questionnaire section.

Some possible questions for the the participants include:

1. In number two you choose strongly agree with this statement ,“I connect the sound of

a new English word and an image or picture of the word to help me remember the

word”. Why did you choose this strategy to help you learn new vocabulary?

2. How do you do the strategy? Give examples, please.

3. Does the strategy really help you to learn new vocabulary?

4. What is the benefit of using this strategy?

The interview questions were derived from the respondents’ answers in the questionaire

section and the researcher used the participants’ native language, Indonesian, to interview the

participants to make the participants feel free and comfortable to answer the questions. The

researcher chose six participants to be interviewed based on the criterion sampling.

According to Blackledge (2001, as cited in Zacharias, 2012), criterion sampling technique

could be done by setting up some criteria and finding the participants who meet those

expected criteria. Six participants in the context of the study were selected because they

frequently used the respective strategies.

Data Collection Procedure

The questionnaire was distributed at the end of the class. First, the researcher

explained the instruction. Next, the researcher distributed the questionnaire to the 18 students

in BIP1 class. The time given was approximately 15-20 minutes for the participants. Then,

based on the scoring system, the total point of each item in each category was counted and

divided by the number of the students to get the mean of each item. Next, to get the mean of

each category, the mean of each item was counted and divided by the number of item in

(20)

10

researcher conducted semi-structured interviews with six of the students. The six students

were selected based on criterion sampling to represent different strategies that they have

chosen. All subjects were made anonymous and were labeled A to F in the study.

Data Analysis Procedure

After completing the stage of data collection, the researcher analyzed the data using

Excel. The mean of the data was analyzed to answer the research question in this study

“What VLS are used by the sophomores of Public Relations Department to develop their

vocabulary?”. To get the mean of each strategy, the data was calculated based on scoring

system. Second, when the data have been obtained, the personal interview was conducted by

the researcher to dig deeper information regarding the respective strategies.

DISCUSSION

In this section, the results of data analysis are presented and discussed as an effort to

answer the proposed research question. The discussion of this section is based on the six

strategies by Oxford’s taxonomy (1990) which have been mentioned ealier, including

Memory Strategies, Cognitive Strategies, Compensation Strategies, Metacognitive Strategies,

Affective strategies, and Social strategies. Table 1 below summarizes the meaning of the

scales in Oxford’s (1990) taxonomy, which is called SILL’s Key. This key is used to

interpret the participants’ responses to the likert-scale questionnaire.

Table 1. SILL’s Key Average (Mean) Frequency

1.0 – 1.4 Never or Almost Never Used

(21)

11

2.5 – 3.4 Sometimes Used

3.5 – 4.4 Usually Used

4.5 – 5.0 Always or Almost Always Used

Figure 1 summarizes the strategies used in the class of BIP 1. The deeper discussions

on those findings will be elaborated afterwards.

FIGURE 1

Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used

Figure 1 shows that the metacognitive strategies (M=3.66) were the most frequently

used by the students. The second strategy most frequently used by students in learning

vocabulary were cognitive strategy (M=3.55). The third and forth strategies used by the

students were social strategies and affective strategies. Both strategies have the same mean

(M=3.33). It is followed by compensation strategies (M=3.05), and finally, the least

frequently used strategies were memory strategies(M=2.83).

This finding is similar to Dahana’s finding in his study in 2010, in which the most

frequently used strategy was metacognitive strategies. However, it is not in line with Khalifa

(2015) and Nosidlak (2013) who found that memory strategies were the most frequently used

2.83

3.55 3.05

3.66 3.33 3.33

(22)

12

by their participants. In addition, the finding is different from Hastuti’s study (2014), which

found cognitive strategies as the most frequently used strategies, but it is similar in that

memory strategies were the strategies that were least frequently used.

Next, the researcher is going to describe the average of each strategy starting from the

highest to the lowest one and the highest and lowest item of each strategy.

Metacognitive Strategies

Table 2 below presents the use of metacognitive strategies by the participants.

Table 2. Metacognitivie Strategies

No Strategies 1 2 3 4 Total Mean

Q15 I plan my schedule so I will have

enough time to study English.

