Vol 3, No 4, October-Deceuber 1994 Aminoplryllins on AV
Block
23I
Atropine-Resistant
Atrioventricular
Block
in
Non-Q-wave
Myocardial
Infarction:
The Role of
Low
Dose
Aminophylline
(case
report)
PeterKabo,
Asikin
Hanafiah
ABSTRAK
ton-Q-wave mioknrd infark akut yang kecil tanpa ilt sanping.
lttporan
ini nenyaranka,'t penggunaan dosis kecil aninofilin pada blok AV yangatopiniresistanî
yang niokard infurk akut.ABSTRACT
Besides Bez.old-Jarisch refle.r, activatiott of adenositle receptors by adenosine released
fronr
ischetrtic ,1)tocsrd'aI tissue is the second tnechanism respottsibleforepto
atrioventricular (AV) block during acute inferior ,ryo"oràiol ittfarctio,l (MCI). Atttittophylline, a asbeet
everse this 4'pe ofatropine-resistanî AV btock.In
this article, ati episodelock
and
by120
ophylline, a conpetilive adenosine receptor antagonist, itt a patient withdverse
rePort suggests a use of low dose atttittiphyllineiit
atropine-resistant AVKeywords: Atttittophl,!!!ns, Atopine-resistant AV block
INTRODUCTION
It
iswell
documented
thatatrioventricular (AV) block
occurs more
commonly in
patients
with inferior
thananterior myocardial
infarction (MCI).
According
to Berger
andRyan
review,l
high-de-greeAV block
complicating
acuteinferior
myocardial
infarction may be
caused
by
Bezold-Jarisch reflex
which is
atropine-sensitive
andoccurs
usually within
24
hours
after the infarction,
and activation
of
adenosine receptors
by
adenosine released
from
is-chemic myocardium which is
atropine-resistant,
but may beaminophylline-sensitive. It
occursusually after
24
hours
of
infarction
and
is
associatedwith a
largeinfarct
area.2In
this
article,
we report
anatropine-resistant
butaminophylline-sensitive
of
complete heart block,
which
occurs
within
24 hours
in
asmall non-e-wave
myocardial
infarction.
CASE REPORT
A
60-year-old woman
wasreferred
from
theAir-force
Hospital after being given
Dopamine
drip,
pethidine
50mg, Cedocard
10mg,
andNitrodisc who
was diag_nosed
with
acute
non-Q-wave myocardial infarction
complicated
by
severehypotension
andbradycardia.
She
had
an
angina
attack at
9.OOAM,
and
had beengiven anti-anginal therapy. However,
atnight
shesuffered
from
atypical infarction
chestpain
and drow-siness,which
drived
herto
thehospital.
The
risk
factors
from
having coronary artery
dis_ easewere
diabetesmellitus
andhypertension,
Physical examination on
arrival
She looked pale and somnolence. Blood
pressure(BP)=66/40
mmHg,
heart
rate
(HR)=40 x/min,
respiratory
rate(RR)=24 x/min,
normaljugular
venousNttÎionol Cardiac Centre'
Runnh
Sakit Janlung HarapanKita,
Departtttentof
Cartliology,
Facultl,of
Medicine, lJttiversityof
232
Kabo and Hanafiahpressure, weak heart sound,
normal respiratory
sound, andcold extremities.
ECG
showed
a
second degree
(Mobitz type
II)
AV-block, atrial rate: 96 x/min, ventricular
rate:
44x/miq, normal QRS axis, ST-
depression
and
T-in-verted on
leadI, aVL, V3-V6.
Laboratory findings:
Hemoglobin:
8.7 g/l;
Leukocytes : 8700/pl
; Hematocrite : 27 v ol%o; Creatine
kinase(CK):242
prll; Creatine kinasemyocardial
band(CKMB):11.8
pr/l; otherswere
within normal limit.
Management
The
patient
was
first
given
oxygen and atropine
sul-phate0.5 mg
(I.V).
Soonafter this
herblood
pressurerose
to
I2O|7O
mmHg.
