GODFREY HODGSON HOLMES TARCA
CHAPTER 7
Assets defined
• IASB (AASB) Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements:
– an asset is a resource controlled by the entity as a
result of past events and from which future economic benefits are expected to flow to the entity
Assets defined
Three essential characteristics:
– future economic benefits – control by an entity
– past events
Future economic benefits
• Future economic benefits are the potential to contribute, either directly or indirectly, to the flow of cash and cash equivalents to the entity
– profit seeking entity – not-for-profit entity
• Relate to economic resources – scarcity
– utility
Future economic benefits
• An asset is something that exists now
• Has the capability of rendering service or benefit currently or in the future
• Distinguish between the object, such as a
Control by an entity
• The economic benefit must be controlled by the entity
• An entity’s right to use or control an asset is never absolute
• Ownership is often concurrent with control, but it is not an essential characteristic of an asset
• Does not rely on legal enforceability
Past events
• Control as a result of a past event • Planned assets are excluded
Exchangeability
• Some argue that a 4th essential characteristic is that an asset be exchangeable
• Separable from an entity
Exchangeability
• MacNeal
A good that lacks exchangeability must lack
economic value because its purchase or sale must forever remain impossible, and thus no market
price for it can ever exist
– goodwill
Asset recognition
• The extent and timing of the recognition of assets is important because it can have
economic consequences for preparers and users of financial statements
Asset recognition
• Recognising assets on the balance sheet involves recognition rules
– conventions and authoritative pronouncements • Recognition criteria
– the future economic benefits must be probable – the asset must be capable of being measured
Asset recognition
• Past recognition criteria – reliance on the law
– determination of economic substance of the
transaction or event
– use of the conservatism principle: anticipate
losses, but not gains
Asset measurement
• All the elements of accounting are linked and measurement of profit flows from
measurement of the change in net assets • The rules and practices governing asset
Asset measurement
• Once the definition and recognition criteria have
been met, the accountant must decide how to measure the asset
– several measurement approaches available
– qualitative characteristics of financial information
• Once measured – on balance sheet
– restricted to just note disclosure
Tangible assets
• Traditional approach has been to measure
assets at historical cost
• IASB standards permit subsequent
remeasurement using a number of approaches
– fair value
• exit value or value in use
Intangible assets
• Accounting measurement has generally been conservative
– cost (less accumulated amortisation and
impairment) is commonly used
– fair values from an active market
– internally generated intangibles cannot be
recognised
What are the divergent arguments for recognising customer relationships in a business combination? Is
Financial instruments
• FASB/IASB
– derivatives are measured at fair value rather than
cost • IASB
– committed to the use of fair value measurement
for financial instruments
Challenges for standard setters
• FASB/IASB intend to address the issue of measurement in Phase C of the conceptual framework project
– consider measurement concepts, principles and
terms
– evaluate and rank measurement methods
• qualitative characteristics
Which measurement model?
• Fair value is the frontrunner
What are the arguments for and
against fair value measurement?
How to calculate fair value
measurement
• Various valuation techniques to calculate fair value
– the market approach
• observable prices
How to calculate fair value
measurement
• Various valuation techniques to calculate fair value
– the income approach
• conversion of future amounts - cash flows or earnings
– to a single discounted present amount
How to calculate fair value
measurement
• Various valuation techniques to calculate fair value
– the cost approach
• the amount that currently would be required to replace
In response to the credit crisis the IASB changed the rules to allow entities to choose to reclassify some financial instruments from a fair value measurement basis to a cost basis. Under what circumstances is this
reclassification allowed?
How to calculate fair value
measurement
• The valuation must emphasise market inputs – assumptions and data that market participants
How to calculate fair value
measurement
• Three hierarchical levels for the inputs
– Level 1 – quoted prices for identical items in active
markets, without adjustment
– Level 2 – quoted prices for similar items in active
markets, adjusted as appropriate for differences
– Level 3 – estimated fair value using multiple
valuation techniques consistent with the market, income and cost approaches
Issues for auditors
Issues for auditors
• Auditors need to
– understand the client firm’s processes and relevant
controls for determining fair values
– make a judgement on whether the client firm’s
measurement methods and assumptions are
appropriate and likely to provide a reasonable basis for the fair value measurement
– appreciate management’s potential biases and likely
errors
• incentives
Issues for auditors
• There is the potential that corporate failures will lead to legal action against auditors who failed to approach their audit of asset fair
Summary
• Defining assets
• Recognition and measurement criteria
• Asset recognition and the measurement of income and capital
are interrelated
• Mixed attribute measurement model and fair value
measurement methods
• Issues arising for standard setters and auditors
Key terms and concepts
• Assets
• Definitions
• Future economic benefits • Control
• Past events