T BIO 1303131 Bibliography

(1)

Desti Herawati , 2015

PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Acar, O. & Patton B. R. (2012). Argumentation and Formal Reasoning Skills in Argumentation-based Guided Inquiry Course. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4756-4760.

Arends, R. I. (2009). Learning to Teach. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Bekiroglu, F. O. & Eskin, H. (2012). Examination of the Relationship Between Engagement in Scientific Argumentation and Conceptual Knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1415-1443.

Berland, L. K. & Hammer, D. (2011). Framing for Scientific Argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

Bottcher, F. & Meisert, A. (2011). Argumentation in Science Education: A Model-based Framework. Journal of Science and Education, 20, 102–140.

Bulgren, J. A., Ellis J. D., & Marquis J. G. (2014). The Use and Effectiveness of an Argumentation and Evaluation Intervention in Science Classes. Journal of Science Education Technology, 23, 82-97.

Brown, N. J. S., et al. (2010). The Evidence-Based Reasoning Framework: Assessing Scientific Reasoning. Educational Assessment, 15, 123-141.

Cetin, P. S., Dogan, N., & Kutluca, A. Y. (2014). The Quality of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Argumentation: Inﬂuence of Content Knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 309-331.

Chen, C. T. & She, H. C. (2014). The Effectiveness of Scientific Inquiry with/ without Integration of Scientific Reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design 3rd ed. USA:: SAGE Publications, Inc.

(2)

Desti Herawati , 2015

PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL

Students’ Argumentation Skills About Socioscientific Issues in High School Genetics. Research in Science Education, 40, 133–148.

Ding, L., Wei X., & Mollohan K. (2014). Does Higher Education Improve Student Scientific Reasoning Skills?. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.

Dolan, E. & Grady, J. (2010). Recognizing Students’ Scientific Reasoning: A Tool for Categorizing Complexity of Reasoning During Teaching by Inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 31 – 55.

Dunbar, K. N. & Klahr, D. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. USA: Oxford University Press.

Duschl, R. A. (2007). Quality Argumentation and Epistemic Criteria. Dalam S. Erduran & M. Jimenez-Aleixandre (eds). Argumentation in Science Education, Science & Teachnology Education Library, 35, 159-175.

Ekanara, B. (2013). Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. (Tesis). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J. Y. (2015). Research Trends on Argumentation in Science Education: A Journal Content Analysis From 1998 – 2014. International Journal of STEM Education, 2, 5.

Feierabend, T., et al. (2012). Two approaches for analyzing students’ competence of ‘evaluation’ in group discussions about climate change. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 7 (4), 581-598.

Foong, C. C. & Daeniel, E. G. S. (2010). Assessing students’ argumentation made in sosio-scientific contexts: The considerations of structural complexity and the depth of content knowledge. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 9, 1120-1127.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Furtak, E. M., et al. (2008). A Framework For Analyzing Reasoning In Science Classroom Discourse. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York.

Gillies, R. M. & Nichols, K. (2015). How to Support Primary Teachers’ Implementation of Inquiry: Teachers’ Reflections on Teaching Cooperative Inquiry-Based Science. Research in Science Education, 45, 171-191.

(3)

Desti Herawati , 2015

PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL

Goldstein, M., Crowell, A., & Kuhn, D. (2009). What Constitutes Skilled Argumentation and How Does it Develop?. Informal Logic, 29 (4), 379-395.

Han, J. (2013). Scientific Reasoning: Research, Development, and Assessment. Dissertation. The Ohio State University.

Hakyolu, H. & Bekiroglu, F. O. (2011). Assessment of Students’ Science Knowledge Levels and Their Involvement with Argumentation. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 2 (1).

Inch, E. S., Warnick, B., & Endres, D. (2006). Critical Thinking and Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Kaya, E., Erduran, S., & Cetin, P. S. (2010). High School Students’ Perception of Argumentation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3971–3975.

Keskin, S. C. et al. (2013). Students’ Cognitive Awareness about the Reasons of Environmental Problems. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28 (3), 378-381.

Khan, M. A. & Ghouri, A. M. (2011). Environmental Pollution: Its Effects on Life and Its Remedies. Journal of Arts, Science, & Commerce, 11 (2).

Koenig, K., Schen M., & Bao L. (2012). Explicitly Targeting Pre-service Teacher Scientific Reasoning Abilities and Understanding of Nature of Science through an Introductory Science Cource. Winter, 21 (2).

Konstantinidou, A., & Macagno, F. (2013). Understanding Students’ Reasoning: Argumentation Schemes as an Interpretation Method in Science Education. Science & Education, 22, 1069 – 1087.

Korir, D. K., & Kipkemboi F. (2014). The Impact of School Environment and Peer Influences on Students’ Academic Performance in Vihiga Country, Kenya. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4 (5).

Kuhn, D. & Udell, W. (2003). The Development of Argument Skills. Child Development, 74 (5), 1245 – 1260.

(4)

Desti Herawati , 2015

PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL

synthetic view. International Journal of Science and Mathematic Education, 2, 307-338.

Lazonder, A. W., & Drost S. W. (2014). Advancing Scientific Reasoning in Upper Elementary Classrooms: Direct Instruction Versus Task Structuring. Journal of Science Education and Technology.