The
ECG showed
a
sinusafter at
I
, Ten minutes after airopine I
,
. r i I i ; i i I
,iSEp
94
0l
:23:
15
HR 105 LEADII
Soon after atropineIII
(0.5 mg)Ten minutes after atropine
III
'; l:l
iii::ilrl
After aminophylline 120 mg (I.V.)
i,ililirii,;i
Med
J
Univ Indontachycardia
with ventricular
rateof
110x/min
(Figure
l),
and thepatient
resumedconsciousness. However,
aftet.10 minutes, the blood
pressure dropped again
accompanied
with
severe
bradycardia.
These
eventsoccurred repeatedly
threetimes
in
arow.
While
the
temporary pace-maker was
being
prepared,
she was given
aminophylline I2O
mg
(2mg/kgbw)
followed by
O.2mg/kgbw/hr
drip.
At
this
time,
her
blood
pressure
andheart rate
could
be
res-tored to normal
andstabilized,
andher
generalcondi-tion
improved.
She
was then given medication
for
the
non-Q-wave myocardial infarction
and packed
red cells for
the anemia.
On
the4th day,
thepatient
left
thecoronary
careunit without
any complication.
;C2
SEPAUTOGAiN.:;ri
lrii
irrlll
ropine
I
(0.5 nrg)Vol 3, No 4, October-Deceuber 1994
DISCUSSION
In
the
majority of
cases, secondor third
degree heartblock complicating
inferior
MCI
are response
to
atropine.'
However,
heartblock
occurredafter
thefirst
24
hours
in a
large
inferior
MCI
is usually
atropine-resistant;
because
it
is
related
to
the
release
of
adenosineby
theischemic myocardium, which
stimu-lates a
specific
adenosine receptors andin turn
depres-sesAV
conduction.4
Aminophylline which
possessespositive
inotro-pic
and recepto release, terase,6dial
cells.
It
wastherefore
ableto
reverse theatropine-resistant complete
AV
block in
acuteinferior
MCI,2,8 and has beenreported
successin
treating parcxysmal
sinus bradycardia,e
sick
sinus
syndrome-,lband
atrial
fibrillation with
aslow ventricular
response.ll
The conventional
doseof aminophylline wed
to
reverse
atropine-resistant heart
block2'8was 300-400
,gi
ously
as asingle
dose).nta
levelof aminophylline
0 - as has been
shown
thatin
this
therapeutic dose, aminophylline
shortened
.TîïIiÏiT:
aminophytline
as
tow
as 3,7
mg/liter
tî;:;j:it:il$
nodal
function
in
patients
with
sinus
bradycardia,
whic.ll
is
related
to
antagonism
of
adenosine
recep-tors.12
Indeed, as
in
present report,
low
dose-.of
aminophylline, thar
is
120
mg
(2
mg/kgbw)
could
control the
atropine-resistant
complete heart
block.
Other
than
this, we
have
the sameexperience
in two
other
cases
where l2O
mg
of
aminophylline
could
reverse
atropine-resistant
AV
block complicating
in_ferior MCI.
Complete
AV
block in
acuteMCI
should
be tem_porar
College
of
Ca
idelinés
for
th
teMCI,
especiallly
if
theie
aresymptoms
of
low
cardiac
out-put and
atropine-resistant.
However,
temporary
car_diac pacemaker may have many
complications include
ventricular arrhythmias, ventricular
perforation,
bleeding, infections, pneumothorax etc. More
over,
some
hospital
lity.
Therefore,
looking
for
an
pharmacologi-cal
treatments
stantAV block
are needed.
Anrinophylline
haslong
been proven to be ableto
treat
bradyarrhythmias
associatedwith
ischemic
heartAnûnophl,lline on AV
Block
233disease.t3
The arrhythmogenic and vasodilatation
ef-fects
of
this agent havelimited
its usein
thiscondition.
However,
theseeffects was
found to
occur
mostly in
the
therapeutic
serumconcentrations
rangedfrom
lO-l5
mg/l.e ormor..
