REFERENCES
Abiddin, Z. N. (2007). Challenges in Ph.D studies: The case of arts student. European Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.5(2), pp. 83-93.
Acker, S., Hill, T. & Black, E. (1994). Thesis Supervision in the social sciences: Managed or Negotiated? Higher Education, Vol.28, pp. 483-498.
Adrian-Taylor, S., Noels, K. & Tischler, K. (2007). Conflict between international graduate students and faculty supervisor: Toward effective conflict prevention and management strategies. Journal of Studies in
International education, Vol. 11(1),pp. 90-117.
Alamis, M. P. (2010). Evaluating Students‘ Reactions and Responses to Teachers‘ Written Feedbacks. Philippine ESL Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 57-72
Anderson, D. J. Major, R. L. & Mitchell, R. R. (1992). Teacher supervision that works: A guide for university supervisors. New York: Praeger.
Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the Mix Right Again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol.4(2).
Anson, C. M. (1989). Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.
APA. (2003). Publication Manual. Washington D.C.: Author.
Armstrong, S. (2004) The Impact of Supervisor‘s Cognitive Styles on the Quality of Research Supervision in Management Education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.74, pp. 599-616
Arbur, R. (1977). The student-teacher conference. College Composition and Communication, Vol. 28(4), pp. 338-342.
Archer-Kath, J. D., Johnson, W. D., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Individual versus group feedback in cooperative groups. The Journal of Social Psychology, vol.134(5), pp. 681-694.
Arndt, V. (1993). Response to writing: using feedback to inform the writing process. In M. Dalam N. Brock and L. Walters (Eds.), Teaching
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C. & Razavieh, A. (1972). Introduction to research in education. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Askew, S. (2000). Feedback for Learning. London: Routledge Falmer.
Austin, A. (1991). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. New York:
Macmillan Publishing Company.
Bailey, F. & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers‘ reflection on their practices. Journal of Teaching in. Higher Education. Vol 15/2, pp. 187-189.
Baldwin, J. R. (1999). Innovation, training and success. Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch
Balzer, W. K., Doherty, M. E., & O‘Connor, R., Jr. (1989). Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin, 106(3), 410–433
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A. & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61 (2), 213–238.
Bates, L. L. (1993). Writing clearly: Responding to ESL composition. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Berg, C. E. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students‘ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 8, pp. 215– 237.
Bergman, M.M. (2009) Advances in Mixed Methods Research. London: Sage
Biantoro, A.W. (2009) Metode Penelitian Ekonomi Islam: Perbedaamn Skripsi, Tesis, and Disertasi. Media Informasi Mahasiswa Pascasarjana UIKA
Biber, D., T. Nekrasova & B. Horn. (2011). The effectiveness of feedback for L1-English and L2 writing development: A meta-analysis. (TOEFL iBT Research Report No. 14). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Bitchener, J. & Young, S. A. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. Vol.14, pp. 191–205
Bitchener, P.J., Basturkmen, H., East, M. & Meyer, H. (2011). Best Practice in Supervisor Feedback to Thesis Students. Wellington: Ako Aotearoa
Black, P. H. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
Black, P. & William, D. (1998) Assessment in classroom learning. Assessment Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, Vol. 5/1, 7-74
Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 Sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-on-one tutoring. Educational Researcher Vol.13, pp. 8-16.
Blumberg, A. (1978). Supervision and interpersonal intervention. Journal of Classroom Interaction, Vol. 13/1, 23–32.
Bolker, J. (1988) Writing Your Dissertation in Fifteen Minutes a Day. New York: Henry Holt and Company, LLC.
Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, Vol. 22/2, pp. 151-167.
Boud, D. & Falchikov, N. (2006) Aligning assessment with long term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 31/4. 399-413
Bower, Jack & Kawaguchi, Satomi (2001).Negotiation of Meaning and Corrective Feedback. Language Learning & Technology, Volume 15/1, pp. 41–71 .
Braunstein, J. W. (2007). Research Methodology Help for Dissertation Students. ResearchConsultation.com.
Brender, A. (1998). Conferencing: An Interactive Way to Teach Writing. The LanguageTeacher Online. Retrieved May 3, 2008, from
http://www.jaltpublications.org/tlt/files/98/jul/brender.html.
Brockner, J., S. Grover, T. Reed, R. DeWitt, and M. O‘Malley 1987 ―Survivors‘ reactions to layoffs: We get by with a little help for our friends.‖ Admin- istrative Science Quarterly, 32: 526–542.
Brookhart, S. M. (2008) How to give effective feedback to your students. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
Brophy, J.E. (1981) Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Reseach, 51 (1), pp. 5-32
Brounstein, M. (2014) Giving Constructive. Retrieved 24 January 2014 from Feedback.http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/giving-constructive-feedback.html
Brounstein, M. ( 2012). Giving Constructive Feedback, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc,
http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/giving-constructive-.
Brown, R. (1994) The 'big picture' about managing writing, in: O. Zuber-Skerritt & Ryan, Y. (Eds) Quality in Postgraduate Education, pp. 38-50. London: Kogan Page
Brown, L. (2004). Diversity: the challenge for higher education. Race, Ethnicity and Education, Vol. 7/1, pp. 21-34.
Brown, R.B. & Glover, A. (2006) Doing Your Dissertation in Business and Management. The Reality of Researching and Writing. London: Sage Publications
Brutus, S. & Manoogian, S. (1997)The art of feedback . Leadership in Action, Vol.17/3, pp. 8-10.
Buswell, J. & Matthews, N. (2004) Feedback on Feedback! Encouraging students to use feedback: a University of Gloucestershire case study. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education Vol.3/1, pp. 61-72
Butler, D.L. & Winne, P.H. (1995) Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 65/3, pp. 245-281.
Calkins, L. M. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Camp, C.L., Gregory, J.K., Lachman, N., Chen, L.P., Juskewitch, J.E. & Pawlina, W. (2010) Comparative efficacy of group and individual feedback in gross anatomy for promoting medical student
professionalism. Mayo Medical School, Minnesota: American Association of Anatomists.