Lee, C. Q., & She, H. C. (2010). Facilitating Students’ Conceptual Change and

Scientific Reasoning Involving the Unit of Combustion. Research in Science Education, 40, 479–504.

Manurung, S. R. (2013). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Dengan Media Hiperteks Berdasarkan Skema Pemecahan Masalah Berintikan Argumentasi Tolmin: Suatu Studi Penerapan pada Topik Kinematika. (Disertasi). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Marzita P., et al. (2015). The Classroom Physical Environment and Its Relation to Teaching and Learning Comfort Level. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5 (3).

McDonald, C. V. (2013). An examination of preservice primary teachers’ written arguments in an open inquiry laboratory task. Science Education International, 24 (3), 254-281.

McDonald, C. V. (2014). Preservice Primary Teachers’ Written Arguments in a Socioscientific Argumentation Task. Electronic Journal of Science Education,18 (7).

Mercier, H., & Heintz, C. (2014). Scientist’s Argumentative Reasoning. Springer Science and Business Media, 33, 513-524.

Mohammad, R. F., & Kumari, R. (2007). Effective Use of Textbooks: A Neglected Aspect of Education in Pakistan. Journal of Education for International Development, 3, 1.

Nuangchalerm, P. & Kwuanthong, B. (2010). Teaching “Global Warming” through Socioscientific Issues-based Instruction. Asian Social Science, 6 (8).

Okumus, S. & Unal, S. (2012). The effects of Argumentation Model on Studens’ Achievement and Argumentation Skills in Science. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 457 – 461.

(5)

Desti Herawati , 2015

PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL

Palar, H. (2008). Pencemaran dan Toksikologi Logam Berat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Permana, J. (2008). Pengelolaan Kelas dalam Belajar Mengajar. (Online). Tersedia:

http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FIP/JUR._ADMINISTRASI_PENDIDIKAN/19 5908141985031-JOHAR_PERMANA/A_Pengelolaan_Kelas.pdf. [27 Juli 2015].

Piraksaa, C., Srisawasdib, N., & Koulc, R. (2014). Effect of Gender on Students’ Scientific Reasoning Ability : A Case Study in Thailand. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 486 – 491.

Purwanto, N. (2010). Prinsip – Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Robinson, T. J., et al. (2014). The Impact of Open Textbooks on Secondary Science Learning Outcomes. Educational Researcher, 43 (7), 341 – 351.

Roshayanti, F. (2012). Pengembangan Model Asesmen Argumentatif Untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Argumentasi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Fisiologi Manusia. (Disertasi). Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Rustaman, N., et al. (2003). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Bandung: FPMIPA UPI.

Sagala, S. (2010). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Salandanan, G. G. (2000). Teaching Approaches and Strategies. Quezon city: Katha Publishing Co., Inc.

Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the Ways Students Generate Arguments in Science Education: Current Perspectives and Recommendations for Future Directions. WileyInterScience.

Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational Psychology 5th ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Santrock, J. W. (2013). Children. New York: The Mc-Graw Hill Companies, Inc. Šešelja, C., & Straßer, D. (2013). Abstract argumentation and explanation applied

(6)

Desti Herawati , 2015

PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL

. Using Toulmin’s Framework for the Analysis of Everyday Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations. Argumentation, 17,: 185-202.

Sprod, T. (1998). “I Can Change Your Opinion On That”: Social Constructivist Whole Class Discussions and Their Effect on Scientific Reasoning. Research in Science Education, 28 (4), 463 – 480.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sutopo & Waldrip, B. (2014). Impact of A Representational Approach on Students’ Reasoning and Conceptual Understanding in Learning Mechanics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 741-765.

Tytler, R. & Peterson S. (2003). Tracing Young Children’s Scientific Reasoning. Research in Science Education, 33, 433-465.

Tytler, R. et al. (2013). Constructiong Representations to Learn in Science. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Varma, K. (2014). Supporting Scientific Experimentation and Reasoning in Young Elementary School Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 381–397.

Verheij, B. (2005). Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme. Argumentation, 19, 347-371.

Waldrip, B. (2012). Reasoning through representing in school science. Teaching Science., 58, 14-18.

Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Sellings, P. (2013). Explaining Newton’s laws of motion: using student reasoning through representations to develop conceptual understanding. Instructional Science, 41, 165 – 189.

Walsh, J. A. & Sattes, B. D. (2011). Thinking Through Quality Questioning: Deepening Student Engagement. USA: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.

(7)

Desti Herawati , 2015

PENALARAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC REASONING) SISWA SEKOLAH BERORIENTASI LINGKUNGAN DAN SEKOLAH MULTINASIONAL

Wu, Y. T. & Tsai, C. C. (2011). The Effects of Different On-Line Searching Activities on High School Students’ Cognitive Structures and Informal Reasoning Regarding a Socio-scientific Issue. Research in Science Education, 41, 771-785.

Yang, F.Y. & Tsai, C.C. (2010). Reasoning about science-related uncertain issues and epistemological perspectives among children.Instructional Science, 38, 325–354.

Yun, S, M. & Kim, H. B. (2015). Changes in Studens’ Partisipation and Small Group Norms in Scientific Argumentation. Research in Science Education, 45, 465 – 484.

Zimmerman, C. (2005). The Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills: What Psychologists Contribute to an Understanding of Elementary Science Learning. (Online). Tersedia: