LAMPIRAN
Frequencies
Frequency Table
Statistics
63 63 63 63 63 63
0 0 0 0 0 0
43,0476 1,2857 1,7619 1,1429 1,2222 43,0000 1,0000 2,0000 1,0000 1,0000
50,00 1,00 2,00 1,00 1,00
19,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
75,00 2,00 2,00 3,00 2,00
2712,00 81,00 111,00 72,00 77,00 36,0000 1,0000 2,0000 1,0000 1,0000 43,0000 1,0000 2,0000 1,0000 1,0000 50,0000 2,0000 2,0000 1,0000 1,0000 Valid
Mis sing N
Mean Median Mode Minimum Maximum Sum
25 50 75 Percentiles
usia
63 100,0 100,0 19,00
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
jk
45 71,4 71,4 71,4
18 28,6 28,6 100,0
63 100,0 100,0 wanita
pria Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
ihc
15 23,8 23,8 23,8
48 76,2 76,2 100,0
63 100,0 100,0 kuat
lemah Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
dx
63 100,0 100,0 Anaplast
ANAPLAST Angiomat Atypical ATYPICAL Clear ce Fibrobla FIBROBLA meningot Meningot MENINGOT Ps ammoma PSAMMOMA
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
63 100,0 100,0 derajat 1 who
derajat 2 who derajat 3 who Total
Valid
Frequency Percent Valid P ercent
Cumulative Percent
outcome
49 77,8 77,8 77,8
14 22,2 22,2 100,0
63 100,0 100,0 hidup
mati Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Descriptives
Crosstabs
De scri ptive Statistics
63 56,00 19,00 75,00 43,0476 10,66261 113,691
63 1,00 1,00 2,00 1,2857 ,45538 ,207
63 1,00 1,00 2,00 1,7619 ,42934 ,184
63 2,00 1,00 3,00 1,1429 ,43467 ,189
63 1,00 1,00 2,00 1,2222 ,41908 ,176
63
N Range Minimum Maximum Mean St d. Deviat ion Variance
Case Processing Summary
63 100,0% 0 ,0% 63 100,0%
ihc * outcome
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Valid Missing Total
Cases
ihc * outcome Crossta bul ation
Count
hidup mati outcome
Total
Chi-Square Tests
1,406b 1 ,236
,689 1 ,406
1,320 1 ,251
,291 ,200
1,384 1 ,239
63 Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases
Value df
As ymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,33.
Crosstabs
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary
63 100,0% 0 ,0% 63 100,0%
ihc * who
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Valid Missing Total
Cases
ihc * w ho Crossta bula tion
Count
13 2 15
43 5 48
56 7 63
kuat lemah ihc
Total
derajat 1 who derajat 2 who who
Total
Chi-Square Tests
,098b 1 ,754
,000 1 1,000
,095 1 ,758
,667 ,534
,097 1 ,756
63 Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases
Value df
As ymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,67.
b.
Case Processing Summary
63 100,0% 0 ,0% 63 100,0%
outcome * who
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Valid Missing Total
KAPLAN MEYER
Frequency Table
outcom e * who Crosstabulation
Count
Chi-Square Tests
1,940b 1 ,164
,829 1 ,362
1,696 1 ,193
,177 ,177
1,909 1 ,167
63 Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio Fis her's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear As sociation N of Valid Cases
Value df
As ymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (2-sided)
Exact Sig. (1-sided)
Computed only for a 2x2 table a.
1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,56.
b.
jeniskelamin
18 28.6 28.6 28.6
45 71.4 71.4 100.0
63 100.0 100.0 L
P Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
26 41.3 41.3 100.0 63 100.0 100.0
2010.00
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Analisis prognosis
ki67
34 54.0 54.0 54.0
29 46.0 46.0 100.0
63 100.0 100.0 Kuat
Lemah Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
prognosis
49 77.8 77.8 77.8
14 22.2 22.2 100.0
63 100.0 100.0 Hidup
Mati Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
grading
56 88.9 88.9 88.9
7 11.1 11.1 100.0
63 100.0 100.0 1.00
2.00 Total Valid
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
De scri ptive Statistics
63 1.00 35.00 10.4127 9.46579 63
waktu
Valid N (lis twis e)
N Minimum Maximum Mean St d. Deviat ion
usiake l
1 1.6 1.6 1.6
63 100.0 100.0 <= 20
Frequency Percent Valid P erc ent
Crosstabs
[DataSet0]
ki67 * prognosis
Ca se P rocessi ng S um mary
63 100.0% 0 .0% 63 100.0%
63 100.0% 0 .0% 63 100.0%
63 100.0% 0 .0% 63 100.0%
63 100.0% 0 .0% 63 100.0%
ki67 * prognosis
jeniskelamin * prognosis us iakel * prognosis grading * prognosis
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Valid Missing Total
Cases
Crosstab
28 6 34
57.1% 42.9% 54.0%
21 8 29
42.9% 57.1% 46.0%
49 14 63
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
% within prognosis Count
% within prognosis Count
% within prognosis Kuat
Lemah ki67
Total
Hidup Mati prognosis
Total
Chi-Square Te sts
.895b 1 .344
.412 1 .521
.893 1 .345
.378 .260 63
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona
Lik elihood Ratio Fis her's Ex act Test N of Valid Cases
Value df
As ymp. Sig.