Carson, J. & Nelson, G. 1996. ‗Chinese students‘ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction‘. Journal of Second Language Writing. Vol. 5/1, pp. 1-9.
Carson, J. & Nelson, G. (1994) Writing groups: cross-cultural issues. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 3/1, pp. 17 – 30.
Castle, P., Incledon, V. & Waring, M. (2008). Enhancing feedback: The
development of a Criterion based marking template for students on a sport degree programme. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, Vol. 7/1, pp. 89-98.
Charliepeu (2011) Group learning versus Individual work, retrieved 12 May 2013 from http://charliepeu8b8.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/group-learning-versus-individual-work/
Charmaz, Kathy (1983) "The grounded theory method: An explication and
interpretation", in Contemporary field Research: A Collection of Readings, Robert M. Emerson, ed., Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 109-128.
Chen, S. (2002). A cognitive model for non-linear learning in hypermedia programmes. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 33/4, pp. 449–460
Chenoweth, N. A. &Luppescu, S.(1993). Attitudes and preferences of ESL students to error correction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 6/1, pp. 79-87.
Cho, K. S. ( 2006). Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. WrittenCommunication, Vol. 23, pp.260–294.
Clare, J. (2003). Writing a PhD Thesis. Dalam &. H. J. Clare., Writing
Clare, Judith, and Hamilton, Helen (2003).Writing Research: Transforming Data into Text. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Coffin, C., Curry, M.J., Goodman., Hewings, A., Lillis, T.M. & Swann, J. (2003) Teaching Academic Writing: A toolkit for higher education. London: Routledge
Cohen, A.D. & Cavalcanti, M.C. (1990). Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research insights for the classroom. verbal report. Cambridge: CUP.
Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1994). Research Methods in Education. New Your: Routledge
Connell, R. W. (1985). 'How to supervise a PhD'. Vestes Vol. 2, pp. 38-41.
Connole, H. (1993). ‗The research enterprise.‘ In Connole, H., Smith, J.,
Wiseman, R. (1993) (Eds). Research methodology 1: Issues and methods in research. Study guide. Melbourne: Deakin University.
Connolly, P. (2004) Boys and Schooling in the Early, Routledge: Routledge Falmer
Connors, K. & Asenavage, K. (1994) Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing. Vol. 3/3, pp. 257-276
Connors, R.J. & Lunsford, A.A. (1993).Teachers‘ rhetorical comments on student papers. College Composition and Communication, Vol. 44/2), pp. 200-223
Cooley, L. & Lewkowicz, J. (2003) Dissertation Writing in Practice, Turning Ideas into. Hongkong: Hongkong University Press.
Cooper, H. (2010). Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-By-Step Approach. Los Angeles: Sage.
Cooper, L. W. ( 2001). A comparison of online and traditional computer application classes. T.H.E. (Technological Horizons in Education) Journal, Vol. 28/8, pp. 52–58.
ScienceEducation, pp. 249-276. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum).
Corbin, Juliet & Anselm Strauss (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research:
Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners‘ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 4, pp. 161-170.
Cornwall, M. G., Schmithals, F. & Jaques, D. (Eds.). (1977). What is project orientation? An overview. In Proceedings of the Seminar on Project Orientation in Higher Education, 1–16. University of Bremen,March 1976, University ofLondon, Institute of Education.
Cowan, J. (2003). Assessment for learning – giving timely and effective feedback‘. Exchange, Spring Vol. 4, pp. 21–22.
Crook, C. (1998). Children as computer users: The case of collaborative learning. Computers and Education, Vol. 30, pp. 237-247
Cullen, D., Pearson, M., Saha, L. J., & Spear, R. H. (1994). Establishing effective PhD supervision. Canberra: AGPS
Dale, K. (2010). Providing Students with Effcetive Feedback. Academic Leadership, The online Journal. Vol. 4/4.
Davies, A .(2003) Feed Back ... Feed Forward: Using Assessment to Boost Literacy Learning Originally published in Primary Leadership. Vol.2 No. 3 Spring Issue (2000) p.53-55.
Davinson, D. (1977). Theses and Dissertations as Information Sources. London: Clive Bingley.
Delamont, S., Atkinson, P. & Pary, O. (1999) Supervising the PhD: A Guide to Success Buckingham: Open University Press.
Donnely, R. & Fitzmaurice, M. (n.d.) Resource Pack on Supervising Postgraduate Students. Dublin Institute of Technology
Dragga, S.(1991).Responding to technical writing. Technical Writing Teacher, Vol. 18/3, pp. 202-221.
pp. 19-22.
Edlin, A. (2001). The Nature of Written Feedback: A study of postgraduate
lecturers’ Perspectives. A Thesis for Master Degree of Education. New Zealand: Unitec.
Educators, A. ( 2011). Grammar & Vocabulary. D & B Mann Webmasters. http://www.aussieeducator.org.au/images/auslogo.png.
Eggleston, J. & Delamont, S. (1983). Supervision of Students for Research Degrees.Birmingham: ALBERA.
Elawar, M. C. & Corno. L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers' written feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol .77/2, pp. 162-173. Ellis, R. (2009). A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types. ELT
Journal. Vol.63/2 April 2009
Ellis, R. A. & Calvo, R. A. (2004). Learning through discussions in blended environments. Educational Media International, Vol. 41/3, pp. 263–274.
Ellis, R.S., Murakami, M. & Takashima, H. (2008) The effects of focussed and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System Vol. 36, pp. 353-371
Emerson, L.(2007) Ed. Writing Guidelines for Education Students. Australia: Thomson
Emilia, E. (2008). Menulis Tesis dan Disertasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Engebretson, K., Smith, K., McLaughlin, D., Seibold, C. Teret, G., & Ryan, E. (2008). The changing reality of research education in Australia and
implications for supervision: a review of the literature. Teaching inHigher Education, 13(1) 1–15.