1

Q20 I notice my English mistakes and

(23)

13

Table 2 provides statements within the category of metacognitive strategies. From the

six strategies used by the students, the highest item isquestion 18 (Q18) “I pay attention when

someone is speaking English” (M=3.66). According to Table 1 (SILL’s Key) the mean

indicates that the participants usually used this strategy while learning vocabulary, i.e. they

usually paid attention when someone was speaking English. Student D as the representative

of this strategy said the strategy made her easy to learn new vocabulary because she was

happy when she saw someone speaking using English and she gave her attention to listen to

and watch the speaker.

“I’m happy when I see someone speaking in English, when she talks, I usually pay attention to her and I can learn how she pronounces the words”

From the data above we can see if the student used metacognitive strategy to learn

new vocabulary through listening and watching someone who speaks English, she does not

only learn new vocabulary but also learn how to pronounce it.

The lowest item of this strategy is question 15 (Q15) “I plan my schedule so I will

have enough time to study English” (M=2.50). Regarding this statement, Student D further

said that she did not have enough time to plan the schedule to learn new vocabulary because

of her activities outside the campus.

“I never plan my schedule when to learn English. I learn English when there is a class and if I will have vocabulary test on the next day. I have many activities outside the campus and the activity makes me hard to study.”

Although Question 15 (Q15) has the lowest mean among the other metacognitive

strategies, the mean indicates that the participants sometimes used this strategy.

Cognitive Strategies

Table 3 below indicates the use of cognitive stategies by the students of Public

(24)

14

Q8 I start conversations in English. 0

0%

Q10 I watch English language TV shows

spoken in English or go to movies

The cognitive strategies were in the second place after metacognitive strategies.

According to Lip (2009) cognitive strategies help students to learn English vocabulary with

mechanical process. In the strategy students try to talk like native speaker, read, and write to

learn English vocabulary.

It can be seen in Table 3 that the item with the highest mean is Question 10 (Q10) “I

watch English language TV shows spoken in English or go to movies spoken in English”

(M=3.55).The mean indicates that the students usually learned new vocabulary from

watching TV shows or movies spoken in English.

Student B as repesentative of this study said

I like to watch western movies that used English, but when I watch the movie or drama in English, I usually used Indonesian subtitle or English subtitle to help me understand the

(25)

15

Thus, we can see if some of the participants like to watchEnglish movies but they still

need subtitle to help them understand the movies better. Probably, the student still has the

lack of vocabulary, so she still needs subtitle to help them in learning vocabulary through

watching movies. They learn vocabulary outside the class using movie as the learning

material and when I asked student B about the benefit of this strategy, student B explained

that he could learn more vocabulary and how to pronounce the words. He also added that she

could learn the cultures of the target language.

“I learn a lot of vocabulary, then I can understand, “ooo this is how we pronounce it.” In the

video we not only learn about vocabulary but also we can learn about the cultures too.”

From her explanation above we can see that the strategies have a lot of benefit in

learning English. The strategies help the student to learn not only the vocabulary but also the

pronounciation and the cultures of the target language.

The lowest item in this strategy is Question 9 (Q9),“I read for pleasure in English”

(M= 2.50). Student B as the representative of this study said if she did not have enough time

to read English book whether for academic purposes and non academic purposes.

“I rarely read English book because sometimes, I don’t have time to read it. I usually read the

book, especially PR course books if I have BIP 1 class in the following day.”

From the data above we can see that the student did not have enough time to read the

book, and the student preferred watching English movies to reading English books to gain the

new vocabulary.

Social Stretegies

Table 4 below shows the use of social strategies by the participants in learning

vocabulary.

Table 4. Social Strategies

(26)

16

strategies to learn new vocabulary. The highest item in this strategy is Question 25 (Q25) “I

practice English with other students.” Student F, as the representative of this study said that

she used this strategy with her brother, sister, and her friends in BIP 1 class.

“Sometimes I speak English with my classmates, but we are just joking and sometimes

for discussing about PR course. Sometimes I talk to my sister or brother using English. But, the context of our conversation are just a joke and from our conversation, I can

sometimes learn new vocabulary.”

The lowest item in the strategy is Question 24 (Q24) “I ask question in English”

(M=3.05). The mean indicates the strategy was sometimes used by the participant while

learning vocabulary. The student had eagerness to ask any question in English to the teacher,

but the student felt afraid of making a mistake in the pronunciation and the grammar. So, the

student just asked the question to her friends.

“I want to practice my ability in speaking English with my teacher, but I’m afraid to ask

the question, I’m afraid if I have wrong pronunciation and grammar. Actually, if I make

a mistake, the teacher will correct the sentence or the prononciation, but I’m shy to ask. If I have questions in the class, I will ask my classmate using Indonesian, but sometimes

I use English .”

Learning from the participant’s response above, the fear of making mistakes in

grammar and pronunciation may be the reason why the participants practiced English with

(27)

17

Q21 I try to relax whenever I feel afraid

of using English.

It can be seen from Table 5 that the highest item of this strategy is Question 23 (Q23)

“I encourage myself to speak English even when I am afraid of making a mistake” (M=3.33).

It means that they sometimes used this strategy in learning vocabulary. The students actually

did not have confidence in using English, but they tried to push themself to use the language

in learning vocabulary. Similarly, the participants also sometimes used the strategy stated in

Q21 “I try to relax whenever I feel afraid of using English” (M=3.00). It seemed that they

encourage themselves to speak English, even she was afraid of making a mistake in using

English.

Student E, as the representative of this strategy said that she tried to encourage herself

to talk to native speakers. She believed that by pushing herself she would achive her goal to

(28)

18

I hope I can speak English, I want to learn how to speak English because I want to have a career in Public Relation. As a Public Relation officer, we will communicate with many people including native speaker of English. Sometimes I skype with native speaker of English to practice my ability in speaking English, and I can find new vocabulary through my conversation although I am afraid to make mistake in

grammar.”

Learning from the participant’s response above, the student has a motivation in

learning English. The motivation could make the student encourage herself in learning

English. However, the participants did not generally use the strategy in Question 23 (Q23) “I

give myself a reward or treat when I do well in English” (M=2.38). They probably did not see

the importance of rewarding themselves for the good things that they had done. Nonetheless,

Student F used this strategy by giving herself compliment after speaking in English. To her,

being able to use English to speak to her teacher made her proud of herself.

After I asked a question to the lecturer using English, I immediately praise for being able to ask a question in English, it made me proud of myself.”

Based on the excerpt above, Student F gave positive motivation to encourage herself

to have better result in learning English even though she was afraid to ask her question to the

(29)

19

word. 28% 67% 5% 0% 100%

Q13 When I can’t think of a word during a

conversation in English, I use gestures..

1

From Table 6 above, it can be seen that the strategies Q11 “To understand unfamiliar

English words, I make guesses” (M=3.05) and Q13 “When I can’t think of a word during a

conversation in English, I use gestures” (M=3.00) were sometimes used by the participants.

These two strategies were the most frequently used compensation strategies. Student C as the

representative of the study, said that she would guess the meaning of the difficult words that

she found in reading texts from the context. She would focus on the meaning of the whole

sentence and not the meaning of word by word in that respective text.

If I read a text in PR course book, sometimes I find difficult word, so I try to guess the meaning from the next word, or I intrepret the whole sentence not for each word.”

Meanwhile, the lowest item for compensatory strategies is Q12 “I read English

without looking up every new word”(M=1.77). The mean indicates that the participants did

not generally read English without looking up every new word. In other words, most

participants still looked up every new word in dictionaries while reading English texts.

Nevertheless, it was not the case with Student C. She said that she did not need dictionary to

find the meaning of the difficult word. She preferred to guess the meaning from the context

although her guess may not be accurate.

I rarely used dictionary to look up the meaning of difficult vocabulary because, it takes too long to open the dictionary, so I prefer guessing the meaning even though it is not

(30)

20

According to Oxford (as cited in Schmitts, 2000) compensation strategies were

communication strategies that used by students to help their lack of vocabulary in learning

English language. Probably the students do not understand some words in English, so the

student prefer guessing the words, and try reading English book without looking up the

meaning in dictionary. Student C used this strategies to increase her vocabulary even if she

thought her guess is not accurate. The student also did not look up the dictionary when she

found difficult word. It means that the students want to develop her vocabulary without any

help from the dictionary.

Memory Strategies

Table 7 below shows the use of memory strategies by sophomore in Public Relation

Department.

Table 7. Memory Strategies

No. Strategies 1 2 3 4 Total Mean

Q1 I use new English words in a sentence

so I can remember them

(31)

21

In Table 7 above, it can be seen that the participants sometimes used all of the

strategies under the memory strategies, but the highest mean is Question (Q1) “I use new

English words in a sentence so I can remember them” (M=2.94). Student A as the

representative of this strategy said

“If I get a new vocabulary I will use it in a sentence while reviewing BIP 1 lesson. For

example, I got a new vocabulary “succinctly” so I will use it in a new sentence like “the

case is succinctly.”

Then, I tried ask the student to make another example for the item, and she gave the

following example “ Good communication is the lifeblood of organization.”

The bold word is the new vocabulary that she got in class, and when I asked the

meaning of “lifeblood”. She answered,

Lifeblood is lifestyle, isn’t it? Or something important? I forgot the meaning of it”

Learning from the student’s response,she could sometimes make mistakes although

student A tried to do the strategy. For example, she used “succinctly” incorrectly.

“Succinctly” means said in clear and short way, for example “I thought she expressed her

feeling most succintly at the meating” and student A has a different meaning about

“succinctly” in her example. Probably student A used this strategy to learn new vocabulary

but sometimes she is still confused in using the vocabulary in the sentences.

The lowest item in this strategy is Q3 “I physically act out new English words”

(M=2.50). In this strategy the student A said that she rarely used this item because it was

difficult. Sometimes the words cannot be acted.

I seldom use this strategy because it’s difficult to do. For example when we want act

out the word “ succintly”. How to act it out?”

Oxford (2003) stated memory strategies are often used for memorizing vocabulary

and structures in initial stages of language learning. Some student in Public Relation

(32)

22

student A did not use this strategies because some of word hard to act out. Probably this

strategies can make some of students easy to understand new vocabulary but some students

can not use this strategies because some of word hard to act out. In fact, memory strategies

were the least frequently used strategies in this study.

Conclusion

As what has been stated above, the aim of the present study was to find what

Vocabulary Learning strategies were used by the sophomores in Public Relations Department

in Satya Wacana Christian Univesity. The results of the study showed that the most

frequently used Vocabulary Learning Strategies by the students was metacognitive strategies

(M=3.66), followed by cognitive strategies (M=3.55), social strategies (M=3.33), affective

strategies (M=3.33), compensation strategies (M=3.05), and finally memory strategies

(M=2.83).

Some interesting points were also found in this study. First, instead of reading texts,

students preferred to watch TV or movies in English with or without English subtitles from

which they could learn new vocabularies, the pronunciation, and the target cultures. Second,

students preferred practicing using English with their friends and siblings to practicing with

their teacher because they felt more comfortable. Third, although they tried to encourage

themselves to use English, they did not generally reward themselves when they did well in

English. It seems that students did not find it important in learning the target language.

Finally, students did try to use the words they just learned in new sentences. However, they

could sometimes make mistakes in doing so. Thus, teacher’s assistance is needed.

The finding suggests that the teacher should be aware of the strategies used by the

students. The teacher might also get better knowledge on how to teach and what strategies

(33)

23

confused to use a new word in a sentence. Thus, the teacher may guide the students to use a

new word in new sentences. The teachers can help justify which sentence is correct or

incorrect. The strategies found in the present study suggest that the teacher can try another

strategies to teach new vocabulary to the students. For the students, they may know other

vocabulary learning strategies and encourage them to try the strategies to improve their

vocabulary.