Computed only for a 2x 2 table a.
0 c ells (.0% ) have expected count less t han 5. The minimum expected count is 6. 44.
jeniskelamin * prognosis
usiakel * prognosis
Crosstab
15 3 18
30.6% 21.4% 28.6%
34 11 45
69.4% 78.6% 71.4%
49 14 63
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
% within prognosis Count
% within prognosis Count
% within prognosis L
P jeniskelamin
Total
Hidup Mati prognosis
Total
Chi-Square Te sts
.450b 1 .502
.113 1 .737
.469 1 .493
.739 .379 63
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona
Lik elihood Ratio Fis her's Ex act Test N of Valid Cases
Value df
As ymp. Sig.
Computed only for a 2x 2 table a.
10.2% 14.3% 11.1%
17 3 20
34.7% 21.4% 31.7%
18 4 22
36.7% 28.6% 34.9%
6 4 10
12.2% 28.6% 15.9%
2 0 2
4.1% .0% 3.2%
1 0 1
2.0% .0% 1.6%
49 14 63
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
% within prognosis Count
% within prognosis Count
% within prognosis Count
% within prognosis Count
% within prognosis Count
% within prognosis Count
% within prognosis Count
% within prognosis <=20 us iakel
Total
Hidup Mati prognosis
grading * prognosis
Chi-Square Tests
7.160a 6 .306
7.136 6 .308
63 Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio N of Valid Cases
Value df
As ymp. Sig. (2-sided)
10 cells (71.4%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .22.
a.
Crosstab
45 11 56
91.8% 78.6% 88.9%
4 3 7
8.2% 21.4% 11.1%
49 14 63
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Count
% within prognosis Count
% within prognosis Count
% within prognosis 1.00
2.00 grading
Total
Hidup Mati prognosis
Total
Chi-Square Te sts
1.940b 1 .164
.829 1 .362
1.696 1 .193
.177 .177 63
Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona
Lik elihood Ratio Fis her's Ex act Test N of Valid Cases
Value df
As ymp. Sig.
Computed only for a 2x 2 table a.
1 c ells (25. 0%) have ex pect ed c ount les s than 5. The minimum ex pec ted count is 1 56.
waktu
40.00 30.00
20.00 10.00
0.00
C
u
m
S
u
rv
iv
a
l
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
waktu
40.00 30.00
20.00 10.00
0.00
C
u
m
S
u
rv
iv
a
l
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
lemah-censored kuatlemah ki67kel
Survival Functions
Overall Comparisons
.611 1 .434
Log Rank (Mantel-Cox)
Chi-Square df Sig.
Test of equality of survival dis tributions for the different levels of ki67kel.
Overall Comparisons
.026 1 .871
Log Rank (Mantel-Cox)
Chi-Square df Sig.
Data pasien Meningioma
Nama
Usia
Jenis
Kelamin
Tahun Ki-67
Lemah/kuat
Hidup/Mati Waktu
bertahan
hidup(Bulan)
Grading
Kim Yan
55 P
2013
Lemah
Mati
1
1
Srikita
48 P
2013
Kuat
Hidup
12
2
Nurlela
Perangin
55 P
2014
Lemah
Mati
1
2
Rabiatul
Adawiyah
41 P
2013
Kuat
Hidup
12
1
Fatimah
75 P
2014
Lemah
Hidup
8
1
Suwartini
40 P
2014
Kuat
Hidup
1
1
Juniar
50 P
2014
Lemah
Mati
1
1
Kasmini
50 P
2013
Lemah
Hidup
12
1
waktu
40.00 30.00
20.00 10.00
0.00
C
u
m
S
u
rv
iv
a
l
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
laki-laki-censored perempuan laki-laki jnskelamin