Evans, D. & Gruba, P. (2002).How to Write a Better Thesis. Victoria: Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Fathman, A.K. & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing (pp. 178-190). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Second Language Writing, 10(4), 235-249.
Fedor, D. B. (1991). Recipient responses to performance feedback: A proposed model and its implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 9,73–120.
Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. Dalam K. H. (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. (pp. 81-104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D. (2003a). Responding to writing: Exploring second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 119–140).
Ferris, D. (2003b). Response to Student Writing: Implication for Second- Language Students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes. A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 8, pp. 1–10.
Ferris, D. (1995). Can advanced ESL students be taught to correct their most serious Serious and frequent errors?. CATESOL Journal, Vol. 8/1, pp. 41-62.
Ferris, D. & Hedgcock, J. S. (2004).Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process,and Practice (2 nd Ed.). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ferris, D. & Roberts, B (2001). ‗Error Feedback in L2 Writing Classes: How Explicit Does It Need to Be?‘. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol.10, pp.161–184.
Fox, B. (1993). The human tutorial dialogue project: Issues in the design of instructional systems. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Freebody, P. (2003). Qualitative research in education. Interaction and practice. London: SAGE Publications.
Freedman, S. (1985). The Acquisition of written language. Response and Revision. New Jersey: Ablex.
Frijda, N.H. (1986) The Emotions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Working Together for Improvement. Beckenham: Open University Press. pp 28–29.
Garci a, M .E., M al ott, R .W . & Bret hower, D. (1988). A s ys t em of t hes is and dis s ert ation supervision: Helping graduate students succeed.Teaching of Psychology, Vol. 15, pp. 186–191
Gay, L. M. (2006). Educational Research: Competencies and Applications. New Jersey: Pearson.
Gay, L.R., Mills, J.E., & Airasian, P.(2006). Educational Research: Competencies and Applications. New Jersey: Pearson.
Glatthorn, A. A.& Joyner, R. L. (2005). Writing the Winning Theses or Dissertation:A Step by Step Guide, California: Corwin Press.
Goldstein, L. (2006). 'Feedback and Revision in Second Language Writing: Contextual, Teacher, and Student Variables'. Dalam K. a. Hyland, Feedback in Second Language Writing (pp. 185–205). New York: CUP Goldstein, L. & Conrad, S. (1990).‖ Student input and negotiation of meaning in
ESL writing conferences.‖ TESOL Quarterly, 24
Goodman, J. S., & Wood, R. E. (2004). Feedback specificity, learning
opportunities, and learning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 809- 821.
Gottschalk, Katherine, & Hjortshoj, Keith. (2004). The elements of teaching writing: A resource for instructors in all disciplines. Boston: Bedford/St.
Martin's.
Grabe, W. (2001). Notes towards a theory of second language writing (pp. 39-57) New Jersey: Lawrernce Erlbbaum.
Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and Practice of Writing. The USA: Longman.
Graduate School of Communication (2010). The Master‘s thesis and the role of the tutor/thesis supervisor in the new Communication Science Master‘s programme. University of Amsterdam
Green, B. (2005). Unfinished business: subjectivity and supervision. Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 24 /2, pp. 151-163.
Greene, J. C. & Caracelli, V.J. (1997a) Defining and describing the paradigm issue in mixed method evaluation. New Direction for Evaluation, Vol. 74, pp. 5-17
Greene, J. C. & Caracelli, V. J. (Eds) (1997b). Advances in mixed-method
evaluation: The challenges and benefits ofintegrating diverse paradigms (pp. 19-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E. & and Neale, M. A. (2003). "Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle in Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology,". MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27/2.
Guffey, M. R. (2006). Business Commnunication: Process and Product. Toronto: Nelson.
Guide on Thesis Supervision (2010-2011)Handbook for Research Postgraduate Studies 2010-2011 Retrieved December 18,2010 from
www.ust.hk/vpaao/pg/rpghandbook/supervision/guide.html
Hairston, M. (1986). On not being a composition slave. In c.w. Bridges (ed.), Training the new teacher of college composition, Urbana, Il: ncte.
Hann, M. A. (2004). Computer anxiety and students' preferred feedback methods in EFL writing. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 88/3, pp. 403-415.
Hara, N. B. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied
educational psychology. Instructional Science, Vol. 28/2, pp. 115–152.
Harding, A. G. (1973). The objectives and structure of undergraduate projects. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 4, pp. 216–232.
Harman, G. (2002) Producing PhD Graduates in Australia for the Knowledge Economy. Higher Education Research & Development,
Vol. 21/2, pp.180-190
Harris, M. (1986). Teaching one-to-one: The writing conference. National Council of Teachers of English.
Harvard Writing Project Bulletin (2000). Responding to Student Writing. Boston: The President and Fellows of Harvard College
Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007).The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 77/1, pp. 81-101.
Hatziapostolou, T & Paraskakis, I. (2010) ―Enhancing the Impact of Formative Feedback on Student Learning through an Online Feedback System‖ Electronic Journal of e-Learning Volume 8 Issue 2 2010, pp.111 - 122.
Hawkins & Shohet (2006) Supervision in the Helping Professions. Berkshire, England: OUP
Haythornthwaite, C. & Kazmer,M.M. (2002) ―Bringing the Internet Home: Adult Distance Learners and Their Internet, Home, and Work Worlds,‖ in The Internet in Everyday Life, ed. Barry Wellman and Caroline
Haythornthwaite (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2002), pp. 431–463
Heath, T. (2002). A quantitative analysis of PhD students' views of supervision. Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 21/1, pp. 41-53.
Hefferman, J. & Lincoln, J. (1996) Writing: a concise handbook. New York: Norton.
Heift, T. & Caws, C. (2000). Peer feedback in synchronous writing environments: A case study in French. Educational Technology & Society 3(3).
Heppner, P. P., & Handley, P. G. (1981). A study of the interpersonal influence Process in supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 28, pp. 437-444.
Holmberg, B. (1989). Theory and practice of distance education. London: Routledge.
Holmes, P. (2005). Ethnic Chinese students‘ communication with cultural others in a New Zealand University. Communication Education, Vol. 54(4),pp. 289-311.
Holmes, L. & Smith, L. (2003)Student evaluation of faculty grading methods. Journal of Education for Business, July/August 2003, Vol. pp. 318–323.
Horowitz, D. (1986). Process, not product: Less than meets the eye. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 20/1, pp. 141-154.
Hounsell, D. (2004). Reinventing feedback for the contemporary Scottish university‘. Improving F eedback to Students Workshop. Glasgow: available at www.enhancement themes.ac.uk/uploads/documents /Hounsellpaper.doc
Hounsell, D. I. (1987). Essay writing and the quality of feedback, Student Learning: research in education and cognitive psychology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and Synchronous E-Learning. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, Vol. 31/4 (October–December 2008).
Hsu, C. (2009). Writing partnerships. Reading Teacher, Vol. 63/2, pp. 153-158.
Huang, R. (2006). ‗A challenging but worthwhile learning experience!‘ Asian international student perspectives of undertaking a dissertation in the UK. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, Vol. 6/1, pp. 29-38.
Huckin, T. (2006). Abstracting from abstracts. In M. Hewings (ed.), Academic Writing in Context. London : Continuum (pp. 93-103).
Hung, D., Tan, S. C. & Chen, D. T. (2005). How the Internet facilitates learning as dialog: design considerations for online discussions. International Journal of Instructional Media, Vol. 32/1, pp. 37–46.
Hyatt, D. (2005). ‗Yes, a very good point!‘: A critical genre analysis of a corpus of feedback commentaries on Master of Education assignments. Teaching in Higher. Education, 10(3) , 339–353.
Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 7, pp. 255-286.
Hyland, Fiona & Hyland, Ken, (2001) Sugaring the pill Praise and criticism in written Feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 10, pp. 185– 212
Hyland, K. (2009). Academic Discourse. London: Continuum.
Writing,. London: Longman.
Hyland, K. (1990). Providing productive feedback. ELT Journal, Vol. 44/4, pp. 294-304.
Hyland, K. (2006). F eedback in Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students‘ writing. Language Teaching Vol. 39, pp. 83–101.
Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, Vol. 25/2, 156–177.
Inoue, A. & Kubota, M. (1989) Error Treatment in a Japanese Language Classroom. WPEL, Vol. 10/2
Irons, A. (2008). Enhancing learning through formative assessment. New York: Routledge. New York: Routledge.
Ivanic, R. C. (2000). What am I supposed to make of this? The messages conveyed
to students by tutors’ written comments. Student Writing in Higher
Education: New Contexts. Buckingham: SHRE/Open University Press.
James, R. & Baldwin, G. (1999). Eleven practices of effective postgraduate supervisors. The Centre for the Study of Higher Education and The School of Graduate Studies, University of Melbourne. Retrieved May 15, 2007 from www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/pdfs/11practices.pdf
Jannetti, Anthony J. (2005) Case and Grounded Theory As Qualitative Research Methods. Retrieved 2 August 2012 from Users/TOSHIBA/Documents/ Dissertation, Draft 2012/Case and Grounded Theory As Qualitative Research Methods-Science News-red.Orbit.htm
Jasmine, J. & Weiner, W. (2007). The effects of writing workshop on abilities of first grade students to become confident and independent writers. Early Childhood Education Journal, Vol. 35/2, pp. 131-139.
Jin, L. & Cortazzi, M. (1998) Dimentions of dialogue: Large classes in China. International of Educational Research, Vol. 29, pp. 739-761.
Jinguji, M. (2008) The Importance of Feedback: Descriptive and Evaluative Feedback Retrieved 12 november 2013 from www.innovations4pe.com
research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company
Johnston, P. H. (2004). Choice words: How our language affects children’s learning. Portland, ME: Stenhouse
Jordan, J. (2004). The Use of Orally Recorded Exam Feedback as a Supplement to Written Comments. Journal of Statistics Education. Vol.12/1.
Jorgensen, Danny L. (1989) Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Juwah, C. (2004 ). Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback. The Higher Education Academy Generic Centre.
Kamler, B. & Thomson, P. (2006) Helping Doctoral Students Write: Pedagogies for Supervision. Oxon: Routledge
Karim, M. Z. & Ivy, T. I.(2011 ). The Nature of Teacher Feedback in Second Language (L2) Language Classrooms: A Study on Some private
universities in Bangladesh. Journal of Bangladesh Assosiation of Young Researchers. Vol. 1/1. pp.31- 48.
Kasanga, L. A. (2006). Students' Response to Peer andTeacher Feedback in a First-Year Writing Course. . Qaboos: Department of English Language and Literature, Sultan Qaboos University.
Kepner, C. G. (1991). An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written Feedback to the Development of Second-Language Writing Skills. The Modern Language Journal, 75.
Keyton, J. (2006 ) Communicating in Groups: Building Relationships for Effective Decision Making, 2nd Ed. Oxford: OUP
King, J. (2011) Policy on Feedback. Aberdeen: School of Language and
Literature, Retrieved May 20, 2013 from http://www.abdn.ac.uk/feedback /documents/Feedback/LL_feedback_policy.pdf
King, K. P. (2001). .Educators revitalize the classroom ―bulletin board‖: a case study of the influence of online dialogue on face-to-face classes from an adult learning perspective. Journal of Research on Computing in
Education, Vol. 33/4, pp. 337–354.
Kluger, A.N. & Denisi, A. (1998) Feedback interventions on performance: Towards the understanding of a double-edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 67-72
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.
Knafl, K. & Breitmayer, B. (1991). Triangulation in qualitative research: Issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. Dalam J. M. (Ed)., Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (hal. pp. 226-239 ). London: Sage Publishers.
Kohlbacher, F. (January 2006 ). The Use of Qualitative Content Analysis in Case Study Research. Forum: Qualitative Social Reserach. Vol. 7/1, pp.21-32 .
Kouritzin, S. G. (1999). Feedback on Feedback: Preservice ESLTeachers Respond to Evaluation Practices. lESL Canada Journal, Vol. 17/1
Krebs, S. A., Hobman, E. V., & Bordia, P. (2006). Virtual teams and group member dissimilarity. Small Group Research, Vol. 37/6, pp. 721-741.
Kumar, V. & Stracke, E. (2007). An analysis of written feedback on a PhD thesis. Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 12/4, pp. 461-470
Kurt, G. &. Atay, Derin (2007). The effects of peer feedback on the writing anxiety of prospective Turkish teachers of EFL. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, Vol. pp.12-23.
Lai, K. W. (2011). Using collaborative peer feedback and supervision to support. Proceedings ascilite 2011. Dunedin, New Zealand: Centre for Distance Education and Learning Technologies University of Otago College of Education, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Lalande, J. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 66 , pp. 140-149.
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: a conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies,. London: Routledge.
Lavery, J. J. (1964). Retention of a skill following training with and without instructions to retain. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 18, 275-281.
Lea, M. & Street, B. (1998). ‗Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach‘. Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 23/3, pp. 329–338.
Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing Vol. 17, pp. 144–164.
Leithwood, K. J. (1998). ‗Leadership and other conditions which foster
organizational learning in schools‘. Dalam K. L. (eds), Organizational Learning in Schools. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: issues in written response in Second Language Writing. in B. Kroll, Research Insights for the Classroom (pp. (57-71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leo, S. (2013) Kiat Jitu Menulis Skripsi, Tesis dan Disertasi, Jakarta: Erlangga
Leo, S. (2010) Kiat Jitu Menulis dan Menerbitkan Buku, Jakarta: Erlangga
Leo. S., Groth, C., Yugianingrum., Lilyana, S., Kendra, I.L. & Lukman, E.A (2007) English for Academic Purposes: Essay Writing. Yogyakarta: AndiOffset
Lepper, M.R. & R.W. Chabay(1988). Socializing the intelligent tutor: Bringing empathy to computer tutors. In Mandl and Lesgold (Eds.), Learning Issues for Intelligent. Tutoring Systems, Springer. pp. 114-137.
Lightbown, P.M. & N. Spada. (1999). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Lim, C. P. (2004). An activity-theoretical approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore schools: orienting activities and learner autonomy.
Computers & Education, pp. 43/3,pp. 215–236.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 42/4, pp. 276-287
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. (Edisi Kedua). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liu, J. & Sadler, R. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, Vol. 2, pp.193–227.
Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, Vol. 23, pp. 280-302.
Lou, Y., Abrami, P.C., & d‘Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 71/3, pp. 449-521.
MA Programme Director (2008). Guidelines for Supervisors and Supervisees Economics Postgraduate, retrieved24 October 2010 from www.
socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/.../dissertation/.../Guidelines_001.doc
Machi, L. (2009). The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
Maclellan, E. (2001). Assessment for learning: The differing perceptions of tutors andstudents. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 26/4, pp. 307 -318
Magill, R. A. (1993). Augmented feedback in skill acquisition. InR. N. Singer, M. Murphy, & L. K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook of research on sport psychology (pp. 193-212). New York: Macmillan.
Magney, J. (1997). Working and learning together. Techniques, Vol. 72/6, pp. 57-58.
Marjanovic, O. (1999). Learning and teaching in a synchronous collaborative environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 15/2,
pp. 129-138.
Marra, R. M., Moore, J. L. & Klimczak, A. K. (2004). Content analysis of online discussion forums: a comparative analysis of protocols. Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 52/2, pp. 23–40.
Mauch, J. &Park, N. (2003). Guide to successful thesis and dissertation: A handbook for students and faculty, 5th ed. New York: Marcel Dekker.
McAlister, S., Ravenscroft, A. & Scanlon, E. (2004). Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 20, pp. 194-204
McColskey, W., & Leary, M. R. (1985). Differential effects of norm-referenced and self-referenced feedback on performance expectancies, attribution, and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 275–284.
McClure, J. W. (2005). Preparing a Laboratory-based Thesis: Chinese
International Research Students‘ Experiences of Supervision. Teaching in Higher Education,Vol. 10/1, pp. 3-16.
McLeod, L. P., Baron, R. S., Weighner Marti, M., & Kuh Yoon, M. (1997) The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82/5, pp.706-718.
Meyer, K. A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: the role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 7/3, pp. 55–65.
Mills, C. & Matthews, N. (2009) Review of tutor feedback during
undergraduate dissertations: A case study Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, Vol. 8/1, pp. 108 – 116
Morrison, J. L., Oladunjoye, G. T. & Onyefulu, C. (2007). An Assessment of Research Supervision: A Leadership Model Enhancing Current Practices in Business and Management . Journal of Education for Business, March/ April, Vol. pp. 212-219.
Milton, J. (2006). Resource-rich Web-based feedback: Helping learners become independent writers. Dalam K. H. (Eds.), F eedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 123-139). New York: Cambridge University Press.
MLA Citation (2013) "Collaborative Leanrning And Architecture Education." 123HelpMe.com. Retrived 20 May 2013 from
<http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=33731>.
Educational. Technology Research and Development, Vol. 51/4, pp. 85–103.
Moore, J. D. (2004). Generating Tutorial Feedback with Affect. American Association for Artificial Intelligence. Vol. pp.923-928.
Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus. corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science, Vol. 32, pp.99–113.
Moriarti, M. (1997). Teaching Multicultured Students. London: John and Bartlett Publishers International.
Morrison, J. L., Oladunjoye, G. T. & Onyefulu, C. (2007). An Assessment of Research Supervision: A Leadership Model Enhancing Current Practices in Business and Management . Journal of Education for Business, March/ April, Vol 2, pp. 212-219.
