DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Acker, Joan. 1990. Hierarchies Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organiation.
Gender and Society. 4 (2) : 139-157.
Aranya, et. al. 1981. An Examination of Professional Commitment in Public
Accounting. Accounting, Organization and Society. 6 (4): 271-280.
Arens, Alvin A. dan James K. Loebbecke. 1996. Auditing, Edisi Bahasa
Indonesia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Dermantoto, Argyo. 2004. Perempuan dan Pasar Kerja, Analisis Mengenai
Keterlibatan Perempuan dalam Pasar Kerja. Dilema. 17 (2): 66-79.
Djarwanto, Ps. 2001. Statistik Nonparametrik Edisi 3. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Dwiatmadja, C. dan Y.M. Kusumaningrum. 2000. Potret Perempuan Pekerja di
Masa krisis Ekonomi. Telaah Bisnis. 1 (2): 123-132.
Gitosudarmo, Indriyo dan I Nyoman Sudit. 2000. Perilaku Organisasi.
Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Giyartiningrum, Rr. Eko. 2003. Perbedaan Gaya Kepemimpinan dalam Perspektif
Gender. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi. 1 (2): 103-113.
Glover, David and Cora Caplan. 2000. Genders. London: Routledge.
Goh, Swee C. 1991. Sex Differences in Perceptions of Interpersonal Style, Career
Emphasis, Supervisory Mentoring Behavior, and Job Satisfaction. Sex
Roles: A Journal of Research. 24 (11/12): 701-710.
Handoko, T. Hani. 1995. Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
http://www.akuntanpublik.org.
IAI-KAP. 2001. Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik Per 1 Januari 2001. Jakarta:
Salemba Empat.
Ikhsan, Arfan dan Muh. Ishak. 2005. Akuntansi Keperilakuan. Jakarta: Salemba
Empat.
Indriantoro, Nur dan Bambang Supomo. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis untuk
Akuntansi dan Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Kreitner, Robert dan Angele Kinicki. 2003. Pengantar Organisasi Buku 1. Edisi
Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Kumadji, S. dkk. 2004. Pemberdayaan Perempuan dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja
Karyawan. Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. 16 (1): 35-46.
Kuncoro, Mudrajad. 2003. Metode Riset untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi. Jakarta:
Erlangga.
Kuntari, Yeni dan Indra Wijaya Kusuma. 2001. Pengalaman Organisasi, Evaluasi
terhadap Kinerja dan Hasil Karir pada Kantor Akuntansi Publik:
Pengujian Pengaruh Gender. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia. 1
(16): 74-87.
Kusumawardani. 2005. Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi dan Komitmen
Profesional terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Auditor (Studi Empiris pada
Kantor Akuntansi Publik di Eks-Karisidenen Surakarta). Skripsi FE
UMS.
Kussudyarsana.2006. Komputer Statistik. Lab. Manajemen FE UMS.
Kwelju, Junus. 2004. Pengaruh Motivasi, Perilaku Pemimpin, dan Kesempatan
Pengembangan Karir terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Jurnal Ekonomi
UNMER. 8 (3): 501-516.
Luthans, F. 1995. Organization Behavior. Mc. Graw-Hill International Editions.
Mansfield, Phyllis Kernaff et.al. 1991. The Job Climate for Women In
Traditionally Mole Blue-Collar Occupations. Sex Roles: A Journal of
Research. 25 (1/2): 63-79.
Mulyadi. 2002. Auditing. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Mulyadi dan Puradiredja. 1998. Auditing. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Murgai, Sarla R. 1991. Attitudes Toward Women as Managers in Library and
Information Science. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research. 24 (11/12):
681-700.
Nasruddin, Umar. 1999. Argumen Kesetaraan Jender: Perspektif Al Qur'an.
Jakarta: Paramadina.
Nasution, S. 1996. Metode Research: Penelitian Ilmiah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Nurgiyantoro, Burhan dkk. 2002. Statistik Terapan untuk Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu
PPA FE UMS. 2006. Modul Pelatihan Analisis Statistik dengan SPSS. Lab.
Akuntansi FE UMS.
Prawirosentono, Suyadi. 1999. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Kebijakan
Kinerja Karyawan: Kiat membangun Organisasi Kompetitif Menjelang
Perdagangan Bebas Dunia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Reksohadiprodjo, S. 1990. Manajemen Strategi. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Roos, Patricia A. 1985. Gender and Work: A Comparative Analysis of Industrial
Societies. New York: State University of New York Press.
Robbins, Stephen P. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi 10, Edisi Bahasa Indonesia.
Jakarta: PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.
Sahrah, Alimatus. 2004. Persepsi terhadap Kepemimpinan Perempuan. Anima.
19(3): 222-233.
Salim, Peter. 1979. The Scribne-Bantam English Dictionary. Jakarta: Modern
English Press.
Trisnaningsih, Sri. 2004. Perbedaan Kinerja Auditor Dilihat dari Segi Gender.
Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia. 7 (1): 108-123.