There are two limitations in this present study. First, the participants were only 18

students. The number of the participants was limited because the number of sophomores of

Public Relations Departement is limited too. Second, the BIP 1 class only open in that

semester. The research was done only in one semester. So, the researcher conducted the study

in a short period. The short period made the researcher could not do the observation in the

class. Therefore, the suggestion for the further study may involve more participants to study

more issues on the vocabulary learning strategies in Public Relations Department. Also, the

further research should consider the time to study the issues and observe the students to

(34)

24

Acknowledgement

The researcher belived that this thesis would not have been finished and completed without

much help and support from my beloved people. First, the researcher would like to say thank

to my Jesus Christ who is always by my side. The researcher wishes to express my gratitude

to my supervisor, Mrs. Gita Hastuti who was abudantly helpful and patient in guiding me to

finish the thesis in a limitated time. Deepest gratitude to my examiner Miss Vica Ananta for

her advice, comments and assistances so that this study could be completed. The researcher

would like to say thanks to Mrs. Lina Sinatra because without her permission, the researcher

would not be able to conduct the resaerch in Public Relation Department. The researcher will

also express my gratitude and love to my family for their support, endelss love and the

second chance. My dad, Sulistya who always understand my flaw; my mother, my sister and

my brother for the support that they give to me. The researcher would also like to thank to all

lecturers and staff of English Department for all valuable and great support, knowledge, and

experiences. Finally, the researcher would also like to thank to all my friends; Vania

Dezmonda, Reza septriyasa, Eskatologia Sopranata, Daniel Rahadi, Bintang Amelia, Virna

Margetan as advisor, and Briggita Betsy. Finally, I am very grateful for being a part of FLL

family, a part of Twelvers. They will definitely be the “home” I long for. For everybody who

the researcher have not mentioned in this page, the researcher deeply appreciate every single

(35)

25 References

Amirian, S. M. R., & Heshmatifar, Z. (2013). A survey on vocabulary learning strategies: A case of Iranian EFL university students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(3), 636-641.

Bonsa,G.,B & Wolde, M. G. S. (2014). Vocabulary Learning Strategies used by EFL Students: the Case of 11th Gade High and Low Achievers at Jorgo Nole Preparotory School. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences.Vol 9, No 2 (2014); 17-331998-8907.

Chi,K.,& Tam,H.(2013).A Study on Language Learning Strategies (LLSs) of University Students in Hong Kong.Taiwan Journal of Linguistics.11(2),1-42.

Dahana,A. (2013). Vocabulary Learning Strategies used by Students of Sekolah Dasar Negeri 10 Salatiga. Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Institutional Repository. Retrived from: http://repository.uksw.edu/handle/123456789/3403

Desiana,T,A. (2014).Vocabulary Learning Strategies of Students in Economic International Program.Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Institutional Repository.Retrived from:http://repository.uksw.edu/bitstream/123456789/5452/1/T1_112010042_Judul.p df

Frankie Subon -Vocabulary Learning Strategies Employed by Form 6 Students. published at: International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), Volume 3, Issue 6, June 2013 Edition

Ghazal, L. (2007) Learning Vocabulary in EFL Contexts through Vocabulary Learning Strategies: Novitas-ROYAL, .p.85.

Hadavi,M.,& Hashemi,Z., (2014). Comparative Analysis of Vocabulary Learning Strategies in Learning English as a Foreign Language among Freshmen and Senior Medical Sciences Students Across Different Fields of Study.Malaysian IELTS Journal. 10(2), 19-33.

Hastuti. (2014).Exploring STAIN Pekalongan Student’s Strategies in Learning English.Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora. Vol 15, No 2.Publisher: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

(36)

26

Kovanen, M. J. (2014). Vocabulary Learning Strategies Employed by FINNISH High School EFL Students. University of Jyväskylä, Department of Languages English.

Lip, P. (2009). Investigating the Most Frequently Used and Most Useful Vocabulary Language Learning Strategies among Chinese EFL Postsecondary Students in Hong Kong. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(1),77-87.

Marttinen, M. (2008). Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by Upper Secondary School Students Studying English as a Second Language.University of Jyvaskyla, Finland.

Nosidlak, K. M. 2013. Vocabulary Learning Strategies of the Advanced Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4 (4). 655-661.Retrieved from http://jltr.academypublisher.com/ on February 15, 2016.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

Oxford, R. (2003). Toward A More Systematic Model Pf L2 Learner Autonomy. In Palfreyman, P., and Smith, R.(Eds.), Learner Autonomy Across Cultures:Language Education Perspectives (pp. 75-91). Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan.

Palaniappan, S.N., &Ramachandraiah,R.(2009).Public relations trainees handbook. Chennai: Anna Institute of management.

Saengpakdeejit, R. (2014). Awareness of vocabulary learning strategies among EFL students in Khon Kaen University. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(6), 1101-1108.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

(37)

27

APPENDIX

Questionnare

1. Nama: NIM: Nomor telpon:

2. Daftar pertanyaan ini tentang strategi - strategi untuk belajar kosa kata bahasa Inggris. Tujuan dari daftar pertanyaan ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana mahasiswa/mahasiswi Public Relation Department belajar kosa kata bahasa Inggris. Saya berharap teman-teman

berpartisipasi untuk memberikan opini terhadap daftar pertanyaan ini dengan jujur. Jawaban teman – teman tidak akan mempengaruhi penilaian pada kelas. Terimkasih untuk partisipasinya.

Pernyataan Sangat

Setuju Setuju Tidak Setuju

Sangat Tidak Setuju 1. Saya belajar kosa kata baru

(38)

28

10. Saya belajar bahasa Inggris dengan menonton acara Televisi atau film

berbahasa Inggris

11. Saya menebak makna kata yang tidak saya mengerti. Inggris dan saya tidak tahu beberapa kata, saya akan menggunakan bahasa tubuh.

14. Jika saya mendengar orang berbicara menggunakan bahasa Inggris saya akan menebak kata yang akan diucapkan selanjutnya. 15. Saya membuat jadwal agar

saya dapat belajar bahasa Inggris.

16. Saya memikirkan

perkembangan saya dalam pelajaran bahasa Inggris. 17. Saya mencari orang yang mampu berbicara bahasa 19. Saya memiliki tujuan yang

(39)

29 menggunakan bahasa

Inggris.

22. Saya memberikan hadiah kepada diri saya sendiri ketika saya dapat

berbahasa Inggris dengan baik.

23. Saya mendorong diri saya sendiri untuk berbicara dengan bahasa Inggris meskipun saya takut untuk menggunakan bahasa Inggris

24. Ketika saya tidak mengerti seseorang berbicara dalam bahasa Inggris. Saya akan meminta orang tersebut untuk mengulang kata itu kembali ataumemntanya untuk mengucapkannya secara perlahan.

Gambar

Table 2 Metacognitive Strategies...............................................................................
Table 1. SILL’s Key
FIGURE 1  Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used
Table 2 below  presents the use of metacognitive strategies by the participants.
+7

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Penelitian yang dilakukan oleh Maulina, Sumiati, dan Triyuwono (2009) berjudul Analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi Holding Period Saham Biasa pada Perusahaan Go Public yang

Kesimpulan penelitian yaitu: (1) implementasi kebijakan Bantuan Langsung Benih Unggul, pupuk bersubsidi dan perbaikan jaringan irigasi tidak efektif untuk mencapai

ᄋQ[GQQェGQQ@ Gjャセ Q ャBAャ

Penulis dalam hal ini lebih memperhatikan pada aspek ” Analisis Efektifitas Program Pinjaman Dana bergulir pada Unit Pengelola Kegiatan (UPK) PNPM Mandiri dan

Tabel Rekap Hasil Kuesioner Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Keterlambatan Waktu Proyek Konstruksi Wilayah Belitung pada Faktor Hubungan dengan

Pengabdian pada Masyarakat (PPM) Program Wisata Kampus ini dilaksanakan dengan tujuan untuk; (1) mengenalkan Kampus Fakultas Ilmu Keolaluagaan (FIK), Universitas Negeri

Keluarga merupakan organisasi pembelian konsumen yang paling penting dalam masyarakat, dan para anggota keluarga menjadi kelompok acuan primer yang paling berpengaruh. Kita

[r]