Moses, I. (1985). Supervising postgraduates. Kensington, NSW: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia.
Murray, D.M. (2002) How to Write a Thesis. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press
Murray, H. (1985). Qassroom teaching behaviors related to college teaching effectiveness. Dalam J.G.Donald&A.M. Sullivan (Eds.), in Using researchto improve teaching. (pp. 21-34). San Francisco: Josey-Bass. Mustafa, R. F. (2012). Feedback on the Feedback: Sociocultural Interpretation of
Saudi ESL Learners‘ Opinions about Writing Feedback. English Language Teaching. Vol. 5/3
Mutch, A. (2003). Exploring the practice of feedback to students. Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 4/1,pp. 24-38.
Nah, W. (2008). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Written and Spoken Communication. http://communicatebetter.blogspot.com/2008/11/ advatages-and-disadvantages-of-written.html.
Naidu, M. (2007). The use of written feedback and conferencing in improving
students’ writing. Malaysia: Faculty of Management and Human Resource Development.
Nelson, G. & Carsen, J. (1998). ESL Students perception of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 7, pp. 113-131.
Nelson, G. & Murphy, J.M. (1993) Peer response group: DO L2 writers use peer comments in reveisng their drafts? Tesol Quorterly,Vol. 27/1,
pp.135-141.
Nelson and Schunn (2009). The nature of feedback: how different. Instr Sci, Vol.
8 pp. 375–401.
Newman, D. R., Webb, B. & Cochrane, C. (1996). A content analysis method to measure Critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Retrieved on 10 January 2012 from
http://www.qub.ac.uk/mgt/papers/methods/contpap.html
Nicol, D. (2008). Redesigning written feedback to students when class sizes are large. Paper for the 33rd Improving University Teaching Conference, Transforming higher education and learning in the 21st century. Improving University Teaching Conference, Transforming higher. Glassgow,
Scotland: Unversity of Strathclyde.
Nicol, D. J. & Macfarlane-Dick. D. (2006) Formative assessment and self- regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education (2006), Vol. 31/2, pp. 199-218
Nicol, David & Macfarlane-Dick, Debra Dick (2004) "Rethinking Formative Assessment in HE: a theoretical model and seven principles of good feedback practice" http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assessment/
ASS051D_SENLEF_model.doc
Nik, Y. A., Sani, Badariah. Bt. M., Chik, B. W., Jusoff, K. & Hasbollah, Hasif, R. B. (2010) The writing performance of undergraduates in the
University of Technology, Mara. Terengganu, Malaysia. Journal of Languages and Culture. Vol. 1/1, pp. 7–13.
Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
O‘Brien, R., & Sparshatt, L. (2007). Mind the gap! Staff perceptions of students’
perceptionof assessment feedback. Retrieved June 30, 2008, from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/events/conference/papers
Oshima, A. & Hogue, A. (1999). Academic English.(3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
Paltridge, B. & Starfield, S. ( 2007) Thesis and Dissertation Writing in a Second Language. A Handbook for Supervisors. London: Roultledge.
Patchan, M. M., Charney, D., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). A validation study of students‘ end comments: Comparing comments by students, a writing instructor, and a content instructor. Journal of Writing Research, Vol. 1/2, pp. 124-152
Patton, E. & Appelbaum, S.H. (2003). The Case for Case Studies in
Management Research. Management Research News [online], 26(5), pp. 60-71. Accessed: 5 February 2012 from
http://www.emeraldinsight.com.
Pearce, L. (2005). How to examine a thesis. . Berkshire, England: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002) Research Training and Supervision. Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 27/2, pp. 135-150
Pelligrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N. & Glaser, R. (eds) (2001) Knowing what Students Know – The Science and Design of Educational Assessment, Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
Peterson, S. (2010). Improving Student Writing Using Feedback as a Teaching Tool. Toronto: OISE/University of Toronto.
Peterson, S. (2003). Peer influences on students‘ revisions of their narrative writing. L-1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, Vol. 30, pp. 239–272.
Peterson, S., & McClay, J. (2010). Assessing and providing feedback for student writing in Canadian classrooms. Assessing Writing, Vol. 15/2.
Peterson, S. (2003). Peer influences on students‘ revisions of their narrative writing. L-1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 30, 239–272.
Pinnell, G. & Fountas, I. (1998) Word Matters. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Theory and Research, Volume XVII. New York: Agathon Press. Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Polanyi, M. ( 2002). P ersonal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Polio, C., Fleck, C. & Leder, N. (1998) If I only had more time: ESL learners‘ changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 7, pp. 43-68
Palomba, C & Banta, T. (1999). Assessment Essentials: Planning, Implementing, and Improving Assessment in Higher Education. San Francisco:
Jossey Bass.
Potter, J. (1994). Common Business English Errors in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Longman.
Pridemore, D. R. (1995). Control of practice and level of feedback in computer- based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 20, pp. 444–450.
Primethesis, C. (2009). Tips in Thesis Writing. Retrieved 16 january 2012 http://primethesis.com/blog/tips-in-thesis-writing/.
Prior, P. A. (1998). Writing/disciplinary: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum.
Prystowsky, J.B. & DaRosa, D.A. (2003). Learning Prescription Permits Feedback on Feedback, The American Journal of Surgery. Vol. 185. pp. 264-267 .
Race, P. (2001). Using feeedback to help students learn. The Higher Education Academyhttp://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/
detail/id432_using_feedback
Radecki, P. M. & Swales, J.M. (1988). ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work. System, Vol. pp. 355-365.
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in Higher Education(2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
Ray, S. (2007), Selecting a Doctoral Dissertation Supervisor: Analytical Hierarchy Approach to theMultiple Criteria Problem, International Journal of Doctoral Studies, Vol. 2, pp. 23-32
Reesor, M. (2002). Issues in written teacher feedback: A critical review. The English Teacher. Vol. 5,pp. 242-255.
Reid, J. (1998). The Process of Composition . New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Reid, J. (1993). Teaching ESL writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Regents Hall.
Rezael, S. ( 2011). Corrective Feedback in Task-based Grammar Instruction: A Case of Recast vs. Metalinguistic Feedback. Lambert : Lap Lambert Academic Publishing.
Rhodes, L. & Dudley-Marling, C. (1996). Readers and writers with a difference: A holistic approach to teaching struggling readers and writers (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Rickards, D. & Hawes, S. (2006) Connecting Reading and Writing Through Author's Craft The Reading Teacher.Vol. 60/4, pp. 370–373.
Robb, T., Ross, S. & Shortreed, I.(1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 20,pp. 83–93.
Rollinson, P. (1998). ‘Peer response and revision in an ESL writing group: A case study. Madrid: Unpublished PhD thesis. Universidad Autonoma de Madrid.
Rosen, B., Furst, S., & Blackburn, R. (2007). Overcoming barriers to knowledge sharing in virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 36/3, pp. 259-273.
Rowe, A.D. & Wood, L.N. (2006). What feedback do students want? Sydney, Australia : Macquarie University.
Rubel, C. & Wallace, M. (2010). Instructor Tone in Written Communication: Are We Saying What We Want Them to Hear?. In Proceedings of TCC – Teaching Colleges and Community Worldwide Online Conference 2010 (pp. 1-15). Retrieved November 22, 2013 from
Rudestam, K.E. & Newton, R.R. (1992) Surviving Your Dissertation. London: Sage Pblications
Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice Vol. 5/1, no.77-84.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science. Vol. 18,pp. 119-144. .
Saito, H. (1994). Teachers‘practices and students‘ preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of Adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, Vol.11/2, pp. 46-70.
Salager-Meyer, F. ( 1990). Discoursal flaws in Medical English Abstract: A Genre Analysis per Research and Text Type. Text. Vol. 10/4, pp. 365-384.
Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A, & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowl- edge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355-386.
Sarason, S. B. (1996). Revisiting ‘The Culture of the School and the Problem of
Change’. New York: Schunk, D.H. & Zimmerman, B.J. (1994) Self- regulation of learning and performance: issuesand educational applications.(New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schunk, D.H. & Zimmerman, B.J. (1994) Self-regulation of learning and
performance: Issues and educational applications. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schunk, D. I. (989). ‗Self efficacy and cognitive skill learning‘. Research on Motivation in Education, San Diego, CA, Academic Press, pp. 13–44.
Schwartz, F. & White, K. (2000). Making sense of it all: Giving and getting online course feedback. In K. W. White & B. H. Weight (Eds.), The online teaching guide: A handbook of attitudes, strategies, and techniques for the virtual classroom (pp. 57–72). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Seagram B., Gould, J. & Pyke, S. (1998). An Investigation of Gender and Other Variableson Time to Completion of Doctoral Degrees. Research in Higher Education, Vol. 39/3, pp. 319-335.
Seifert, C. M., & Hutchins, E. L. (1992). Error as opportunity: Learning in a cooperative task. Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 7/4, pp. 409-435.
Australian Universities’ Review, Vol. 38/2, pp. 12-15.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners‘ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-283.
Sheppard, K. ( 1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, Vol. 23, pp. 103–110.
Shetzer, H. & Warschauer, M. (2000)An electronic literacy approach to network-based language teaching. Dalam M. A. Warschauer, Network- based language teaching: Concepts and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shute, V. J. ( 2007). Focus on Formative Feedback. Princenton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.
Shute, V. J. (2006). Assessments for learning: Great idea, but do they work?. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Shute, V. J., Woltz,. San Francisco, the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco
Simpson, J. M. (2006). Feedback on Writing: Changing EFL Students‘ Attitudes. TESL Canada Journal, Vol. 24/1, Winter 2006 .
Sims, R. (2003). Promises of Interactivity: Aligning learner perceptions and expectations with strategies for flexible and online learning. Distance Education, Vol. 24/1, pp. 87-104.
Sivyer, D. L. (2005). "The Effect of Positive/Negative Feedback Awareness on Self-Efficacy and Writing Performance". . Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations.
Slavin, R., Leavey, M. & Madden, N. (1984). Combining cooperative learning and individualized instruction: Effects on student mathematics
achievement, attitudes, and behaviors. Elementary School Journal, Vol. 84, pp. 409–422.
Smith, K. H. (1972) Changes in group structure through individual and group feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 24/3),
responses to student writing. College Composition and Communication, Vol. 48, pp.249–268.
Smith, S. (2003a). The role of Technical Expertise in Engineering and Writing Teachers' Evaluations of Students' Writing. Written Communication, Vol. 20/1, pp. 37-80.
Smith, S. (2003b). What is "Good" Technical communication? A comparison of the standards Of writing and engineering instructors. Technical Communication Quarterly, Vol. 12/1, pp. 7 - 24.
Sokmen, A. (1988). Taking advantage of conference-centered writing. TESOL Newsletter, Vol. 22/1, pp.5-17.
Sorenson, S. (2010). Webster’s Newworld, Student Writing Handbook. Canada: Wiley Publishing, Inc.
Sperling, M. (1990). I want to talk to each of you: Collaboration and the teacher student writing conference. Research in the Teaching ofEnglish, Vol. 24/3, pp. 279-321.
Stake, E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stake, E. (1985). ‗Case study.‘ In Nisbet, J., Mergary, J., and Nisbet, S. (1985). (Eds). World yearbook of education 1985. Research, policy and politics. London: Nicholas Publishing Company.
Stake, Robert. (1998). ―Case Studies‖ in: Norman Denzin & Yvonna Lincoln. (eds.): Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.
Stanley, J. (1992). ‗Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators‘. Journal of Second Language Writing Vol. 1/3, pp. 217-33.
Steel, Kimberly (2007) Definition for Writing Conventions. Retrieved 23 June 2011, Last updated 14 November 2007 from kimskorner4teachertalk.com.
Storper, M. & Venables, A.J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, Vol. 4, pp.351-370.
STPB (2012) Buku Panduan Penyusunan Skripsi Program Strata -1 Bandung: STPB
Swales, J.M. & Feak, C.B.(1994). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Taks and Skilss. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
Symons, M. (2001). Learning Assistance: Enhancing the PhD Experience. in A. Bartlett & G. Mercer (eds.), Postgraduate research supervision (pp. 101-112). New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Tardy, C. M. (2006). Researching first and second language genre learning: A comparative review and a look ahead. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 15/2, pp. 79-101.
Tarras, M. (2002). Using assessment for learning and learning from assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 27, pp.501-510.
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2003). The past and future of mixed methods research: From Data triangulation to mixed model designs. In A.
Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (pp. 671–701). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Taylor, S. & Beasley, N. (2005). A Handbook for doctoral supervisors. London: Routledge.
Tellis, W. (1997). Introduction to Case Study. The Qualitative Report, Vol 3/2, July 1997.
Thalheimer, W. (2008 ). Providing Learners with Feedback—Part 2: Peer- reviewed research compiled for training, education, and e-learning.
Retrieved November 31, 2003, from http://www.work-learning.com/catalog/
Thalheimer, W. (2006). Spacing Learning Events Over Time: What the Research Says. Retrieved January 9, 2003, from http://www.work-
learning.com/catalog/.
Thody, A. (2006). Writing and presenting research. London: sage Publications.
Thomas, S. (2000). How to Write Health Science Paperes, Dissertation and Thesis. London: Harcourt Publishers Ltd.
Tiene, D. (2000). Online discussions: a survey of advantages and disadvantages compared to Face-to-face discussions. Journal of Educational
Multimedia and Hypermedia, Vol. 9/4, pp. 371–384.
Environmental Intentions and Self-Beliefs. Environment and Behavior, August 1, 2012
Truscott, J. (1996). The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes. Language Learning, Vol. 46, pp. 327-369.
Tseng, S. & Tsai, C.C. (2006). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, Vol. 23, pp. 262-267.
Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 22, pp.389-404.
University, D. (2009). The Literature Review. Victoria, Autralia: Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
University, W. M. (2009). Writer's Handbook: Common Writing Assignments: Review of Literature. Wisconsin, Madison: Wisconsin-Madison Writing Center.
Vasquez, J.A. (1993). The War Puzzle: Cambridge Studies in International Relations:Cambridge. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vilkinas, T. (2002). The PhD process: The supervisor as manager. Education and Training,Vol. 44/3, pp. 129-137.
Villamil, O.S. and Guerrero, M.C.M. (1996). ‗Peer revisions in the L2 classroom: social cognitif activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behaviour‘. Journal of Second Language Writin, Vol. 5/1, pp. 51-75.
Vollmeyer, R. and Rheinberg, F. (2005).Surprising Effect of Feedback on Learning. Learning and Instruction. Vol. 15. pp.589- 602.
Wang, Q. & Woo, H. L. (2007). Comparing asynchronous online discussions and face-to-face discussions in a classroom setting. British Journal of Educational Technology Vol 38 No 2.
Wang, T. & Li, L. Y. (2011). ‗Tell me what to do‘ vs. ‗guide me through it‘: Feedback experiences of international doctoral students. Active Learning Vol. 12/2, pp. 101-112.
HERDSA Annual Conference, Darwin, 6-9 July 2009: pp 444-452.
Ware, P. D. & Warschauer, M. (2006). Electronic feedback and second language writing. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland, (Eds.) Feedback in second anguage lwriting: Contexts and issues (pp. 1-20). New York: Cambridge.
Wegerif, R. (2008). Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological
assumptions in research on educational dialogue. research on educational dialogue. British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 34/3, pp. 347-361.
Weigle, S. (2002). Assessing Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Eds.
Wisker, G., Exley, K., Antoniou, M. & Ridley, P. (2008), Working one-to-one with students: supervising, coaching, mentoring, and personal tutoring. London: Routledge.
Wong-Kam, J. & Vasquez, V. (2003). Writing today: Between the ideal and the real world of teaching. School Talk, Vol. 9/1, pp. 1-7.
Wood, D., Bruner, J.S. & Ross, G. (1976).The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry. Vol. 17, pp. 89-100.
Wright, J. & Lodwick, R. (1989). The process of the PhD: A study of the first year of doctoral study. Research Papers in Education, Vol. 4, pp. 22–56
Yin, R. K. (2002) Case Study Research: Design a nd Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publication.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (1993). Applications of case study research. Applied Social Research Series, Vol. 34. London: Sage.
Yorke, M. (2003). ‗Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice‘. Higher Education, Vol. 45, pp. 477–501.
Young, K., Fogarty, M. P. & McRea, S. (1987). The management of doctoral studies in the social sciences. London, England: PSI.
Zainal, Z.(2007)‖ Case study as a research method‖, Journal of Jurnal Kemanusiaan, Vol.9, No. January, pp.1-6.
Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 19/1, pp. 79-101.
Zelditch, M. (1990). Mentor roles. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Western Association of Graduate Schools. Cited in Powell, R. C. & Pivo, G. (2001), Mentoring: The faculty-graduate student relationship. Tucson,
AZ: University of Arizona.
Zhang, S. (1995). RE-examining the effcetive avantages of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, Vol. 4/3, pp. 209-222 .
Zhao, F. (2002) Transforming Quality in Research Supervision: A Knowledge Management Approach. School of Management, Business
Faculty, RMIT University Melbourne
Zhao, C. G. (2007). More than a signature: How advisor choice and advisor behaviour affect student satisfaction. Journal of Further and Higher Education, Vol. 31/3, pp. 263-281.
Zhu, C. (2001) ‗Supervision on Officials Must Tighten‘. Retrieved December 12, 2010 from http:/www.china.org.cn/english/14230.htm
Zimmerman, B.J. & Schunk, D.H. (2001) Self-regulated learning and academic achievement:theoretical perspectives. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