14In low concentrationlon
the
other
hand,
aminophylline
induced pulmonary
andsystemic
vasoc_onstriction''
and was
without
adrenergic
ef-fect. lo
ht
view
of
the
fact
that
increased sympathetic
tr
mYocardial
ly,
aminophyl-arr
The
present
data,
in
conjunction
with
previous
experimental
observations
and
case reports, support
the
other alternative
useof low
doseaminophylline in
atropine resistant complete heart
block complicating
myocardial
infarction.
REFERENCES
l.
Berger PB, RyandTJ.
Inferior myocardial infarction. Cir-culation, 1990; 8l:
401-ll.
2. Shah PK, Nalos P, Peter
T.
Atropine resistantpost
infarc_ tion completeAV
block: possible roleof
adenosine and improvementwith
aminophylline.Am
Heartf,
19gZ; I 13:194-5.3. Sclarovsky S, Strasberg B, Hirshberg A, Arditi A, læwin RF, Agmon
I.
Advanced early and late atrioventricular block in acuteinferior
wall
myocardial infarction.Am
Heart J,1984;108: 19-24.
4. Belardinelli L, Fenton R, West A, Linden J, Althaus J, Beme r action of adenosine and the antagonism on the atrioventricular conduction in iso_
lated perfused guinea pig and rat hearts. Circ. Res., l9g2;5 1:
569-79.
5. Vestal RE, Eviksson CE, Musser B, Ozaki LK, Halter JB. Effect
of
intravenous atninophylline on plasma levelsof
catecholamines and related candiovascular and metabolic responses in man. Circulation, 1983;67: 162_7L.
6. Marcus ML, Skelton CL, Grauer LE, Epstein SE. Effects
of
theophylline on myocardial mechanics. Am J physiol, 1972; 222: l3L6-65.
7. Blinks JR, Olson CB, Jewell BR, Braveny
p.
Influenceof
caffeine and other methylxanthineson
mechanical properties of isolated mammalian heart muscle: evidenceof
dual action. Circ Res, 1972;30:367-92.
8. Wesley RC, I-erman
BB,
DiMarco Jp, Berne RM, Belar_ dinelliL.
Mechanism of atropine-resistant atrioventricular block during inferior myocardial infarction: possible roleof
adenosine.I
Am Coll Cardiol, 1986; 8: L232-4.9. Benditt DG, Benson DW, Kreitt I, Dunnigan A, pritzker MR, Crouse
L,
ScheinmanMM.
Electrophysiologic effectsof
theophylline in young patients with recurrent symptomatic bradyarrhythmias. AmI
Cardiol, l9g3; 52: 1223-9. 10. Alboni P, Ratto B, Cappato R, Rossi p, GartoE,
Antonioli234
Kobo and Hanafiahtt.
dlboni P, Paparella N, Cappato R, Pirani R, YiannacopuluP, Antonioli GE. Long term effects of theophylline in atrial hbrillation with a slow ventricular response. Am J Cardiol,
1993;72:
ll42-5.
12. Alboni P, Rossi P, Ratto B, Pedroni P, Gatto E, Antonioli
GE. Electrophysiologic effect of oral theophylline in sinus bradycardia. Am
I
Cardiol, 1990;65: 1037-9.13. Berne RM, DiMarco IP, Belardinelli
L.
Dromotropicef-fects
of adenosine and adenosine antagonists in the treat-mentof
cardiac arrhythmias involving the atrioventricularnode.
Circulation, 1984; 69: l195-7.Med
J
Univ Indon14. Bittar G, Friedman HS. The arrhythmogenicity
of
theophyl-linc.
A
multivariate analysisof
clinical
determinants. Chest, 1991; 99: 1415-20.15. Mols P, Huynh CH, Dechamps P, Naeije N, Ham HR' Dose
dependency of aminophylline effects on hemo-dynamic and
ventricular function
in
patientswith
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest, 1993; lO3:1725-31.16.Zipes DP. Genesis of cardiac arrhyhmias: electrophysiole gical consideration. In: Hearl Disease.
A
Textbook ofCar-diovascular Medicine.
Ed:
Braunwald. Fourth edition,