• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Teknik Linierisasi Untuk Menyelesaikan Persoalan Rantai Suplai Lokasi-Inventori

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Teknik Linierisasi Untuk Menyelesaikan Persoalan Rantai Suplai Lokasi-Inventori"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Azadi, M., Farzipoor Saen, R. 2012. Developing A New Chance-Constrained DEA Model for Suppliers Selection in The Presence of Undesirable Outputs. Inter-national Journal of Operational Research, 13(11), 44-46.

, B., Cuthbertson, R., Ewer, G., Klaas-Wissing, T.,Piotrowicz, W., Tyssen, C. 2011. Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Practical Ideas for Moving Towards Best Practice.Springer, Germany.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., dan E. 1987. Measuring The Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 2, 429-444. Chen, Ch.M. 2009.A network-DEA model with new efficiency measures to incor-porate the dynamic effect in production networks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 194, 687-699.

Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Tone, K. 2007. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Com-prehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-solver Soft-ware. Springer, USA.

Handfield, R.,B., Ernest L. Nichols. 2001. Supply Chain Redesign, Transforming Supply Chain Into Integrated Value System. Prentice Hall, USA

Hugos, M. 2006. Essentials of Supply Chain Management 2nd

ed. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New Jersey

Kahraman, C., Cebecci, U., Ulukan, Z. 2003. Multi-criteria Supplier Selection Using Fuzzy AHP.Logistics Information Management Systems, 16(6), 382-394. Kumar, A., Jain, V., Kumar, S.A. 2014. A Comprehensive Environment Friendly

Approach for Supplier Selection.Omega, 42(1), 109-23.

Likert, R. 1932. A Technique for The Measurement of Attitudes, Archives of Psy-chology, 22, 140, 1-55.

Mahmood, W. H. W., Tukimin, R., Muhamad, R. M., Yusup, Z. M. 2014.Sustain-able Criteria in A Supplier Selection: A Pre Review.International Symposium on Research in Innovation and Sustainability, 26(5), 1841-1844.

Nemoto, J., dan Goto, M. 1999. Dynamic DEA: Modelling Intertemporal Behavior of A Firm in The Presence of Productive Inefficiencies.Economic Letters 64, 51-56.

Noorizadeh, A., Mahdiloo, M. Farzipoor Saen, R. 2011. Supplier Selection in The Presence of Dual-role Factors, Nondiscretionary Inputs and Weight Restric-tion. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 8(2), 134-152.

Porter, M. 1985. Competitive Advantage, Creating and Sustaining Superior Perfor-mance. The Free Press, New York.

Pourmahmoud, J. 2015. New Modelling For Ranking DMUs in DDEA As A Special Case.Int. J. Industrial Mathematics, Volume 7, No. 2.

36

(2)

37

Repkova, I. 2013. Estimation of Banking Efficiency in The Czezh Republic: Dynamic Data Envelopment Analysis.Law and Economics Review, 4(4), 261-275. Stewart, T.J. 2010.Goal Directed Benchmarking for Organizational Efficiency.

Omega, 38(6), 534-539.

Tajbakhsh, A., dan Hassini, E. 2014.A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach to Evaluate Sustainability in Supply Chain Networks. Journal of Cleaner Pro-duction, 105 (2015) 74-85.

Tavana, M., Yousefi, S., Shabanpour, H., Saen, R.F. 2016.A Hybrid Goal Program-ming and Dynamic Data Envelopment Analysis Framework for Sustainable Supplier Evaluation.Researchgate.

Ting, S.C., dan D.I. Cho. 2008. An Integrated Approach for Supplier Selection and Purchasing Decisions.Int. J. Volume 13, 116-127.

Tone, K., Tsutsui, M. 2010. Dynamic DEA: A Slacks Based Measure Approach. Omega, 38 (3-4), 145-156.

Tone, K., Tsutsui, M. 2014. Dynamic DEA With Network Structure: A Slacks Based Measure Approach.Omega, 42(1), 124-131.

Wang, K., Yu, Sh., Zhang, W. 2013. Chinas regional energy and environ-mental efficiency: a DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation. Math.Comput.Model. 58, 1117-1127.

Waters, D. 2003. An Introduction to Supply Chain Management. Palgrave Macmil-lan, New York.

Weber, A., Current, J., Desai, A. 2000. An Optimization Approach to Determining The Number of Vendors to Employ. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 5(2), 90-8.

Wierzbicki, A.P. 1999. Reference Point Approaches. In: Gal, T., Stewart. T.J., Hanne, T., Editors, Multicriteria Decision Making : Advances in MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory and Applications, Chapter 9, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

Yousefi, S., Shabanpour, H., Fisher, R., Saen, R.F. 2016.Evaluating and Ranking Sustainable Suppliers by Robust Dynamic Data Envelopment Analysis. Mea-surement, 72-85.

Zouggari, A., Benyoucef, L. 2012. Simulation Based Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach for Group Multicriteria Supplier Selection Problem. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 25(3), 507-519.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Biasanya kendala orang tidak mampu menilai dan memahami dengan baik akan memiliki dampak bahwa apa yang dinilai selalu terkesan timbul kontroversi (pro and kontra). Buruk

[r]

penelitian adalah “Bagaimana tingkat kepuasan pasien rawat inap tentang. pelayanan keperawatan di

[r]

Mata pelajaran PAI tersistem dalam 3 (tiga) ranah yang terpadu, yaitu: Kognitif, Afektif, dan Psikomotor. Ranah kognitif berbentuk ujian tulis, sedangkan ranah afektif dan

Pirngadi Kota Medan, dengan menggunakan desain deskriptif.Peneliti menggunakan analisis univariat dalam penelitian ini dengan mendefinisikan variabel yang diteliti dalam

Secara umum panduan palayanan Bimbingan dan Konseling tentang Arah Peminatan Siswa bertujuan untuk memberikan panduan bagi Guru BK atau Konselor dan pihak-pihak lain

たいῌ まず῍ 3ῌ2, 3ῌ3 は正答率がそれぞれ 15῔῍ 65῔であったῌ この 2 文の前 半部分は ῐイタリア旅行中῍