Yash. 2003. Transeksualisme: Sebuah Studi Kasus Perkembangan Transseksual
Data Master Komitmen Organisasional
28/02/2007 13:31:05 1/1
ko1 ko2 ko3 ko4 ko5 ko6 ko7 ko8 ko9 ko10 ko11 ko12
1 2 2 3 2 3 4 3 4 4 3 4 4
2 2 3 4 3 3 4 2 3 3 3 3 3
3 2 2 3 2 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3
4 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 2 3 2 2 2
5 2 2 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 3
6 3 2 2 2 4 3 3 3 3 4 3 3
7 4 4 3 2 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 4
8 2 2 3 2 4 3 4 3 3 4 2 2
9 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2
10 2 4 3 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
11 3 2 3 2 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 3
12 2 2 4 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3
13 2 2 4 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 2 4
14 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3
15 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3
16 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3
17 4 4 4 2 3 4 4 4 4 2 2 2
18 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2
19 2 2 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 4
Data Master Komitmen Profesional
28/02/2007 13:31:54 1/2
kp1 kp2 kp3 kp4 kp5 kp6 kp7 kp8 kp9 kp10 kp11 kp12 kp13
1 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 3 2
2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3
3 2 2 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4
5 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3
6 3 5 5 4 4 4 5 3 3 4 4 4 3
7 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
8 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3
9 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4
10 3 3 3 4 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
11 5 5 5 3 3 5 4 5 3 4 3 3 4
12 4 4 4 4 5 3 2 3 4 4 4 4 3
13 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 4
14 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3
15 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4
16 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 3
17 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
18 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
19 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 2
Data Master Komitmen Profesional
28/02/2007 13:31:54 2/2
kp14 kp15 kp16 kp17 kp18
1 3 2 4 4 4
2 4 3 2 3 4
3 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 3 4
5 2 2 2 2 2
6 3 3 3 3 4
7 4 2 3 4 4
8 3 3 4 4 4
9 4 4 3 3 3
10 4 2 3 4 4
11 4 4 4 4 3
12 3 3 4 4 4
13 4 3 4 4 4
14 4 3 4 4 4
15 4 3 2 3 4
16 2 3 4 4 4
17 4 3 3 4 4
18 4 3 3 4 4
19 3 2 1 2 3
Data Master Motivasi
28/02/2007 13:35:36 1/1
m1 m2 m3 m4 m5 m6 m7 m8 m9 m10
1 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 4
2 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4
3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4
5 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 4
6 4 5 4 5 4 4 3 4 4 4
7 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4
8 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 4
9 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 5
10 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 4
11 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3
12 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4
13 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
14 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 4
15 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4
16 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 4
17 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4
18 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
19 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Data Master Kepuasan Kerja
28/02/2007 13:36:08 1/1
kk1 kk2 kk3 kk4
1 3 3 3 3
2 3 4 3 2
3 2 4 3 3
4 4 4 3 4
5 4 4 4 4
6 5 5 3 5
7 4 4 4 4
8 4 4 3 3
9 3 4 4 4
10 4 4 4 4
11 4 4 4 4
12 3 4 3 3
13 4 4 3 2
14 2 3 3 3
15 3 3 3 2
16 2 3 3 3
17 4 4 3 3
18 3 3 3 3
19 3 3 3 3
Reliability
****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ******
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)
Mean Std Dev Cases
1. KO1 2.6000 .9947 20.0 2. KO2 2.6000 1.0463 20.0 3. KO3 3.1500 .9881 20.0 4. KO4 2.2500 .5501 20.0 5. KO5 3.2500 .9665 20.0 6. KO6 3.4500 .6863 20.0 7. KO7 3.3500 1.0400 20.0 8. KO8 3.3500 .8127 20.0 9. KO9 3.2500 .6387 20.0 10. KO10 3.1000 .7881 20.0 11. KO11 2.9500 .8256 20.0 12. KO12 2.9500 .7592 20.0
N of Statistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables
SCALE 36.2500 49.6711 7.0478 12
Item-total Statistics Scale Scale Corrected Mean Variance Item- Alpha if Item if Item Total if Item Deleted Deleted Correlation Deleted KO1 33.6500 42.7658 .4547 .8992
KO2 33.6500 39.9237 .6544 .8878
KO3 33.1000 39.5684 .7342 .8826
KO4 34.0000 45.6842 .4954 .8955
KO5 33.0000 39.2632 .7821 .8797
KO6 32.8000 42.2737 .7761 .8833
KO7 32.9000 38.4105 .7896 .8790
KO8 32.9000 41.9895 .6666 .8868
KO9 33.0000 44.4211 .5688 .8923
KO10 33.1500 44.1342 .4695 .8962
KO11 33.3000 43.5895 .4954 .8952
KO12 33.3000 43.4842 .5604 .8920
Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = 20.0 N of Items = 12 Alpha = .8977
Reliability
****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ******
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)
Mean Std Dev Cases
1. KP1 3.2000 .8335 20.0 2. KP2 3.6000 .8826 20.0 3. KP3 3.6000 .7539 20.0 4. KP4 3.7000 .4702 20.0 5. KP5 3.6000 .8208 20.0 6. KP6 3.5500 .6048 20.0 7. KP7 3.5500 .7592 20.0 8. KP8 3.6000 .6806 20.0 9. KP9 3.8000 .4104 20.0 10. KP10 3.7000 .6569 20.0 11. KP11 3.6500 .5871 20.0 12. KP12 3.6000 .5982 20.0 13. KP13 3.4500 .6863 20.0 14. KP14 3.5500 .6863 20.0 15. KP15 2.9500 .6863 20.0 16. KP16 3.2000 .8944 20.0 17. KP17 3.5500 .6863 20.0 18. KP18 3.7500 .5501 20.0
N of Statistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables
SCALE 63.6000 56.3579 7.5072 18
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A) Item-total Statistics Scale Scale Corrected Mean Variance Item- Alpha if Item if Item Total if Item Deleted Deleted Correlation Deleted KP1 60.4000 48.8842 .5816 .8900
KP2 60.0000 49.7895 .4648 .8949
KP3 60.0000 48.8421 .6593 .8871
KP4 59.9000 52.8316 .4836 .8934
KP5 60.0000 48.8421 .5964 .8894
KP6 60.0500 52.0500 .4517 .8938
KP7 60.0500 50.8921 .4514 .8943
KP8 60.0000 50.3158 .5778 .8900
KP9 59.8000 53.4316 .4597 .8942
KP10 59.9000 50.3053 .6032 .8893
KP11 59.9500 51.7342 .5066 .8923
KP12 60.0000 50.8421 .6046 .8896
KP13 60.1500 50.3447 .5690 .8903
KP14 60.0500 50.6816 .5327 .8914
KP15 60.6500 50.1342 .5919 .8896
KP16 60.4000 49.0947 .5156 .8930
KP17 60.0500 49.6289 .6471 .8878
KP18 59.8500 51.7132 .5488 .8914
Reliability Coefficients
N of Cases = 20.0 N of Items = 18
Alpha = .8967
Reliability
****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ******
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)
Mean Std Dev Cases
1. M1 3.7500 .4443 20.0 2. M2 3.4000 .5982 20.0 3. M3 3.7000 .4702 20.0 4. M4 3.9000 .5525 20.0 5. M5 3.4000 .5982 20.0 6. M6 3.6000 .5026 20.0 7. M7 3.3500 .5871 20.0 8. M8 3.6500 .4894 20.0 9. M9 3.9000 .3078 20.0 10. M10 3.9500 .3940 20.0
N of Statistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables
SCALE 36.6000 10.6737 3.2671 10
Item-total Statistics Scale Scale Corrected Mean Variance Item- Alpha if Item if Item Total if Item Deleted Deleted Correlation Deleted M1 32.8500 8.9763 .5635 .8331
M2 33.2000 8.3789 .5592 .8339
M3 32.9000 8.9368 .5392 .8348
M4 32.7000 8.5368 .5673 .8323
M5 33.2000 8.5895 .4923 .8410
M6 33.0000 8.8421 .5282 .8357
M7 33.2500 8.6184 .4962 .8402
M8 32.9500 8.5763 .6482 .8250
M9 32.7000 9.2737 .6963 .8300
M10 32.6500 9.1868 .5575 .8346
Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = 20.0 N of Items = 10 Alpha = .8481
Reliability
****** Method 1 (space saver) will be used for this analysis ******
R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E (A L P H A)
Mean Std Dev Cases
1. KK1 3.4000 .8208 20.0 2. KK2 3.7500 .5501 20.0 3. KK3 3.2500 .4443 20.0 4. KK4 3.2500 .7864 20.0
N of Statistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables
SCALE 13.6500 4.2395 2.0590 4
Item-total Statistics Scale Scale Corrected Mean Variance Item- Alpha if Item if Item Total if Item Deleted Deleted Correlation Deleted KK1 10.2500 2.0921 .6207 .6981
KK2 9.9000 2.7263 .6663 .6805
KK3 10.4000 3.3053 .4561 .7763
KK4 10.4000 2.1474 .6394 .6801
Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = 20.0 N of Items = 4 Alpha = .7697
Mann-Whitney Test :
Ranks
7 13.14 92.00
13 9.08 118.00
20
7 9.86 69.00
13 10.85 141.00
20
7 10.07 70.50
13 10.73 139.50
20
7 6.00 42.00
13 12.92 168.00
20 Auditor Wanita Pria Total Wanita Pria Total Wanita Pria Total Wanita Pria Total KO KP M KK
N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks
Test Statisticsb
27.000 41.000 42.500 14.000
118.000 69.000 70.500 42.000
-1.500 -.360 -.240 -2.535
.134 .719 .810 .011
.157a .757a .817a .011a
Mann-Whitney U Wilcoxon W Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)]
KO KP M KK
Not corrected for ties. a.
