S KIM 1006793 Bibliography

(1)

Anisa Barkah Lisdiani, 2014

Profil Model Mental Siswa Pada Sub-Materi Pergeseran Kesetimbangan Kimia Dengan Menggunakan Tdm-Poe

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu Daftar Pustaka

Ainsworth, S. (2008). The Educational Value of Multiple-representations when Learning Complex Scientific Concepts. Models and Modeling in Science Education Visualization : Theory and Practice in Science Education. USA: Springer, (3), hlm.191.

Bonello, M. (2008). Sixth Grade Students’ Mental Models of Physical Education Concepts: A Framework Theory Perspective. Disertasi Doctor pada Department of Kinesiology School of Public Health: tidak diterbitkan.

Chang, R & Overby, J. (2011). General Chemistry The Essential Concepts (sixth ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

Chittleborough, G & Treagust, D. (2007). The Modelling Ability of Non-Major Chemistry Students and Their Understanding Of The Sub-Microscopic Level. Journal Royal Society of Chemistry, 8(3), hlm.274-292.

Chittleborough, G & Treagust, D. (2008). Correct Interpretation of Chemical Diagrams Requires Transforming from One Level of Representation to Another. Journal Research in Science Education, 38(4), hlm.463-482.

Chiu, M. H., Chou, C. C., & Liu, C. J. (2002). Dynamic Processes of Conceptual Change: Analysis of Constructing Mental Models of Chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39(8), hlm.688-712.

Coll, R. (2008). Chemistry Learners’ Preferred Mental Models for Chemical

Bonding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 5(1), hlm.22-47.

Dhindsa & Treagust. (2009). Conceptual Understanding of Bruneian Tertiary Student: Chemical Bonding and Structure. Journal Brunei of Science & Math Education, 1(1), hlm.33-51.

(2)

111

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Farida, I., Liliasari & Sopandi, W. (2011). Pembelajaran Berbasis Web untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Interkoneksi Multiple Level Representasi Mahasiswa Calon Guru pada Topik Kesetimbangan Larutan Asam-Basa. Jurnal Chemica, 12(1), hlm.14 – 24.

Firman, H. (2013). Penelitian Pendidikan Kimia. UPI: Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia.

Gilbert, J.K dan Treagust, D. (2009). Multiple Representations in Chemical Education. Australia: Springer.

Glynn, S.M., & Duit, R. (1995). Learning science meaningfully: Constructing conceptual models. Research reforming practice, _( ), hlm.3-33.

Ishlahihah, Novianti. (2012). Profil Model Mental Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Kesetimbangan Kimia. (Skripsi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2012, tidak diterbitkan).

Kala, dkk. (2012). The Effectiveness of Predict–Observe–Explain Technique in Probing Students’ Understanding About Acid–Base Chemistry: A Case For The Concepts of pH, pOH, and Strength. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, (11), hlm.555-574.

Marumure, G. (2012). Problems and Prospects of Teaching Chemical Equilibrium at The Further Education and Training (Fet) Band. University of South Africa.

Norman, D.A. (1983). Some Observations on Mental Models. New Jersey: Erlbaum Associates.

(3)

112

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Silberberg. (2007). Principles of General Chemistry. Newyork: Mc.Graw Hill Companies inc.

Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning Difficulties in Chemistry: An Overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, (4), hlm.2-20.

Wang, C. (2007). The Role of Mental Modeling Ability, Content Knowledge, and

Mental Models in General Chemistry Students’s Understanding About

Molecular Polarity. Disertasi Doctor of Philosophy in University of Missouri-Columbia: tidak diterbitkan.

Wasonowati. (2014). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Pada Pembelajaran Hukum-Hukum Dasar Kimia Ditinjau Dari Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X IPA SMA Negeri 2 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 3, hlm.66-75.

White & Gunston. (1992). Probing Understanding. London, Falmer Press.